Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • View all journals
  • My Account Login
  • Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • Open access
  • Published: 06 May 2024

Vaccine effectiveness against emerging COVID-19 variants using digital health data

  • Tanner J. Varrelman   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8766-0129 1 ,
  • Benjamin Rader 1 , 2 ,
  • Christopher Remmel 1 ,
  • Gaurav Tuli 1 ,
  • Aimee R. Han   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8927-3432 1 ,
  • Christina M. Astley   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-5063-8470 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 &
  • John S. Brownstein   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-8568-5317 1 , 4  

Communications Medicine volume  4 , Article number:  81 ( 2024 ) Cite this article

67 Accesses

1 Altmetric

Metrics details

  • Computational biology and bioinformatics

Participatory surveillance of self-reported symptoms and vaccination status can be used to supplement traditional public health surveillance and provide insights into vaccine effectiveness and changes in the symptoms produced by an infectious disease. The University of Maryland COVID Trends and Impact Survey provides an example of participatory surveillance that leveraged Facebook’s active user base to provide self-reported symptom and vaccination data in near real-time.

Here, we develop a methodology for identifying changes in vaccine effectiveness and COVID-19 symptomatology using the University of Maryland COVID Trends and Impact Survey data from three middle-income countries (Guatemala, Mexico, and South Africa). We implement conditional logistic regression to develop estimates of vaccine effectiveness conditioned on the prevalence of various definitions of self-reported COVID-like illness in lieu of confirmed diagnostic test results.

We highlight a reduction in vaccine effectiveness during Omicron-dominated waves of infections when compared to periods dominated by the Delta variant (median change across COVID-like illness definitions: −0.40, IQR[−0.45, −0.35]. Further, we identify a shift in COVID-19 symptomatology towards upper respiratory type symptoms (i.e., cough and sore throat) during Omicron periods of infections. Stratifying COVID-like illness by the National Institutes of Health’s (NIH) description of mild and severe COVID-19 symptoms reveals a similar level of vaccine protection across different levels of COVID-19 severity during the Omicron period.

Conclusions

Participatory surveillance data alongside methodologies described in this study are particularly useful for resource-constrained settings where diagnostic testing results may be delayed or limited.

Plain language summary

Surveys that are sent out to users of social media can be used to supplement traditional methods to monitor the spread of infectious diseases. This has the potential to be particularly useful in areas where other data is unavailable, such as areas with less surveillance of infectious disease prevalence and access to infectious disease diagnostics. We used data from a survey available to users of the social media platform Facebook to collect information about any potential symptoms of COVID-19 infection and vaccines received during the COVID-19 pandemic. We found a potential reduction in vaccine effectiveness and change in symptoms when the Omicron variant was known to be circulating compared to the earlier Delta variant. This method could be adapted to monitor the spread of COVID-19 and other infectious diseases in the future, which might enable the impact of infectious diseases to be recognized more quickly.

Similar content being viewed by others

covid 19 vaccines research topics

Long COVID: major findings, mechanisms and recommendations

covid 19 vaccines research topics

Exploring the reported adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccines among vaccinated Arab populations: a multi-national survey study

covid 19 vaccines research topics

A guide to vaccinology: from basic principles to new developments

Introduction.

Timely identification of alterations in vaccine effectiveness (VE) with the emergence of novel COVID-19 variants, such as Omicron, is important for informing the global public health response. The attributable risk proportion of vaccine-preventable diseases is often estimated using relative risk measures obtained from cohort studies or odds ratios determined through case-control designs, which typically rely on gold-standard diagnostic testing 1 , 2 . These studies are conducted retrospectively, leading to a lag between variant emergence and VE estimates. In an effort to provide timely VE insights, monitoring systems have been developed that leverage digital health data 3 , 4 . However, even these real-time methodologies are bounded by some form of diagnostic testing data, whether it be self-reported or through other means of collection. While resource-rich locales across the world have managed to scale up diagnostic testing to inform pandemic response efforts, many low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) have struggled to establish widespread testing 5 , 6 , therefore limiting the applicability of current VE monitoring systems. Alternatively, digital health surveys of self-reported symptoms and vaccination status provide a data source that may be used in place of limited/delayed testing data 7 , 8 , 9 .

In this study, we use data from the University of Maryland Global COVID Trends and Impact Survey (UMD-CTIS) to develop a methodology to simultaneously characterize potential changes in VE and COVID-19 symptomatology for Delta and Omicron-dominated periods of infections. UMD-CTIS is a digital health survey that leveraged Facebook’s active user base, providing cross-sectional survey data in near real-time from 114 countries, starting in 2020 and ending in 2022. Our analyses utilize aggregate data from three MICs that were selected based on the quality of UMD-CTIS data and the presence of distinct Delta and Omicron periods of infections. The selected countries include Guatemala, Mexico, and South Africa. Our analyses of this data reveal reduced vaccine effectiveness against suspected COVID-19 infection during the Omicron period compared to Delta, as well as a shift towards more upper respiratory-type symptoms like cough and sore throat.

Syndromic surveillance data

The University of Maryland Global COVID Trends and Impact Survey (UMD-CTIS), in partnership with Facebook, is a cross-sectional survey that sampled Facebook’s active user base on a daily basis. Facebook users were presented an invitation at the top of their news feed, inviting them to participate in the survey. It is important to note that survey invitations did not include any type of incentive, and participation was driven purely by individuals’ willingness to contribute to digital health. If an individual decided to accept the invitation, they were navigated off of the Facebook platform to the digital health survey hosted by Qualtrics, with data collection being performed by the Joint Program in Survey Methodology at the University of Maryland. On the Qualtrics survey itself, respondents were shown the consent page explaining the purpose of the research to gain a better public understanding of where and how the coronavirus pandemic is spreading, that the survey would take 3–5 min, and that their responses would remain confidential and anonymous. After providing informed consent and confirmation of being at least 18 years of age, respondents could proceed with the survey. Survey respondents and non-respondents were entered back into the sampling pool after a duration of a few weeks or months, depending on the sample size for a given area. Survey data included self-reported information such as demographics, recent symptoms, and COVID-19 vaccination status. While Facebook acts as the survey sampling frame, the company cannot access individually identified respondent answers. Further, to work with these data, institutions must have a signed Data Use Agreement (data access and survey questions available https://covidmap.umd.edu ) 7 , 10 , which our institution signed in order to access and analyze the UMD-CTIS data. Boston Children’s Hospital Institutional Review Board (P00023700) approved this study using UMD-CTIS data. Additional details on the survey design, methodology, and validation can be found in Astley et al. (2021) 7 .

To select the study locations, we began by focusing on countries that met three criteria: they are included in the UMD-CTIS sample, have encountered distinct waves of COVID-19 infections primarily driven by the Delta and Omicron variants, and are considered a low or middle-income country as described by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Next, we visualized the time-series symptom data and ruled out countries where the UMD-CTIS data was noticeably erratic.

Using peak detection (Python (3.8.2), scipy.signal.argrelextrema (1.7.1), order parameter = 70) for all CLI time series (April 2021–February 2022), we infer 2-week consensus variant periods prior to each peak, for Delta and Omicron, respectively, for Guatemala (peak date September 13, 2021 [survey No. 4137] and peak date February 2, 2022 [survey No. 2387]), South Africa (July 22, 2021 [survey No. 7371] and December 19, 2021 [survey No. 5320]), and Mexico (August 22, 2021 [survey No. 52775] and January 26, 2022 [survey No. 71990]), that coincided with >80% variant share per public reports 11 .

Statistics and reproducibility

We utilize conditional logistic regression to estimate the attributable risk proportion (ARP) for illness in 2-dose vaccinated individuals (clogit function with method=’approximate’, R (4.1.1), survival library (3.2-13)). VE is given by VE = ARP ≈ 1−OR. We consider exposure as the vaccination status of a respondent (unvaccinated vs. 2-dose vaccinated), and the outcome as to whether a respondent reported CLI in past 14 days, with missing symptoms assumed absent. We also include strata for dichotomized age (>44 years), gender (male/female), and country of the survey respondent to limit potential confounding and differences in country-level sampling. Importantly, UMD-CTIS does not collect data on vaccine formulation. Consequently, we cannot definitively determine whether a single dose of any specific vaccine within our dataset consistently provides full protection, as seen with the Janssen COVID-19 vaccine formulation. Therefore, we have chosen not to include individuals who have received only one dose in this study. Age and gender were dichotomized in order to maintain sufficient sample sizes per stratum. We do not filter the individual vaccine effectiveness estimates by p -value, as we are interested in the group behavior of the CLI definitions and not the hypothesis of whether a single definition of CLI produces a statistically significant vaccine effectiveness estimate. Moreover, to maintain the same number of data points for each of our comparisons, we do not remove outlier data from the analyses in this study.

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the  Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.

To estimate VE, we adapted case-control methods 1 for prevalent COVID-like illness (CLI) as a proxy for confirmed COVID-19 cases. Therefore, our estimates of VE measure a vaccine’s ability to prevent suspected symptomatic infections defined by CLI. To allow for changes in variant-specific symptomatology, we iterate across all possible CLI defined by 66 pair-wise combinations of 12 self-reported symptoms (fever, cough, difficulty breathing, fatigue, stuffy or runny nose, aches or muscle pain, sore throat, chest pain, nausea, loss of smell or taste, headache, chills). We then cluster the vaccine effectiveness estimates according to a single symptom of interest and evaluate the median vaccine effectiveness across all CLI definitions in the cluster. As an example, using a COVID-19-specific symptom (loss of smell or taste) as an anchor symptom, we evaluate VE estimates for all CLI definitions inclusive of this symptom during Delta and Omicron waves of infections, resulting in VE estimates for 11 pairwise combinations of symptoms. Consistent with previous estimates of VE that used PCR test data as the outcome 2 , our analyses reveal a median VE Delta of 0.77, IQR[0.76, 0.80] (Fig.  1 a, triangle). In comparison, analyzing the data from the Omicron period reveals a median VE Omicron of 0.47, IQR[0.41, 0.53] (Fig.  1 a, circle). Further expanding the approach to all CLI definitions reveals a median VE Delta of 0.71, IQR[0.65, 0.75] (Fig.  1 b). In contrast, the VE Omicron estimate is even lower (median 0.29, IQR[0.20, 0.38]). Notably, our findings align with those from a recent meta-analysis study focused on real-world vaccine effectiveness for fully vaccinated individuals. This study reported a VE of 70.9% (95% CI, 68.9–72.7) against Delta infections and a VE of 23.5% (95% CI, 17.0–29.5) against Omicron variant infections 12 . To understand how VE estimates for each CLI definition vary by wave, we take the difference between the two VE period estimates (VE Omicron −VE Delta ) for each CLI definition. Doing so reveals a median within-CLI definition change of −0.40, IQR[−0.45, −0.35] (Fig.  2 a), suggesting lower VE Omicron regardless of the CLI definition that is used. Additionally, we find that the pattern of change in VE across CLI definitions is similar when evaluating individual country estimates (see Supplementary Fig.  1 ).

figure 1

a VE estimates for symptoms paired with the loss of smell or taste for the Delta (triangle) and Omicron (circle) periods. 95% confidence intervals are calculated for each VE estimate, with Delta and Omicron period estimates derived from 64,283 and 79,697 survey responses, respectively. b Box and whisker plot of VE estimates across all 66 possible CLI defined by pairwise combinations of symptoms for Delta and Omicron periods. The box represents the interquartile range (IQR) of estimates, with the horizontal line inside the box indicating the median. The whiskers extend to the largest/smallest values up to 1.5 times the IQR. Outlier values are represented as points. The sample size for each VE estimate is consistent with the sample sizes described in panel ( a ).

figure 2

a Distribution of within-CLI change (VE Omicron −VE Delta ) across all CLI definitions. b Distributions of VE Omicron −VE Delta among CLI definitions within each anchor symptom. Each box-plot contains estimates for an anchor symptom paired with the 11 other symptoms. Box-plots are ordered according to the magnitude of the median change, with the median across all VE indicated by the gray dashed line. Each box represents the interquartile range (IQR) of estimates, with the horizontal line inside the box indicating the median. The whiskers extend to the largest/smallest values up to 1.5 times the IQR. Outlier values are represented as points. Each VE estimate from the Delta and Omicron periods is derived from 64,283 and 79,697 survey responses, respectively.

To identify potential alterations in COVID-19 symptomatology, we evaluate the change in VE estimates for CLI definitions with a single anchor symptom, like loss of smell and taste. We reason that if symptoms are similar across variants, the within-anchor median change in VE will be similar across anchor symptoms. Our analyses provide evidence for a potential change in COVID-19 symptomatology from the Delta period to the Omicron period, as we note that some symptoms have more or less decline in VE (Fig.  2 b). Specifically, we find that CLI definitions that include loss of smell or taste have the smallest median change in VE (median: −0.31, IQR[−0.34, −0.28]), while definitions with the largest median change include a cough, or sore throat (cough median: −0.49, IQR[−0.52, −0.45]; sore throat median: −0.47, IQR[−0.49, −0.45]). The observed pattern of change in VE across anchor symptoms is similar when evaluating VE estimates from individual countries (see Supplementary Fig.  2) , however, with increased uncertainty in estimates as measured by the span of anchor symptom distributions (see  Supplementary Results ). Similarly, a survey-based study that used PCR testing data as the outcome demonstrated a shift away from symptomatology that includes loss of smell or taste and towards upper-respiratory type symptoms (i.e., sore throat) during the Omicron period 13 . Furthermore, a study conducted in Jalisco, Mexico, analyzed reported symptoms for confirmed infections with wild-type SARS-CoV-2, Delta, and Omicron variants, revealing that Omicron infections were linked to a higher incidence of runny nose and sore throat, aligning with the findings of our country-level analysis for Mexico (see Supplementary Fig.  3) 14 . These results corroborate our overall findings, which also identified increased reporting of sore throat during a wave of COVID-19 infections dominated by the Omicron variant. Collectively, these findings suggest a shift in symptomatology associated with the Omicron variant towards more upper respiratory-type symptoms.

In addition to providing insights into changes in COVID-19 symptomatology, the VE estimates also include information about a vaccine’s ability to protect against COVID-19 illness presenting at different levels of severity as defined by pairwise combinations of symptoms. Importantly, we do not have information about the true severity of each respondent’s reported illness, and we instead infer severity based on the presence and absence of key symptoms. For instance, all CLI definitions that include at least a fever, cough, aches or muscle pain, sore throat, nausea, loss of smell or taste, or a headache in the absence of difficulty breathing or chest pain are considered mild syndromes. However, according to the NIH, CLI definitions that include difficulty breathing or chest pain are considered more severe forms of illness 15 . To understand potential changes in VE against mild and severe COVID-19 syndromes, we partition our CLI-informed VE estimates according to the above classifications. As a result, we end up with 42 mild and 21 severe definitions of CLI. We find that severe definitions of illness were more protected than mild definitions during the Delta period (median severe VE: 0.74, IQR[0.70, 0.79], median mild VE: 0.54, IQR[0.45, 0.64]) (Fig.  3 ). However, protection against mild and severe illness was similar during Omicron (median severe VE: 0.30, IQR[0.25, 0.38], median mild VE: 0.22, IQR[0.16, 0.33]). Importantly, VE against severe illness may appear higher, as vaccines are producing milder illness when an individual is infected with COVID-19 16 , making it seem as if VE against mild illness is less effective. During the Delta wave of infections, we observed a total of 13,220 reports of mild illness and 5316 reports of severe illness. In contrast, during the Omicron wave of infections, there were 24,408 reports of mild illness and 10,234 reports of severe illness.

figure 3

VE estimates for pairwise combinations of symptoms that include a fever, cough, aches or muscle pain, sore throat, nausea, loss of smell or taste, or a headache in the absence of difficulty breathing or chest pain (mild illness), and pairwise combinations of symptoms that include difficulty breathing or chest pain (severe illness). Each box represents the interquartile range (IQR) of estimates, with the horizontal line inside the box indicating the median. The whiskers extend to the largest/smallest values up to 1.5 times the IQR. Outlier values are represented as points. Each VE estimate from the Delta and Omicron periods is derived from 64,283 and 79,697 survey responses, respectively.

It is critical to note that our estimates of VE measure the preventable syndrome attributed to receiving 2-doses of vaccine and represent only one of many components that contribute to true vaccine effectiveness. For instance, we are unable to account for asymptomatic breakthrough infections, and we do not have information on natural immunity among the unvaccinated nor on vaccine formulation or timing for the vaccinated. Therefore, we do not have enough information to distill whether changes in VE are caused by waning vaccine immunity, or increased penetration of an emerging variant. To this end, we would suggest that future digital health surveys include information on vaccine formulation, the general timing of vaccination, as well as information on booster doses that have been administered. While quickly adapting a digital health survey is a monumental task, it would enhance the capabilities of methods such as those described in this study. Furthermore, our VE estimates are solely derived from self-reported survey data and are thus vulnerable to a range of biases 17 . For instance, self-report bias is likely influenced by the perception around COVID-19 vaccination at a given time for a given locale. Even so, a U.S.-based survey that incorporated viral testing demonstrated that self-reported vaccination is a strong predictor for true vaccination status 18 , thus providing support for self-reported measures. Further, our estimates rely on the assumption that the range of self-reported CLI definitions defined in this study is a valid proxy for incident COVID-19 infection. Consequently, our VE estimates may be an underestimation if CLI is capturing non-COVID illness. We limit this assumption by selecting time periods reflective of when COVID-19 is circulating within the unvaccinated population of survey respondents for each country.

Although the assumptions mentioned above limit the interpretation of our VE estimates, the methodology still demonstrates notable strengths that should not be discounted. For example, simple surveys that collect self-reported symptoms and vaccination status can be collected rapidly and at a fraction of the cost of traditional surveillance measures 19 . Moreover, while we performed the retrospective analysis with knowledge of specific COVID-19 variants, CLI-informed VE estimates can be derived during suspected variant spread, with careful contextualization of a country’s epidemiological situation (i.e., absence of co-circulating pathogens and sufficient geographic coverage of surveys). In the case of UMD-CTIS, there was a two-week delay between survey completion and its availability for our modeling, allowing us to use it as a valuable near-real-time dataset for VE analyses. It is critical to note that UMD-CTIS collected a substantial number of survey samples from numerous countries, enabling meaningful insights into COVID-19. However, some countries within the UMD-CTIS sample exhibited noisy data, characterized by high variability in the number of reported CLI instances between time steps, which limited the utility of these specific datasets. While UMD-CTIS has yielded valuable data from a wide range of countries, it’s important to acknowledge that the determination of survey sampling intensity, size, and other attributes of sampling can impact the reliability and applicability of findings. To truly understand the minimum number of samples required for robust statistical analyses, further research, and investigation into these sampling parameters are essential. Such efforts will not only enhance the effectiveness of syndromic surveillance but also contribute to more accurate and comprehensive insights into COVID-19 dynamics.

Historically, understanding the impact of infectious diseases, including the effectiveness of vaccination, has relied on detailed clinical data, often gathered through sentinel surveillance networks 20 . For example, the CDC’s U.S. Outpatient Influenza-like Illness Surveillance Network (ILINet) provides information about symptom prevalence for suspected flu cases across the United States over time. While an invaluable resource, ILINet is limited to individuals seeking medical care due to its reliance on sentinel providers for data collection. Therefore, individuals who lack access to such sentinel providers or those who do not seek care will not be represented in these data. Consequently, epidemiological parameters derived from these data may not be entirely representative of the population of interest. Participatory digital surveillance systems like Flu Near You, the ZOE App, and UMD-CTIS enable broader symptom tracking by collecting data directly from the public 3 , 21 . These community-based data sources can provide complementary signals to those derived through clinical data-dependent systems like ILINet 22 . Our analysis of self-reported symptoms from UMD-CTIS demonstrates how digital health data can also be rapidly utilized to infer symptomatic shifts across populations, with the advantage of timeliness and scope beyond only those seeking care. While this application does not provide the same level of clinical confirmation as traditional studies, combining evidence from both clinical and digital participatory data sources allows for earlier response guidance while gold-standard data are collected. For instance, applying our methodology of detecting potential changes in symptomatology could help direct early public health mitigation strategies.

The COVID-19 pandemic exposed vulnerabilities in health infrastructure, particularly for LMICs that struggled to establish testing facilities 8 , needed to support real-time epidemiological parameter estimation that depends on diagnostic testing results. Leveraging the power of global participatory epidemiology in the form of digital health surveys 23 has the potential to supplement these critical testing gaps. Thus, our methods of using self-reported symptom data to understand VE and changes in symptomatology is a powerful rapid response tool, that can provide the medical community with timely insights into emerging variants. Due to our agnostic approach in defining a syndrome (i.e., all pairwise symptoms), the utility of our methods goes beyond COVID-19 and can be applied to other upper-respiratory illnesses and/or locations to support response to emerging threats.

Data availability

To access the raw data used in this manuscript, a request must be submitted to the Facebook Data for Good website: https://dataforgood.facebook.com/dfg/docs/covid-19-trends-and-impact-survey-request-for-data-access . The Global UMD-CTIS Open Data API, Microdata Repository, and contingency tables are available from The University of Maryland Social Data Science Center Global COVID-19 Trends and Impact Survey website ( https://covidmap.umd.edu ). The results of the conditional logistic regression can be found in Supplemental Data  1 and Supplemental Data  2 .

Code availability

The R and Python code used to perform the analyses in this study is available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10775701 24 .

Collie, S., Champion, J., Moultrie, H., Bekker, L.-G. & Gray, G. Effectiveness of bnt162b2 vaccine against omicron variant in South Africa. N. Engl. J. Med. 386 , 494–496 (2022).

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Andrews, N. et al. Covid-19 vaccine effectiveness against the omicron (b.1.1.529) variant. N. Engl. J. Med.   386 , 1532–1546 (2022).

Article   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Menni, C. et al. Covid-19 vaccine waning and effectiveness and side-effects of boosters: a prospective community study from the Zoe Covid study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 22 , 1002–1010 (2022).

Bitzegeio, J., Hemmers, L., Bartel, A. & Werber, D. Timely monitoring COVID-19 vaccine protection, Berlin, Germany, April 15 to December 15, 2021. Int. J. Public Health 67 , 1604633 (2022).

Batista, C. et al. The silent and dangerous inequity around access to COVID-19 testing: a call to action. EClinicalMedicine 43 , 101230 (2022).

Aziz, A. B. et al. Integrated control of COVID-19 in resource-poor countries. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 101 , 98–101 (2020).

Article   CAS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Astley, C. M. et al. Global monitoring of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic through online surveys sampled from the Facebook user base. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118 , https://www.pnas.org/content/118/51/e2111455118 (2021).

Fulcher, I. R. et al. Syndromic surveillance using monthly aggregate health systems information data: methods with application to COVID-19 in Liberia. Int. J. Epidemiol. 50 , 1091–1102 (2021).

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Eames, K. et al. Rapid assessment of influenza vaccine effectiveness: analysis of an internet-based cohort. Epidemiol. Infect. 140 , 1309–1315 (2012).

Kreuter, F. Partnering with a global platform to inform research and public policy making. Survey Res. Methods 14 , 159–163 (2020).

Google Scholar  

Hodcroft, E. B. Covariants: SARS-CoV-2 Mutations and Variants of Interest (accessed 30 March 2022). CoVariants https://covariants.org/ (2022).

Zeng, B., Gao, L., Zhou, Q., Yu, K. & Sun, F. Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med. 20 , 200 (2022).

Vihta, K.-D. et al. Omicron-associated changes in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (sars-cov-2) symptoms in the United Kingdom. Clin. Infect. Dis. 76 , e133–e141 (2022).

Peña Rodríguez, M. et al. Prevalence of symptoms, comorbidities, and reinfections in individuals infected with wild-type sars-cov-2, delta, or omicron variants: a comparative study in western Mexico. Front. Public Health 11 , 1149795 (2023).

National Institutes of Health. Clinical Spectrum of SARS-COV-2 infection (accessed 12 June 2022). National Institutes of Health https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/overview/clinical-spectrum/ (2022).

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Covid-19 After Vaccination: Possible Breakthrough Infection (accessed 12 June 2022). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/effectiveness/why-measure-effectiveness/breakthrough-cases.html (2022).

Bradley, V. C. et al. Unrepresentative big surveys significantly overestimated us vaccine uptake. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-04198-4 (2021).

Siegler, A. J. et al. Trajectory of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy over time and association of initial vaccine hesitancy with subsequent vaccination. JAMA Netw. Open 4 , e2126882–e2126882 (2021).

Aiello, A. E., Renson, A. & Zivich, P. Social media-and Internet-based disease surveillance for public health. Annu. Rev. Public Health 41 , 101 (2020).

Torner, N. et al. Influenza vaccine effectiveness assessment through sentinel virological data in three post-pandemic seasons. Hum. Vaccines Immunother. 11 , 225–230 (2014).

Article   Google Scholar  

Chunara, R., Aman, S., Smolinski, M. S. & Brownstein, J. S. Flu near you: an online self-reported influenza surveillance system in the USA. Online J. Public Health Inform. 5 , https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:31097654 (2013).

Wójcik, O., Brownstein, J., Chunara, R. & Johansson, M. Public health for the people: participatory infectious disease surveillance in the digital age. Emerg. Themes Epidemiol. 11 , 7 (2014).

Chan, A. T. & Brownstein, J. S. Putting the public back in public health—surveying symptoms of COVID-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 383 , e45 (2020).

Varrelman, T. Code from: Vaccine Effectiveness Against Emerging COVID-19 Variants using Digital Health Data https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10775701 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10775701 (2024).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a Facebook Sponsored Research Agreement (T.J.V., B.R., C.R., G.T., A.H., C.M.A., J.S.B., INB1116217). Authors report research grant funding from the Massachusetts Consortium on Pathogen Readiness (J.S.B.), the Rockefeller Foundation (J.S.B.), and the National Institutes of Health (CMA, K23 DK120899) during the conduct of the study.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Computational Epidemiology Lab, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA

Tanner J. Varrelman, Benjamin Rader, Christopher Remmel, Gaurav Tuli, Aimee R. Han, Christina M. Astley & John S. Brownstein

Department of Epidemiology, Boston University, Boston, MA, 02118, USA

Benjamin Rader

Division of Endocrinology, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, 02115, USA

Christina M. Astley

Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA

Christina M. Astley & John S. Brownstein

Broad Institute of Harvard and MIT, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

T.J.V., B.R., C.M.A., and J.B. conceived the study. T.J.V. and G.T. analyzed the data. T.J.V, B.R., C.M.A., and J.B. drafted the manuscript. T.J.V., B.R., G.T., C.R., A.H., C.M.A., and J.B. reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors approved of the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tanner J. Varrelman .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information.

Communications Medicine thanks Ifeolu David, Farrokh Habibzadeh and Nick Tsinoremas for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplemental material, description of additional supplementary files, supplemental data 1, supplemental data 2, reporting summary, rights and permissions.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Varrelman, T.J., Rader, B., Remmel, C. et al. Vaccine effectiveness against emerging COVID-19 variants using digital health data. Commun Med 4 , 81 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-024-00508-9

Download citation

Received : 07 June 2023

Accepted : 24 April 2024

Published : 06 May 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-024-00508-9

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

covid 19 vaccines research topics

Ground-breaking study reveals how COVID-19 vaccines prevent severe disease

Ground-breaking study reveals how COVID-19 vaccines prevent severe disease

A landmark study by scientists at the University of Oxford, has unveiled crucial insights into the way that COVID-19 vaccines mitigate severe illness in those who have been vaccinated.

Despite the global success of COVID-19 vaccination campaigns, concerns remain around the continued spread of this disease including in vaccinated individuals. For this reason, researchers at the Oxford Vaccine Group conducted an extensive investigation into the human immune response to COVID-19, in both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals.

Employing contemporary 'big-data' analyses, scientists can find novel associations between fundamental biological entities and indicators of the severity of a disease — to build patterns of health and disease. Results of this study categorically show a reduction in indicators of disease severity in those who had received the vaccine, demonstrating that the harmful inflammatory reaction to COVID-19 is less severe in those who have been vaccinated, when compared with those who haven’t.

Professor Daniel O'Connor , Head of Bioinformatics at the Oxford Vaccine Group (OVG), led the study. He said: 'These results confirm the efficacy of vaccination and its pivotal role in reducing the harmful consequences associated with COVID-19. The results of our research highlight the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine's ability to modulate harmful responses to the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and therefore to reduce the severity of illness. The implications of these findings are far-reaching, offering evidence that is fundamental to future vaccine development and pandemic mitigation strategies. It also provides valuable guidance for policymakers and public health experts.'

Professor Sir Andrew Pollard, Ashall Professor of Infection and Immunity and Director of the Oxford Vaccine Group, said: 'Better understanding of how vaccines can reduce the severity of infections caused by viruses like COVID-19 is a key part of our preparedness to make effective vaccines against the next pandemic threat. Ongoing research is critical as we know the next one is coming but we don’t know which virus or when it will be.'

The study employed state-of-the-art technologies, including RNA-sequencing (to capture the level of genes produced by blood cells), to achieve these results. While the findings are promising, the study acknowledges limitations such as a focus on mild cases and sample size constraints, highlighting the need for further research utilising advanced techniques to enhance resolution.

Key findings from the study include:

  • Identification of unique responses to COVID-19 among vaccinated individuals, highlighting the vaccine's influence on responses to this disease.
  • Demonstrated reduction in harmful responses associated with COVID-19 severity in recipients of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine compared with unvaccinated counterparts.
  • COVID-19 in vaccinated individuals resulted in less COVID-19-induced blood cell count changes.
  • Correlation between decreased levels of a particular class of molecules in blood (microRNAs) and elevated levels of inflammation, suggesting a regulatory role for these molecules in inflammatory responses to viral infection.

Funding for the study was provided by various organisations, including the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, and Oxford Nanopore Technologies. Notably, the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 randomised controlled trials received support from UK Research and Innovation, NIHR, Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, among others.

Link to the research paper in Nature Communications: Multi-omics analysis reveals COVID-19 vaccine induced attenuation of inflammatory responses during breakthrough disease

Subscribe to News

DISCOVER MORE

  • Support Oxford's research
  • Partner with Oxford on research
  • Study at Oxford
  • Research jobs at Oxford

You can view all news or browse by category

Numbers, Facts and Trends Shaping Your World

Read our research on:

Full Topic List

Regions & Countries

  • Publications
  • Our Methods
  • Short Reads
  • Tools & Resources

Read Our Research On:

How Americans View the Coronavirus, COVID-19 Vaccines Amid Declining Levels of Concern

Continued decline in share of u.s. adults with up-to-date vaccination, table of contents.

  • COVID-19 vaccination among adults ages 65 and older, by party
  • Views of long COVID
  • Views of the threat posed by the coronavirus
  • Personal concern about getting or spreading COVID-19
  • Uptake of the flu shot
  • Acknowledgments
  • The American Trends Panel survey methodology
  • Appendix: Detailed chart and tables

covid 19 vaccines research topics

Pew Research Center conducted this study to understand Americans’ views of the coronavirus and COVID-19 vaccines. For this analysis, we surveyed 10,133 U.S. adults from Feb. 7 to 11, 2024.

Everyone who took part in the survey is a member of the Center’s American Trends Panel (ATP), an online survey panel that is recruited through national, random sampling of residential addresses. This way, nearly all U.S. adults have a chance of selection. The survey is weighted to be representative of the U.S. adult population by gender, race, ethnicity, partisan affiliation, education and other categories. Read more about the ATP’s methodology .

Here are the questions used for this report , along with responses, and its methodology .

A new Pew Research Center survey finds that just 20% of Americans view the coronavirus as a major threat to the health of the U.S. population today and only 10% are very concerned they will get it and require hospitalization. This data represents a low ebb of public concern about the virus that reached its height in the summer and fall of 2020, when as many as two-thirds of Americans viewed COVID-19 as a major threat to public health.

Just 28% of U.S. adults say they have received the updated COVID-19 vaccine, which the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended last fall to protect against serious illness. This stands in stark contrast to the spring and summer of 2021, when long lines and limited availability characterized the initial rollout of the first COVID-19 vaccines. A majority of U.S. adults (69%) had been fully vaccinated by August 2021.

Chart shows Declining share of Americans have the most up-to-date level of protection against the coronavirus

Underscoring the limited demand for the updated COVID-19 vaccines, a larger share of U.S. adults say they’ve gotten a flu shot in the last six months than the updated coronavirus vaccine (44% vs. 28%). And despite a public health push encouraging adults to get both vaccines at the same time, almost half of those who received a flu shot from a health care provider chose not to get the updated COVID-19 vaccine.

The vast majority of Americans have some level of protection from the coronavirus because of vaccination, prior infection or a combination of the two. This has led to a decline in severe illness from the disease.

Still, the virus continues to circulate widely in the United States , with wastewater data suggesting that cases in the early part of 2024 were among the highest they have been since the first omicron wave in 2022.  

Long COVID ranks among the concerns of public health experts. Long COVID refers to a variety of symptoms such as fatigue and brain fog that last longer than a month after a COVID-19 infection.

The survey – conducted among 10,133 U.S. adults from Feb. 7 to 11, 2024 – finds that 50% of Americans say it is extremely or very important for medical researchers and health care providers to understand and treat long COVID; 27% see this as a less important issue and 22% of Americans say they haven’t heard of long COVID.

Continuity and change: Partisan views of COVID-19

Partisanship remains one of the most powerful factors shaping views about COVID-19 vaccines and the virus. But the size and nature of differences between Republicans and Democrats have evolved since earlier stages of the outbreak.

Chart shows Amid waning public concern, smaller partisan gap in views of the public health threat posed by the coronavirus

For instance, the gap between the shares of Democrats and Republicans who view the coronavirus as a major threat to public health has fallen from 37 percentage points in May 2022 to 16 points today. In the pandemic’s first year, Democrats were routinely about 40 points more likely than Republicans to view the coronavirus as a major threat to the health of the U.S. population. This gap has waned as overall levels of concern have fallen.

When it comes to vaccination, Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents remain more likely than Republicans and GOP leaners to say they’ve received an updated COVID-19 vaccine (42% vs. 15%). This 27-point gap in recent vaccination is about the same as in January 2022 when 62% of Democrats and 33% of Republicans said they were up to date (i.e., fully vaccinated and recently boosted).

In addition to partisanship, age continues to matter a great deal in attitudes and behaviors tied to the coronavirus. And the intersection of partisanship and age reveals one of the biggest recent changes in the public’s response to the outbreak: a growing divergence between the oldest Republicans and oldest Democrats in vaccine uptake, which is explored below.

Older adults continue to be one of the most at-risk groups for severe illness and death from COVID-19.

Chart shows Sharp decline in share of older Republicans who are up to date on COVID-19 vaccinations

When vaccines first became available in 2021, large majorities of both Republicans and Democrats ages 65 and older said they had received the vaccine. But as additional doses have become available, uptake among older Republicans has declined at a faster rate than among older Democrats.

In the current survey, 66% of Democrats ages 65 and older say they have received the updated COVID-19 vaccine, compared with 24% of Republicans ages 65 and older.

This 42-point partisan gap is much wider now than at other points since the start of the outbreak. For instance, in August 2021, 93% of older Democrats and 78% of older Republicans said they had received all the shots needed to be fully vaccinated (a 15-point gap). Go to the Appendix for more details .

How COVID-19 vaccination varies by age within parties

Chart shows Younger Democrats much less likely than older Democrats to have received new COVID-19 vaccine

The impact of age is also striking when looking within political parties.

Among Democrats, about three-in-ten adults under 50 have received an updated COVID-19 vaccine, compared with 48% of those ages 50 to 64 and 66% of Democrats ages 65 and older.

Age differences within the GOP run in the same direction, but are much more modest, reflecting, in part, low overall levels of vaccine uptake.

How COVID-19 vaccination varies by race and ethnicity

Similar shares of White (28%), Black (29%) and Hispanic (27%) adults say they have gotten the updated vaccine. English-speaking Asian adults (35%) are slightly more likely to report receiving the updated vaccine.

As in past Center surveys, there are racial and ethnic differences in vaccine uptake among Democrats.

For instance, 50% of White Democrats and 42% of English-speaking Asian Democrats report having received the updated vaccine, compared with somewhat smaller shares of Black and Hispanic Democrats (32% each).

Half of Americans say it is extremely or very important for medical researchers and health care providers to understand and treat long COVID, considering all the different priorities they face.

Chart shows Half of Americans say it is extremely or very important for medical professionals to address long COVID

About two-in-ten (21%) say it’s somewhat important for those in medicine to address long COVID, while 6% say it is not too or not at all important. Another 22% say they haven’t heard of long COVID.

More Democrats (61%) than Republicans (37%) say it is extremely or very important for medical researchers and health care providers to understand and treat long COVID.

A majority of women (56%) consider this extremely or very important; a smaller share of men (44%) say the same. The CDC has reported that women are more likely than men to develop long COVID symptoms.

Awareness of long COVID also shapes views on its importance: Those who have heard a lot about long COVID are more likely than those who have heard a little about it to say it’s extremely or very important for medical professional to address it (76% vs. 60%).

Chart shows 1 in 5 Americans now say the coronavirus is a major threat to public health

One-in-five Americans now say the coronavirus is a major threat to the health of the U.S. population, down from a high of 67% in July 2020.

