corporal punishment essay thesis

Essay Samples
College Essay
Writing Tools
Writing guide

Creative samples from the experts

↑ Return to Essay Samples

Argumentative Essay: Should Corporal Punishment Have a Place in Education?

Corporal punishment is the act of using physical force to punish a student for wrongdoing. It might involve a ruler across the back of the hand or a cane to the rear. Corporal punishment has since been outlawed as a cruel and unusual punishment. In this essay, I explore the for and against of implementing corporal punishment within education.

One reason to bring back corporal punishment is to give power back to teachers again. Teaching staff often struggle to chastise students because current punishments have no intimidation power. If they have no power to intimidate students, there’s nothing to fear and no deterrent. A lack of corporal punishment leaves teachers powerless to prevent bad behavior.

On the other hand, corporal punishment often causes injuries and trauma unnecessarily. Many acts of corporal punishment leave visible marks and bruises. The mental anguish, particularly for vulnerable students, can last a lifetime. This doesn’t have the effect of dealing with bad behavior. It can lead directly to lifelong mental problems.

There are also studies showing corporal punishment has no effect on bad behavior. They demonstrate the behavior altering effects is actually trauma coming to the surface. This can cause chronic low confidence and low self-esteem.

Corporal punishment is a viable alternative to suspension. Children often don’t enjoy school. A suspension from school can send out the message it’s a reward rather than a punishment. Using corporal punishment keeps students in school and punishes them, therefore making it clear it isn’t a reward.

There’s always the risk of it leading to abuse in the classroom, however. Teachers do differ in how hard they hit a student. There’s a difference between a 100-pound female teacher and a 250-pound male teacher delivering corporal punishment. This leads to an uneven system whereby the severity of the punishment largely revolves around luck. It’s unfair on students and only makes abuse by teachers more likely.

When a student is punished severely, parents often have to leave work to collect them and take them home again. It disrupts the school schedule and the parent’s schedule. Constant call-outs could lead to a parent losing their job for being unreliable. It can cause a great deal of damage to a family. Corporal punishment stops this from happening because it places the trust in the hands of the teachers.

Putting trust in teachers isn’t something everyone is willing to do, however. Sexual abuse is a major topic in schools and parents are rightly worried about the chances of this abuse manifesting itself. Abuse comes in many different forms. A male teacher could touch a female student on the breast and claim he was meant to touch her on the shoulder. All corporal punishment does is increase the likelihood of sexual abuse occurring.

These are the main arguments for and against corporal punishment. They discuss the practical aspects and the potential flaws of the system. I believe corporal punishment is a flawed system and there are superior alternatives to discipline, such as expulsion and community service. They offer up a punishment without the abuse.

Follow Us on Social Media

Get more free essays

Send via email

Most useful resources for students:.

Free Essays Download
Writing Tools List
Proofreading Services
Universities Rating

Contributors Bio

Find more useful services for students

Free plagiarism check, professional editing, online tutoring, free grammar check.

Undergraduate
High School
Architecture
American History
Asian History
Antique Literature
American Literature
Asian Literature
Classic English Literature
World Literature
Creative Writing
Linguistics
Criminal Justice
Legal Issues
Anthropology
Archaeology
Political Science
World Affairs
African-American Studies
East European Studies
Latin-American Studies
Native-American Studies
West European Studies
Family and Consumer Science
Social Issues
Women and Gender Studies
Social Work
Natural Sciences
Pharmacology
Earth science
Agriculture
Agricultural Studies
Computer Science
IT Management
Mathematics
Investments
Engineering and Technology
Engineering
Aeronautics
Medicine and Health
Alternative Medicine
Communications and Media
Advertising
Communication Strategies
Public Relations
Educational Theories
Teacher's Career
Chicago/Turabian
Company Analysis
Education Theories
Shakespeare
Canadian Studies
Food Safety
Relation of Global Warming and Extreme Weather Condition
Movie Review
Admission Essay
Annotated Bibliography
Application Essay
Article Critique
Article Review
Article Writing
Book Review
Business Plan
Business Proposal
Capstone Project
Cover Letter
Creative Essay
Dissertation
Dissertation - Abstract
Dissertation - Conclusion
Dissertation - Discussion
Dissertation - Hypothesis
Dissertation - Introduction
Dissertation - Literature
Dissertation - Methodology
Dissertation - Results
GCSE Coursework
Grant Proposal
Marketing Plan
Multiple Choice Quiz
Personal Statement
Power Point Presentation
Power Point Presentation With Speaker Notes
Questionnaire
Reaction Paper

Research Paper

Research Proposal
SWOT analysis
Thesis Paper
Online Quiz

Literature Review

Movie Analysis
Statistics problem
Math Problem
All papers examples
How It Works
Money Back Policy
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
We Are Hiring

Corporal Punishment, Research Paper Example

Pages: 10

Words: 2877

Hire a Writer for Custom Research Paper

Use 10% Off Discount: "custom10" in 1 Click 👇

You are free to use it as an inspiration or a source for your own work.

Corporal Punishment – Acceptable or Abuse?

Although the term appears to be outdated in some respects, the concept of corporal punishment continues to exist in modern society in some cultures as a means of conducting disciplinary action upon those that do not adhere to the rules. Although this is considered by some to be an acceptable form of punishment, many others argue that this level of discipline is far too harsh and consequential for those being punished. Therefore, a balance must be identified that will distinguish between the needs of different types of situations that might warrant corporal punishment activities, and when these actions might be considered abusive to those that receive them. Therefore, the primary research questions to consider are as follows: 1) Under which circumstances is corporal punishment an acceptable form of behavior? 2) When is corporal punishment considered to be an act of abuse? These questions and other factors associated with corporal punishment will be addressed in the following paragraphs, and will consider the challenges that are relevant in order to demonstrate the basic principles of this process, and when it is permitted versus when it is an unacceptable practice.

Main Purpose

The primary purpose of the study is to address the overall context of corporal punishment and how it is used in today’s society, when it is used permissibly, as well as when it is used excessively. This will demonstrate that there are significant options to exercise disciplinary action against children, and that corporal punishment is only one of several choices that might be feasible for consideration. It is necessary to evaluate existing literature regarding this topic, and how this reflects a key understanding of the principles that are most relevant in supporting long-term outcomes for children that face routine disciplinary action. This information is relevant in order to determine if there are any long-term patterns that are associated with children that have experienced corporal punishment on a regular basis, in contrast to those children that were never punished in this manner. For children that have experienced these circumstances more regularly, there is likely to be a number of important challenges that they face during childhood and beyond with respect to behavioral responses, and these must be addressed properly in order to improve long-term outcomes. This research is interesting because it offers a greater understanding of the issues that are often prevalent in this population, and how they reflect the manner in which children behave in today’s society, and how much of this behavior is influenced by disciplinary actions that are taken against them. This project is motivating because it may address some personal questions regarding why children behave in specific ways, and how these behaviors have created different problems and concerns for them with respect to their educational, social, and familial circumstances. It is necessary to develop an effective understanding of these principles, and to apply them to a variety of situations so that corporal punishment might be addressed in the desired manner without further consequence to those that receive this type of discipline.

Units of Analysis

In order to evaluate corporal punishment effectively, it is necessary to address the challenges that are involved in determining how frequently corporal punishment is used, and which groups of the modern population employ this practice on either an infrequent or regular basis. These objectives will ultimately determine if there is sufficient evidence to support the objectives of the discussion. The most effective strategy to consider corporal punishment is to examine different cross sections of the United States population that might be inclined to use corporal punishment in one way or another, and to establish an effective understanding of these population segments to determine the extent of corporal punishment use. It is suspected that different population groups use corporal punishment in different ways, depending upon their cultures, existing practices, income levels, educational quality, and other related considerations, and that these criteria are very useful in determining the widespread reach of this practice across different populations. In general, the most effective means to examine corporal punishment involves the evaluation of social groups and policies that are often based upon existing cultural practices, as well as educational standards, each of which influences the use of corporal punishment in different ways. This requires an effective understanding of the concerns and issues that impact today’s populations, and how children are also impacted by family values and principles, both positive and negative, and how they might mature as a result of these concerns, and even act out in negative ways during adolescence and adulthood.

