absolute assignment of a life insurance policy

What is Absolute vs Collateral Assignment of Life Insurance?

by Life Credit Company | Mar 15, 2018 | Understanding Your Life Insurance Policy | 2 comments

When you purchase life insurance, you typically do so to prepare for after your death. However, an insurance policy is an owned entity and, as such, can be sold or used as collateral for a loan in order to provide cash value to someone in need.

Just as there are many questions when considering whether to get term insurance or whole life insurance , there are also a lot of factors to consider if you choose to use your policy to access the cash you’ve invested in it. It’s important to understand terms like absolute assignment and collateral assignment, as well as weigh the differences, in order to satisfy your particular financial needs.

What is absolute assignment of life insurance?

Absolute assignment in insurance involves signing over your entire policy to another person or entity. The person who is selling or gifting the policy is known as the assignor, and the individual or individuals who receive it are the assignee. The assignee takes full ownership of the policy, being held liable for any premiums and also having the authority to change or designate new beneficiaries.

What is a collateral assignment of life insurance?

Collateral assignment of life insurance essentially works like a standard loan. The insurance policy is “collateral” for a loan, and the person or organization that pays out that loan is the temporary beneficiary of the policy’s death benefit until the loan is repaid. The entity taking over the policy does so on a conditional basis and, therefore, doesn’t have the authority to make changes to it, re-sell it or take any of its cash value. Instead, the assignee can only draw on the death benefit if the policyholder defaults.

This type of approach is used by Life Credit, through the Living Benefit Loan program, which provides up to half of the value of a death benefit for a policy worth at least $75,000. This loan enables cancer patients and seniors to access immediate and unrestricted assistance to help reduce financial burden.

Compare Life Insurance Policy Assignments

If you’re facing a financial challenge and asking yourself, “ Can my life insurance policy’s cash value help me? ” then one of the most important things you can do is look at the big picture. An absolute assignment type of approach may allow you to generate a lot of quick cash, however, down the line, you or your family will not have any protection and cushion from a life insurance policy. This may be a policy that you have paid into for decades, so losing that value is a significant consideration.

Collateral assignment, on the other hand, enables policy holders to regain control of their own policy once a medical or other crisis has resolved. It is one of the 3 common ways to borrow from your life insurance policy and access the cash value. With a collateral assignment you are able to eventually benefit again from the long-term advantages of a life insurance policy. Most people are used to paying car loans, student loans and mortgages, so treating this agreement similarly and making the requisite payments can help people to not only address their immediate financial concerns but also ensure long-term success.

Contact a Life Credit representative to find out if you qualify for a life insurance loan .

Life Credit Company

We are a licensed consumer lender that is dedicated to providing financial assistance for patients who are facing serious illness. With a Living Benefit Loan, from Life Credit Company, you can receive up to 50% of your life insurance policy’s death benefit today. Whether you need to catch up on medical bills, consolidate debt or take your family on a dream vacation, this is your money to spend without restrictions. If you have at least $75,000 of life insurance and have been diagnosed with cancer or other serious medical condition, you may qualify for a loan. Contact us today to speak with a professional counselor who is standing by to assist you.

Where can I get a collateral loan from? what company offers this type of loan?

Please call us at 844-556-1269 for more information.

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .

Absolute Assignment

What does absolute assignment mean.

Absolute assignment refers to a policyholder transferring his or her ownership of a policy to another party. That transfer means that all of the coverage within that policy will now go to the newly named party. The original owner of the policy does not have to state his or her reasons for doing so nor does he or she need to stipulate any conditions for the transfer.

Insuranceopedia Explains Absolute Assignment

There are a number of reasons why a policyholder transfers all of their rights to a policy to another person or entity. They might think of it as a gift to someone else. It could be the sole means of paying off a loan. Even if the insured has now given up their rights to all of the claims and privileges, they are still responsible for payments for the policy. The new owner might have been asked by the original owner to pay the insurer after the transfer is completed, but if the newly named party fails to do so, the negligence will not be blamed on that person but on the original policyholder.

Related Definitions

Managing general agent (mga), inland marine policy, multiple indemnity, policy reserve, position schedule bond, qualified pension plan, refund annuity, refund life income option, rental value insurance, related terms, transfer by endorsement, noninsurance transfer, risk transfer, insurable interest, non-insurable risk, direct billing, related articles, 5 types of crime insurance policies businesses should consider, choosing the right kind of mortgage, 10 things you need to know about health insurance in the united states, insurance self-service portal: the future of customer experience, blockchain’s impact on transforming the insurance landscape, what every college student should know about renters insurance, related reading, trending articles.

Auto Insurance

Home insurance, health insurance, life insurance, absolute assignment - life insurance.

Compare personalized life insurance rates in your area

Life Insurance Glossary
Absolute Assignment

What is Absolute Assignment in Life Insurance?

<lingo>In life insurance, the term absolute assignment refers to the transfer of all interest, rights, and ownership of an asset â€” in this case, the life insurance policy. This decision is irrevocable, which means it cannot be changed once it is in place. It also applies both to the present and in the future. For those who are purchasing a life insurance policy, it is important to look for a clause like this in the details and to understand what it means to use absolute assignment. In short, all rights and ownership of the policy are being given to another person, specifically listed in the policy.</lingo>

Absolute Assignment Clearly and Briefly Explained

There are numerous reasons why you may wish to pursue an absolute assignment. For example, it may be used in the process of providing collateral for a loan to a lender. In addition to this, some may elect to use this when you wish to donate the proceeds from your life insurance policy to a charity or award them to a specific purpose after your death.

<twitter>In life insurance, the term absolute assignment refers to the transfer of all interest, rights, and ownership of an asset â€” in this case, the life insurance policy. </twitter>

One way to look at absolute assignment is that it allows you to transfer ownership â€” all ownership â€” to another party. When you make this transfer, you remain covered under the life insurance policy. However, the new owner of the policy has the right to make changes to it. For example, they can change the beneficiary of the policy. Most often, this will be done to change the beneficiary of the life insurance policy to the new ownerâ€™s name. In addition, the new owner now has the ability to make all decisions regarding the underlying assets within the investment. The only thing that the new owner cannot do is to eliminate the coverage of the plan.

When absolute assignment occurs, you continue to make payments on it. One common use of this is when you are taking out a loan and the bank is concerned about your age or health. They may require you to take out a life insurance policy and assign absolute assignment. This would help cover the value of the loan should you die while it is in place.

<zipcode>Get the best rates in your area and start saving:</zipcode>

Insurance By State AK AL AR AZ CA CO CT DE FL GA HI IA ID IL IN KA KY LA MA MD ME MI MN MO MS MT NC ND NE NH NJ NM NV NY OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VA VT WE WI WV WY
No-Fault State
Collision Insurance
Gap Insurance
Liability Coverage
Proof of Insurance
Does Car Insurance Cover Natural Disasters?
Things to Do While Driving
Car Parking Safety Tips
How to Prevent Hood Ornament Theft
Losing Focus While Driving: Prevention Tips and Tricks
Home Insurance By State
Home Insurance Glossary
Home Insurance Buyer Guide
Health Insurance By State
Health Insurance Glossary
Health Insurance Buyer Guide
Life Insurance By State
Life Insurance Buyer Guide
Work With Us
Advertising Disclosure
Privacy Policy
California Privacy Rights
CCPA Request Webform
Terms of Use

800-556-9393

800-324-6370

Home » Articles Library » 2 Ways to Transfer Ownership of a Life Insurance Policy

2 Ways to Transfer Ownership of a Life Insurance Policy

Things to Know about Borrowing Against Your Life Insurance Policy

As property, policyowners can transfer their life insurance contracts to other persons or entities. A policyowner can transfer either all or only some of the “bundle of rights” that comprises a life insurance policy to almost any person or entity.

The two basic ways of making a lifetime transfer of a policy are: (1) the absolute assignment; and (2) the collateral assignment. An absolute assignment, as its name implies, transfers all the policyowner’s rights irrevocably. A collateral assignment, again as its name implies, assigns so much of the death benefit as necessary for as long as necessary to secure a lender’s rights. But no more of the proceeds will go to the lender than the amount of debt owed.

Requirements

The assignment does not have to be of any particular form (absent specific provisions in state law or the contract to the contrary). Because life insurance is treated as personal property, policyowner may transfer ownership rights, not only by many different types of documents, but also by many different actions. For example, if a person sells a business and the business owns a life insurance policy, the sale of all the assets of the business carries with it the personal property the business owned – including the life insurance.

Likewise, a property settlement in connection with a divorce may have the effect of transferring the ownership of life insurance on the life of one or the other (or both) spouse(s) even though no one ever uses the word “assignment” with regard to these transfers. But this type of transfer (where a clause in the divorce decree disposes of life insurance) is both very dangerous and very awkward. If a policyowner names his new spouse as beneficiary of the insurance proceeds and the insurer has no notice or knowledge of the divorce decree’s change, both spouses are likely to claim the proceeds. Furthermore, if the decree requires the policyowner spouse to maintain the policy for the benefit of his or her ex-spouse, the policyowner cannot obtain a policy loan-even to keep the policy in force through a premium loan.

Before either the absolute or collateral type of assignment or any other instance of a policy ownership transfer is valid, the policyowner must notify the insurer (and, where required by the terms of the contract, the insurer must consent to the assignment). Once notified in writing at the insurer’s home office, the insurer must honor the policyowner’s transfer—unless the terms of the contract itself forbid assignments. So if the insurer then disregards (by intention or neglect) the assignee’s rights and makes payment to someone else, the courts may force the insurer to make a second payment to the assignee. If the policyowner gives no notice to the insurer, it will be protected in a transaction initiated by a former owner. For instance, if the former owner applies for a policy loan and he has not given the insurer proper notice that he had assigned the policy, the insurer is protected in making that loan.

The insurer does not, however, have to verify the bona fides of the transaction between the policyowner and the transferee nor the validity of the transaction. In other words, the insurer is not accountable for the mental or legal capacity of the policyowner to make the assignment (unless it had knowledge that the policyowner was not legally competent to make it or there were irregularities in the assignment form).

Absolute Assignments

Policyowners use an absolute assignment in life insurance planning when the policyowner wants to sell or give away all of his or her rights under the contract. The goal might be to obtain valuable consideration, to save estate taxes, avoid creditors, or purely for love and affection and to assure the transferee of financial security. There are many common examples of sales and gifts:

A client might sell a policy on his life to his business.
A business might sell a policy on an employee’s life to the employee or to the employee’s spouse or child or trust (or to a pension plan).
A shareholder might sell a policy on his life to a new business associate.
A client might give a policy on her life to her spouse.
A client might give a policy on his life to his children or to a family trust.

Tax Implications

Both sales and gift transactions have important and sometimes unexpectedly expensive tax implications. Planners should thoroughly research before allowing any sale of a life insurance policy. Also, understand what should be considered before allowing a client to make a gift of a policy. A valid gift requires that the donor have contractual capacity and intent to make a voluntary gratuitous transfer and the gift must be delivered to and accepted by the donee (assignee).

Nontax Implications

Planners must be aware of the nontax implications of an absolute assignment in order to avoid them and/or alert the client to their potential effect. Some of these are:

Although an absolute assignment itself may not per se change the interest of a revocable beneficiary, as a practical matter the new owner can immediately change the beneficiary and often makes that change almost simultaneously with the assignment. Some absolute assignment forms state that the new owner is automatically the primary policy beneficiary until the new owner makes a change to the beneficiary designation.

If the policyowner made an irrevocable beneficiary designation before making an absolute assignment of the policy, in most states the assignment will not defeat that designation (without the written consent of the beneficiary) and the transferee should be apprised of this fact.

Absolute assignments may put the policy and its proceeds beyond the claims of the policyowner’s creditors, but planners should inform policyowner that—like diamonds—an absolute assignment is forever. There is a loss of both control and flexibility from the transferor’s viewpoint.

What Is a Collateral Assignment of Life Insurance?

absolute assignment of a life insurance policy

Charlene Rhinehart is a CPA , CFE, chair of an Illinois CPA Society committee, and has a degree in accounting and finance from DePaul University.

A collateral assignment of life insurance is a conditional assignment appointing a lender as an assignee of a policy. Essentially, the lender has a claim to some or all of the death benefit until the loan is repaid. The death benefit is used as collateral for a loan.

The advantage to using a collateral assignee over naming the lender as a beneficiary is that you can specify that the lender is only entitled to a certain amount, namely the amount of the outstanding loan. That would allow your beneficiaries still be entitled to any remaining death benefit.

Lenders commonly require that life insurance serve as collateral for a business loan to guarantee repayment if the borrower dies or defaults. They may even require you to get a life insurance policy to be approved for a business loan.

Key Takeaways

The borrower of a business loan using life insurance as collateral must be the policy owner, who may or may not be the insured.
The collateral assignment helps you avoid naming a lender as a beneficiary.
The collateral assignment may be against all or part of the policy's value.
If any amount of the death benefit remains after the lender is paid, it is distributed to beneficiaries.
Once the loan is fully repaid, the life insurance policy is no longer used as collateral.

How a Collateral Assignment of Life Insurance Works

Collateral assignments make sure the lender gets paid only what they are due. The borrower must be the owner of the policy, but they do not have to be the insured person. And the policy must remain current for the life of the loan, with the policy owner continuing to pay all premiums . You can use either term or whole life insurance policy as collateral, but the death benefit must meet the lender's terms.

A permanent life insurance policy with a cash value allows the lender access to the cash value to use as loan payment if the borrower defaults. Many lenders don't accept term life insurance policies as collateral because they do not accumulate cash value.

Alternately, the policy owner's access to the cash value is restricted to protect the collateral. If the loan is repaid before the borrower's death, the assignment is removed, and the lender is no longer the beneficiary of the death benefit.

Insurance companies must be notified of the collateral assignment of a policy. However, other than their obligation to meet the terms of the contract, they are not involved in the agreement.

Example of Collateral Assignment of Life Insurance

For example, say you have a business plan for a floral shop and need a $50,000 loan to get started. When you apply for the loan, the bank says you must have collateral in the form of a life insurance policy to back it up. You have a whole life insurance policy with a cash value of $65,000 and a death benefit of $300,000, which the bank accepts as collateral.

So, you then designate the bank as the policy's assignee until you repay the $50,000 loan. That way, the bank can ensure it will be repaid the funds it lent you, even if you died. In this case, because the cash value and death benefit is more than what you owe the lender, your beneficiaries would still inherit money.

Alternatives to Collateral Assignment of Life Insurance

Using a collateral assignment to secure a business loan can help you access the funds you need to start or grow your business. However, you would be at risk of losing your life insurance policy if you defaulted on the loan, meaning your beneficiaries may not receive the money you'd planned for them to inherit.

Consult with a financial advisor to discuss whether a collateral assignment or one of these alternatives may be most appropriate for your financial situation.

Life insurance loan (policy loan) : If you already have a life insurance policy with a cash value, you can likely borrow against it. Policy loans are not taxed and have less stringent requirements such as no credit or income checks. However, this option would not work if you do not already have a permanent life insurance policy because the cash value component takes time to build.

Surrendering your policy : You can also surrender your policy to access any cash value you've built up. However, your beneficiaries would no longer receive a death benefit.

Other loan types : Finally, you can apply for other loans, such as a personal loan, that do not require life insurance as collateral. You could use loans that rely on other types of collateral, such as a home equity loan that uses your home equity.

What Are the Benefits of Collateral Assignment of Life Insurance?

A collateral assignment of a life insurance policy may be required if you need a business loan. Lenders typically require life insurance as collateral for business loans because they guarantee repayment if the borrower dies. A policy with cash value can guarantee repayment if the borrower defaults.

What Kind of Life Insurance Can Be Used for Collateral?

You can typically use any type of life insurance policy as collateral for a business loan, depending on the lender's requirements. A permanent life insurance policy with a cash value allows the lender a source of funds to use if the borrower defaults. Some lenders may not accept term life insurance policies, which have no cash value. The lender will typically require the death benefit be a certain amount, depending on your loan size.

Is Collateral Assignment of Life Insurance Irrevocable?

A collateral assignment of life insurance is irrevocable. So, the policyholder may not use the cash value of a life insurance policy dedicated toward collateral for a loan until that loan has been repaid.

What is the Difference Between an Assignment and a Collateral Assignment?

With an absolute assignment , the entire ownership of the policy would be transferred to the assignee, or the lender. Then, the lender would be entitled to the full death benefit. With a collateral assignment, the lender is only entitled to the balance of the outstanding loan.

The Bottom Line

If you are applying for life insurance to secure your own business loan, remember you do not need to make the lender the beneficiary. Instead you can use a collateral assignment. Consult a financial advisor or insurance broker who can walk you through the process and explain its pros and cons as they apply to your situation.

Progressive. " Collateral Assignment of Life Insurance ."

Fidelity Life. " What Is a Collateral Assignment of a Life Insurance Policy? "

Kansas Legislative Research Department. " Collateral Assignment of Life Insurance Proceeds ."

Terms of Service
Editorial Policy
Privacy Policy
Your Privacy Choices

What Is a Life Insurance Assignment?

Conditional Assignment

With a conditional assignment, although you transfer your life insurance policy’s ownership rights to another party, the assignment stipulates that if a certain specified event occurs, the assignment can be suspended or revoked in whole or in part. The event in question cannot be something that you can cause to happen. If you assigned your life insurance policy to a business partner, for example, with the explicit agreement that on the death of that business partner the assignment is revoked, that assignment is deemed conditional.

Absolute Assignment

When you make an absolute assignment, the rights, title and interest in the life insurance policy pass on to another party without the possibility of reversal. The assignment provides security to the assignee in that you can no longer make decisions regarding the policy that would jeopardize it, such as taking out a policy loan or withdrawing cash values.

Secured Loan

If you own a business, and you wish to take out a loan for your business, the lender may require you to purchase life insurance on your own life as security for the loan. Initially you make the request for the insurance. Once the policy is approved and issued, you make an assignment to the bank. The bank now controls the decisions and can make changes to the policy, including naming itself as beneficiary.

Collateral Loan

If you own a life insurance policy with cash values, you might wish to access those cash values to increase your income flow. Withdrawals from life insurance policy cash values can result in taxes due and might reduce your death benefit. An alternative is to assign the life insurance policy to a lender in exchange for a line of credit or regular loan payments. These loans are generally not taxable, and you can typically borrow up to a stated maximum percentage of the cash value. Since the policy is assigned to the bank, your failure to pay the premiums on the policy will cause the bank to call the loan, cancel the insurance policy and use the cash values as payment of the loan. If you maintain the policy in force until your death, the bank is generally the beneficiary of the tax-free policy proceeds up to and including the outstanding amount of the loan, with any remaining policy proceeds paid tax free to your named beneficiary.