Concern about the coronavirus as a major threat to the U.S. economy has also declined dramatically. Today, 23% of Americans say it’s a major threat to the economy, compared with 88% in May 2020. The pandemic spurred an economic recession in 2020 and a spike in unemployment that reached the highest levels since the Great Recession.

Federal policy on the coronavirus has changed as public concern – and the incidence of severe illness – has fallen. The Biden administration ended the public health emergency for the coronavirus pandemic in May 2023. And the CDC recently released updated guidelines with shorter isolation periods for adults testing positive for the disease.

While large partisan gaps characterized views of the coronavirus as a major threat to public health for much of the pandemic, those gaps were far smaller on views of the virus as a major threat to the economy. In the current survey, just a 6-point gap separates Republicans and Democrats with this view (20% vs. 26%, respectively) – similar to the 9-point party gap seen in May 2022.

About a quarter of Americans (27%) are very or somewhat concerned about getting a serious case of COVID-19 that would require hospitalization. A somewhat higher share (40%) say they are very or somewhat concerned they might spread the coronavirus to other people without knowing it.

Chart shows Long-term decline in concern about getting a serious case of COVID-19 or unknowingly spreading it

Levels of concern for getting or spreading the coronavirus are about the same as they were in March 2023 and remain down dramatically from early in the pandemic.

The share of Americans who are very or somewhat concerned about getting a serious case is 26 points lower than in November 2020, before a COVID-19 vaccine was available to the public. And the share of Americans who are at least somewhat concerned about spreading COVID-19 without knowing it is down 24 points since November 2020.

Still, the current data shows how the virus remains a concern in daily life for many Americans, more than four years after the first confirmed coronavirus cases appeared in the U.S.

Consistent with past Center surveys, there are demographic and political differences in personal concern about getting a serious case of COVID-19 and unknowingly spreading the virus:

Chart shows Democrats much more concerned than Republicans about risk of unknowingly spreading COVID-19

  • Income: Lower-income Americans continue to be particularly concerned (38%) about getting a serious case of COVID-19. They’re also more likely than middle- and upper-income Americans to worry about unknowingly spreading COVID-19, but the differences are more modest.
  • Party: Democrats (54%) are more than twice as likely as Republicans (24%) to be very or somewhat concerned about unknowingly spreading COVID-19. And they’re 16 points more likely to express concern about getting a serious case of the disease.
  • Race and ethnicity: White Americans (20%) are less likely to be concerned about getting a serious case of COVID-19 than Black (43%), Hispanic (39%) and English-speaking Asian Americans (36%).

Some of the groups most personally concerned about getting a severe case of COVID-19 are also among the groups most concerned about the public health threat from the coronavirus. For example, Black adults and adults with lower incomes express more concern about the personal health and public health impact of the coronavirus than White adults and those with upper incomes.

Chart shows Majorities of the oldest U.S. adults got a flu shot this year and say they typically get one annually

The survey finds 44% of U.S. adults say they have gotten a flu shot since August. This share is down slightly from last March, when 49% of Americans said they had recently gotten a flu shot.

Uptake varies by the following factors:

  • Age: Older Americans continue to be more likely to report getting the flu shot. Two-thirds of Americans ages 65 and older say they have gotten the flu shot since August. By comparison, only about a third of those under age 50 say the same. These large age differences are seen among both Democrats and Republicans.
  • Race and ethnicity: English-speaking Asian Americans (52%) and White Americans (48%) are more likely than Black Americans (38%) and Hispanic Americans (33%) to say they have gotten a flu shot since August. These racial and ethnic differences are consistent with past Center surveys.
  • Partisan affiliation: Democrats are more likely than Republicans to say they got a flu shot this year (53% vs. 37%). This 16-point gap is twice as big now as it was in November 2020, during the pandemic’s first year. The current partisan difference in flu shot uptake is similar to the one recorded in March 2023.

The flu shot and updated COVID-19 vaccines are both recommended to protect against severe illness, but Americans approach these vaccines differently.

Chart shows Republicans are much more likely to get the flu shot than the updated COVID-19 vaccine

Americans are more likely to report that they received a flu shot than the updated COVID-19 vaccine this year (44% vs. 28%).

This gap in uptake between the flu shot and updated COVID-19 vaccine is more pronounced among Republicans than Democrats.

Republicans are more than twice as likely to say they’ve gotten a flu shot since August as to say they’ve received an updated COVID-19 vaccine (37% vs. 15%). Among Democrats, this difference is more modest (53% vs. 42%).

Sign up for our weekly newsletter

Fresh data delivery Saturday mornings

Sign up for The Briefing

Weekly updates on the world of news & information

  • Coronavirus (COVID-19)
  • COVID-19 & Politics
  • COVID-19 & Science
  • Medicine & Health

Americans’ Trust in Scientists, Positive Views of Science Continue to Decline

Americans’ largely positive views of childhood vaccines hold steady, lack of preparedness among top reactions americans have to public health officials’ covid-19 response, about half of recent online daters in u.s. say it’s important to see covid-19 vaccination status on profiles, partisan differences are common in the lessons americans take away from covid-19, most popular, report materials.

1615 L St. NW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20036 USA (+1) 202-419-4300 | Main (+1) 202-857-8562 | Fax (+1) 202-419-4372 |  Media Inquiries

Research Topics

  • Age & Generations
  • Economy & Work
  • Family & Relationships
  • Gender & LGBTQ
  • Immigration & Migration
  • International Affairs
  • Internet & Technology
  • Methodological Research
  • News Habits & Media
  • Non-U.S. Governments
  • Other Topics
  • Politics & Policy
  • Race & Ethnicity
  • Email Newsletters

ABOUT PEW RESEARCH CENTER  Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the world. It conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, media content analysis and other empirical social science research. Pew Research Center does not take policy positions. It is a subsidiary of  The Pew Charitable Trusts .

Copyright 2024 Pew Research Center

Terms & Conditions

Privacy Policy

Cookie Settings

Reprints, Permissions & Use Policy

Vaccine Safety Publications

Cdc publications by vaccine safety system, publications about specific vaccine safety topics, covid-19 vaccine safety articles and studies by topic, cdc vaccine safety publications by year.

CDC’s Immunization Safety Office monitors the safety of licensed and authorized vaccines and conducts high-quality vaccine safety research. This research is peer-reviewed and published in reputable scientific outlets.

The vaccine safety articles and studies listed on this page include a full citation, a short summary, and a link to the free PMC article, when available.

  • Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)
  • Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD)
  • Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) Project
  • Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Vaccine Safety [PDF – 2 pages]
  • Vaccines and Autism [PDF – 2 pages]
  • Thimerosal Publications and References

An asterisk (*) denotes a newly published article added

Shimabukuro T, Nair N. Allergic Reactions Including Anaphylaxis After Receipt of the First Dose of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine   JAMA 2021 Feb 23;325(8):780-781 doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.0600.

Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine was authorized by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for emergency use in December 2020. CDC and FDA immediately began safety monitoring in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). One health outcome in particular that CDC and FDA monitored for was severe allergic reaction, or anaphylaxis. From December 14–23, 2020, 1.89 million first doses of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine were administered. The most commonly reported non-anaphylaxis allergic reactions included: rash, itchy skin, itchy and scratchy sensations in the throat, and mild respiratory symptoms. Safety monitoring identified 21 anaphylaxis reports, corresponding to an estimated rate of 11.1 cases per million doses administered; 17 (81% ) had a history of allergies or allergic reactions. No deaths from anaphylaxis were reported. CDC has guidance on the use of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and management of anaphylaxis.

Shimabukuro T, Cole M, Su JR. Reports of Anaphylaxis After Receipt of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines in the US—December 14, 2020-January 18, 2021.   JAMA 2021 Feb 12; doi:10.1001/jama.2021.1967. Epub ahead of print.

In December 2020, FDA issued Emergency Use Authorizations for two mRNA-based vaccines for prevention of COVID-19 disease: Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine (December 11) and Moderna COVID-19 vaccine (December 18). After implementation of the vaccines, cases of anaphylaxis following both vaccines were reported. Anaphylaxis is a severe, life-threatening allergic reaction that can occur after vaccination. During December 14, 2020 through January 18, 2021, over 9.9 million doses of Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine and over 7.5 million doses of Moderna vaccine were administered.  In this same time, CDC identified 66 anaphylaxis cases reported to VAERS: 47 following Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine (rate of 4.7 cases per million doses) and 19 following Moderna vaccine (rate of 2.5 cases per million doses). There were no deaths from anaphylaxis reported after either vaccine. Continued safety monitoring of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines has confirmed anaphylaxis following vaccination is a rare event.

CDC COVID-19 Response Team Allergic Reactions Including Anaphylaxis After Receipt of the First Dose of Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine— United States, December 21, 2020-January 10, 2021   MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Jan 22:70(4);125-129.

On December 18, 2020, FDA issued an Emergency Use Authorization for Moderna COVID-19 vaccine to prevent COVID-19. As of January 10, 2021, over 4 million first doses of the vaccine had been administered. Many people did not have any side effects after COVID-19 vaccination. However, some serious adverse reactions were reported, such as the life-threatening allergic reaction, anaphylaxis. From December 21, 20201 through January 10, 2021, VAERS received 108 reports following Moderna vaccine identified as possible allergic reaction, including anaphylaxis. Through case review of medical reports, 10 cases were determined to be anaphylaxis (a rate of 2.5 cases of anaphylaxis per million doses). Of the 10 cases, 9 had a history of allergies or allergic reaction, including 5 who had a history of anaphylaxis. Anaphylaxis following Moderna vaccine appears to be a rare event. CDC and FDA will continue to monitor for anaphylaxis following COVID-19 vaccines.

CDC COVID-19 Response Team Allergic Reactions Including Anaphylaxis After Receipt of the First Dose of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine — United States, December 14-23, 2020   MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Jan 15:70(2);46-51.

On December 11, 2020, FDA issued an Emergency Use Authorization for Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine to prevent COVID-19. As of December 23, 2020, over 1.8 million first doses of the vaccine had been administered. During this time, CDC and FDA were notified through multiple channels of suspected cases of anaphylaxis following vaccination. Anaphylaxis is a severe, life-threatening allergic reaction that occurs rarely after vaccination.  From December 14-23, 2020, VAERS received 175 reports identified as possible allergic reaction, including anaphylaxis. Through case review of medical reports, 21 cases were determined to be anaphylaxis (a rate of 11.1 cases of anaphylaxis per million doses). Most anaphylaxis cases (81%) occurred in persons with a history of allergies or allergic reactions. Anaphylaxis following Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine appears to be a rare event. CDC and FDA will continue to monitor for anaphylaxis following COVID-19 vaccines.

Qian L, Sy LS, Hong V, Glenn SC, Ryan DS, Nelson JC, Hambidge SJ, Crane B, Zerbo O, DeSilva MB, Glanz JM, Donahue JG, Liles E, Duffy J, Xu S. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Health Care Utilization in the Vaccine Safety Datalink: Retrospective Cohort Study . JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024 Jan 23:10:e48159. Doi:2196/48159.

Malden DE, Gee J, Glenn S, Li Z, Mercado C, Ogun OA, Kim S, Lewin BJ, Ackerson BK, Jazwa A, Weintraub ES, McNeil MM, Tartof S. Reactions following Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccination and related healthcare encounters among 7,077 children aged 5-11 years within an integrated healthcare system . Vaccine 2023 Jan 9; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.10.079. Online ahead of print.

This publication describes data from a digital survey and from electronic health records (EHRs) of children aged 5-11 years who were vaccinated with the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA COVID-19 vaccine during November 4, 2021, to February 28, 2022. Parents completed a 14-day survey on reactions their children had following vaccination. Self-reported reactions from the survey were combined with the EHRs along with information from parents or guardians who sought medical care for vaccine-related symptoms. Results showed that in most cases, symptoms following Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA COVID-19 vaccination did not require medical attention.

  Tompkins LK, Baggs J, Myers TR, Gee JM, Marquez PL, Kennedy SB, Peake D, Dua D, Hause AM, Strid P, Abara W, Rossetti R, Shimabukuro TT, Shay DK. Association between history of SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe systemic adverse events after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination among U.S. adults . Vaccine . 2022 Nov 1;S0264-410X(22)01342-1. Online ahead of print.

This study, published in December 2022, found that after receiving the first of two doses of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, patients who had previously tested positive for COVID-19 were somewhat more likely to have a severe systemic reaction to the vaccine compared to those who had not had COVID-19 previously. Though these reactions were rare, people who received the Moderna vaccine had a slightly higher risk of complications compared to participants who received the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine. The study reviewed data from patients 18 years of age and older who had received a COVID-19 vaccination within the previous seven days and registered on CDC’s V-safe. V-safe is a web-based tool that uses text messages, emails, and web surveys to provide personalized health check-ins for people after receiving a new vaccine.

Tartof SY, Malden DE, Liu ILA, Sy LS, Lewin BJ, Williams JTB, Hambidge SJ, Alpern JD, Daley MF, Nelson JC, McClure D, Zerbo O, Henninger ML, Fuller C, Weintraub E, Saydeh S, Qian L. Health Care Utilization in the 6 Months Following SARS-CoV-2 Infection . JAMA Network . 2022 Aug 12 ;5(8):e2225657. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.25657.

This August 2022 publication presents a study on healthcare use in the six months immediately following COVID-19 infection. Data from the Vaccine Safety Datalink found that COVID-19 infections led to a 4% increase in healthcare use that included a mix of virtual encounters and emergency department visits. This increase shows the potential excess strain on the healthcare system and provides insight into long-term resource planning for patients who were previously infected with COVID-19.

Twentyman E, Wallace M, Roper LE, Anderson TC, Rubis AB, Fleming-Dutra KE, Hall E, Hsu J, Rosenblum HG, Godfrey M, Archer WR, Moulia DL, Daniel L, Brooks O, Talbot HK, Lee GM, Bell BP, Daley M, Meyer S, Oliver SE. Interim Recommendation of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices for Use of the Novavax COVID-19 Vaccine in Persons Aged ≥18 years — United States, July 2022 . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep . 2022 Aug 5;71(31);988–992.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued an Emergency Use Authorization for the Novavax COVID-19 vaccine on July 13, 2022. On July 19, 2022, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) made recommendations for the use of the Novavax vaccine in adults ages 18 years and older as a primary series. Since June 2020, ACIP has reviewed data related to COVID-19 and the use of COVID-19 vaccines, including the Novavax vaccine. Data were used from a randomized double blind clinical trial based in the United States and Mexico that enrolled 29,945 participants ages 18 years and older during December 27, 2020, through September 27, 2021. Participants were given doses of either the Novavax vaccine or a saline placebo. Results showed the effectiveness of the Novavax vaccine in adults ages 18 years and older. Additional data sources from the United Kingdom, South Africa, and Australia were considered when looking at the benefits and risks of the Novavax vaccine. Novavax COVID-19 vaccine is an additional option for unvaccinated adults, increasing flexibility for the public and for vaccine providers to prevent severe COVID-19 illness.

Hause AM, Baggs J, Marquez P, Abara WE, Baumblatt J, Blanc PG, Su JR, Hugueley B, Parker C, Myers TR, Gee J, Shimabukuro TT, Shay DK. Safety Monitoring of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Second Booster Doses Among Adults Aged ≥50 Years — United States, March 29, 2022–July 10, 2022 . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep . 2022 Jul 29;71(30);971–976.

This analysis, published July 2022, reviewed vaccine safety data from V-safe and the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System after receipt of a second COVID-19 mRNA (Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna) booster dose among adults ages 50 years and older from March 29–July 10, 2022. Vaccine safety experts identified no new safety concerns following the second mRNA booster dose in this age group. Local (itching, pain, redness, and/or swelling at the injection site) and systemic (fever, headache, joint pain) reactions were observed, and serious adverse events were rare. These findings are consistent with known adverse events after receipt of first booster doses and with the existing body of evidence that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are safe.

Hause AM, Zhang B, Yue X, Marquez P, Myers TR, Parker C, Gee J, Su J, Shimabukuro TT, Shay DK. Reactogenicity of Simultaneous COVID-19 mRNA Booster and Influenza Vaccination in the US. . JAMA Netw Open . 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2222241. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.22241.

A review of vaccine safety data from September 22, 2021, through January 16, 2022, looked at reported reactions following vaccination with both influenza (flu) and an mRNA-based COVID-19 booster dose (third dose administered ≥ 5 months after second dose) during the same healthcare visit. The review found that people who received a booster and flu vaccine simultaneously were slightly more likely to report systemic reactions (i.e., headache, fatigue, and muscle pain) than people who received just the COVID-19 booster. Data were collected and reviewed from V-safe, a web-based tool that uses text messages, emails, and web surveys to provide personalized health check-ins for people after receiving a new vaccine.

Hanson KE, Goddard K, Lewis N, Fireman B, Myers TR, Bakshi N, Weintraub E, Donahue JG, Nelson JC, Xu S, Glanz JM, Williams JTB, Alpern JD, Klein NP. Incidence of Guillain-Barré Syndrome After COVID-19 Vaccination in the Vaccine Safety Datalink. . JAMA Netw Open . 2022 Apr 26; 5(4):e228879. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.8879.

Post-authorization monitoring of COVID-19 vaccines in large populations may detect rare adverse events (AEs) that were not identified during clinical trials, such as Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). This cohort study, published April 2022, was conducted to look at data from the Vaccine Safety Datalink during December 13, 2020, through November 13, 2021, to assess the risk of GBS after COVID-19 vaccination with J&J/Janssen and mRNA (Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna) vaccines. Data from 10,158,003 COVID-19 vaccine recipients who were at least aged 12 years were analyzed. The study found that cases of GBS were higher among those who received the J&J/Janssen vaccine, which is no longer used in the United States as of May 2023.

Xu S, Hong V, Sy LS, Glenn SC, Ryan DS, Morrissette KL, Nelson JC, Hambidge SJ, Crane B, Zerbo O, DeSilva MB, Glanz JM, Donahue JG, Lile E, Duffy J, Qian L. Changes in incidence rates of outcomes of interest in vaccine safety studies during the COVID-19 pandemic . Vaccine . 2022 April 18;S0264-410X922)00464-9. Online ahead of print.

The COVID-19 pandemic led to increased use of telehealth. Moving from in-person care to telehealth made it harder to identify outcomes in vaccine safety studies that are normally assessed during in-person health visits. Data from eight Vaccine Safety Datalink sites between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2020, were used to determine changes in incidence rates for 21 outcomes that are traditionally assessed in in-person settings. The study, published May 2022, found that rates of some clinical outcomes changed during the pandemic and should not be used as background rates in vaccine safety studies. Data from 2020 were split into four periods: pre- to early pandemic (January–June), middle (July–September), and later pandemic (October–December). Four corresponding time periods (ranges of months) were used for each year during 2017–2019. Results showed that incidence rates for encephalomyelitis, encephalitis/myelitis/encephalomyelitis/meningoencephalitis, and thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura cases did not change significantly during 2020. Incidence rates of acute myocardial infarction, anaphylaxis, appendicitis, convulsions/seizures, Guillain-Barré syndrome, immune thrombocytopenia (ITP), narcolepsy/cataplexy, hemorrhagic stroke, ischemic stroke, and venous thromboembolism decreased, and incidence rates of Bell’s palsy, ITP, and narcolepsy/cataplexy were higher. The higher incidence rates of these conditions suggest that telehealth visits should be considered for vaccine studies involving Bell’s palsy, ITP, and narcolepsy/cataplexy.

Kenigsberg TA, Hause AM, McNeil MM, Nelson JC, Shoup JA, Goddard K, Lou Y, Hanson KE, Glenn SC, Weintraub E. Dashboard development for near real-time visualization of COVID-19 vaccine safety surveillance data in the Vaccine Safety Datalink . Vaccine . 2022 May 1;40(22):3064-3071. Epub 2022 Apr 8.

The Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) conducts vaccine safety monitoring and vaccine safety research studies. When COVID-19 vaccinations began in the U.S. in December 2020, VSD helped with near real-time safety surveillance. Investigators developed a dashboard to show data metrics on vaccine safety. Dashboard visualizations provide situational awareness on vaccination coverage and the status of safety analysis. This May 2022 report describes the development and implementation of the COVID-19 Vaccine Dashboard, including metrics used to develop the dashboard, which may have application across various public health settings.

Rosenblum HG, Gee JM, Liu R, Marquez PL, Zhang B, Strid P, Abara WE, McNeil MM, Myers TR, Hause AM, Su JR, Baer B, Menschik D, Markowitz LE, Shimabukuro TT, Shay DK. Safety monitoring of mRNA vaccines administered during the initial 6 months of the US COVID-19 vaccination programme: an observational study of reports to Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System and v-safe Lancet Infect Dis .2022 Mar 7;S1473-3099(22)0054-8. Online ahead of print.

In December 2020, two mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were authorized for emergency use in the United States. Clinical trials showed these vaccines to be safe, and post-authorization monitoring is necessary to evaluate their safety in larger and diverse populations. VAERS and v-safe are two national systems CDC uses to monitor COVID-19 vaccine safety. During the first six months of the COVID-19 vaccination program (December 14, 2020 through June 14, 2021) over 298 million doses of mRNA vaccines were administered in the U.S. In that period, over 7.9 million people enrolled in v-safe. Local (pain, redness, swelling at injection site) and systemic (fever, fatigue, and headache) reactions were reported more frequently following dose 2 compared to dose 1. The majority of symptoms were reported as mild, peaked on day 1 following vaccination, and were short-lived. Of the 340,000 adverse event reports to VAERS, the majority (92%) were classified as non-serious (similar to the local and systemic reactions reported to v-safe); 6.6% serious, non-death; 1.3% deaths. An in-depth review of reports of death found rates of death reported to VAERS were lower than expected background rates by age group. This analysis reinforces the safety of COVID-19 vaccines.

Hause AM, Bags J, Myers TR, Su JR, Blanc PG, Girwa Baumblatt JA, Woo EJ, Gee J, Shimabukuro TT, Shay DK. Safety Monitoring of COVID-19 Vaccine Booster Doses Among Adults — United States, September 22, 2021-February 6, 2022 MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022 Feb 11;71. Early Release.

In this February 2022 report, CDC reviewed the safety of a third dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine administered ≥ 5 months after the second dose. Safety data on adults ages 18 and older from V-safe and the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System showed no unexpected patterns of adverse events and found that for people who received the same mRNA COVID-19 vaccine for dose 3 as they received for doses 1 and 2, local and systemic reactions (such as pain, fatigue, and headache) were less frequently reported after dose 3 than after dose 2. Myocarditis was rarely reported following mRNA COVID-19 vaccine dose 3.

Oliver SE, Wallace M, See I, Mbaeyi S, Godfrey M, Hadler SC, Jatlaoui TC, Twentyman E, Hughes MM, Rao AK, Fiore A, Su JR, Broder KR, Shimabukuro T, Lale A, Shay DK, Markowitz LE, Wharton M, Bell BP, Brooks O, McNally V, Lee GM, Talbot HK, Daley MF. Use of the Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) COVID-19 Vaccine: Updated Interim Recommendations from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices – United States, December 2021.   Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Jan 20;71(3):90-95.

After a thorough review of available vaccine safety and effectiveness data during an emergency meeting in December 2021, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommended preferential use of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines (Pfizer-BioNTech/Comirnaty and Moderna) over the viral vector COVID-19 vaccine (Johnson & Johnson’s Janssen) for everyone ages 18 years and older in the U.S. CDC endorsed the committee’s decision and updated its recommendations for the prevention of COVID-19, stating a preference for mRNA COVID-19 vaccines over viral vector COVID-19 vaccines, if they are available. The mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are preferred over the viral vector COVID-19 vaccine for primary and booster vaccination. Since the January 2022 publication of this report, the J&J/Janssen COVID-19 vaccine is no longer available for use in the U.S.

Moro PL, McNeil MM. Successes of the CDC monitoring systems in evaluating post-authorization safety of COVID-19 vaccines [Editorial] . Expert Rev Vaccines. 2022 Mar;21(3):284-284. Epub 2022 Jan 5.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration authorized the first two mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna, in mid-December 2020, along with the Johnson & Johnson Janssen (J&J/Janssen) vaccine at the end of February 2021, for emergency use in the United States. During pre-emergency use of these vaccines, adverse events consisted of local and systemic reactions. CDC uses three systems to monitor the safety of each of these COVID-19 vaccines in the United States: the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, V-safe, and the Vaccine Safety Datalink. In addition to monitoring the safety of COVID-19 vaccines, these systems provide early safety data for very rare and serious adverse events of anaphylaxis, TTS, myocarditis/pericarditis, and Guillain-Barre syndrome—giving updated information for healthcare providers and vaccine recipients. These are complementary systems that continue to provide critical data about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines. Since the publication of this report, the J&J/Janssen COVID-19 vaccine is no longer available for use in the United States.

Lipkind HS, Vazquez-Benitez G, DeSilva M, Vesco KK, Ackerman-Banks C, Zhu J, Boyce TG, Daley MF, Fuller CC, Getahun D, Irving SA, Jackson LA, Williams JTB, Zerbo O, McNeil MM, Olson CK, Weintraub E, Kharbanda KO. Receipt of COVID-19 Vaccine During Pregnancy and Preterm or Small-for-Gestational-Age at Birth — Eight Integrated Health Care Orgnizations, United States, December 15, 2020-July 22, 2021.   MMWR Morb Mort Wkly Rep. 2022 Jan 4:71 Early release.

Pregnant people with COVID-19 are at higher risk for severe illness and adverse birth outcomes such as pre-term and small-for-gestational-age birth, yet many remain reluctant to be vaccinated. COVID-19 vaccines are recommended for pregnant people to prevent maternal morbidity and adverse birth outcomes. This study, published January 2022, analyzed the risk for severe morbidity associated with COVID-19 in pregnancy, along with risk for pre-term birth or small-for-gestational-age at birth babies. Results show that receiving a COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy was not linked with increased risk for pre-term birth or small-for-gestational-age birth. Risk for severe morbidity associated with COVID-19 disease in pregnancy was low; however, people with symptomatic COVID-19 during pregnancy were at increased risk for intensive care admission, with a 70% increased risk for death, compared with non-pregnant people with symptomatic infections. Results confirm the recommendations and benefits of receiving the COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy.

Abara WE, Gee J, Mu Y, Deloray M, Ye T, Shay DK, Shimabukuro T. Expected Rates of Select Adverse Events following Immunization for COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Monitoring J Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 27;jiab628. Online ahead of print.

Chapin-Bardales J, Myers T, Gee J, Shay DK, Marquez P, Baggs J, Zhang B, Licata C, Shimabukuro TT. Reactogenicity within 2 weeks after mRNA COVID-19 vaccines: Findings from the CDC v-safe surveillance system.   Vaccine 2021 Nov 26;39(48):7066-7073. Epub 2021 Oct 16.

In this review of v-safe vaccine safety data, researchers analyzed surveys of people who received their mRNA vaccine from December 14, 2020, through March 14, 2021. V-safe is a vaccine safety monitoring system that uses text messages and web surveys to collect information on health impacts reported after receipt of COVID-19 vaccines. During this time period, more than 4.7 million participants received one dose of an mRNA vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna), and over 2.9 million received a second dose. Most participants reported either a local reaction at the injection site (68.5% after dose 1; 72.9% after dose 2) or a systemic reaction, such as fever, headache, muscle ache and fatigue (50.6% after dose 1; 69.5% after dose 2). Researchers found that these side effects were reported more frequently among those who received Moderna than those who received Pfizer-BioNTech. An analysis of surveys reported on day 14 after vaccination indicated that new or worsening local and systemic reactions were uncommon during the second week following both dose 1 and dose 2. CDC will continue to closely monitor the safety of COVID-19 vaccines.

Hause AM, Baggs J, Gee J, Marquez P, Myers TR, Shimabukuro TT, Shay DK. Safety Monitoring of an Additional Dose of COVID-19 Vaccine — United States, August 12-September 19, 2021   MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. epub 2021 Sep 28.

On August 12, 2021, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) expanded the Emergency Use Authorizations for Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccines to include an additional dose following the 2-dose vaccination series to those with compromised immune systems. From August 12 through September 19, over 22,000 v-safe enrollees reported an additional COVID-19 dose after completing the primary 2-dose mRNA vaccination series, most with the same vaccine. Among those who completed surveys for all 3 doses, local reactions (like pain or swelling where the shot was given) were reported slightly more after dose 3 compared with after dose 2 (79% vs. 78%), while reported systemic reactions (tiredness, headache) were slightly less common after dose 3 (74% vs. 77%). These side effects were mostly mild to moderate and short-lived. These findings did not show unexpected patterns of adverse events following an additional dose of COVID-19 vaccines. CDC will continue to monitor the safety of additional doses of COVID-19 vaccines and provide data to guide recommendations and protect the public’s health.

Klein NP, Lewis N, Goddard K, Fireman B, Zerbo Q, Hanson KE, Donahue JG, Kharbanda EO, Naleway A, Clark Nelson J, Xu S, Yih WK, Glanz JM, Williams JTB, Hambridge SJ, Lewin BJ, Shimabukuro TT, DeStefano F, Weintraub ES. Surveillance for Adverse Events After COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination   JAMA 2021 Sept 3. Doi:10.1001/jama.2021.15072.

The Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) has conducted weekly near real-time monitoring, or Rapid Cycle Analysis (RCA), of Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines since those vaccines received emergency use authorization from the Food and Drug Administration in December 2020. Between December 14, 2020 through June 25, 2021, over 11.8 million doses of mRNA were administered to 6.2 million people in the VSD network; 57% received Pfizer-BioNTech and 43% received Moderna. During that time period, VSD monitored 23 pre-specified health outcomes, including myocarditis/pericarditis and anaphylaxis. Researchers identified 34 cases of myocarditis/pericarditis in people ages 12 to 39 years; a majority (85%) were males. Among this age group, there is an increased risk of 6.3 additional myocarditis cases per million mRNA vaccinations administered in the first week following vaccination. The rate of anaphylaxis following vaccination was 4.8 cases per million doses of Pfizer-BioNTech and 5.1 per million doses of Moderna vaccination. VSD monitoring did not detect safety signals for any other pre-specified outcomes. Additional research is ongoing. Getting vaccinated remains the best way to protect against COVID-19 infection.

Rosenblum HG, Hadler SC, Moulia D, Shimabukuro TT, Su JR, Tepper NK, Ess KC, Woo EJ, Mba-Jonas A, Alimchandani M, Nair N, Klein NP, Hanson KE, Markowitz LE, Wharton M, McNally VV, Romero JR, Talbot K, Lee GM, Daley MF, Mbaeyi SA, Oliver SE. Use of COVID-19 Vaccines After Reports of Adverse Events Among Adult Recipients of Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) and mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna): Update from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices — United States, July 2021   MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Aug 10.

On July 22, 2021, CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) reviewed a benefit-risk analysis of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) following Johnson & Johnson’s Janssen (J&J/Janssen) vaccine, as well as the latest information on thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) following J&J/Janssen vaccination and myocarditis following mRNA vaccination (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines). As of June 30, 2021, about 12.6 million doses of Janssen vaccine had been administered and 141 million 2nd mRNA vaccine doses had been administered. Overall, there were 7.8 cases of GBS per million J&J/Janssen doses; 3 cases of TTS per million J&J/Janssen doses and 3.5 cases of myocarditis per million 2nd mRNA vaccine doses. After assessing the data, ACIP concluded that the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination in preventing COVID-19 illness, associated hospitalizations, ICU admissions, and death outweigh serious but rare risks of GBS, TTS, and myocarditis.

Pingali C, Meghani M, Razzaghi H, , Lamias MJ, Weintraub E, Kenigsberg TA, Klein NP, Lewis N, Fireman B, Zerbo O, Bartlett J, Goddard K, Donahue J, Hanson K, Naleway A, Kharbanda EO, Yih K, Clark Nelson J, Lewin BJ, Williams JTB, Glanz JM, Singletom JA, Patel SA. COVID-19 Vaccination Coverage Among Insured Persons Aged ≥ 16 years, by Race/Ethnicity and Other Selected Characteristics — Eight Integrated Health Care Organizations, United States, December 14, 2020-May 15, 2021 . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Jul 16;70(28):985-990.

Data has shown that non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic people have experienced higher COVID-19–associated deaths and serious outcomes; however, COVID-19 vaccination coverage has been lower in these groups. To look into these disparities further, researchers from CDC analyzed data collected from the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) from December 14, 2020, through May 15, 2021. During that time, over 9.6 million people ages 16 years and older were enrolled in the VSD; 48.3% of the population had received at least one vaccine dose and 38.3% were considered fully vaccinated. In non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic populations, only 40.7% and 41.1% had received at least one COVID-19 vaccine dose, respectively. By comparison, non-Hispanic White people and non-Hispanic Asian people had higher coverage rates (54.6% and 57.4%, respectively). CDC will continue its ongoing efforts to improve vaccination coverage in all populations, especially among populations that are most greatly affected by COVID-19.

Gubernot D, Jazwa A, Niu M, Baumblatt J, Gee J, Moro P, Duffy J, Harrington T, McNeil MM, Broder K, Su J, Kamidani S, Olson CK, Panagiotakopoulos L, Shimabukuro T, Forshee R, Anderson S, Bennet S. U.S. Population-Based background incidence rates of medical conditions for use in safety assessment of COVID-19 vaccines   Vaccine 2021 Jun 23;39(28):3666-3677. Epub 2021 May 14.

The COVID-19 vaccination campaign is the largest international collaboration of modern times. One aspect of vaccination campaigns that needs consideration is possible side effects or adverse events following vaccination. Serious health outcomes linked to vaccinations are rare, and some outcomes may occur incidentally in the vaccinated population. In this large-scale compilation of U.S. background rates for medical conditions, researchers reviewed scientific literature and calculated the background rates of specific medical conditions that are generally monitored following vaccination. For COVID-19 vaccine safety surveillance, experts at CDC and the Food and Drug Administration assembled a list of 22 potential adverse events that could be monitored following COVID-19 vaccination, including neurological, autoimmune, and cardiovascular conditions, and compiled estimates of the U.S. background rates through scientific literature review gathered from PubMed and other publicly available data. These rates may be useful for future studies that assess adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination.

Hause AM, Gee J, Johnson T, Jazwa A, Marquez P, Miller E, Su J, Shimabukuro TT, Shay DK. Anxiety-Related Adverse Event Cluster After Janssen COVID-19 Vaccination — Five U.S. Mass Vaccination Sites, April 2021   MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 April 20. Epub ahead of print.

From April 7-9, 2021, 5 weeks after the J&J/Janssen COVID-19 vaccine was authorized by FDA for emergency use, clusters of anxiety-related events after Janssen vaccination were reported to CDC. The reports came from 5 mass vaccination sites in different states; 4 closed temporarily to investigate the cases. Of the 8,624 Janssen vaccine recipients, there were 64 reports of anxiety-related events, including 17 reports of fainting. Commonly reported symptoms were light-headedness/dizziness (56%), excessive sweating (31%), fainting (27%), nausea or vomiting (25%) and low blood pressure (16%). Additionally, CDC reviewed all reports to VAERS of fainting after Janssen vaccine between March 2 through April 11, 2021 and identified 653 reports out of 8 million doses administered. Review of reports found that fainting occurs in 8 per 100,000 doses administered. Vaccine providers should observe individuals for 15 minutes after COVID-19 vaccination for signs of immediate anxiety-related reactions or fainting.

Shay DK, Gee J, Su JR, Myers TR, Marquez P, Liu R, Zhang B, Licata C, Clark TA, Shimabukuro TT. Safety Monitoring of the Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) COVID-19 Vaccine — United States, March-April 2021 . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 April 30. Epub ahead of print.

Johnson & Johnson’s Janssen COVID-19 vaccine was authorized by FDA for emergency use on February 27, 2021. By April 21, nearly 8 million doses of the Janssen COVID-19 vaccine had been administered. CDC researchers reviewed safety monitoring data from VAERS and the v-safe after-vaccination health checker, and found 97% of reported reactions after vaccination, such as headache, fever, chills, injection site pain, and fatigue, were nonserious and consistent with clinical trials data. CDC and FDA issued a pause of the Janssen vaccine April 12–23, 2021, after 6 cases of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST), a serious condition that involves blood clots in the brain, were identified in VAERS. By April 25, a total of 17 thrombotic (blood clots) events with thrombocytopenia (low platelet counts) were reported to VAERS, including 3 thrombotic events not occurring in the brain. CDC and FDA continue to monitor the safety of COVID-19 vaccines, analyzing the risks and benefits of continued use.

Shimabukuro TT, Kim SY, Myers TR, Moro PL, Oduyebo T, Panagiotakopoulos L, Marquez PL, Olson CK, Liu T, Chang KT, Ellington SR, Burke VK, Smoots AN, Green CJ, Licata C, Zhang BC, Alimchandani M, Mba-Jonas A, Martin SW, Gee JM, Meaney-Delman DM. Preliminary Findings of mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons   N Engl J Med 2021 April 21. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2104983 Epub ahead of print.

