oral presentation poster difference

Oratory Club

Public Speaking Helpline

Poster Vs Oral Presentation: Which Is Best In 2023?

When it comes to presenting information or research, there are two popular options: posters or oral presentations. Choosing between the two can be a tough decision, but fear not! We’re here to help you explore the key differences and find the best fit for your needs. So, let’s dive in and compare the advantages of each approach.

First up, we have posters. These visual displays offer a great way to showcase your work creatively. With posters, you can utilize eye-catching graphics, images, and charts to capture your audience’s attention. Plus, posters allow for easy interaction, as viewers can take their time to study the content at their own pace.

On the other hand, we have oral presentations, which involve speaking in front of an audience to convey your research findings. Oral presentations enable you to engage directly with your peers, expressing your ideas, and answering questions on the spot. They offer a dynamic platform for showcasing your public speaking skills and establishing your expertise.

Now that we’ve introduced both options, let’s delve deeper into the specific merits of each one—poster presentations and oral presentations. By examining the distinct features of these approaches, we can help you make an informed decision that best suits your needs and preferences. So, let’s weigh the pros and cons and find the perfect medium for your next presentation.

When deciding between a poster and an oral presentation, there are several key features to consider.

1. Visual Impact: Posters offer a visual representation of information, while oral presentations allow for direct engagement.

2. Audience Interaction: With posters, viewers can leave comments or ask questions. For oral presentations, immediate feedback is possible.

3. Versatility: Posters can be displayed for extended periods, while oral presentations allow for dynamic delivery.

4. Time Management: Posters can be viewed at any time, while oral presentations have a set duration.

5. Communication Style: Posters rely on visuals, while oral presentations include spoken words and gestures.

Consider these features to determine which format will best suit your needs.

Table of Contents

Key Takeaways: Poster vs Oral Presentation

• Posters are visual displays of information, while oral presentations involve speaking to an audience.
• Posters allow for more creativity in design and visual appeal.
• Oral presentations provide an opportunity for direct interaction and engagement with the audience.
• Posters are often used in conferences or exhibitions, while oral presentations are common in classrooms or professional settings.
• Both formats have their benefits and can be effective in communicating information.

Comparing Poster vs Oral Presentation

In today’s fast-paced world, effective communication is key. Whether it’s presenting research findings, sharing ideas, or conveying information, there are various methods to choose from. Two popular options are posters and oral presentations. In this article, we will explore the differences and similarities between these two formats, to help you make an informed decision on which method is better suited for your needs.

Overview of Posters

Posters are a visual medium for presenting information. They typically consist of a combination of text, images, graphs, and charts. Posters are often used in academic and scientific settings, such as conferences or research symposiums, to showcase research findings or present complex data. They offer a concise and visually appealing way to convey information to a large audience.

Creating a poster involves careful consideration of the layout, design elements, and content. The goal is to effectively communicate the main points of the research or topic in a visually appealing manner. Posters can be displayed on walls or presentation boards, allowing viewers to engage with the information at their own pace.

Overview of Oral Presentations

Oral presentations, on the other hand, involve the delivery of information through spoken words. This format is commonly used in academic, professional, and educational settings. Instead of relying solely on visual aids, oral presentations allow presenters to verbally explain their research or ideas, often supported by slides or visual aids.

An oral presentation typically follows a structured format, with an introduction, body, and conclusion. Presenters are expected to articulate their thoughts clearly, provide engaging explanations, and convey their message effectively. This format allows for direct interaction with the audience through questions, discussions, and feedback.

Key Features Compared

When comparing posters and oral presentations, there are several key features to consider. Let’s explore each of these features in detail and compare the two methods.

Content Delivery

In terms of content delivery, posters and oral presentations offer different approaches. Posters rely heavily on visuals and concise written information to convey the main points. Viewers can read the content at their own pace and spend more time analyzing the information presented. On the other hand, oral presentations focus on verbal communication, allowing presenters to provide more in-depth explanations and engage directly with the audience.

Engagement and Interaction

Posters provide a more self-paced experience for viewers. They can spend as much time as needed to absorb the information, making them suitable for passive engagement. However, posters lack the interactive element that oral presentations offer. Oral presentations allow for real-time interaction, such as question-and-answer sessions or audience feedback, creating a more dynamic and engaging experience.

Presentation Skills

Both posters and oral presentations require distinct presentation skills. Creating an effective poster involves designing an aesthetically appealing layout, using clear and concise language, and organizing information in a logical manner. Oral presentations, on the other hand, require strong public speaking skills, the ability to engage the audience, and effective use of visual aids. Each format requires different skill sets and preparation.

User Experience

The user experience for both posters and oral presentations can vary depending on various factors. For posters, viewers have the flexibility to study the content at their own pace, review specific details, and focus on areas of interest. However, posters may lack the personal touch and direct interaction that oral presentations provide.

In oral presentations, the audience can benefit from real-time explanations, engagement, and the opportunity to ask questions. This format allows for a more dynamic and interactive user experience. However, some audience members may feel overwhelmed by the fast pace or struggle to fully grasp the information presented in the moment.

Pros and Cons

• Visually appealing and engaging.
• Provides a concise overview of research or information.
• Allows viewers to study and analyze content at their own pace.
• Lacks direct interaction and engagement with the audience.
• May require a large amount of space for display.
• Can be challenging to condense complex information into a limited space.

Oral Presentations

• Allows for direct interaction and engagement with the audience.
• Enables presenters to provide in-depth explanations and clarify misunderstandings.
• Creates a dynamic and engaging experience for both presenters and audience members.
• Requires strong public speaking skills and presentation preparation.
• May limit the amount of information that can be covered within a given time frame.
• Relies heavily on the presenter’s ability to convey the message effectively.

Price Comparison

When it comes to cost, posters are generally more affordable compared to oral presentations. Creating a poster requires minimal resources, such as printing costs, design software, and materials for display. On the other hand, oral presentations may involve additional expenses, such as travel costs for attending conferences or professional presentation software.

Comparison Table

Here is a comparison table that highlights the key features of posters and oral presentations:

| Feature | Posters | Oral Presentations | |————————-|—————————————|————————————-| | Content Delivery | Relies on visuals and concise text | Verbal explanations and visual aids | | Engagement and Interaction | Passive engagement for viewers | Real-time interaction with audience | | Presentation Skills | Design and organization | Public speaking and visual aid usage |

Which is Better – Poster vs Oral Presentation

In conclusion, the choice between posters and oral presentations ultimately depends on various factors, such as the nature of the content, audience preferences, and available resources. Both formats have their strengths and limitations, and the decision should be based on the specific goals and circumstances of the presentation.

When choosing between posters and oral presentations, consider the level of audience engagement desired, the complexity of the information being conveyed, and the presentation skills of the presenter. While posters offer a visually appealing and self-paced experience, oral presentations provide real-time interaction and the opportunity for in-depth explanations.

In summary, posters are ideal when conveying concise information visually and when passive engagement is desired. On the other hand, oral presentations are best suited for interactive discussions, in-depth explanations, and audience engagement. Ultimately, the choice between posters and oral presentations should be based on the specific goals and requirements of the presentation.

Three reasons to choose posters:

• Visually engaging and can effectively communicate concise information.
• Allows for self-paced studying and analysis of the content.
• Minimal cost and resource requirements compared to oral presentations.

Frequently Asked Questions

When it comes to presenting information, two common formats are posters and oral presentations. Here are answers to some frequently asked questions about these two formats and their differences.