Points of Focus and Time Dimension

In this discussion, the primary points of exploration involve a key understanding of the intent that surrounds corporal punishment, and why it is selected as a behavioral mechanism rather than other choices. Therefore, the behaviors that lead to corporal punishment activities must serve as the key facilitators in promoting these actions amongst different population groups. Therefore, the intent behind these actions, and the behaviors that lead to them are the key indicators of the study and its purpose. In addition, the study is best suited for a cross-sectional evaluation, because this will provide elements of data from different sectors that will be useful in determining how corporal punishment is used across different population groups and sectors.

Ethical and Political Implications

Due to the sensitive nature of the study and the examination of statistics that are associated with young children, there are ethical challenges that are associated with the study that require further consideration, so that any data or information regarding this age group is protected from unnecessary risk or harm. This will also ensure that there are significant opportunities to explore issues involving human subjects, which may include but are not limited to informed consent, participation, confidentiality, and legal issues. Therefore, in order to protect the subjects that are being considered for inclusion in the study, there must be an approach in place that is designed to protect subjects from being specifically identified. Each subject that is considered for the study will be provided with an informed consent form, and will not be forced to participate in the study under any circumstances. Their participation is entirely voluntary, and no consequences will be made if participation is declined for any reason. In addition, all subjects will be identified using a random number assignment that is not associated in any way with a specific subject so that they would be identifiable. Since the primary purpose of the study is to collect data regarding participants, there is very minimal risk involved in study participation. It is also important to note that the study reflects an opportunity to explore data involved in corporal punishment in an honest and forthright manner. Therefore, any data that is collected will be used truthfully. Due to the sensitivity of the subject matter and the subject population, it is also believed that there are considerable risks that may lead to legal concerns, so in order to limit these risks, the study will be examined in such a way that it reflects these legal concerns up front with the consent form and participation process. It is also anticipated that the study will minimize any possible conflicts of interest within the process by exploring these issues at the very beginning, and will exclude any potential participant that does not fall under the strict criteria that are established by the study leaders. From an ethical perspective, it is expected that there will also be some concerns, but that these will be limited and will be addressed in the consent form. Finally, the study data will not be used beyond the scope of this individual research project, so there is no risk of data tampering or utilization by other studies without the express written permission of the study leaders. This will ensure anonymity and confidentiality as best as possible throughout the study process.

A wide body of literature sources are available that consider the challenges involved in corporal punishment for children from a behavioral perspective. There are many diverse opinions regarding corporal punishment, and are derived from many different schools of thought, as noted in the following: “The practice of hitting and ideas supporting such disciplinary technique are deeply embedded in the religious beliefs of selected groups within the United States and other Western societies—especially among conservative Evangelical Christians” (Ripoll-Nunez and Rohner, 2006, p. 222). In this context, it is necessary to consider the role that different cultural and religious beliefs play in individual opinions regarding corporal punishment, and how these circumstances also relate to other perspectives (Ripoll-Nunez and Rohner, 2006). In this context, it is essential to develop a key understanding of the role that these perspectives play in the behaviors that are exhibited by different cultural and population groups.

Other opinions have evolved regarding corporal punishment that include the following: “Proponents of appropriately used non-abusive CP believe some discipline needs to be ‘more serious’ than others in order to make the desired lesson memorable for the child. However, debate continues over whether a caregiver is able to maintain control of the physical punishment so it does not escalate into abuse” (Litzow and Silverstein, 2008, p. 542). In this context, it becomes very important to address the role that these circumstances play in how corporal punishment is viewed by different cultures and groups, and how these circumstances are conducive to the use of corporal punishment in specific situations (Litzow and Silverstein, 2008). It is also necessary to consider that corporal punishment may lead some children to face difficult periods of behavioral problems and subsequent adjustment, which may reflect a difficult time for these children over the long term (Aucoin et.al, 2006). Since this form of discipline is viewed in a very negative light in some cultures, it becomes necessary to evaluate how it influences the ability of children that have been punished in this manner to effectively adjust to normal routines and circumstances without severe consequences (Aucoin et.al, 2006). However, research demonstrates that it has been very difficult in many cases to associate the two concepts in an effective manner (Aucoin et.al, 2006). Therefore, further research into this area is required in order to link the two concepts together more appropriately. To coincide with this assessment, “several researchers have argued that parental use of corporal punishment is associated with increases in children’s behavior problems” (Grogan-Kaylor, 2005, p. 293). In this manner, it is observed that there are significant problems that are likely to occur with some children who face repeated disciplinary action in the form of corporal punishment, and that these issues must be addressed as early as possible in order to consider underlying behavioral concerns successfully (Grogan-Kaylor, 2005). However, it is well known that “The precise longitudinal nature of the relationship between parental use of corporal punishment and children’s behavior problems remains poorly understood” (Grogan-Kaylor, 2005, p. 284). Therefore, the proposed research study serves as an opportunity to explore these choices, and to draw conclusions regarding different behaviors and how they ultimately influence long-term outcomes for children facing this type of discipline over a period of time.

In many cases, “CP is correlated with more severe physical violence, psychological abuse, and other familial and contextual risks…recent research suggests that frequent spanking is also associated with children’s hormonal reactivity to stress” (Gagne et.al, 2007, pp. 1286-1287). It is very important to address these circumstances in the context of this research proposal, because these outcomes are likely to influence the behaviors that some adults will assume in regards to corporal punishment, and how this reflects a means of facilitating change for those persons that might have considered corporal punishment as a feasible option (Gagne et.al, 2007). With these considerations in mind, it is important to address these findings in such a way that behavioral concepts are evaluated in greater detail, so that there are no questions regarding the level at which corporal punishment is used throughout different cultural and population groups. In general, over the long term, “Spanking and other forms of CP are related to increased aggressive and delinquent behavior in children, poorer parent/child relationships, worse child mental health, increased physical abuse of children, increased adult aggression and criminal behavior, decreased adult mental health, and increased risk of abusing one’s own spouse or child as an adult” (Knox, 2010, p. 104). In this context, it is important to note that due to the negative nature of these behaviors, adults should likely reconsider the type of punishment that they bring upon children under different circumstances, because corporal punishment is not always the most feasible choice (Knox, 2010).

Conceptualization, Operationalization, and Measurement

The key concepts to consider in this study are as follows: 1) Behavioral measures that lead adults to enact corporal punishment upon children; and 2) Behavioral outcomes in children that face corporal punishment. These concepts will be utilized in such a way that they reflect opportunities to explore different underlying factors that lead to subsequent behaviors regarding corporal punishment. Each concept will be measured by using a survey instrument that will capture data regarding corporal punishment behaviors, and how these may lead to negative outcomes in some children. However, the primary focus will concentrate on adult behavioral measures that lead to corporal punishment actions upon children. The measurements will be based upon survey responses, so the outcomes will be evaluated accordingly. The variables will cover the behavioral aspects and intent behind corporal punishment for children for those that have used this form of discipline before.

Data Collection Plans

Data collection will take place in the form a survey instrument, which will reflect a key understanding of the challenges and considerations involving the adult behavioral aspects of corporal punishment. The design will be self-administered, and will be conducted in an effort to obtain the data that is necessary in order to understand why corporal punishment is conducted in some situations. This design is most useful for the research study because it offers the greatest opportunity to explore data from diverse points of view, and will provide the best cross-section of study participants selected for inclusion.

The sampling design will be random, and will explore several different communities and their populations and cultures in order to obtain an effective cross-sectional analysis. This is important in order to convey the challenges that are involved in determining when and why corporal punishment is used by adults to discipline children, as opposed to other options. Researcher bias is not likely to be a problem, because the researcher does not have regular contact with children and is not vested in the concept other than from an independent research perspective. If time and resources were unlimited, it would be possible to explore many other options beyond the adult behavioral aspect of corporal punishment, such as child behaviors and related outcomes.

In evaluating the results, it was determined that there are a number of key factors involved in the decision to use corporal punishment, but most importantly, personal experience with this form of discipline as a child, as well as community and cultural norms are the primary reasons behind the choice to use corporal punishment in a disciplinary manner. These conclusions are important in determining the manner in which to proceed with long-term outcomes and approaches to corporal punishment and why it is used in today’s society.