Pregnant people were not included in the messenger RNA (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials. Because of the increased risk of severe illness from COVID-19, CDC has provided guidance to pregnant people who may want to get a COVID-19 vaccine. The safety of mRNA vaccines in pregnant people is monitored through 3 systems: v-safe after vaccination health checker, the v-safe pregnancy registry and VAERS. From December 14, 2020 through February 28, 2021, 35,691 v-safe participants ages 16 to 54 identified as pregnant. Injection site pain was commonly reported. Of those, 3,958 enrolled in the v-safe pregnancy registry: 827 completed pregnancy; 712 (86.1%) had live births, with most vaccinations completed in the 3rd trimester. In the VAERS reports following mRNA vaccinations, 155 (70.1%) were nonpregnancy specific; 66 (29.9%) were pregnancy and neonatal specific events. The analysis of v-safe and VAERS data did not show any safety concerns among pregnant persons who received mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.

Chapin-Bardales J, Gee J, Myers T. Reactogenicity Following Receipt of mRNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccines   JAMA Insights 2021 April 5. doi:10.1001/jama.2021.5374 Epub ahead of print.

CDC created v-safe, a smartphone-based tool, to monitor in near-real time the safety of COVID-19 vaccines authorized by FDA for emergency use. V-safe uses text messaging and web surveys to provide personalized health check-ins after COVID-19 vaccination. Researchers reviewed data collected from v-safe from December 14, 2020 to February 28, 2021, including side effects and reactions to the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. Over 3.6 million v-safe participants completed at least one health check-in after the first dose and over 1.9 million after the second dose. Injection site pain was commonly reported after first (70%) and second doses (75%) of either mRNA vaccine. Systemic reactions, such as fatigue, headache, muscle pain, chills, fever, and joint pain were the top symptoms reported by participants after the first mRNA vaccine dose. These reports increased substantially after the second dose among both mRNA vaccines. People aged 65 years and older reported fewer reactions than younger people. While v-safe is voluntary and includes less than 10% of people vaccinated, reported reactions to the mRNA vaccines were consistent with results observed in clinical trials.

Gee J, Marquez P, Su J, Calvert GM, Liu R, Myers T, Nair N, Martin S, Clark T, Markowitz L, Lindsey N, Zhang B, Licata C, Jazwa A, Sotir M, Shimabukuro T. First Month of COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Monitoring — United States, December 14, 2020-January 13, 2021   MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Feb 26;70;283-288.

The U.S. FDA authorized two COVID-19 vaccines for emergency use in December 2020: Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna. During clinical trials, there were reports of local reactions where the shot was given, and systemic reactions affecting other parts of the body. Safety monitoring for these vaccines has been the most intense and comprehensive in U.S. history. From December 14, 2020 through January 13, 2021, almost 14 million vaccine doses were distributed. During that time, over 1.6 million vaccine recipients enrolled in v-safe, and VAERS received 6,994 reports of adverse events following vaccination.  About 91% of VAERS reports were non-serious; commonly reported symptoms included headache (22.4%), fatigue (16.5%) and dizziness (16.5%). V-safe enrollees reported similar local and systemic reactions. While deaths were reported to VAERS, available documentation did not suggest a causal link between the vaccine and death. Overall, no unusual or unexpected reporting patterns were detected.

Malden DE, Gee J, Glenn S, Li Z, Mercado C, Ogun OA, Kim S, Lewin BJ, Ackerson BK, Jazwa A, Weintraub ES, McNeil MM, Tartof S. Reactions following Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccination and related healthcare encounters among 7,077 children aged 5-11 years within an integrated healthcare system .  Vaccine. 2023 Jan 9; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.10.079. Online ahead of print.

Xu S, Huang R, Sy LS, Hong V, Glenn SC, Ryan DS, Morrissette K, Vazquez-Benitez G, Glanz JM, Klein NP, Fireman B, McClure D, Liles EG, Weintraub ES, Tseng HF, Qian L. A Safety Study Evaluating non-COVID-19 Mortality Risk Following COVID-19 Vaccination . Vaccine . 2022 Dec 20; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.12.036 Online ahead of print.

A study evaluating the risk of non-COVID-19 mortality after COVID-19 vaccination found that for each vaccine and across age, sex, and race/ethnicity groups, COVID-19 mortality rates were lower among those vaccinated compared to people who were unvaccinated. The study, published December 2022, used data from seven Vaccine Safety Datalink sites from December 14, 2020, through August 31, 2021. Three separate analyses were conducted for each of the three COVID-19 vaccines used in the United States.

Xu S, Huang R, Sy LS, Glenn SC, Ryan DS, Morrissette K, Shay DS, Vazquez-Benitez G, Glanz JM, Klein NP, McClure D, Liles EG, Weintraub ES, Tseng HF, Qian L. COVID-19 Vaccination and Non-COVID-19 Mortality Risk — Seven Integrated Health Care Organizations, United States, December 14, 2020-July 31, 2021   MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. epub 2021 Oct 22.

Since COVID-19 vaccinations have become available in December 2020, an estimated 182 million people in the United States were fully vaccinated against COVID-19 by September 21, 2021. However, since April 2021, the number of people starting to get COVID-19 vaccines has decreased. People have cited vaccine safety concerns as deterrents to getting a COVID-19 vaccine, concerns that include deaths following COVID-19 vaccination. Although deaths after COVID-19 vaccination have been reported to VAERS, there have been few studies done to evaluate the mortality not associated with COVID-19 among vaccinated and unvaccinated groups. To analyze this, researchers conducted a study using the Vaccine Safety Datalink, comparing those who received COVID-19 vaccines and those who did not between December 2020 through July 2021. This study included data from 11 million people; 6.4 million received either Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna or Janssen COVID-19 vaccine and 4.6 were unvaccinated. The analysis showed that those who received COVID-19 vaccinations had lower rates of mortality for non-COVID-19 causes than those unvaccinated. These findings provide evidence that COVID-19 vaccines are safe and support current vaccination recommendations.

Cortese MM, Taylor AW, Akinbami LJ, Thames-Allen A, Yousaf AR, Campbell AP, Maloney SA, Harrington TA, Anyalechi EG, Munshi D, Kamidani S, Curtis CR, McCormick DW, Staat MA, Edwards KM, Creech CB, Museru O, Marquez P, Thompson D, Su JR, Schlaudecker EP, Broder KR. Surveillance For Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in US Children Aged 5-11 Years Who Received Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, November 2021 through March 2022 . J Infect Dis . 2023 Feb 23;jiad051. Online ahead of print.

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) is a rare but serious condition associated with SARS-CoV-2 (the virus that causes COVID-19). MIS-C leads to inflammation of different body parts including the heart, lungs, kidneys, brain, skin, eyes, or gastrointestinal tract. In rare cases, MIS-C has been observed after COVID-19 vaccination. Reporting cases of MIS-C following COVID-19 vaccination is required as part of vaccine safety monitoring in the United States. This February 2023 publication, covering a period when about 7 million children received a COVID-19 vaccine, identified 58 children with MIS-C who also showed evidence of past or recent SARS-CoV-2 infection, along with 4 children with MIS-C who did not show evidence of past or recent SARS-CoV-2 infection. The data collected showed that MIS-C illness in children after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine is rare.

Haq K, Anyalechi EG, Schlaudecker EP, McKay R, Kamidani S, Manos C, Oster ME. Multiple MIS-C Readmissions and Giant Coronary Aneurysm After COVID-19 Illness and Vaccination: A Case Report . The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal . 2022 Dec 16; DOI: 10.1097/INF.0000000000003801. Online ahead of print.

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) rarely involves delayed giant coronary aneurysms, hospital readmissions, or symptom occurrence after COVID-19 vaccination. In this case report, the authors describe a child with all 3 of these unusual features. The authors discuss his clinical presentation and medical management, review the current literature, and review CDC guidance recommendations regarding further vaccinations. A 5-year-old boy began to show symptoms of MIS-C 55 days after COVID-19 illness and 15 days after receiving the first COVID-19 vaccine dose. This is the only reported case of a patient admitted to the hospital three times for MIS-C complications after COVID-19 vaccination. Whether the child’s MIS-C complications were related to his receiving a COVID-19 vaccine after having COVID-19 illness remains unknown. After consultation with the CDC-funded Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment Project, the patient’s care team decided against further COVID-19 vaccination until at least three months after normalization of inflammatory markers.

Yousaf AR, Cortese MM, Taylor AW, Broder KR, Oster ME, Wong JM, Guh AY, McCormick DW, Kamidani S, Schlaudecker EP, Edwards K, Creech CB, Staat MA, Belay ED, Marquez P, Su JR, Salzman MB, Thompson D, Campbell AP, MIS-C Investigation Authorship Group. Reported cases of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children aged 12-20 years in the USA who received a COVID-19 vaccine, December, 2020, through August, 2021: a surveillance investigation . Lancet Child Adolesc Health . 2022 May;6(5):303-312. Epub 2022 Feb 23.

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C), a condition in children where the heart, liver, kidneys, or other organs of the body become inflamed, is a rare but serious complication of COVID-19 disease in people ages less than 21 years. Because this inflammatory illness occurs after COVID-19 infection, scientists wondered if this same type of inflammatory illness might occur after COVID-19 vaccination. In this report, published May 2022, investigators found that reported cases of MIS-C occurring at some point during the surveillance period after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine were rare; they identified 21 cases in people ages 12–20 years during a period when more than 21 million people these ages had received at least one vaccine dose. Most of the people who developed MIS-C also had laboratory evidence showing past or recent COVID-19 infection. Whether COVID-19 vaccination contributed in any way to them developing MIS-C remains unknown. CDC will continue to monitor reports of MIS-C and report findings, particularly in children and adolescents now authorized to receive the COVID-19 vaccine.

Belay ED, Godfred Cato S, Rao AK, Abrams J, Wilson WW, Lim S, Newton-Cheh C, Melgar M, DeCuir J, Webb B, Marquez P, Su JR, Meng L, Grome HN, Schlaudecker E, Talaat K, Edwards K, Barnett E, Campbell AP, Broder KR, Bamrah Morris S. Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Adults after SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination .  Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Nov 28;cia963. Online ahead of print.

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in adults (MIS-A) is a rare but serious complication of COVID-19 disease. Because of the association with COVID-19 illness, MIS-A was included in the list of adverse events to monitor following COVID-19 vaccination. Researchers reviewed reports of MIS-A from December 14, 2020, to April 30, 2021. These MIS-A reports came from different sources, including treating clinicians, state health departments and as well as the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). During the analysis period, there were 20 patients who met the CDC case definition for MIS-A. All 20 patients had confirmed past or current COVID-19 infection. Most patients reported gastrointestinal and cardiac issues, low blood pressure, and shock. Seven patients received a COVID-19 vaccine before MIS-A onset, typically 10 days before MIS-A symptoms began; 3 patients received a second COVID-19 vaccine dose 4, 17, and 22 days before MIS-A onset. All vaccinated patients had underlying COVID-19 infection prior to MIS-A onset. MIS-A has not been reported following vaccination alone. Clinicians should report suspected MIS-A cases following COVID-19 vaccination to VAERS.

Goddard K, Hanson KE, Lewis N, Weintraub E, Fireman B, Klein NP. Incidence of Myocarditis/Pericarditis Following mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination Among Children and Younger Adults in the United States. . Annals of Internal Medicine. 2022 Oct 4. doi.org/10.7326/M22-2274.

Vaccine safety monitoring systems have reported cases of myocarditis and pericarditis after mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccination, especially among younger males 0 to 7 days after receiving the second vaccine dose. Using data from the Vaccine Safety Datalink, a population-based surveillance study was conducted on pre-specified outcomes after COVID-19 vaccination among people ages 5 to 39 years. Researchers identified potential cases of myocarditis and pericarditis in emergency department and inpatient settings 1 to 98 days after vaccination and validated initial findings by reviewing medical records. Results found that during December 14, 2020, through May 31, 2022 (among people ages 18–39 years), and through August 20, 2022 (among people ages 5–17 years), there were 320 potential cases of myocarditis or pericarditis after 6,992,340 people were vaccinated. Of 320 potential cases, 224 cases were verified, with 137 cases of myocarditis or pericarditis occurring 0 to 7 days after vaccination: 18 cases after the first dose and 119 cases after the second dose. Adolescent males were shown to have higher incidence of myocarditis and pericarditis. Given the known risk of complications after COVID-19 disease (including myocarditis), the findings of this study support that the benefits of mRNA vaccination outweigh the risks.

Kracalik I, Oster ME, Broder KR, Cortese MM, Glover M, Shields K, Creech CB, Romanson B, Novosad S, Soslow J, Walter EB, Marquez P, Dendy JM, Woo J, Valderrama AL, Ramirez-Cardenas A, Assefa A, Campbell MJ, Su JR, Magill SS, Shay DK, Shimabukuro TT, Basavaraju SV. Outcomes at least 90 days onset of myocarditis after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in adolescents and young adults in the USA: a follow-up surveillance study . Lancet Child Adolesc Health . 2022 Nov 6;6(11):788-798. Epub 2022 Sept 22.

CDC collected data on individuals with myocarditis after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination through follow-up surveys of people ages 12–29 years for whom a report of myocarditis after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination was made to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) during December 2020 through November 2021. Clinical outcomes and quality of life at least 90 days since onset of myocarditis after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in adolescents and young adults were assessed. This study, published November 2022, found that approximately 80% of patients diagnosed with myocarditis after receiving an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine were considered recovered by healthcare providers at least 90 days after the onset of myocarditis. CDC is continuing to follow up with patients who have not been considered recovered since myocarditis symptom onset to better understand longer-term outcomes.

Goddard K, Lewis N, Fireman B, Weintraub E, Shimabukuro T, Zerbo O, Boyce TG, Oster ME, Hanson KE, Donahue JG, Ross P, Naleway A, Nelson JC, Lewin B, Glanz JM, Williams JTB, Kharbanda EO, Yih WK, Klein NP. Risk of myocarditis and pericarditis following BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccination . Vaccine 2022 Aug 19; 40(35):5153-5159. Epub 2022 Jul 12.

Evidence indicates that mRNA COVID-19 vaccination is associated with the risk of myocarditis and possibly pericarditis, especially among adolescent and young adult males. It is unclear if risk differs between mRNA-1273 (Moderna) and BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech). This study, published August 2022, reviewed health records among a diverse population to see if there is a clear difference in risk of myocarditis associated with receiving an mRNA-1273 versus BNT162b2 vaccine. During December 14, 2020, through January 15, 2022, 41 cases of myocarditis and pericarditis were reported after 2,891,498 doses of BNT162b2, and 38 cases of myocarditis and pericarditis were reported after 1,803,267 doses of mRNA-1273. Cases had similar demographic and clinical characteristics. In most cases, patients were hospitalized for one day or less; none required intensive care. Risk of myocarditis and pericarditis was higher after mRNA-1273 vaccine than after BNT162b2 vaccine during the 0–7 days after receiving either vaccine. Both vaccines were associated with increased risk of myocarditis and pericarditis among young males ages 18–39 years.

Weintraub ES, Oster ME, Klein NP. Myocarditis or Pericarditis Following mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination . JAMA 2022 Jun 24; 5(6):e2218512. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.18512

This commentary, published June 2022, discusses a study presenting evidence that a longer time interval between dose 1 and dose 2 of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine might lower the risk of myocarditis or pericarditis. The commentary also includes data from the Vaccine Safety Datalink, including reported rates of myocarditis or pericarditis after receiving an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (Moderna or Pfizer-BioNTech). Reported rates of myocarditis or pericarditis were higher after receipt of the Moderna vaccine than the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine and were higher following dose 2. Vaccine safety monitoring has been ongoing globally, and the risk of myocarditis appears highest among adolescents and young adult males following dose 2 of the primary series. However, the risk of myocarditis after COVID-19 disease remains greater than after COVID-19 vaccination, which remains the most effective way to prevent serious complications from COVID-19 infection.

Block JP, Boehmer TK, Forrest CB, Carton TW, Lee GM, Ajani UA, Christakis DA, Cowell LG, Draper C, Ghildayal N, Harris AM, Kappelman MD, Ko JY, Mayer KH, Nagavedu K, Oster ME, Paranjape A, Puro J, Ritchey MD, Shay DK, Thacker D, Gundlapalli AV. Cardiac Complications After SARS-CoV-2 Infection and mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination — PCORnet, United States, January 2021–January 2022 . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Apr 8; 71(14);517-523.

Data from 40 U.S. healthcare systems participating in PCORnet, the National Patient-Centered Research Network, were analyzed to identify people ages 5 years and older who developed heart complications after COVID-19 disease or after getting an mRNA COVID-19 vaccination during January 1, 2021, through January 31, 2022. The risk for heart complications after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination was highest among teen boys ages 12–17 years and young men ages 18–29 years after getting the second dose of vaccine. However, the risk of heart complications was higher after COVID-19 disease than after a second dose of vaccine—specifically, 2 to 6 times as high for teen boys and 7 to 8 times as high for young men. These findings support the continued use of recommended mRNA COVID-19 vaccines among all eligible people ages 5 years and older.

Oster ME, Shay DK, Su JR, Gee J, Creech CB, Broder KR, Edwards K, Soslow JH, Dendy JM, Schlaudecker E, Lang SM, Barnett ED, Ruberg FL, Smith MJ, Campbell MJ, Lopes RD, Sperling LS, Baumblatt JA, Thompson DL, Marquez PL, Strid P, Woo J, Pugsley R, Reagan-Steiner S, DeStefano F, Shimabukuro TT. Myocarditis Cases Reported After mRNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccination in the US From December 2020 to August 2021 . JAMA 2022 Jan 25; 327(4):331-34. Online ahead of print.

A review of vaccine safety data reported during December 2020–August 2021 found that there was a small but increased risk for myocarditis, or inflammation of the heart muscle, following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna). After a review of reports submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, scientists found that the risk of myocarditis was highest following receipt of the second vaccine dose among adolescent and young adult males. This risk should be considered within the context of the significant benefits of COVID-19 vaccination in preventing COVID-19 infection and potential serious complications from COVID-19. The benefits of COVID-19 vaccination continue to outweigh any potential risks, including myocarditis.

Paddock CD, Reagan-Steiner S, Su JR, Oster ME, Martines RB, Bhatnagar J, Shimabukuro TT. Autopsy Histopathologic Cardiac Findings in Two Adolescents Following the Second COVID-19 Vaccine Dose . Arch Pathol Lab Med 2022 Apr 11. Doi: 10.5858/arpa.2022-0084-LE. Online ahead of print.

This letter to the editor, published April 2022, responds to a report describing an investigation of autopsy findings for two adolescents who died after COVID-19 vaccination. The letter to the editor points out that the authors of the original manuscript omitted key findings by CDC. Investigation by CDC found evidence that death was related to C septicum sepsis. C septicum sepsis is a fatal infection that can present with non-specific signs and symptoms. C septicum sepsis is lethal in 60–70% of cases, and death typically occurs within 12–48 hours of symptoms. Information reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System showed that the patients described flu-like symptoms for two days before death. The original investigation, by omitting CDC’s additional findings, could be interpreted as evidence that the COVID-19 vaccine was the cause of death.

Oster ME, Shay DK, Su JR, Gee J, Creech B, Broder KR, Edwards K, Soslow JH, Dendy JM, Schlaudecker E, Lang SM, Barnett ED, Ruberg FL, Smith MJ, Campbell MJ, Lopes RD, Sperling LS, Baumblatt JA, Thompson DL, Marquez PL, Strid P, Woo J, Puglsey R, Reagan-Steiner S, DeStefano F, Shimabukuro TT. Myocarditis Cases Reported After mRNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccination in the US from December 2020 to August 2021   JAMA. 2022 Jan 18;327(4):331-340. Online ahead of print.

Since mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines were authorized for emergency use in December 2020, there have been reports of myocarditis, or inflammation of the heart muscle, following vaccination. To see if there was an association between mRNA COVID-19 vaccination and myocarditis, researchers reviewed reports submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting Systems (VAERS) from December 2020 through August 31, 2021. In that time, more than 192 million people ages 12 years and older have received at least one dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. From this population, VAERS received 1,626 myocarditis reports that met case definition. The review found the rates myocarditis were highest following the second dose of mRNA vaccine among adolescent and young adult males. Myocarditis is a rare but serious adverse event that can occur following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. The benefits of COVID-19 vaccination continue to outweigh any potential risks, including myocarditis.

Gargano JW, Wallace M, Hadler SC, Langley G, Su JR, Oster ME, Broder KR, Gee J, Weintraub E, Shimabukuro T, Scobie HM, Moulia D, Markowitz LE, Wharton M, McNally VV, Romero JR, Keipp Talbot H, Lee GM, Daley MF, Oliver SE. Use of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine After Reports of Myocarditis Among Vaccine Recipients: Update from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices — United States, June 2021   MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Jul 9;70:977-982.

Two mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were given emergency use authorization (EUA) by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in December 2020: Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines. Pfizer-BioNTech was authorized for individuals 16 years and older, and Moderna for adults 18 years and older. In May 2021, FDA expanded Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine’s authorization to include adolescents aged 12 to 15 years. After reported myocarditis/pericarditis among mRNA vaccine recipients, mostly in younger males after the 2nd dose, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) held a meeting to review these reports and conduct a risk-benefit assessment of mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in the U.S. Evidence presented showed that the highest rates of myocarditis were reported in males aged 12-17 and 18-24 (62.8 and 50.5 reported cases of myocarditis per million 2nd mRNA doses administered, respectively). On June 23, after reviewing all the available information, ACIP determined that the benefits of mRNA COVID-19 vaccination under EUA outweighed the risks of myocarditis in all populations. CDC and FDA will continue to monitor cases of myocarditis among mRNA COVID-19 vaccine recipients.

Shay DK, Shimabukuro, TT, DeStefano F. Myocarditis Occurring After Immunization with mRNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccines: Editorial .  JAMA Cardiol. Published online June 29, 2021. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2021.2821.

CDC researchers reviewed several case reports of acute myocarditis occurring in people following mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccinations (Pfizer BioNTech or Moderna). The first report included 4 cases of myocarditis developed 1 to 5 days after getting dose 2 of mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine. Second report included 23 cases of acute myocarditis within 4 days of vaccination, mostly after dose 2. The last report included 7 cases in adolescents, ages 14-19. All presented with myocarditis or myopericarditis (heart muscle and lining inflammation) within 4 days of dose 2. The review of these cases showed clinical similarities and there were no other known causes for their acute myocarditis, suggesting a likely association with vaccination. Myocarditis following COVID-19 vaccination is rare. Researchers will continue to look into myocarditis following COVID-19 vaccination.

Goddard K, Donahue JG, Lewis N, Hanson KE, Weintraub ES, Fireman B, Klein NP. Safety of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination Among Young Children in the Vaccine Safety Datalink . Pediatrics . 2023 Jun 6. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2023-061894

This June 2023 publication shares results of an examination of medical records of 120,006 children aged 6 months to 5 years within the Vaccine Safety Datalink population who received at least one dose of an mRNA (Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna) COVID-19 vaccine from June 18, 2022–January 28, 2023, for 23 serious potential health outcomes, including blood clots, seizures, stroke, and brain inflammation. Analyses showed no safety concern for any of the selected serious outcomes. In particular, the evaluation found no concern for seizures after vaccination, something occasionally seen following other routine childhood immunizations in children under 2 years old. Safety monitoring of nearly a quarter million monovalent COVID-19 mRNA vaccine doses given to children aged 6 months to 5 years over a 7-month period showed no increased occurrence of serious negative health outcomes, including no cases of myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) or pericarditis (inflammation of the lining of the heart). The examination’s findings reinforce the safety of COVID-19 vaccination of young children.

Goddard K, Hanson KE, Lewis N, Weintraub E, Fireman B, Klein NP. Incidence of Myocarditis/Pericarditis Following mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination Among Children and Younger Adults in the United States . Annals of Internal Medicine. 2022 Oct 4. doi.org/10.7326/M22-2274.

Hause AM, Marquez P, Zhang B, Myers TR, Gee J, Su JR, Parker C, Thompson D, Panchanathan SS, Shimabukuro TT, Shay DK. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Safety Among Children Aged 6 Months–5 Years — United States, June 18, 2022–August 21, 2022 . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Sep 2;71(35);1115-1120.

This study, published September 2022, found that among children ages 6 months to 5 years who received mRNA COVID-19 vaccines, local and systemic reactions were mostly mild or moderate. Serious reports of adverse events were rare. Safety data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System and V-safe were used to look at reported reactions in this age group. Most reported reactions—such as injection site pain, irritability, crying, and sleepiness—were consistent with those observed during the vaccines’ preauthorization clinical trials. This study reinforces the safety profile of mRNA COVID-19 vaccination among children in this age group.

Hause AM, Baggs J, Marquez P, Abara WE, Baumblatt JG, Thompson D, Su JR, Myers TR, Gee J, Shimabukuro TT, Shay DK. Safety Monitoring of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Booster Doses Among Children Aged 5–11 Years — United States, May 17–July 31, 2022 . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Aug 19;71(33);1047–1051.

A CDC study published August 2022 found that among children ages 5–11 years who received a booster dose of Pfizer-BioNTech’s mRNA COVID-19 vaccine (third dose administered ≥5 months after the second dose), serious reports of adverse events were rare. Data from V-safe and the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System were used to look at adverse events reported in this age group. Data showed children that received a third dose had similar adverse events to those reported after receiving a first or second dose. Most reported adverse events—such as injection site pain and headache—were considered mild. The findings are consistent with those observed during the vaccine’s clinical trial and reinforces the safety of mRNA COVID-19 booster dose vaccination among children ages 5–11 years.

Hause AM, Baggs J, Marquez P, Abara WE, Baumblatt JG, Thompson D, Su JR, Myers TR, Gee J, Shimabukuro TT, Shay DK. Safety Monitoring of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine First Booster Doses Among Persons Aged ≥12 Years with Presumed Immunocompromise Status — United States, January 12, 2022–March 28, 2022 . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Jul 15; 71(28);899–903.

Immunocompromised people are at risk for severe COVID-19 disease, and additional doses of COVID-19 vaccine are recommended for this population. To characterize the safety of first booster doses among immunocompromised persons ages 12 years and older, CDC reviewed adverse events (AEs) reported to V-safe and the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) during the week after receipt of an mRNA COVID-19 first booster dose (fourth dose administered ≥ 3 months after the third) during January 12, 2022–March 28, 2022. Safety data identified no unusual or unexpected patterns of AEs. Mild to moderate reactions, such as injection site pain, fatigue, headache, and muscle pain following a booster dose were similar to those among non-immunocompromised people. Local and systemic reactions were less common following dose 4 compared to dose 3. These findings support evidence that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are safe for immunocompromised people.

Fleming-Dutra KE, Wallace M, Moulia DL, Twentyman E, Roper LE, Hall E, Link-Gelles R, Godfrey M, Woodworth KR, Anderson TC, Rubis AB, Shanley E III, Jones JM, Morgan RL, Brooks O, Talbot HK, Lee GM, Bell BP, Daley M, Meyer S, Oliver SE. Interim Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices for Use of Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccines in Children Aged 6 Months–5 Years — United States, June 2022 . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Jul 1; 71(26);859–868.

Vaccination remains the best protection against COVID-19-related hospitalization and death. On June 17, 2022, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted Emergency Use Authorization for the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine for children ages 6 months–5 years and for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine for children ages 6 months–4 years. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) determined that the benefits of vaccination for these age groups outweigh the risks. To guide recommendations on the use of vaccines, ACIP used the Evidence to Recommendation Framework. The framework considered the importance of COVID-19 as a public health problem, the benefits and risks of using each vaccine, and parents’ values regarding the use of vaccines in this age group. Studies for each vaccine were conducted as a randomized double-blind study. In both studies, participants in this age group received either two doses of the vaccine (Moderna or Pfizer-BioNTech) or saline placebo. Results showed that both vaccines are safe and effective to prevent severe COVID-19 illness in this age group.

Hause AM, Shay DK, Klein NP, Abara WE, Baggs J, Cortese MM, Fireman B, Gee J, Glanz JM, Goddard K, Hanson KE, Hugueley B, Kenigsberg T, Kharbanda EO, Lewin B, Lewis N, Marquez P, Myers T, Naleway A, Nelson JC, Su JR, Thompson D, Olubajo B, Oster ME, Weintraub ES, Williams JTB, Yousaf AR, Zerbo O, Zhang B, Shimabukuro TT. Safety of COVID-19 Vaccination in United States Children Ages 5 to 11 Years . Pediatrics . 2022 Jul 14. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2022-057313.

This study, published July 2022, reviewed adverse events observed following the Pfizer two-dose vaccine administered to children ages 5–11 years and found mild-to-moderate events within the first day or two of vaccination. Researchers analyzed data from three U.S. safety monitoring systems during four months of vaccine administration among children ages 5–11 years to provide insight on adverse events. Among 48,795 children ages 5–11 years enrolled in V-safe—a web-based tool that uses text messages, emails, and web surveys to provide personalized health check-ins for people after receiving a new vaccine—most reported events were mild to moderate, were most frequently reported the day after vaccination, and were more common after the second dose. The most common events reported were injection site pain, fatigue, headache, fever, and muscle soreness. The study also evaluated data from the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), the national spontaneous reporting system co-managed by CDC and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), an active surveillance system that monitors electronic health records for pre-specified events including myocarditis. VAERS received 7,578 adverse event reports; 97% were non-serious. Reviewing 194 serious VAERS reports, 15 myocarditis cases were verified; 8 occurred in males after dose 2. In VSD, no safety signals were detected in weekly sequential monitoring after administration of 726,820 doses. The authors concluded that the vaccine is safe for children ages 5–11 years and that adverse events are usually clinically mild and resolve quickly.

Paddock CD, Reagan-Steiner S, Su JR, Oster ME, Martines RB, Bhatnagar J, Shimabukuro TT. Autopsy Histopathologic Cardiac Findings in 2 Adolescents Following the Second COVID-19 Vaccine Dose . Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2022 Apr 8; 146 (8): 921–923.

Hause AM, Baggs J, Marquez P, Abara WE, Olubajo B, Myers TR, Su JR, Thompson D, Gee J, Shimabukuro TT, Shay DK. Safety Monitoring of COVID-19 Vaccine Booster Doses Among Persons Aged 12-17 Years — United States, December 9, 2021-February 20, 2022 . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep . 2022 Mar 4;71(9):347-351.

CDC reviewed safety data for a third dose of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine administered ≥ 5 months after the second dose among adolescents ages 12–17 years. This review, published March 2022, identified no unusual or unexpected patterns of adverse events. Data from V-safe and the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System were used to characterize adverse events reported among this age group. Reactions such as injection site pain, fatigue, headache, and muscle pain following dose 3 vaccinations were mostly mild to moderate in severity and were most frequently reported the day after vaccination. Myocarditis was less frequently reported following a third dose than a second dose. Parents should be advised that local and systemic reactions are expected among adolescents following Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine dose 3 and that serious adverse events, including myocarditis, are rare.

Yousaf AR, Cortese MM, Taylor AW, Broder KR, Oster ME, Wong JM, Guh AY, McCormick DW, Kamidani S, Schlaudecker EP, Edwards K, Creech CB, Staat MA, Belay ED, Marquez P, Su JR, Salzman MB, Thompson D, Campbell AP, MIS-C Investigation Authorship Group. Reported cases of multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children aged 12-20 years in the USA who received a COVID-19 vaccine, December, 2020, through August, 2021: a surveillance investigation .  Lancet Child Adolesc Health . 2022 May;6(5):303-312. Epub 2022 Feb 23.

DeSilva MB, Haapal J, Vazquez-Benitez G, Daley MF, Nordin JD, Klein NP, Henninger ML, Williams JTB, Hambidge SJ, Jackson ML, Donahue JG, Qian L, Lindley MC, Gee J, Weintraub ES, Kharbanda EO. Association of the COVID-19 Pandemic with Routine Childhood Vaccination Rates and Proportion Up to Date with Vaccinations Across 8 US Health Systems in the Vaccine Safety Datalink .  JAMA Pediatr. 2022 Jan 1;176(1):68-77. Doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.4251.

Routine vaccinations in the United States and globally have been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. This study, published January 2022, used data from eight health systems in California, Oregon, Washington, Colorado, Minnesota, and Wisconsin in the Vaccine Safety Datalink to compare trends in pediatric vaccination before and during the pandemic and to evaluate the proportion of children who were up to date with routine vaccinations in February, May, and September 2020. Children from age groups younger than 24 months and ages 4–6, 11–13, and 16–18 years were included if they had at least 1 week of health system enrollment from January 5, 2020, through October 3, 2020. Results show that as of September 2020, childhood vaccination rates and proportion of children who were up to date on routine vaccinations remained lower than 2019 levels and that intervention measures must be made to promote catch-up vaccinations.

Hause AM, Baggs J, Marquez P, Myers TR, Gee J, Su JR, Zhang B, Thompson D, Shimabukuro TT, Shay DK. COVID-19 Vaccine Safety in Children Ages 5-11 years — United States, November 3-December 19, 2021 . MMWR Morb Mort Wkly Rep. 2021 Dec 31:70(5152);1755-1760.

On October 29, 2021, the FDA expanded emergency use authorization (EUA) for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine to include children ages 5-11 years. Once the EUA was in place, researchers began reviewing vaccine safety data for this age group, collected through the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and v-safe. From November 3 through December 19, 2021, around 8.7 million doses of Pfizer vaccine were administered to children ages 5-11 years. During that time, VAERS received 4,249 reports of adverse events following vaccination for children in that age group, 98% of which were non-serious. There were 11 verified cases of myocarditis. Of the over 42,000 children enrolled in v-safe, 70% recorded a second dose. Local reactions (symptoms around the injection site) and systemic reactions (fever, headache, fatigue) following dose 2 of Pfizer vaccination among this age group were reported less frequently than reactions reported among children ages 12-15 years. The initial safety findings showed no unusual patterns of adverse events and that the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination continue to outweigh the risks. CDC and FDA will continue to monitor COVID-19 vaccine safety, communicate findings, and use vaccine safety data to inform vaccination recommendations.

Hause AM, Gee J, Baggs J, Abara WE, Marquez P, Thompson D, Su JR, Licata C, Rosenblum HG, Myers TR, Shimabukuro TT, Shay DK. COVID-19 Vaccine Safety in Adolescents—United States, December 14, 2020—July 16, 2021 .  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Jul 30.

As of July 2021, Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech) is the only COVID-19 vaccine authorized for use in adolescents (people aged 12–17 years). To evaluate the safety of Pfizer-BioNTech in adolescents, researchers reviewed data collected from VAERS and v-safe between December 14, 2020 through July 16, 2021. Over 8.9 million Pfizer-BioNTech doses were administered to adolescents ages 12-17. VAERS received 9,246 reports of adverse events in adolescents; over 90% of reports were non-serious. Myocarditis was reported in 4.3% (397) of all VAERS reports. Of the 129,000 adolescents who enrolled in v-safe, the most frequently reported side effects included injection site pain, fatigue, headache, and weakness. With the exception of myocarditis, the safety findings were similar to what was observed during preauthorization trials. CDC and FDA are actively monitoring the safety of COVID-19 vaccines. Serious adverse events after COVID-19 vaccination are rare, and CDC continues to recommend everyone 12 years and older get vaccinated as soon as possible to help protect against COVID-19.

Madni SA, Sharma AJ, Zauche LH, Waters AV, Nahabedian 3rd JF, Johnson T, Olson CK, CDC COVID-19 Vaccine Pregnancy Registry Work Group. CDC COVID-19 Vaccine Pregnancy Registry: Design, data collection, response rates, and cohort description . Vaccine . 2023 Dec 5:S0264-410X(23)01423-8. Doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.11.061. Online ahead of print.

CDC developed and implemented the CDC COVID-19 Vaccine Pregnancy Registry to monitor vaccine safety among pregnant people who received COVID-19 vaccination. Potential participants who received a COVID-19 vaccine during or a month prior to their pregnancy were eligible to participate in the registry, which monitored health outcomes of participants and their infants through phone interviews and review of available medical records. Data for select outcomes, including birth defects, were reviewed by clinicians. In certain cases, medical records were used to confirm and add detail to participant-reported health conditions. Additionally, the authors describe the development and implementation for each data collection aspect of the registry (that is, participant phone interviews, clinical review, and medical record abstraction), data management, and strengths and limitations. The registry continues to provide important information about the safety of COVID-19 vaccination among pregnant people, a population with higher risk of poor outcomes from COVID-19 and who were excluded from the vaccine’s pre-authorization clinical trials. Lessons learned from the registry may guide development and implementation of future vaccine safety monitoring efforts.

Kharbanda EO, Haapala J, Lipkind HS, DeSilva MB, Zhu J, Vesco KK, Daley MF, Donahue JG, Getahun D, Hambidge SJ, Irving SA, Klein NP, Nelson JC, Weintraub ES, Williams JTB, Vazquez-Benitez G. COVID-19 Booster Vaccination in Early Pregnancy and Surveillance for Spontaneous Abortion . JAMA Network Open. 2023 May 19;6(5):e2314350.