1. Which format is better for presenting information, a poster or an oral presentation?

Both formats have their advantages, and the choice depends on the context and purpose of the presentation. Posters are visually appealing and allow viewers to absorb information at their own pace. They are great for displaying complex data or visuals and can be easily referenced. Oral presentations, on the other hand, allow for direct interaction with the audience and the opportunity to convey information with enthusiasm and charisma. They are more dynamic and can often be more engaging for the audience. Ultimately, it’s important to consider the specific goals of your presentation and choose the format that aligns best with those objectives.

2. What are the main differences between a poster and an oral presentation?

The main difference is the way information is delivered. In a poster, the content is static and can be absorbed visually. Viewers can interpret the information at their own pace and refer back to it when needed. An oral presentation, on the other hand, involves a live performance where the presenter delivers information verbally. This format allows for direct interaction with the audience, the use of visual aids, and the ability to adapt the delivery based on audience reactions. Another difference is the level of preparation required. Posters typically require more time for design and visual arrangement, while oral presentations require more time rehearsing and practicing engaging delivery.

3. Are there any advantages to using a poster instead of an oral presentation?

Yes, there are several advantages to using a poster. Posters are highly visual and can convey complex information in an easily digestible manner. They allow viewers to study the content at their own pace and can be used as reference material even after the presentation. Posters are also ideal for situations where there is limited time for presentations or if the presenter prefers a more hands-off approach. Additionally, posters can be displayed in public areas even after the event, reaching a wider audience and serving as a long-lasting visual representation of the topic.

4. Can an oral presentation be more engaging than a poster?

Yes, an oral presentation can often be more engaging than a poster. Oral presentations allow for direct interaction with the audience, enabling the presenter to capture their attention and convey information using gestures, voice modulation, and visual aids. Presenters can also adapt their delivery based on audience reactions and engage the audience through questions, discussions, or interactive activities. Additionally, the live nature of an oral presentation allows for the presenter’s enthusiasm and passion for the topic to shine through, making it more memorable and impactful for the audience.

5. Can a poster and an oral presentation be used together?

Absolutely! Combining a poster and an oral presentation can be a powerful way to enhance the impact of your message. By creating a visually appealing poster that provides an overview of the topic, you can effectively capture the audience’s attention. Then, during the oral presentation, you can dive deeper into the content, providing additional insights, anecdotes, and engaging the audience in an interactive discussion. This combination allows for the best of both worlds, offering the visual appeal and reference value of a poster, along with the dynamic engagement of an oral presentation.

Poster Presenting Tips : Cal NERDS’ Student Research Poster Presenting Tips

So, to sum it all up, when it comes to presenting information, there are two main options: posters and oral presentations. Posters are like visual aids that can help you explain your ideas with pictures, graphs, and text. On the other hand, oral presentations involve speaking to an audience and sharing your thoughts and information out loud.

Both methods have their advantages and disadvantages. Posters can be a great way to showcase your creativity and make your ideas visual. They allow your audience to take their time and study the information on their own. However, they might not provide enough explanation and can limit your ability to interact with your audience.

Oral presentations, on the other hand, give you a chance to engage with your audience directly. You can use your voice, gestures, and expressions to convey your message. However, they require more preparation and can be nerve-wracking for some people.

In the end, the best method for presenting information depends on your personal style and the situation. If you’re a visual person who likes to express yourself through images and graphs, posters might be your go-to. If you enjoy speaking and connecting with others, oral presentations might be a better fit.

Remember, it’s not about picking a winner between the two, but rather about choosing the method that works best for you and effectively communicates your ideas. So, whether you choose to create a poster or give an oral presentation, embrace the opportunity to share your knowledge and let your creativity shine!

Similar Posts

How to Make a Good Digital Poster?

To make a good digital poster, create a visually appealing design with clear and concise messaging. In today’s digital age, posters play a crucial role in engaging and attracting target audiences. Whether you are promoting an event, product, or service, it is essential to create a digital poster that captures attention and conveys your message…

How to Introduce Group Members in a Presentation Script

In a presentation script, introduce group members by briefly stating their names and roles. In this introduction, we will discuss the best ways to introduce group members in a presentation script, ensuring clarity and engagement with the audience. A well-crafted introduction can set the tone for a successful presentation. When introducing group members, it is…

How to Improve Presentation Skills?

To improve presentation skills, focus on understanding the purpose of the presentation and use visual aids to support your message effectively. By preparing thoroughly and engaging the audience, you can deliver a compelling and impactful presentation that leaves a lasting impression. With practice and appropriate dress, you can boost your confidence and connect with your…

What are the Types of Online Presentations?

There are two types of online presentations: live presentations and recorded presentations. Live presentations are delivered in real-time, while recorded presentations are pre-recorded and made available for on-demand viewing. Online presentations offer a convenient and flexible way to share information, engage with an audience, and deliver a compelling message. They can be used for various…

Speech Vs Presentation: Get The Main Difference In 2023

In the world of communication, there are different ways we express ourselves: through speeches and presentations. But wait, what’s the difference between a speech and a presentation? Let’s break it down! Imagine you’re standing in front of an audience, sharing your thoughts and ideas. That’s a speech! It’s like having a conversation with a large…

What is Animation in Digital Slides?

Animation in digital slides refers to the use of moving images and visual effects to enhance the presentation of content. It adds dynamic elements and engages the audience by bringing static slides to life. This technique captures attention, conveys complex ideas more effectively, and creates a visually appealing experience for viewers. With animation, slides can…

Customize Your Path

Filters Applied

Customize Your Experience.

Utilize the "Customize Your Path" feature to refine the information displayed in myRESEARCHpath based on your role, project inclusions, sponsor or funding, and management center.

Poster and oral presentations

Need assistance with poster presentations?

Get help with poster presentations.

Contact the Research Navigators:

• Email:  [email protected]

Poster and oral presentations are typically delivered to academic colleagues at conferences or congresses. Here are some best practices and resources to help develop the content and visuals for a high-impact poster, and plan and practice memorable oral presentations. 

The "Related Resources" on this page can be used to tap into Duke’s hub of templates, guides, and services to support researchers developing their presentations.

The Duke Medical Center Library has tips for things to keep in mind before working through the development of a poster presentation, and the Duke University Libraries' Center for Data and Visualization Sciences recorded a talk on preparing effective academic posters .

• Just like with any other publication, the specifications from the conference should be read and understood – there are often size limits or font requirements to keep in mind.
• A good title is critical for posters since presenters get just a few seconds to attract conference goers who are passing by. Make sure the title briefly and memorably portrays the most interesting or central finding of the work.
• Energy should be focused on a solid abstract, as the poster is simply a blown-up visualization of that summary.
• Less is more in poster design. Rather than shrinking fonts to fit the commentary, the commentary should be shrunk to fit the space on the poster, while retaining a readable font and plenty of white space.  

The Thompson Writing Program has great general guidance on oral presentations, summarized throughout this page. There are several training opportunities listed in this page's "Related Resources" that can help researchers at all stages to hone their presentation skills.

• Preparing for an oral presentation will take the majority of a researcher's time. The goal of the talk should be fully understood as typically no more than 3-5 key points will be covered in a presentation; the audience and the time allotted should be carefully considered.
• Consideration of “guideposts” for the audience should be given. It is especially important in oral deliveries that information is organized in to meaningful blocks for the audience. Transitions should be emphasized during the presentation.
• Rather than creating a word-for-word speech, researchers should create a plan for each section, idea or point. By reading written points, delivery can be kept fresh.
• To engage audiences, it is a good idea to make strongest points first, and in a memorable way. While background and introduction sections are common in academic presentations, they are often already known to the audience.

The Duke Medical Center Library has tutorials, best practices for general design, and strategies for a high-impact poster presentations. Bass Connections also provides guidance on poster design.