Retrospective Analysis

In evaluating the study and the research design, it is important to consider the strengths and weaknesses of the design, as well as other attributes that contributed to the process. The strongest component of the research design was the objectives of the study, since these addressed a relatively weak research area, and sought to explore additional measures that could better explain the reasons behind the choices to enact corporal punishment upon children. Since the findings are representative of a number of important trends in the adult population in regards to corporal punishment, they serve as useful indicators in order to determine how adults view corporal punishment, which is based upon their cultural and familial views, as well as personal perspectives regarding child discipline and how it should be carried out. These findings are only a small percentage of the many possible alternatives that exist, but they are nonetheless valid and reliable within the context of the study. Finally, if the time and resources were unlimited, the study would have explored additional factors that are important in order expand upon the behavioral aspects of adult choices in regards to corporal punishment. In addition, the survey instrument would have been more detailed and would have delved further into the aspects of the adult personality that might be conducive to choosing corporal punishment as a form of discipline.

Works Cited

Aucoin, K.J., Frick, P.J., and Bodin, S.D. (2006). Corporal punishment and child adjustment. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 27: 527-541.

Gagne, M.H., Tourigny, M., Joly, J., and Pouloit-Lapointe, J. (2007). Predictors of adult attitudes toward corporal punishment of children. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 22(10): 1285-1304.

Grogan-Kaylor, A. (2005). Corporal punishment and the growth trajectory of children’s antisocial behavior. Child Maltreatment, 10(3): 283-292.

Knox, M. (2010). On hitting children: a review of corporal punishment in the United States. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 24(2): 103-107.

Litzow, J.M. (2008). Corporal punishment: a discussion of the debate. Paediatrics and Child Health, 18(12): 542-544.

Ripoll-Nunez, K.J., and Rohner, R.P. (2006). Corporal punishment in cross-cultural perspective: directions for a research agenda. Cross-Cultural Research, 40(3): 220-249.

Stuck with your Research Paper?

Get in touch with one of our experts for instant help!

Individualized Education, Research Paper Example

Types of Assessment Tests, Essay Example

Time is precious

don’t waste it!

Plagiarism-free guarantee

Privacy guarantee

Secure checkout

Money back guarantee

Related Research Paper Samples & Examples

The risk of teenagers smoking, research paper example.

Pages: 11

Words: 3102

Impacts on Patients and Healthcare Workers in Canada, Research Paper Example

Pages: 7

Words: 1839

Death by Neurological Criteria, Research Paper Example

Words: 2028

Ethical Considerations in End-Of-Life Care, Research Paper Example

Pages: 5

Words: 1391

Ethical Dilemmas in Brain Death, Research Paper Example

Words: 2005

Politics of Difference and the Case of School Uniforms, Research Paper Example

Pages: 2

Words: 631

The Controversy Surrounding Corporal Punishment: a Critical Analysis of its Efficacy

This essay about the efficacy of corporal punishment engages in a meticulous examination of its impact, immersing itself in the ongoing discourse surrounding child discipline. Advocates argue for its indispensable role in swiftly deterring undesirable behavior, but mounting skepticism arises as research challenges assumed effectiveness and raises concerns about potential harm. The essay unravels the intricate narrative, delving into the psychological repercussions and long-term effects on children. Cultural nuances further complicate the debate, with diverse attitudes shaping perspectives on corporal punishment. Critics argue that its use perpetuates a cycle of violence, normalizing physical aggression as a conflict resolution method. The essay concludes by advocating for a paradigm shift towards alternative disciplinary approaches that prioritize positive reinforcement, open communication, and emotional intelligence for the holistic growth of the younger generation in evolving societies.

How it works

In the ever-evolving dialogue surrounding child discipline, the persistent controversy regarding corporal punishment takes center stage, beckoning a thorough and nuanced exploration. This essay embarks on a meticulous critical analysis of the efficacy of corporal punishment, immersing itself in the ongoing discourse that continues to enthrall educational and parenting spheres. As societal perspectives on discipline undergo continual transformation, a detailed examination of the impact and consequences of corporal punishment emerges as not only pertinent but imperative.

Corporal punishment, characterized by the deliberate use of physical force to induce pain without causing injury, weaves through the historical fabric of disciplinary practices.

Advocates uphold it as an indispensable means of swiftly deterring undesirable behavior. However, this stance encounters mounting skepticism as an expanding body of research challenges assumed effectiveness and raises apprehensions about potential harm associated with such punitive measures.

At the core of the controversy lies a fundamental query: does corporal punishment genuinely prove effective in instilling discipline? While proponents assert its prompt curbing of misbehavior, a critical analysis unravels a more intricate narrative. Studies suggest that while corporal punishment may yield immediate compliance, it often falls short of addressing the root causes of misbehavior. The use of fear as a motivator may hinder a child’s moral reasoning and understanding of consequences, potentially leading to recurring behavioral issues.

Beyond the immediate concerns, the psychological repercussions of corporal punishment emerge as a profound area of concern. A consistent body of research points to a correlation between physical discipline and adverse emotional outcomes for children. The fear and anxiety induced by corporal punishment not only corrode the child’s trust in authority figures but may also contribute to the development of aggressive tendencies, prompting profound questions about the enduring effects on mental health and overall well-being.

Navigating the debate becomes more intricate when considering diverse cultural and societal influences. Attitudes and practices related to corporal punishment exhibit wide-ranging variations across different regions and communities. While some perceive it as a traditional and effective form of discipline, others challenge its ethical underpinnings and question its role in fostering a positive parent-child or teacher-student relationship. Recognizing these cultural nuances is imperative in comprehending the myriad perspectives that shape the multifaceted controversy surrounding corporal punishment.

Critics argue that utilizing physical force as a disciplinary tool perpetuates a worrisome cycle of violence. Children exposed to corporal punishment may internalize the belief that physical aggression is an acceptable means of conflict resolution. This learned behavior can subsequently manifest in their own interactions, contributing to a broader societal normalization of violence as a method of control.

A comprehensive critical analysis of corporal punishment mandates an exploration of alternative disciplinary approaches. The paradigm shift towards positive reinforcement, open communication, and the cultivation of emotional intelligence emerges as a compelling alternative. Strategies such as time-outs, loss of privileges, and dialogue-based interventions are posited as more effective means of addressing behavioral issues while concurrently nurturing a psychologically and emotionally healthier environment.

In conclusion, the enduring controversy surrounding corporal punishment necessitates an incisive examination of its efficacy as a disciplinary method. The argument for immediate compliance and deterrence must be scrutinized against the potential enduring consequences on a child’s psychological well-being and moral development. As societies undergo transformation, the imperative lies in fostering open, inclusive discussions, embracing cultural diversity, and exploring alternative approaches that prioritize positive reinforcement, thereby ensuring the holistic growth of the younger generation.

Cite this page

The Controversy Surrounding Corporal Punishment: A Critical Analysis of Its Efficacy. (2024, Mar 12). Retrieved from https://papersowl.com/examples/the-controversy-surrounding-corporal-punishment-a-critical-analysis-of-its-efficacy/

"The Controversy Surrounding Corporal Punishment: A Critical Analysis of Its Efficacy." PapersOwl.com , 12 Mar 2024, https://papersowl.com/examples/the-controversy-surrounding-corporal-punishment-a-critical-analysis-of-its-efficacy/

PapersOwl.com. (2024). The Controversy Surrounding Corporal Punishment: A Critical Analysis of Its Efficacy . [Online]. Available at: https://papersowl.com/examples/the-controversy-surrounding-corporal-punishment-a-critical-analysis-of-its-efficacy/ [Accessed: 13 Jun. 2024]

"The Controversy Surrounding Corporal Punishment: A Critical Analysis of Its Efficacy." PapersOwl.com, Mar 12, 2024. Accessed June 13, 2024. https://papersowl.com/examples/the-controversy-surrounding-corporal-punishment-a-critical-analysis-of-its-efficacy/

"The Controversy Surrounding Corporal Punishment: A Critical Analysis of Its Efficacy," PapersOwl.com , 12-Mar-2024. [Online]. Available: https://papersowl.com/examples/the-controversy-surrounding-corporal-punishment-a-critical-analysis-of-its-efficacy/. [Accessed: 13-Jun-2024]

Don't let plagiarism ruin your grade

Hire a writer to get a unique paper crafted to your needs.

Our writers will help you fix any mistakes and get an A+!

Please check your inbox.

You can order an original essay written according to your instructions.

Trusted by over 1 million students worldwide

1. Tell Us Your Requirements

2. Pick your perfect writer

3. Get Your Paper and Pay

Hi! I'm Amy, your personal assistant!