AXA Life: Know Your Insurance

Philippe Lanctot started writing for business trade publications in 1990. He has contributed copy for the "Canadian Insurance Journal" and has been the co-author of text for life insurance company marketing guides. He holds a Bachelor of Science in mathematics from the University of Montreal with a minor in English.

What is the collateral assignment of a life insurance policy, what is the assignment of insurance benefits, absolute assignment of life insurance policies, is mortgage insurance better than life insurance to pay off a mortgage upon death, tapping the cash in life insurance, how does renewing a loan work, tax on withdrawal from life insurance, is life insurance taxed at payout, boat financing tips for consumers, how long can co-signers stay on a mortgage loan, cancelling whole life insurance, how much can i borrow against cash value.

Zacks Research is Reported On:

Zacks Investment Research

is an A+ Rated BBB

Accredited Business.

At the center of everything we do is a strong commitment to independent research and sharing its profitable discoveries with investors. This dedication to giving investors a trading advantage led to the creation of our proven Zacks Rank stock-rating system. Since 1986 it has nearly tripled the S&P 500 with an average gain of +26% per year. These returns cover a period from 1986-2011 and were examined and attested by Baker Tilly, an independent accounting firm.

Visit performance for information about the performance numbers displayed above.

NYSE and AMEX data is at least 20 minutes delayed. NASDAQ data is at least 15 minutes delayed.

Collateral assignment of life insurance

Advertiser disclosure.

We are an independent, advertising-supported comparison service. Our goal is to help you make smarter financial decisions by providing you with interactive tools and financial calculators, publishing original and objective content, by enabling you to conduct research and compare information for free - so that you can make financial decisions with confidence.

Our content is backed by Coverage.com, LLC, a licensed insurance producer (NPN: 19966249). Coverage.com services are only available in states where it is licensed . Coverage.com may not offer insurance coverage in all states or scenarios. All insurance products are governed by the terms in the applicable insurance policy, and all related decisions (such as approval for coverage, premiums, commissions and fees) and policy obligations are the sole responsibility of the underwriting insurer. The information on this site does not modify any insurance policy terms in any way.

How We Make Money

The offers that appear on this site are from companies that compensate us. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site, including, for example, the order in which they may appear within the listing categories, except where prohibited by law for our mortgage, home equity and other home lending products. But this compensation does not influence the information we publish, or the reviews that you see on this site. We do not include the universe of companies or financial offers that may be available to you.

Share this article on Facebook Facebook
Share this article on Twitter Twitter
Share this article on LinkedIn Linkedin
Share this article via email Email

A businessowners shaking hands with an life insurance rep

At Bankrate, we take the accuracy of our content seriously.

“Expert verified” means that our Financial Review Board thoroughly evaluated the article for accuracy and clarity. The Review Board comprises a panel of financial experts whose objective is to ensure that our content is always objective and balanced.

Their reviews hold us accountable for publishing high-quality and trustworthy content.

• Auto insurance
• Life insurance
Connect with Mary Van Keuren on LinkedIn Linkedin
Get in contact with Mary Van Keuren via Email Email

Connect with Natasha Cornelius, CLU on LinkedIn Linkedin

The Bankrate promise

At Bankrate we strive to help you make smarter financial decisions. While we adhere to strict editorial integrity , this post may contain references to products from our partners. Here's an explanation for how we make money . This content is powered by HomeInsurance.com (NPN: 8781838). For more information, please see our Insurance Disclosure .

Founded in 1976, Bankrate has a long track record of helping people make smart financial choices. We’ve maintained this reputation for over four decades by demystifying the financial decision-making process and giving people confidence in which actions to take next.

Bankrate follows a strict editorial policy , so you can trust that we’re putting your interests first. All of our content is authored by highly qualified professionals and edited by subject matter experts , who ensure everything we publish is objective, accurate and trustworthy.

Our banking reporters and editors focus on the points consumers care about most — the best banks, latest rates, different types of accounts, money-saving tips and more — so you can feel confident as you’re managing your money.

Editorial integrity

Bankrate follows a strict editorial policy , so you can trust that we’re putting your interests first. Our award-winning editors and reporters create honest and accurate content to help you make the right financial decisions.

Key Principles

We value your trust. Our mission is to provide readers with accurate and unbiased information, and we have editorial standards in place to ensure that happens. Our editors and reporters thoroughly fact-check editorial content to ensure the information you’re reading is accurate. We maintain a firewall between our advertisers and our editorial team. Our editorial team does not receive direct compensation from our advertisers.

Editorial Independence

Bankrate’s editorial team writes on behalf of YOU – the reader. Our goal is to give you the best advice to help you make smart personal finance decisions. We follow strict guidelines to ensure that our editorial content is not influenced by advertisers. Our editorial team receives no direct compensation from advertisers, and our content is thoroughly fact-checked to ensure accuracy. So, whether you’re reading an article or a review, you can trust that you’re getting credible and dependable information.

How we make money

You have money questions. Bankrate has answers. Our experts have been helping you master your money for over four decades. We continually strive to provide consumers with the expert advice and tools needed to succeed throughout life’s financial journey.

Bankrate follows a strict editorial policy , so you can trust that our content is honest and accurate. Our award-winning editors and reporters create honest and accurate content to help you make the right financial decisions. The content created by our editorial staff is objective, factual, and not influenced by our advertisers.

We’re transparent about how we are able to bring quality content, competitive rates, and useful tools to you by explaining how we make money.

Bankrate.com is an independent, advertising-supported publisher and comparison service. We are compensated in exchange for placement of sponsored products and, services, or by you clicking on certain links posted on our site. Therefore, this compensation may impact how, where and in what order products appear within listing categories, except where prohibited by law for our mortgage, home equity and other home lending products. Other factors, such as our own proprietary website rules and whether a product is offered in your area or at your self-selected credit score range can also impact how and where products appear on this site. While we strive to provide a wide range offers, Bankrate does not include information about every financial or credit product or service.

Insurance Disclosure

This content is powered by HomeInsurance.com, a licensed insurance producer (NPN: 8781838) and a corporate affiliate of Bankrate.com. HomeInsurance.com LLC services are only available in states where it is licensed and insurance coverage through HomeInsurance.com may not be available in all states. All insurance products are governed by the terms in the applicable insurance policy, and all related decisions (such as approval for coverage, premiums, commissions and fees) and policy obligations are the sole responsibility of the underwriting insurer. The information on this site does not modify any insurance policy terms in any way.

Secured loans are often used by individuals needing financial resources for any reason, whether it’s to fund a business, remodel a home or pay medical bills. One asset that may be used for a secured loan is life insurance. Although there are pros and cons to this type of financial transaction, it can be an excellent way to access needed funding. Bankrate’s insurance editorial team discusses what a collateral assignment of life insurance is and when it might—or might not—be the best loan option for you.

What is collateral assignment of life insurance?

A collateral assignment of life insurance is a method of securing a loan by using a life insurance policy as collateral . If you pass away before the loan is repaid, the lender can collect the outstanding loan balance from the death benefit of your life insurance policy . Any remaining funds from the death benefit would then be disbursed to the policy’s designated beneficiary(ies).

Why use life insurance as collateral?

Collateral assignment of life insurance may be a useful option if you want to access funds without placing any of your assets, such as a car or house, at risk. If you already have a life insurance policy, it can be a simple process to assign it as collateral. You may even be able to use your policy as collateral for more than one loan, which is called cross-collateralization, if there is enough value in the policy.

Collateral assignment may also be a credible choice if your credit rating is not high, which can make it difficult to find attractive loan terms. Since your lender can rely on your policy’s death benefit to pay off the loan if necessary, they are more likely to give you favorable terms despite a low credit score.

Pros and cons of using life insurance as collateral

If you are considering collateral assignment, here are some pros and cons of this type of financial arrangement.

It may be an affordable option, especially if your life insurance premiums are less than your payments would be for an unsecured loan with a higher interest rate.
You will not need to place personal property, such as your home, as collateral, which you would need to do if you take out a secured loan. Instead, if you pass away before the loan is repaid, lenders will be paid from the policy’s death benefit. Any remaining payout goes to your named beneficiaries.
You may find lenders who are eager to work with you since life insurance is generally considered a good choice for collateral.
The amount that your beneficiaries would have received will be reduced if you pass away before the loan is paid off since the lender has first rights to death benefits.
You may not be able to successfully purchase life insurance if you are older or in poor health.
If you are using a permanent form of life insurance as collateral, there may be an impact on your ability to use the policy's cash value during the life of the loan. If the loan balance and interest payments exceed the cash value, it can erode the policy's value over time.

What types of life insurance can I use as collateral for a loan?

You may use either of the main types of life insurance— term and permanent —for collateral assignment. If you are using term life insurance, you will need a policy with a term length that is at least as long as the term of the loan. In other words, if you have 20 years to pay off the loan, the term insurance you need must have a term of at least 20 years.

Subcategories of permanent life insurance, such as whole life , universal life and variable life, may also be used. Depending on lender requirements, you may be able to use an existing policy or could purchase a new one for the loan. A permanent policy with cash value may be especially appealing to a lender, considering the added benefit of the cash reserves they could access if necessary.

How do I take out a loan using a collateral assignment of life insurance?

If you already have enough life insurance to use for collateral assignment, your next step is to find a lender who is willing to work with you. If you don’t yet have life insurance, or you don’t have enough, consider the amount of coverage you need and apply for a policy . You may need to undergo a medical exam and fill out an application .

Once your policy has been approved, ask your insurance company or agent for a collateral assignment form, which you will complete and submit with your loan application papers. The form names your lender as an assignee of the policy—meaning that they have a stake in its benefits for as long as the loan exists. You will also name beneficiaries or a single beneficiary, who will receive whatever is left over from the death benefits after the loan is repaid.

Note that you will need to stay current on your life insurance premium payments while the collateral assignment is active. This will be stated in the loan agreement, and failure to do so could have serious repercussions.

Alternatives to life insurance as collateral

If you are considering a collateral assignment of life insurance, there are a few alternative funding options that might be worth exploring. Since many factors determine each option, working with a financial advisor may be the best way to find the ideal solution for your situation.

Unsecured loan

Depending on your situation, an unsecured loan may be more affordable than a secured loan with life insurance as collateral. This is more likely to be the case if you have good enough credit to qualify for a low-interest rate without having to offer any type of collateral. There are many different types of unsecured loans, including credit cards and personal loans.

Secured loan

In addition to life insurance, there are other items you can use as collateral for a secured loan . Your home, a car or a boat, for example, could be used if you have enough equity in them. Typically, secured loans are easier to qualify for than unsecured, since they are not as risky for the lender, and you are likely to find a lower interest rate than you would with an unsecured loan. The flip side, of course, is that if you default on the loan, the lender can take the asset that you used to secure it and sell it to recoup their losses.

Life insurance loan

Some permanent life insurance policies accumulate cash value over time that you can use in different ways. If you have such a policy, you may be able to partially withdraw the cash value or take a loan against your cash value. However, there are implications to using the cash value in your life insurance policy, so be sure to discuss this solution with a life insurance agent or your financial advisor before making a decision.

Home equity line of credit (HELOC)

A home equity line of credit (HELOC) is a more flexible way to access funds than a standard secured loan. While HELOCs carry the downside of risking your home as collateral, you retain more control over the amount you borrow. Instead of receiving one lump sum, you will have access to a line of credit that you can withdraw from as needed. You will only have to pay interest on the actual amount borrowed.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best life insurance company, what type of loans are collateral assignments usually associated with, what are other common forms of collateral, what are the two types of life insurance assignments.

What is collateral insurance and how does it work?

A couple reviewing their finances and sitting in front of a laptop

What does life insurance cover?

A couple going over tax documents with a professional.

What is an irrevocable beneficiary?

A woman consulting her health specialist.

Life insurance death benefits

Life Insurance Assignment – What They Are and Why You Need Them

Everything You Need to Know about Absolute vs. Collateral Assignments

Collateral assignment, how is a collateral assignment used, how to complete a collateral assignment, releasing a collateral assignment, death and collateral assignments, collateral assignments for the uninsurable, absolute assignment, final words.

What is a collateral assignment?

A collateral assignment of life insurance gives lenders the right to collect your policy’s death benefit up to the amount of the outstanding loan balance.

A typical scenario involves taking out a business loan .

The lender may require a life insurance policy as collateral.

The type of life insurance policy used, whether a term, whole life, or universal life doesn’t matter.

The insurance policy will pay off the balance if you die while the loan is outstanding.

Life insurance for SBA loans is required when you borrow from the SBA.

The collateral assignment applies to the entire policy, including any life insurance rider benefits that may be part of the policy.

The process is similar whether you are adding the assignment to an existing policy or are buying new coverage.

There are two parties to a collateral assignment.

Assignor – Is the owner of the life insurance policy
Assignee – Is the lender

Life insurance companies have standardized forms used for this purpose.

The owner completes the form and sends it to the lender for review and signature.
Once complete, you will send the form to the insurance company.
The insurance company records the assignment and sends a confirmation to the owner and lender that the assignment is complete.

This may all seem confusing if you haven’t used an assignment before, but the reality is that most life insurers make it pretty easy to complete.

When you pay off your lender, you have the right to have the collateral assignment removed.

The life insurance companies have collateral release forms as well.

The owner completes the form and sends it to the lender.
The lender signs off on the release.
Once complete, the insurance company records the release and sends the discharge letter to all parties.

Once complete, you should re-check with the home office to ensure that your policy released the assignment.

Your agent can help with this.

How do collateral assignments work when you die?

Check out this example:

Policy Face Amount = $1,000,000
Beneficiary = Your Spouse
Original Bank Loan = $200,000
Outstanding Loan Balance at Death = $100,000

What happens next?

Your beneficiary will file the death claim with the life insurance company.
The life insurance company will review the claim and see a collateral assignment attached to your policy.
The insurer contacts the lender for an updated payoff figure.
Payoff amounts are sent directly to the lender.
Your beneficiary receives the balance of the policy death benefit .

For the above example, your lender would receive $100,000, and your beneficiary would receive the remaining $900,000 as intended.

I would like to remind you that you NEVER want to name your lender as the beneficiary, as they would receive the entire proceeds rather than just what was owed.

While lenders may want a life insurance policy as collateral, sometimes it’s difficult to obtain if the insured has substantial health issues .

If you have an existing life insurance policy in effect, it’s possible to use that for the assignment.

Another option that exists in some states is contingent coverage.

Contingent coverage is a one-year policy that you can renew.

The policy will exclude death from the known health issue but provide coverage for new health issues that develop or from accidental deaths .

Many lenders accept this coverage when it’s the only option available.

What is an absolute assignment?

You use absolute assignments when you permanently relinquish all ownership rights to your life insurance policy.

Some examples:

Life Insurance Settlements

With this transaction, you are selling your life insurance policy to a third party.

You may convert a term policy to permanent insurance before it is sold.

Another example may involve admitting seniors to a nursing home.

The nursing home may take over the policy you have.

1035 Exchange

A 1035 exchange is a tax-free transfer of cash value from universal life or whole life policy to another similar policy.

Gifting Life Insurance to Charities

You can use absolute assignments to permanently transfer your policy to your favorite charity.

Irrevocable Life Insurance Trusts (ILIT)

You use absolute assignments to permanently transfer your policy to an ILIT.

An example would be a survivorship policy you and your spouse own that you are transferring to the trust.

Many other potential issues may arise with transfers to an ILIT that are beyond the scope of this article.

Business Cases

If you purchased key person life insurance on an employee, absolute assignments are used to transfer ownership to the employee.

You may have questions about your life insurance assignment and how it works.

The following are general guidelines, as each situation is uniquely different.

Can the collateral assignment change the beneficiary?

No, the collateral assignment does not change the beneficiary.

The life insurance assignment gives the lender the right to receive proceeds equal to their outstanding loan balance.

Can a business be a beneficiary in a collateral assignment of life insurance?

A business can be the beneficiary of a life insurance policy that is collaterally assigned.

Life insurance assignments are common for absolute and collateral assignments.

What is most important is that we understand what is involved with this process.

That’s where we’ll help you make the best decision for your life insurance.

There is never any pressure or obligation with our life insurance service.

Please take a few minutes to submit your quote request today. Thank you.

About The Author

Michael Horbal

Start typing and press enter to search.

Read Our BLOG
Advisor Education
Have a Life Settlement Case?
Join Our Advisor Network
LISA Membership
Professional Representation
Life Settlement Network
Client Testimonials
PolicyTrac Secure Delivery
What Is A Viatical Settlement?
Viatical Settlement Qualifier
Sell Your Life Insurance Policy
What Is A Life Settlement?
Life Settlement Auction
Life Settlement Double Check
Life Settlement Qualifier
Life Settlement Case Studies
Life Settlement Taxation
Eligibility Requirements
What You Need To Know
John Welcom
Mark Isenman
John Basilone
Adam Sosnick
See more...
Contact Welcome Funds

Life Settlement

Educational Information

Welcome Funds has compiled every term, phrase & definition related to life settlements. Have more questions? Call us toll-free at 877.227.4484 or complete our Quick Life Settlement Qualifier to determine your eligibility.

The Life Settlement Option

WHAT IS ABSOLUTE ASSIGNMENT?

Absolute Assignment is a legal instrument that allows the owner of a life insurance policy or other valuable assets to transfer all rights and ownership of the asset to a designated assignee. This transfer of ownership is comprehensive and unrestricted, giving the assignee complete control and authority over the asset. Unlike conditional assignment, which may have specific conditions attached, absolute assignment represents an unqualified transfer of ownership..

Absolute assignment can be used not only in the context of life insurance but also for transferring ownership of other valuable assets such as real estate and securities. It involves a meticulous adherence to legal requirements and procedural details to ensure the validity and legality of the ownership transfer. Seeking guidance from legal and financial experts is essential to ensure a smooth and legally sound execution of the absolute assignment process..

When considering selling a life insurance policy, individuals have the option to engage in a life settlement, wherein the policy is sold to institutional buyers in the secondary market. This process involves applying to various licensed buyers who compete to offer the highest bid for the policy. An experienced life settlement broker can facilitate this auction-style bid process, ensuring that policy owners receive the best possible offer for their policies..

Welcome Funds is a nationally licensed life settlement broker that specializes in representing policy owners in the secondary market for life insurance. They engage in an auction bidding process to secure the highest offer from institutional buyers, providing professional representation and expert counsel throughout the sale of the life insurance policy..

To explore the eligibility of a life insurance policy for a potential life settlement, individuals can embark on a cost-free and commitment-free journey by engaging in a Life Settlement Qualification Process. This process includes a complimentary Personal Consultation & Appraisal, during which confidentiality is safeguarded. Interested individuals can complete a Quick Life Settlement Qualifier online or call a toll-free number to connect with a dedicated Client Care Advocate..