Some important things to keep in mind are:

• Keeping posters simple and focusing on two things: Strong visualizations and small blocks of supporting text. Remember the audience; they will be standing a few feet away. Make sure the content is visible from afar. 
• Follow brand guidelines from Duke or Duke School of Medicine . When representing Duke at a conference, it is best practice to align the presentation with institutional standards, including appropriate logos and color schemes.
• Avoid violating copyright protections. Include only images created specifically for this purpose, or use stock photography provided by Duke or other vendors.
• Visualizing data tells the story. The Center for Data and Visualization Sciences has workshops, consultations and other resources to ensure that graphical representations of data are effective.
• Poster presentations can be designed using a variety of software (PowerPoint, Illustrator, Keynote, Inkscape), and templates. When choosing software or templates, consideration should be given to accessibility and understanding by everyone involved in creating the presentation.   
• Contact information, citations and acknowledgements: On posters, key articles may be noted or images needing references included. For oral and poster presentations, key contributors should be recognized. Funding sources should also be mentioned on posters and in oral presentations.
• A link or QR code should be included for supplemental materials, citations, movies, etc.
• Before a poster is printed, someone with fresh eyes should review it! Reprinting posters is costly and can take time. There are many options for printing, some on paper and some on fabric, with production times varying. The Medical Center Library has some local options to suggest. 
• Practicing in a space that is similar to the actual presentation is a good idea, and doing so within the allotted time. Finishing early to allow good Q&A is also a good idea.
• Family, trusted friends, or colleagues can be great test audiences, and can provide valuable feedback.
• Preparation and practice should be started early and repeated often.
• If it is an important address, researchers may want to videotape a rehearsal run to review and improve performance.
• If a presentation is being digitized, release or permission forms may be needed. Duke has resources available via Scholarworks.
• Once a poster session or oral presentation has been completed, researchers should be sure to add it to their CV or biosketch.

Mastering the Art of Presentations: Oral vs. Poster

When it comes to presenting research findings at academic conferences, researchers often face a choice: should they present their paper orally or in poster format? Both formats offer unique advantages and cater to different styles of communication and audience engagement. Here’s a closer look at oral and poster presentations to help you decide which route might be the best for sharing your work.

• Engagement: Oral sessions facilitate direct interaction with the audience, allowing for immediate feedback and questions.
• Visibility: Being a speaker can increase your visibility in your field, especially if your session is well-attended.
• Comprehensive Detail: This format enables a thorough explanation of complex concepts and nuances that a poster might not convey.
• Nerve-Wracking: For many, speaking in front of an audience can be daunting.
• Time Constraints: You’re limited to your allocated slot, which can sometimes rush the presentation of complex research.
• Scheduling Conflicts: Attendees might miss your presentation due to sessions overlap.
• Prepare for the Q&A: Anticipate questions that might arise and practice concise responses. Engage with your audience by encouraging questions and offering clear thoughtful answers.
• Practice Your Speech: Rehearse your presentation multiple times at home, ensuring you can comfortably fit within the time slot without rushing. Consider recording yourself to refine your delivery and timing.
• Flexibility: Viewers can peruse posters at their leisure, leading to more personalized interactions.
• Feedback Opportunities: The setting encourages detailed discussions and feedback on specific aspects of your research.
• Less Intimidating: For those apprehensive about public speaking, posters can be a more comfortable format.
• Limited Exposure: Posters might attract less attention than a scheduled talk, especially if the hall is crowded or poorly located.
• Space Constraints: You have to condense your research into an engaging poster, which can be challenging.
• Physical Presence Required: You must stand by your poster during the session, which can be time consuming.
• Attach Business Cards: Make it easy for attendees to take your contact information by attaching business cards to your poster.
• Print Small Handouts: Offering handouts that summarize your research can help attendees remember your work and follow up after the conference.
• Language Considerations: Posters are a good option for presenters who are not fluent in the official language of the event. They allow for more controlled, one-on-one interactions where language barriers can be more easily navigated.

More from the Blog

• Creating Inclusive Conferences: Best Practices for Diversity and Accessibility
• Navigating Academic Waters: How to Identify (Non-) Legitimate Conferences
• How to Choose the Right Academic Conference: A Practical Guide

Posters & Oral Presentations

Good scientific research involves a sound methodology and a novel idea that can be tested simply and repeatedly to give valid, trustworthy results. However, even the most clinically significant research is useless if it is not communicated successfully. Scientific ideas are novel, sometimes simple in theory, but most always complex in technique. These attributes of research make it necessary to use all available means of presentation. The most common media for scientists to communicate with the general public is primary journal articles. However, posters and oral presentations are also affective because they allow scientists to be in direct contact with their audience. This provides both parties an opportunity to ask pertinent questions to add clarity to the work being presented.

A poster is an exciting way for scientists to present their research. It, just as a primary research article, includes all aspects of the scientific method. A title that is brief, but specific, an abstract, an introduction, material and methods, results, and a conclusion are some headings that can appear on a poster. Also, references and acknowledgments are sometimes are included. A poster is different from a written manuscript or an oral presentation because it is mostly graphical. As such, it is important to design a poster that is visually pleasing by focusing on charts, graphs, and pictures and minimizing lengthy introductions and discussions. Highlighting all significant information with the use of bullets is essential because if further explanation is needed the audience will simply ask for it.

Oral presentations are yet another avenue for scientists to share their findings with the world. Although it can be challenging to present years of works within fifteen minutes, oral presentations can be a rewarding experience because you are the only one front of an audience whose attention you know have. Of course this emphasizes the need to speak clearly and concisely with choice words that engross the audience. Again, just as with written manuscript and posters the format of oral presentations can also vary, but essentially it must include logical, easy-to-understand events that are presented in a matter with respect to the scientific method.

Electronic Resources

Poster Presentation http://www.ncsu.edu/project/posters

This is an excellent site that covers all aspects of a poster presentation from creating a poster to presenting one. It also provides several examples with critiques for each sample. Lastly, it has a quick reference page with helpful tips for delivering a successful poster presentation.

Oral Presentation http://www.kumc.edu/SAH/OTEd/jradel/Preparing_talks/103.html

This site is cited by the NIH and is quite useful when designing an oral presentation. It addresses all aspects of a scientific talk from planning and preparing to practicing and presenting. It is brief and easy to follow with helpful tips on how to prepare for the question/answer session.

Document Resources  

Scientific Poster: Tips, Significance, Design, Templates and Presentation

This document provides tips and temples for designing a poster presentation. It also discusses the significance of a poster presentation and includes a section that gives advice on how to present successfully.

Oral Presentations: Tips, Significance, Design, Guidelines & Presentation

This document provides tips and guidelines for designing an oral presentation. It also discusses the significance of an oral presentation and includes a section that gives advice on how to present successfully.

University Library, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Research Posters

• Elements of a poster
• Step by step
• Visualizations & images
• Illinois logo
• Archiving - Grad Students
• More Resources

TIPS FOR ORAL PRESENTATIONS

The speaking center.

• CONSIDERING YOUR CONTENT
• PRESENTATION DELIVERY
• 2024 Undergraduate Research Symposium This link opens in a new window
• How to give a great oral presentation
• Ten Simple Rules for Making Good Oral Presentations
• Top 15 tips to give a good oral presentation
• Designing PowerPoint Slides for a Scientific Presentation

The Library offers speaking consultation and practice at the  The Speaking Center . Schedule an appointment with us and practice giving your presentation. 