Don't know where to start? Give me your paper requirements and I connect you to an academic expert.

short deadlines

100% Plagiarism-Free

Certified writers

Essay Service Examples Social Issues Horrific Punishments

Corporal Punishment Essay

11 samples in this category

Throughout history, it has been standard practice to discipline kids at home and school using corporal punishment, defined as the application of physical force to inflict pain for disciplinary purposes. While detractors contend it harms people physically and psychologically. Supporters argue that it instills discipline. This essay explores the adverse...

Historical context

Historically, corporal punishment has been deeply entrenched in many cultures worldwide. From ancient civilizations like the Romans and Greeks to more recent colonial societies, physical punishment was seen not only as an acceptable form of discipline but often as the most effective one. In educational settings, instruments like the cane, paddle, or ruler were standard tools used to administer punishment for misbehavior or academic underperformance.

However, our understanding of human rights and child psychology evolved as societies evolved. Many nations began outlawing corporal punishment in schools and homes, recognizing it inhumane and ineffective.

Today, the tide has turned significantly against the practice. Numerous countries have outlawed corporal punishment in all settings, including the home. Institutions that once upheld these practices now advocate for alternative disciplinary methods. Yet, corporal punishment persists in some regions, often justified by cultural, religious, or traditional beliefs.

Psychological implications

It’s vital to understand that while corporal punishment might yield immediate compliance, it doesn’t equate to genuine understanding or long-term behavioral change. A child or person may abstain from behavior out of fear of bodily injury rather than genuinely knowing why it is wrong.

Numerous studies have connected physical punishment to a variety of psychiatric problems. Physically restrained children are likelier to act violently, interact poorly with their parents, and experience mental health issues like sadness, anxiety, and low self-esteem. Furthermore, children are more likely to continue the cycle of violence as adults by resorting to physical force to settle disputes.

The ethical conundrum

Are we entitled to cause suffering to another person, especially someone defenseless, to teach them a lesson? Its crucial ethical dilemma is brought up by corporal punishment. This subject becomes even more critical since several other disciplinary strategies don’t rely on physical force.

One of the primary arguments for corporal punishment is that it results in immediate compliance. When a child behaves unpleasantly, a swift physical consequence can quickly deter the behavior, offering immediate results. Many proponents argue that their cultural or religious beliefs sanction corporal punishment. They say tradition has a valuable role in shaping behaviors and preserving cultural norms.

Alternatives to corporal punishment

One of the most advocated methods is positive reinforcement. We may encourage youngsters to repeat these acts by rewarding positive behavior. Children are driven by the promise of good outcomes rather than the fear of bad ones in a positive environment fostered by this approach.

Another method is using time-outs or allowing natural consequences to take their course. For example, if a child refuses to wear a coat on a cold day, they might feel cold – a natural outcome of their choice. This method helps children connect their actions and the consequences, promoting personal responsibility.

Lastly, fostering open communication can be an effective disciplinary tool. Talking to a child about their acts, comprehending their intentions, and explaining the consequences might result in greater understanding and growth instead of reacting with rage or violence. Engaging in open dialogue with children about their actions, explaining why they were mistaken, and discussing alternative behaviors can be incredibly effective. It treats children as rational beings capable of understanding and growth.

Although physical punishment has a long history, its applicability in contemporary culture is hotly debated. Given the psychological ramifications and ethical issues involved, there is a strong justification for investigating and implementing alternate discipline techniques. As society develops, we must prioritize our children’s mental and emotional health, raising them with compassion rather than through pain and terror.

Corporal Punishment As A Kind Of Physical Child Abuse

The outcomes of corporal punishment in children, arguments against corporal punishment.

800+ verified writers can handle your paper.

Corporal Punishment In Schools: Apparatus Of Mending Or Oppression

Corporal punishment in india, the evolution of corporal punishment in education.

Corporal Punishment And Child Rights Violation

Corporal punishment in parent-child relationship: for and against, should we provide corporal punishment for bullies, corporal punishment: the solution to violence in south african schools, long-term effects of childhood punishment.

Join our 150k of happy users

Get original paper written according to your instructions
Save time for what matters most

Fair Use Policy

EduBirdie considers academic integrity to be the essential part of the learning process and does not support any violation of the academic standards. Should you have any questions regarding our Fair Use Policy or become aware of any violations, please do not hesitate to contact us via [email protected].

Negative Effects of Children’s Corporal Punishment

To find inspiration for your paper and overcome writer’s block
As a source of information (ensure proper referencing)
As a template for you assignment

The negative physical/psychological effects of corporate punishment on children.

What science says about using physical force to punish a child.

The article discusses the negative effect of using violence to discipline children, especially in their early childhood learning and development. According to the author, early childhood development gains direction from several factors. Genetic factors such as nature, gender, and health conditions, which arise from within the children, play an essential role in children’s growth, development, and relationship with others. Therefore, the author argues that a child exposed to continuous violent disciplinary acts is likely to experience slow or negatively skewed development. When a child is exposed to extreme violent discipline, he or she may be stigmatized. The author is definite that community and social structure influence child development.

The author states that “young victims of violence may start withdrawing and behaving differently as a coping strategy” (Samakow par. 11). Since using violence to discipline children does not allow the young minds to engage the free spirit that promotes creativity, “the learning process at home or in school may be compromised since applying force as a corrective measure may be counterproductive” (Samakow par. 14). When nothing is done to help such a victim, the child may grow into a violent adult with very poor socialization skills. The quotes confirm that the use of violence to discipline children interferes with early childhood learning, which plays an essential role in child development.

Physical Punishment in Childhood: The Rights of the Child. New York: John Wiley & Sons

The book provides a wide range of views; the authors explore the fine line between normalized physical punishment and illegal or unacceptable physical and emotional abuse of children. It builds on the emerging field of research that provides opportunities for children to speak for themselves about their views and experiences. It provides observations from children, professionals, and several generations from within individual families. Also, it discusses the power of language used by parents, professionals, and the media to describe physical punishment.

The author states “The silencing and powerlessness of children who suffer degrading and unjust treatment by adults responsible for their care and protection is a characteristic of childhood often maintained by sanctioned physical punishment” (Saunders and Goddard, 2008, p.415). Prof. Goddard states that “it seems clear that ‘much violence is learned at home, home, therefore, is surely where we should begin to arrest the process” (Goddard, 1994, p. 12).

Corporal Punishment of Children

In his article, Lenta strived to promote the idea that the practice of subjecting children to corporal punishment cannot be considered appropriate. The author’s line of reasoning, in this respect, is concerned with outlining the main pro-punishment arguments and exposing them, as such that is being utterly inconsistent with the realities of modern living. For example, Lenta mentions the fact that the application of corporal punishment often does prove rather effective, as the inexpensive and convenient instrument of correcting children’s behavior.

According to the author, many people also believe that by subjecting their children to corporal punishment, they help the latter to become emotionally comfortable with the notion of discipline – something that should benefit children in the long term. Lenta, however, refutes these claims by pointing out what appear to be the main indications of the concerned practice’s inappropriateness, such as the fact that corporal punishment violates the child’s “right to security of the person” and the “right not to suffer degrading punishment” (699). This positions Lenta’s article, as such that is being strongly opposed to the idea that there is nothing wrong with administering corporal punishment to children.

“Corporal punishment cannot be justified on consequentialist grounds because it involves the infliction of pain that has not conclusively been shown to do significant good, because it poses some risk of serious harm, and because there are alternative punishments that bring about as much (if not more) benefit at a lower cost” (Lenta 690). “The unfair discrimination inherent in the corporal punishment of children is a serious moral wrong. It is a violation of the ideal of respect for the equal dignity of all” (Lenta 705).