Overall, the combination of absolute assignment and the life settlement process provides individuals with a means to transfer ownership of valuable assets and explore options for selling their life insurance policies in a competitive market..

Complete our quick Life Settlement Qualifier or call us toll-free at 877.227.4484 to speak with a Client Care Advocate.

LIFE SETTLEMENT BLOG

who does a life settlement broker represent

Direct Life Settlement Buyers vs. Welcome Funds – Advisor Beware!

Posted: by John Welcom

Welcome Funds has the privilege of working with numerous financial advisors and wealth managers – and have done so for two decades – some who exclusively focus on servicing high net worth clients. One such advisor who is active in the life settlement market — and already understands the value he can create for his clients — had historically negotiated directly himself with two or three leading buyers of life insurance policies. He thought that simply engaging with mor...

Life Settlement Case Study by Welcome Funds

How to Sell Your Life Insurance Policy for $4,743,000 Instead of $275,485?

Mr. Williams purchased $10 Million in life insurance coverage in 2001 to provide his family with financial security. Over time, his financial priorities changed: his wife passed away, his children became financially independent, financial burdens arose and the estate tax exemption increased substantially.

what is the cash value of a life insurance policy

Suitability of Life Settlements

Traditionally, estate planning advisors counsel their high net worth clients to obtain life insurance policies with large death benefits. The strategy is simple: create a vehicle for heirs to receive tax-free income at the time of an insured’s passing so sufficient funds are available to pay large estate tax bills when assets are inherited.

What is the Most Suitable Exit Strategy for Life Insurance?

All eyes in the life insurance agency and the financial advisory world have been on New York, where in the summer of 2019, the New York State Supreme Court paved the way for implementation of Insurance Regulation 187. This rule imposes a new standard for agents and brokers when issuing a recommendation to a client regarding an annuity or life insurance product.

How to Get the Highest Life Settlement Offer

When you decide to sell a valuable personal asset, you usually want to obtain the highest purchase price for that property. It is sound business sense. However, how do you truly know when you have reached the point of accepting and securing the most desirable offer?

Understanding the Fair Market Value of a Life Insurance Policy

When a professional advisor identifies a life insurance policy that a client no longer needs or wishes to maintain, he should ask, as standard protocol, whether that policy may have value in the secondary market. If so, the client may be able to sell the policy in a life settlement transaction, enabling him to receive a higher cash payout than he otherwise would obtain by lapsing or surrendering the policy back to the insurance company.

The Power of a Life Settlement Auction

Professional advisors with clients who no longer need or wish to maintain a life insurance policy have options when exploring the secondary market. Many advisors prudently rely on a licensed life settlement broker to assist them in the sale of the policy and with all aspects of the transaction. However, there is still a large number of professionals persuaded to work directly with only one buyer, called a life settlement provider.

Life settlement brokers represent the policy owner in the sale of their life insurance policy

Rebuttals to the “Direct Buyer” Model for Life Settlements

Most professional advisors who explore the potential sale of an unwanted life insurance policy on behalf of their clients will rely on the assistance of a licensed life settlement broker. Life settlement brokers represent the policy owner in the transaction and have a duty to act in their best interests. Most notably, the broker’s and client’s goal is aligned: to sell the policy for the highest price possible.

Carrier Resistance To Life Settlements: Clients Need To Know They Can Sell Their Policies

Consumers who sell their life insurance policies in the life settlement market receive as much as seven times more money than they would have received by surrendering their policies back to the insurance companies. Seven times! However, an estimated 9 out of 10 policies are allowed to lapse before paying a claim, according to the Life Insurance...

The Danger of Trying to “Time the Market” for Life Settlements

Most investors in the stock market understand the danger of “market timing” — trying to choose the right day to buy a stock when the price is low and sell it when the price is high.

COMPANY INFO

Welcome Funds, Inc. 4755 Technology Way Suite 202 Boca Raton, FL 33431

Toll-Free: 877.227.4484 Phone: 561.862.0244 Fax: 561.862.0242 [email protected]

CONSUMER EDUCATION

Life Settlement Applications
Life Settlement Glossary

FINANCIAL PROFESSIONALS

IMPORTANT NOTICES

Terms of Service
Review Privacy Policy
Due Diligence
Website Security
State Regulations

TEXAS DISCLAIMER - This website is not intended for owners of a life insurance policy or a certificate holder under a group policy in the State of Texas. Texas owners and certificate holders, please click here.

LIVELYLUXELIFE

Unlocking Financial Security: The Power of Absolute Assignment in Life Insurance

the transfer of ownership rights and benefits of a life insurance policy from the policyholder to a third party. When an individual assigns their life insurance policy, they essentially sell or gift their interest in the policy to another person or entity. This can be done for various reasons, such as estate planning, debt settlement, or business purposes. The absolute assignment of a life insurance policy can offer financial flexibility and peace of mind for the policyholder, as it allows them to transfer the policy’s benefits to someone else who may benefit from it more. However, it is crucial to understand the implications and potential consequences of such an assignment, as it involves relinquishing control and rights over the policy to the assignee. This article will delve into the details of the absolute assignment of a life insurance policy, exploring its benefits, considerations, and potential drawbacks.

Transfer of ownership: Absolute assignment of a life insurance policy refers to the complete transfer of ownership rights from the policyholder to another individual or entity. This transfer is irrevocable, meaning the original policyholder no longer has any control or rights over the policy.
Beneficiary change: When a life insurance policy is absolutely assigned, the new owner also gains the right to change the beneficiary of the policy. This allows them to designate who will receive the death benefit in the event of the insured’s demise.
Creditor protection: Absolute assignment can offer protection against creditors. If the policyholder faces financial distress and has outstanding debts, assigning the life insurance policy to a third party can prevent creditors from accessing the policy’s cash value or death benefit.
Policyholder benefits: While absolute assignment transfers ownership, it does not necessarily terminate the benefits for the original policyholder. Depending on the terms of the assignment, the policyholder may still be entitled to certain benefits, such as the right to borrow against the policy’s cash value or receive dividends (if applicable). However, these benefits may be subject to the new owner’s consent or approval.
What does an absolute assignment of a life insurance policy mean?

What are the results of absolute assignment?

How does assigning an insurance policy affect it, understanding the implications of absolute assignment in life insurance policies, exploring the benefits and consequences of absolute assignment in life insurance, the power of absolute assignment: transforming life insurance policies, unlocking the potential: how absolute assignment can shape life insurance policies.

An absolute assignment of a life insurance policy refers to the legal process where the policy owner transfers all rights and ownership of the policy to a designated assignee. This transfer is all-encompassing and grants the assignee complete control and authority over the policy. Essentially, the assignee becomes the new owner with the power to make decisions regarding the policy, such as modifying beneficiaries or accessing the policy’s cash value. This instrument provides a clear and unambiguous transfer of ownership, ensuring that the assignee has full control over the life insurance policy.

An absolute assignment of a life insurance policy is a legal process where the policy owner transfers all rights and ownership to a designated assignee. This grants the assignee complete control and authority over the policy, allowing them to make decisions and access the policy’s cash value. It ensures a clear and unambiguous transfer of ownership, giving the assignee full control.

The results of absolute assignment in a life insurance policy are significant. Once the assignment is executed, the assignee has full control over the policy, including all benefits, liabilities, and rights. This means that the assignee becomes the new policy owner, with the ability to make decisions regarding the policy. Additionally, the assignee has the option to further transfer the policy to another individual if desired. Overall, absolute assignment ensures a complete shift of ownership and responsibilities in the policy.

The results of absolute assignment in a life insurance policy are transformative. The assignee gains total control over the policy, including benefits, liabilities, and rights. They become the new owner, with the power to make policy decisions and even transfer it to someone else. Absolute assignment guarantees a complete transfer of ownership and responsibilities.

Assigning an insurance policy can have significant implications for the policy itself. With an absolute assignment, the current policyholder transfers ownership to another party, who becomes the new owner and gains full legal rights. This means that all proceeds, such as surrender, maturity, and claims, will be paid directly to the assignee. This change in ownership ensures that the assignee has complete control over the policy and its benefits, potentially impacting how the policy is managed and utilized in the future.

An absolute assignment of an insurance policy can have significant consequences. The current policyholder relinquishes ownership to a new party, giving them full legal rights and control over the policy’s benefits. This transfer impacts how the policy is managed and utilized, as all proceeds will now be paid directly to the assignee.

Absolute assignment in life insurance policies refers to the transfer of ownership rights from the policyholder to another individual or entity, such as a lender or a family member. This transaction has significant implications for both parties involved. For the policyholder, absolute assignment means relinquishing control over the policy, including the ability to make changes or access the cash value. On the other hand, the assignee gains full rights and becomes the new policy owner. Understanding the implications of absolute assignment is crucial to ensure informed decision-making and to navigate the complexities of life insurance policies effectively.

Absolute assignment in life insurance policies is a significant transaction that transfers ownership rights from the policyholder to another individual or entity. This transfer relinquishes control for the policyholder while granting full rights to the assignee, emphasizing the importance of understanding the implications to make informed decisions.

Absolute assignment in life insurance is a powerful tool that allows policyholders to transfer ownership of their policies to another individual or entity. This transfer can provide numerous benefits, such as the ability to secure a loan against the policy or to gift it to a loved one. However, there are also potential consequences to consider. Once a policy is assigned, the original owner loses all control and rights to the policy, including the ability to change beneficiaries or take out loans. It is crucial for individuals to carefully weigh the advantages and drawbacks before proceeding with absolute assignment.

Absolute assignment in life insurance is a powerful tool that offers various benefits, such as securing loans or gifting policies. However, it also comes with consequences, as the original owner loses all control and rights to the policy. It is essential for individuals to carefully consider the pros and cons before proceeding with absolute assignment.

Absolute assignment is a powerful tool that allows policyholders to transfer ownership of their life insurance policies to another individual or entity. This process can have transformative effects, providing policyholders with the flexibility to change beneficiaries, secure a loan against the policy’s cash value, or even sell the policy for a lump sum payment. By utilizing absolute assignment, policyholders can unlock the true value of their life insurance policies and adapt to changing financial circumstances. It offers a level of control and financial freedom that can greatly benefit individuals and families alike.

Absolute assignment is a valuable tool that allows policyholders to transfer ownership of their life insurance policies, providing them with the flexibility to change beneficiaries, secure loans, or sell the policy. This offers control and financial freedom, benefiting individuals and families in various ways.

Absolute assignment is a powerful tool that can transform the way life insurance policies are structured. This strategy allows policyholders to transfer their rights and ownership of the policy to another party, such as a bank or a family member. By doing so, individuals can unlock the potential of their life insurance policies, leveraging them for various purposes like collateral for loans or estate planning. Absolute assignment offers flexibility and control, enabling policyholders to shape their policies to meet their specific needs and goals. This approach empowers individuals to optimize the value of their life insurance policies and maximize their financial benefits.

Absolute assignment is a versatile strategy that allows policyholders to transfer their life insurance policies to another party, providing them with flexibility and control over their policies. This enables individuals to utilize their policies as collateral for loans or for estate planning purposes, maximizing the financial benefits they can receive.

The transfer of ownership and rights of a life insurance policy from the policyholder to a third party. This process can have significant implications for both the policyholder and the assignee. By relinquishing their rights to the policy, the policyholder no longer has control over its terms and benefits. However, this can provide financial relief or serve as a strategic move for the policyholder, especially in situations such as estate planning or business transactions. On the other hand, the assignee gains the right to collect the policy’s benefits upon the insured’s death. They assume the responsibility of paying the premiums and managing the policy. In conclusion, the absolute assignment of a life insurance policy can be a valuable tool for individuals seeking financial flexibility or for businesses looking to protect their interests. It is crucial for both parties to understand the implications and carefully consider their options before proceeding with the assignment.

Relacionados

Policygenius does not allow the submission of personal information by users located within the EU or the UK. If you believe this action is in error, or have any questions, please contact us at [email protected]

Experience finance made simple on the new ABCD app!

Scan to Download the App

ABSLI Akshaya Plan
ABSLI Vision MoneyBack Plus Plan
ABSLI Vision LifeSecure Plan
ABSLI Income Assured Plan
ABSLI Jeevan Bachat Plan
ABSLI Monthly Income Plan
ABSLI Vision LifeIncome Plus Plan
ABSLI Vision Endowment Plus Plan
ABSLI Vision LifeIncome Plan
ABSLI Nishchit Laabh Plan new
ABSLI Nishchit Aayush Plan new
ABSLI Assured Savings Plan
ABSLI Assured Income Plus Plan
ABSLI Fixed Maturity Plan (Popular)
ABSLI SecurePlus Plan
ABSLI Guaranteed Milestone Plan
ABSLI Savings Plan
ABSLI Assured FlexiSavings Plan
ABSLI Salaried Term Plan new
Joint Term Life Insurance new
ABSLI DigiShield Plan
ABSLI Saral Jeevan Bima
ABSLI Anmol Suraksha Kawach
ABSLI Poorna Suraksha Kawach
ABSLI Empower Pension Plan
ABSLI Empower Pension - SP Plan
ABSLI Saral Pension
ABSLI Guaranteed Annuity Plus
ABSLI Nishchit Pension Plan
ABSLI Cancer Shield Plan
ABSLI CritiShield Plan
ABSLI Vision Star Plan
ABSLI Child's Future Assured Plan
ABSLI Fortune Wealth Plan new
ABSLI Platinum Gain Plan new
ABSLI Smart Growth Plan
ABSLI Wealth Infinia
ABSLI Wealth Assure Plus
ABSLI Wealth Max Plan
ABSLI Wealth Secure Plan
ABSLI Wealth Aspire Plan
Protection Solutions
ABSLI Group Protection Solutions
ABSLI Group Income Replacement Plan
ABSLI Pradhan Mantri Jeevan Jyoti Bima Yojana
ABSLI Group Smart Supreme plan
ABSLI Group Asset Assure Plan
ABSLI Group Bima Yojana Plan (Micro Insurance)
ABSLI Group Smart Select Plan
Retirement Solutions
ABSLI CapSecure Plan
ABSLI Capital Assured Traditional Plan
ABSLI Group Unit Linked Plan
ABSLI Group Value Plus Plan
Plans For Defence Personnel -->
SME Business Solutions -->
Term Insurance -->
Unit Linked Insurance -->
Child Insurance -->
Health Insurance -->
Retirement Insurance -->
Savings Plans -->
Life Insurance -->
Income Tax -->
Your Money -->
Group Insurance -->
Insurance Dictionary -->
ABHA ID -->
Learn About Life Insurance -->
Track My Application -->
Manage My Claim -->
Contact ABSLI -->
Individual Funds
Group Funds new -->
Read FAQs -->
Register For One ABC ID -->
Abridged Factsheets
Bonus Rates
Brochures & Specimen Contracts
Investment Factsheets
Policy Servicing Forms
Survival Benefit Forms
Read Market Outlook -->
Download Public Disclosures -->
Term Insurance
Pension Plans
Manage My Policy
PAY PREMIUM

Aditya Birla Sun Life Insurance Company Limited

SME Business Solutions

Get Guaranteed Returns After a Month ^

Unlock the Power of Smart Investment!

I agree to the Terms of Usage and Privacy Policy . By submitting my contact details here, I override my NDNC registration and authorize ABSLI to contact me by phone/e-mail/SMS/WhatsApp. Trade Logo "Aditya Birla Capital" displayed above is owned by ADITYA BIRLA MANAGEMENT CORPORATION PRIVATE LIMITED (Trademark Owner) and used by ADITYA BIRLA SUN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED (ABSLI) under the license. BEWARE OF SPURIOUS / FRAUD PHONE CALLS! IRDAI is not involved in activities like selling insurance policies, announcing bonus or investment of premiums. Public receiving such phone calls are requested to lodge a police complaint. ABSLI Nishchit Aayush is a non-linked non-participating individual savings life insurance plan (UIN No 109N137V05)

for your details.

We will reach out to you shortly.

Absolute Assignment

Share With This

To use the insurance policy as collateral for a loan, with the lender becoming the assignee .
To gift the insurance policy to someone else, making the recipient the new policy owner.
To change the policyholder due to the original policyholder's inability to maintain the policy.

How to Conduct an Absolute Assignment?

Thank you for your feedback

Newly Added Terms

Most Appreciated Terms

Guaranteed income with Lumpsum benefit

Thank you for your details. We will reach out to you shortly.

ABSLI Salaried Term Plan (UIN:109N141V01) is a non-linked non-participating individual pure risk premium life insurance plan; upon Policyholder’s selection of Plan Option 2 (Life Cover with ROP) this product shall be a non-linked non-participating individual savings life insurance plan. 1 LI Age 21, Male, Non Smoker, Option 1: Life Cover, PPT: Regular Pay, SA: ₹ 1 Cr., PT: 10 years, Premium paying term: 10 years, Annual Premium: ₹ 5900/- ( which is ₹ 491.66/month) Premium exclusive of GST. On death, 1 Cr SA is paid and the policy terminates. ADV/9/23-24/1940

Assignments In Insurance Law

Introduction

1.1 Nature Of Insurance Policies

1.2 Assignment

2. Application Of English Law

2.1 Generally

2.2 Policies Of Assurance Act 1867

2.3 Marine Insurance Act 1906

3. marine insurance, 4. property insurance, 5. motor insurance, 6. life insurance, 6.1 legal assignment, 6.2 equitable assignment, 6.3 incomplete assignment, 6.4 priorities.

7.1 Assignment Of Insurance Policies
7.2 Assignment Of The Proceeds Of Insurance Policies
7.3 Assignment Of The Subject Matter Of Insurance Policies
7.4 Assignment By Operation Of Law

7.5 Conditions Prohibiting Assignment

8. conclusion, assignments in insurance law.

The concept of assignments in insurance law takes on many forms - firstly due to the various branches of insurance law and secondly due to the various components in an insurance transaction that can be assigned. The format of this discussion, therefore, is reflective of this framework.

Assignments are first discussed in the context of the following branches of insurance law:

(i) marine insurance,

(ii) property insurance,

(iii) motor insurance, and

(iv) life insurance.

The next stage of this discussion focuses on what may be assigned in an insurance transaction and how such assignments are legally effected, namely, the assignment of:

(a) an insurance policy,

(b) the proceeds of an insurance policy, and

1.1 Nature of Insurance Policies

A. A. Tarr, Kwai-Lian Liew & W. Holligan writes:

“The origins of insurance date back thousands of years. For example, a central feature of insurance, that of risk interference, was incorporated in commercial arrangements effected by the Babylonians, Phoenicians, Greeks and Romans. However, the infancy of the modern insurance contract is founded on the practices adopted by Italian merchants in the 14th century. These merchants fostered the development of marine insurance and were reluctant to accept the numerous and diverse risks associated with the mercantile adventure of transporting goods across the sea; an early policy entered into in 1385 insured a ship and cargo against loss arising ‘from Acts of God, of the sea, of fire, of jettison, of confiscation by princes or cities or any other person, of reprisal, mishap or any other impediment’. Merchants in their relations with one another tended to uniformity on commercial matters and this tendency led to the rapid dissemination if marine insurance practices to other countries, and, in particular, to the low countries, Spain and England.” [1]

Lord Hailsham of St. Marylebone writes:

“Non-marine insurance first made its appearance in the form of life and fire insurance, but until the middle of the nineteenth century these three [2] types of insurance comprised, in practice, substantially the whole range of insurance.”