• << Previous: More Resources
• Next: 2024 Undergraduate Research Symposium >>
• Last Updated: May 13, 2024 2:05 PM
• URL: https://guides.library.illinois.edu/poster

Preparing Oral and Poster Presentations

• First Online: 02 March 2024

Cite this chapter

• Kimberly M. Rathbun 5  

23 Accesses

A poster or oral presentation is a great way to share your research project and get feedback. Designing a poster or preparing an oral presentation should be done within the guidelines set forth by the conference. Traditional posters and oral presentations convey the same information in different formats. When presenting your study, you should know all the details of the project and be able to field any questions from the audience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

• Available as PDF
• Read on any device
• Instant download
• Own it forever
• Available as EPUB and PDF
• Compact, lightweight edition
• Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
• Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Suggested Readings

Barker E, Phillips V. Creating conference posters: structure, form and content. J Perioper Pract. 2021;31(7–8):296–9.

PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Gundogan B, Koshy K, Kurar L, Whitehurst K. How to make an academic poster. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2016;11:69–71.

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Naegle KM. Ten simple rules for effective presentation slides. PLoS Comput Biol. 2021;17(12):e1009554.

Article   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Emergency Medicine, AU/UGA Medical Partnership, Athens, GA, USA

Kimberly M. Rathbun

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kimberly M. Rathbun .

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

Emergency Medicine, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA

Robert P. Olympia

Elizabeth Barrall Werley

Jeffrey S. Lubin

MD Anderson Cancer Center at Cooper, Cooper Medical School of Rowan University, Camden, NJ, USA

Kahyun Yoon-Flannery

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Rathbun, K.M. (2023). Preparing Oral and Poster Presentations. In: Olympia, R.P., Werley, E.B., Lubin, J.S., Yoon-Flannery, K. (eds) An Emergency Physician’s Path. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47873-4_79

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47873-4_79

Published : 02 March 2024

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-031-47872-7

Online ISBN : 978-3-031-47873-4

eBook Packages : Medicine Medicine (R0)

Share this chapter

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

Want to create or adapt books like this? Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing practices.

21 Poster Presentations

Read time: 8 minutes

This section will outline how to communicate your scientific research in the format of a poster presentation, and provide guidance on designing your poster.

Sections in this chapter

Environment and audience, poster vs. talk, verbal aspect, poster design, virtual posters.

Many conferences have poster presentation sessions along with oral presentations. The poster presentation is a format introduced into the American Chemical Society meetings in the 1970s. This format allows more people the opportunity to present their work since many posters can be scheduled for the same time period and in one large room.

The format of a poster presentation allows for a one-on-one and in-depth discussion between the presenter and viewer. For this reason, poster sessions are often combined with social mixers, where people can walk around and browse the posters.

Theoretically, the poster audience is more broad and diverse, since many disciplines present in one large room. For this reason, your poster should be readable or understandable in less than 5 minutes by someone not in your field, who has only general knowledge of the research area. People browse posters and look for something that interests them, and on average spend around 90 seconds viewing a single poster. However, the people who actually attend your poster will likely be those who are interested in your work or work in a similar area.

Attaching business cards and one-page copies of your poster allow viewers to contact you later and get the information without having to take notes.

Table 21.1. Differences between posters and oral presentations (talks)

Posters are mostly non-verbal and visual, so most of this chapter will discuss poster design. However, the verbal aspect of the poster presentation is where many presenters struggle! The most common mistake is for presenters to launch into a detailed overview of the slides, starting at the introduction and working their way through the poster all the way to the acknowledgements. Even a 5-minute overview is too long at a poster! The issue with this approach is that the viewer cannot listen to you and think critically at the same time, and they lose the autonomy of exploring your visuals at their own pace. Follow these tips for a successful poster presentation:

• If someone shows interest in your poster, smile and introduce yourself, then wait.
• If they start to intently view your poster, let them do this silently without interruption.
• If they turn to you, ask if they would like a short overview of your work.
• Start with the key finding, from your conclusion, and state it in a single sentence.
• Then move on to your motivation and methods and details about the results.
• Make sure to pause and make eye contact, which will let viewers ask questions.
• Ask your viewer questions to gauge their interest and background, and encourage discussion
• Point to relevant things on your poster as you present.

There are some aspects of etiquette to giving poster presentations. First of all, you should be at your poster during the specified times. Socializing with friends should be a lower priority, so if your lab members are hanging around your poster you can politely ask them to give you some space. Stay tuned to social cues from your viewer, and let them view the poster silently if they seem to want that. Lastly, consider waiting until after the presentation for drinks.

Format and Size

Posters should be concise, organized, and self-explanatory: the best way to achieve this is to have a central and obvious message. Beyond that, a poster should be easy to view from 1-2 meters away, which means you should limit text to short paragraphs (<20 lines) or bullet points. Remember that you are not writing a full paper! Any text should be in a simple Sans-Serif typeface ( e.g., Arial, Verdana, Calibri) with adequate spacing, and large enough to easily read. Consider using a different font style for the title and headings than the main text. Follow this guide for minimum text sizes:

Title 100 pt (Verdana, bold)

Authors 36 pt (Arial, bold)

Headings 54 pt (Verdana, bold)

Main text 32 pt (Arial)

References 28 point (Arial)

Instead of text, use figures, graphs, and charts to visually communicate of your work. Make sure the text labels and axes are large enough to easily read, following the guide above.

Check the conference website for instructions on the acceptable dimensions for posters. The typically allowed dimensions are 90 cm (36”) high x  122 cm (48”) wide. There are two ways to create your poster (Figure 21.1): 1) print 12-20 regular slides on 8.5″ x 11″ pieces of paper, and arrange them; 2) create a single large poster sheet, either printed on paper or fabric, to fill the whole space.

Posters have all the components of a paper, organized into sections. These sections are not always separate on your poster (see below ‘Layout’), but they should be present in one way or another. See Table 21.2. for a list of sections and their descriptions.

Table 21.2. Poster sections

Sections in your poster are outlined by headings. Instead of using section titles like “Introduction”, use descriptive headings that tell the viewer the key message of the section (Table 21.3).

Table 21.3. Replacing poster headings with descriptive headings

Layout & Design

A thoughtful layout will provide a natural flow that guides people through your poster.  It is best to arrange your poster in blocks of columns, so that the audience reads from left to right, top to bottom using “reader’s gravity”. You can number each section block or heading to help the reader to follow the flow of the material. 

Posters with symmetric layouts and plenty of ‘white space’ are more visually pleasing, and can also help with flow. Also, place graphics and text to create a symmetrical balance.

Instead of headings like “Introduction”, use descriptive headings to clearly communicate your main points. A lack of headings, plus an asymmetric layout of the material, makes it difficult for the viewer to follow the flow or find a particular section of the poster.

A popular traditional poster format (see Figure 21.2) has a landscape layout and three columns: 1) Introduction and Methods, 25% width; 2) Results arena, 50% Width; 3) Conclusions and Acknowledgements, 25% width. A more modern landscape layout (Figure 21.3) was designed by Mike Morrison , [1] which features a large takeaway sidebar with the key message, and a QR code that links to the paper or a website. This modern poster format also works well in a portrait format (Figure 21.4).

Stick to a theme of 2 or 3 colours, using an accessible colour scheme , and be consistent with the use of colours that have meaning (e.g.,  in legends). Don’t be afraid to use b right colours to attract attention, but if you overuse them you will wear out readers’ eyes. For the body of your poster, use a light coloured background and dark coloured text. Dark backgrounds with light letters can become tiring to read but are often used for headings.

Don’t start from scratch

There are many poster templates available online! Here are some PowerPoint templates and guides:

BetterPosters.blogspot.com landscape template

BetterPosters.blogspot.com portrait template

BetterPosters.blogspot.com Twitter template

Queen’s Chemistry Landscape Poster Template

Queen’s Chemistry Portrait Poster Template

Online conferences and symposia are becoming more common, including virtual poster sessions. Virtual posters can have animations, videos, and audio narration. These posters can take many formats, but one common format is for the RSC Poster  Day on Twitter. They published this guide to creating a version of your poster on Twitter, and how to identify your work using the right hashtag ( e.g., #RSCOrganic, #RSCAnalytical).