This evaluation, published May 2023, found no increased risk of miscarriage among pregnant people who received a monovalent COVID-19 vaccine during early pregnancy. Researchers compared different methods for evaluating associations between monovalent COVID-19 vaccination during early pregnancy and miscarriages. In all analytical approaches, no increased risk for miscarriage was found following COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy. These findings reinforce the safety of COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy.

Vazquez-Benitez G, Haapala J, Lipkind HS, DeSilva MB, Zhu J, Daley MF, Getahun D, Klein NP, Vesco KK, Irving SA, Nelson JC, Williams JTB, Hambidge SJ, Donahue J, Fuller CC, Weintraub ES, Olson C, Kharbanda EO. COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Surveillance in Early Pregnancy in the United States: Design Factors Affecting the Association Between Vaccine and Spontaneous Abortion . American Journal of Epidemiology. 2023 Mar 16;kwad059. Online ahead of print.

This evaluation, published August 2023, found no increased risk of miscarriage among pregnant people who received a monovalent COVID-19 vaccine during early pregnancy. Researchers compared different approaches for evaluating associations between monovalent COVID-19 vaccination during early pregnancy and miscarriages, including number of days between COVID-19 vaccination and miscarriage. In all analytical approaches, no increased risk for miscarriage was found following COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy. These findings reinforce the safety of COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy.

Moro PL, Olson CK, Zhang B, Marquez P, Strid P. Safety of Booster Doses of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccine in Pregnancy in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System . Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Sept 1; 40(3):421-427.

A review of reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) showed that adverse events (AEs) reported after booster dose mRNA COVID-19 vaccination among pregnant people were similar to AEs reported after primary series mRNA COVID-19 vaccination among pregnant people. During September 22, 2021, through March 24, 2022, VAERS received 323 reports of AEs among pregnant people who received the Pfizer-BioNTech or the Moderna COVID-19 booster dose. The most common pregnancy-specific AE reported after receipt of a booster dose was miscarriage, which is relatively common during pregnancy. This study, published September 2022, did not identify any new or unexpected AEs after receipt of a booster dose of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine among pregnant people.

Irving SA, Crane B, Weintraub E, Kauffman TL, Brooks N, Patel SA, Razzaghi H, Belongia EA, Daley MF, Getahun D, Glenn SC, Hambidge SJ, Jackso LA, Kharbanda E, Klein NP, Zerbo O, Naleway AL. Influenza Vaccination Among Pregnant People Before and During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic . Obstet Gynecol . 2023 Sept 1; 142(3):636-639. Online ahead of print.

Using data from the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), this evaluation, published September 2023, focused on flu vaccination coverage during the 2016-2017 through the 2021-2022 flu seasons among pregnant people aged 18-49 years. Flu vaccination increased from the 2016-2017 season to the 2019-2020 season. After declaration of the COVID-19 pandemic, flu vaccination decreased during the 2021-2022 season. In each season, flu vaccination was lowest among pregnant people in this age group and among non-Hispanic Black pregnant people. These decreases show the need for ongoing efforts to reverse the decline in flu vaccination coverage among pregnant people.

DeSilva MB, Haapla J, Vazquez-Benitez G, Boyce TG, Fuller CC, Daley MF, Getahun D, Hambidge SJ, Lipkind HS, Naleway AL, Nelson JC, Vesco KK, Weintraub ES, Williams JTB, Zerbo O, Kharbanda EO. Medically Attended Acute Adverse Events in Pregnant People After Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Booster Vaccination . Obstet Gynecol . 2023 Jul 1;142(1):125-129.

This publication describes an evaluation that looked at more than 80,000 pregnant people who received a monovalent mRNA COVID-19 booster vaccine during their pregnancy to see if there was an association with adverse events. The data showed no increased risk for thrombocytopenia (low platelet counts), myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle), venous thromboembolism (a blood clot that blocks the flow of blood through the veins), ischemic stroke (occurring when there is a lack of blood flow to the brain), or other serious events among pregnant people who received a COVID-19 monovalent mRNA booster dose.

DeSilva M, Haapala J, Vazquez-Benitez G, Vesco KK, Daley MF, Getahun D, Zerbo O, Naleway A, Nelson JC, Williams JTB, Hambidge SJ, Boyce TG, Fuller CC, Lipkind HS, Weintraub E, McNeil MM, Kharbanda EO. Evaluation of Acute Adverse Events after Covid-19 Vaccination during Pregnancy . N Engl J Med. . 2022 Jun 22. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc2205276. Epub ahead of print.

Pregnant people with COVID-19 symptoms have a higher risk of adverse outcomes than people who are not pregnant. A retrospective study published June 2022 and focusing on pregnant people ages 16–49 years who were either vaccinated or unvaccinated between December 15, 2020, and July 1, 2021, was conducted to show the safety of COVID-19 vaccines and the occurrence of adverse events (AEs). There were 45,232 pregnant people identified in the study who received one or two doses of a COVID-19 vaccine. Less than 1% of pregnant people had to be hospitalized for AEs. There were no serious AEs that occurred more frequently among vaccinated versus unvaccinated pregnant people, showing that the COVID-19 vaccine is not linked to serious AEs in this population.

Razzaghi H, Meghani M, Crane B, Ellington S, Naleway AL, Irving SA, Patel SA. Receipt of COVID-19 Booster Dose Among Fully Vaccinated Pregnant Individuals Aged 18 to 49 Years by Key Demographics . JAMA . 2022 Apr 22; .2354-2351 (23) 327 doi:10.1001/jama.2022.6834.

Data from the Vaccine Safety Datalink showed that fewer than half of pregnant people who were up to date with their COVID-19 vaccines received a COVID-19 booster dose by February 2022. Researchers assessed vaccination trends over time among pregnant people ages 18–49 years beginning the week of August 13, 2021, when additional vaccine doses were authorized, through the week ending February 26, 2022. Out of 71,745 people who were pregnant during the study period, 49,072 were fully vaccinated, with 25,321 of those having received a booster dose. Receipt of a booster dose was highest among pregnant people ages 35–49 years, Asian people, and non-Hispanic White people. Booster dose rates were lower among pregnant people ages 18–24 years, non-Hispanic Black people, and Hispanic people. These findings can help inform methods to increase booster dose vaccinations.

Moro PL, Olson CK, Clark E, Marquez P, Strid P, Ellington S, Zhang B, Mba-Jonas A, Alimchandani M, Cragan J, Moore C. Post-authorization surveillance of adverse events following COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant persons in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), December 2020-October 2021 . Vaccine . 2022 May 26;40(24):3389-3394. Epub 2022 Apr 12.

A CDC study published May 2022 and looking at more than 10 months of vaccine safety data from people who were pregnant and received a COVID-19 vaccine found no concerning patterns of health problems related to vaccination. These findings add to a growing body of evidence that COVID-19 vaccines are safe for people who are pregnant. These findings also reaffirm CDC’s recommendation for pregnant people to get vaccinated to protect themselves and their babies from severe COVID-19 illness.

During December 14, 2020, through October 31, 2021, CDC scientists analyzed more than 3,000 reports that were submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a passive vaccine safety monitoring system co-managed by CDC and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The study evaluated and summarized reports to VAERS about people who were pregnant and received a COVID-19 vaccine to assess for potential safety problems with the vaccines. Scientists found no concerning patterns of negative outcomes among people who were pregnant and vaccinated or among their babies.

Lipkind HS, Vazquez-Benitez G, DeSilva M, Vesco KK, Ackerman-Banks C, Zhu J, Boyce TG, Daley MF, Fuller CC, Getahun D, Irving SA, Jackson LA, Williams JTB, Zerbo O, McNeil MM, Olson CK, Weintraub E, Kharbanda KO. Receipt of COVID-19 Vaccine During Pregnancy and Preterm or Small-for-Gestational-Age at Birth — Eight Integrated Health Care Organizations, United States, December 15, 2020-July 22, 2021 . MMWR Morb Mort Wkly Rep. 2022 Jan 4:71(1);26-30. Early release.

Moro PL, Panagiotakopoulos L, Oduyebo T, Olson CK, Myers T. Monitoring the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy in the US.   Human Vaccines & Immunotherapies. 2021 Nov 10. doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2021.1984132.

Zauche LH, Wallace B, Smoots AN, Olson CK, Oduyebo T, Kim SY, Petersen EE, Ju J, Beauregard J, Wilcox AJ, Rose CE, Meaney-Delman DM, Ellington SR, CDC v-safe COVID-19 Pregnancy Registry Team. Receipt of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines and Risk of Spontaneous Abortion   N Engl J Med. 2021 Sept 8. Dpo: 10.1056/NEJMc2113891.

Although pregnant people are at increased risk for severe illness from COVID-19, the COVID-19 vaccination rate among pregnant people has been much lower than that of the general U.S. population. Data about vaccination during pregnancy was initially limited because pregnant participants were excluded from COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials. To evaluate the safety of mRNA vaccines in pregnant people, researchers analyzed data on miscarriage, or a pregnancy loss that occurs before 20 weeks of pregnancy, collected from v-safe COVID-19 Vaccine Pregnancy Registry participants. Over 2,400 registry participants received at least one dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine just before pregnancy or within the first 20 weeks of pregnancy. The cumulative risk of miscarriage among those who received an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine was similar (14.1%) to previously published background rates (11 to 16%) . Therefore, this study demonstrated no increased risk of miscarriage following receipt of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in early pregnancy. Research will continue on the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant people.

Kharbanda EO, Haapala J, DeSilva M, Vazquez-Benitez G, Vesco KK, Naleway AL, Lipkind HS. Spontaneous Abortion Following COVID-19 Vaccination During Pregnancy   JAMA 2021 Sep 8. Doi:10.1001/jama.2021.15494

Although pregnant people are at increased risk for severe illness from COVID-19, the COVID-19 vaccination rate among pregnant people has been much lower than that of the general U.S. population. Data about vaccination during pregnancy was initially limited because pregnant participants were excluded from vaccine clinical trials. Researchers within the Vaccine Safety Datalink, a collaboration between CDC and 9 health systems, representing approximately 3% of the U.S. population, analyzed data from 8 health systems from December 15, 2020 through June 28, 2021 to evaluate whether there’s an association between COVID-19 vaccine and miscarriage (pregnancy loss that occurs before 20 weeks of pregnancy). This analysis included over 105,000 pregnancies. About 14% received one or more doses of one of the 3 available COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy before 20 weeks’ gestational age. The analysis found that people who were currently pregnant at the time of COVID-19 vaccination and those who became pregnant after vaccination did not have an increased risk of miscarriage. Research will continue on the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant people.

Razzaghi H, Meghani M, Pingali C, Crane B, Naleway A, Weintraub E, Kenigsberg TA, Lamias MJ, Irving SA, Kauffman TL, Vesco KK, Daley MF, DeSilva M, Donahue J, Getahun D, Glee S, Hambidge SJ, Jackson LJ, Lipkind HS, Nelson J, Zerbo O, Oduyebo T, Singleton JA, Patel SA. COVID-19 Vaccination Coverage Among Pregnant Women During Pregnancy — Eight Integrated Health Care Organizations, United States, December 14, 2020-May 8, 2021 . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep . 2021 Jun 18;70(24):895-899.

Pregnant people are at increased risk for severe illness and death from COVID-19; however, current data about vaccination coverage and safety in pregnant people are limited. Researchers reviewed safety data collected from the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) on COVID-19 vaccination among pregnant people. From December 14, 2020 to May 8, 2021, 135,968 pregnant people were identified in the VSD network. Of those, only 16.3% received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. Researchers identified Hispanic (11.9%) and non-Hispanic Black women (6%) ages 18 to 24 years old as among the groups of pregnant people with the lowest vaccination rate. Non-Hispanic Asian women were the group with the highest vaccination rate (24.7%). Overall, pregnant women ages 35 to 49 years had a high vaccination rate (22.7%). CDC recommends COVID-19 vaccination for anyone who is pregnant or considering becoming pregnant to prevent serious outcomes from COVID-19 illness. Additional outreach, especially for younger pregnant individuals and those from racial and ethnic minority groups, could increase vaccine confidence and COVID-19 vaccination in these populations.

Shimabukuro TT, Kim SY, Myers TR, Moro PL, Oduyebo T, Panagiotakopoulos L, Marquez PL, Olson CK, Liu R, Chang KT, Ellington SR, Burkel VK, Smoots AN, Green CJ, Licata C, Zhang BC, Alimchandani M, Mba-Jonas A, Martin SW, Gee JM, Meaney-Delman DM, CDC v-safe COVID-19 Pregnancy Registry Team. Prelimiary Findings of mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine Safety in Pregnant Persons . N Engl J Med . 2021 Jun 17;384(24):2273-2282. Epub 2021 Apr 21.

Oliver SE, Wallace M, See I, Mbaeyi S, Godfrey M, Hadler SC, Jatlaoui TC, Twentyman E, Hughes MM, Rao AK, Fiore A, Su JR, Broder KR, Shimabukuro T, Lale A, Shay DK, Markowitz LE, Wharton M, Bell BP, Brooks O, McNally V, Lee GM, Talbot HK, Daley MF. Use of the Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) COVID-19 Vaccine: Updated Interim Recommendations from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices — United States, December 2021 . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Jan 21; 71(3);90–95.

See I, Lale A, Marquez P, Streiff MB, Wheeler AP, Tepper NK, Woo EJ, Broder KR, Edwards KM, Gallego R, Geller AI, Jackson KA, Sharma S, Talaat KR, Walter EB, Akpan IJ, Ortel TL, Urrutia VC, Walker S, Yui JC, Shimabukuro TT, Mba-Jonas A, Su JR, Shay DK. Case Series of Thrombosis with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome after COVID-19 vaccination—United States, December 2020 to August 2021 . Ann Intern Med. 2022 Jan 18. Doi: 10.7326/M21-4502 Online ahead of print.

Thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) is a rare but potentially life-threatening condition that causes blood clots in large blood vessels and low platelets (blood cells that help form clots). To describe surveillance data and reporting rates of all reported TTS cases after COVID-19 vaccination in the United States, researchers reviewed data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) reported during December 14, 2020, through August 31, 2021, for patients who reported TTS symptoms after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine. Results showed 57 confirmed TTS cases after receiving a J&J/Janssen, Pfizer-BioNTech, or Moderna vaccine. Reporting rates for TTS were 3.83 per million vaccine doses (Ad26.COV2.S) and 0.00855 per million vaccine doses (mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines). Of the 3 TTS cases after mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccination (Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna), two were in men older than 50 years and one was in a woman aged 50 to 59 years. All cases after J&J/Janssen vaccination involved hospitalization. Although rare, TTS is a serious adverse event associated with J&J/Janssen vaccination, which is no longer available in the U.S. as of May 2023.

MacNeil JR, Su JR, Broder KR, Guh AY, Gargano JW, Wallace M, Hadler SC, Scobie HM, Blain AE, Moulia D, Daley MF, McNally VV, Romero JR, Keipp Talbot H, Lee GM, Bell BP, Oliver SE. Updated Recommendations from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices for Use of Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) COVID-19 Vaccine After Reports of Thrombosis with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome Among Vaccine Recipients — United States, April 2021 . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Apr 30;70:651-656.

The Johnson & Johnson/Janssen (Janssen) COVID-19 vaccine was authorized for emergency use on February 27, 2021. On April 13, CDC and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommended pausing the use of Janssen vaccine after thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS) was reported among vaccine recipients. TTS is a rare syndrome that involves blood clots in large blood vessels with low platelets. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) held two emergency meetings to review reports of TTS following Janssen vaccine and conducted a risk-benefit assessment. The estimated reporting rate of TTS was 7 cases of TTS per million Janssen doses administered to women aged 18-49 years. After their review, on April 23, ACIP concluded that the benefits of resuming Janssen COVID-19 vaccination among persons aged 18 years and older outweighed the risks and reaffirmed its interim recommendation under FDA’s Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), which includes a new warning for rare clotting events, primarily in women aged 18-49 years. CDC and FDA will continue to closely monitor reports of TTS following Janssen vaccination.

See I, Su JR, Lale A, Woo EJ, Guh AY, Shimabukuro TT, Streiff MB, Rao AK, Wheeler AP, Beavers SF, Durbin AP, Edwards K, Miller E, Harrington TA, Mba-Jonas A, Nair N, Nguyen DT, Talaat KR, Urrutia VC, Walker SC, Creech B, Clark TA, DeStefano F, Broder KR. US Case Reports of Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis With Thrombocytopenia After Ad26.COV2.S Vaccination, March 2 to April 21, 2021   JAMA 2021 April 30. Doi:10.1001/jama.2021.7517 Epub ahead of print.

Around 7 million doses of Johnson & Johnson’s Janssen (J&J/Janssen) COVID-19 vaccine were given between March 2–April 12, 2021. During this time, VAERS received reports following J&J/Janssen vaccination of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) with thrombocytopenia, which involves blood clots in the brain with low platelet counts. By April 21, there were 12 reports of CVST and thrombocytopenia. This serious condition was reported in women between 18 and under 60 years. All were hospitalized; 10 were admitted to intensive care units (ICU). As of April 21, 4 patients were sent home, 2 were moved to hospital units outside of ICU, 3 continued ICU care, and 3 died. The review shows that U.S. cases of CVST and thrombocytopenia after J&J/Janssen vaccination were clinically similar to CVST cases in Europe after Oxford/AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccination. Investigation of the potential relationship between J&J/Janssen vaccine and CVST with thrombocytopenia is ongoing.

These articles listed were posted on a pre-print server and are in the process of being submitted to a scientific or medical journal. Articles posted on a pre-print server  contain preliminary data and are not peer reviewed  (reviewed and evaluated by others in the same field but not involved in the study).

The purpose of posting studies on pre-print is to provide the most current data available to the public. When a manuscript is submitted to a peer review journal, additional data may become available and may alter the analysis of the data posted in the pre-print article.

Hause AM, Shay DK, Klein NP, Abara WE, Baggs J, Cortese MM, Fireman B, Gee J, Glanz JM, Goddard K, Hanson KE, Hugueley B, Kenigsberg K, Kharbanda EO, Lewin B, Lewis N, Marquez P, Myers T, Naleway A, Nelson JC, Su JR, Thompson D, Olubajo B, Oster ME, Weintraub ES, Williams JTB, Yousaf AR, Zerbo O, Zhang B, Shimabukuro TT. Safety of COVID-19 Vaccination in US Children Ages 5-11 Years   Pediatrics . 2022 May 18. Doi.org/10.1542/peds.2022-057313 Online ahead of print.

Observational Maternal COVID-19 Vaccination Study Principal Investigators: Geeta K Swamy,  Karen R Broder, Elizabeth Schlaudecker, Stephen I Pelton Locations: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Boston Medical Center, Duke University, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center First Posted: April 1, 2021 Summary Recruitment Status: Recruiting

Safety of Simultaneous COVID-19 and IIV4 Vaccination Principal Investigators: Emmanuel B Walter, Kawsar Talaat, Elizabeth Schlaudecker, Karen R Broder Locations: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Duke University, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center and Johns Hopkins University First Posted: August 31, 2021 Summary Recruitment Status: Recruiting

To search articles on this page by keyword, first click the “open all” tab to list all publications. Then use the “find on this page” function available in most browsers. On desktop, press CTL+F (PC) or CMD+F (Mac) on your keyboard. A “find” text box will open at the top or bottom of your browser. Type the word or phrase you want to search for.

Qian L, Sy LS, Hong V, Glenn SC, Ryan DS, Nelson JC, Hambidge SJ, Crane B, Zerbo O, DeSilva MB, Glanz JM, Donahue JG, Liles E, Duffy J, Xu S. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Health Care Utilization in the Vaccine Safety Datalink: Retrospective Cohort Study . JMIR Public Health Surveill . 2024 Jan 23:10:e48159. Doi:2196/48159.

Zerbo O, Bartlett J, Fireman B, Lewis N, Goddard K, Dooling K, Duffy J, Glanz J, Naleway A, Donahue JG, Klein N. Effectiveness of Recombinant Zoster Vaccine Against Herpes Zoster in a Real-World Setting . Ann Intern Med. 2024 Jan 9. doi: 10.7326/M23-2023. Online ahead of print.

Kurlandsky KE, Stein AB, Hambidge SJ, Weintraub ES, Williams JTB. Reporting of Race and Ethnicity in the Vaccine Safety Datalink, 2011-2022 . Am J Prev Med . 2024 Jan;66(1) 182-184. Doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.08.019. Online ahead of print. Epub 2023 Sep 3.

Groom HC, Brooks NB, Weintraub ES, Slaughter MT, Mittendorf KF, Naleway AL. Incidence of Adolescent Syncope and Related Injuries Following Vaccination and Routine Venipuncture . J Adolesc Health . 2023 Dec 9:S1054-139X(23)00586-4. Doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2023.11.005. Online ahead of print.

Daley MF, Reifler LM, Shoup JA, Glanz JM, Naleway AL, Nelson JC, Williams JTB, McLean HQ, Vazquez-Benitez G, Goddard K, Lewin BJ, Weintraub ES, McNeil MM, Razzaghi H, Singleton JA. Racial and ethnic disparities in influenza vaccination coverage among pregnant women in the United States: The contribution of vaccine-related attitudes . Prev Med . 2023 Dec, 177:107751 doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107751. Online ahead of print .

Kauffman TL, Irving SA, Brooks N, Vesco KK, Slaughter M, Smith N, Tepper NK, Olson CK, Weintraub ES, Naleway AL, Vaccine Safety Datalink Menstrual Irregularities Workgroup. Postmenopausal bleeding after COVID-19 vaccination . Am J Obstet Gynecol , 2023 Sept 17; S0002-9378(23)00613-0. Online ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2023.09.007 .

This study, published September 2023, focused on people who reported postmenopausal bleeding following COVID-19 vaccination between December 2020 and August 2021. In a population ranging from 75,000 to 83,000 people monthly, there was no significant difference in the reports of postmenopausal bleeding before versus after COVID-19 vaccination. Results concluded that COVID-19 vaccination was not linked to an increase in postmenopausal bleeding. These findings reinforce the safety of COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy.

Kenigsberg TA, Goddard K, Hanson KE, Lewis N, Klein N, Irving SA, Naleway AL, Crane B, Kauffman TL, Xu S, Daley MF, Hurley LP, Kaiser R, Jackson LA, Jazwa A, Weintraub ES. Simultaneous administration of mRNA COVID-19 bivalent booster and influenza vaccines . Vaccine . 2023 Sep 7; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.08.023 . Online ahead of print.

Data from August 31–December 31, 2022, show nearly 1 out of 3 people ages 6 months and older in the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) population received bivalent mRNA COVID-19 and flu vaccines at the same time. About 31.6 percent of adults ages 65 years and older in the VSD population also received bivalent mRNA COVID-19 and flu vaccines at the same time. Among those in the VSD population who received a bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccine but not a flu vaccine at the same time, about 13 percent received a flu vaccine before receiving a bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccine, and about 40 percent received a flu vaccine after receiving a bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. This September 2023 publication is informative for future VSD studies and strategies for vaccine promotion and service delivery.

Irving SA, Crane B, Weintraub E, Kauffman TL, Brooks N, Patel SA, Razzaghi H, Belongia EA, Daley MF, Getahun D, Glenn SC, Hambidge SJ, Jackso LA, Kharbanda E, Klein NP, Zerbo O, Naleway AL. Influenza Vaccination Among Pregnant People Before and During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic . Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Sept 1; 142(3):636-639. Online ahead of print

Yih WK, Daley MF, Duffy J, Fireman B, McClure DL, Nelson JC, Qian L, Smith N, Vazquez-Benitez G, Weintraub E, Williams JTB, Xu S, Maro JC. Safety signal identification for COVID-19 bivalent booster vaccination using tree-based scan statistics in the Vaccine Safety Datalink . Vaccine . 2023 Aug 14; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.07.10 Online ahead of print.

Traditional active vaccine safety monitoring involves pre-determining specific health outcomes to look for following vaccination, as well as specific timeframes in which to look for these outcomes, limiting the types of adverse events that can be evaluated. In this study, published August 2023, the authors used tree-based scan statistics (the result of a technique used to visualize data) to look broadly for more than 60,000 possible adverse events following bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. The study population included people aged 5 years and older from the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) who received the Moderna or Pfizer-BioNTech bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccine through November 2022 and who were followed for 56 days post-vaccination. Using diagnostic data from inpatient or emergency department settings of those treated for various conditions following vaccination, the authors looked for clusters or trends of common health outcomes. Analysis included 352,509 doses of Moderna and 979,189 doses of Pfizer-BioNTech bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. No statistically significant clusters were found following Moderna vaccination. Following Pfizer-BioNTech vaccination, clusters of unspecified adverse events, influenza, cough, and COVID-19 were found. The unspecified events were like those seen in other vaccine studies using the same method. The clusters of respiratory illness were likely due to overlap of the follow-up period with the spread of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), influenza, and COVID-19. Not targeting specific health outcomes following COVID-19 vaccination is a unique advantage of this study’s design, as it allows for many possible diagnoses. Disadvantages, however, include the possibility for missing adverse events not strongly clustered in time or within the data “tree”.

Romanson B, Moro PL, Su JR, Marquez P, Nair N, Day B, DeSantis A, Shimabukuro TT. Notes from the Field: Safety Monitoring of Novavax COVID-19 Vaccine Among Persons Aged ≥ 12 Years – United States, July 13, 2022 – March 13, 2023 . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep . 2023 Aug 4. 72(31);850-851.

To assess the safety of the Novavax COVID-19 vaccine among individuals aged 12 years and older, CDC reviewed reports made to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) from July 13, 2022, to March 13, 2023. During the review period, the safety profile of the Novavax COVID-19 vaccine was consistent with data from clinical trials. There were no unexpected safety concerns identified in this review, published August 2023. The most commonly reported side effects were not serious and included dizziness, fatigue, and headache.

Moro PL, Zhang B, Marquez P, Reich J. Post-marketing Safety Surveillance of Hexavalent Vaccine in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System . Journal of Pediatrics. 2023 Jul 28. Doi.org/10.1016/j.peds.2023.113643. Online ahead of print.

Combination vaccines involve taking multiple vaccines that can be given individually and putting them into one vaccine. This publication describes data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) to assess the safety of Vaxelis, a vaccine protecting from diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, poliovirus, hepatitis B, and Haemophilus influenza b. VAERS received 501 reports involving Vaxelis in the United States during June 26, 2019, to June 16, 2023. In 332 of these reports, Vaxelis was given to patients with one or more other vaccines. Of the 501 reports, vaccination errors (for example, extra dose or wrong product administered) compromised half of all reports. The most common adverse events observed among all reports (nonserious and serious) included fever, vomiting, and injection site reactions. Twenty-one reports were considered serious. This evaluation did not identify new or unexpected safety issues associated with receipt of Vaxelis.

Kenigsberg TA, Hanson KE, Klein NP, Zerbo O, Goddard K, Xu S, Yih WK, Irving SA, Hurley LP, Glanz JM, Kaiser R, Jackson LA, Weintraub ES. Safety of simultaneous vaccination with COVID-19 vaccines in the Vaccine Safety Datalink . Vaccine . 2023 Jul 19; 41(32), 4658–4665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.06.042 .

To assess the safety of receiving COVID-19 vaccines at the same time as other vaccines, data from December 2020 to May 2022 were analyzed using the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD). Vaccinations received at the same time as COVID-19 vaccines most frequently were influenza, human papillomavirus (HPV), Tdap, and meningococcal. Results of this assessment, published July 2023, showed pre-specified health outcomes to be rare among those who received a COVID-19 vaccine and another vaccine at the same time and were not different compared to people who did not receive another vaccine at the same time as a COVID-19 vaccine. These findings reinforce the safety of COVID-19 vaccination.

Woo EJ, Gee J, Marquez P, Baggs J, Abara WE, McNeil MM, Dimova RB, Su JR. Post-authorization safety surveillance of Ad.26.COV2.S vaccine: Reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System and v-safe, February 2021-February 2022 . Vaccine . 2023 Jul 5; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.06.023 Online ahead of print.

In this July 2023 publication, data from February 27, 2021, to February 28, 2022, reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and V-safe were reviewed to evaluate adverse events following receipt of the J&J/Janssen COVID-19 vaccine (no longer available in the United States). More than 17 million vaccine doses were given during this period. Most adverse events reported were non-serious. The evaluation further confirmed safety risks for thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (a very rare condition in which a person has blood clots as well as low platelet counts) and Guillain-Barré syndrome (a rare disorder in which the body’s immune system attacks its nerves) and identified a potential safety concern for myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) following vaccination.

Schmader KE, Liu CK, Flannery B, Rountree W, Auerbach H, Barnett ED, Schlaudecker EP, Todd CA, Poniewierski M, Staat MA, Harrington T, Li R, Broder KR, Walter EB. Immunogenicity of adjuvanted versus high-dose inactivated influenza vaccines in older adults: a randomized clinical trial . Immun Ageing . 2023 Jul 1; 20(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12979-023-00355-7.

This U.S. randomized clinical trial directly compared the immune responses of Fluad® and Fluzone® High-Dose in adults aged 65 years and older and found that, overall, the immune responses after receipt of each vaccine were similar. Seroconversion (a type of immune response) to the A(H3N2) virus component of the flu vaccine was not as high after receipt of Fluad® compared with Fluzone® High-Dose; however, the clinical importance of this finding is unclear. This was the first randomized controlled clinical trial in the U.S. directly comparing immune response following vaccination with adjuvanted inactivated influenza vaccine (aIIV) and high-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV-HD) in adults aged 65 years and older. The study, published July 2023, was conducted with trivalent vaccine formulations (aIIV3 and HD-IIV3) before the currently recommended quadrivalent vaccine formulations (aIIV4 and HD-IIV4) were made available.

Zhou ZH, Cortese MM, Fang JL, Wood R, Hummell DS, Risma KA, Norton AE, KuKuruga M, Kirshner S, Rabin RL, Agarabi C, Staat MA, Halasa N, Ware RE, Stahl A, McMahon M, Browning P, Maniatis P, Bolcen S, Edwards KM, Su JR, Dharmarajan S, Forshee R, Broder KR, Anderson S, Kozlowski S. Evaluation of association of anti-PEG antibodies with anaphylaxis after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination . Vaccine . 2023 Jun 23; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.05.029 Online ahead of print.

Soon after mRNA COVID-19 vaccines became available for use in the United States, cases of anaphylaxis (an-uh-fuh-LAK-sis), or severe whole body allergic reactions, were reported in vaccine safety monitoring systems, raising concerns that rates of this severe allergic reaction were higher with mRNA vaccines than with other vaccines. Learning the cause of anaphylaxis following mRNA vaccination is important because multiple vaccine doses are required to be considered fully vaccinated against COVID-19. The mRNA COVID-19 vaccines contain polyethylene glycol (PEG), which has been associated with allergic reactions in some medical products. In this publication, authors share results of an evaluation to determine if PEG may cause anaphylaxis following mRNA vaccination. The study compared levels of anti-PEG Immunoglobin E (IgE), a type of antibody, in serum samples of patients who had anaphylaxis after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination to those of patients who did not have any allergic reaction after mRNA vaccination. The evaluation found that anti-PEG IgE antibodies were rare in people with anaphylaxis after mRNA vaccination and that low levels of the antibody were found in people who did not have an allergic reaction after mRNA vaccination. The results suggest that PEG allergy is not a common cause of anaphylaxis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination.

Miller ER, Moro PL, Shimabukuro TT, Carlock G, Davis SN, Freeborn EM, Roberts AL, Gee J, Taylor AW, Gallego R, Suragh T, Su JR. COVID-19 vaccine safety inquiries to the centers for disease control and prevention immunization safety office . Vaccine . 2023 Jun 19; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.05.054 Online ahead of print.

Knowing which vaccine safety topics are important to the public and other partners helps guide CDC’s efforts to better communicate relevant information to its audiences. This June 2023 publication provides a brief overview of the most common questions and concerns about COVID-19 vaccines that were received by the CDC’s Immunization Safety Office. During December 2020 to August 2022, CDC’s Immunization Safety Office received 1,655 inquiries from public health officials, healthcare providers, and the general public about the safety of COVID-19 vaccines. The most common COVID-19 vaccine safety questions were about deaths following vaccination, myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle), pregnancy, and reproductive health outcomes; understanding or interpreting data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS); and thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (a very rare condition in which a person has blood clots as well as low platelet counts).

Naleway AL, Henninger ML, Irving SA, Bianca Salas S, Kauffman TL, Crane B, Mittendorf KF, Harsh S, Elder C, Gee J. Epidemiology of Upper Limb Complex Regional Pain Syndrome in a Retrospective Cohort of Persons Aged 9-30 Years, 2002-2017 . 2023 Jun 15; Perm J , 27(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.7812/TPP/22.170 .

This June 2023 publication describes complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), a form of chronic pain that usually affects an arm or a leg, and rates of CRPS over a period spanning human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine licensure and reports of CRPS following HPV vaccination. The authors examined CRPS diagnoses in patients aged 9-30 years during January 2002 through December 2017 using electronic medical records, excluding patients with lower limb diagnoses only. Rates of CRPS diagnoses were calculated for three periods: Period 1 (2002-2006: before HPV vaccine licensure), Period 2 (2007-2012: after licensure but before published reports of CRPS), and Period 3 (2013-2017: after published reports of CRPS). A total of 231 individuals received an upper limb or unspecified CRPS diagnosis during the study period; 113 cases were verified through medical record examination. Most verified cases (73 percent) of CRPS were associated with non-vaccine-related injuries or surgical procedures. These data provide a comprehensive assessment of CRPS in children and young adults and provide further reassurance about the safety of HPV vaccination.

Day B, Menschik D, Thompson D, Jankosky C, Su J, Moro P, Zinderman C, Welsh K, Dimova RB, Nair N. Reporting rates for VAERS death reports following COVID-19 vaccination, December 14, 2020-November 17, 2021 . Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf . 2023 Jul 9; 32(7):763-772. Online ahead of print.

The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is one of several national vaccine safety monitoring systems that can identify potential health problems (also known as safety signals) after vaccination. Reports submitted to VAERS do not necessarily mean that a vaccine caused the reported health problems–VAERS is designed to look for signals of possible health problems. If vaccine safety experts and scientists detect a safety signal, they conduct follow-up analyses to investigate further.

For COVID-19 vaccines under the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) emergency use authorization, healthcare providers were required to report any death following vaccination to VAERS, regardless of the cause of death. Reports of death following vaccination are continuously monitored by vaccine safety experts.

This review of VAERS data, published July 2023, looked at deaths reported after COVID-19 vaccination in the United States between December 14, 2020, and November 17, 2021, in VAERS. There were 9,201 deaths reported among COVID-19 vaccine recipients during this time, still lower than all-cause death rates (the number of deaths reported among people overall) reported within the population. The study’s findings do not suggest an association between vaccination and overall increased rate of death and add to the evidence base supporting safe use of COVID-19 vaccines.

Greenberg V, Vazquez-Benitez G, Kharbanda EO, Daley MF, Tseng HF, Klein NP, Naleway AL, Williams JTB, Donahue J, Jackson L, Weintraub E, Lipkind H, DeSilva MB. Tdap vaccination during pregnancy and risk of chorioamnionitis and related infant outcomes . Vaccine . 2023 May 23;41(22):3429-3435

A new CDC study’s findings provide additional support for the safety of Tdap vaccination during pregnancy. As a result, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices has made no changes to its recommendations for routine Tdap immunization among pregnant people. These findings reinforce the safety of Tdap vaccination during pregnancy. Pregnant women should receive one dose of Tdap during each pregnancy, irrespective of their history of receiving the vaccine. Tdap vaccine should be administered at 27 through 36 weeks’ gestation, preferably during the earlier part of this period, although it may be administered at any time during pregnancy.

Hanson KE, Marin M, Daley MF, Groom HC, Jackson LA, Sy LS, Klein NP, DeSilva MB, Panagiotakopoulos L, Weintraub E, Belongia EA, McLean HQ. Safety of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine in adolescents and adults in the vaccine safety Datalink . Vaccine X : 2023 Feb 4; 13, 100268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvacx.2023.100268 .

The measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine (MMR) is usually given to children; however, some adolescents and adults also receive the MMR vaccine for various reasons. This study, published February 2023, looked at adolescents aged 9-17 years and adults aged 18 years and older who received an MMR vaccine during January 2010 through December 2018. Reactions following vaccination were categorized as clinically serious and for medical review or as non-serious. Results showed that during this period, 276,327 MMR doses were given to adolescents and adults, and serious outcomes following receipt of the vaccine were rare.

Abara WE, Gee J, Marquez P, Woo J, Myers TR, DeSantis A, Baumblatt JAG, Woo EJ, Thompson D, Nair N, Su JR, Shimabukuro TT, Shay DK. Reports of Guillain-Barré Syndrome After COVID-19 Vaccination in the United States . JAMA Network. 2023 Feb 1;6(2):e2253845. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.53845.

Evidence suggests an increased risk of Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) (a rare disorder in which the body’s immune system attacks its nerves) among adults 18 years and older who received the J&J/Janssen COVID-19 vaccine (no longer available in the United States). This publication describes U.S.-based reports of possible GBS made to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) between December 14, 2020, and January 28, 2022. Medical record review was conducted for most of the cases, and this review observed an elevation in GBS among adults who received the J&J/Janssen COVID-19 vaccine with no observed elevation of GBS among adults who received the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.