The practice of taking insurance and property and later, lives, has a long and rich history. Unsatisfied with leaving the health and safety of property and lives to the capricious whims of fate alone, our ancestors have sought to ‘hedge their bets’ by entering into an insurance transaction.

John Lowry & Philip Rawlings writes:

“The aim of insurance is to shift risk from one person (the insured) to another (the insurers): the owner of a house enters into a fire policy under which an insurer, in exchange for a premium paid by the insured, agrees to pay for damage caused to the property by fire.” [3]

Professor K. S. N. Murthy & K. V. S. Sarma writes:

“The aim of all insurance is to protect the owner from a variety of risks which he anticipates.” [4]

John Birds and Norma J. Hird observe that:

“It is suggested that a contract of insurance is any contract whereby one party assumes the risk of an uncertain event, which is not within his control, happening at a future time, in which event the other party has an interest, and under which contract the first party is bound to pay money or provide its equivalent if the uncertain event occurs.” [5]

In Rayner v Preston [6] , Brett L.J. explained the nature of a contract of insurance in the following terms:

“Now, in my judgment, the subject-matter of the contract of insurance is money, and money only. The subject-matter of insurance is a different thing from the subject-matter of the contract of insurance. The subject-matter of insurance may be a house or other premises in a fire policy, or may be a ship or goods in a marine policy. These are the subject-matter of insurance, but the subject-matter of the contract is money, and money only. The only result of the policy, if an accident which is within the insurance happens, is a payment of money. It is true that under certain circumstances in a fire policy there may be an option to spend the money in rebuilding the premises, but that does not alter the fact that the only liability of the insurance company is to pay money. The contract, therefore, is a contract with regard to the payment of money, and it is a contract made between two persons, and two persons, only, as a contact.” [7]

Poh Chu Chai writes:

“A contract of insurance constitutes a highly personal contract and as a general rule, such a contract is generally not assignable.” [8]

The insurer fixes the premium after considering the particular risks associated with the property and handling of the property in the hands of the insured. As such, as a general rule, an insurance policy is not casually assignable to another party. Nevertheless, assignments are not an unheard of option in an insurance transaction.

Before embarking on the discovery of how assignments in insurance law can be legally effected, it may prove beneficial to consider the nature of what is meant by this phrase which takes centre stage in this discussion, an ‘assignment’.

R. C. Kohli explains:

“Transfer of interest from one to another is called assignment. In insurance also when rights and obligation under the contract are transferred from one to another, the same is called assignment of the policy. There can be another assignment in insurance which is assignment of benefits under the policies. Assignment of policy and assignment of benefits are quite distinct. Whereas in the former all the rights and obligations are transferred, in the latter only benefits (i.e. money due under the policy etc) are transferred. In insurance the assignment means assignment of rights under the contract. An assignee for all purposes becomes the owner of the policy and enjoys all rights thereunder. However, by assignment no change is made in the subject matter insured by the policy and it remains unaltered.” [9]

David Norwood and John P. Weir writes:

“There is no special form of assignment document, no magic words which must be used to create a valid and effective legal assignment. As was expressed in one case [10] : ‘[An assignment] ... may be addressed to the debtor. It may be couched in the language of command, It may be a courteous request. It may assume the form of mere permission. The language is immaterial if the meaning is clear.’

The only important point is that the instrument recording the assignment must make it clear that one party with a contractual right against another party is transferring their right of enforcement of the obligations of the contract to another person.” [11]

Malcolm A. Clarke writes :

“Assignment must have been intended. Intention is ascertained by the substance rather than the form of what is said or done.” [12]

2. Application of English Law

Another introductory matter which must be considered in this discussion is the source of law in the insurance arena in Malaysia.

The governing statute in Malaysia in the field of insurance law is the Insurance Act 1996 [13] . This Act, however, does not seem to mention the issue of assigning insurance policies. As such, the provisions of the Civil Law Act 1956 [14] may be referred to in order to provide valuable guidance on the matter.

Section 3 of the Civil Law Act 1956 provides:

“Save so far as other provision has been made or may hereafter be made by any written law in force in Malaysia, the Court shall -

(a) in West Malaysia or any part thereof, apply the common law of England and the rules of equity as administered in England on the 7 th day of April, 1956;...

Provided always that the said common law, rules of equity and statutes of general application shall be applied so far only as the circumstances of the States of Malaysia and their respective inhabitants permit and subject to such qualifications as local circumstances render necessary.”

Section 5(1) of the Civil Law Act 1956 makes particular reference to life and fire insurance. This section provides that :

“In all questions or issues which arise or which have to be decided in the States of West Malaysia ... with respect to the law of ... marine insurance, average, life and fire insurance ... the law to be administered shall be the same as would be administered in England in the like case at the date of the coming into force of this Act [15] , if such question or issue had arisen or had to be decided in England, unless in any case other provision is or shall be made by any written law.”

With the aid of these provisions, English law has often been referred to for guidance in resolving legal dilemmas in the field of insurance law and since the Malaysian Act on point does not seem to have covered the matter of the assignment of insurance policies, as will be discussed below, many academicians and Malaysian judges have relied on the principles enunciated in the English courts and Parliament on this matter.

2.2 Policies of Assurance Act 1867

There is one particular dilemma highlighted by Nik Ramlah Mahmood with regard to the applicability of the Policies of Assurance Act 1867 [16] of England with regard to the legal assignment of life policies. As this author explains :

“In England, a life policy can be legally assigned in accordance with the Policies of Assurance Act 1867 which deals specifically with such assignment or in accordance with section 136 of the Law of Property Act 1925 [17] which deals with the assignment of a chose in action. [18] ...

As there is no parallel local statute, the Policies of Assurance Act 1867 (UK) is assumed to be applicable in Malaysia and is generally regarded as the only basis for legal assignment of a life policy. The validity of this assumption, however, is questionable. There is in Malaysia a provision similar to section 136 of the Law of Property Act 1925 (UK). This is section 4(3) of the Civil Law Act 1956 which provides for the absolute assignment of a chose in action. The existence of this provision can have two possible effects on the law relating to legal assignment of life policies in Malaysia.

One possible effect is that contrary to popular belief and practice, the Policies of Assurance Act 1867 (UK) is in fact inapplicable in Malaysia. According to section 5 of the Civil Law Act 1856, an English Act like the 1867 Act can only be applied if there are no local statutory provisions on the related issue. As the assignment of a life policy is in fact the assignment of a chose in action and there is a local provision on this, there seems to be no valid justification for applying the Policies of Assurance Act 1867 in Malaysia.

The other possible effect is that there are, in Malaysia as in England, two different statutory provisions relating to the assignment of life policies, one under the Policies of Assurance Act 1867 (UK) and the other under the Civil Law Act 1956. As the Civil Law Act provision deals with the assignment of a chose in action generally, its existence should not prevent the application of an English statute which deals specifically with the assignment of life policies.

While a finding by a Malaysian court in favour of the first possible interpretation may alarm those in the insurance industry who have always regarded the Policies of Assurance Act 1867 of England to be the sole basis for the legal assignment of a life policy, such a finding may in the long term bring the practices of the industry in Malaysia in line with those in England where such assignments are now more commonly done under the Law of Property Act than under the Policies of Assurance Act.” [19]

There is no statute in Malaysia that deals exclusively with the area of marine insurance. As such, as Salleh Abas C.J. clarified in The “Melanie” United Oriental Assurance Sdn. Bhd. Kuantan v. W.M. Mazzarol [20] :

“... we must refer to ... the Marine Insurance Act 1906 of the United Kingdom. This Act is made applicable to Malaysia as part of our law by virtue of section 5(1) [21] of our Civil Law Act 1956.” [22]

The Marine Insurance Act 1906 [23] contains a few sections dealing with the concept of assignment in marine insurance. Section 50 of this Act states :

“(1) A marine policy is assignable unless it contains terms expressly prohibiting assignment. It may be assigned either before or after loss.

(2) Where a marine policy has been assigned so as to pass the beneficial interest in such policy, the assignee of the policy is entitled to sue thereon in his own name; and the defendant is entitled to make any defence arising out of the contract which he would have been entitled to make if the action had been brought in the name of the person by or on behalf of whom the policy was effected.

(3) A marine policy may be assigned by indorsement thereon or in other customary manner.” [24]

Section 51 of this Act reads :

“Where the assured has parted with or lost his interest in the subject-matter insured, and has not, before or at the time of so doing, expressly or impliedly agreed to assign the policy, any subsequent assignment of the policy is inoperative.

Provided that nothing in this section affects the assignment of a policy after loss.” [25]

In Colinvaux’s Law of Insurance , section 51 of this Act is explained as having the effect such that :

“This rule is an obvious corollary of insurable interest: if the assignor loses insurable interest, the policy lapses and there is thus nothing to assign. In the converse case, where the assured assigns the policy without assigning the subject-matter, the assignee has no insurable interest and is thus unable to sue on the policy.” [26]

Section 15 of this Act provides :

“Where the assured assigns or otherwise parts with his interest in the subject-matter insured, he does not thereby transfer to the assignee his rights under the contract of insurance, unless there can be an express or implied agreement with the assignee to that effect.

But the provisions of this section do not affect a transmission of interest by operation of law.” [27]

In the book, Macgillivray & Parkington on Insurance Law - relating to all risks other than marine [28] , the position when the subject-matter insured is assigned is summarised as :

“If the assured voluntarily parts with all his interest in the subject-matter of the insurance policy, the policy lapses since the assured no longer has any insurable interest and can have suffered no loss [29] . The assignment must, however, be complete [30] and if the assured retains any insurable interest he will be able to recover under the policy; thus, if he enters into a contract to convey the subject-matter and the subject-matter is lost or damaged, the assured can still recover even though the risk has passed to the purchaser [31] ; until the vendor is paid he cannot be certain of receiving the purchase price and it is in effect this risk which, in such a case, is the subject of insurance. [32] The policy will probably remain in force ever after conveyance if the purchase price has not been paid, provided that the vendor has not parted with his lien. The lien will ensure that the assured still has an insurable interest. [33] An assured who enters into a contract of sale will often agree to transfer the insurance policy and, if he effectively does so, the transferee will be able to recover under it.”

Digby C. Jess writes:

“Property and liability insurances are personal contracts, and do not run with the property if it is sold or otherwise disposed of or with a transfer of liabilities of the insured. Therefore, both at common law and equity, as assignment of a policy of insurance can only be valid of the insurer consents to this course, whereby, in truth a new contract of insurance is effected between the assignee and the insurer, and that between the assignor (the original insured) and the insurer lapses.” [34]

In The North of England Pure Oil-Cake Company v The Archangel Maritime Insurance Company, [35] a firm insured a cargo of linseed to be transported by sea. The policy was to cover every stage of the voyage as if each stage of the voyage were separately insured and the policy of insurance was expressed to be for the benefit of the firm and the assignees. During the voyage, the firm sold the cargo. Part of the cargo was sunk due to perils within the terms of the policy. Later, the firm assigned the policy to the purchasers of the linseed.

Cockburn C.J. in this case held :

“We are agreed on one point, which entitles the defendants to judgment, viz. that, the policy not having been assigned until after the interest of the assignors had ceased, an effective assignment was impossible.” [36]

In Sadler’s Company and Badcock, [37] a lessee of a house insured the house from fire. After the lessee’s lease expired but while the insurance policy was still in effect, the house burnt down. Following the destruction of the house, the lessee assigned the policy to the landlords. The landlords then attempted to claim the benefit of the policy from the insurance company.

The Lord Chancellor in this case decided that a policyholder could not assign a policy at a point in time when the policyholder does not have any interest in the insured property. The lessee in this case was not able to assign the policy since at the time the lessee purported to assign the policy the lessee had no longer any interest in the house. In the words of the judge :

“And I am of opinion that the party insured ought to have a property in the thing insured at the time of the insurance made, and at the time of the loss by fire, or he cannot be relieved. Mrs. Strode [the lessee] had no property at the time of the fire, consequently no loss to her; and if she had no interest, nothing could pass to the plaintiffs [landlords] by assignment. ...

If the insured was not to have a property at the time of the insurance or loss, any one might insure another’s house, which might have a bad tendency to burning houses. Insuring the thing from damage is not the meaning of the policy, it must mean insuring Mrs. Strode from damage, and she has suffered none.” [38]

In The Ecclesiastical Commissioners for England v The Royal Exchange Assurance Corporation, [39] one ecclesiastical body sold a farm that was covered by a fire insurance policy to another ecclesiastical body. At the time of the sale, no mention was made about the assignment of the policy. After the sale, the farm burnt down and the purchaser seeks to claim on the policy.

The insurance company argues that there was no valid assignment of the policy and as such, the insurance company is not liable to the seller since the seller had no interest in the insured property and thus have no insurable interest at the time of the accident nor the purchaser since the policy has not been validly assigned to the purchaser. Charles J. in this case agreed with the arguments of the insurance company and held:

“The whole transaction was complete. Can anybody sue? The Commissioners [seller] cannot sue because there has been no assignment of the policy to them. ... In this case the vendors have conveyed away their property and received their consideration ... I must therefore give judgment for the defendants [insurance company], with costs.” [40]

In Collinridge v The Royal Exchange Assurance Corporation, [41] a company which owned a number of buildings insured the same against fire. These buildings were indeed destroyed by fire. However, before the fire took place, these buildings were in the process of being acquired by the Metropolitan Board of Works. There was no mention of an accompanying assignment of the fire insurance policy. The Board had yet to make payments for the conveyance. The insurance company disputes liability.

Mellor J. in this case held:

“It appears that the plaintiff at the time of the fire was in the position of unpaid vendor, and had possession of his premises. Under these circumstances, I think there is nothing to prevent him from bringing an action to recover the amount which he has insured.” [42]

Lush J. in this case concurred :

“The plaintiff is in the position of a person who has entered into a contract to sell his property to another. ... The contract will no doubt be completed, but legally the buildings are still his property. The defendants [insurance company] by their policy undertook to make good any loss or damage to the property by fire. There is nothing to shew that any collateral dealings with the premises, such as those stated in this case, are to limit his liability. If the plaintiff had actually conveyed them away before the fire, that would have been a defence to the action, for he would have then have had no interest at the time of the loss. But in the present case he still has a right to the possession of his property, and the defendants are bound to pay him the insurance money ...” [43]

In Rayner v Preston, [44] a set of buildings covered by a fire insurance policy were contracted to be sold. After the date the contract was signed but before the contract was completed, the buildings were damaged by fire. The contract contained no mention of the fire insurance policy. The insurance company made payments to the seller of the buildings. The purchaser seeks to claim this money or to compel the seller to apply the money received towards making repairs to the buildings.

The first argument proposed by the purchaser was that although the contract made no specific mention of the insurance policy, the contract gave the purchaser a right to all contracts related to the buildings. Cotton L.J. in this case was not in support of this contention and held :

“The contact passes all things belonging to the vendors appurtenant to or necessarily connected with the use and enjoyment of the property mentioned in the contract, but not, in my opinion, collateral contracts; and such, in my opinion, ... the policy of insurance is. It is not a contract limiting or affecting the interest of the vendors in the property sold, of affecting their right to enforce the contract of sale, for it is conceded that, if there were no insurance and the buildings sold were burnt, the contract for sale would be enforced. It is not even a contract in the event of a fire to repair the buildings, but a contract in that event to pay the vendors a sum of money which, if received by them, they may apply in any way they think fit. It is a contract, not to repair the damage to the buildings, but to pay a sum not exceeding the sum insured or the money value of the injury. In my opinion, the contract of insurance is not of such a nature as to pass without apt words under a contract for sale of the thing insured.” [45]

The next argument proposed by the purchaser was that between the time of the contract being made and the conveyance being completed, the seller was a trustee of the property for the purchaser and as such, the seller is a trustee for the purchaser with regard to the money received for the property during this period of trusteeship. This argument did not find favour with the court either and Cotton L.J. held:

“An unpaid vendor is a trustee in a qualified sense only, and is so only because he has made a contact which a Court of Equity will give effect to by transferring the property sold to the purchaser, and so far as he is a trustee he is so only in respect of the property contracted to be sold. Of this the policy is not a part. A vendor is in no way a trustee for the purchaser of rents accruing before the time fixed for completion, and here the fire occurred and the right to recover the money accrued before the day fixed for completion. The argument that the money is received in respect of the property which is trust property is, in my opinion, fallacious.” [46]

Brett L.J. in this case concurred :

“... I venture to say that I doubt whether it is a true description of the relation between the parties to say that from the time of the making of the contract, or at any time, one is ever trustee for the other. They are only parties to a contract of sale and purchase of which a Court of Equity will under certain circumstances decree a specific performance. But even if the vendor was a trustee for the vendee, it does not seem to me at all to follow that anything under the contract of insurance would pass. As I have said, the contract of insurance is a mere personal contact for the payment of money. It is not a contract which runs with the land. If it were, there ought to be a decree that upon completion of the purchaser the policy be handed over. But that is not the law. The contract of insurance does not run with the land; it is a mere personal contract, and unless it is assigned no suit or action can be maintained upon it except between the original parties to it... [47]

“I therefore, with deference, think that the Plaintiffs here [purchaser] cannot recover from the Defendant [seller], on the ground that there was no relation of any kind or sort between the Plaintiff and the Defendant with regard to the policy, and therefore none with regard to any money received under the policy.” [48]

James L.J. in this case gave a dissenting judgment on this point and held that :

“... the relation between the vendor and the purchaser became, and was in law, as from the date of the contract and up to the completion of it, the relation of trustee and cestui que trust , and that the trustee received the insurance money by reason of and as the actual amount of the damage done to the trust property.” [49]

In Castellain v Preston and Others, [50] the defendants owned a piece of land and buildings which were covered by a fire insurance policy. The defendants entered into negotiations to sell the premises to their tenants. In the midst of these negotiations, a fire broke out which damaged a part of the buildings. By the time of the fire the contract of sale was signed, a deposit was paid but the contract was not completely performed as yet. The insurance company made payments to the defendants on the insurance policy for the fire. The tenants paid the full purchase price and proceeded with the slae despite the fire. The insurance company brings the present action.