Even though the authors of the above-summarized articles (and the book) took different approaches to define the actual effects of corporate punishment on children, they all agree that most of these effects are strongly negative. The following is the synthesis of the actual insights, as to the inappropriateness of subjecting children to corporal punishment, contained in the reviewed sources:

Corporal punishment results in the social alienation of children. While subjected to it, the child will naturally come to assume that there is something utterly wrong about him or her, which in turn will lead this person to begin experiencing the sensation of self-loathing. In its turn, this explains why corporate punishment is being often discussed as the strong contributive factor behind one’s tendency to exhibit mentally abnormal behavior. As Saunders and Goddard noted: “Physical (corporal) punishment may effectively devalue children, foster poor self-esteem and contribute to a fearful and coercive environment” (114). This suggestion is fully justified because, as psychologists are being well aware, children rarely assign any moral significance to the punishment that they receive – for them, it is essentially the matter of a ‘lesser force’ being subdued by a ‘greater force’. Consequently, this results in convincing them that the ways of the world are strongly unjust and that adults cannot be trusted. As the ultimate consequence, the likelihood to end up becoming socially alienated/violently minded individuals, on the part of people with the childhood-experience of having been corporally punished, increases rather substantially. What is even worse, as a result of having been punished physically (verbally), children are likely to develop a rebellious attitude towards adults and to eventually become even less manageable, in the behavioral sense of this word – as the gesture of paying their punishers with the same token of respect. According to Samakow: “Physical punishment encourages kids to continue the cycle of abuse…. children who are hit are more likely to use the action to solve problems with their peers and siblings” (par. 11). Such an eventual scenario is also predetermined by the sheer cuteness of how children perceive the surrounding reality. After all, children have always been known for their ability to learn rather quickly that the most energetically effective way for them to avoid being punished, is to make sure they are not caught doing wrong things – as opposed to ceasing to be affiliated with these things, altogether.
Corporal punishment of children often leads to physical abuse. The very juxtaposition of a child (the punished) against an adult (the punisher), naturally presupposes the heightened possibility for the latter to end up miscalculating the actual strength, with which psychical punishment is being administered – especially if such widely used forms of corporal punishment as spanking and paddling are being concerned. This, in turn, may result in the punished child sustaining physical injuries. According to Saunders and Goddard: “In some cases, the mild ‘smack’ or ‘tap’ on a child’s hand or bottom escalates into severe and sometimes criminal abuse. Even fatal abuse has been linked to physical punishment” (4). What contributes towards increasing the likelihood of such a scenario, is that neither parents nor teachers are qualified in administering physical punishment. In this respect, the realities of post-industrial living in the West need to be considered, as well. After all, these realities presuppose the parents/teachers’ continual exposure to the increasing amounts of (often irrelevant) information, on one hand, and to the requirement to apply ever more effort into ensuring that they retain their ‘place under Sun’, on the other – hence, causing them to experience the sensation of emotional distress on a semi-permanent basis. However, it is a well-known fact that the stressed-out individuals do not only exhibit a tendency to indulge in violence, but also to use excessive force, while on the rampage. Yet, as practice indicates, most parents/teachers decide in favor of resorting to corporal punishment, as the instrument of ‘correcting’ children, when all other options have been exhausted, which means that the actual process of administering this kind of punishment is highly emotional and consequently – prone to abuse.
The application of corporal punishment to children undermines their chances to become socially responsible individuals. Even though that a child of just about any age (with the exemption of toddlers) can be corporally punished, it is namely the children from six to thirteen years old, who appear to be the most vulnerable to the prospect of facing such a punishment. At this age, most children gain a preliminary awareness of the notion of what a civil right stands for. Therefore, when subjected to corporal punishment, they are being naturally prompted to doubt the conceptual validity of the notion in question. This simply could not be otherwise – the very premise that children can be administered corporal punishment presupposes this punishment’s discriminatory essence: “Corporal punishment unfairly discriminates against children. The unfair discrimination inherent in the corporal punishment of children is a serious moral wrong. It is a violation of the ideal of respect for the equal dignity of all” (Lenta 705). Therefore, there is nothing too surprising about the fact that, as many studies indicate, individuals with a history of having been excessively exposed to corporal punishments, tend to exhibit a rather cynical attitude towards the idea that it is specifically the impersonal law, which defines the qualitative dynamics within the society. As a logical result, these individuals often choose to break the law, as the mean of trying to make their lives count. It is understood, of course, that this situation can hardly be considered thoroughly tolerable, which in turn explains why, as time goes on, the idea of banning corporal punishment, as the method of disciplining children, becomes increasingly popular with more and more people.
Corporal punishment is capable of setting children on the path of sexual deviation. As it was mentioned earlier, corporal punishment is primarily about inflicting physical pain upon a child, which is being done in a variety of different ways. The common assumption, in regards to these methods of discipline, is that after having been subjected to them, the child will be naturally prompted to associate physical pain with the wrongdoing – something that should make him or her think twice, before deciding in favor of the latter. However, what is being usually overlooked, in this respect, is that the process of administering this kind of punishment is utterly humiliating. Yet, as psychologists are being aware, those who end up being subjected to humiliation continuously, are likely to develop an unhealthy taste for being treated in such a manner (sadomasochism), and towards inflicting pain upon others. According to Saunders and Goddard: “Cumulative evidence suggests that physical punishment may (at least in part) be responsible for … masochistic sexual relationships” (144). What it means is that, regardless of whether they do it willingly or unwillingly, but by administering corporal punishment to their children, parents do make it more likely for the former to turn psychologically/mentally deviant: “Spanking alters kids’ brains” (Samakow par. 15). There is an even more sinister aspect to this – as practice shows, the main reason for some parents/teachers to decide in favor of subjecting the child to corporal punishment is that they derive sadistic pleasure out of it. It is understood, of course, that under this type of circumstances, the punishing of children ceases to serve even a nominal ‘corrective’ function and becomes the instrument of these children’s victimization. This, however, does not only represent an acute risk to the affected children’s normal development, but also the well-being of the society, as a whole, which is another reason why the practice of corporal punishment is being increasingly criticized.

Overall, all three sources do agree that the range of negative effects of corporate punishment on children is indeed rather wide and that parents/teachers should do their best to avoid taking advantage of this disciplinarian instrument. Even though the authors do deserve to be given a credit for having done a fair amount of research on the given topic, many of the contained contra-punishment claims, on their part, appear to be somewhat biased. The practical value of the reviewed sources would be much higher if the authors focused more on supporting these claims with references to the empirical studies, as to the negative effects of corporal punishment on children.

The positive psychological/physical effects of corporal punishment on children (as seen by some authors)

Social theory and practice.

This particular article is quite unusual, in the sense that it can be discussed as being nothing short of an apologetic account of children’s corporal punishment. The reason for this is that in it, the author aimed to substantiate the idea that, once assessed from the consequentialist and retributivist perspectives, the practice will appear fully justified. As Benatar noted: “Given… that the (negative) effects (of corporal punishment) are not substantial, there is a strong likelihood that they could be overridden by other considerations in a consequentialist calculation” (243).

The author’s approach to arguing in favor of his point of view on the subject matter in question is concerned with the deployment of the rhetorical principle of reductio ad absurdum . For example, according to the author, to claim that applying physical punishment to the child prompts him or her to adopt a tolerant attitude towards violence, would be the same as to claim that keeping convicts incarcerated endorses the idea that the best way to deal with people who displease us, is to throw them into jail. At the same time, however, Benatar does agree with the suggestion that parents/teachers should try their best to avoid subjecting children to corporal punishment.

“Corporal punishment indeed involves the application of direct and intense power to the body, but I do not see how that constitutes a more severe lowering of somebody’s standing than employing indirect and mild power in the course of a strip-search, for example” (Benatar 242). “Punishment in schools can be seen as serving a useful educational purpose. It facilitates the move from the jurisdiction of the family to the jurisdiction of the state, teaching the child that punishment is not always inflicted by close people who love one and no one” (Benatar 239).

Paddling and the Repression of the Feminine in Male Hazing

In his article, Mechling deploys a psychoanalytical approach to discussing the actual significance of administering corporal punishment (spanking/paddling) to children (boys). According to the author, this practice serves the role of encouraging young boys to adopt the patriarchal outlook on how society functions. The reason for this is that spanking/paddling of boys is in essence the sublimation of sexual intercourse. As Mechling noted: “The paddle embodies masculine power and authority… The shape of the paddle itself may suggest the phallus, the ultimate symbol of power in a patriarchal society” (63).

What it means is that, when subjected to this kind of punishment, the boys are being naturally prompted to a) associate the notion of ‘masculinity’ with the notion of ‘authority’, b) repress the unconscious feminine anxieties within themselves, as ‘shameful’. This, in turn, is supposed to familiarize boys with the idea that it is thoroughly natural for them to be concerned with the thoughts of domination, and consequently to increase their chances to attain a social prominence, by the time they reach adulthood. Even though Mechling’s article does not directly relate to the paper’s actual subject matter, it nevertheless contains several in-depth insights, into what creates the objective preconditions for corporal punishment to continue being administered to children.

“The male buttocks signify both strength and vulnerability. It displays the male musculature, but it is also the site where a man can be feminized” (64). “We note that the origins of paddling (as the form of corporal punishment) in the late nineteenth century… coincides with a growing “crisis in masculinity” experienced in both England and the United States” (71).