Myers TR, Marquez PL, Gee JM, Hause AM, Panagiotakopoulos L, Zhang B, McCullum I, Licata C, Olson CK, Rahman S, Kennedy SB, Cardozo M, Patel CR, Maxwell L, Kallman JR, Shay DK, Shimabukuro TT. The v-safe after vaccination health checker: Active vaccine safety monitoring during CDC’s COVID-19 pandemic response . Vaccine . 2023 Jan 23; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.12.031 Online ahead of print.

CDC’s V-safe vaccine safety monitoring system supplements existing vaccine safety monitoring programs including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD). V-safe provides near real-time reporting of how people feel following vaccination and encourages reports to VAERS from V-safe participants who sought medical care following vaccination. V-safe also supports the identification of candidates for enrollment in a large post-vaccination pregnancy registry. This February 2023 publication provides an overview of how V-safe works, how it is used, and how updates to the platform have been completed.

Yih WK, Daley MF, Duffy J, Fireman B, McClure D, Nelson J, Qian L, Smith N, Vazquez-Benitez G, Weintraub E, Williams JTB, Xu S, Maro JC. A broad assessment of covid-19 vaccine safety using tree-based data-mining in the vaccine safety datalink . Vaccine . 2023 Jan 16; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.12.026 . Online ahead of print.

Tree-based data mining is used to look for clusters of a range of health outcomes in health data. The Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) applied this methodology to evaluate adverse events (AEs) following COVID-19 vaccines. The data were monitored to identify clusters of potential AEs among COVID-19 vaccines from each manufacturer (Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna, and J&J/Janssen). Results showed clusters ranging from common vaccine reactions to other rare reactions—such as chest pain, palpitations, and myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) and pericarditis (inflammation of the lining of the heart muscle)—that showed up for specific vaccines such as after receipt of a second dose of Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA COVID-19 vaccine.

Xu S, Huang R, Sy LS, Hong V, Glenn SC, Ryan DS, Morrissette K, Vazquez-Benitez G, Glanz JM, Klein NP, Fireman B, McClure D, Liles EG, Weintraub ES, Tseng HF, Qian L. A safety study evaluating non-COVID-19 mortality risk following COVID-19 vaccination . Vaccine . 2023 Jan 16; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.12.036 . Online ahead of print.

Yih WK, Daley MF, Duffy J, Fireman B, McClure D, Nelson J, Qian L, Smith N, Vazquez-Benitez G, Weintraub E, Williams JTB, Xu S, Maro JC. Tree-based data mining for safety assessment of first COVID-19 booster doses in the Vaccine Safety Datalink . Vaccine . 2023 Jan 9; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.11.053 . Online ahead of print.

Tree-based data mining is used to look for clusters of a range of health outcomes in electronic health data. This publication describes the data mining methodology that was applied to Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) data to assess the safety of first booster doses of Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines and the J&J/Janssen COVID-19 vaccine (no longer available in the United States). Results identified clusters of allergy/rash following receipt of the Moderna booster, common adverse effects following receipt of the Pfizer-BioNTech booster, and no noteworthy clusters following receipt of the J&J/Janssen booster.

Moro PL, Zhang B, Ennulat C, Harris M, McVey R, Woody G, Marquez P, McNeil MM, Su JR. Safety of Co-administration of mRNA COVID-19 and seasonal inactivated influenza vaccines in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) during July 1, 2021 – June 30, 2022 . Vaccine . 2023 Jan 9; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.12.069 Online ahead of print.

COVID-19 vaccines can be co-administered with other recommended vaccines, including seasonal flu vaccines. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) data were used to look at adverse events (AEs) following co-administration of mRNA COVID-19 and flu vaccines during July 1, 2021, through June 30, 2022. During this period, VAERS received 2,449 reports of AEs consisting of injection site reactions, headaches, pain, dyspnea, COVID-19 infection, and chest pain after co-administration of mRNA COVID-19 and flu vaccines. This review did not reveal unusual or unexpected patterns of AEs.

Malden DE, Gee J, Glenn S, Li Z, Mercado C, Ogun OA, Kim S, Lewin BJ, Ackerson BK, Jazwa A, Weintraub ES, McNeil MM, Tartof S. Reactions following Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccination and related healthcare encounters among 7,077 children aged 5-11 years within an integrated healthcare system . Vaccine . 2023 Jan 9; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.10.079 . Online ahead of print.

Tompkins LK, Baggs J, Myers TR, Gee JM, Marquez PL, Kennedy SB, Peake D, Dua D, Hause AM, Strid P, Abara W, Rossetti R, Shimabukuro TT, Shay DK.  Association between history of SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe systemic adverse events after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination among U.S. adults .  Vaccine . 2022 Dec 12;S0264-410X(22)01342-1. Online ahead of print.

Goddard K, Hanson KE, Lewis N, Weintraub E, Fireman B, Klein NP. Incidence of Myocarditis/Pericarditis Following mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination Among Children and Younger Adults in the United States . Annals of Internal Medicine . 2022 Dec. doi.org/10.7326/M22-2274.

Hause AM, Marquez P, Zhang B, Myers TR, Gee J, Su JR, Blanc PG, Thomas A, Thompson D, Shimabukuro TT, Shay DK.  Safety Monitoring of Bivalent COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Booster Doses Among Persons Aged ≥ 12 Years – United States, August 31 – October 23, 2022 .  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly  Rep. 2022 Nov 4; 71(44);1401–1406.

This CDC study, published November 2022, found that among people aged 12 years and older who received a bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccine booster dose, serious adverse events were rare. Common side effects were headache, fever, fatigue, pain where the shot was given, and chills. The study’s preliminary findings support the overall safety of bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. Health impacts associated with the original mRNA and the bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are less frequent and less serious than COVID-19 illness.

During August 31–October 23, 2022, approximately 4.7 million people aged 12 years and older received a dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech bivalent mRNA COVID-19 booster, and approximately 2.6 million people aged 18 years and older received a dose of the Moderna bivalent mRNA COVID-19 booster. CDC reviewed health impact assessments received by CDC’s V-safe and reviewed reports voluntarily submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System during August 31–October 23, 2022, to characterize the safety of bivalent mRNA COVID-19 booster vaccination among people in this age group. The initial safety findings for bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were generally like those from pre-authorization clinical trials. Data identified no unusual or unexpected patterns of adverse events following vaccination with the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna bivalent mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. Reports of serious adverse events following receipt of bivalent COVID-19 vaccine booster doses were rare. Commonly reported reactions such as headache, fever, fatigue, injection-site pain, and chills, were mild and like those reported following receipt of the monovalent mRNA COVID-19 booster dose.

Nelson JC, Ulloa-Perez E, Yu O, Cook AJ, Jackson ML, Belongia EA, Daley MF, Harpaz R, Kharbanda EO, Klein NP, Naleway AL, Tseng HF, Weintraub ES, Duffy J, Yih WK, Jackson LA. Active Post-Licensure Safety Surveillance for Recombinant Zoster Vaccine Using Electronic Health Record Data . Am J Epidemiol . 2022 Oct 4. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwac170. Online ahead of print.

Recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) was licensed in 2017 to prevent herpes zoster and its complications in older adults. Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) electronic health records data were used to monitor adults ages 50 years and older who received care at VSD healthcare systems in the United States to identify increased risks of 10 pre-specified outcomes potentially related to RZV—including stroke, anaphylaxis, and Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). There were 647,833 RZV doses administered during January 2018 through December 2019. During this time, no increased risk of any of these outcomes was detected for RZV recipients who had received the Zoster Vaccine Live (ZVL), a live-attenuated virus vaccine, from 2013–2017, or for non-RZV vaccinated persons who had an annual check-up during the 2018–2019 study period. This study, published October 2022, provides additional reassurance of the safety of recombinant zoster vaccine.

Daley MF, Reifler LM, Glanz JM, Hambidge SJ, Getahun D, Irving SA, Nordin JD, McClure DL, Klein NP, Jackson ML, Duffy J, DeStefano F. Association Between Aluminum Exposure from Vaccines Before Age 24 Months and Persistent Asthma at Age 24-59 Months [PDF – 10 Pages] . Academic Pediatrics . 2022 Sept 27. Online ahead of print

This observational study suggests a possible association between exposure to aluminum in some childhood vaccines and development of persistent asthma in children. The study consisted of 326,991 children and found that cumulative exposure to aluminum from vaccines during the first two years of life was associated with a small increased risk of persistent asthma in children ages 2-5 years. There is overwhelming evidence of the benefits of vaccines. CDC is not changing the current routine childhood vaccination recommendations based on this single study. Small amounts of aluminum are included in many routine childhood vaccines to help the body build a stronger immunity from diseases. Further investigation is needed to explore the potential risk of aluminum exposure from routine childhood vaccines on the development of persistent asthma in children; efforts are underway.

Hause AM, Marquez P, Zhang B, Myers TR, Gee J, Su JR, Parker C, Thompson D, Panchanathan SS, Shimabukuro TT, Shay DK. COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine Safety Among Children Aged 6 Months–5 Years — United States, June 18, 2022–August 21, 2022 . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep . 2022 Sep 2;71(35);1115-1120.

Hause AM, Baggs J, Marquez P, Myers TR, Su JR, Hugueley B, Thompson D, Gee J, Shimabukuro TT, Shay DK. Safety Monitoring of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine Booster Doses Among Children Aged 5–11 Years — United States, May 17–July 31, 2022 . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022 Aug 19;71(33);1047–1051.

Goddard K, Lewis N, Fireman B, Weintraub E, Shimabukuro T, Zerbo O, Boyce TG, Oster ME, Hanson KE, Donahue JG, Ross P, Naleway A, Nelson JC, Lewin B, Glanz JM, Williams JTB, Kharbanda EO, Yih WK, Klein NP. Risk of myocarditis and pericarditis following BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccination . Vaccine . 2022 Aug 19; 40(35):5153-5159. Epub 2022 Jul 12.

Wong KK, Heilig CM, Hause A, Myers TR, Olson CK, Gee J, Marquez P, Strid P, Shay DK. Menstrual irregularities and vaginal bleeding after COVID-19 vaccination reported to v-safe active surveillance, USA in December, 2020-January, 2022: an observational cohort study . Lancet Digit Health . 2022 Aug 9; S2589-7500(22)00125-X. Online ahead of print.

In this study, published August 2022, CDC vaccine safety experts found that menstrual irregularities and vaginal bleeding have been reported among people who received COVID-19 vaccines. These reports were most often about menstrual cycle timing and the severity of menstrual symptoms. During December 14, 2020, through January 9, 2022, researchers analyzed data from V-safe, a web-based tool that uses text messages, emails, and web surveys to provide personalized health check-ins for people after receiving a new vaccine. Researchers identified 84,943 responses to open-ended survey questions related to menstruation or vaginal bleeding from 63,815 V-safe participants ages 18 years and older. Most respondents reported changes to the timing (i.e., cycle beginning earlier or later than expected, missed cycles, and spotting) and the severity (i.e., heavier flow, more painful than usual, or prolonged bleeding) of menstrual symptoms after COVID-19 vaccination. More respondents reported symptoms after their second vaccine dose compared with their first vaccine dose. While researchers acknowledge that an association between COVID-19 vaccination and menstrual irregularities is plausible, they also note that menstrual irregularities are common without COVID-19 vaccination and suggest that further studies are needed to assess clinical significance of menstrual irregularities after vaccination.

Hause AM, Baggs J, Marquez P, Abara WE, Baumblatt JG, Thompson D, Su JR, Myers TR, Gee J, Shimabukuro TT, Shay DK. Safety Monitoring of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine First Booster Doses Among Persons Aged ≥12 Years with Presumed Immunocompromise Status — United States, January 12, 2022–March 28, 2022 .. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep . 2022 Jul 15; 71(28);899–903.

Zerbo O, Modaressi S, Goddard K, Lewis E, Getahun D, Palmsten KK, Fuller CC, Crane B, Donahue JG, Daley MF, Jackson LA, Wodi AP, McNeil MM, Klein NP. Safety of Live-Attenuated Vaccines in Children Exposed to Biologic Response Modifiers in Utero . Pediatrics . 2022 Jul 1; 150(1):e2021056021.

Fleming-Dutra KE, Wallace M, Moulia DL, Twentyman E, Roper LE, Hall E, Link-Gelles R, Godfrey M, Woodworth KR, Anderson TC, Rubis AB, Shanley E III, Jones JM, Morgan RL, Brooks O, Talbot HK, Lee GM, Bell BP, Daley M, Meyer S, Oliver SE. Interim Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices for Use of Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccines in Children Aged 6 Months–5 Years — United States, June 2022 . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep . 2022 Jul 1; 71(26);859–868.

Hause AM, Zhang B, Yue X, Marquez P, Myers TR, Parker C, Gee J, Su J, Shimabukuro TT, Shay DK. Reactogenicity of Simultaneous COVID-19 mRNA Booster and Influenza Vaccination in the US . JAMA Netw Open 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2222241.doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.22241.

Weintraub ES, Oster ME, Klein NP. Myocarditis or Pericarditis Following mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination . JAMA . 2022 Jun 24; 5(6):e2218512. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.18512

DeSilva M, Haapala J, Vazquez-Benitez G, Vesco KK, Daley MF, Getahun D, Zerbo O, Naleway A, Nelson JC, Williams JTB, Hambidge SJ, Boyce TG, Fuller CC, Lipkind HS, Weintraub E, McNeil MM, Kharbanda EO. Evaluation of Acute Adverse Events after Covid-19 Vaccination during Pregnancy . N Engl J Med . 2022 Jun 22. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc2205276. Epub ahead of print.

Moro PL, Olson CK, Clark E, Marquez P, Strid P, Ellington S, Zhang B, Mba-Jonas A, Alimchandani M, Cragan J, Moore C. Post-authorization surveillance of adverse events following COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant persons in the vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS), December 2020 – October 2021 . Vaccine . 2022 May 26; 40(24):3389-3394. Epub 2022 Apr 12.

Xu S, Hong V, Sy LS, Glenn SC, Ryan DS, Morrissette KL, Nelson JC, Hambidge SJ, Crane B, Zerbo O, DeSilva MB, Glanz JM, Donahue JG, Liles E, Duffy J, Qian L. Changes in incidence rates of outcomes of interest in vaccine safety studies during the COVID-19 pandemic . Vaccine . 2022 May 20;40(23):3150-3158. Epub 2022 Apr 18.

Kenigsberg TA, Hause AM, McNeil MM, Nelson JC, Shoup JA, Goddard K, Lou Y, Hanson KE, Glenn SC, Weintraub E. Dashboard development for near real-time visualization of COVID-19 vaccine safety surveillance data in the Vaccine Safety Datalink . Vaccine . 2022 May 11;40(22):3064-3071. Epub 2022 Apr 8.

Razzaghi H, Meghani M, Crane B, Ellington S, Naleway AL, Irving SA, Patel SA. Receipt of COVID-19 Booster Dose Among Fully Vaccinated Pregnant Individuals Aged 18 to 49 Years by Key Demographics . JAMA . 2022 Apr 22;327(23):2351-2354. doi:10.1001/jama.2022.683.

Zerbo O, Modaressi S, Goddard K, Lewis E, Fireman B, Daley MF, Irving SA, Jackson LA, Donahue JG, Qian L, Getahun D, DeStefano F, McNeil MM, Klein NP. Safety of measles and pertussis-containing vaccines in children with autism spectrum disorders . Vaccine . 2022 Apr 20; 40(18):2568-2573. Epub 2022 Mar 18.

This study, published April 2022, found no increased risk of adverse events (AEs) after measles or pertussis vaccination among children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) compared to children without an ASD diagnosis. The study included children born between 1995 and 2012 who were ages 4–7 years at the time of vaccination and included members of six healthcare delivery systems within the Vaccine Safety Datalink. The study included 14,947 children with ASD and 1,650,041 children without ASD. Results showed no differences between children with and without ASD for AEs such as fever or reactions that required emergency department visits following their measles or pertussis vaccination.

Paddock CD, Reagan-Steiner S, Su JR, Oster ME, Martines RB, Bhatnagar J, Shimabukuro TT. Autopsy Histopathologic Cardiac Findings in 2 Adolescents Following the Second COVID-19 Vaccine Dose . Arch Pathol Lab Med . 2022 Apr 8; 146 (8): 921–923.

Block JP, Boehmer TK, Forrest CB, Carton TW, Lee GM, Ajani UA, Christakis DA, Cowell LG, Draper C, Ghildayal N, Harris AM, Kappelman MD, Ko JY, Mayer KH, Nagavedu K, Oster ME, Paranjape A, Puro J, Ritchey MD, Shay DK, Thacker D, Gundlapalli AV. Cardiac Complications After SARS-CoV-2 Infection and mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination — PCORnet, United States, January 2021–January 2022 . Morb Mortal Wkly Rep . 2022 Apr 8; 71(14);517-523.

Hanson KE, Goddard K, Lewis N, Fireman B, Myers TR, Bakshi N, Weintraub E, Donahue JG, Nelson JC, Xu S, Glanz JM, Williams JTB, Alpern JD, Klein NP. Incidence of Guillain-Barré Syndrome after COVID-19 Vaccination in the Vaccine Safety Datalink . JAMA Network Open . 2022 Apr 26;5(4):e228879. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.8879.

Sokolow AG, Stallings AP, Kercsmar C, Harrington T, Jimenez-Truquw N, Zhu Y, Sokolow K, Moody A, Schlaudecker EP, Walter EM, Allen Staat M, Broder KR, Creech CB. Safety of Live Attenuated Influenza Vaccine in Children with Asthma . Pediatrics . 2022 Apr 1;149(4):e2021055432. Epub 2022 Mar 28.

People ages 5 years and older with asthma should receive the quadrivalent live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV4) with caution because of concerns for wheezing events. This study, published in April 2022, compared the proportion of children with asthma who experienced asthma-related symptoms after receipt of LAIV4 to the proportion of children with asthma who experienced asthma-related symptoms after receipt of the quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV4) and found that LAIV4 was not associated with increased exacerbations, asthma-related symptoms, or decrease in expiratory flow rate compared with IIV4 among this age group. During two influenza seasons, 142 children with asthma ages 5–17 years were monitored for asthma symptoms for 42 days after IIV4 or LAIV4 vaccination. During the observation period, 18 (13%) of 142 participants had exacerbated symptoms: 8 (11%) who received the LAIV4 and 10 (15%) who received the IIV4 vaccine.

Rosenblum HG, Gee J, Liu R, Marquez PL, Zhang B, Strid P, Abara WE, McNeil MM, Myers TR, Hause AM, Su JR, Markowitz LE, Shimabukuro TT, Shay DK. Safety of mRNA vaccines administered during the initial 6 months of the US COVID-19 vaccination programme: an observational study of reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System and v-safe . Lancet Infect Dis . 2022 Mar 7; S1473-3099(22)00054-8. Online ahead of print.

In a comprehensive analysis of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine data (i.e., Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna), published June 2022, CDC scientists reviewed 6 months of safety data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a passive vaccine safety surveillance system co-managed by CDC and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and V-safe, a web-based tool that uses text messages, emails, and web surveys to provide personalized health check-ins for people after receiving a new vaccine. During December 14, 2020, through June 14, 2021, more than 298 million doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine were administered. The review found that most reported reactions—such as headache, fatigue, and soreness at the injection site—were mild and short in duration and most reported adverse events were not serious (did not require hospitalization or cause disability, life-threatening illness, or death). These findings reinforce evidence that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are safe and could reassure those who might be hesitant to get an mRNA vaccine because of safety concerns.

Hause AM, Baggs J, Marquez P, Abara WE, Olubajo B, Myers TR, Su JR, Thompson D, Gee J, Shimabukuro TT, Shay DK. Safety Monitoring of COVID-19 Vaccine Booster Doses Among Persons Aged 12–17 Years — United States, December 9, 2021–February 20, 2022 . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep . 2022 Mar 1;71(9);347–351.

Moro PL, McNeil MM. Successes of the CDC monitoring systems in evaluating post-authorization safety of COVID-19 vaccines [Editorial] . Expert Rev Vaccines. 2022 Mar;21(3):281-284. Epub 2022 Jan 5.

Irving SA, Groom HC, Dandamudi P, Daley MF, Donahue JG, Gee J, Hechter R, Jackson LA, Klein NP, Liles E, Myers TR, Stokley S. A decade of data: Adolescent vaccination in the vaccine safety datalink, 2007 through 2016 . Vaccine . 2022 Feb 23; 40(9):1246-1252. Epub 2022 Feb 4.

Between May 2005 and March 2007, three vaccines were recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices for adolescents in the United States: meningococcal vaccine (MenACWY), pertussis vaccine (Tdap), and human papillomavirus vaccine (HPV). This study, published February 2022, was conducted regarding all vaccines administered to adolescents ages 11 to 18 years in the Vaccine Safety Datalink population during January 1, 2007, through December 31, 2016, to better understand vaccination coverage (the number of vaccine doses administered) for these vaccines. There were 4,884,553 vaccine visits among this age group during the study period. Vaccine coverage for Tdap, MenACWY, and HPV increased across the study period with a variety of vaccine combinations administered among both sexes. Vaccine administration in this population can provide a historical pattern to compare with future vaccination campaigns among this group.

Hause AM, Baggs J, Marquez P, Myers TR, Su JR, Blanc PG, Gwira Baumblatt JA, Woo EJ, Gee J, Shimabukuro TT, Shay DK. Safety Monitoring of COVID-19 Vaccine Booster Doses Among Adults — United States, September 22, 2021–February 6, 2022 . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep . 2022 Feb 18; 71(7);249–254.

Oster ME, Shay DK, Su JR, Gee J, Creech B, Broder KR, Edwards K, Soslow JH, Dendy JM, Schlaudecker E, Lang SM, Barnett ED, Ruberg FL, Smith MJ, Campbell MJ, Lopes RD, Sperling LS, Baumblatt JA, Thompson DL, Marquez PL, Strid P, Woo J, Puglsey R, Reagan-Steiner S, DeStefano F, Shimabukuro TT. Myocarditis Cases Reported After mRNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccination in the US from December 2020 to August 2021 JAMA . 2022 Jan 25;327(4):331-340. Online ahead of print.

Oliver SE, Wallace M, See I, Mbaeyi S, Godfrey M, Hadler SC, Jatlaoui TC, Twentyman E, Hughes MM, Rao AK, Fiore A, Su JR, Broder KR, Shimabukuro T, Lale A, Shay DK, Markowitz LE, Wharton M, Bell BP, Brooks O, McNally V, Lee GM, Talbot HK, Daley MF. Use of the Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) COVID-19 Vaccine: Updated Interim Recommendations from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices — United States, December 2021 . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep . 2022 Jan 21; 71(3);90–95.

Navarro RA, Lin CC, Colli B, Qian L, Liu ILA, Sy LS, Jacobsen SJ, Tartof SY. Safety of Influenza Vaccination During Orthopedic Surgery Hospitalizations J Am Acad Orthop Surg . 2022 Jan 15;30(2):e155-e163. Doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00101.

Despite national recommendations, flu vaccination rates during hospitalizations remain low. Flu vaccination during hospitalization for orthopedic surgery was studied to address whether there is an increase for infection post discharge. Researchers conducted a study of patients ages ≥ 6 months who were hospitalized for orthopedic surgery between September 1, 2011, and March 31, 2014, to assess the association between flu vaccination during inpatient care for orthopedic surgery and rates of readmission for infections less than seven days post discharge. Results showed 2,395 hospitalizations with inpatient vaccination and 21,708 hospitalizations without inpatient vaccination. Those vaccinated during inpatient care did not show a significant increase in readmission for infection. Data supports the recommendation of vaccinating orthopedic surgery patients against influenza.

Woo EJ, Moro PL. Postmarketing safety surveillance of high-dose quadrivalent influenza vaccine: Reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System .  Vaccine. 2022 Jan 12. ISSN: 0264-410X. Online ahead of print.

On November 4, 2019, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the high-dose flu vaccine (Fluzone High-Dose Quadrivalent; QIV-HD) for flu prevention in individuals ages 65 years and older. A clinical trial did not show major differences in adverse events (AEs) following vaccination with QIV-HD versus Fluzone High-Dose (trivalent). Researchers reviewed and summarized reports of AEs after QIV-HD vaccination to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) to learn more. During July 30, 2020, through June 30, 2021, VAERS received 2,122 reports after vaccination with QIV-HD. The majority (95.1%) were non-serious and included events that had been observed in the clinical trial such as injection site reactions, fever, headache, and nausea. The most common serious events included Guillain-Barré syndrome, cellulitis or other local reactions, constitutional signs/symptoms (e.g., fever), and cardiovascular events. This review, published February 2022, did not reveal new safety concerns.

Lipkind HS, Vazquez-Benitez G, DeSilva M, Vesco KK, Ackerman-Banks C, Zhu J, Boyce TG, Daley MF, Fuller CC, Getahun D, Irving SA, Jackson LA, Williams JTB, Zerbo O, McNeil MM, Olson CK, Weintraub E, Kharbanda KO. Receipt of COVID-19 Vaccine During Pregnancy and Preterm or Small-for-Gestational-Age at Birth — Eight Integrated Health Care Organizations, United States, December 15, 2020-July 22, 2021   MMWR Morb Mort Wkly Rep. 2022 Jan 4:71 (1);26-30. Early release.

DeSilva MB, Haapal J, Vazquez-Benitez G, Daley MF, Nordin JD, Klein NP, Henninger ML, Williams JTB, Hambidge SJ, Jackson ML, Donahue JG, Qian L, Lindley MC, Gee J, Weintraub ES, Kharbanda EO. Association of the COVID-19 Pandemic with Routine Childhood Vaccination Rates and Proportion Up to Date with Vaccinations Across 8 US Health Systems in the Vaccine Safety Datalink   JAMA Pediatr. 2022 Jan 1;176(1):68-77. Doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.4251.

Groom HC, Crane B, Naleway AL, Weintraub E, Daley MF, Wain K, Kurilo MB, Burganowski R, DeSilva MB, Donahue JG, Glenn SC, Goddard K, Jackson ML, Kharbanda EO, Lewis N, Lou Y, Lugg M, Scott E, Sy LS, Williams JTB, Irving SA. Monitoring vaccine safety using the Vaccine Safety Datalink: Assessing capacity to integrate data from Immunization Information Systems Vaccine . 2022 Jan 31;40(5):752-756. Epub 2021 Dec 31.

The Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) uses vaccination data collected from electronic health records at eight integrated health systems to monitor vaccine safety. To capture additional data about vaccines administered outside traditional health systems, however, vaccine safety researchers looked to the state and local Immunization Information Systems (IIS), which collects vaccination data from non-traditional health settings. Researchers conducted a survey from 2009-2010 to evaluate how VSD incorporates state and local IIS data. Results at that time showed that only three of the then seven VSD sites had received any state or local IIS data. To evaluate the current status of IIS data exchange with VSD, researchers surveyed the now eight VSD sites in January 2021. The survey shows that all eight receive and integrate COVID-19 vaccine data from IIS, which positions the VSD well for conducting quality assessments of vaccine safety.

Hause AM, Baggs J, Marquez P, Myers TR, Gee J, Su JR, Zhang B, Thompson D, Shimabukuro TT, Shay DK. COVID-19 Vaccine Safety in Children Ages 5-11 years — United States, November 3-December 19, 2021 .  MMWR Morb Mort Wkly Rep. 2021 Dec 31:70(5152);1755-1760.

Abara WE, Gee J, Mu Y, Deloray M, Ye T, Shay DK, Shimabukuro T. Expected Rates of Select Adverse Events following Immunization for COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Monitoring J Infect Dis . 2021 Dec 27;jiab628. Online ahead of print.

Perez-Vilar S, Dores G, Marquez PL, Ng CS, Cano MV, Rastogi A, Lee L, Su JR, Duffy J. Safety surveillance of meningococcal group B vaccine (Bexsero®), Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, 2015-2018 . Vaccine . 2022 Jan 21;40(2):247-254. Epub 2021 Dec 7.

Glanz JM, Clarke CL, Daley MF, Shoup JA, Hambidge SJ, Williams JTB, Groom HC, Kharbanda EO, Klein NP, Jackson LA, Lewin BJ, McClure DL, Xu S, DeStefano F. The Childhood Vaccination Schedule and the Lack of Association with Type 1 Diabetes .  Pediatrics. 2021 Dec 1;148(6):e2021051910. Doi: 10.1542/peds.2021-051910 Online ahead of print.

Goud R, Lufkin B, Duffy J, Whitaker B, Wong HL, Liao J, Lo AC, Weintraub E, Kelman JA, Forshee RA. Risk of Guillain-Barré Syndrome Following Recombinant Zoster Vaccine in Medicare Beneficiaries .  JAMA Intern Med. 2021 Dec 1;181(12):1623-1630. Doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.6227. Online ahead of print.

Moro PL, Panagiotakopoulos L, Oduyebo T, Olson CK, Myers T. Monitoring the safety of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy in the US .  Human Vaccines & Immunotherapies. 2021 Nov 10. doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2021.1984132.

Chapin-Bardales J, Myers T, Gee J, Shay DK, Marquez P, Baggs J, Zhang B, Licata C, Shimabukuro TT. Reactogenicity within 2 weeks after mRNA COVID-19 vaccines: Findings from the CDC v-safe surveillance system . Vaccine. 2021 Nov 26;39(48):7066-7073. Epub 2021 Oct 16.

Pingali C, Meghani M, Razzaghi H, , Lamias MJ, Weintraub E, Kenigsberg TA, Klein NP, Lewis N, Fireman B, Zerbo O, Bartlett J, Goddard K, Donahue J, Hanson K, Naleway A, Kharbanda EO, Yih K, Clark Nelson J, Lewin BJ, Williams JTB, Glanz JM, Singletom JA, Patel SA. COVID-19 Vaccination Coverage Among Insured Persons Aged ≥ 16 years, by Race/Ethnicity and Other Selected Characteristics — Eight Integrated Health Care Organizations, United States, December 14, 2020-May 15, 2021 . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep . 2021 Jul 16;70(28):985-990.

Shay DK, Shimabukuro TT DeStefano F. Myocarditis Occurring After Immunization with mRNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccines: Editorial .  JAMA Cardiol. Published online June 29, 2021. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2021.2821.

Razzaghi H, Meghani M, Pingali C, Crane B, Naleway A, Weintraub E, Kenigsberg TA, Lamias MJ, Irving SA, Kauffman TL, Vesco KK, Daley MF, DeSilva M, Donahue J, Getahun D, Glee S, Hambidge SJ, Jackson LJ, Lipkind HS, Nelson J, Zerbo O, Oduyebo T, Singleton JA, Patel SA. COVID-19 Vaccination Coverage Among Pregnant Women During Pregnancy — Eight Integrated Health Care Organizations, United States, December 14, 2020-May 8, 2021 . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Re p. 2021 Jun 18;70(24):895-899.

Naleway AL, Crane B, Irving SA, Bachman D, Vesco KK, Daley MF, Getahun D, Glenn SC, Hambidge SJ, Jackson LA, Klein NP, McCarthy NL, McClure DL, Panagiotakopoulos L, Panozzo CA, Vazquez-Benitez G, Weintraub E, Zerbo O, Kharbanda EO. Vaccine Safety Datalink infrastructure enhancements for evaluating the safety of maternal vaccination Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2021 Jun 14;12:20420986211021233. eCollection 2021.

Monitoring vaccine safety during pregnancy is important because pregnant women have historically been excluded from vaccine clinical trials. The Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) conducts near-real-time surveillance on vaccine safety. When data is collected, researchers use specific algorithms to identify particular subjects. Since 2012, VSD researchers have used an algorithm called Pregnancy Episode Algorithm (PEA) to identify medical records of people who have been vaccinated during pregnancy. In this study, researchers wanted to update and enhance the PEA to include the updated medical codes and incorporate sources of data about how far along the person is in the pregnancy. The researchers did so by developing the Dynamic Pregnancy Algorithm (DPA), which identifies people earlier in their pregnancies. The enhanced PEA and the new DPA will assist researchers in better evaluating the safety of current and future vaccinations administered during or around the time of pregnancy.

Xu S, Clarke Cl, Newcomer SR, Daley MF, Glanz JM. Sensitivity analyses if unmeasured and partially-measure confounders using multiple imputation in a vaccine safety study . Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2021 Sept;30(9):1200-1213. Epub 2021 May 31.

Liles E, Irving SA, Dandamudi P, Belongia EA, Daley MF, DeStefano F, Jackson LA, Jacobsen SJ, Kharbanda E, Klein NP, Weintraub E, Naleway AL. Incidence of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease within the Vaccine Safety Datalink network and evaluation of association with rotavirus vaccination Vaccine . 2021 Jun 16;39(27):3614-3620. Epub 2021 May 26.

Multiple studies in the last 20 years have reported an increase of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) in children. IBD is when the intestines become inflamed, which causes abdominal pain, cramping, and chronic diarrhea. The rotavirus vaccine, a routine pediatric immunization, contains a weakened form of rotavirus that can inflame the lining of the gut. This inflammation could potentially trigger IBD. Researchers wanted to study if there was a connection between pediatric IBD and rotavirus vaccination. From 2007 through 2016, over 2.4 million children ages 10 years and younger from the Vaccine Safety Datalink were included in the analysis. Of the 2.4 million, 333 cases of IBD were identified with rates of IBD higher in children ages 5 to 9 years. The analyzed data suggests there is a small increase of IBD overall in pediatrics with no connection with the rotavirus vaccine. Parents should make sure their children receive their scheduled vaccinations and talk to a healthcare provider about specific concerns.

Gubernot D, Jazwa A, Niu M, Baumblatt J, Gee J, Moro P, Duffy J, Harrington T, McNeil MM, Broder K, Su J, Kamidani S, Olson CK, Panagiotakopoulos L, Shimabukuro T, Forshee R, Anderson S, Bennet S. U.S. Population-Based background incidence rates of medical conditions for use in safety assessment of COVID-19 vaccines . Vaccine. 2021 Jun 23;39(28):3666-3677. Epub 2021 May 14.

Daley MF, Reifler LM, Shoup JA, Narwaney KJ, Kharbanda EO, Groom HC, Jackson ML, Jacobsen SJ, McLean HQ, Klein NP, Williams JTB, Weintraub ES, McNeil MM, Glanz JM. Temporal Trends in Undervaccination: a Population-Based Cohort Study Am J Prev Med . 2021 Jul;61(1):64-72. Epub 2021 Apr 30.

Kharbanda EO, Vazquez-Benitez G, DeSilva MB, Naleway AL, Klein NP, Hechter RC, Glanz JM, Donahue JG, Jackson LA, Sheth SS, Greenberg V, Panagiotakopoulos L, Mba-Jonas A, Lipkind HS. Association of Inadvertent 9-Valent Human Papillomavirus Vaccine in Pregnancy with Spontaneous Abortion and Adverse Birth Outcomes JAMA Netw Open .2021 Apr 1;4(4):e214340.

Woo EK, Moro PL. Postmarketing safety surveillance of quadrivalent recombinant influenza vaccine: Reports to the vaccine adverse event reporting system.   Vaccine. 2021 Mar 4;S0264-410X(21)00232-2. Epub ahead of print.

The recombinant hemagglutinin quadrivalent influenza vaccine (Flublok Quadrivalent; RIV4) was approved by FDA in October 2016 for persons 18 years and older to reduce the risk from flu and flu-related complications. To analyze the safety profile of RIV4 since its approval, researchers reviewed adverse events reported to VAERS. From July 1, 2017 through June 30, 2020, VAERS received 849 reports after RIV4 vaccination. A majority of reports (810; 95%) were non-serious; injection site reactions were reported most often. There were 131 reports of allergic reactions. A majority of allergic reactions (127) were reported as non-serious, but required immediate medical care. Reports of allergic reactions do not necessarily suggest that RIV4 is particularly allergenic; some individuals may have a hypersensitivity to drug or vaccine exposure. Among serious adverse event reports, there were 10 cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome. Overall, the analysis did not identify any new safety concerns of RIV4.

Perez-Vilar S, Hu M, Weintraub, Arya D, Lufkin B, Myers T, Woo EJ, Lo AC, Cho S, Swarr M, Liao J, Wernecke M, MaCurdy T, Kelman J, Anderson S, Duffy J, Forshee RA. Guillain-Barré Syndrome After High-Dose Influenza Vaccine Administration in the United States, 2018-2019 Flu Season J Infect Dis . 2021 Feb 13;223(3):416-425. Doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa543.

Su JR, McNeil MM, Welsh KJ, Marquez PL, Ng C, Yan M, Cano MV Myopericarditis after vaccination, Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 1990-2018 .  Vaccine . 2021 Jan 29; 39(5):839-845. Epub 2021 Jan 6.