Brett L.J. commented on the foundation of insurance law :

“The very foundation, in my opinion, of every rule which has been applied to insurance law is this, namely, that the contract of insurance contained in a marine or fire policy is a contract of indemnity, and of indemnity only, and that this contract means that the assured, in case of a loss against which the policy has been made, shall be fully indemnified, but shall never be more than fully indemnified. That is the fundamental principle of insurance, and if ever a proposition is brought forward which is at variance with it, that is to say, which either will prevent the assured from obtaining a full indemnity, or which will give to the assured more than a full indemnity, that proposition must certainly be wrong.” [51]

Cotton L.J. added :

“The policy is really a contract to indemnify the person insured for the loss which he has sustained in consequence of the peril insured against which has happened, and from that it follows, of course, that as it is only a contract of indemnity, it is only to pay that loss which the assured may have sustained by reason of the fire which has occurred. In order to ascertain what that loss is, everything must be taken into account which is received by and comes to the hand of the assured, and which diminishes the loss. It is only the amount of the loss, when it is considered as a contract of indemnity, which is to be paid after taking into account and estimating those benefits or sums of money which the assured may have received in diminution of the loss... [52]

Therefore the conclusion at which I have arrived is, that if the purchase-money has been paid in full, the insurance office will get back that which they have paid, on the ground that the subsequent payment of the price which had been before agreed upon, and the contract for payment of which was existing at the time, must be brought into account by the assured, because it diminishes the loss against which the insurance office merely undertook to indemnify them [53] .”

Mahinder Singh Sidhu observes :

“An assignment of the policy means a ‘change of interest’ i.e., somebody else is substituted for the original insured in the motor insurance contract. All motor policies can be validly assigned but the insurer’s prior consent is essential.” [54]

Mahinder Singh Sidhu also writes :

“A motor insurance contract is always personal in the sense that some human element is inevitably involved, and in a technical sense, the insurer’s decision to enter on the contract depends on the personal qualities of the insured and the insurer’s confidence in him. The insurers have the right to question and investigate the proposed insured and vary the terms of the contract. If an assignment takes place it is termed as a “novation”, since the assignment virtually creates a new contract with the assignee.

A valid assignment gives the assignee the right to sue and gives the insurance company a good legal discharge without the necessity of joining the assignor. Where there is a conditional sale of a car to the new purchaser, the ownership of the car still remains with the insured, and does not amount to any transfer of his insurable interest. But where there has been a complete sale and transfer of the vehicle and handing over of the policy documents to the purchaser, it does not create a valid assignment, though there is a transfer of interest of the subject matter of the insurance. The transfer of the insurable interest causes the policy to lapse, and the purchaser has no insurance cover if he drives the car and meets with an accident.” [55]

In Peters v General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corporation Ltd. [56] , the owner of a motor van sold the vehicle to another person and purportedly assigned the motor insurance policy for the van to the purchaser. After the sale, the purchaser was involved in an accident and attempted to make a claim to the insurance company based on the motor insurance policy purportedly assigned. The insurance company disputed the purchaser’s right to claim under the insurance policy issued to the seller of the van.

Sir Wilfred Greene M.R. in this case decided that:

“Assuming in his favour that there was an intention to assign the policy, the fundamental remains : Is this policy one which is capable of assignment? The judge held that it was not, and I am in entire agreement with that.” [57]

The effect of the motor insurance policy was that the insurance company undertook to indemnify the policyholder in the case of an accident while the car was driven by the policyholder or anyone else driving the vehicle with the policyholder’s consent or permission.

Sir Wilfred Greene M.R. explained the effect of deciding that such a policy was assignable:

“It appears to me as plain as anything can be that a contract of this kind is in its very nature not assignable. The effect of the assignment, if it were possible to assign, was ... that, from and after the assignment, the name of Mr. Pope, the assignee [the purchaser], would have taken the place of that of Mr. Coomber [the seller] in the policy, and the policy would have to be read as though Mr. Pope’s name were mentioned instead of Mr. Coomber’s. In other words, the effect of the assignment would be to impose upon the insurance company an obligation to indemnify a new assured, or persons ordered or permitted to drive by that new assured. That appears to be altering in toto the character of the risk under a policy of this kind. The risk that A.B. is going to incur liability by driving his motor car, or that persons authorised by A.B. are going to cause injury by driving his motor car, is one thing. The risk that C.D. will incur liability by driving a motor car, or that persons authorised by C.D. will incur liability through driving a motor car, is, or may be, a totally different thing.” [58]

One reason given by Sir Wilfred Greene M.R. for deciding that an insurance policy of this kind was not capable of assignment was that :

“The insurance company in this case, as in every case, make inquiries as to the driving record of the person proposing to take out a policy of insurance with them. The business reasons for that are obvious, because a man with a good record will be received at an ordinary rate of premium and a man with a bad record may not be received at all, or may be asked to pay a higher premium. The policy is, in a very true sense, one in which there is inherent a personal element of such a character as to make it, in my opinion, quite impossible to say that the policy is one assignable at the volition of the assured.” [59]

The second reason given by the judge as the basis of his judgement was that the according to the Road Traffic Act 1930 [60] in the United Kingdom, it is unlawful for anyone to use a motor vehicle or permit anyone else to use the motor vehicle unless that user or other person permitted by the user is covered by a motor insurance policy for the use of the motor vehicle. [61] Additionally under the statute, if a judgment is obtained in respect of a liability covered by the policy against any person insured by the policy, then the insurance company is generally liable to make the required payment to the person who has the benefit of the judgment. [62]

The purchaser of the car in this case argued that he was driving the car with the permission of the policyholder [63] and as such, should receive the same benefit of coverage in terms of the insurance policy. Based on this rationale, the purchaser argued that since judgment was obtained against him in respect of the accident and since he was covered by the policy, the insurance company should be liable under the judgment and make payments to the party who obtained the judgment. The court, however, held that :

“At the date when the accident took place, the entire property in this car was vested in Pope [the purchaser]. He had bought the car. On the sale of the car, the property passed to him ... The property, therefore, passed to the purchaser long before this accident took place. The circumstance that he had not paid the whole of the purchase price is irrelevant for that purpose, because that circumstance does not leave in the vendor, Mr. Coomber, any interest in the car. There is no vendor’s lien, or anything of that sort. The car had become the out-and-out property of Pope. When Pope was using that car, he was not using it by the permission of Coomber [the seller]. It is an entire misuse of language to say that. He was using it as owner, and by virtue of his rights as owner, and not by virtue of any permission of Coomber.” [64]

In Smith v Ralph, [65] the scenario was basically the same as above, namely, that the purchaser of a motor vehicle again tried to claim the coverage of the insurance policy issued to the seller of the motor vehicle on the basis that the purchaser was driving the motor vehicle with the permission or consent of the policyholder.

Lord Parker of Waddington C.J. in this case similarly held that the purchaser was not covered by the policy as the policyholder could not assign any rights in the policy when he no longer had any interest in the vehicle covered by the policy. In the words of the judge :

“Any permission or authority given by the policyholder ... could not extend beyond the time when he ceased to be a policyholder in the sense of having any insurable interest.” [66]

In Nanyang Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Salbiah & Anor, [67] a car was bought on behalf of a company. The company then entered into negotiations to sell the car to the purchaser. The terms of the proposed sale in the written contract included the obligation of the purchaser to make an initial payment and thereafter to continue paying for the car in instalments. The parties varied this term by oral agreement when the purchaser did not make this initial payment in full by allowing him to make this initial payment in instalments. The car was involved in an accident and judgment was obtained against the driver of the car who was the purchaser. The insurance company disputed liability for the claim against them to honour the judgment obtained as they argued that the seller of the car no longer had any insured interest with the proposed sale of the car and as such, the insurance policy has lapsed.

Azmi C.J. in this case held:

“It is therefore quite clear in my view from the evidence, that the company intended to retain the property in the car until Abdul Karim [the purchaser] has paid in full the initial payment of $1,000 under the D.6 [the contract] when he could execute a hire-purchase agreement with a financial company. ...

For the above reason, I would therefore with respect, agree with the finding of the trial judge that the appellants [seller] had an insurable interest in the car on the date of the accident and the car was being driven by Abdul Karim with the permission of the insured.” [68]

In People’s Insurance Co. of Malaya Ltd. v Ho Ah Kum & Anor, [69] the driver of a van was sued by the estate of a deceased who was killed in an accident due to the negligent driving of this driver. The estate of the deceased obtained judgment against the driver of the van. The driver, it was alleged, was driving the van with the permission of the owner of the van who had an insurance policy on the van. The question that arose in this case was whether the driver was so driving with the permission of the owner or whether the owner of the van had sold the van to the driver and as such parted with possession of the van before the date of the accident.

The driver was actually an employee of the owner of the van who at the time of the accident was using returning from a delivery made on behalf of the employer in the course of his employment. The evidence showed that the owner told the driver that the ownership of the van would not be transferred unless and until the driver made full payment of the purchase price. The owner was aware that the reason the driver bought the van was to use the van in making these deliveries.

Wee Chong Jin C.J. in this case held on the facts that:

“In any event, having regard to the relationship between Foo [driver] and Yeo [owner] throughout the material times; to the purpose for which Foo agreed to purchase from Yeo the motor van; and most important of all to the uncontradicted evidence of Foo that when the accident occurred he was returning after delivering Yeo’s flour and there being no evidence to the contrary, I take the view that there is sufficient evidence on the record for me to find and I do find that at the time of the accident Foo was driving the van on the order of the insured.” [70]

In Tattersall v. Drysdale, [71] the driver of a car was involved in an accident and judgment was obtained against him. The driver had an insurance policy with the London & Edinburgh Insurance Company for a Standard Swallow Saloon car. This Standard car was sold to a company who was in turn selling the driver a Riley Saloon car belonging to the director of this company which was under a Lloyd’s Eclipse insurance Policy. The driver was in the process of having his insurance company, the London & Edinburgh Insurance Company, cover the Riley car and no longer cover the Standard car. However, this change was not made before the accident as yet. The question that arose was which insurance company was liable for the accident.

Goddard J. in this case held :

“As to the question of permission, I am clearly of opinion that he was driving with Gilling’s [the director of the company the Riley car was bought from] permission. ... The truth is that no bargain about insurance was ever made. Gilling, on handing over his car after the bargain had been made, wished the plaintiff [driver] to insure it and he was willing to do so, but he was allowed to drive it as he wished ...” [72]

Both insurance policies contained a clause that coverage is extended to indemnify a person driving the insured car with the assured’s permission provided that the driver is not entitled to indemnity under any other insurance policy. The next question that arose, as such, was whether the Riley car was covered by the insurance policy of the driver. The judge held that it did not. This insurance policy was stated to cover the Standard car which had been sold. The Riley car was not entered on this policy. The coverage was extended to the situation when the assured drove another car temporarily but it is the car stated in the policy which is the subject of the insurance. As such, this insurance policy in the name of the driver lapsed when the car the insurance policy was stated to cover, namely the Standard car, was sold.

The driver held to be driving the Riley car with the permission of the assured, namely the director of the company who owned this car with an insurance policy, the judge went on to direct that the insurance company of the director, namely, the Lloyd’s Eclipse insurance Policy, through the extension clause discussed above, covered the driver of the Riley car and as such, was liable on the judgment obtained for the accident.

In Roslan bin Abdullah v. New Zealand Insurance Co. Ltd, [73] there was a collision between 2 trucks. Judgment was obtained and the appellant then sought to claim against the insurance company who had issued an insurance policy on the respondent’s truck. The insurance company disputed liability as the judgment obtained was not entered against the assured as the assured was the previous owner of the truck and not the current owner, the respondent company.

Wan Suleiman F.J. [74] in this case, with regard to whether there was any assignment or novation of the insurance policy from the previous owner to the new owner, affirmed the following principles from the judgment of Goddard J. in Peters v General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corporation Ltd. [75]

Goddard J. (as he then was) held:

(a) when the vendor sold the car, the insurance policy automatically lapsed.

(b) at the time of the accident, the purchaser could not be said to be driving the car by the order or with the permission of the vendor, as the car was then the purchaser’s property.

(c) the insured is not entitled to assign his policy to a third party. An insurance policy is a contract of personal indemnity, and the insurer cannot be compelled to accept responsibility in respect of a third party who may be quite unknown to them.” [76]

Wan Suleiman F.J., with regard to whether the driver, as an employee of the current owner of the truck was driving with the permission of the previous owner of the truck, held :

“We are informed by counsel for the appellant that Wee & Wee Realty Sdn. Bhd. [the previous owner of the truck] and United Malaysia Co. Ltd. [the current owner of the truck] the second defendant in C.S. K.124/76 are sister companies. Be that as it may they are distinct entities. The respondents were no longer the owners of the truck and therefore there cannot be any question of them ordering or permitting the first defendant [employee of the current owner of the truck] in C.S. K.124/76 to drive it.” [77]

S. Santhana Dass writes :

“Life insurance seeks to reduce the financial uncertainties arising from the natural contingencies in old age and death and to ease the burden in the case of possible misfortunes - injury and sickness. The principal function of life insurance business is to furnish protection against the financial needs which may be caused by disability and death. It provides food, shelter and clothing, when illness, injury or death cuts off the income of the breadwinner.” [78]

In the book, Colinvaux’s Law of Insurance , it is written:

“Life policies are to be considered something more than a contract. They are treated as securities for money payable at an uncertain but future date which is bound to occur.” [79]

Robert J. Surridge, Sara Forrest, Noleen Dignan, Alison Broadberry & Duncan Backus writes :

“A practical definition might be that a life assurance contract is one whereby one party (the insurer) undertakes for a consideration (the premium) to pay money (the sum assured) to or for the benefit of the other party (the assured) upon the happening of a specified event, where the object of the assured is to provide a sum for himself or others at some future date, or for others in the event of his death.” [80]

Robert J. Surridge, Sara Forrest, Noleen Dignan, Alison Broadberry & Duncan Backus also write with regard to the assignment of life policies that :

“An assignment of a life policy is a document or action which is effective to transfer the ownership of the policy from one person to another. Assignments may be made for a variety of reasons, including:

- Sale of exchange;

- Gift or voluntary transfer;

- Settlement, transferring the policy to trustees to give effect to successive or contingent interests;

- Transfer to existing trustees of a settlement or to beneficiaries in pursuance of the trusts;

- Mortgage; transfer of mortgage; or reassignment on repayment;or

- Assignment to a trustee for the benefit of creditors.” [81]

Nik Ramlah Mahmood writes:

“In relation to life insurance, an assignment means the transfer of one’s interest in the policy to another. Such an assignment commonly happens when an insured under an own life policy uses the policy, which is a valuable piece of property, as security for a loan and assigns it to the creditor. This usually takes the form of a conditional assignment whereby the policy would be reassigned to the insured once he has paid all his debts. Banks and other credit-giving institutions which lend huge sums of money to individuals normally insist that the borrower takes out a policy on his life and assigns it to them as security for the loan.

A life policy can also be unconditionally or absolutely assigned either as a gift or under a contract of sale. Such an assignment is absolute and does not leave any residual rights with the assignor.” [82]

In Dalby v. The India and London Life-Assurance Company, [83] the Anchor Life-Assurance Company insured the life of his late Royal Highness, the Duke of Cambridge. This policy was effected by Wright on behalf of the company.

Parke B. stated in this case:

“The contract commonly called life-assurance, when properly considered, is a mere contract to pay a certain sum of money on the death of a person, in consideration of the due payment of a certain annuity for his life, - the amount of the annuity being calculated, in the first instance, according to the probable duration of the life; and when once fixed, it is constant and invariable. The stipulated amount of annuity is to be uniformly paid on one side, and the sum to be paid in the event of death is always (except when bonuses have been given by prosperous offices) the same, on the other. This species of insurance in no way resembles a contract of indemnity.

Policies of assurance against fire ands against marine risks, are both properly contracts of indemnity, - the insurer engaging to make good, within certain limited amounts, the losses sustained by the assured in their buildings, ships, and effects... [84]

... a contract of indemnity only. But that is not of the nature of what is termed an assurance for life; it really is what it is on the fact of it, - a contract to pay a certain sum in the event of death [85] .”

S. Santhana Dass points out that:

“An assignee under a life insurance contract can re-assign the policy to the original owner.” [86]

The Policies of Assurance Act 1867 [87] defines a life insurance policy as “... ‘any instrument by which the payment of moneys, by or out of the funds of an assurance company, on the happening of any contingency depending on the duration of human life, is assured or secured’. [88] ”

The Policies of Assurance Act 1867 provides that an assignee can sue in his own name if [89] :

(i) the assignee has the right in equity to receive and the right to give a valid discharge to the assurance company for the policy money, that is, it was a precondition that the assignee be beneficially entitled to the policy money or entitled to receive the policy money as a trustee or mortgagee at the time of the claim;

(ii) the assignee has obtained an assignment, either by endorsement on the policy or by separate instrument, in the words or to the effect set forth in the Schedule to this Act; and

(iii) written notice of the assignment had been given to the insurance company.

Cotton L.J. in the case In re Turcan [90] commented :

“Before the Act of 1867 [91] (30 & 31 Vict. C. 144) a policy could not be assigned at law, but now it can ...” [92]

Section 4(3) of the Civil Law Act 1956 [93] states :

“Any absolute assignment, by writing, under the hand of the assignor, not purporting to be by way of charge only, of any debt or other legal chose in action, of which express notice in writing has been given to the debtor, trustee or other person from whom the assignor would have been entitled to receive or claim the debt or chose in action, shall be, and be deemed to have been, effectual in law, subject to all equities which would have been entitled to priority over the right of the assignee under the law as it existed in the State before the date of the coming into force of this Act [94] , to pass and transfer the legal right to the debt or chose in action, from the date of the notice, and all legal and other remedies for the same, and the power to give a good discharge for the same, without the concurrence of the assignor.”

S. Santhana Dass has summarised the requirements under section 4(3) of the Civil Law Act 1956 in order to effect a legal assignment of a life insurance policy as follows :

“The requirements for an absolute assignment of a life policy are as follows:-

(a) the assignment must be in writing and signed by the assignor (the insured);

(b) it must be absolute and not by way of charge only; and

S. Santhana Dass goes on to explain:

“The common practice amongst insurers with respect to assignments (be it under the Section 4(3) of the Civil Law Act 1956 or the Policies of Assurance Act 1867 (U.K.) can be summarised as follows:-

(i) An assignment should be in writing and a life policy can be assigned absolutely or conditionally.

(ii) The written notice of assignment must be sent to the Head Office or the Principal Office of the insurer.

(iii) Upon receipt of the assignment notice the insurer registers each notice.

(iv) If there is no written notice given to the insurer and the insurer has made payment to a person other than the assignee, the insurers shall not be liable to the assignee thereafter. The assignee cannot sue the insurer for recovery of any benefit under the policy unless a notice of assignment has been sent to the insurer.