Here are some links to the 2020 winners of #RSCPoster Day.

Super excited to share my research on the use of electrochemistry as a tool for drug detection in complex matrices as a #comicsforscience for my first #RSCPoster #RSCAnalytical #RSCPhys #electrochem @DennanyChem @PamelaAllanChem @CarnegieUni @StrathChem @StrathForensics pic.twitter.com/ISzJ55Hbqh — Kelly Brown (@kellybrown_94) March 3, 2020

Excited to share my first #RSCPoster and looking forward to interact with all the #chemtweeps to discuss magnetic photocatalysis 🧲💡 #RSCCat #RSCNano #RSCMat pic.twitter.com/XzwxnIYJyh — Julio Terra, Ph.D. (@_julioterra) March 3, 2020

Here we go again! NEON can deny, oops I mean no-one can deny Hydrogen's BRIGHT future for renewable energy! Here is my fun twist on my LIGHT weight hydrogen storage for mobile fuel cell applications research at @lborouniversity @LboroScience #RSCEnergy #RSCPoster pic.twitter.com/8DzRUHobiA — Lizzie Ashton (@LizzieRAshton) March 3, 2020

• " Critique: The Morrison billboard poster ", Zen Faulkes, April 11, 2019, Better Posters. Accessed 2020-08-31 ↵

Principles of Scientific Communication Copyright © 2020 by Amanda Bongers and Donal Macartney is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book

Preparing oral and poster presentations for conferences

As a PhD student, attending conferences is an exciting part of academic life. Conferences are a chance to share your research findings, learn novel ideas or techniques and travel, whether that is locally, further afield or even internationally. A crucial aspect to conference attending is conveying your research to the wider scientific community, through either a poster or oral presentation.

Preparing your research to present at a conference is a balance. You need to include the same details as you would put in a paper or report, but make it concise to fit reasonably in a poster format, or within a specific talk length, such as 10 minutes. When writing a talk or poster for a specific conference, investigating the style and content of previous years abstracts may help to peg yours at a suitable level. Before you start, check the conference guidelines on oral presentation outlines, poster size, and orientation. Although most conferences allow A0 portrait posters, some are different and it’s advisable to check this before writing.

Preparing your poster

Generally, posters follow a bullet point style divided into four main sections:

• Introduction or Background
• Discussion or Conclusions.

However, there are some other areas of the poster that need attention too.

Firstly, a snappy title is a must. The title must cover the basic outline of the study, yet be intriguing, making the viewer want to read on. The title must be considered during abstract preparation, as whatever you name your abstract will be your poster title. Author names and affiliations sit below the title; the order of this can be important but must be agreed by your research group before poster publication.

The introduction covers the background details of the research involved, using current literature and references. The aims and objectives of the research must be in the introduction, and generally sits well at the end just before the method section to give a sense of flow.

Methods covers obviously what you did to achieve your results. It’s good to be aware of any ethical approval gained for the study, and noting participant numbers, genders and ages, statistical methods used and any chemical in their full unabbreviated names initially, with subsequent references to the ingredients by the standard abbreviations. If the method is tricky to explain, a diagram or photo may help to illustrate, and it is not necessary to repeat the methods in words.

The results section needs to cover all relevant findings. Tables or figures can really help show data, so be imaginative! You’ll need to include statistical p-values to show significances. Finally, the discussion or conclusion section highlights the key findings from your results in punchy language as a ‘take home message’. These need to be clear and concise, covering the exact findings and if possible the relevance of findings to the study and scientific community as a whole.

Oral presentations

For oral presentations the same headings should be followed, with clear simple slides. Keep the number of slides to a minimum to keep the length of the talk on track. A good guideline is around one slide per minute. Set the scene with a clear introduction to the work, indicating the relevance of the study to the general scientific community. Highlight the study aims and objectives, and unlike a poster, you may want to include a hypothesis for further clarity. Diagrams may also help to describe methodology, and helps to keep audience attention as they must listen to you fully to understand the technique.

Results can also be shown on graphs and figures; be careful with tables, as these can appear daunting to the viewer, unless you clearly highlight the numbers or significances of importance to your work. Throughout the results section explain what each experiment or figure means, what is the finding? This will help you lead directly into the conclusions, and you can repeat the key findings already covered in the results, and give a clear take home message to your audience.

And finally...

Whether you’re giving a poster or a talk at a conference, be confident. Who knows your work better than you? This will help you tackle any questions and comments posed, and give you a chance to meet fellow researchers and possible future collaborators. Project your voice, face your audience and above all enjoy yourself!

Dr Caroline Withers

Get the Reddit app

Have the option of doing an oral presentation or a poster at my first conference. what would you recommend..

I'm a junior in undergrad and I want to get as much as I can out of this opportunity, but I also do want to royally mess anything up.

Poster vs Oral Presentation

Aug 10, 2014

450 likes | 1.52k Views

Poster Preparation more costly and time-consuming Opportunity to interact with audience Possible to develop collaborations with co-presenters Considered less prestigious than oral presentation at some conferences. Oral Quick preparation at no cost

Share Presentation

• menten substrate
• medium type
• our mutagenesis studies
• oral presentation

Presentation Transcript

Poster Preparation more costly and time-consuming Opportunity to interact with audience Possible to develop collaborations with co-presenters Considered less prestigious than oral presentation at some conferences Oral Quick preparation at no cost Little interaction with audience outside of 5 min Q&A Little time to discuss project with co-presenters Oral presentations are sometimes chosen as the best in that area Poster vs Oral Presentation

Text on poster must be legible from a viewing distance of 6 feet. • For section headings (e.g., Introduction), use boldface, maybe about 36-42 point. For supporting text (e.g., text within each section & figure captions), use about 24-28 point (boldface, if appropriate). • In general, use font sizes proportional to importance: • largest type - Title • next largest type - Section headings • medium type - Supporting material • smallest type - Details • If you have your poster made at MUSM, Elizabeth Hyde in Illustration will properly size the text for you from the Word and PowerPoint files that you send her by email: • [email protected]

TITLE, AUTHORS, INSTITUTIONS Differences in the Kinetics of Substrate Utilization by Human Type 1 and Type 2 3β-Hydroxy-steroid Dehydrogenase (3β-HSD) are Structurally Characterized by the Type 1 Chimera, H156Y. James L. Thomas1*, J. Ian Mason2, Stacey Brandt1 and Wendy Norris1 1Division of Basic Medical Sciences, Mercer University School of Medicine, Macon, GA, 31207 and 2Department of Reproductive & Developmental Sciences (Clinical Biochemistry), University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.