Myopericarditis, an inflammation of the heart muscle and tissue around the heart, has many causes including viral infections. While not confirmed as a cause, myopericarditis after vaccination has been periodically reported. Researchers identified reports of myopericarditis following vaccination submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) from 1990–2018. During 1990–2018, VAERS received a total 620,195 reports: 708 (0.1%) met the case definition or were physician-diagnosed as myopericarditis. Most (79%) reports described males, 69% were serious, and 72% had symptom onset within 2 weeks of vaccination. Overall, smallpox (59%) and anthrax (23%) vaccines were most commonly reported, with higher reporting rates only after smallpox vaccine. Myopericarditis remains rarely reported after vaccines licensed for use in the United States. In this analysis, myopericarditis was most commonly reported after smallpox vaccine, and less commonly after other vaccines.

Moro PL, Marquez P. Reports of cell-based influenza vaccine administered during pregnancy in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2013-2020.   Vaccine. 2021 Jan 22;39(4):678-681. Epub 2020 Dec 25

Flucelvax (ccIIV3 or ccIIV4; ccIIV) was approved by FDA for use in persons aged 18 years and older. There are limited data on the safety of ccIIV in pregnant women or their infants. To assess the safety of ccIIV given during pregnancy, researchers searched VAERS for reports of adverse events (AEs) from July 1, 2013 through May 31, 2020. During that time, VAERS received 4,852 reports following ccIIV, and 391 reports included pregnant women (8%). Of those, 24 (6.1%) were classified as serious. Two neonatal deaths were reported; no maternal deaths occurred. Among the 340 reports with trimester information, ccIIV was administered during the second trimester in 170 (50%). The most frequently reported pregnancy-specific AE was premature delivery (85; 21.7%). There were 62 reports (15.9%) of low birth weight of infants and 15 report of birth defects. While these results are different than previous pregnancy reviews after inactivated influenza vaccines (IIV), no safety concerns were identified.

Kharbanda EO, Vazquez-Benitez G, DeSilva MB, Spaulding AB, Daley MF, Naleway AL, Irving SA, Klein NP, Tseng HF, Jackson LA, Hambridge SJ, Olaiya O, Panozzo CA, Myers TR, Romitti PA. Developing Algorithms for Identifying Major Structural Birth Defects Using Automated Electronic Health Data. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2021 Feb;30(2):266-274. Epub 2020 Dec 3.

Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) researchers often rely on electronic health records when conducting observational studies. To improve case identification, researchers use algorithms to accurately identify diagnoses for particular conditions or diseases. Algorithms used in previous studies for selected birth defects were based on International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes. In October 2015, the United States transitioned to the 10 th edition (ICD-10-CM). In this study, researchers updated, validated, and refined algorithms for use with ICD-10-CM codes. Final algorithms were applied to a group of live births delivered between October 2015 through September 2017 at 8 VSD sites and were compared to the original ICD-9-CM algorithms applied to a group of live births in 2004-2013. Results demonstrated that the new ICD-10-CM algorithms can be used for future studies of maternal vaccine safety.

Panagiotakopoulos L, McCarthy NL, Tepper NK, Kharbanda NK, Lipkind HS, Vazquez-Benitez G, McClure DL, Greenberg V, Getahun D, Glanz JM, Naleway AL, Klein NP, Nelson JC, Weintraub ES. Evaluating the Association of Stillbirths After Maternal Vaccination in the Vaccine Safety Datalink. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Dec;136(6):1086-1094.

The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends women receive vaccinations against flu and tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) during each pregnancy. Despite reassuring safety data, pregnant women often have concerns about the safety of vaccines for them and their babies. Researchers used the VSD to evaluate whether vaccinations given during pregnancy were associated with stillbirth (fetal death occurring on or after 20 weeks gestation). The study compared 795 stillbirths (confirmed with medical record review) and 3,180 live birth controls between September 30, 2015 and January 1, 2020. Researchers found 51.7% of stillbirth cases and 52.9% live birth controls were exposed to vaccines during pregnancy, including flu and Tdap vaccines. The findings show that vaccination during pregnancy did not increase the risk of stillbirth, including recommended, non-recommended, and contraindicated vaccines. Overall, the study results support the safety of ACIP recommendations during pregnancy.

Haber P, Tate J, Marquez PL, Moro PL, Parashar U. Safety Profile of rotavirus vaccines among individuals aged ≥8 months of age, United States, vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS), 2006-2019. Vaccine. 2020 Nov 29;S0264-410X(20)31466-3. Online ahead of print.

Two live oral rotavirus vaccines, RotaTeq (RV5) and Rotarix (RV1), were introduced into the routine vaccination program in 2006 and 2008, respectively. RV1 is administered at ages 2 and 4 months and RV5 is administered at ages 2, 4, and 6 months. The series is recommended prior to 8 months of age to decrease the risk of intussusception (IS), an intestinal obstruction common in younger children. However, there is limited safety data on the vaccines when given to children older than 8 months. Researchers in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) analyzed reports of adverse events (AEs) following rotavirus vaccination submitted January 2006 through December 2019. A total 344 reports were submitted: 309 reports included children 8 months to 5 years of age, and 35 reports included children 6 years and older. While known AEs were identified – diarrhea, fever and vomiting – no new or unexpected safety concerns were identified for those vaccinated beyond the recommended age.

Perez-Vilar S, Hu M, Weintraub E, Arya D, Lufkin B, Myers T, Woo EJ, Lo A, Chu S, Swarr M, Liao J, Wernecke M, MaCurdy T, Kelman J, Anderson S, Duffy J, Forshee RA. Guillain-Barré Syndrome After High-Dose Influenza Vaccine Administration in the United States, 2018–2019 Season J Infect Dis. 2020 Nov 2; jiaa543. Online ahead of print.

While an association between influenza vaccination and Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) was first noticed in 1976, studies in subsequent flu seasons have assessed the risk and found either no or small risk of GBS following influenza vaccination. Early during the 2018-2019 flu season, the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) identified a statistical signal for an increased risk of GBS in days 1–42 following high-dose influenza vaccine (IIV3-HD) administration. The signal was rapidly evaluated using Medicare data by conducting early- and end-of-season analyses. The Medicare analyses, which included more than 7 million IIV3-HD vaccinations, did not detect a statistically significant increased GBS risk. The VSD end-of-season analysis also did not find an increased GBS risk among more than 600,000 IIV3-HD vaccinations. These analyses determined that if a GBS risk existed, it was similar to that from prior seasons.

Duffy J, Marquez P, Dores GM, Ng C, Su J, Cano J, Perez-Vilar S. Safety Surveillance of bivalent meningococcal group B vaccine, Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, 2014-2018.   Open Forum Infec Dis. 2020 Oct 27. Online ahead of print.

Licensed in October 2014, MenB-FHbp was the first meningococcal group B vaccine approved for use in the United States. The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends the 3-dose series for individuals aged 10-25 years who are at an increased risk of meningococcal B disease. Researchers reviewed reports of adverse events (AEs) following MenB-FHbp submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) from October 2014 through December 2018. During this time period, VAERS received 2,106 reports involving MenB-FHbp, representing 698 reports per million doses distributed (over 3 million doses were distributed in this analysis period). The most common AEs reported were fever (27%), headache (25%), and pain (16%). Overall, the review did not identify any new safety issues. The most commonly reported AEs following MenB-FHbp were consistent with those identified in clinical trials as described in the package insert.

Miller ER, McNeil MM, Moro PL, Duffy J, Su JR. The reporting sensitivity of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) for anaphylaxis and for Guillain-Barré syndrome. Vaccine. 2020 Nov 3;38(47)7458-7463. Epub 2020 Oct 7.

Underreporting is an important limitation that is common to passive surveillance systems. The number of adverse events (AEs) that occur after vaccination and the percentage of those that get reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is unknown. To determine the sensitivity of VAERS in capturing AE reports, researchers analyzed pre-specified outcomes – anaphylaxis and Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) – reported to VAERS and determined if they are similar to previous estimates for other severe AEs. These estimates used were obtained from published studies of the Vaccine Safety Datalink of anaphylaxis and GBS following vaccination.  VAERS sensitivity for capturing anaphylaxis after seven different vaccines ranged from 13-76%; sensitivity for capturing GBS after three different vaccines ranged from 12-64%. For anaphylaxis and GBS, VAERS sensitivity is comparable to previous estimates for detecting important AEs following vaccination.

Panagiotakopoulos L, Myers TR, Gee J, Lipkind HS, Kharbanda EO, Ryan DO, Williams, JTB, Naleway AL, Klein NP, Hambridge SJ, Jacobsen SJ, Glanz JM, Jackson LA, Shimabukuro TT, Weintraub ES. SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Hospitalized Pregnant Women: Reasons for Admission and Pregnancy Characteristics – Eight U.S. Health Care Centers, March 1-May 30, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020;69:1355-1359. 2020 Sept 25.

As part of CDC surveillance of COVID-19 hospitalizations, Vaccine Safety Datalink researchers identified 105 pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection from March 1 through May 30, 2020. Of those, 43 (41%) were admitted for COVID-19 illness (e.g., worsening respiratory status) and 62 (59%) were admitted for pregnancy-related treatment or procedures (e.g, delivery) and identified with SARS-CoV-2 infection. More pregnant women with prepregnancy obesity and gestational diabetes were hospitalized for the treatment of COVID-19 illness than pregnant women admitted for pregnancy-related reasons. Intensive care was required in 30% (13/43) of pregnant women admitted for COVID-19 illness, and one pregnant woman died from COVID-19. Adverse birth outcomes, such as preterm delivery and stillbirth, were more common among pregnant women with SARS-CoV-2 infection, regardless of symptoms. Pregnant women should take preventive measures to protect themselves against SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Mbaeyi SA, Bozio CH, Duffy J, Rubin LG, Hariri S, Stephens DS, MacNeil JR. Meningococcal Vaccination: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, United States, 2020. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2020 Sept;69(No. RR-9):1-41.

This report compiles and summarizes all recommendations from CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) for use of meningococcal vaccines in the United States; it is intended for use by clinicians and public health providers. A systematic literature search was completed to review all available evidence on the immunogenicity, effectiveness, and safety of U.S. licensed quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate (MenACWY) and serogroup B meningococcal (MenB) vaccines among age groups for which the vaccines were approved. To further assess vaccine safety, data were evaluated from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD), two post-licensure surveillance systems for adverse events.

Myers TR, McNeil MM, NG CS, Li R, Marquez PL, Moro PL, Omer SB, Cano MV. Adverse Events Following Quadrivalent Meningococcal Diphtheria Toxoid Conjugate Vaccine (Menactra ®) Reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2005-2016. Vaccine. 2020 Sep 11;38(40):6291-6298 Epub 2020 Jul 31.

Licensed in January 2005, Menactra was the first quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccine approved to provide protection against invasive meningococcal disease. It is licensed for use in individuals aged 9 months through 55 years. Researchers reviewed reports of adverse events (AEs) after Menactra to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) from 2005-2016, including serious reports, selected pre-specified outcomes, and use during pregnancy. From January 2005 thought June 2019, VAERS received 13,075 reports of AEs following Menactra vaccination. Most reports (94%) were classified as non-serious; commonly reported AEs included injection site redness and swelling, fever, headache, and dizziness. There were 36 reports of death following Menactra; researchers did not find any evidence to suggest the vaccine caused the deaths. This review did not reveal any new safety concerns and provides further reassurance regarding the safety of Menactra.

Moro PL, Woo EL, Marquez P, Cano M. Monitoring the safety of high-dose, trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in the vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS), 2011-2019. Vaccine. 2020 Aug 18;38(37):5923-5926. Epub 2020 Jul 21.

Older adults are at higher risk of developing serious complications from flu. In December 2009, the high-dose trivalent influenza vaccine (IIV3-HD) was licensed for adults 65 years and older. Using the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, researchers analyzed the 12,320 reports submitted after IIV3-HD vaccination from 2011-2019. Of the total, there were 61 reports of GBS and 13 of anaphylaxis. Nearly 6% of all reports were classified as serious (723). The most commonly reported serious events were fever (30.2%), weakness (28.9%), and shortness of breath (24.9%). There were 55 reports of death following IIV3-HD, and cause of deaths reported were typical for those in this age group with no evidence to suggest the vaccine caused the deaths. There were reports of 13 pregnant women and 59 children who inadvertently received IIV3-HD. Overall, this review of IIV3-HD did not reveal any new safety concerns among individual adults 65 years and older.

Wang SV, Stefanini K, Lewis E, Newcomer SR, Fireman B, Daley MF, Glanz JM, Duffy J, Weintraub E, Kulldorf M. Determining Which of Several Simultaneously Administered Vaccines Increase Risk of an Adverse Event Drug Saf. 2020 Oct;43(10):1057-1065. Epub 2020 Jul 1.

The CDC childhood immunization schedule recommends all children get vaccinated. Children may get multiple vaccinations on the same day. If a child has an adverse event after getting multiple vaccinations, it would be difficult to determine which vaccine, if any, caused the event. Using observed data from two Vaccine Safety Datalink sites, researchers developed a systematic process to determine which of the simultaneously administered vaccine(s) are most likely to have caused an observed increase in risk of an adverse event. From the five scenarios simulated, the process determined which of the vaccines contributed to the simulated excess risk. This process could be used again in the future to provide valuable information on the potential risk of adverse events following individual and simultaneous vaccinations.

Hesse EM, Navarro RA, Daley MF, Getahun D, Henninger ML, Jackson LA, Nordin J, Olson SC, Zerbo O, Zheng C, Duffy J. Risk for Subdeltoid Bursitis After Influenza Vaccination: A Population-Based Cohort Study Ann Intern Med. 2020 Aug 18;173(4):253-261. Epub 2020 Jun 23.

Subdeltoid bursitis, characterized by pain or loss of motion in the shoulder, has been reported as an adverse event following intramuscular vaccination in the upper arm, and most case reports involved the influenza vaccine. With over 160 million U.S. doses distributed annually and recommended to everyone over 6 months of age, researchers wanted to estimate the risk of subdeltoid bursitis following influenza vaccination. In this cohort study using data from 7 Vaccine Safety Datalink sites, researchers included people who received an inactivated influenza vaccine during the 2016–2017 flu season, totaling 2.9 million people. The analysis to calculate risk of bursitis compared cases that appeared 3 days following vaccination to a control period 30-60 days following vaccination. There were an estimated 7.78 (95% CI 2.19-13.38) additional cases of bursitis per one million people vaccinated. While an increased risk of bursitis following vaccination was present, the overall risk was small.

Hause AM, Panagiotakopoulos L, Weintraub E, Sy LS, Glenn SC, Tseng HF, McNeil MM. Adverse Outcomes in Pregnant Women Hospitalized with Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection: A Case-Series Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jun 2; ciaa668. Online ahead of print.

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a common respiratory virus that usually causes mild, cold-like symptoms and can be serious for infants and older adults. RSV infection in pregnant women has not been well described and can be clinically severe and result in hospitalization. CDC has emphasized the need to characterize RSV infection during pregnancy, including burden of the illness, risk factors for severe disease, and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. In this study, researchers identified 25 pregnant women at Kaiser Permanente Southern California who tested positive for RSV. Ten of those women (40%) were hospitalized: five were diagnosed with pneumonia/atelectasis, two with respiratory failure (one requiring mechanical ventilation), and two with sepsis. Six women had a pregnancy complication during hospitalization, including one induced preterm birth. The information from this study may inform the benefits of maternal vaccination for an RSV vaccine intended to protect infants.

Suragh TA, Hibbs B, Marquez P, McNeil MM. Age inappropriate influenza vaccination in infants less than 6 months old, 2010-2018 Vaccine. 2020 May 6;38(21):3747-3751. Epub Apr 6.

Annual influenza (flu) vaccination is recommended for everyone 6 months or older, and vaccination in infants less than 6 months old is a vaccine error. There are few safety studies in this population. Researchers searched the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) for reports of adverse events (AEs) following flu vaccination in infants less than 6 months old from 2010-2018. A total of 114 reports were found; 21 reported a specific AE. Fever, irritability, crying and diarrhea were the most common symptoms. Researchers identified several risk factors: 1) individuals getting vaccinated together resulting in patient mix-ups, 2) healthcare provider not verifying the patient’s information, and 3) provider confusion due to similarities in vaccines’ packaging and names of vaccines that sound alike. This study adds valuable information about the general absence of serious AEs in infants vaccinated with flu vaccine; yet, providers should be vigilant to avoid these preventable errors.

Glanz JM, Clarke CL, Xu S, Daley MF, Shoup JA, Schroeder EB, Lewin BL, McClure DL, Kharbanda E, Klein NP, DeStefano F. Association between Rotavirus Vaccine and Type 1 Diabetes in Children. JAMA Pediatr. 2020 May 1;174(5):455-462. Epub 2020 Mar 9.

Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is an autoimmune disease that tends to occur in genetically susceptible individuals and is primarily diagnosed during childhood. Previous research suggests that a live attenuated rotavirus vaccine could either increase or decrease the risk of T1DM in early childhood. Researchers conducted a study of children enrolled in 7 integrated healthcare organizations in the Vaccine Safety Datalink. There were 386,937 children enrolled born between 2006 and 2014. During their infancy, 360,169 children were exposed to the full series of rotavirus vaccination, 15,765 partially exposed and 11,003 unexposed. By the end of 2017, 464 children had developed T1DM. The incidence of T1DM was not significantly different across the vaccination groups, indicating that rotavirus vaccination is not associated with T1DM in children.

Hause AM, Hesse EM, Ng C, Marquez P, McNeil MM, Omer SB. Association Between Vaccine Exemption Policy Change in California and Adverse Event Reporting. Pediatr Infec Dis J., May; 39(5):369-373. Epub 2020 Mar 5.

California Senate Bill 277 (SB277) eliminated non-medical immunization exemptions starting February 19, 2015. Since the bill’s introduction, the rate of medical exemptions in the state has increased. There is a perception that filing a report to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) may aid in applying for a medical exemption. Researchers wanted to describe trends of reporting to VAERS after SB277. From June 2011-July 2018, 6,703 VAERS reports were submitted from California. Parent-submitted reports increased after SB277, from 14% to 23%. The median reporting time by parents increased from 9 days post-vaccination in 2013-2014 to 31 days in 2016-2017. Overall, there was an increase in reports submitted more than 6 months post-vaccination and reports describing behavioral and developmental symptoms. These changes in reporting patterns after SB277’s implementation may indicate more parents are using VAERS to assist in applying for a medical exemption for their child.

Newcomer SR, Daley MF, Marwaney KJ, Xu S, DeStefano F, Groom HC, Jackson ML, Lewin BJ, McLean HQ, Nordin JD, Zerbo O, Glanz JM. Order of Live and Inactivated Vaccines and Risk of Non-vaccine-targeted Infections in US Children 11-23 Months of Age. Pediatr Infect Dis J., 2020 Mar:39(3);247-253.

Children in the United States receive up to 28 vaccine doses against 14 diseases before their 2nd birthday and 3 are live vaccines. Some observational studies suggest that receiving live vaccines may be associated with decreased non-vaccine targeted infection (NVTI) risk. Researchers conducted a retrospective study within the Vaccine Safety Datalink to estimate the risk of NVTIs based on most recent vaccine type received in children 11-23 months of age. Electronic health records and immunization data were reviewed from children born between 2003-2013. Among 428,608 children, 4.9% had more than 1 immunization visit with live vaccines only and 10.3% had a NVTI. Researchers observed modest associations between live vaccine receipt and a decreased risk of NVTIs, which may have been influenced by multiple factors, including healthcare-seeking behavior. In total, the results support the current sequence of live and inactivated vaccines in the U.S. vaccine schedule with respect to NVTI.

Walter EB, Klein NP, Wodi AP, Roundtree W, Todd CA, Wiesner A, Duffy J, Marquez PL, Broder K. Fever after Influenza, Diphtheria-Tetanus-Acellular Pertussis, and Pneumococcal Vaccinations. Pediatrics . 2020 Mar;145(3):e20191909.

A previous CDC study showed that children aged 6-23 months had an increased risk for febrile seizure after simultaneously receiving inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV), pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) and diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccine (DTaP). Researchers wanted to see if administering the IIV at a separate visit reduced the risk of post-vaccination fever and potentially febrile seizure. In the 2017-2018 influenza season, 221 children aged 12-16 months were randomized at two CISA sites into 2 groups. Both groups had 2 visits, 2 weeks apart: group 1 (simultaneous) received the PCV13, DTaP, and quadrivalent IIV (IIV4) vaccines at visit 1; no vaccines at visit 2. Group 2 (sequential) received PCV13 and DTaP at visit 1 and IIV4 visit 2. Similar proportions of children in both groups had fever on days 1-2 after visits (simultaneous 8.1%; sequential 9.3%). Delaying IIV4 by 2 weeks in children receiving DTaP and PCV13 did not reduce fever occurrence after vaccination.

Havers FP, Moro PL, Hunter P, Hariri S, Bernstein H. Use of Tetanus Toxoid, Reduced Diphtheria Toxoid and Acellular Pertussis Vaccines: Updated Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices – United States, 2019.   MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Jan;69:77-83..

In 2005, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommended a single dose of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine for adolescents and adults. After the initial Tdap vaccine, booster doses of tetanus and diphtheria toxoids (Td) vaccine are recommended every 10 years or when indicated for wound management. During the October 2019 meeting, ACIP updated its recommendation to allow the use of Tdap or Td in situations where only Td was recommended. These situations include the tetanus booster recommended for adults every 10 years, tetanus prophylaxis when indicated for wound management in people who previously received Tdap, and for multiple doses in the catch-up immunization schedule for people 7 years of age and older with an unknown or incomplete vaccination history. This recommendation update allows providers to have flexibility at the point-of-care for patients.

Haber P, Moro PL, Ng C, Dores GM, Perez-Vilar S, Marquez PL, Cano M. Safety review of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, acellular pertussis vaccines (Tdap) in adults aged ≥ 65 years, Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), United States, September 2010 – December 2018. Vaccine. . 2020 Feb 5;38(6):1476-1480. Epub 2019 Dec 28.

The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommends vaccination in adults 65 years of age and older with tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap). To date, few studies have assessed the safety of Tdap in this age group. Using the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), researchers analyzed reports of adverse events (AEs) following Tdap in adults 65 years and older. From September 2010 to December 2018, VAERS received 1,798 reports; 94% were classified as non-serious. The most common AEs were injection site redness (26%), pain (19%), and swelling (18%). Of 104 serious reports, 7 deaths were reported; none had evidence to suggest the vaccine caused the deaths. Serious non-death reports included nervous system disorders (35.1%; n=34) and infections (18.6%; n=18). Overall, the analysis did not identify any new safety concerns and is consistent with prior post-marketing observations and pre-licensure studies.

Li R, Stewart B, Rose C. A Bayesian approach to sequential analysis in post-licensure vaccine safety surveillance. Pharm Stat. 2020 May;19(3):291-302 Epub 2019 Dec 22.

Bayesian statistics is an approach for learning from evidence as it accumulates. While this analytic method is used in other areas of public health with acknowledged practical benefits, its potential application in vaccine safety monitoring analysis has not been fully realized. In this study, researchers compare the use of a traditional (frequentist) sequential method and a Bayesian method, with simulations and a real-world vaccine safety example. The performance was evaluated using 3 metrics: false positive rate, false negative rate, and average earliest detection time. The authors found that depending on the background rate of adverse events, the Bayesian sequential method could significantly improve performance in terms of the false negative rate and decrease the earliest time to producing a safety signal for further analysis. Overall, the Bayesian sequential approach was found to show promise as an alternative for vaccine safety monitoring.

Su JR, Haber P, Ng CS, Marquez PL, Dores GM, Perez-Vilar S, Cano MV . Erythema multiforme, Stevens Johnson syndrome, and toxic epidermal necrolysis reported after vaccination, 1999-2017. Vaccine . 2020 Feb 11;38(7): 1746-1752. Epub 2019 Dec 20.

While some dermatologic adverse events are common after vaccination (i.e. redness at the injection site), erythema multiforme (EM), Stevens Johnson Syndrome (SJS), Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN), and SJS/TEN are rare. Since the last review of VAERS data for these conditions, over 37 new vaccines were approved for use in the United States. Of the 466,027 reports to VAERS during 1999–2017, researchers identified and reviewed 984 reports of EM, 89 of SJS, 6 of SJS/TEN, and 7 of TEN. Most reports of EM (91%) were non-serious; 52% of SJS and all reports of SJS/TEN and TEN were serious. Most reports (58%) occurred within 7 days after vaccination. Childhood vaccines were reported most often; 48% of reports were of children younger than 4 years. Of 6 reported deaths, 5 were exposed or potentially exposed to medications known to cause these conditions, and 1 had severe dehydration. Overall, reporting of these conditions after vaccination remained rare, with no new safety concerns identified.

Yu W, Zheng C, Xie F, Chen W, Mercado C, Sy LS, Qian L, Glenn S, Tseng HF, Lee G, Duffy J, McNeil MM, Daley MF, Crane B, McLean HQ, Jackson LA, Jacobsen SJ. The use of natural language processing to identify vaccine-related anaphylaxis at five health care systems in the Vaccine Safety Datalink. Pharmacoepidemiolo Drug Saf. 2020 Feb;29(2): 182-188 Epub 2019 Dec 3.

Anaphylaxis is a rare but serious allergic reaction that can be caused by various triggers, including vaccine components. Natural language processing (NLP) uses computers to analyze large amounts of text. Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) researchers developed an NLP application to identify vaccine-related anaphylaxis cases from electronic medical record notes and implemented the method at 5 VSD sites. The NLP system was trained on a dataset of 311 potential anaphylaxis cases and validated on another 731 potential cases. NLP was then applied to the notes of 6.4 million vaccinated patients, and it captured 8 additional true cases confirmed by manual chart review. This study demonstrated the potential to apply NLP to clinical notes to identify anaphylaxis cases and its use to improve sensitivity and efficiency in future vaccine safety studies.

Hesse EM, Atanasoff S, Hibbs BF, Adegoke OJ, Ng C, Marquez P, Osborn M, Su JR, Moro PL, Shimabukuro T, Nair N. Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (SIRVA): Petition Claims to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 2010-2016. Vaccine. 2020 Jan 29;38(5): 1076-1083. Epub 2019 Nov 28.

Petitioner claims for shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (SIRVA) to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) increased substantially from 2010 to 2016. The Health Resources and Services Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention initiated a joint scientific review of clinical characteristics of SIRVA petitions to VICP. Researchers queried VICP’s Injury Compensation System database for alleged SIRVA and SIRVA-like injuries and conducted a descriptive analysis of claims recommended by VICP for concession as SIRVA injuries; 476 claims were identified and 400 of them involved influenza vaccine. Of the 476 claims, 227 reported a suspected administration error; 172 reported ‘injection too high’ on the arm. Injection too high on the arm could be a factor due to the risk of injecting into underlying non-muscular tissues. Healthcare providers should be aware of proper injection technique and anatomical landmarks when administering vaccines.

Hibbs BF, Ng CS, Museru O, Moro PL, Marquez P, Woo EJ, Cano MV, Shimabukuro TT. Reports of atypical shoulder pain and dysfunction following inactivated influenza vaccine, Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2010-2017. Vaccine. 2020 Jan 29;38(5):1137-1143. Epub 2019 Nov 26.

Some case reports have suggested that if inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) is improperly administered, shoulder dysfunction may occur. Researchers reviewed reports of adverse events (AEs) made to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) following IIV from July 2010 to June 2017. During this time, approximately 996 million flu vaccine doses were distributed in the United States. Of the 59,230 reports submitted, 1,220 met analysis criteria of atypical shoulder pain and dysfunction starting within 48 hours following IIV and continuing for more than 1 week. The analysis suggests these reports were not common, averaging 2% of flu vaccine AEs reported each year; most were females (82.6%), median age was 52 years. While the cause of these cases is unknown, vaccines given improperly might be a factor. Proper vaccine administration education and training are preventive measures.

Donahue JG, Kieke BA, Lewis EM, Weintraub ES, Hanson KE, McClure DL, Vickers ER, Gee J, Daley MF, Destefano F, Hechter RC, Jackson LA, Klein NP, Naleway AL, Nelson JC, Belongia EA. Near Real-Time Surveillance to Assess the Safety of the 9-valent Human Papillomavirus Vaccine. Pediatrics. 2019 Dec; 144(6): e20191808. Epub 2019 Nov 18.

Gardasil 9 (human papillomavirus 9-valent vaccine, recombinant; 9vHPV) was approved in 2014 for females and males to protect against 9 types of human papillomavirus infections that can cause cancer. CDC’s Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) conducted near real-time post-licensure safety monitoring following 9vHPV for 11 pre-specified adverse events (AEs), including anaphylaxis, allergic reaction, appendicitis, certain neurological disorders, pancreatitis, and stroke. From October 2015 to October 2017, 838,991 9vHPV doses were administered to people aged 9-26 years at 6 VSD sites. Statistical signals were detected for 2 expected AEs: injection site reactions and syncope. Signals were also detected for appendicitis, pancreatitis, and allergic reaction; however, evaluation and medical record reviews did not confirm these to be true associations. Overall, no new safety concerns were identified. The results are consistent with pre-licensure clinical trial data and support the favorable safety profile of 9vHPV.

Shimabukuro TT, Su JR, Marquez PL, Mba-Jonas A, Arana JE, Cano MV. Safety of the 9-Valent Human Papillomavirus Vaccine. Pediatrics 2019 Dec; 144(6). pii: e20191791. Epub 2019 Nov 18.

Gardasil 9 (human papillomavirus 9-valent vaccine, recombinant; 9vHPV) was approved in 2014 for females and males to protect against 9 types of human papillomavirus infections that can cause cancer. Researchers analyzed reports of adverse events (AEs) after 9vHPV to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) from December 2014 to December 2017. During that time, approximately 28 million 9vHPV doses were distributed in the United States. Of the 7,244 reports received, 31% were female, nearly 22% were male, and 47% of reports did not identify gender. Over 97% of reports were classified as non-serious. There were 2 deaths reported; no information in the reports or medical records suggested the deaths were related to vaccination. Overall, the analysis revealed no new or unexpected safety concerns. The 9vHPV safety profile is consistent with pre-licensure clinical trial data, and with the post-marketing safety data of Gardasil, the earlier quadrivalent HPV vaccine.

Moro PL, McNeil MM. Challenges in evaluating post-licensure vaccine safety: observations from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2019 Oct; 18(10): 1091-1101 Epub 2019 Oct 19.

There is overwhelming scientific evidence that supports the safety of vaccines and their proven ability to prevent illness and death caused by infectious diseases. Yet like any medicine, no vaccine can be considered completely safe and completely effective. Prior to licensure, vaccines undergo extensive safety and efficacy evaluations. After licensure, they require follow up studies and continuous monitoring to investigate any new or unexpected adverse events (AEs). This article presents challenges in monitoring U.S. vaccines for AEs after licensure and describes CDC’s post-licensure safety surveillance infrastructure, including the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, the Vaccine Safety Datalink, and the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment project. The authors describe each system’s unique strengths and limitations, and the harmonized approach they provide in meeting vaccine safety monitoring challenges.

Groom HC, Smith N, Irving SA, Koppolu P, Vazquez-Benitez G, Kharbanda EO, Daley MF, Donahue JG, Getahun D, Jackson LA, Klein NP, McCarthy NL, Nordin JD, Panagiotakopoulos L, Naleway AL. Uptake and safety of hepatitis A vaccination during pregnancy: A Vaccine Safety Datalink study. Vaccine . 2019 Oct 16;37(44):6648-6655. Epub 2019 Sep 20.

Although uncommon, infection with hepatitis A virus during pregnancy is associated with gestational complications and pre-term labor. CDC recommends that pregnant women who are at an increased risk of contracting hepatitis A get the Hepatitis A vaccine (HepA). Current safety data, however, are limited on maternal HepA vaccination. Researchers used the Vaccine Safety Datalink to compare pregnancies with HepA exposure to other vaccine exposures, and those with no exposure, from 2004-2015. Of nearly 667,000 pregnancies, 1,140 had HepA exposure. The rate of maternal HepA vaccination was low, and rarely due to documented risk factors. The results did not show an increased risk of adverse events for HepA vaccination during pregnancy. There was an identified association of maternal HepA exposure and small-for-gestational age (SGA) infants, however, the difference in rates were small (4%), and likely due to other factors. Further research may be needed to further explore this association.

McNeil MM, Paradowska-Stankiewicz I, Miller ER, Marquez PL, Seshadri S, Collins LC Jr, Cano MV. Adverse events following adenovirus type 4 and type 7 vaccine, live, oral in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), United States, October 2011-July 2018. Vaccine . 2019 Oct 16; 37(44): 6760-6767 Epub 2019 Sep 20.

Adenovirus vaccine (adenovirus type 4 and type 7, live, oral) was licensed by FDA in March 2011 for use in U.S. military personnel ages 17-50 years. The vaccine was first routinely given to recruits in October 2011. Researchers reviewed reports of adverse events (AEs) following the adenovirus vaccine from October 2011 to July 2018 using the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). VAERS received 100 adverse event reports; 39 were considered serious. While the reporting rate for serious AEs was higher than with other vaccines given in a comparison recruit population (39% versus 18%), no unexpected or concerning pattern of adenovirus vaccine AEs were identified. Reports showed multiple other vaccines (95%) and penicillin G (50%) were given at the same time, and these exposures may have contributed to the higher reporting rate for serious AEs observed with the adenovirus vaccine. Future studies without these exposures would be helpful in clarifying the vaccine’s safety profile.

Donahue JG, Kieke BA, King JP, Mascola MA, Shimabukuro TT, DeStefano F, Hanson KE, McClure DL, Olaiya O, Glanz JM, Hechter RC, Irving SA, Jackson LA, Klein NP, Naleway AL, Weintraub ES, Belongia EA. Inactivated influenza vaccine and spontaneous abortion in the Vaccine Safety Datalink in 2012-13, 2013-14, and 2014-15. Vaccine. 2019 Oct 16;37(44):6673-6681. Epub 2019 Sep 17.

A prior study in the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) covering the two influenza seasons from 2010-2012 reported an association between inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) and spontaneous abortion (SAB), but only among women who had also been vaccinated in the previous influenza season. In follow-up, VSD researchers conducted a larger case-control study over three more recent influenza seasons (2012-2015). Women with SAB were matched with women who had live births according to VSD site, influenza vaccination status in the previous influenza season, and other factors. The main analysis included 1,236 women. During the three influenza seasons, researchers found no association between IIV and SAB, including among women vaccinated in the previous season. These findings lend support to current recommendations for influenza vaccination at any time during pregnancy, including the first trimester.

Kochhar S, Excler JL, Bok K, Gurwith M, McNeil MM, Seligman SJ, Khuri-Bulos N, Klug B, Laderoute M, Robertson JS, Singh V, Brighton Collaboration Viral Vector Vaccines Safety Working Group (V3SWG). Defining the Interval for Monitoring Potential Adverse Events Following Immunization (AEFIs) After Receipt of Live Viral Vectored Vaccines. Vaccine. 2019 Sep 10;37(38): 5796-5802.

New viral vector vaccines that use live viruses to create an immune response are being developed to fight serious infectious agents like HIV and Ebola. As some live recombinant vectored vaccines may replicate, a key challenge is defining the length of time for monitoring potential adverse events following immunization (AEFI). Potential options include: 1) adapting from the current relevant regulatory guidelines; 2) convening a panel of experts to review the evidence from a systematic literature search to narrow down a list of likely potential or known AEFI and establish the optimal risk window(s); and 3) conducting “near real-time” prospective monitoring for unknown clustering’s of AEFI in validated large linked vaccine safety databases. Depending on the infrastructure, human resources, and databases available in different countries, the authors suggest appropriate options can be determined by regulatory agencies and investigators.

Christianson MS, Wodi P, Talaat K, Halsey N. Primary Ovarian Insufficiency and Human Papilloma Virus Vaccines: A Review of the Current Evidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol . 2020 Mar;222(3):239-244. Epub 2019 Aug 31.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the primary cause of cervical cancer, and vaccination is the primary means of preventing cancers caused by HPV infection. Despite HPV vaccine being available for over a decade, coverage rates are lower than other vaccines. Public concerns regarding the vaccine’s safety, including that it may cause primary ovarian insufficiency (POI), have been identified as an important barrier to vaccination. POI-related concerns are driven in part by isolated reports of ovarian failure following the HPV vaccine. In this Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment Project review, researchers summarize published peer-reviewed literature on HPV vaccines and POI. In summary, the current evidence is insufficient to suggest or support a causal relationship between HPV vaccination and POI. Healthcare providers can help address concerns about POI and the HPV vaccine by sharing these findings during consultations with their patients.

DeStefano F, Monk Bodenstab H, Offit PA. Principal Controversies in Vaccine Safety in the United States. Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Aug 1;69(4):726-731.

Concerns about vaccine safety can lead to decreased acceptance of vaccines and resurgence of vaccine-preventable diseases. The authors summarize the key evidence on some of the main current vaccine safety controversies in the United States, including: 1) MMR vaccine and autism; 2) thimerosal, a mercury-based vaccine preservative, and the risk of neurodevelopmental disorders; 3) vaccine-induced Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS); 4) vaccine-induced autoimmune diseases; 5) safety of HPV vaccine; 6) aluminum adjuvant-induced autoimmune diseases and other disorders; and 7) too many vaccines given early in life predisposing children to health and developmental problems. A possible small increased risk of GBS following influenza vaccination has been identified, but the magnitude of the increase is less than the risk of GBS following influenza infection. Otherwise, the biological and epidemiologic evidence does not support any of the reviewed vaccine safety concerns.