(v) An assignment can be done by effecting an endorsement and attaching it to the back of the policy. Otherwise it is effected by a separate deed signed by all parties concerned i.e. the assignor, assignee and the insurer.

(vi) If there is more than one assignment, the priority of claims by the assignor will depend upon the priority in the date of receipt of the notice by the insurer. Thus position has now been altered by Section 168(2) of the Insurance Act 1996 where priority is based on the date of the assignment rather than date of the notice.” [96]

Robert J. Surridge, Sara Forrest, Noleen Dignan, Alison Broadberry & Duncan Backus writes:

“Where there has not been a legal assignment but the assignee has given consideration , equity will (subject to the riles on priority) assist him to perfect his title against third parties, even though he may not have obtained formal assignment.

If, however, a voluntary assignee seeks the support of equity, he will succeed only where:

(1) the assignment is complete between assignor and assignee, ie everything necessary has been done to make a present transfer and render the assignment binding; or

(2) the assignor has constituted himself as trustee for the assignee.” [97]

Roy Hodgin writes :

“Assignment can be made in equity ... commonly, under the Policies of Assurance Act 1867, which requires that notice of such assignment be given in writing to the insurer. Under the 1867 Act, the assignment may be made either by an endorsement on the policy or by a separate document using the wording set out in the Schedule to the Act.” [98]

Cohen L.J. in Inland Revenue Commissioners v. Electric and Musical Industries, Ltd. [99] explained :

“It is quite true that as a matter of law there is no special form required to constitute an equitable assignment. Whether or not what has been done in any particular transaction amounts to an equitable assignment is a matter of inference from the facts and documents concerned ...” [100]

“There is no specific method of effecting an equitable assignment of a life policy. The only important requirement is that there must be a clear indication that the object of the transaction is to transfer the benefits in the policy from one party to another. No written document is necessary. A common way of effecting an equitable assignment is by the assignor depositing the policy of insurance with the assignee. An equitable assignee cannot enforce his rights directly against the insurer in his own name, he must either compel the assignor to sue on his behalf or sue the assignor and join the insurer to the action. The equitable assignee is thus not in a position to give a legal disharge to the insurer.” [101]

Tan Lee Meng writes:

“For the assignor to claim under the policy, the assignment must be complete.” [102]

In the case In re Williams [103] , an owner of an insurance policy paid the insurance premiums until his death. The court had to construe a purported assignment of the policy to his housekeeper through the following signed endorsement:

“’I authorise Ada Maud Ball, my housekeeper and no other person to draw this insurance in the event of my predeceasing her this being my sole desire and intention at time of taking this policy out and this is my signature.’” [104]

Lord Cozens-Hardy M.R. held:

“According to my construction it is not an assignment at all. The question whether in the circumstances there is a voluntary gift always involves the consideration not whether the donor might have given the property, but what is the form in which he has purported to give it. Take the case of shares in a limited company which are only transferable by deed, or the case of Consols which are only transferable at the Bank of England; it is quite clear that a mere letter not under seal in either of these cases purporting to assign the property would not have been complete, the donor would not have done all he could to perfect it, and the intended gift would have failed. Of course if there had been valuable consideration for the assignment the position would have been different.” [105]

Warrington L.J. in this case agreed:

“The assignee in the present case is a volunteer, and she claims to have received in the assignor’s lifetime the gift of a certain chose in action, namely, a policy of insurance, the amount secured by which is in its nature only to be paid on the death of the assured. It is a policy on the assignor’s own life. Claiming as she does as a volunteer and alleging that the assignor made this gift to her, she can only succeed if she can show that the assignor did everything which according to the nature of the property comprised in the assignment was necessary to be done in order to transfer the property and render the assignment binding upon him. ...

The question turns largely if not entirely on the construction of the document. Of course the mere form of words is immaterial if the assignor has used any form of words which expressed a final and settled intention to transfer the property to the assignee there and then. That would be sufficient. He need not use the word “give” or “assign” or any particular words.” [106]

Warrington L.J. construed the words of the endorsement and came to the conclusion that it merely created a revocable authority to receive the policy money after the assignor’s death which was a nullity as the authority would be revoked by the assignor’s death [107] . Lord Cozens-Hardy M.R. similarly construed the endorsement as either a mere: [108]

• power of attorney, though not under seal, authorising the person named to receive the money which power becomes inoperative on the death of the person conferring it; or

• mandate which ceased to be operative at death.

In Newman v. Newman, [109] section 3 of the Policies of Assurance Act 1867 was construed. This section states:

“No assignment made after the passing of this Act of a policy of life assurance shall confer on the assignee therein named, his executors, administrators, or assigns, any right to sue for the amount of such policy, or the moneys assured or secured thereby, until a written notice of the date and purport of such assignment has been given to the assurance company liable under such policy at its principal place of business for the time being; and the date on which such notice was received shall regulate the priority of all claims under any assignment; and a payment bona fide made in respect of any policy by any assurance company before the date on which such notice was received shall be as valid against the assignee giving such notice as if this Act had not been passed.” [110]

North J. in this case interpreted this section in the following manner:

“That Act was passed in order to avoid the necessity of joining the assignor of the policy in actions against the insurance office, and it provides that if a certain notice is given to the office then the assignee may sue without joining the assignor. Then these words occur ‘And the date on which such notice shall be received shall regulate the priority of all claims under any assignment.’ It was contended that these words went much further than was necessary for the protection of the insurance office, and affected the rights of the parties inter se . ... In my opinion that is not the meaning of the statute, which was not intended to give a simpler remedy against an insurance office, and also to give facilities to insurance offices in settling claims by enabling them to recognise as the first claim the claim of the person who first gave such notice as required by the statute. It was not intended in my opinion to enact that a person who had advanced money upon a second charge without notice of the first, and made subject to it, should be giving statutory notice of the office exclude the person who had the prior incumbrance.” [111]

In Spencer v. Clarke [112] , a life insurance policy was used as security for two separate loans from separate parties. The contention was then which party had priority in terms of the security.

Hall, V.C. held:

“I am of the opinion that as between the Plaintiffs [the second creditor] in this action and the Defendant Tranter [the first creditor], the Defendant Tranter is entitled to priority as to the policy in the Westminster and General Life Assurance Association . That policy was deposited with him by way of equitable security. He is first in point of time, and therefore first as regards his security.” [113]

The first creditor then contended that he obtained priority by giving notice to the insurance office of his claim first in accordance with the Policies of Assurance Act 1867 . However, Hall V.C. held on this point that :

“In order to bring the case within the statute, there must, according to the plain words of the statute and the explanatory form of assignment given in the schedule, be an assignment, and an agreement to assign upon request is not an assignment.” [11]

“In essence, whether there has been a valid assignment under the provisions of the Policies of Assurance Act or section 4(6) of the Civil Law Act, all claims to priority amongst the assignees and encumbrances of a policy are dealt with on the basis that all claimants are equitable assignees so long as the proceeds of a policy are with the insurers or have been paid into court. The priority of equitable assignment is dependent on the date of assignment and the fact that there has been notice of prior equities does not affect the position. However, if X is an equitable assignee for value and Y is the holder of a prior equity, X can claim priority over Y if he has no actual or constructive notice of the earlier assignment and if he has given formal notice to the insurers of the assignment before the insurers have come to know of Y’s interest or if X has been misled by Y into taking the assignment or if Y has by his negligence contributed to the creation of the assignment to X.” [115]

Robert M. Merkin writes with regard to priorities of assignments:

“... a number of basic principles may be stated. First, the general equitable rule is that assignments rank in priority in order of their date of creation, but this is subject to the further rule that, where one or more assignees have given notice to the insurer, priority is determined by the date of notice. Secondly, the giving of notice to the insurer will obtain priority only for an assignee, whether legal or equitable, who was unaware of earlier assignments at the date of his own assignment. Knowledge for these purposes may be actual or constructive; the fact, for example, that the assured cannot deposit the policy with the assignee has been held [116] to put him on notice that it may have been deposited by way of assignment earlier. ... Thirdly, it is possible to have a legal assignment only by the giving of notice to the insurer.” [117]

S. Santhana Dass points out that :

“This common law position has been altered by Section 168(2) of the Insurance Act 1996 ... Notice of assignment to the insurers are no more relevant for the purpose of determining priority which puts the insurer in a more difficult position. Do they have to ensure that there are no prior assignment before paying to an assignee? It would be impractical to impose such a duty on the insurers because they would have no means of getting such information. As long as they pay to the assignee, whose assignment they had notice, they would be free of liability in respect of any claim, provided they have no knowledge of any earlier assignment. It may be prudent for insurers to include in their standard assignment form, a declaration by the insured that he has not created any prior assignment in respect of the policy at the time of execution of the assignment.” [118]

Section 168(2) of the Malaysian Insurance Act 1996 [119] provides :

“Where more than one person are entitled under the security or the assignment, the respective rights of the persons entitled under the security or the assignment shall be in the order of priority according to the priority of the date on which the security or the assignment was created, both security and assignment being treated as one class for this purpose.”

7.1 Assignment of Insurance Policies

Francis Tierney and Paul Braithwaite writes:

“An insurance policy is a contract under which the insured has defined rights and obligations. An assignment of an insurance policy may be defined as follows:

An assignment of an insurance policy by an insured is the transfer of the rights and obligations of the insured under the policy to another who then becomes the insured in place of the original insured.” [120]

Ray Hodgin writes:

“Assignment of insurance policies has an important role in commercial life. A common example is where a mortgagee requires the mortgagor to effect a life policy to cover the extent of the loan should the mortgagor die before the loan is repaid. The policy is then assigned to the mortgagee [121] .”

Roy Hodgin points out the “... desire of the courts to make the policy assignable and therefore as flexible as possible ...” [122] In order to illustrate this point, this author discusses the United States case of Grigsby v Russell [123] where a life policy was taken out by someone on his own life. This person paid two premiums and no more as he required the money for medical care. This person assigned the policy to someone else for value and the assignee continued to pay the premiums. Upon the assignor’s death, the question that arose was whether the insurance company should pay the proceeds to the assignor’s estate or the assignee. The Supreme Court of the United Stated held that the proceeds should be paid to the assignee. Mr. Justice Holmes in this case commented:

“Of course, the ground suggested for denying the validity of an assignment for a person having no interest in the life insured is the public policy that refuses to allow insurance to be taken out by such persons in the first place ... the ground for the objection to life insurance without interest in the earlier English cases was not the temptation to murder but the fact that such wagers came to be regarded as a mischievous kind of gaming ... On the other hand, life insurance has become in our days one of the best recognised forms of investment and self-compelled savings. So far as reasonable safety permits, it is desirable to give to life policies the ordinary characteristics of property ... To deny the right to sell except to persons having such an interest is to diminish appreciably the value of the contract in the owner’s hands.”

This indication of the attitude of the American courts as quoted by an English writer is noteworthy. However, in Malaysia, the courts are bound by the beneficiary of a life policy proving that he/she has an insurable interest in the life insured under section 152 of the Insurance Act 1996. [124]

“For a valid assignment of personal contracts such as contracts of fire insurance and liability insurance, the insurer’s consent is required... [125]

To be valid, an assignment by the insured of a non-life policy must be contemporaneous with an assignment of the subject matter of insurance to the assignee. The insured will not be in a position to assign the policy at a later date as he will no longer have an insurable interest in the property, in respect of which the policy was issued [126] . ...

An assignor of a life policy, which is a valuable chose in action, may effect a legal assignment of his policy by virtue of the provisions of the Policies of Assurance Act [127] , which only concerns the assignment of life policies, or by virtue of the provisions of section 4(6) of the Civil Law Act [128] , which concerns the assignment of all choses in action including life policies [129] .”

S. Santhana Dass writes:

“’Choses in action’ or ‘things in action’ are assignable.

Assignment of chose in action take places when the liabilities imposed or the rights acquired under a contract between A and B are transferred to C who is not a party to the original contract.

The expression ‘chose in action’ or ‘thing in action’, in the literal sense, means a thing recoverable by suit or action in law. ...

Rights under a contract of insurance are choses in action.” [130]

As such, it would seem that with regard to property and motor insurance, the assignment or sale of the subject matter of the insurance is insufficient to transfer the insurance policy as well. The insurance company’s consent is required before the policy will change hands. In order for the insured or original policy holder to effect a valid assignment, the insurance company’s consent and resulting assignment of the insurance policy must be contemporaneous with the assignment or sale of the subject matter since once the assignment or sale of the subject matter is complete, the insured no longer has any insurable interest in the subject matter of the insurance and as such, no more insurable interest in the policy to assign.

Nik Ramlah Mahmood explains:

“The contract of insurance itself can only be assigned with the consent of the insurer. This amounts to the substitution of a new contract for the old - a novation - and is allowed under the Contracts Act 1950 [131] . Novation results in the formation of a new contract between the insurer and the assignee and the latter is subject to all the terms and conditions of the new contract and he effectively replaces the assignor as the insured under the policy.” [132]

The assignment of life insurance policies may be effected by the insured through a legal assignment, either under the Policies of Assurance Act 1867 [133] or section 4(3) of the Civil Law Act 1956 .

7.2 Assignment of the Proceeds of Insurance Policies

“The proceeds of a policy may be assigned either in equity or at law in accordance with the provisions of section 4(6) of the Civil Law Act [134] . The insured’s right to the proceeds of a policy is a valuable chose in action and it may be assigned either before or after the occurrence of a loss. For an assignment of the proceeds of a policy, which is distinct from an assignment of the contract or policy of insurance, the consent of the insurer is not required.”

In the case of an equitable assignment of the proceeds of the policy, an action to recover the said proceeds must be brought in the name of the insured.

Where the assignor has effected a legal assignment of the proceeds of the policy in accordance with the requirements of section 4(6) of the Civil Law Act, the assignee may sue in his own name. The assignment must be an absolute assignment in writing under the assignor’s hand and express notice of such assignment must be given in writing to the insurers.

The assignee of the proceeds of the policy cannot acquire rights which are superior to those of the assignor. It follows that all the defences which could have been raised by the insurer against the assignor are equally applicable against the assignee. Thus, the insurers may avoid liability on account of the assignor’s misrepresentation or non-disclosure. Furthermore, all terms which are conditions precedent to the insurer’s liability must be complied with and the insurer may avoid liability to the assignee of the proceeds of a policy on the ground of the assignor’s failure to comply with a condition precedent. For instance, in Re Carr & Sun Fire Insurance Co., [135] the insured’s failure to provide the insurer with proof of loss within the time stipulated under the terms of the policy precluded the trustee in bankruptcy from recovering the proceeds of the policy.” [136]

7.3 Assignment of the Subject Matter of Insurance Policies

E. R. Hardy Ivamy writes:

“Before the assignee of the subject-matter can in his own name enforce the contract contained in the policy, it is necessary that the policy should be validly assigned to him... [137]

On the completion of the assignment, the rights and duties of the original assured devolve on the assignee, who becomes, to all intents and purposes, the assured under the policy which he may accordingly enforce in his own name [138] .”

“The question of an assignment of the subject matter of insurance arises when the insured property has been sold or otherwise disposed of by the insured. It does not arise in the case of life and personal accident policies because the subject matter of such policies is unassignable.

An insured who has voluntarily and completely given up his interest in the subject matter of the insurance ceases to have an insurable interest in the insured property. Such an insured can no longer make a claim under the policy with respect to the property which has been given up as he will not be in a position to suffer any loss with regard to the property.” [139]

7.4 Assignment by Operation of Law

The case of Thomas v. National Farmer’s Union Mutual Insurance Society Ltd. [140] involved the property in hay and straw on a farm being passed from a tenant to a landlord by virtue of the Agricultural Holdings Act 1948 when the landlord served a notice to quit on his tenant. Diplock J. in this case explained:

“Where property passes automatically as the result of statutory provisions when certain circumstances arise, it seems to me that this is a passing of property by operation of law.” [141]

“The insured’s interest in the policy or in the subject matter of interest may be assigned by operation of law. For instance, such an assignment will occur in the event of the death or bankruptcy of the insured.

As far as the insured’s interest in the insured property is concerned, such interest vests in the insured’s personal representative in the event of the insured’s death. On the other hand, in the event of the bankruptcy of the insured, the insured’s interest in the insured property vests in the Official Assignee. In either of these situations, the continued effectiveness of the policy is not in doubt.

Where a loss occurs before an assignment by operation of law, the insured’s personal representatives or trustee in bankruptcy, as the case may be, has the right to claim against the insurers. The position is more complicated where a loss occurs after an assignment by operation of law and after the property has been distributed to those who are entitled to the same. Most policies avoid such complications by providing that the insurer shall indemnify the insured and all other persons to whom his interest in the insured property may pass by means of a will or by operation of law.” [142]

Myint Soe writes :

“The general principle is that on death and bankruptcy, both the subject matter insured and the policy itself pass to the personal representatives or the Official Assignee, as the case may be.

However, the personal representatives or the Official Assignee cannot have a better title than the deceased or the bankrupt. The claim would be liable to be defeated by any non-disclosure or misrepresentation or breach of condition on the part of the insured before the assignment takes effect.” [143]

“Any person who takes an insurance policy should find out whether there is any special clause prohibiting or restricting assignment. Some policies may prohibit the assignment of the subject matter during the currency of the policy. Some policies may prohibit assignment otherwise than by will or operation of law.” [144]

Kenneth Sutton writes :

“A policy of insurance is or evidences a contract and is therefore, like any other agreement, subject to the general law of contract as developed by the common law and modified by statute. In addition, special rules have been developed in relation to insurance contracts. Thus, they are the most common example of that special class of contract known as contracts uberrimae fidei, that is, of utmost good faith, and hence there are special rules in relation to non-disclosure, misrepresentation and the like in respect of them.” [145]

The legal standing of assignments in the field of insurance, thus, is not a straightforward question to answer. It depends on what is being assigned and how assignments are conducted in the various branches of insurance law.

In practical terms, insurance companies themselves may not be certain of the legal stand of various claimants who clamour at their doors demanding payment on insurance claims arising out of purported assignments. Insurance companies, therefore, may demand these eager voices to prove the validity of their claims in court. The insurance company then, will make payment on the claims as directed by the superior wisdom and authority of the court of law. As Irwin M. Taylor writes:

“Insurance companies are frequently presented with conflicting claims advanced by the original beneficiary and a subsequently designated beneficiary or assignee. Rather than pay to either one at its peril, it is the practice of insurance companies to bring both claimants into a law suit, deposit the money into court and leave the two claimants to fight the matter out themselves.” [146]

A. Vijayalakshmi Venugopal*

[*] Advocate & Solicitor

High Court of Malaya

[1] A. A. Tarr, Kwai-Lian Liew & W. Holligan, Australian Insurance Law , Second Edition, The Law Book Company Limited, 1991, at page 1.