Even though the practice of subjecting children to corporal punishment is now being ostracized, some authors nevertheless believe that there at least a few benefits to it, as well. The mentioned two articles exemplify the validity of this suggestion because as a result of having been introduced to them, one will come to realize that there is indeed a good reason for the concerned practice to remain controversial, rather than to be banned altogether. The foremost discursive premise, upon which the authors build their line of argumentation, can be outlined as follows: the very fact that this type of punishment has been used since the dawn of history, suggests it is indeed fully consistent with the laws of evolution – the main driving force behind humanity’s continual advancement. Hence, the hypothesized positive effects:

Corporal punishment, administered (moderately) by parents to their children, helps the latter to develop the sense of social responsibility and the ability to understand the dialectical relationship between causes and effects. The logic behind this suggestion is that, while subjected to such punishment (properly administered), children are likely to think of it as ‘fair’, simply because on an intuitive level, they know that their parents do not wish them any harm, as something that has the value of a ‘thing in itself’. In its turn, this helps the punished to recognize the long-term beneficence of having been forced to go through the ordeal. The suggestion’s validity is being indirectly supported by the fact that, even though there is indeed much of a public outcry to ban corporal punishment, many empirical studies, concerned with defining the negative psychological effects of such punishment on children, imply that the practice in question is not quite as morally wicked, as it is being commonly assumed. According to Benatar: “Although there is evidence that excessive corporal punishment can significantly increase the chances of psychological harm (on children), most of the psychological data are woefully inadequate to the task of demonstrating that mild and infrequent corporal punishment has such consequences” (242). The fact that many adults reflect upon having been corporally punished by their parents in the past, as such that did them a great deal of good, serves as yet additional proof of the validity of this point of view. Benatar suggests that this simply could not be otherwise. Due to being cognitively underdeveloped, children are naturally driven to form their behavioral attitudes reactively to whatever happens to be the externally induced stimuli. What it means is that if parents are being quick enough to ensure that their children associate delinquency with pain (humiliation), it will indeed have a strongly positive effect on these children’s ability to choose in favor of the socially appropriate way of addressing life-challenges.
Corporal punishment helps children to become emotionally adjusted to the actual ways of the world. Even though that in the civilized society, people’s violent attitudes are being condemned, it does not change the fact that violence remains the ultimate instrument of ensuring that citizens act in the socially appropriate manner – the existence of such institution as police, supports the validity of this claim. Moreover, the factor of violence continues to have a strong effect on the qualitative dynamics of the relationship between the society members – even if it is being extrapolated in the seemingly non-violent form. The reason for this is that, regardless of what appears to be the existential mode of a particular person, he or she inevitably strives to attain dominance within the society. In its turn, this creates the objective preconditions for the presence of semi-violent tensions within even the most advanced/tolerant society. Therefore, by subjecting children to corporal punishment, parents help their young ones to become accustomed to the idea that life itself is rather ‘unfair’, which in turn has a positive effect on the measure of these children’s existential competitiveness. As Benatar suggested: “There is no reason why children should not learn about it (violence). Punishing children when they do wrong seems to be one important way of doing this” (246). Essentially the same line of reasoning drives the practice of forcing children to attend the classes of sex-education – the sooner they learn about the technical aspects of the ‘baby-making’ process, the better. Similarly, the sooner the child learns that pain (either physical or mental) is the actual price for making wrong decisions in life; the more likely it will be for him or she considers the would-be consequences of choosing in favor of a particular course of action while trying to make the best out of life.
The application of corporal punishment against boys helps to maintain society’s structural integrity. The logic behind this suggestion is that, while being administered this type of punishment, boys are expected to refrain from reacting to the ordeal in an emotionally charged manner, such as crying, for example. Thus, along with serving as the correctional tool, corporal punishment serves the function of teaching boys how to repress their feminine anxieties – something that in turn leads towards strengthening the factor of gender-differentiation within the society. As Mechling pointed out: “(Corporal punishment) performed in the carefully framed ritual… is not the product of testosterone out of control. Rather, the critics of hazing need to understand that safe hazing practices such as paddling play a crucial role in the social and psychological construction of heterosexual masculinity” (70). The reason why this factor needs to be strengthened is that, as practice indicates, for men and women to be able to form long-lasting marital relationships, they need to be strongly affiliated with the ‘masculine’ and ‘feminine’ values, respectively. This, in turn, implies that the process of the notion of corporal punishment falling out of favor with more and more people is not quite as objective as it may seem to be. Rather, it is being reflective of the fact that Western societies grow increasingly feminized.

It is understood, of course, that both articles cannot be considered thoroughly consistent with the discourse of political correctness, because they promote the idea that the continual use of corporal punishment on children has been dialectically predetermined. This, however, does not lessen the degree of both articles’ discursive usefulness. In the future, the authors could consider inquiring into whether the elements of corporal punishment could be incorporated into the alternative (non-punitive) methods of disciplining children.

The alternative (non-punitive) methods of disciplining children.

Discipline without punishment.

This article discusses different violent disciplinary acts that are directed towards children and their effect on the growth and development of the minors. According to the author, the role of parenting involves proactive reasoning and being in control of children’s lives to create a global citizen. The process has no specific role, but a cluster of adult responsibilities such as providing basic needs, love, and moral support in all spheres of life.

The author suggests alternatives to using violence to discipline children with the same or better results. According to the author, the first step is defining basic family and society morals that oppose violence, however mild it is. A responsible parent should make sure these aspects are internalized in their thought patterns when planning or executing disciplinary acts on children. For instance, a parent might offer corrective punishment for any unbecoming behavior by using dialogue as a correction tool with very effective results without having any physical or psychological pain on a child.

The author is categorical that using violence to discipline a child “may turn out to be harmful, especially when the parent or teacher is overcome by emotions in the process” (Wilson par. 9). The author suggests alternatives to using violence to discipline children with the same or better results. A responsible parent should make sure these aspects are internalized in their thought patterns when planning or executing disciplinary acts on children. For instance, a parent might “offer corrective punishment for any unbecoming behavior through using dialogue as a correction tool with very effective results without inflicting any physical or psychological pain on a child” (Wilson par. 11). The quotes highlight alternatives to using violence to discipline a child, such as dialogue and instigating psychological adjustment variables such as control of depression, self-esteem, and life satisfaction among the children.

Effective Discipline for Children

The article, Effective Discipline for Children , discusses moderate discipline on child development as compared to using violence. According to the authors, child development depends on a lot of factors. These factors include love, caring, provision of basic needs, and security. Reflectively, a violent disciplinarian parent is likely to put children at a glaring risk of total behavioral, emotional, mental, and social development of child physical and psychological aspects of growth.

Children exposed to violent disciplinary actions by parents, guardians, or teachers are vulnerable to depression, eating disorders, and even unending anxiety. Some of the characteristics of a child exposed to continuous violent disciplinary acts include poor physical and psychological health, trauma, fear, irresponsible, and rudeness behavior among peers.

In the ideal, “an effective discipline does not instill shame, negative guilt, and a sense of abandonment or a loss of trust. Instead, it instills a sense of greater trust between the child and the parent” (Nieman et al. 38). The authors are categorical that “parents should refrain from hurting the child’s self-esteem by instilling shame, guilt, loss of trust, or a sense of abandonment” (Nieman et al. 40). These quotes highlight the negative effects of using violence to discipline children.