ABSTRACT Two distinct genes encode the 93% homologous human type 1 (placenta, mammary gland, prostate) and type 2 (gonads, adrenals) isoforms of 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase/isomerase (3β-HSD/isomerase). Our mutagenesis studies using the type 1 enzyme have produced the Y154F and K158Q mutant enzymes in the Y154-P-H156-S-K158 motif that is present in the primary structure of the human type 13β-HSD/isomerase. In addition, the H156Y mutant of the type 1 enzyme has been created to produce a chimera of the type 2 enzyme motif (Y154-P-Y156-S-K158) in the type 1 enzyme. The wild-type 1 and 2 enzymes plus these three mutants were expressed and purified to homogeneity. Michaelis-Menten constants of substrate conversion were measured for each purified enzyme. The wild-type 2 Km value for dehydroepiandrosterone is 12.7-fold greater and the Vmax is 1.9-fold greater than those values measured for the wild-type 13β-HSD activity. The H156Y type 1 mutant has kinetic constants for 3β-HSD activity that are very similar to those of the wild-type 2 enzyme. In contrast, the kinetic values measured for the isomerization of 5-androstene-3,17-dione by the H156Y type 1 mutant are almost identical to those measured for the wild-type 1 isomerase. The Y154F and K158Q type 1 mutants exhibit no 3β-HSD activity and have Km values that are similar to the wild-type 1 isomerase values. Thus, a structural basis for the difference in the substrate kinetics of the wild-type 1 and 2 3β-HSD and the critical residues for the3β-HSD reaction have been identified. This significant advance in our understanding of the structure/function of human type 1 and 2 3β-HSD/isomerase may lead to the selective inhibition of the type 1 enzyme not only in placenta to control the onset of labor but also in prostate and breast tumors to slow their hormone-dependent growth.(Supported by NIH grant HD20055, JLT)

Clinical Abstract: OBJECTIVES: (1) Characterize serum (S) and urinary (U) steroid metabolites in complete CYP17 deficiency (cCYP17D); (2) analyze the relative 17α-hydroxylase (17OH) and 17,20-lyase (17,20L) activities in vivo; and (3) comparedata from the two most prevalent mutations in Brazil. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: 20 genotyped cCYP17D patients from a previously reported cohort were homozygous for W406R or R362C; 11 controls were CYP17 wild types (WT). WT and cCYP17D patients had S and U samples drawn to measure: cortisol (F), corticosterone (B), deoxycorticosterone (DOC), 18OH-B, 18OH-DOC, and 17OHP; and tetrahydro (TH)-B, THA, THDOC, THF+5α-THF, TH-cortisone, androsterone, etiocholanolone, 5-pregnenediol, 17OH-pregnenolone and pregnanetriol. RESULTS: Compared to WT, cCYP17D patients had marked elevations of B, DOC, 18OH-B and 18OH-DOC, whereas 17OHP, F and adrenal androgens (AA) were reduced; U steroids parallel S findings. Metabolite ratios revealed that both 17OH and 17,20L activities were impaired in cCYP17D. There were nodifferences between W406R andR362C mutations. CONCLUSIONS: cCYP17D patients show parallel overproduction/overexcretion of 17-deoxysteroids, and marked reduction of F and AA. In addition to 17OH, 17,20-L activity was also impaired in cCYP17D. W406 and R362C mutations disclose similar Sand U patterns.

Purposes or INTRODUCTION • Describe the purposes of the study • Three main points • Significance of study

PURPOSES • Produce and express the human wild-type 1 (placenta, breast tumors, prostate tumors) and wild-type 2 (adrenals, gonads) 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase isomerase (3β-HSD/isomerase) as well as potentially critical mutant forms of the type 1 enzyme. • Purify each enzyme and compare the substrate and cofactor kinetics of the 3β-HSD and isomerase activities of the wild-type 1 and wild-type 2 enzymes as well as the mutants of the type 1 enzyme. • The H156Y mutation creates the type 2 catalytic motif (Y154-P-Y156-S-K158) in the type 1 enzyme (Y154-P-H156-S-K158). The Y-X-X-S-K motif is responsible for the enzyme activity of several hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases. This structural difference may be the basis for the selective inhibition of human type 1 3β-HSD.

INTRODUCTION The human type 1 isoform (breast tumors, placenta) of 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase/isomerase (3β-HSD1) is a key enzyme in the steroidogenic pathway leading to the production of estradiol. Human 3β-HSD2 is selectively expressed in the adrenal glands and ovaries in the female.The goals of this project are to evaluate whether Arg195 in 3β-HSD1 vs Pro195 in 3β-HSD2 is a critical structural difference responsible for the inhibition of 3β-HSD1 by trilostane with 16-fold higher-affinity compared to 3β-HSD2 and to determine if a 16β-hydroxyl group on DHEA increases the affinity of 3β-HSD1, but not of 3β-HSD2, for substrates. Using our structural PDB file of human 3β-HSD1, docking of the inhibitor, trilostane, and substrates, DHEA and 16β-hydroxy-DHEA, with 3β-HSD1 has predicted that Arg195 in 3β-HSD1 interacts with the steroid 16,17-oxo groups and that Pro195 in 3β-HSD2 does not. To test this prediction, the R195P-1 mutant of 3β-HSD1 and the P195R-2 mutant of 3β-HSD2 have been created, expressed, purified and characterized kinetically.

SIGNIFICANCE Human 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase is a key enzyme in the biosynthesis of active steroid hormones which is expressed as two tissue-specific isoforms. Because 3β-HSD1 is expressed in placenta and breast tumors, and 3β-HSD2 is expressed in the adrenal glands, it may be possible to selectively inhibit 3β-HSD1 in placenta to control the timing of labor or in breast tumors to slow their growth without affecting the essential steroidogenic activity of adrenal 3β-HSD2. Note: Significance can be incorporated into the Introduction without having a separate section.

CYP17 Pregnenolone 17-OH-Pregnenolone DHEA HUMAN 3b-HYDROXYSTEROID DEHYDROGENASE/ISOMERASE Type 1 3-HSD in placenta and hormone-sensitive tumors Type 2 3-HSD in adrenal cortex Progesterone 17b-HSD CYP19, 17b-HSD CYP21, CYP11B2 CYP21, CYP11B1 CYP19 17b-Estradiol Testosterone Cortisol Aldosterone Schematic showing significance

Figure 1. Subunit interface of human 3b-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase showing interactions between key amino acids.

3b-HSD2 3b-HSD1 H156Y Y154F Y158Q Figure 3. Western blot of an SDS-polyacrylamide gel shows expression of the mutant enzymes by baculovirus. The Sf9 cell homogenates (1.5 μg each) contained Y154F, K158Q, or H156Y. Purified wild-type 1 and wild-type 2 3-HSD/isomerase (0.05 g each) served as controls.

Figure 3. Dixon analysis of the inhibition of MCF-7 3β-HSD1 and MCF-7 3β-HSD2 cell homogenates (0.3 mg) by epostane (0-0.75 mM, 3β-HSD1; 0-7.5 mM, 3β-HSD2).

Table 2. Comparison of inhibition constants of trilostane for purified human R195P-1, 3b-HSD1, P195R-2 and 3b-HSD2. Enzyme Trilostane Ki (M) 1 R195P-1 2.56 ± 0.22 3b-HSD1 0.10 ± 0.01 (C) P195R-2 0.19 ± 0.02 (C) 3b-HSD2 1.60 ± 0.10 1 For 3-HSD1 and P195R-2, the incubations contained sub-saturating concentrations of DHEA (4.0 μM or 8.0 M), NAD+ (0.2 mM), purified human 3-HSD type 1 enzyme (0.04 mg) and trilostane (0-1.0 M) in 0.02 M potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4. For 3β-HSD2 and R195P-1, similar incubations contained DHEA (8.0 μM or 20.0 μM) and trilostane (0-7.5 M). Dixon analysis (I versus 1/V) was used to determine the mode of inhibition and calculate the Ki values. (C) denotes a competitive mode of inhibition, and no notation indicates a noncompetitive mode of inhibition.

CONCLUSIONS • The Y154F and K158Q mutations abolished the 3β-HSD activity and significant isomerase activity was retained. Therefore, Tyr154 and Lys158 are essential for 3b-HSD activity and may be catalytic residues. • The H156Y mutation of the type 1 enzyme shifted the Michaelis-Menten substrate kinetic profile for 3β-HSD1 to that of the 3β-HSD2 (12-fold higher Km, 2-fold higher Vmax). • The H156vs Y156 structure/function relationship is responsible for the substantially higher affinity of type 1 3β-HSD for substrate and inhibitor steroids compared to the type 2 3β-HSD.