McNeil MM. Vaccine-Associated Anaphylaxis. Curr Treat Options Allergy. 2019 Sep; 6(3): 297-308. Epub 2019 Jul 16.

Anaphylaxis is a rare, serious hypersensitivity reaction, which can happen within minutes and is characterized by multisystem involvement. Although anaphylaxis may occur after any vaccine, the risk following flu vaccines is important to understand due to the large number of persons vaccinated annually. This review looks at two recent CDC studies that confirm its rarity. In a 25-year review of data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, reports in children most commonly followed childhood vaccinations, and in adults most often followed influenza vaccine. In a Vaccine Safety Datalink study, the estimated incidence of anaphylaxis was 1.3 per million vaccine doses administered for all vaccines and 1.6 per million doses for IIV3 (trivalent) influenza vaccine. Despite its rarity, the rapid onset and potentially lethal nature of anaphylaxis requires that all personnel and facilities providing vaccinations have procedures in place to treat it.

Edwards K, Hanquet G, Black S, Mignot E, Jankosky C, Shimabukuro T, Miller E, Nohynek H, Neels P. Meeting Report Narcolepsy and Pandemic Influenza Vaccination: What We Know and What We Need to Know Before the Next Pandemic? A Report From the 2 nd IABS Meeting. Biologicals. 2019 Jul;60:1-7.

Scientific and public health experts and key stakeholders gathered to discuss the state of knowledge on the relationship between adjuvanted monovalent pH1N1 vaccines and narcolepsy. There was consensus that an increased risk of narcolepsy was consistently observed after Pandemrix (AS03-adjuvanted), but similar associations following Arepanrix (AS03) or Focetria (MF59) were not observed. It is not clear whether the differences are due to vaccine composition or other factors such as the timing of large-scale vaccination programs relative to pH1N1 wild-type virus circulation in different geographic regions. Limitations of retrospective observational methodologies could also be contributing to some of the differences across studies. Additional research is needed to further explain the association and possible mechanistic pathways, and to aid in planning and preparation for vaccination programs in advance of the next influenza pandemic.

Hesse EM, Hibbs BF, Cano MV. Notes from the Field: Administration of Expired Injectable Influenza Vaccines Reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System — United States, July 2018–March 2019.   MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019; 68: 529–530. 2019 June 14.

During the 2018-2019 flu season, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System received 125 reports (totaling 192 patients) of people receiving expired inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV). During that time, 169.1 million doses of seasonal flu vaccine were distributed. Of those who received the expired IIV, 70% were in high-risks group for influenza (under the age of 5, over the age of 50 and pregnant women). Researchers found the reported adverse events were consistent with adverse events following administration of non-expired seasonal IIV, suggesting no additional safety issues associated with receipt of expired IIV. To avoid inadvertent administration of expired IIV, CDC recommends facilities that administer vaccines follow the guidance in the Vaccine Storage and Handling Toolkit, and make plans for the safe disposal or return of any remaining IIV after the expiration date of June 30 each year.

Weinmann S, Naleway AL, Koppolu P, Baxter R, Belongia EA, Hambidge SJ, Irving SA, Jackson ML, Lewin B, Liles E, Marin M, Smith N, Weintraub E, Chun C. Incidence of Herpes Zoster Among Children: 2003-2014. Pediatrics. 2019 Jul; 144(1). Pii: e20182917. Epub 2019 Jun 10.

After the 1996 introduction of routine varicella (chickenpox) vaccination in the U.S., most studies evaluating the incidence of pediatric herpes zoster (HZ), also known as shingles, reported lower incidence over time, with varying degrees of decline. Researchers used data from 6 integrated health care organizations surveyed by the Vaccine Safety Datalink to examine HZ incidence rate in children from 2003-2014. Using electronic medical records from children aged 0 to 17 years, researchers identified HZ cases and calculated HZ incidence rates for all children and children who were vaccinated versus unvaccinated. Researchers then calculated rates for the 12-year period, examined temporal trends, and compared HZ rates by month and year of age at vaccination. This population-based study confirms the decline in pediatric HZ incidence and the significantly lower incidence among children who are vaccinated, and reinforces the benefit of routine varicella vaccination to prevent pediatric HZ.

Moro PL, Arana J, Marquez PL, Ng C, Barash F, Hibbs BF, Cano M. Is there any harm in administering extra-doses of vaccine to a person? Excess doses of vaccine reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2007-2017. Vaccine. 2019 Jun 19; 37(28): 3730-3734. Epub 2019 May 30.

The administration of an extra dose of a vaccine may occur due to a vaccination error or when there is need to provide immunization in a person with uncertain vaccination histories (e.g., refugees). There is little data available on the safety of an extra dose of vaccine. Researchers searched for adverse events following the administration of excess doses of vaccines using the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System from January 2007 through the end of July 2017. Of 366,815 total reports received, over 5,000 (1.4%) reported an excess dose of vaccine was administered and less than 4,000 (76.9%) did not describe an AE. The top two vaccines reported were trivalent inactivated influenza (15.4%), and varicella (13.9%). The most common events were fever (12.8%), and injection site reaction (9.7%). Among reports where an AE was reported, researchers did not observe any unexpected conditions or clustering of AEs.

Hanson KE, McLean HQ, Belongia EA, Stokley S, McNeil MM, Gee J, VanWormer JJ. Sociodemograhic and clinical correlates of human papillomavirus vaccine attitudes and receipt among Wisconsin adolescents. Papillomavirus Res. 2019 Dec; 8: 100168; Epub 2019 May 25.

Few studies have assessed adolescent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine attitudes and whether they are associated with vaccination uptake. The Vaccine Safety Datalink conducted an HPV vaccine study in an integrated healthcare system to identify factors associated with adolescents’ attitude changes and their link to vaccine receipt. Adolescents who had not completed the HPV vaccine series were surveyed using a modified version of the Carolina HPV Immunization Attitudes and Beliefs Scale before and during a campaign to improve HPV vaccination rates. Adolescents’ attitudes to HPV slightly improved during the period of the campaign. However, attitude changes were not associated with receipt of HPV vaccines and adolescents identified as opposed to HPV vaccine before the campaign began were less likely to receive a HPV vaccine dose afterwards. More research is needed to learn how HPV vaccine attitudes form in parents and children, and how best to address concerns about vaccine harms.

Kochhar S, Edwards KM, Ropero Alvarez AM, Moro PL, Ortiz JR. Introduction of new vaccines for immunization in pregnancy – Programmatic, regulatory, safety and ethical considerations . Vaccine . 2019 May 31; 37(25): 3267-3277. Epub 2019 May 6.

Women are encouraged to get immunizations when they are pregnant; but in certain areas of the world, there are no programs to implement vaccine recommendations. Maternal immunization is a promising strategy to reduce infectious disease-related illness and death in pregnant women and their infants. Pre-requisites for introducing immunization during pregnancy include: (1) political commitment and adequate financial resources, (2) healthcare workers to deliver vaccines, (3) combining immunization programs with prenatal care and maternal/child health services, and (4) access to prenatal care for pregnant women in low and middle-income countries where births occur in healthcare facilities. A system to advance a vaccine program from product licensure to successful country-level implementation needs to include evidence of anticipated vaccine program impact, developing supportive policies, and translating policies into local action.

Hechter RC, Qian L, Tartof SY, Sy LS, Klein NP, Weintraub E, Mercado C, Naleway A, McLean HQ, Jacobsen SJ. Vaccine safety in HIV-infected adults within the Vaccine Safety Datalink Project . Vaccine. 2019 May 31; 37(25): 3296-3302. Epub 2019 May 4.

Despite the increased risk of vaccine-preventable infectious diseases in adults with HIV, vaccine coverage among this risk group remains low; safety concerns around side effects or impact on HIV disease may be a factor. Using data from 5 U.S. integrated healthcare sites in the Vaccine Safety Datalink, researchers evaluated the safety of recommended vaccinations among HIV-infected adults. They evaluated 20,417 HIV-infected adults from 2002-2013 and found an elevated risk of cellulitis and infection, particularly among patients with high viral load and those who received bacterial vaccines. These findings were consistent with prior reports in the literature. The analysis did not find an increased risk of other adverse events of interest. Patients with HIV with very high viral load might have elevated risk for stroke and cerebrovascular diseases; future research should examine further. Overall, this study reassures that vaccines currently recommended for HIV-infected adults are safe.

Cook AJ, Wellman RD, Marsh T, Shoaibi A, Tiwari R, Nguyen M, Boudreau D, Weintraub ES, Jackson L, Nelson JS. Applying sequential surveillance methods that use regression adjustment or weighting to control confounding in a multisite, rare-event, distributed setting: Part 2 in-depth example of a reanalysis of the measles-mumps-rubella-varicella combination vaccine and seizure risk. J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Sep; 113: 114-122. Epub 2019 May 2.

Safety surveillance of newly marketed vaccines is a public health priority. National systems have linked vast amounts of electronic health record (EHR) data across multiple health care organizations and insurers. This allows monitoring of large patient groups for potential safety concerns. Group sequential methods (methods of evaluating data as it is entered) involve routine estimation and testing of vaccine-outcome associations over time. This method can lead to earlier identification of excess risk compared with one-time analysis. Researchers assessed the use of two different sequential methods for safety monitoring: analysis-based confounder adjustment (influential variables) and weighting (the number items or events). Both methods were applied to the FDA’s Sentinel network, that already positively paired the outcome to the vaccine. The estimates from both methods were similar and comparable to prior studies of different designs and are viable alternatives for safety monitoring.

DeStefano F, Shimabukuro TT. The MMR Vaccine and Autism.   Annu Rev Virol. 2019 Sep; 6. Epub 2019 Apr 15.

The most damaging vaccine safety controversy of recent years began as an exploration of the possible role of measles and measles vaccines in causing of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). That work eventually evolved into a report published in 1998, but subsequently retracted by the journal, that suggested Measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine causes autism. Although numerous scientific studies have since refuted a connection between MMR vaccine and autism, some parents are still hesitant to accept MMR vaccination of their children because they are uncertain about the safety of the vaccine. In this review, the authors summarize the genesis of the controversy and review the scientific evidence against a causal association. Also discussed is the effect of the controversy on MMR vaccine acceptance and the resurgence of measles outbreaks, as well as what can be done to bolster vaccine confidence, including the central role of scientists and healthcare providers.

Zheng C, Yu W, Xie F, Chen W, Mercado C, Sy LS, Qian L, Glenn S, Lee G, Tseng HF, Duffy J, Jackson LA, Daley MF, Crane B, McLean HQ, Jacobsen SJ. The use of natural language processing to identify Tdap-related local reactions at five health care systems in the Vaccine Safety Datalink , International Journal of Medical Informatics , 2019 Jul; 127(1386-5056): 27-34. Epub 2019 Apr 13.

The Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) plays a critical role in monitoring adverse events after vaccinations by using the electronic health records. Most studies performed in the VSD rely on diagnosis codes and manual chart review for outcome identification and confirmation. A natural language processing (NLP) system was developed, then deployed and executed at multiple institutions. The system achieved reasonable accuracy in identifying a specific vaccine-related adverse event. This study demonstrates the feasibility of using NLP to reduce the potential burden of conducting manual chart review in future vaccine safety studies. “False negatives” of diagnosis codes are not commonly investigated in vaccine safety studies. NLP can identify cases missed by diagnosis codes. NLP has many potential applications in future vaccine safety studies based on the considerations of the pros and cons of NLP and the specific requirements of the study.

Myers TR, McCarthy NL, Panagiotakopoulos L, Omer SB. Estimation of the Incidence of Guillain-Barré Syndrome During Pregnancy in the United States . Open Forum Infectious Diseases . 2019 Mar; 6(3): ofz071.

Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an adverse event of interest after vaccination, yet little is known about how frequently this rare neurologic disorder occurs during pregnancy. GBS may be an outcome of particular interest during Zika vaccine trials, because it has been associated with Zika virus infection. In this Vaccine Safety Datalink study, researchers identified potential GBS cases from January 1, 2004 through July 31, 2015 during pregnancy and the 42 days following birth. Of the 1.2 million pregnancies that met inclusion criteria, 35 potential cases of GBS were identified and 2 cases were confirmed as incident GBS during pregnancy. The resulting estimated incidence rate for GBS during pregnancy was 2.8 GBS cases per million person-years. These findings will help inform future safety assessments of Zika and other vaccines in pregnant populations.

Klein NP, Goddard K, Lewis E, Ross P, Gee J, DeStefano F, Baxter R. Long term  risk of developing type 1 diabetes after HPV vaccination in males and females.   Vaccine . 2019 Mar 28; 37(14):1938-1944. Epub 2019 Mar 1.

Despite scientific evidence, public concerns that the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine can cause autoimmune diseases persist. The Vaccine Safety Datalink evaluated whether HPV vaccine is associated with a long-term increased risk of type 1 diabetes at one participating site. This retrospective cohort study identified all potential type 1 diabetes cases from Kaiser Permanente Northern California members who were between 11 and 26 years old any time after June 2006 through December 2015 – over 900,000 individuals. Of the 2,613 cases of type 1 diabetes identified, 338 (123 vaccinated with HPV and 265 unvaccinated) remained in the analysis. Over the 10 years of the study period, comparing vaccinated with unvaccinated persons, researchers did not find an increased risk of type 1 diabetes associated with HPV vaccine receipt.

Haber P, Moro PL, Ng C, Dores GM, Lewis P, Cano M. Post-licensure surveillance of trivalent adjuvanted influenza vaccine (aIIV3; Fluad), Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), United States, July 2016-June 2018. Vaccine . 2019 Mar 7;37(11):1516-1520. Epub 2019 Feb 7.

Trivalent adjuvanted influenza vaccine (aIIV3; Fluad®) was approved in the U.S. in 2015 for adults aged 65 years and older, and has been in use since the 2016-2017 influenza season. Using the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, researchers analyzed U.S. reports for aIIV3 submitted from July 2016 to June 2018, totaling 630 reports. Of note, there were 79 reports of people under the age of 65 who received the vaccine. The most commonly reported adverse events were consistent with pre-licensure studies, and included injection site pain and redness. Researchers did not identify any new safety concerns associated with aIIV3 among individuals indicated for the vaccine (65 years of age or older). Importantly, vaccine providers should be aware of and follow the prescribing information for the vaccine and administer it only to patients in the recommended age range.

Hesse EM, Shimabukuro TT, Su JR, et al. Postlicensure Safety Surveillance of Recombinant Zoster Vaccine (Shingrix) — United States, October 2017–June 2018 . MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019 Feb 1; 68(4):91–94.

This is the first report covering post-licensure safety monitoring of the recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV; Shingrix, GSK) in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) during the initial 8 months of use in the United States. From October 2017 to June 2018, VAERS received 4,381 adverse event reports related to Shingrix; 4,251 (97%) were classified as non-serious. During that timeframe, about 3.2 million doses of Shingrix were distributed in the United States. The most common symptoms reported were fever, and injection site pain and redness. These findings are consistent with pre-licensure clinical trial data, and no unexpected patterns were detected. Clinicians should counsel patients to expect common reactions such as pain, swelling, and redness at the injection site, along with possible body aches, fever, and chills. These reactions usually resolve on their own in 2 to 3 days.

Landazabal CS, Moro PL, Lewis P, Omer SB. Safety of 9-valent human papillomavirus vaccine administration among pregnant women: Adverse event reports in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2014-2017 . Vaccine . 2019 Feb 21; 37(9):1229-1234. Epub 2019 Jan 16.

9-valent human papillomavirus vaccine (9vHPV) was approved by FDA in December 2014. 9vHPV is not recommended during pregnancy but some women of childbearing age may be inadvertently exposed. This study assessed reports to Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) of pregnant women vaccinated with 9vHPV in the United States between December 2014-December 2017. Disproportionate reporting of adverse events (AEs) was assessed using proportional reporting ratios. A total of 82 pregnancy reports were identified. Sixty reports (73.2%) did not describe an AE. The most frequently reported AEs were miscarriage and injection site reactions (both n=3; 3.7%). Of note, miscarriage may occur in up to one-third of pregnancies; the observed reports in this study were not unusual or unexpected. No disproportional reporting for any AE was found. Overall, no unexpected AEs were observed among these pregnancy reports.

Su JR, Moro PL, Ng CS, Lewis PW, Said MA, Cano MV. Anaphylaxis after vaccination reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, 1990-2016.   J  Allergy Clin Immunol . 2019 Apr; 143(4):1465-1473. Epub 2019 Jan 14.

Anaphylaxis is a rare, potentially life-threatening hypersensitivity reaction that can occur after vaccination. During 1990–2016, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) received a total of 467,960 reports. Researchers identified 828 reports describing persons who were physician-diagnosed with or met the Brighton Collaboration case definition for anaphylaxis. Of reports in people aged 18 years or younger, 65% were male; childhood vaccines were most commonly reported. Of reports in people aged 19 years and older, 80% were female, and influenza vaccines were most commonly reported. Over 40% of the 828 reports described persons with no history of hypersensitivity. Of 8 reported deaths, 4 had no history of hypersensitivity. Anaphylaxis after vaccination is rare, but can occur, including among persons with no history of hypersensitivity. Providers who administer vaccines should be prepared to manage severe hypersensitivity reactions.

Tartof SY, Qian L, Liu IA, Tseng HF, Sy LS, Hechter RC, Lewin BJ, Jacobsen SJ. Safety of Influenza Vaccination Administered During Hospitalization . Mayo Clin Proc . 2019 Mar; 94(3):397-407. Epub 2019 Jan 8.

CDC recommends that hospitalized patients who are eligible to receive influenza vaccine be vaccinated before discharge; however, previous data suggest that rates of influenza immunization among hospitalized patients before discharge remain low. In a retrospective cohort study conducted at Kaiser Permanente Southern California, investigators analyzed whether influenza vaccination during hospitalization was associated with an increased risk of outpatient and emergency department visits, readmissions, fever, and clinical laboratory evaluations for infection in the 7 days following discharge. Investigators found no increased risk for these outcomes among those vaccination during hospitalization compared with those who were never vaccinated or were vaccinated at other times. These findings provide reassurance about the safety of influenza vaccination during hospitalization.

McClure DL, Jacobsen SJ, Klein NP, Naleway AL, Kharbanda EO, Glanz JM, Jackson LA, Weintraub ES, McLean HQ. Similar relative risks of seizures following measles containing vaccination in children born preterm compared to full-term without previous seizures or seizure-related disorders . Vaccine . 2019 Jan 3; 37(1):76-79. Epub 2018 Nov 23.

In the United States, measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) and measles-mumps-rubella-varicella (MMRV) vaccines are recommended to children at age 12 months and older. These vaccines are associated with a small increased risk of febrile seizures during the second week after vaccination. This Vaccine Safety Datalink study assessed the relative risk of febrile seizures after MMR/MMRV vaccination in children born preterm and children born full-term. Prior to this study, limited data were available on the safety of vaccinations given during the second year of life in preterm children. Researchers looked at 532,375 children (45,343 preterm and 487,032 full-term) who received their first dose of measles-containing vaccine at age 12 through 23 months. The data showed similar relative risk of seizure in both groups. The results support current Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommendations to administer the first dose of these vaccines at age 12 through 15 months for all children, including those born preterm.

McNeil MM, Duderstadt SK, Sabatier JF, Ma GG, Duffy J. Vaccination and Risk of Lone Atrial Fibrillation in the Active Component United States Military. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018 Nov 16;15(3): 669-676. Epub 2019 Jan 8.

In this retrospective population-based cohort study of nearly 3 million U.S. military personnel, researchers looked at whether receiving the anthrax vaccine absorbed (AVA) increased the risk of atrial fibrillation in those who did not have identifiable underlying risk factors or structural heart disease (lone atrial fibrillation). The authors used the Defense Medical Surveillance System to review military personnel on active duty from January 1, 1998 through December 31, 2006. Following over 11,000 person-years of service, the study found no elevated risk of diagnosed lone atrial fibrillation associated with AVA (adjusted risk ratio of 0.99), influenza, or smallpox vaccinations given during military service. These findings may be helpful in planning future vaccine safety research.

Moro PL, Lewis P, Cano M Adverse events following purified chick embryo cell rabies vaccine in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) in the United States, 2006-2017 – Correspondence Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease 2019 May-Jun; 29(1477-8939): 80-81. Epub 2018 Oct 26.

Rabies is a viral disease of mammals most often transmitted through the bite of a rabid animal and is life threatening. For those exposed to the virus, the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks. There are two cell cultures rabies vaccines available in the United States: human diploid cell vaccine (HDCV – licensed in 1980) and purified chick embryo cell vaccine (PCECV – licensed in 1997). A safety study on PCECV has not been done since 2005. Researchers re-assessed the safety of the vaccine in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) from January 2006 through June 2017. Excluding non-U.S. reports and duplicate records, VAERS received 604 reports involving PCECV during the 10 year time frame. Of those, 42 were coded as serious reports. No deaths were reported. Data mining analysis did not reveal disproportional reporting for any adverse event. Adverse events reported were consistent with previous post-licensure study and no new or unexpected adverse events were observed.

Weibel D, Sturkenboom M, Black S, de Ridder M, Dodd C, Bonhoeffer J, Vanrolleghem A, van der Maas N, Lammers GJ, Overeem S, Cauch-Dudek K, Juhasz D, Campitelli M, Datta AN, Kallwei U, Huan WT, Hsu CY, Chen HC, Giner-Soriano M, Morros R, Gaig C, Tió E, Perez-Vilar S, Diez-Domingo J, Puertas FJ, Svenson LW, Mahmud SM, Carleton B, Naus M, Arnheim-Dahlström L, Pedersen L, DeStefano F, Shimabukuro TT. Narcolepsy and Adjuvanted Pandemic Influenza A (H1N1) 2009 Vaccines – Multi-county Assessment. Vaccine. 2018 Oct 1;26(41):6202-6211.

In 2010, a safety signal was detected for narcolepsy in several European countries following vaccination with Pandemrix, a monovalent pandemic H1N1 (pH1N1) vaccine containing AS03 adjuvant. The reports followed large-scale pH1N1 vaccination campaigns during 2009-10. To investigate further, a study team including CDC scientists analyzed vaccine safety data on adjuvanted pH1N1 vaccines (Arenaprix-AS03, Focetria-MF59, and Pandemrix-AS03) from 10 global study sites. Researchers did not detect any new associations between the vaccines and narcolepsy.

Suragh TA, Lamprianou A, MacDonald NE, Loharikar AR, Balakrishnan MR, Benes O, Hyde TB, McNeil MM. Cluster Anxiety-Related Adverse Events Following Immunization (AEFI): An Assessment of Reports Detected in Social Media and Those Identified Using an Online Search Engine. Vaccine. 2018 Sep25;26(40):5949-5954.

Adverse events following immunization (AEFI) that arise from anxiety can occur in clusters and may result in unnecessary medical treatments and disrupted vaccination programs. News of these incidents can spread rapidly via the internet and social media. In this study, researchers used Google and Facebook to identify reports of cluster anxiety-related AEFIs not found in traditional peer-reviewed literature and found 39 reports referring to 18 unique cluster events. The most common vaccine mentioned was human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine (48.7%). The majority of reports (97.4%) involved children; all occurred in a school setting or as part of vaccination campaigns. Five vaccination programs were reportedly halted despite investigations finding no link between the adverse events and the vaccines. These results demonstrate the potential for using information from the web to supplement traditional sources for identifying cluster anxiety-related AEFIs.

Suragh TA, Lewis P, Arana J, Mba-Jonas A, Li R, Stewart B, Shimabukuro TT, Cano M. Safety of bivalent human papillomavirus vaccine in the US vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS), 2009-2017. Br J Clin Pharmacol . 2018 Dec; 84(12):2928-2932. Epub 2018 Sep 21.

In 2009, bivalent human papillomavirus vaccine (2vHPV, Cervarix) was licensed for use in the United States. Due to low use in the marketplace, the manufacturer stopped supplying 2vHPV in the United States in 2016 and withdrew it from the U.S. market completely in late 2017. The vaccine is currently licensed and used in at least 134 other countries worldwide. In this review, reports submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting Systems (VAERS) following 2vHPV vaccination during 2009-2017 were analyzed. During this period, over 720,000 2vHPV doses were distributed in the U.S.; VAERS received 241 adverse event reports. Researchers did not identify any new or unexpected safety concerns in their review.

Fortner KB, Swamy GK, Broder KR, Jimenez-Truque N, Zhu Y, Moro PL, Liang J, Walter EB, Heine RP, Moody MA, Yoder S, Edwards KM. Reactogenicity and immunogenicity of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) in pregnant and nonpregnant women . Vaccine. 2018 Oct 8; 36(42):6354-6360. Epub 2018 Sep 13.

CDC recommends that pregnant women receive Tdap vaccine to protect young infants from pertussis (whooping cough). The CISA Project study enrolled 374 pregnant and 225 nonpregnant women to evaluate safety and immune responses after Tdap; 53% of the pregnant women had received Tdap in the past. Pregnancy and infant health outcomes were also assessed and will be described in a future report. Injection-site and systemic reactions (e.g., fever) were assessed for 7 days after Tdap. Blood was collected from the women before and after Tdap to evaluate immune responses. Researchers found that Tdap was well-tolerated in pregnant and nonpregnant women. Pregnant women were more likely to report moderate or severe injection-site pain (18%) compared with nonpregnant women (11%) but this did not lead to medical visits. Prior Tdap receipt did not increase occurrence of moderate or severe reactions in pregnant women. Immune responses to all Tdap vaccine antigens were robust in both groups.

Groom HC, Irving SA, Koppolu P, Smith N, Vazquez-Benitez G, Kharbanda EO, Daley MF, Donahue JG, Getahun D, Jackson LA, Tse Kawai A, Klein NP, McCarthy NL,  Nordin JD, Sukumaran L, Naleway AL. Uptake and safety of Hepatitis B vaccination during pregnancy: A Vaccine Safety Datalink study . Vaccine . 2018 Oct 1; 36(41):6111-6116. Epub 2018 Sep 5.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection acquired during pregnancy can pose a risk to the infant at birth that can lead to significant and lifelong morbidity. Hepatitis B vaccine (HepB) is recommended for anyone at increased risk for contracting HBV infection, including pregnant women. Prior to this study, limited data were available on the safety of HepB administration during pregnancy. In this Vaccine Safety Datalink retrospective cohort study, researchers assessed potential association between maternal HepB vaccinations and pre-specified maternal and infant safety outcomes, looking at pregnancies resulting in live births from 2004-2015. Women were continuously enrolled from 6 months pre-pregnancy to 6 weeks postpartum. Most women who received maternal HepB did not have high-risk indications for vaccination. The study found there was no increased risk for the examined adverse events in women who received maternal HepB or in their offspring.

Grohskopf LA, Sokolow LZ, Broder KR, Walter EB, Fry AM, Jernigan DB. Prevention and Control of Seasonal Influenza with Vaccines: Recommendation of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices – United States, 2018-2019 Influenza Season. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2018 Aug 24;67(No. RR-3):1-20.

Routine annual influenza vaccination is recommended for all persons 6 months of age and older who do not have contraindications. A licensed, recommended, and age-appropriate vaccine should be used. Inactivated influenza vaccines (IIVs), recombinant influenza vaccine (RIV), and live attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) are expected to be available for the 2018–19 season. For adults 65 years and older, any age-appropriate IIV formulation or RIV4 are acceptable options. Given unknown but theoretical concerns of increased reactogenicity when administering two new adjuvant-containing vaccines, selection of a nonadjuvanted influenza vaccine may be considered in situations where influenza vaccine and another vaccine containing a new adjuvant are to be administered concomitantly; vaccination should not be delayed if a specific product is not available. Vaccines with newer adjuvants, like other vaccines, should be administered at separate sites from other vaccines that are given concomitantly.

Naleway AL, Mittendorf KF, Irving SA, Henninger ML, Crane B, Smith N, Daley MF, Gee J. Primary Ovarian Insufficiency and Adolescent Vaccination . Pediatrics. 2018 Sep; 14(3). Epub 2018 Aug 21.

Published case series have suggested a potential association between human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination and primary ovarian insufficiency (POI). But, no population-based epidemiological studies have been reported. To the authors’ knowledge, this new Vaccine Safety Datalink study – a population-based, retrospective cohort study of nearly 200,000 women – is a first, and overcomes some of the limitations of earlier post-licensure monitoring that relied on passive reporting. Researchers found there was no elevated risk of POI following HPV, Tdap, IIV, and MenACWY vaccination in women of reproductive age. These findings should lessen concern about potential impact on fertility from adolescent vaccination.

Haber P, Amin M, Ng C, Weintraub E, McNeil MM. Reports of lower respiratory tract infection following dose 1 of RotaTeq and Rotarix vaccines to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2008-2016 . Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018 Jul 11:1-5. Epub 2018 Jul 26.

A recent GlaxoSmithKline post-marketing study found a possible association between the administration of the first dose of the rotavirus vaccine Rotarix and lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) in infants 0-6 days after vaccination. Using Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System data, this study examined reports of LRTIs in infants 6-15 weeks old who received one of two rotavirus vaccines, Rotarix or RotaTeq, in addition to either the 7-valent (PCV7) or 13-valent (PCV13) pneumococcal conjugate vaccine. Reports of LRTIs occurring in the 0-29 day window following the first dose of the rotavirus vaccination were analyzed between January 2008 and December 2016. Researchers found LRTI rates were not different in those infants from rates of LRTIs in infants receiving other recommended childhood vaccines.

Kharbanda EO, Vazquez-Benitez G, Lipkind HS, Sheth SS, Zhu J, Naleway AL, Klein NP, Hechter R, Daley MF, Donahue JG, Jackson ML, Kawai AT, Sukumaran L, Nordin JD. Risk of Spontaneous Abortion After Inadvertent Human Papillomavirus Vaccination in Pregnancy . Obstet. Gynecol. 2018 Jul; 132(1): 35-44.

Quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine (4vHPV) is not recommended during pregnancy but may be given inadvertently when pregnancy status is not known. While data on HPV vaccine exposures during or around the time of pregnancy have not raised concerns, additional safety studies are needed. Using the Vaccine Safety Datalink, researchers conducted a retrospective observational cohort study that evaluated the risk of spontaneous abortion following 4vHPV before and during pregnancy. Between January 2008 and November 2014, 2,800 pregnancies were identified with 4vHPV exposure. The authors found the risk of spontaneous abortion did not increase among women who received 4vHPV before or during pregnancy. These findings are consistent with pre-licensures clinical trials and post-licensure safety studies.

Su JR, Ng C, Lewis PW, Cano MV. Adverse events after vaccination among HIV-positive persons, 1990-2016. PLoS One . 2018 Jun 19; 13(6) e0199229.

Vaccines are especially critical for people with chronic health conditions such as HIV infection, and are recommended by Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices and CDC based on a person’s immune status. Through this study, researchers looked at U.S. reports to Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System during 1990-2016 to investigate if people living with HIV experienced unexpected adverse events (AEs) or unusual patterns of AEs after vaccination. The analysis found no unexpected or unusual patterns of AEs. These results support the safety of recommended vaccines in people with HIV. Of note, 2 people with HIV with severely compromised immune systems died from widespread infection after receiving live virus vaccines. Healthcare providers should be aware of a patient’s immune status prior to administration of live virus vaccines. Following ACIP best practices can help prevent rare, but life-threatening, AEs.

Walker WL, Hills SL, Miller ER, Fischer M, Rabe IB. Adverse events following vaccination with an inactivated, Vero cell culture-derived Japanese encephalitis vaccine in the United States, 2012-2016 .  Vaccine . 2018 Jul 5; 36(29):4369-4374. Epub 2018 Jun 8.

Inactivated Vero cell culture-derived vaccine (JE-VC; IXIARO) was licensed by Food and Drug Administration in 2009 and has a generally favorable safety profile. In this review of adverse events (AEs) following JE-VC reported to Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System during May 1, 2012 through April 30, 2016, researchers found reporting rates of AEs were similar to those of the previous analysis (2009-2012). Although reporting rates of AEs in children could not be calculated, there were low numbers of reported events in this age group. Safety surveillance for this relatively new vaccine continues to be important to monitor AE reporting rates and identify possible rare serious events.

Moro PL, Perez-Vilar S, Lewis P, Bryant-Genevier M, Kamiya H, Cano M. Safety Surveillance of Diphtheria and Tetanus Toxoids and Acellular Pertussis (DTaP) Vaccines . Pediatrics . 2018 Jul; 142(1). Epub 2018 Jun 4.

Diphtheria, tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccines were first licensed by the Food and Drug Administration in 1991. To assess the post-licensure safety of DTaP vaccines, researchers reviewed reports of adverse events following vaccination submitted to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). From January 1991 to December 2016, 50,157 reports were submitted to VAERS following DTaP vaccination. The most frequently reported adverse events were injection site redness (25.3%), fever (19.8%), and injection site swelling (15.0%). This assessment did not identify any new or unexpected safety issues and supports the favorable safety profile from pre-clinical trials. Reports of non-serious vaccination errors, such as incorrect vaccine administered or wrong site, call for better education of providers on the specific indications for each of the DTaP vaccines.

Jackson ML, Yu O, Nelson JC, Nordin JD, Tartof SY, Klein NP, Donahue JG, Irving SA, Glanz JM, McNeil MM, Jackson LA. Safety of repeated doses of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccine in adults and adolescents . Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 2018 Aug; 27(8): 921-925. Epub 2018 Jun 3.

Because protective pertussis immunity may wane within 5 years of Tdap (tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis) vaccine receipt, maintaining protection may require repeated vaccination. A possible strategy would be to recommend Tdap in place of decennial Td (tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria) doses. This VSD study evaluated the safety of repeated doses of tetanus-containing vaccine at intervals <10 years between doses among a population of 68,915 non-pregnant adults and adolescents. Compared to 7,521 subjects who received a subsequent dose of Td vaccine, 61,394 subjects who received a subsequent dose of Tdap did not have significantly elevated risk of medical visits for seizure, cranial nerve disorders, limb swelling, pain in limb, cellulitis, paralytic syndromes, or encephalopathy/encephalitis/meningitis. These results suggest that repeated Tdap vaccination has acceptable safety relative to Tdap vaccination followed by subsequent Td vaccination.

Tseng HF, Sy LS, Qian L, Liu IA, Mercado C, Lewin B, Tartof SY, Nelson J, Jackson LA, Daley MF, Weintraub E, Klein NP, Belongia E, Liles EG, Jacobsen SJ. Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine Safety in Elderly Adults . Open. Forum Infect. Dis. 2018 May 2; 5(6): ofy100. Epub 2018 Jun.

The 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV13) and the 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (PPSV23) are both licensed vaccines recommended for use in adults 65 years of age and older to protect against pneumococcal disease. PPSV23 protects against 23 types of the approximately 90 types of pneumococcal bacteria and was first licensed in 1983; the newer PCV13 vaccine protects against 13 types of pneumococcal bacteria and was licensed in 2010. In this large cohort study using data from 6 Vaccine Safety Datalink sites, researchers compared the risk in adults 65 years of age and older for serious adverse events (AEs) following vaccination with either PCV13 or PPSV23. The analysis did not find an increased risk of adverse events following PCV13 administration compared to PPSV23, and should provide reassurance regarding use of PCV13.

Shimabukuro TT, Miller ER, Strikas RA, Hibbs BF, Dooling K, Goud R, Cano MV Notes from the Field: Vaccine Administration Errors Involving Recombinant Zoster Vaccine — United States, 2017–2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 May 25; 67: 585–586.

During the first four months of RZV (Shingrix®) monitoring (October 20, 2017-February 20, 2018), Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System received a total of 155 reports, of which 13 (8%) documented an administration error, some with more than one type of error. Vaccine providers may be confusing administration procedures and storage requirements between the older ZVL (Zostavax®) vaccine and the newly licensed RZV. Prior experience indicates that reports of administration errors are highest shortly after licensure and recommendation, likely due to lack of familiarity with a new vaccine. To prevent RZV administration errors, vaccine providers should be aware of prescribing information, storage requirements, preparation guidelines, and Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices recommendations for herpes zoster vaccines.

Miller ER, Lewis P, Shimabukuro TT, Su J, Moro P, Woo EJ, Jankosky C, Cano M. Post-licensure safety surveillance of zoster vaccine live (Zostavax®) in the United States, Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2006-2015 . Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2018 Mar 26; 14(8): 1963-1969 Epub 2018 May 18.

Herpes zoster (HZ), or shingles, is caused by reactivation of varicella-zoster virus—the same virus that causes chickenpox. Live-attenuated HZ vaccine (zoster vaccine live, ZVL, Zostavax) was licensed by the Food and Drug Administration in 2006 to prevent shingles and is recommended by CDC for people 60 years and older. Researchers reviewed reports of adverse events following ZVL to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) from May 1, 2006 through January 31, 2015. During this time, close to 22 million ZVL doses were distributed. VAERS received 23,092 reports; 96% were classified as non-serious. The most common adverse events reported included injection site pain (27%), HZ (17%), injection site swelling (17%) and rash (14%). This review did not detect new or unexpected safety signals.