[2] Namely marine, life and fire insurance.

[3] John Lowry & Philip Rawlings, Insurance Law: Doctrines and Principles , Hart Publishing (U.S.A), 1999, at page 3.

[4] Professor K. S. N. Murthy & K. V. S. Sarma, Modern Law of Insurance in India , N. M. Tripathi Private Limited (Bombay, India), 1995, at page 3.

[5] John Birds & Norma J. Hird, Birds’ Modern Insurance Law , Fifth Edition, Sweet & Maxwell (London), 2001, at page 13.

[6] (1881) 18 Ch.D 1.

[7] Ibid 9-10.

[8] Principles of Insurance Law , Fifth Edition, Butterworths Asia, 2000, at page 1193.

[9] R. C. Kohli, An Introduction to Insurance Practice and Principles in Singapore and Malaysia, Singapore Insurance Training Centre, 1982, at page 77.

[10] William Brandt’s Sons & Co. v. Dunlop Rubber Co. (1905) A.C. 454 (House of Lords) per Lord Macnaghten, at page 462.

[11] David Norwood & John P. Weir, Norwood on Life Insurance Law in Canada , Second Edition, Carswell Thomson Professional Publishing, 1993, at page 258.

[12] Malcolm A. Clarke, The Law of Insurance Contracts , Second Edition, Lloyd’s of London Press Ltd, 1994, at page 170.

[13] Act 553.

[14] Act 67 (revised 1972).

[15] This Act is declared to come into force on 7 April 1956.

[16] 30 and 31 Victoria, chapter 144.

[17] 15 and 16 Geo. V., chapter 20.

[18] A ‘chose in action’ has been defined by Erin Goh, Valerie Low and Low Kee Yang (editor) in Butterworths Law for Business Series - Insurance Law , Butterworths Asia, 2001, at page 191 in the following manner, “A chose in action is the right to demand payment of a sum of money or to recover damages under a contract.”

[19] Nik Ramlah Mahmood, Insurance Law in Malaysia , Butterworths, 1992, at pages 207-208.

[20] [1984] 1 MLJ 260 (Federal Court).

[21] Quoted and discussed above.

[22] [1984] 1 MLJ 260 (Federal Court), at page 264.

[23] 6 Edw 7, c. 41 (United Kingdom).

[24] Halsbury’s Statutes of England and Wales, Fourth Edition, Volume 22, 2000 Reissue, Butterworths (London), 2000, at page 42.

[25] Ibid 43.

[26] Robert Merkin (Editor), Colinvaux’s Law of Insurance , Sixth Edition, Sweet & Maxwell (London), 1990, at pages 405-406.

[27] Halsbury’s Statutes of England and Wales, Fourth Edition, Volume 22, 2000 Reissue, Butterworths (London), 2000, at page 25.

[28] Michael Parkington, Nicholas Leigh-Jones, Andrew Longmore & John Birds (Editors), Macgillivray & Parkington on Insurance Law - relating to all risks other than marine, Eighth Edition, Sweet & Maxwell (London), 1988, at pages 714-715.

[29] The cases quoted in support of this proposition in this book, at page 714 are Rayner v. Preston (1881) 18 Ch. D. 1, at page 7 per Cotton L,J, Ecclesiastical Commissioners v. Royal Exchange Assurance Corporation (1895) 11 TLR 476, Robson v. Liverpool, London and Globe Insurance Co. (1900) The Times, June 23, Rogerson v. Scottish Automobile and General Insurance Co. Ltd. (1931) 48 TLR 17, Tattersall v. Drysdale [1935] 2 K.B. 174 and Boss and Hansford v. Kingston [1962] 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 431.

[30] The case quoted in support of this proposition, at page 714 of this book is Forbes & Co. v. Border Counties Fire Office (1873) 11 Macph. 278.

[31] The case quoted in support of this proposition in this book, at page 714 is Collingridge v. Royal Exchange Assurance Corporation (1877) 3 QBD 173.

[32] The cases quoted in support of this proposition in this book, at page 715 are Castellain v. Preston (1883) 11 QBD 380, at page 385 per Brett L.J. and A.R. Williams Machinery Co. v. British Crown Assurance Corporation Ltd . (1921) BCR 481.

[33] The case quoted in support of this proposition in this book, at page 715 is the judgment of Bowen L.J. in Castellain v. Preston (1883) 11 Q.B.D. 380, at pages 401 and 405. This author also comments that once the vendor is fully paid, however, his interest will cease and he will be unable to recover as was held in Bank of New South Wales v. North British and Mercantile Insurance Co. (1881) 2 NSWLR 239.

[34] Digby C. Jess, The Insurance of Commercial Risks Law and Practice , Second Edition, Butterworths (London), 1993, at page 15.

[35] (1875) LR 10 QB 249.

[36] (1875) LR 10 QB 249, at page 253.

[37] (1743) 1 Wils. KB 10; 95 ER 463.

[38] (1743) 1 Wils. KB 10, at page 10; 95 ER 463, at page 463.

[39] (1895) 11 TLR 476 (High Court).

[40] Id 476.

[41] (1877) 3 QBD 173.

[42] Ibid 176-177.

[43] Ibid 177.

[44] (1881) 18 Ch.D 1.

[45] Ibid 6.

[46] Ibid 6-7.

[47] (1881) 18 Ch.D 1, at page 11.

[48] Ibid 12.

[49] Ibid 16.

[50] (1883) 11 QBD 380 (Court of Appeal).

[51] (1883) 11 QBD 380 (Court of Appeal), at page 386.

[52] Ibid 393.

[53] Ibid 396-397.

[54] Mahinder Singh Sidhu, Casebook on Motor Insurance Law in Malaysia and Singapore - with synopsis and principles, International Law Book Services, 1995, at page 25.

[55] Ibid 31.

[56] [1938] 2 All ER 267 (Court of Appeal).

[57] Ibid 269.

[58] Ibid 269-270.

[59] Ibid 270.

[60] The equivalent Act in Malaysia is the Road Transport Act 1987 (Act 333).

[61] Refer to section 35 of the United Kingdom Act and section 90 of the Malaysian Act.

[62] Refer to section 10 of the United Kingdom Act and section 91 of the Malaysian Act.

[63] Who was the seller of the car.

[64] [1938] 2 All ER 267 (Court of Appeal), at pages 270-271.

[65] [1963] 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 439 (High Court).

[66] [1963] 2 Lloyd’s Rep. 439 (High Court), at page 440.

[67] [1967] 1 MLJ 94 (Federal Court).

[68] Ibid 96.

[69] [1967] 2 MLJ 134 (Federal Court).

[70] Ibid 136.

[71] [1935] 2 KB 174.

[72] Ibid 178.

[73] [1981] 2 MLJ 324 (Federal Court).

[74] This judgment was delivered by Lee Hun Hoe C.J. (Borneo).

[75] [1937] 4 All ER 628 (High Court). Discussed above is the Court of Appeal judgment.

[76] [1981] 2 MLJ 324 (Federal Court), at page 325.

[77] Ibid 325.

[78] S. Santhana Dass, Law of Life Insurance in Malaysia , Alpha Sigma Sdn Bhd, 2000, at page 1.

[79] Robert Merkin (Editor), Colinvaux’s Law of Insurance, Sixth Edition, Sweet & Maxwell (London), 1990, at page 178.

[80] Robert J. Surridge, Sara Forrest, Noleen Dignan, Alison Broadberry & Duncan Backus, Houseman and Davies Law of Life Assurance , Eleventh Edition, Butterworths (London), 1994, at page 1.

[81] Ibid 262

[82] Nik Ramlah Mahmood, Insurance Law in Malaysia , Butterworths, 1992, at page 206.

[83] (1854) 15 CB 365; 139 ER 465.

[84] Ibid page 387; 139 ER 465, at page 474.

[85] (1854) 15 C.B. 365, at page 391; 139 E.R. 465, at page 476.

[86] S. Santhana Dass, Law of Life Insurance in Malaysia , Alpha Sigma Sdn Bhd, 2000, at page 287.

[87] An Act in the United Kingdom.

[88] Robert J. Surridge, Sara Forrest, Noleen Dignan, Alison Broadberry & Duncan Backus, Houseman and Davies Law of Life Assurance , Eleventh Edition, Butterworths (London), 1994, at page 263.

[90] (1888) 40 Ch.D 5.

[91] The Policies of Assurance Act 1867.

[92] (1888) 40 Ch.D 5, at page 10.

[93] Act 56.

[94] This Act came into force in West Malaysia on 7 April 1956.

[95] S. Santhana Dass, Law of Life Insurance in Malaysia , Alpha Sigma Sdn Bhd, 2000, at page 276.

[96] Ibid 281-282.

[97] Robert J. Surridge, Sara Forrest, Noleen Dignan, Alison Broadberry & Duncan Backus, Houseman and Davies Law of Life Assurance , Eleventh Edition, Butterworths (London), 1994, at page 265.

[98] Ray Hodgin, Insurance Law - Text and Materials , Cavendish Publishing Limited (United Kingdom), 1998, at page 63.

[99] [1949] 1 All ER 120 (Court of Appeal).

[100] Ibid 126.

[101] Nik Ramlah Mahmood, Insurance Law in Malaysia , Butterworths, 1992, at pages 206-207.

[102] Tan Lee Meng, Insurance Law in Singapore , Second Edition, Butterworths Asia, 1997, at page 415.

[103] (1917) 1 Ch.D 1 (Court of Appeal).

[104] Ibid 2.

[105] Ibid 7.

[106] Ibid 8.

[107] Ibid 8.

[108] Ibid 7.

[109] (1885) 28 Ch.D 674.

[110] Poh Chu Chai, Principles of Insurance Law , Fifth Edition, Butterworths Asia, 2000, at page 1208.

[111] (1885) 28 Ch.D 674, at pages 680 and 681.

[112] (1878) 9 Ch.D 137.

[113] Ibid 140.

[114] Ibid 141.

[115] Tan Lee Meng, Insurance Law in Singapore , Second Edition, Butterworths Asia, 1997, at page 417.

[116] The authority given in this book, at page D.1.2-04, for this proposition is the case of Re Weniger’s Policy (1910) 2 Ch.D 291.

[117] Robert M. Merkin, Kluwer’s Insurance Contract Law , Croner CCH, 2000, at page D.1.2-04.

[118] S. Santhana Dass, Law of Life Insurance in Malaysia , Alpha Sigma Sdn Bhd, 2000, at page 284.

[119] Act 553.

[120] Francis Tierney & Paul Braithwaite, A Guide to Effective Insurance , Second Edition, Butterworths Canada Ltd., 1992, at page 13.

[121] Ray Hodgin, Insurance Law - Text and Materials , Cavendish Publishing Limited (United Kingdom), 1998, at page 63.

[122] Ibid .

[123] 222 US 149 (1911).

[124] Act 553.

[125] Tan Lee Meng, Insurance Law in Singapore , Second Edition, Butterworths Asia, 1997, at page 411

[126] Ibid 413.

[127] According to footnote 27, at page 413 of this book, prior to the coming into force of the English Policies of Assurance Act 1867, a life policy could only be assigned in equity and not through a legal assignment. The equitable assignee could only sue by

having the assignor of the policy joined as a party to the action.

[128] The equivalent Malaysian provision is section 4(3) of the Civil Law Act 1956

[129] Tan Lee Meng, Insurance Law in Singapore , Second Edition, Butterworths Asia, 1997, at page 413.

[130] S. Santhana Dass, Law of Life Insurance in Malaysia , Alpha Sigma Sdn Bhd, 2000, at page 274

[131] Nik Ramlah Mahmood, at page 209, in footnote number 12 clarifies that she is referring to section 63 of the Contracts Act 1950 (Act 136) in this context which states, “If the parties to a contract agree to substitute a new contract for it, or to rescind or alter it, the original contract need not be performed.”

[132] Nik Ramlah Mahmood, Insurance Law in Malaysia , Butterworths, 1992, at page 209.

[133] If that applies in Malaysia as discussed by Nik Ramlah Mahmood, Insurance Law in Malaysia , Butterworths, 1992, at pages 207-208.

[134] The equivalent Malaysian provision is section 4(3) of the Civil Law Act 1956 (Act 65).

[135] (1897) 13 TLR 186.

[136] Tan Lee Meng, Insurance Law in Singapore , Second Edition, Butterworths Asia, 1997, at pages 410-411

[137] E. R. Hardy Ivamy, General Principles of Insurance Law , Sixth Edition, Butterworths (London), 1993, at page 348.

[138] Ibid 353.

[139] Tan Lee Meng, Insurance Law in Singapore , Second Edition, Butterworths Asia, 1997, at page 407.

[140] [1961] 1 WLR 386.

[141] [1961] 1 WLR 386, at page 392.

[142] Tan Lee Meng, Inssurance Law in Singapore , Second Edition, Butterworths Asia, 1997, at pages 430-431.

[143] Myint Soe, The Insurance Law of Malaysia , Quins Pte. Ltd., 1979, at page 62.

[144] Ibid .

[145] Kenneth Sutton, Insurance Law in Australia , Third Edition, LBC Information Services, 1999, at pages 11-12.

Locating deceased family member's insurance

Tools for finding life insurance coverage

What to do once you find a life insurance policy.

Legal and Privacy Considerations

Finding life insurance policy frequently asked questions

How to find a life insurance policy.

Affiliate links for the products on this page are from partners that compensate us (see our advertiser disclosure with our list of partners for more details). However, our opinions are our own. See how we rate insurance products to write unbiased product reviews.

The NAIC can help locate a deceased loved one's life insurance or annuity information.
To use this free online service, you'll need the person's death certificate and your email address.
When you submit information, the NAIC will search insurance and annuity companies on your behalf.

Discussing life insurance information with your family or loved ones is important, but it doesn't always happen. After a loved one's passing, you might be unsure of whether they have a life insurance policy. To submit a life insurance claim, however, you'll need to know which life insurance company holds the person's policy.

A service offered by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) can help anyone who could be a policy beneficiary locate the person's policy. Filling out the NAIC's form online submits the person's information to insurance companies for a record search, and the service can help you locate the person's policy.

The service allows searches both for life insurance policies and annuities, which are insurance plans purchased to provide future retirement income. The NAIC provides this search service for free.

It's worth noting that this search service shouldn't be your first step in the process. Before submitting a search, the NAIC recommends checking the person's bank statements for any indication of payments towards a policy, checking safe deposit boxes for information, or other financial records if available. If you find information on their policy, this tool won't be necessary — you can then contact the insurance company directly.

If you've checked around and still can't find any information, the policy locator service could help.

Locating deceased family member's insurance

Gathering necessary information.

Before hunting down a life insurance policy, having these items and pieces of information on hand will make the process easier:

The deceased's legal first and last name and any former names (e.g., a maiden name)
The deceased's Social Security number
The deceased's date of birth
The deceased's date of death and death certificate
The deceased's last and former addresses, especially for any long-time residences
Proof of your identity (e.g., copy of a government-issued driver's license or passport)
The deceased's financial records (e.g., bank statements and tax returns)

Contacting insurance companies

If you know the insurance company your loved one had a policy with, contact their insurance agent or the company. The insurer may require proof you're the beneficiary, so be prepared to provide your driver's license, Social Security number, and the policyholder's death certificate.

NAIC's Life Insurance Policy Locator Service

If you don't know the insurance company your deceased loved one has a policy with, the NAIC's Life Insurance Policy Locator Service can help with your search.

The NAIC's tool sends the information on your loved one to insurance and annuity companies across the US. These companies then search their records to see if there's a policy on file for that person.

Only people who may be policy beneficiaries or executors of an estate can submit a request to the NAIC. Any information found by the search can only be passed along if the person submitting the request is the policy's beneficiary or is authorized to receive information.

Most of the information needed to complete the form is available on the person's death certificate. If you don't already have this document, you can order one. The process for getting this can vary from state to state, but the funeral home the family worked with or the county's vital records department is a good place to start.

After getting a death certificate, you can start filling in information on the locator service's form, which can be found on the NAIC's website.

The information you submit will be passed along to insurance companies for a search. If any results are found, the company will contact you directly by email as long as you are a beneficiary or otherwise authorized to receive that information. From there, you can work with the insurance company to collect the benefit.

It's worth noting, however, that not all companies participate in this service, as insurers participate on a voluntary basis. There's no guarantee that a policy will be found. If you do find information on a policy, you can start the process of submitting a claim directly with the life insurance company.

National Association of Unclaimed Property Office

Another resource to look into is your state's comptroller's Unclaimed Property Office. If a life insurance company is aware that a policyholder has died but can't locate the beneficiary, it must turn over the death benefit to the state.

If you know or can guess the state in which the policy was bought, you can visit the state's Unclaimed Property Office using the locator tool provided by the National Association of Unclaimed Property Administrators .

Filing a claim

Once you've identified the insurance company and retrieved the deceased's policy information, follow these steps to claim a found life insurance policy:

Contact the insurance company: The insurer will provide the claims form and instructions. Claim forms may also be available on the insurer's website.
Complete the claims forms: The insurer may require the policyholder's information including their name, date and cause of death (located on the death certificate), state of residence, social security number, and policy number.
Submit the death certificate: Obtain the policyholder's death certificate from the funeral home or your state's vital statistics office and submit it with your claim form. Note that each beneficiary must complete a claim form and provide the required documentation to receive their portion of the death benefit.
Wait for processing: Insurance companies generally disburse policy proceeds within three to five days. However, it may take longer if the insurer suspects that the policyholder's death is excluded from coverage. Feel free to follow up if the process is taking longer than expected.

Understanding the policy's benefits

Each beneficiary is entitled to their portion of the death benefit as specified by the policy. An attractive feature of a life insurance policy is that beneficiaries don't pay taxes on the proceeds if disbursed in a lump sum.

However, if you retain the funds in an interest-bearing account, you'll have to pay taxes on the earnings in the account. Similarly, if the beneficiary receives the death benefit as an annuity or receives multiple payments over time, any interest accrued will be subject to taxes as well.

According to Policygenius, some deaths don't qualify for coverage. If the policyholder dies due to the following restricted causes, this could nullify your right to the death benefit.

Death due to engaging in a risky habit or activity is excluded from your policy
Murder by the policy's beneficiary
Suicide within the suicide clause period
Overdose within the contestability period
Death during an act of war or terrorism
Drug or alcohol use during the contestability period
Death while participating in an illegal activity

Legal and privacy considerations

Insurance companies must abide by privacy laws when disclosing policy details. Insurers may only provide policy information to the following individuals.