FORMAT OF POSTER • Single large poster • Separate Panels

Pros Cons  Looks more professional (perhaps this is debatable?) Requires access to specialized printers (or Kinkos)  Rolls easily for storage and travel (especially if laminated) Expensive to print (especially if you notice a typo!)  Becoming increasingly popular and perhaps even expected   More difficult to create More flexibility in arranging items (not boxed into small chunks of information) in terms of the overall picture Less flexibility in the long run (less likely to be usable for another conference if, for example, the poster boards at one meeting are horizontal but at another are vertical)  Can easily make handouts identical to your poster  Large Single Poster

Pros Cons Less expensive to print overall and easier to reprint section by section in case of typos. Can be prepared yourself without a special printer. Looks less professional if not well done Easier to transport because pieces fit in your briefcase (title-boards can be hinged together to fold compactly) Shorter shelf life than a laminated poster Easier to design; can even be arranged differently at meeting More flexible (easily used at other conferences; in different layouts)  Multiple Small Panels

HANDOUT • 1-2 page handout in manila envelope attached to poster board. • Print the single large poster as an 8.5 x 11 inch sheet. • Gives viewers something to take home who may contact you later.

• More by User

Oral presentation

300 hospital case histories patients after surgical operations were chosen, randomized, in 2000 year and ... Practice antibiotic use in surgical department of state and private ...

447 views • 17 slides

Oral Presentation

Oral Presentation. Ted Strickland Governor of Ohio Deborah S. Delisle Superintendent of Public Instruction Marilyn Troyer Deputy Superintendent, Ohio Department of Education Gene T. Harris Superintendent, Columbus City Schools James Mahoney Executive Director, Battelle for Kids.

235 views • 11 slides

Poster Presentation

Poster Presentation. Modes of Communication. Written (i.e. paper / article) – good for detail; time to digest; possible to include complex material Clear beginning, middle and end; Reader can combine with other sources of information to clarify anything that is not clear

543 views • 41 slides

Poster Presentation. Anthony V Moorman Roy Russell Richy Hetherington Elizabeta Mukaetova-Ladinska. Overview of Session. Interactive section Review posters in 9 groups of 5 people; focussing on different elements of the posters around the room (15-20min)

469 views • 35 slides

Poster Presentation. Anthony V Moorman Roy Russell Richy Hetherington Elizabeta Mukaetova-Ladinska. Overview of Session. Talk Review communication modes in science Advantages and disadvantages of posters Features of a good poster Tips and hints Interactive section

570 views • 40 slides

Oral and Poster Presentations

Oral and Poster Presentations. Poster Presentations Less formal – but ? More targeted audience Present over and over and over Lots of time – more interactions with audience Presenter can learn from audience. Oral Presentations Generally more formal – more prestigious?

660 views • 6 slides

Oral Presentation. Ch 26 . Purpose. To present our ideas effectively and visually To inform To persuade To explain. How to present yourself. Body language Vocal tone Eye contact Humor Receptiveness. How to be a good speaker. Speaker. Visuals. Make eye contact Move around

398 views • 9 slides

Oral PRESENTATION

Oral PRESENTATION. B0002108 王 格. Urinary Incontinence. Unit 12 P.151~166. Brainstorming. Did you have any embarrassing behavior in a public occasion ？. What is this article talking about ？. The physiological causes and symptoms of Urinary Incontinence. Main idea:

503 views • 31 slides

Poster Presentation.

131 views • 4 slides

How to make a presentation (Oral and Poster)

How to make a presentation (Oral and Poster). Dr. Bernard Chen Ph.D. University of Central Arkansas July 5 th HIT@UCA Applied Research in Healthy Information . Outline. Presentation Overview Poster Presentation Oral Presentation My presentation in conference .

1.1k views • 55 slides

Oral presentation.

Oral presentation. Who, what?. You will do an oral presentation by pair or alone . You will talk at least 10 minutes . It will deal with a question concerning a company. What?. Examples: How did Apple become the most expensive company?

483 views • 19 slides

Oral presentation. By JP Msibi Executive Director National Association for Youth Empowerment in Construction (NAYEC) VOTE 6 Budget Portfolio Committee for Public Works Parliament (Cape-Town). Contents. About NAYEC Our Vision Our Service Description for Youth Public Works (VOTE 06)

287 views • 12 slides

Oral, Poster contribution

Location. Oral, Poster contribution

220 views • 6 slides

Poster Presentation. How- to’s and Why’s By Kathy Powell RN, BSN, MSCHA, NCSN. Inquiring Minds Want to Know. What Have You Been D oing in Your Clinic?. Is X the best treatment or intervention for this?. Why is X done this way?. WHY?. Is doing X as effective as doing Y?.

412 views • 30 slides

ORAL PRESENTATION

ORAL PRESENTATION. Oral presentation is the art of delivering a speech or a presentation on a one to one basis or before a group of people. A good presentation can have great impact on the audience as it will help the audience understand and remember the subject.

1.31k views • 19 slides

Oral Presentation. Why ?. To practise speaking English for 3-4 minutes Genom undervisningen i ämnet engelska ska eleverna ges förutsättningar att utveckla sin förmåga att: formulera sig och kommunicera i tal använda språkliga strategier göra sig förstådda,

248 views • 6 slides

Clear Interesting. Oral presentation. Lab meeting. Journal club. Qual. Thesis. Presentation at meeting. Choice of a paper. Goal: 1. On topic 2. Important and interesting to a large audience. Localization AND ( Cell [ta] OR Science [ta] OR Nature [ta]). Nature Methods.

179 views • 13 slides

Oral and Poster Communication

Oral and Poster Communication. Robert Bortolussi MD FRCPC Professor of Pediatrics, Dalhousie University. Objectives. Answer question, why do we want to communicate? Describe how to prepare a great oral or poster presentation. Learn to convince people that your discovery is: Unique

448 views • 24 slides

Poster &amp; Oral Presentation

Poster &amp; Oral Presentation. Shahrzad Bazargan-Hejazi Jan 2015. Posters &amp; Presentations. Research results are often publicly shared for the first time during an oral presentation or poster session at an academic or professional conference.

188 views • 16 slides

Poster Presentation. Scientific Communication. Journal articles Conferences Talks (short and long) Posters. Context of Posters. Convey information Concise Presenter is available to answer questions. Types of Posters. Experimental research Information and review. What is a Poster?.

279 views • 26 slides

ORAL PRESENTATION. SALES! 50%! SALES! 70%! SALES!! 120%!. 2. I HATE PUBLIC SPEAKING!. 3. WHAT IS AN ORAL PRESENTATION?. A type of communication that involves speaking &amp; listening Can be formal/ informal Essential for professionals A requirement for students. 4.

501 views • 41 slides

DiamiR Announces Oral Presentation on Recent Advances of Its microRNA Biomarker Platform at 2024 International Rett Syndrome Foundation Scientific Meeting

News provided by

Jun 12, 2024, 08:02 ET

Share this article

NEW HAVEN, Conn. and MONMOUTH JUNCTION, N.J. , June 12, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- DiamiR Biosciences, a developer of innovative non-invasive blood-based diagnostic tests for brain health and other diseases, today announced that the company's co-founder Dr. Kira Sheinerman will present at the 2024 International Rett Syndrome Foundation (IRSF) Rett Syndrome Scientific Meeting, taking place June 18-19, 2024, in Westminster, CO.