The authors of these two articles do agree that parents/teachers should consider resorting to the alternative (non-punitive) strategies when addressing children’s delinquency. In particular, the authors make numerous references to the following alternative approaches to introducing children to the notion of discipline, without subjecting them to corporal punishment:

Making an analytical inquiry into why a particular child misbehaves, to find the circumstantially justified non-punitive method for influencing his or her behavior for the better. As it was pointed out earlier, the discursive paradigm of corporal punishment can no longer be considered thoroughly consistent with the realities of today’s living – something that both authors never cease stressing out, throughout the entirety of their articles. For example, according to Wilson: “Punishment stops bad behavior for the moment. Punishment does not teach the behavior you want. Punishment does not cause good behavior” (1). The reason for this is that, in light of recent discoveries in the field of genetics, the child’s tendency to act in one way or another appears to be rather biologically than environmentally predetermined. The case of autistic children illustrates the validity of this suggestion perfectly well. After all, it does not make any secret that these children are known for their strongly defined anti-social attitudes, which at times appear to be intentionally malicious. Yet, it would prove utterly inappropriate to subject autistic kids to corporal punishment – the would-be undertaken measure will have no positive effect, whatsoever. Therefore, parents and teachers should consider resorting to non-violent methods of influencing children’s behavior. One of them would be trying to appeal to the child’s sense of rationale – especially if he or she is old enough to understand the meaning of the ethics-related terms. As Wilson suggested: “Ask the child the reason for the misbehavior before you punish. Allow the child a chance to explain. Children do not think like adults. The child’s motive may have been good” (2329-4). It is understood, of course, that this particular intervention-strategy is much more time-consuming, as compared to spanking/paddling, for example. Yet, there is a good reason to believe that parents/teachers should prioritize it when it comes to disciplining children.
Providing children with anticipatory guidance, in regards to what accounts for the negative effects of delinquency. This idea reflects the assumption that: “Undesirable behaviors are best avoided through prevention and by building supportive structures that include clear, consistent rules” (Nieman, Alberta, Shea and Scotia 37). The best approach for parents/teachers to proceed with doing it is by holding informal conversations with children while telling them that there is a good reason for people to behave in a socially appropriate manner. Even though there can be no guarantee that the deployment of this delinquency-prevention strategy will prove utterly effective, parents/teachers should still consider resorting to it, as the means to give children yet another reason to think of adults as their friends and mentors, rather than the enemies.
Providing non-punitive incentives for children to refrain from misbehaving. As of today, it becomes increasingly clear to educators that, within the context of a parent/teacher applying the ‘stick and carrot’ approach towards addressing the child’s misbehavior, the emphasis should be placed on enthralling the young one with the prospect of receiving the ‘carrot’. In plain words, when it comes to correcting the child, parents and teachers should never cease being observant of the fact that, due to being concerned with trying to achieve instant gratification, as an integral part of their existential mode, children are more than capable of indulging in the socially productive behavior. Provided, of course, that they associate it with the prospect of receiving a much-desired reward. In its turn, this presupposes that the important element of effective parenting is assessing the subtleties of the child’s psychological makeup – something that can be achieved by the earlier mentioned non-punitive method of anticipatory guidance: “Anticipatory guidance offers… an opportunity for prevention, to discuss the type of discipline according to the child’s developmental age” (Nieman, Alberta, Shea and Scotia 38).

In light of these insights, inferred from both articles, there can be only a few doubts that the manners, in which the affiliated authors went about arguing what can be deemed the most effective methods of addressing children’s delinquency, are indeed mutually complementary. At the same time, however, many suggestions, contained in the reviewed articles, appear rather formulaic. Had the authors provided more references to the discursively relevant empirical studies (in support of the promoted ideas), it would contribute rather substantially to the measure of these articles’ objectiveness.

Additional insights into the discussed subject matter

Corporal punishment in u.s. public schools: a continuing challenge for school social workers.

The main thesis, promoted by Dupper and Dingus throughout their article’s entirety, is that the appropriateness/inappropriateness of the practice of subjecting children to corporal punishment, cannot be thought of in terms of a ‘thing in itself’, in the social sense of this word. That is, the actual essence of the ethical outlook on it, shared by most people, is predetermined by the currently predominant socio-cultural discourse.

According to the authors, this is the reason why the practice in question is being considered legal in the U.S. Southern states – in this part of the country, the social influence of Christianity (the religion that endorses physical punishment of children) continues to remain rather considerable. Nevertheless, Dupper and Dingus do not doubt the objectiveness of the fact that there is a negative correlation between the popularity of corporal punishment, as the instrument of children’s ‘correction’, and the quality of living standards in the affiliated area. This, of course, endows their article with the clearly defined progressive sounding.

“The use of corporal punishment in schools is associated with damaging physical and psychological outcomes that can affect some children for the remainder of their lives” (Dupper and Dingus 245). “Higher rates of child abuse fatalities occur in states that allow corporal punishment in the schools, and students are more likely to die from school shootings in states where corporal punishment is used” (Dupper and Dingus 246).

Discipline for Young Children-Discipline and Punishment: What is the Difference?

This article discusses conflicts that might arise between parents in the process of disciplining children. The article is categorical that poor conflict management tools may lead to the use of violence on children in the name of exercising disciplinary authority. Even though most of the parents have the best interest of the child, conflict arises when they do not attend the necessary training on how to handle children (Telep par. 7).

For instance, the author discusses a conflict situation involving one of the parents and the organization on the need to attend obligatory training on foster parenting. As a strategy for managing this conflict, the stakeholders in child protection from aggression should engage the parents in foster care training to ensure that there is no conflict with the child when it comes to discipline and parenting (Telep par. 7).

Therefore, “conflict can be used as a tool for proactive child correction through looking beyond the conventional violent disciplinary strategy” (Telep par. 11). One of such programs proposed by the author is the RDRESS program. RDRESS is an abbreviation for Resolving Disputes and Reaching an Equitable Solution Swiftly. This model involves “proactive problem identification and examination of the impact of mediation on the child’s integrity” (Telep par. 14). The quotes highlight the need for proactive disciplinary actions to avoid the counterproductive results that arise from using violence to discipline children.

Both of the summarized articles are valuable, in the sense of helping readers to gain a better understanding of what makes the practice of corporal punishment to continue being used against children, even though it sparks much public controversy. In this respect, we can accentuate the following insights of relevance:

The qualitative aspects of the concerned practice should be discussed in conjunction with what happened to be the practitioners’ religious stance: “Often, attitudes toward physical punishment reflect religious beliefs and ideas about what children are like” (Telep par. 21). Regardless of what happened to be the actual form of corporal punishment, it reflects essentially the same discursive premise – it is possible to ‘correct’ the behavioral model of a young person by making him or her associate its anti-social behavior (as perceived by parents/teachers) with the sensation of a strong emotional/physical discomfort, induced by the application of corporal punishment. In its turn, this can be thought of as the remnant of the Judeo-Christian outlook on the process of the child’s upbringing. After all, it does not represent any secret that even today, many Christians believe that it is possible for ‘demons’ to invade one’s body, to turn it into their sanctuary – something that used to be traditionally perceived, as the reason why some children exhibit a rather intolerable behavior. Therefore, it was thoroughly logical, on the part of religious people to assume that, by inflicting pain to the body of the misbehaving child, they would be able to make ‘demons’ to consider leaving it for good. This explains why the practice of subjecting children to corporal punishment is being particularly popular throughout the so-called ‘Bible belt’ in America: “The southern and southwestern states practice a traditional, conservative, Evangelical Protestant religion, in which literal interpretations of the Bible are very common, and in which the Bible is often used to support and even demand that parents use corporal punishment on their children” (Dupper and Dingus 246). What it means is that, even though the concerned practice does exhibit the indications of being hardly justified, it is likely to remain the essential part of the process of parenting – especially in the families/schools, associated with the ‘traditional’ values.
While deciding in favor/disfavor of corporate punishment, parents/teachers should be mindful of the main psychological principles of how children tend to address life-challenges. The emergence of psychology, as a fully legitimate science, during the 20th century’s initial decades, revealed the sheer fallaciousness of the religious view on how parents/teachers should go about disciplining children. The reason for this apparent – this particular development produced a powerful effect on people’s perception of what is the driving force behind the child’s tendency to act in one way or another. It simply could not be otherwise – it is specifically the workings of one’s unconscious psyche, which define the concerned person’s individuality more than anything else does. Nevertheless, because these workings are not the subject of rationalization, there can be very little point in expecting that the child’s existential stance can be ‘corrected’ by the mean of encouraging him or her to conclude that, since delinquency results in pain, he or she would much better off staying away from the former. As Telep noted: “The child who has been treated harshly has no reason to be good. Or he may be good just to keep from being punished and not learn to be good because he thinks it is the right thing to do” (par. 6). This, in turn, calls for the reassessment of the very conceptual premise of corporate punishment. Hence, Telep’s suggestion that instead of learning not to misbehave from ‘pain’, children should learn from ‘experiences’: “Parents should tell the child before it happens, what the consequences are for breaking a rule. If the child knows that the consequence of not getting to the dinner table in time to eat with the family is not eating, then he has a choice” (par. 27). It is understood, of course, that this claim is far from being considered undisputed. However, it does illustrate the appropriateness of the suggestion that parents should pay close attention to what are the deep-seated psychological needs of their children. Because this idea is being explored throughout the entirety of both articles, there is a good rationale to think that they are indeed discursively related. The focus of additional research, in this respect, could be concerned with inquiring into what parents/teachers should do, to increase the measure of their awareness of how the child’s unconscious psyche functions.