The closest living relative (e.g., spouse or child)
The policy's beneficiary
Estate executors and Trustees

You'll want to consider your dependent's needs, your financial goals, and your budget when comparing life insurance policy options. If you want affordable coverage until your kids become adults or your mortgage is paid off, term life insurance may be the way to go. Alternatively, if you have lifelong dependents or want to grow your policy to leave a larger death benefit or pay for long-term care costs, a permanent life insurance policy is worth considering.

You'll need the deceased's personal information including their full name, Social Security number, date of birth, former addresses, and policy information (if available). Financial records, such as bank statements or tax returns, may also reveal information about existing life insurance policies.

Start by checking the deceased's personal records, such as files, paperwork, or financial documents for evidence of an existing life insurance policy. If you know the insurance company, you can call them directly to provide you with available policy information. The state Unclaimed Property Office and the NAIC policy locator service are also tools that can help you track down potential insurance benefits.

Challenges such as incomplete information and privacy laws make it difficult to locate a missing insurance policy. Overcome these obstacles by gathering as much information as possible, tapping into available resources for help, and seeking legal advice if necessary.

Only the beneficiaries named in the policy or their legal representatives have the right to file a claim on a life insurance policy.

Editorial Note: Any opinions, analyses, reviews, or recommendations expressed in this article are the author’s alone, and have not been reviewed, approved, or otherwise endorsed by any card issuer. Read our editorial standards .

Please note: While the offers mentioned above are accurate at the time of publication, they're subject to change at any time and may have changed, or may no longer be available.

**Enrollment required.

Main content

Ch. 5 - Policy, Provisions, Options and Riders

1800 102 2355
Download the APP
1800 102 2355 [9:30AM-6:30PM]
Branch Locator
Customer Portal Login
Advisor Portal Login

What is Assignment and Nomination in Life Insurance?

‘Assignment’ and ‘Nomination’ are two most common terms used in a life insurance policy document. Let us understand the importance of these two terms in-detail.

By Future Generali Updated On Oct 06, 2022

What is Assignment and Nomination in Life Insurance?

Your life insurance policy is a contract between you (insured) and the insurance company (insurer). The contract is filled with jargon. To the extent possible, we must understand all the terms mentioned in the policy bond (certificate). ‘Assignment’ and ‘Nomination’ are two most common terms used in the insurance world.

For instance, in the event that you plan to apply for a home loan, your home loan provider will surely use these terms. Hence, it is best to be sure and understand exactly what the terms mean before you make a decision to buy the policy.

What is assignment in life insurance?

A life insurance policy can be assigned when rights of one person are transferred to another. The rights to your insurance policy can be transferred to someone else for various reasons. The process is known as assignment.

An “assignor” (policyholder) is the person who assigns the insurance policy. An “assignee” is the person to whom the policy rights have been transferred, i.e. the person to whom the policy has been assigned.

In the event rights are transferred from an Assignor to an Assignee, the rights of the policyholder are canceled, and the Assignee becomes the owner of the insurance policy.

People often assign their life insurance policies to banks. A bank becomes the policy owner in this case, while the original policyholder continues to be the life assured whose death may be claimed by either the bank or the policy owner.

Types of Assignment

There are two ways to assign an insurance policy. They are as follows:

1. Absolute Assignment

During this process, the rights of the assignor (policyholder) will be completely transferred to the assignee (person to whom the policy rights have been transferred). It is not subject to any conditions.

As an example, Mr. Rajiv Tripathi owns a Rs 1 Crore life insurance policy. Mr. Tripathi wants to gift his wife this policy. Specifically, he wants to make “absolute assignment” of the policy in his wife's name, so that the death benefit (or maturity proceeds) can be paid directly to her. After the absolute assignment has been made, Mrs. Tripathi will own this policy, and she will be able to transfer it to someone else again.

2. Conditional Assignment

As part of this type of assignment, certain conditions must be met before the transfer of rights occurs from the Assignor to the Assignee. The Policy will only be transferred to the Assignee if all conditions are met.

For instance, a term insurance policy of Rs 50 Lakh is owned by Mr. Dinesh Pujari. Mr. Pujari is applying for a home loan of Rs 50 Lakh. For the loan, the banker asked him to assign the term policy in their name. To acquire a home loan, Mr. Pujari can assign the insurance policy to the home loan company. In the event of Mr. Pujari’s death (during the loan tenure), the bank can collect the death benefit and get their money back from the insurance company.

Mr. Pujari can get back his term insurance policy if he repays the entire amount of his home loan. As soon as the loan is repaid, the policy will be transferred to Mr. Pujari.

In the event that the insurer receives a death benefit that exceeds the outstanding loan balance, the bank will be paid from the difference between the death benefit and the loan and the balance will be paid directly to the nominee. In the above example, the remaining amount (if any) will be paid to Mr. Pujari’s beneficiaries (legal heirs/nominee).

Key Points to know Note About Assignment

In regards to the assignment, the following points should be noted:

A policy assignment transfers/changes only the ownership, not the risk associated with it. The person assured thus becomes the insured.
The assignment may lead to cancellation of the nomination in the policy only when it is done in favour of the insurance company due to a policy loan.
Assignment for all insurance plans except for the pension plan and the Married Women's Property Act (MWP), can be done.
A policy contract endorsement is required to effect the assignment.

What is nomination in life insurance?

Upon the death of the life assured, the nominee/ beneficiary (generally a close relative) receives the benefits. Policyholders appoint nominees to receive benefits. Under the Insurance Act, 1938, Section 39 governs the nomination process.

Types of Nominees

In a life insurance policy, the policyholder names someone who will receive the benefits in the event of the life assured's death. Here are a few types of nominees:

1. Beneficial Nominees

In accordance with the law, the beneficiary of the claimed benefits will be any immediate family member nominated by the policyholder (like a spouse, children, or parents). Beneficiary nominees are limited to immediate family members of the beneficiary.

2. Minor Nominees

It is common for individuals to name their children as beneficiaries of their life insurance policies. Minor nominees (under the age of 18) are not allowed to handle claim amounts. Hence, the policyholder needs to designate a custodian or appointee. Payments are made to the appointee until the minor reaches the age of 18.

3. Non-family Nominees

Nominees can include distant relatives or even friends as beneficiaries of a life insurance policy.

4. Changing Nominees

It is okay for policyholders to change their nominees as often as they wish, but the latest nominee should take priority over all previous ones.

Key Points to Note About Nomination

In regards to the nomination, the following points should be noted:

In order to nominate, the policyholder and life assured must be the same.
In the case of a different policyholder and life assured, the claim benefits will be paid to the policyholder.
Nominations cannot be changed or modified.
The policy can have more than one nominee.
As part of successive nominations, if the life assured appoints person “A” as the first person to receive benefits. Now, in the event of the life assured’s death after person “A” dies, the claim benefits will be given to person “B”. The benefits will be available to Nominee “C” if Nominee “A” and Nominee “B” have passed away.

What is the difference between nomination and assignment?

Let's talk about the differences between assignment and nomination.

Nomination and Assignment serve different purposes. The nomination protects the interests of the insured as well as an insurer in offering claim benefits under the life insurance policy. On the other hand, assignment protects the interests of an assignee in availing the monetary benefits under the policy. The policyholder should be aware of both of them before buying life insurance.

Connect with our trusted financial advisors right away!

Fill in below details to get a call back

One of our associate will connect with you soon.

Latest Articles

Life Insurance 4 min What is Investment? A Complete guide to start your investment journey.

By Future Generali Dec 06, 2023

Life Insurance 5 min Endowment Policy: Returns, Benefits & Requirement

By Future Generali Sep 06, 2023

Life Insurance 4 min Understanding Sum Assured: Significance & Calculation

By Future Generali Jul 28, 2023

Couldn't find what you are looking for? TRY SEARCH

ARN No.: Comp-April-2022_534.

Conditional Assignment of a Life Insurance Policy

The process of transferring rights of a Life Insurance Policy is called Assignment. There are 2 types of Assignment:

Absolute Assignment
Conditional Assignment

Conditional Assignment means that the Transfer of Rights will happen from the Assignor to the Assignee subject to certain terms and conditions. If the conditions are fulfilled then only the Policy will get transferred from the Assignor to the Assignee. Or the policy will get transferred from the Assignor to the Assignee till certain conditions are fulfilled. Once the conditions are fulfilled, the policy automatically gets transferred back to the original owner, i.e. the Assignor.

Let’s take an example:

Rahul owns a Life Insurance Policy of Rs 5 lakhs. He needs to take a loan for his daughter’s school admission. He thought of doing so by taking a loan from the insurer itself or any bank against his Life Insurance Policy of Rs 5 lakhs that he owned.

However, to take a loan from the insurer itself or any bank, he needed to transfer the rights of the Insurance Policy to that entity. Thus he would have had to perform Conditional Assignment of the policy to that Bank. Then the bank would be able to pay out the loan money to him by taking the Insurance Policy as collateral. Thus, if Rahul failed to repay the loan, then the bank would surrender the policy and recover their money.

Once Rahul’s loan is completely repaid, then the policy would automatically come back to Rahul. In case, Rahul died before completely repaying the loan, then also the bank can surrender the policy to get their money back. This type of Assignment is called Conditional Assignment.

Example in real life of Conditional Assignment happens in case of an Insurance Policy being taken by the employer as a perquisite for the employee and it would be given only if he stays with the company for at least 5 years. Then the policy would be purchased by the employer on the employee’s name, but it would get transferred to him only when he completes 5 years. Once the employee completes 5 years of service, the policy gets transferred to him. This type of assignment or transfer of rights of a Life Insurance Policy is called Conditional Assignment.

Sachin Telawane is a Content Manager and writes on various aspects of the Insurance industry. His enlightening insights on the insurance industry has guided the readers to make informed decisions in the course of purchasing insurance plans.

COMMENTS

Absolute Assignment of Life Insurance Policies
An absolute assignment on a life insurance policy transfers the policy's ownership rights to another party. Reasons for making an absolute assignment include financing a charitable gift and ...
Absolute vs Collateral Assignment of Life Insurance
Absolute assignment in insurance involves signing over your entire policy to another person or entity. The person who is selling or gifting the policy is known as the assignor, and the individual or individuals who receive it are the assignee. The assignee takes full ownership of the policy, being held liable for any premiums and also having ...
What is an Absolute Assignment?
Absolute assignment refers to a policyholder transferring his or her ownership of a policy to another party. That transfer means that all of the coverage within that policy will now go to the newly named party. The original owner of the policy does not have to state his or her reasons for doing so nor does he or she need to stipulate any ...
What is Absolute Assignment? Explaining Insurance
In life insurance, the term absolute assignment refers to the transfer of all interest, rights, and ownership of an asset â€" in this case, the life insurance policy. This decision is irrevocable, which means it cannot be changed once it is in place. It also applies both to the present and in the future. For those who are purchasing a life ...
Absolute Assignment of a Life Insurance Policy
The process of transferring rights of a Life Insurance Policy is called Assignment. There are 2 types of Assignment. Absolute Assignment. Conditional Assignment. Absolute Assignment means complete Transfer of Rights. The person who transfers the rights is called the Assignor and the person to whom the rights are being transferred is called the ...
2 Ways to Transfer Ownership of a Life Insurance Policy
A policyowner can transfer either all or only some of the "bundle of rights" that comprises a life insurance policy to almost any person or entity. The two basic ways of making a lifetime transfer of a policy are: (1) the absolute assignment; and (2) the collateral assignment. An absolute assignment, as its name implies, transfers all the ...
A Collateral Assignment of Life Insurance
Katharine Beer. A collateral assignment of life insurance is a conditional assignment appointing a lender as an assignee of a policy. Essentially, the lender has a claim to some or all of the ...
What Is a Life Insurance Assignment?
Absolute Assignment. When you make an absolute assignment, the rights, title and interest in the life insurance policy pass on to another party without the possibility of reversal.
Collateral Assignment of Life Insurance
A collateral assignment of life insurance is a method of securing a loan by using a life insurance policy as collateral. If you pass away before the loan is repaid, the lender can collect the ...
Life Insurance Assignment
There are two parties to a collateral assignment. Assignor - Is the owner of the life insurance policy. Assignee - Is the lender. Life insurance companies have standardized forms used for this purpose. The owner completes the form and sends it to the lender for review and signature. Once complete, you will send the form to the insurance ...
Absolute Assignment
Absolute Assignment is a legal instrument that allows the owner of a life insurance policy or other valuable assets to transfer all rights and ownership of the asset to a designated assignee. This transfer of ownership is comprehensive and unrestricted, giving the assignee complete control and authority over the asset.
Understanding What is Assignment in Life Insurance Policy
An assignment is a legal process through which policy ownership transfers from an assignor to an assignee. It can be beneficial under multiple circumstances, especially in a financial emergency. Therefore, before you buy a life insurance plan, understand these features since they can help you in the future. In addition, the assignment of a life ...
Unlocking Financial Security: The Power of Absolute Assignment in Life
An absolute assignment of a life insurance policy refers to the legal process where the policy owner transfers all rights and ownership of the policy to a designated assignee. This transfer is all-encompassing and grants the assignee complete control and authority over the policy.
chapter 4 Life provisions exam Flashcards
Study with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like The absolute assignment of a life insurance policy results in, How is the insured protected if a payor benefit rider is attached to the life insurance policy?, A life insurance policy that contains an accelerated (living) benefit rider will provide funds if the and more.
Assigning Your Life Insurance Policy
You can freely assign your life insurance policy unless some limitation is specified in your contract (your insurance company can furnish the required assignment forms). Through an assignment, you can transfer your rights to all or a portion of the policy proceeds to an assignee. The extent to which these rights are transferable depends on the ...
What Is Collateral Assignment of Life Insurance?
Collateral assignment of life insurance is an arrangement where you agree to give a lender the first claim to the payout from your life insurance policy. This allows your life insurance to serve as the collateral that many loans — especially small business loans or Small Business Administration (SBA) loans — require before they can lend you money you need.
PDF Absolute assignment of life insurance policy to an individual
Absolute assignment of life insurance policy to an individual Important Note An absolute assignment is the transfer of a life policy to another person. Once the policy is assigned, the assignor (policy owner) loses all rights to benefits under the policy. The assignee will receive all future correspondence on the policy.
Absolute Assignment
Absolute Assignment in insurance refers to the complete transfer of all rights, liabilities, and benefits of a life insurance policy from the policy owner (assignor) to another person or entity (assignee). After the assignment, the assignee becomes the new policy owner and is entitled to all the benefits such as death benefits and maturity ...
ASSIGNMENTS IN INSURANCE LAW
"The requirements for an absolute assignment of a life policy are as follows:-(a) the assignment must be in writing and signed by the assignor (the insured); ... The assignment of life insurance policies may be effected by the insured through a legal assignment, either under the Policies of Assurance Act 1867 [133] or section 4(3) of the ...
Finding a Life Insurance Policy: Essential Guide for 2024
Before hunting down a life insurance policy, having these items and pieces of information on hand will make the process easier: The deceased's legal first and last name and any former names (e.g ...
Flashcards
The absolute assignment of a life insurance policy results in a. all incidents of ownership transferred to the assignee b. the assignee receives partial incidents of ownership c. the transfer of ownership is revocable at the discretion of the original policyowner d. evidence of insurability must be proven before ownership is transferred
What is Assignment and Nomination in Life Insurance?
Conclusion. Nomination and Assignment serve different purposes. The nomination protects the interests of the insured as well as an insurer in offering claim benefits under the life insurance policy. On the other hand, assignment protects the interests of an assignee in availing the monetary benefits under the policy.
Assignment of Policy
Assignment of a life insurance policy means transfer of rights from one person to another. You can transfer the rights on your life insurance policy to another person/entity for various reasons. This process is referred to as Assignment and is governed under Policies of Assurance Act (Chapter 392). ... Deed of Absolute Assignment (Single ...
Conditional Assignment of a Life Insurance Policy
The process of transferring rights of a Life Insurance Policy is called Assignment. There are 2 types of Assignment: Absolute Assignment; Conditional Assignment; Conditional Assignment means that the Transfer of Rights will happen from the Assignor to the Assignee subject to certain terms and conditions. If the conditions are fulfilled then ...

What is Absolute vs Collateral Assignment of Life Insurance?

What is absolute assignment of life insurance?

What is a collateral assignment of life insurance?

Compare Life Insurance Policy Assignments

Life Credit Company

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Absolute Assignment

Insuranceopedia Explains Absolute Assignment

Related Definitions

Auto Insurance

What is Absolute Assignment in Life Insurance?

Absolute Assignment Clearly and Briefly Explained

800-556-9393

800-324-6370

2 Ways to Transfer Ownership of a Life Insurance Policy

Requirements

Absolute Assignments

Tax Implications

Nontax Implications

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

What Is a Collateral Assignment of Life Insurance?

Key Takeaways

How a Collateral Assignment of Life Insurance Works

Example of Collateral Assignment of Life Insurance

Alternatives to Collateral Assignment of Life Insurance

What Are the Benefits of Collateral Assignment of Life Insurance?

What Kind of Life Insurance Can Be Used for Collateral?

Is Collateral Assignment of Life Insurance Irrevocable?

What is the Difference Between an Assignment and a Collateral Assignment?

The Bottom Line

What Is a Life Insurance Assignment?

Conditional Assignment

Absolute Assignment

Secured Loan

Collateral Loan

Related Articles

Collateral assignment of life insurance

How We Make Money

The Bankrate promise

Editorial integrity

Key Principles

Editorial Independence

How we make money

Insurance Disclosure

What is collateral assignment of life insurance?

Why use life insurance as collateral?

Pros and cons of using life insurance as collateral

What types of life insurance can I use as collateral for a loan?

How do I take out a loan using a collateral assignment of life insurance?

Alternatives to life insurance as collateral

Unsecured loan

Secured loan

Life insurance loan

Home equity line of credit (HELOC)

Frequently asked questions

Related Articles

Life Insurance Assignment – What They Are and Why You Need Them

Table of Contents

About The Author

Michael Horbal

WHAT IS ABSOLUTE ASSIGNMENT?

LIFE SETTLEMENT BLOG

Direct Life Settlement Buyers vs. Welcome Funds – Advisor Beware!

How to Sell Your Life Insurance Policy for $4,743,000 Instead of $275,485?

Suitability of Life Settlements

What is the Most Suitable Exit Strategy for Life Insurance?

How to Get the Highest Life Settlement Offer

Understanding the Fair Market Value of a Life Insurance Policy

The Power of a Life Settlement Auction

Rebuttals to the “Direct Buyer” Model for Life Settlements

Carrier Resistance To Life Settlements: Clients Need To Know They Can Sell Their Policies

The Danger of Trying to “Time the Market” for Life Settlements

Unlocking Financial Security: The Power of Absolute Assignment in Life Insurance

What are the results of absolute assignment?

Relacionados

Absolute Assignment

How to Conduct an Absolute Assignment?

Newly Added Terms