Talk Title:  Circulating brain-enriched microRNAs as biomarkers of Rett syndrome Session Title: Biomarkers & Behavior Studies Session Date and Time:   Tuesday, June 19, 2024 at 2:30 pm MDT Location:  The Westin Westminster, Westminster Ballroom

About the International Rett Syndrome Foundation Scientific Meeting

Part of ASCEND 2024 Rett Syndrome National Summit, the IRSF Rett Syndrome Scientific Meeting brings together scientists and researchers studying Rett syndrome and related areas from around the world. During this 2-day meeting, attendees representing academia, industry, and governmental agencies will share their latest research advances and discuss ways to leverage learning in the lab to be rapidly deployed in the clinic.

About DiamiR Biosciences

DiamiR is a privately held molecular diagnostics company focused on developing minimally invasive tests for detection and monitoring of pathology based on quantitative analysis of organ-enriched microRNA signatures in plasma for screening, patient stratification, as well as disease progression and treatment monitoring. DiamiR collaborates with leading academic centers, disease foundations, and biopharma companies. For more information, please visit the company's website at www.diamirbio.com .

This news release contains forward-looking statements regarding future events. These statements are predictions and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause the actual events or results to differ materially.

Contact:  Alidad Mireskandari, Ph.D. 203-570-8275 [email protected]   

SOURCE DiamiR

Modal title

Also from this source.

DiamiR Biosciences Announces Poster Presentation at 52nd Annual Meeting of Child Neurology Society

DiamiR, a developer of innovative blood-based diagnostic tests for brain health and other diseases, today announced that it will present a poster at...

DiamiR Biosciences Partners with JADBio to Utilize Machine Learning in Assay Development

DiamiR Biosciences, a developer of innovative non-invasive blood-based diagnostic tests for brain health and other diseases, today announced that it...

Health Care & Hospitals

Medical Pharmaceuticals

Surveys, Polls and Research

Stack Exchange Network

Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow , the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.

Q&A for work

Connect and share knowledge within a single location that is structured and easy to search.

What is the difference between paper presentation and poster presentation (in terms of prestige)?

I am talking in terms of values. Is there any difference between these two when it comes to the weight they add to a CV? Is a paper presentation better than a poster presentation?

• paper-submission
• liberal-arts

• Based on your other question, I've tagged your question as liberal-arts (we don't seem to have a "literature-as-a-field" tag. Ac.SE is mostly STEM-y people and you'll probably want the tag to get your question answered appropriately. –  Azor Ahai -him- Mar 6, 2023 at 0:01

3 Answers 3

I'm distant from your area... but, in math, in the U.S., a "poster presentation" is sort of a nice thing for undergrads or beginning grad students to do, but rarely is of any consequence.

Presentations, either of papers or free-standing, are much more substantive, to begin with... and are much higher status, CV-padding-wise, as well. You'll have an actual audience, to begin with!!!

• Or "how to go to a conference on a grant" ... –  Azor Ahai -him- Mar 6, 2023 at 0:02

This probably depends on the field, but in CS, at least, a paper presentation is much more valued than a poster. Moreover, conferences are thought of as more valuable than journal publications due to the sorter time scale between submission and the conference vs submission and final publication.

A paper presentation almost certainly gets more review than a poster, even with short time scales. Posters may be most valuable to students looking to get a start on making their, not quite ready, work visible and getting some feedback from conference attendees.

Moreover, it may be (or not) that the papers are published in the proceedings or an associated journal that doesn't include posters.

For some purposes one can do both, actually, even at the same conferences. The paper is expected to be more refined and complete, however.

You asked another question concerning literature. That field might be quite different. If you are a student then a professor in your field can probably give a tailored answer.

• 1 Thank you so much for your valuable comment. It certainly clarified my confusion. If the conference is on English literature, I guess the paper presentation still is more valuable than poster presentation right? –  user164929 Mar 4, 2023 at 21:35
• 2 And, the more experience giving talks, the better your public speaking gets. –  Jon Custer Mar 4, 2023 at 22:15
• 3 For completeness, in the context of CS, a poster presentation as described in the answer should not confused with a poster presentation of an accepted paper at a conference: for many large conferences, most accepted papers are presented via poster sessions instead of talks. –  GoodDeeds Mar 5, 2023 at 9:24

I think that a lot of the effect of poster and paper presentations, in terms of their later (general) reputational value, depends on two main things.

• The number of people of importance and influence who would come to your paper presentation versus a poster viewing.
• The way in which posters versus papers are reported in any subsequent summary of proceedings .

Some post-conference publications include author-edited versions of the papers that were presented; when that happens, the posters are often not mentioned at all. The consequence is that when you cite your paper , people can read what it was about; but when it comes to citing your poster, the best that you can rely on is a line in the pre-conference agenda!

However, if there is no post-conference publication of papers, then it seems to me that there is little potential difference between a paper and a poster. You are really relying a lot on the conference attendees themselves to be the diseminators of your ideas (see point 1).

The Computer Science field is very good at publishing conference papers. I have no idea about the English Literature area.

In terms of CV weighting, my experience in the area of experimental psychology is that posters and conference papers tend to be treated much the same ... low!

You must log in to answer this question.

Hot network questions.

• Preventing Javascript in a browser from connecting to servers
• Can someone explain the damage distrubution on this aircraft that flew through a hailstorm?
• Are there statements so self-evident that writing a proof for them is meaningless? Is this an example of one?
• Saint Augustine letter to Nebridio
• Does it make sense for giants to use clubs or swords when fighting non-giants?
• Is there a phrase like "etymologically related" but for food?
• Poorly-acted 90s–2000s low-budget sci-fi movie with ill-fated desert miners and a man-eating monster
• Why is finding a mathematical basis for the fine-structure constant meaningful?
• Are USB-C through hole shell stakes connected to GND or are they just there for fastening purposes only?
• How to negotiate such toxic competitiveness during my master’s studies?
• What is the maximum number of fish possible in your tank?
• Meaning of にしておく here
• Some congruence problem
• Do reflective warning triangles blow away in wind storms?
• Is a Poisson minus a constant still a Poisson?
• Plagiarism in paragraph and image, or not?
• Reproducing Ómar Rayo's "Fresh Fog" Painting
• Difference between conflicted and ambivalent?
• Password protect directory listing only and not the files themselves
• Has “loginctl enable-linger user” made the UNIX classic “nohup” superfluous? Or have I misunderstood something?
• How could the switch from steam to diesel locomotives be delayed 20-30 years?
• Age of a dark energy dominated universe
• Is this deck post getting cracks due to it being overloaded?
• Non-universal and non classically simulatable gate set?

• Members Login

Advancing earthquake science worldwide

Seismological Society of America > News > Annual Meeting > 2024 Annual Meeting Student Presentation Awards Announced

2024 Annual Meeting Student Presentation Awards Announced

Honoring Student Excellence in Anchorage

In an ongoing effort to support and promote the outstanding work of SSA student members, the Society is pleased to present 19 students with a 2024 Student Presentation Award.

The SSA awards program seeks to highlight excellent student presentations (poster or oral) at the SSA Annual Meeting. Each of the recipients listed below were nominated by attendees at the 2024 Annual Meeting in Anchorage, Alaska (29 April-3 May). A three-person judging panel selected them based upon an absolute standard of excellence and criteria developed by the Student Presentation Subcommittee of the Honors Committee.

Additionally, each recipient was required to be registered as a student and be a student member of SSA in good standing.

2024 Recipients

Derrick Chambers Colorado School of Mines “Dascore: A Python Library for Distributed Acoustic Sensing”

Nicolas DeSalvio University of California, San Diego “Is Dynamically Triggered Seismicity Comparable to Background Seismicity?”

Member Benefits