In light of the earlier mentioned insights, as to the effects of corporal punishment on children, it can be safely assumed that, as time goes on; this type of punishment will continue being widely deployed – the practice’s very ‘convenience’ and ‘cost-effectiveness’ (as seen by parents and teachers) create the objective prerequisites for this to be the case. Another contributing factor, in this respect, is the absence of the scientifically legitimate methodology for disciplining children in a strictly non-punitive manner – suggesting that it is wrong to subject children to violence, is not enough.

At the same time, however, the measure of this punishment’s severity is likely to be progressively reduced, which in turn should come as the consequence of people’s growing awareness of the fact that administering corporal punishment to children is not only ethically dubious but that it is also something that balances on the edge of the law. This trend’s actual logic presupposes the ever increased popularity of the alternative approaches to correcting children’s behavior, such as the mentioned earlier ‘anticipatory guidance’.

Works Cited

Benatar, David. “Corporal Punishment.” Social Theory and Practice 24.2 (1998): 237-260. Print.

Dupper, David R., and Amy E. Montgomery Dingus. “Corporal Punishment in U.S. Public Schools: A Continuing Challenge for School Social Workers.” Children & Schools 30.4 (2008): 243-50. Print.

Lenta, Patrick. “Corporal Punishment of Children.” Social Theory and Practice 38.4 (2012): 689-716. Print.

Mechling, Jay. “Paddling and the Repression of the Feminine in Male Hazing.” Thymos 2.1 (2008): 60-75. Print.

Nieman, Peter, Calgary Alberta, Sarah Shea and Nova Scotia . “Effective Discipline for Children.” Paediatrics & Child Health 9.1 (2004): 37–41. Print.

Samakow, Jessica. What Science Says About Using Physical Force to Punish a Child ? 2014. Web.

Saunders, Bernadette and Chris Goddard. Physical Punishment in Childhood: The Rights of the Child . New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2009. Print.

Telep, Valya. Discipline for Young Children-Discipline and Punishment: What is the Difference? 2014. Web.

Wilson, Elaine. Discipline without Punishment. 2010. Web.

Familial Violence and Corporal Punishment Approval
Social Issues: Corporal Punishment
Judicial Corporal Punishment: An Update
Child, Youth and Family Intervention
Psychology: Drug Impact and Use Prevention
Childhood Sexual Abuse and False Memories
Child Abuse: Altruistic Behavior
The Effects of Forgiveness Therapy
Chicago (A-D)
Chicago (N-B)

IvyPanda. (2021, March 27). Negative Effects of Children’s Corporal Punishment. https://ivypanda.com/essays/negative-effects-of-children-corporal-punishment/

"Negative Effects of Children’s Corporal Punishment." IvyPanda , 27 Mar. 2021, ivypanda.com/essays/negative-effects-of-children-corporal-punishment/.

IvyPanda . (2021) 'Negative Effects of Children’s Corporal Punishment'. 27 March.

IvyPanda . 2021. "Negative Effects of Children’s Corporal Punishment." March 27, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/negative-effects-of-children-corporal-punishment/.

1. IvyPanda . "Negative Effects of Children’s Corporal Punishment." March 27, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/negative-effects-of-children-corporal-punishment/.

Bibliography

IvyPanda . "Negative Effects of Children’s Corporal Punishment." March 27, 2021. https://ivypanda.com/essays/negative-effects-of-children-corporal-punishment/.

Home / Essay Samples / Social Issues / Human Rights / Corporal Punishment

Corporal Punishment Essay Examples

Pro death penalty personal statement.

Capital Punishment: the pro death penalty essay with personal statement. The most severe sentence that is banned in many countries but is still practiced in most states of the U.S. is capital punishment, (execution) or better known as the death penalty. There are five methods...

Christian Viewpoint on Why the Death Penalty Should Be Abolished

“An eye for an eye and tooth for a tooth would lead to a world of the blind and toothless.” This quote from the book of Exodus in the Holy Bible summarizes how many feel about the controversial topic of the death penalty. The death...

Legal Systems and Corporal Punishment in Different Countries

According to Reichel, “today legal scholars identify three or four legal traditions (some call them legal families)”. They are the following: Common, Islamic, and Eastern Asia traditions. Among the countries which represent them we can find U. A. E. , China, England. Common legal traditions...

The Prevalence and Consequences of Corporal Punishment in America

After reviewing the literature on the topic of corporal punishment and other disciplinary methods of parenting in the United States, the prevalence and consequences of corporal punishment are evident. I will be discussing my findings from my literature review on physical punishment and will examine...

Way of the Rod Analysis

The Way of the Rod, a Paper by Ben Parsons, seeks to clarify the uses and functions of corporal punishment in late medieval education. Parsons states that, “Its focus will be the rationales developed by late medieval pedagogues, educational theorists, and other commentators. Flogging will...

Color Parents Always Used Corporal Punishment

“This is going to hurt me more than it will hurt you”. “Stop crying before I give you something to cry about” These are common phases used in young adult literature to portray people of color’s parenting skills. Why is it that authors depict people...

Corporal Punishments Influence on Children Mental Health

When a kid hits another kid we call him a bully, when someone hits another person in order to steal we call him a mugger, when a man hits his wife we call him abusive, but when a man hits his helpless children in order...

The Decline in the Use of Corporal Punishments in Europe

“A villain truly deserving of this horror of nature in its entirety, condemned to see no longer the heaven that he has outraged and to live no longer on the earth that he has sullied, above the punitive city hangs this iron spider; and the...

Corporal Punishment and Its Psychological Outcomes

For many years the use of corporal punishment was considered okay and right, but recent affairs show that there is a misunderstanding of corporal punishment and actual abuse and humiliation. There has been a perspective shift with regards to corporal punishment. This study aims to...

The Danger of School Violence

More than half of the world's students are experiencing school violence. According to research, about 150 million students between the ages of 13 and 15 say they have experienced peer violence on or off campus. And not only the injuries between classmates and peers, but...

Trying to find an excellent essay sample but no results?

Don’t waste your time and get a professional writer to help!

Creative samples from the experts

Argumentative Essay: Should Corporal Punishment Have a Place in Education?

Follow Us on Social Media

Get more free essays

Send via email

Contributors Bio

Find more useful services for students

Research Paper

Corporal Punishment, Research Paper Example

Related Research Paper Samples & Examples

Impacts on Patients and Healthcare Workers in Canada, Research Paper Example

Death by Neurological Criteria, Research Paper Example

Ethical Considerations in End-Of-Life Care, Research Paper Example

Ethical Dilemmas in Brain Death, Research Paper Example

Politics of Difference and the Case of School Uniforms, Research Paper Example

The Controversy Surrounding Corporal Punishment: a Critical Analysis of its Efficacy

Cite this page

Don't let plagiarism ruin your grade

Corporal Punishment Essay

Historical context

Psychological implications

The ethical conundrum

Alternatives to corporal punishment

Corporal Punishment As A Kind Of Physical Child Abuse

Corporal Punishment In Schools: Apparatus Of Mending Or Oppression

Corporal Punishment And Child Rights Violation

Join our 150k of happy users

Negative Effects of Children’s Corporal Punishment

The negative physical/psychological effects of corporate punishment on children.

Physical Punishment in Childhood: The Rights of the Child. New York: John Wiley & Sons

Corporal Punishment of Children

The positive psychological/physical effects of corporal punishment on children (as seen by some authors)

Paddling and the Repression of the Feminine in Male Hazing

The alternative (non-punitive) methods of disciplining children.

Effective Discipline for Children

Additional insights into the discussed subject matter

Discipline for Young Children-Discipline and Punishment: What is the Difference?

Works Cited

Corporal Punishment Essay Examples

Christian Viewpoint on Why the Death Penalty Should Be Abolished

Legal Systems and Corporal Punishment in Different Countries

The Prevalence and Consequences of Corporal Punishment in America

Way of the Rod Analysis

Color Parents Always Used Corporal Punishment

Corporal Punishments Influence on Children Mental Health

The Decline in the Use of Corporal Punishments in Europe

Corporal Punishment and Its Psychological Outcomes

The Danger of School Violence

You may also like