Carter RJ, Idriss A, Widdowson MA, Samai M, Schrag SJ, Legardy-Williams JK, Estivariz CF, Callis A, Carr W, Webber W, Fischer ME, Hadler S, Sahr, Thompson M, Gerby SM, Edem-Hotah J, M’baindu Momoh R, McDonald W, Gee JM, Flagbata Kallon A, Spencer-Walters D, Bresee JS, Cohn A, Hersey S, Gibson L, Schuchat A, Seward JF. Implementing a Multisite Clinical Trial in the Midst of an Ebola Outbreak: Lessons Learned from the Sierra Leone Trial to Introduce a Vaccine Against Ebola. J Infect Dis. 2018 Jen 15;217(suppl_1):S16-S23. Epub 2018 May 18.

Ebola is a highly contagious disease with a high mortality rate, with no licensed vaccine available as of 2018. Vaccine development includes rigorous testing and 3 phases of clinical trials. The Sierra Leone Trial to Introduce a Vaccine Against Ebola (STRIVE) was the second clinical trial phase to study the investigational Ebola virus vaccine rVSV∆-ZEBOV-GP. It was conducted during an unprecedented Ebola epidemic. Even before the outbreak, Sierra Leone had limited infrastructure and staff to conduct the trials. The STRIVE team addressed these challenges by allocating time to renovate the sites; providing ongoing support to maintain the water, electricity, and internet services; and training nearly 350 local staff members without hindering the Ebola response efforts. By strengthening the infrastructure and increasing the number of properly trained staff, Sierra Leone is now better equipped to conduct future clinical trials and in a better position to manage Ebola cases and clusters.

Xu S, Clarke CL, Newcomer SR, Daley MF, Glanz JM. Analyzing self-controlled case series data when case confirmation rates are estimated from an internal validation sample . Biom. J. 2018 Jul; 60(4): 748-760. Epub 2018 May 16.

Vaccine safety studies are often observational studies using electronic health records (EHR), however, these studies face some challenges, including outside influences (confounding) and outcome misclassification. To handle the confounding effect, researchers use self-controlled case series (SCCS) study design and review of EHRs to validate cases. SCCS design is limited to those individuals who experienced the event during or outside of certain times. While SCCS can adjust for some factors, it cannot adjust for others. This review considered 4 approaches for analyzing SCCS data: observed cases, confirmed cases only, known confirmation rate, and multiple imputation. Researchers found through simulation that when misclassification of adverse events is present, multiple imputation analysis should be considered. When only a sample of presumptive cases can be validated, this approach can address the influence of false-positive cases in EHR data.

Zerbo O, Modaressi S, Goddard K, Lewis E, Fireman BH, Daley MF, Irving SA, Jackson LA, Donahue JG, Qian L, Getahun D, DeStefano F, McNeil MM, Klein NP. Vaccination Patterns in Children After Autism Spectrum Disorder Diagnosis and in Their Younger Siblings . JAMA Pediatr. 2018 May 1; 172(5): 469-475.

Recently, several outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases generated concerns about the impact of increasing rates of undervaccination. This study investigates whether rates of vaccination in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and their younger siblings differ from rates of vaccination in the general pediatric population. Results show that both children with ASD and their younger siblings are significantly less likely to be fully vaccinated than children in families without a child with ASD. Although the reasons for undervaccination are not fully explored in this study, results suggest that parental refusal of vaccination may play an important role.

Liang JL, Tiwari T, Moro P, Messonnier NE, Reingold A, Sawyer M, Clark TA. Prevention of Pertussis, Tetanus, and Diphtheria with Vaccines in the United States: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep. 2018 Apr 27 ;67(No. RR-2):1–44.

This report compiles and summarizes recommendations from CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices on the prevention and control of tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis in the U.S. This report is a comprehensive summary of previously published recommendations replacing previously published reports and policy notes and does not contain any new recommendations. Infants and young children are recommended to receive a 5-dose series of diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccines, with a booster dose of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine. Adults who never received Tdap are recommended to receive a booster dose. Women are recommended to receive a dose of Tdap during each pregnancy, regardless of previous receipt. Adolescents and adults are recommended to receive a booster tetanus and diphtheria toxoids (Td) vaccine every 10 years to assure ongoing protection against tetanus and diphtheria.

Donahue, J. Response to three Letters to the Editor regarding: Donahue JG, et al. Association of spontaneous abortion with receipt of inactivated influenza vaccine containing H1N1pdm09 in 2010-11 and 2011-12 . Vaccine . 2018 Apr 19; 36(17): 2231-2232.

Summaries are not made for a response to a letter to the editor.

Daley MF, Shoup JA, Newcomer SR, Jackson ML, Groom HC, Jacobsen SJ, McLean HQ, Klein NP, Weintraub ES, McNeil MM, Glanz JM. Assessing Potential Confounding and Misclassification Bias When Studying the Safety of the Childhood Immunization Schedule . Acad. Pediatr. 2018 Sept – Oct; 18(7): 754-762. Epub 2018 Mar 28.

Some parents are concerned the childhood immunization schedule could increase risk for allergic disorders, including asthma. This, along with the overall safety of the schedule, has parents delaying their children’s vaccinations. Researchers wanted to examine if there was a risk of vaccination status misclassification (between parent and health record) and if risk factors of asthma and other allergies varied by status. This survey was conducted among parents of children 19-35 months old at 8 Vaccine Safety Datalink sites. Among a sample of 2,043 parents, 1,209 (59.2%) responded. The observed agreement between parents and health record for no vaccines was 94% and 87.3 % for receiving all vaccines, no delay. Results showed that misclassification of vaccination status was uncommon, and parents’ reports of asthma risk factors generally did not vary by vaccination status. The data from this study will assist future observational studies with measurement and controlling disease risk.

Glanz JM, Newcomer SR, Daley MF, DeStefano F, Groom HC, Jackson ML, Lewin BJ, McCarthy NL, McClure DL, Narwaney KJ, Nordin JD, Zerbo O. Association Between Estimated Cumulative Vaccine Antigen Exposure Through the First 23 Months of Life and Non-Vaccine-Targeted Infections From 24 Through 47 Months of Age . JAMA . 2018 Mar 6; 319(9): 906-913.

Up to 15% of parents delay their children’s immunizations because of concerns that early childhood vaccines may overwhelm the immune system and cause children to be more susceptible to other infections. While a Danish study did not find evidence that multiple vaccine antigen exposure was associated with the risk for non-vaccine-targeted infectious diseases, this type of study has not been completed in the United States. In this case control study, data was collected from 6 Vaccine Safety Datalink sites to compare children with non-vaccine targeted infections to children without such infections. There were 944 children ages 24 through 47 months enrolled (193 cases, and 751 controls) and the results were not different between the two groups in their estimated cumulative vaccine antigen exposure during the first 23 months of life. In summary, exposure to multiple vaccines did not increase a child’s risk of non-vaccine targeted infections.

Irving SA, Groom HC, Stokley S, McNeil MM, Gee J, Smith N, Naleway AL. Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Coverage and Prevalence of Missed Opportunities for Vaccination in an Integrated Healthcare System . Acad. Pediatr. 2018 Mar; 18(2S): S85-S92.

Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination has been recommended in the United States for female and male adolescents since 2006 and 2011, respectively. However, vaccination rates for HPV compared to other childhood vaccines are lower. Researchers designed an assessment and provider-feedback intervention to increase HPV vaccine rate and identify missed opportunities for vaccination. The assessment and intervention occurred at 9 Oregon-based Kaiser Permanente Northwest outpatient clinics between April 2015 and June 2016. An average 29,021 adolescents ages 11-17 were included. Researchers collected baseline data four years prior to the intervention and found that vaccination rates were increasing; after intervention, there were no significant increases. Researchers did identify that missed opportunities decreased during the intervention for females 13-17 years old. Increasing HPV rates in large health systems is challenging, but other interventions are worth examining.

Kuntz J, Crane B, Weinmann S, Naleway AL. Myocarditis and pericarditis are rare following live viral vaccinations in adults . Vaccine. 2018 Mar 14; 36(12): 1524-1527. Epub 2018 Feb 15.

Cardiac complications including myocarditis, pericarditis, and arrhythmias following smallpox vaccination have been rarely reported in the United States. However, after 67 cases of myocarditis or pericarditis were reported after a vaccination campaign of military personnel, there was a need to assess these outcomes among adults after live-viral vaccinations. In this study using data from 4 Vaccine Safety Datalink sites from 1996-2007, researchers identified over 400,000 adults who received at least 1 live viral vaccine. Of those, there was only 1 probable case of pericarditis and no cases of myocarditis in 42 days following vaccination. Self-controlled risk interval analysis found there is no increased risk of myopericarditis in the 42 days following vaccination. The study findings suggest that the occurrence of myopericarditis following live viral vaccination is rare, not higher than the background rate, and much lower than rates following smallpox vaccination.

Markowitz LE, Gee J, Chesson H, Stokley S. Ten Years of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination in the United States. Acad Pediatr . 2018 Mar; 18(2S):S3-S10.

Since human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine was first introduced for females in the United States in 2006, vaccination policy has evolved as additional HPV vaccines were licensed and new data became available. The United States was the first country to adopt a gender-neutral routine HPV immunization policy in 2011. Researchers summarized reviews of the first 10 years of the HPV vaccination program, including the evolution in vaccine policy, the vaccination program and coverage, and post-licensure vaccine safety studies. Reviews show coverage is increasing, although it remains lower than for other vaccines recommended for adolescents. There are various reasons for low coverage, and efforts are ongoing to increase vaccine uptake. The safety profile of HPV vaccine has been well established from 10 years of post-licensure monitoring. Despite low coverage, the early effects of the HPV vaccination program have exceeded expectations.

Arana JE, Harrington T, Cano M, Lewis P, Mba-Jonas A, Rongxia L, Stewart B, Markowitz LE, Shimabukuro TT. Post-licensure safety monitoring of quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2009-2015 . Vaccine . 2018 Mar 20; 36(13):1781-1788. Epub 2018 Feb 21.

This study reviewed adverse events reported to Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting Systems following Gardasil® (4vHPV) vaccination between January 2009 and December 2015. A previous review did not include males because they were not recommended for vaccination at the time; this study includes both males and females. The analysis found 94.2% of the 19,760 reported adverse events were non-serious, and included headache, nausea, and fatigue. More than 60 million 4vHPV doses were distributed in the United States at the time, making the crude adverse event reporting rate 327 reports per million 4vHPV doses distributed. No unexpected or new safety concerns or reporting patterns were found.

Sukumaran L, McCarthy NL, Kharbanda EO, Vazquez-Benitez G, Lipkind HS, Jackson L, Klein NP, Naleway AL, McClure DL, Hechter RC, Kawai AT, Glanz JM, Weintraub ES. Infant Hospitalizations and Mortality After Maternal Vaccination . Pediatrics. 2018 Mar; 14(3). Epub 2018 Feb 20.

Influenza and Tdap vaccines are recommended for pregnant women. However, there are limited data on long-term outcomes of infants born to mothers vaccinated during pregnancy. This case-control study found that influenza and Tdap vaccines in pregnancy are not associated with an increased risk of hospitalization or death in infants during the first six months of life. These findings contribute to the knowledge of the long-term safety of vaccination during pregnancy.

Li R, Weintraub E, McNeil MM, Kulldorff M, Lewis EM, Nelson J, Xu S, Qian L, Klein NP, DeStefano F. Meningococcal conjugate vaccine safety surveillance in the Vaccine Safety Datalink using a tree-temporal scan data mining method . Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 2018 Apr; 27(4): 391-397. Epub 2018 Feb 15.

Traditional pharmacovigilance techniques used in vaccine safety are generally geared to detecting adverse events (AEs) based on pre‐defined sets of conditions or diagnoses. Using a newly developed tree‐temporal scan statistic data mining method, researchers performed a pilot study to evaluate the safety profile of the meningococcal conjugate vaccine Menactra®. The authors detected known AEs following the vaccine; no new safety concerns were raised. The study demonstrates that the tree‐temporal scan statistic data mining method can be successfully applied to screen broadly for a wide range of vaccine‐AE associations within a large health care data network.

Zhou H, Thompson WW, Belongia EA, Fowlkes A, Baxter R, Jacobsen SJ, Jackson ML, Glanz JM, Naleway AL, Ford DC, Weintraub E, Shay DK. Estimated rates of influenza-associated outpatient visits during 2001-2010 in six US integrated health care delivery organizations . Influenza. Other Respir. Viruses. 2018 Jan; 12(1): 122-131. Epub 2018 Feb 15.

Influenza (flu) related illnesses are responsible for many morbidity cases during each flu season, but these illnesses are difficult to count: symptoms are non-specific, diagnostic codes for flu-related symptoms are broad, and lab testing is not routine. This makes population-based estimates of flu-related outpatient visits during flu epidemics or pandemics uncommon. In this study using data from 6 Vaccine Safety Datalink sites from 2001-2010, researchers estimated flu-related outpatient visits. Researchers modeled the rates of outpatient visits with diagnostic codes of pneumonia or acute respiratory visits. Of the nearly 7.7 million people enrolled, children had higher estimated flu-related outpatient rates than adults during pre-pandemic and pandemic seasons. Rates estimated with pneumonia visits plus flu-coded visits were similar to previous studies using confirmed flu cases. These numbers are crucial for measuring the potential benefits of flu prevention and treatment.

McNeil MM, DeStefano F. Vaccine-associated hypersensitivity . J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2018 Feb; 141(2): 463-472.

Vaccines are considered one of the most effective public health interventions – resulting in major reductions of vaccine preventable diseases and death. Vaccine-associated hypersensitivity reactions are not infrequent; however, serious acute-onset anaphylaxis reactions are extremely rare. Risk of anaphylaxis after all vaccines is estimated to be 1.31 per million vaccine doses administered. This review focuses on serious hypersensitivity reactions following flu vaccines, given the large number of people vaccinated yearly and the formulation changes the vaccines go through each year to match circulating flu viruses. Recent advances in vaccine technology, along with new vaccines and the universal flu vaccination recommendation (people 6 months of age and older), make continued safety monitoring for hypersensitivity reactions following flu vaccination particularly important.

McNeil MM, Hibbs BF, Miller ER, Cano MV. Notes from the Field: Errors in Administration of an Excess Dosage of Yellow Fever Vaccine – United States, 2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 Jan 26; 67:109-110.

Following a March 2017 report to Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) of four persons receiving incorrect dosages of yellow fever vaccine, CDC conducted a VAERS search and literature review for similar reported administration errors. Reports were few (15 in VAERS; 67 in literature) and most did not involve an adverse event. However, the error was costly in terms of medical follow-up and vaccine wastage. More distinctive single/multi-dose packaging and in-service training might prevent future errors.

Hibbs BF, Miller E, Shi J, Smith K, Lewis P, Shimabukuro TT. Safety of Vaccines That Have Been Kept Outside of Recommended Temperatures: Reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2008-2012. Vaccine. 2018 Jan 25;36(4):553-558.

This review does not indicate any substantial direct health risk from administration of vaccines kept outside of recommended temperatures. However, there are potential costs and risks, including vaccine wastage, possible decreased protection, and patient inconvenience related to revaccination. Maintaining high vigilance, proper staff training, regular equipment maintenance, and having adequate auxiliary power are important components of comprehensive vaccine cold chain management.

Haber P, Moro PL, Ng C, Lewis PW, Hibbs B, Schillie SF, Nelson NP, Li R, Stewart B, Cano MV. Safety of Currently Licensed Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Vaccines in the United States, Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2005-2015. Vaccine . 2018 Jan 25;26(4):559-564.

This study is based on a national vaccine safety data and reassures the public on the safety of Hepatitis B vaccine(s). Although it reveals increased reports of vaccine storage errors, and incorrect dose or wrong vaccine given to infants or adults, no adverse events are noted. The findings highlight the need for education and training of health providers on prevention of vaccine administration errors.

Schillie S, Vellozzi C, Reingold A, Harris A, Haber P, Ward JW, Nelson NP. Prevention of Hepatitis B Virus Infection in the United States: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. MMWR Recomm Rep . 2018 Jan 12; 67(No. RR-1):1-31.

Hepatitis B is a serious disease that affects the liver. The virus is highly infectious and can be transmitted in the absence of visible blood. As part of the recommended immunization schedule for infants and children, Hepatitis B vaccine should be given to children in three doses between birth and 18 months of age. In January 2018, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) published new recommendations for the vaccine. These include: 1) administration of the universal hepatitis B vaccination within 24 hours of birth of medically stable infants, 2) testing pregnant women for Hepatitis B, 3) post-vaccination serologic testing for infants whose mother has an unknown hepatitis B status, and 4) the removal of lenient language for delaying the birth dose until after hospital discharge. Vaccine safety information was updated to include data from the pre- and post-licensure studies and report information from the Vaccine Adverse Events Report System from 2005 to 2015.

Newcomer SR, Kulldorff M, Xu S, Daley MF, Fireman B, Lewis E, Glanz JM. Bias from outcome misclassification in immunization schedule safety research . Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf . 2018 Feb; 27(2): 221-228. Epub 2018 Jan 2.

The Institute of Medicine in 2013 recommended conducting observational studies of the childhood immunization schedule safety. However, these studies present a methodical challenge because of bias from misclassification of outcomes in electronic health record data. Using simulations, researchers evaluated the percent of valid diagnoses (positive predictive values, PPVs) as indicators of bias of an exposure-outcome association, and quantitative bias analyses methods used for bias correction. Overall outcome PPVs did not reflect the distribution of false positives by exposure and are poor indicators of bias in individual studies. Quantitative bias analysis was effective in correcting outcome misclassification bias and should be considered in immunization schedule research.

Moro PL, Zheteyeva WY, Barash F, Lewis P, Cano M. Assessing the Safety of Hepatitis B Vaccination During Pregnancy in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 1990-2016. Vaccine . 2018 Jan 2;26(1):50-54.

Few studies have been done on the safety of hepatitis B vaccine in pregnant women. This review describes adverse events after Hepatitis B vaccination of pregnant women reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS). During the period from January 1, 1990 to June 30, 2016, VAERS received 192 reports involving pregnant women following Hepatitis B vaccination. No new or unexpected safety concerns were found.

Tamez RL, Tan WV, O’Malley JT, Broder KR, Garzon MC, LaRussa P, Lauren CT. Influenza B Virus Infection and Stevens-Johnson Syndrome. Pediatr Dermatol. 2018 Jan;35(1);e45-e48.

Stevens-Johnson Syndrome (SJS) is a rare, serious disorder that affects the skin and the areas that creates and releases mucus. It starts as flu-like symptoms, and leads to a rash and blisters. Patients who develop SJS require hospitalization to manage the symptoms and identify the cause. This case reviewed SJS in a 2-year-old boy with influenza B infection. He was up to date on his immunizations, including the influenza vaccine 3 months prior to coming to coming to the hospital. He was treated with antiviral oseltamivir and IV treatment’, and his symptoms cleared up. With his diagnosis of influenza type B and SJS, there were still concerns of re-exposure to influenza B antigen during next season’s vaccination. The boy received the quadrivalent inactivated influenza vaccine the following season, was monitored and tolerated the vaccine well without reports of adverse reactions. Medical evaluation concluded that the patient’s influenza B infection was the most likely cause of SJS.

Tamez RL, Tan WV, O’Malley JT, Broder KR, Garzon MC, LaRussa P, Lauren CT.  Influenza B virus infection and Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Pediatr Dermatol. 2018 Jan; 35(1):e45-e48. Epub 2017 Dec 28.

Storms AD, Chen J, Jackson LA, Nordin JD, Naleway AL, Glanz JM, Jacobsen SJ, Weintraub ES, Klein NP, Gargiullo PM, Fry AM . Rates and risk factors associated with hospitalization for pneumonia with ICU admission among adults . BMC. Pulm. Med. 2017 Dec 16; 17(1): 208.

Hibbs BF, Miller E, Shi J, Smith K, Lewis P, Shimabukuro TT. Safety of vaccines that have been kept outside of recommended temperatures: Reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2008-2012 .  Vaccine . 2018 Jan 25; 36(4):553-558. Epub 2017 Dec 14.

Haber P, Moro PL, Ng C, Lewis PW, Hibbs B, Schillie SF, Nelson NP, Li R, Stewart B, Cano MV. Safety of currently licensed hepatitis B surface antigen vaccines in the United States, Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2005-2015 . Vaccine . 2018 Jan 25; 36(4):559-564. Epub 2017 Dec 11.

Groom HC, Irving SA, Caldwell J, Larsen R, Beaudrault S, Luther LM, Naleway AL. Implementing a Multipartner HPV Vaccination Assessment and Feedback Intervention in an Integrated Health System . J. Public Health Manag. Pract. 2017 Nov/Dec; 23(6): 589-592.

Loharikar A, Suragh TA, MacDonald NE, Balakrishnan MR, Benes O, Lamprianou S, Hyde TB, McNeil MM. Anxiety-related adverse events following immunization (AEFI): A systematic review of published clusters of illness . Vaccine . 2018 Jan 4; 36(2):299-305. Epub 2017 Nov 29.

Moro PL, Zheteyeva Y, Barash F, Lewis P, Cano M. Assessing the safety of hepatitis B vaccination during pregnancy in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 1990-2016 . Vaccine . 2018 Jan 2; 36(1):50-54. Epub 2017 Nov 27.

Daley MF, Clarke CL, Glanz JM, Xu S, Hambidge SJ, Donahue JG, Nordin JD, Klein NP, Jacobsen SJ, Naleway AL, Jackson ML, Lee G, Duffy J, Weintraub E. The safety of live attenuated influenza vaccine in children and adolescents 2 through 17 years of age: A Vaccine Safety Datalink study . Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf . 2018 Jan; 27(1): 59-68. Epub 2017 Nov 17.

Myers TR, McNeil MM, Current safety issues with quadrivalent meningococcal conjugate vaccines. Hum Vaccin Immunother , 2018 May 4; 14(5): 1175-1178; Epub 2017 Nov 8.

Kemper AR, Barnett ED, Walter EB, Hornik C, Pierre-Joseph N, Broder KR, Silverstein M, Harrington T. Drinking Water to Prevent Postvaccination Presyncope in Adolescents: A Randomized Trial. Pediatrics 2017 Nov; 140(5).

Arana J, Mba-Jonas A, Jankosky C, Lewis P, Moro PL, Shimabukuro TT, Cano M. Reports of Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome After Human Papillomavirus Vaccination in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System . J Adolesc Health . 2017 Nov; 61 (5): 577-582.

Stockwell MS, Marchant CD, Wodi AP, Barnett ED, Broder KR, Jakob K, Lewis P, Kattan M, Rezendes AM, Barrett A, Sharma D, Fernandez N, LaRussa P. A multi-site feasibility study to assess fever and wheezing in children after influenza vaccines using text messaging. Vaccine. 2017 Dec 15; 35(50):6941-6948. Epub 2017 Oct 28.

Izurieta HS, Moro PL, Chen RT.  Hospital-based collaboration for epidemiological investigation of vaccine safety: A potential solution for low and middle-income countries? Vaccine . 2018 Jan 8; 36(3):345-346. Epub 2017 Oct 21.

McCarthy NL, Sukumaran L, Newcomer S, Glanz J, Daley MF, McClure D, Klein NP, Irving S, Jackson ML, Lewin B, Weintraub E. Patterns of childhood immunization and all-cause mortality . Vaccine. 2017 Dec 4; 35(48 Pt B): 6643-6648. Epub 2017 Oct 20.

Walter EB, Hornik CP, Grohskopf L, McGee CE, Todd CA, Museru OI, Harrington L, Broder KR.  The effect of antipyretics on immune response and fever following receipt of inactivated influenza vaccine in young children . Vaccine. 2017 Dec 4; 35(48 Pt B): 6664-6671. Epub 2017 Oct 19.

VanWormer JJ, Bendixsen CG, Vickers ER, Stokley S, McNeil MM, Gee J, Belongia EA, McLean HQ. Association between parent attitudes and receipt of human papillomavirus vaccine in adolescents . BMC. Public Health . 2017 Oct 2; 17(1): 766.

Donahue JG, Kieke BA, King JP, DeStefano F, Mascola MA, Irving SA, Cheetham TC, Glanz JM, Jackson LA, Klein NP, Naleway AL, Weintraub E, Belongia EA. Association of spontaneous abortion with receipt of inactivated influenza vaccine containing H1N1pdm09 in 2010-11 and 2011-12 . Vaccine . 2017 Sep 25; 35(40): 5314-5322.

Gee J, Sukumaran L, Weintraub E. Risk of Guillain-Barre Syndrome following quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine in the Vaccine Safety Datalink . Vaccine . 2017 Oct 13; 35(43): 5756-5758. Epub 2017 Sep 19.

Eaton A, Lewis N, Fireman B, Hansen J, Baxter R, Gee J, Klein NP. Birth outcomes following immunization of pregnant women with pandemic H1N1 influenza vaccine 2009-2010 . Vaccine. 2017 May 3; 36(19): 2733-2739. Epub 2017 Sep 13.

Vickers ER, McClure DL, Naleway AL, Jacobsen SJ, Klein NP, Glanz JM, Weintraub ES, Belongia EA . Risk of venous thromboembolism following influenza vaccination in adults aged 50years and older in the Vaccine Safety Datalink . Vaccine. 2017 Oct 13; 35(43): 5872-5877. Epub 2017 Sep 6.

Woo EJ, Moro PL, Cano M, Jankosky C.  Postmarketing safety surveillance of trivalent recombinant influenza vaccine: Reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System. Vaccine . 2017 Oct 9;35(42):5618-5621. Epub 2017 Sep 5.

Stockwell MS, Broder KR, Lewis P, Jakob K, Iqbal S, Fernandez N, Sharma D, Barrett A, LaRussa P. Assessing Fever Frequency After Pediatric Live Attenuated Versus Inactivated Influenza Vaccination.   J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2017 Sep 1; 6(3):e7-e14.

Shaw J, Halsey NA, Weinberg A, Scott Schmid D, George KS, Weldon WC, Jordan M, Bryant PW, LaRussa P, Bradshaw DY, Harrington T, Gershon A. Arm Paralysis After Routine Childhood Vaccinations: Application of Advanced Molecular Methods to the Causality Assessment of an Adverse Event After Immunization . J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2017 Sep 1; 6(3): e161-e164.

Lipkind HS, Vazquez-Benitez G, Nordin JD, Romitti PA, Naleway AL, Klein NP, Hechter RC, Jackson ML, Hambidge SJ, Lee GM, Sukumaran L, Kharbanda EO. Maternal and Infant Outcomes After Human Papillomavirus Vaccination in the Periconceptional Period or During Pregnancy . Obstet. Gynecol. 2017 Sep; 130(3): 599-608.

Duffy J, Hambidge SJ, Jackson LA, Kharbanda EO, Klein NP, Naleway A, Omer SB, Weintraub E. Febrile Seizure Risk after Vaccination in Children One to Five Months of Age . Pediatr. Neurol. 2017 Nov; 76: 72-78. Epub 2017 Aug 23.

Moro PL, Cragan J, Lewis P, Sukumaran L.  Major Birth Defects after Vaccination Reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) 1990 to 2014 . Birth Defects Res . 2017 Jul 17; 109(13): 1057-1062.

Heininger U, Holm K, Caplanusi I, Bailey SR, CIOMS Working Group on Vaccine Safety. Guide to active vaccine safety surveillance: Report of CIOMS working group on vaccine safety – executive summary . Vaccine . 2017 Jul 13; 35(32):3917-3921. Epub 2017 Jun 20.

DeSilva M, Vazquez-Benitez G, Nordin JD, Lipkind HS, Klein NP, Cheetham TC, Naleway AL, Hambidge SJ, Lee GM, Jackson ML, McCarthy NL, Kharbanda EO. Maternal Tdap vaccination and risk of infant morbidity . Vaccine. 2017 Jun 22; 35(29): 3655-3660. Epub 2017 May 25.

Duffy J, Johnsen 2, Ferris M, Miller M, Leighton K, McGilvray M, McNamara L, Breakwell L, Yu Y, Bhavsar T, Briere E, Patel M . Safety of a meningococcal group B vaccine used in response to two university outbreaks . J Am Coll Health . 2017 Aug-Sep; 65(6):380-388. Epub 2017 May 8.

Stockwell MS, Cano M, Jakob K, Broder KR, Gyamfi-Bannerman C, Castaño PM, Lewis P, Barrett A, Museru OI, Castellanos O, LaRussa PS. Feasibility of Text Message Influenza Vaccine Safety Monitoring During Pregnancy. Am J Prev Med. 2017 Sep; 53(3):282-289. Epub 2017 May 8.

McLean HQ, VanWormer JJ, Chow BDW, Birchmeier B, Vickers E, DeVries E, Meyer J, Moore J, McNeil MM, Stokley S, Gee J, Belongia EA. Improving Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Use in an Integrated Health System: Impact of a Provider and Staff Intervention . J. Adolesc. Health . 2017 Aug; 61(2): 252-258. Epub 2017 Apr 24.

Ray GT, Lewis N, Goddard K, Ross P, Duffy J, DeStefano F, Baxter R, Klein NP. Asthma exacerbations among asthmatic children receiving live attenuated versus inactivated influenza vaccines . Vaccine 2017 May 9; 35(20): 2668-2675. Epub 2017 Apr 9.

Duffy J, Lewis M, Harrington T, Baxter R, Belongia EA, Jackson LA, Jacobsen SJ, Lee GM, Naleway AL, Nordin J, Daley MF . Live attenuated influenza vaccine use and safety in children and adults with asthma . Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol.   2017 April; 118(4):439-444.

Suragh TA, Miller ER, Hibbs BF, Winiecki SK, Zinderman C, Shimabukuro TT.  Cognitive testing to evaluate revisions to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) reporting form . Vaccine . 2017 Apr 25; 35(18):2295-2297. Epub 2017 Mar 25.

Kharbanda EO, Vazquez-Benitez G, Romitti PA, Naleway AL, Cheetham TC, Lipkind HS, Klein NP, Lee G, Jackson ML, Hambidge SJ, McCarthy N, DeStefano F, Nordin JD. First Trimester Influenza Vaccination and Risks for Major Structural Birth Defects in Offspring . J. Pediatr. 2017 Aug; 187: 234-239.e4. Epub 2017 Mar 24.

Daley MF, Glanz JM, Newcomer SR, Jackson ML, Groom HC, Lugg MM, McLean HQ, Klein NP, Weintraub ES, McNeil MM. Assessing misclassification of vaccination status: Implications for studies of the safety of the childhood immunization schedule . Vaccine . 2017 Apr 4; 35(15): 1873-1878. Epub 2017 Mar 9.

Myers TR, McNeil MM, Ng CS, Li R, Lewis PW, Cano MV. Adverse events following quadrivalent meningococcal CRM-conjugate vaccine (Menveo®) reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting system (VAERS), 2010-2015 . Vaccine . 2017 Mar 27; 35(14):1758-1763. Epub 2017 Mar 3.

Klein NP, Lewis E, McDonald J, Fireman B, Naleway A, Glanz J, Jackson LA, Donahue JG, Jacobsen SJ, Weintraub E, Baxter R. Risk factors and familial clustering for fever 7-10days after the first dose of measles vaccines. Vaccine . 2017 March 14; 35(12): 1615-1621. Epub 2017 Feb 21.

Su JR, Leroy Z, Lewis PW, Haber P, Marin M, Leung J, Woo EJ, Shimabukuro TT.  Safety of Second-Dose Single-Antigen Varicella Vaccine . Pediatrics . 2017 Mar; 139(3). Epub 2017 Feb 7.

Narwaney KJ, Breslin K, Ross CA, Shoup JA, Wain KF, Weintraub ES, McNeil,MM, Hambidge SJ. Vaccine adverse events in a safety net healthcare system and a managed care organization . Vaccine . 2017 March 1; 35(9): 1335-1340. Epub 2017 Feb 6.

Moro PL, Sukumaran L.  Cholera vaccination: pregnant women excluded no more . Lancet Infect Dis . 2017 May;17(5):469-470. Epub 2017 Feb 2.

Hambidge SJ, Ross C, Shoup JA, Wain K, Narwaney K, Breslin K, Weintraub ES, McNeil MM. Integration of data from a safety net health care system into the Vaccine Safety Datalink . Vaccine. 2017 March 1; 35(9): 1329-1334. Epub 2017 Feb 1.

Moro P, Baumblatt J, Lewis P, Cragan J, Tepper N, Cano M. Surveillance of Adverse Events After Seasonal Influenza Vaccination in Pregnant Women and Their Infants in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, July 2010-May 2016 . Drug Saf . 2017 Feb; 40(2):145-152.

Kharbanda EO, Vazquez-Benitez G, Romitti PA, Naleway AL, Cheetham TC, Lipkind HS, Sivanandam S, Klein NP, Lee GM, Jackson ML, Hambidge SJ, Olsen A, McCarthy N, DeStefano F, Nordin JD. Identifying birth defects in automated data sources in the Vaccine Safety Datalink . Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 2017 Apr; 26(4): 412-420. Epub 2017 Jan 4.

Moro PL, Cragan J, Lewis P, Sukumaran L. Major Birth Defects after Vaccination Reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 1990 to 2014. Birth Defects Res (2017).doi: 10.1002/bdra.23622

Moro PL, Sukumaran L. Cholera vaccination: pregnant women excluded no more. Lancet Infect Dis (2017);17(5):469-470. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(17)30055-5.

Bardenheier BH, Duffy J, Duderstadt SK, Higgs JB, Keith MP, Papadopoulos PJ, Gilliland WR, McNeil MM. Anthrax Vaccine and the Risk of Rheumatoid Arthritis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in the U.S. Military: A Case-Control Study . Mil Med . 2016 Oct;181(10):1348-1356.

Chen RT, Moro PL, Bauwens J, Bonhoeffer J. Obstetrical and neonatal case definitions for immunization safety data. Vaccine (2016);34(49):5991-5992. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.08.026.

Moro PL, Woo EJ, Paul W, Lewis P, Petersen BW, Cano M. Post-Marketing Surveillance of Human Rabies Diploid Cell Vaccine (Imovax) in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) in the United States, 1990‒2015. PLoS Negl Trop Dis (2016);10(7):e0004846. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004846.

Moro PL, Li R, Haber P, Weintraub E, Cano M. Surveillance systems and methods  for monitoring the post-marketing safety of influenza vaccines at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Expert Opin Drug Saf (2016);15(9):1175-83. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2016.1194823.

Moro PL, Cragan J, Tepper N, Zheteyeva Y, Museru O, Lewis P, Broder K. Enhanced surveillance of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccines in pregnancy in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2011-2015. Vaccine (2016);34(20):2349-53. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.03.049.

Lindsey NP, Rabe IB, Miller ER, Fischer M, Staples JE. Adverse event reports following yellow fever vaccination, 2007-13.  J Travel Med . 2016 Jul 4;23(5). doi: 10.1093/jtm/taw045

Miller ER, Moro PL, Cano M, Lewis P, Bryant-Genevier M, Shimabukuro TT. Post-licensure safety surveillance of 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 1990–2013.  Vaccine  2016, 34 (25): 2841-2846. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.04.021.

Su JR. Miller ER. Duffy J. Baer BM. Cano MV. Notes from the Field: Administration error involving a meningococcal conjugate vaccine-United States, March 1, 2010-Sept. 22, 2015.  MMWR  2016 65(06);161-162. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6506a4.

Moro, P., Baumblatt, J., Lewis, P. et al.  Surveillance of Adverse Events After Seasonal Influenza Vaccination in Pregnant Women and Their Infants in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, July 2010–May 2016.    Drug Saf  (2016). doi:10.1007/s40264-016-0482-1.

Abrams JY, Weintraub ES, Baggs JM, McCarthy NL, Schonberger LB, Lee GM, et al.  Childhood vaccines and Kawasaki disease, Vaccine Safety Datalink, 1996-2006 .  Vaccine . 2015 Jan 3;33(2):382-7.

Baker MA, Kaelber DC, Bar-Shain DS, Moro PL, Zambarano B, Mazza M, et al.  Advanced clinical decision support for vaccine adverse event detection and reporting .  Clin Infect Dis . 2015 Sep 15;61(6):864-70. Epub 2015 Jun 9.

Chen RT, Shimabukuro TT, Martin DB, Zuber PL, Weibel DM, Sturkenboom M.  Enhancing vaccine safety capacity globally: A lifecycle perspective .  Vaccine.  Epub 2015 Sep 30.

Chen RT, Shimabukuro TT, Martin DB, et al. Enhancing vaccine safety capacity globally: A lifecycle perspective . Vaccine . 2015 Nov 27;33 Suppl 4:D46-54.

Datwani H, Moro PL, Harrington T, Broder K.  Chorioamnionitis following vaccination in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System .  Vaccine . 2015 Jun 17;33(27):3110-3. Epub 2015 May 11.

Duffy J, Weintraub E, Vellozzi C, DeStefano F; Vaccine Safety Datalink.  Narcolepsy and influenza A(H1N1) pandemic 2009 vaccination in the United States .  Neurology . 2014 Nov 11;83(20):1823-30. Epub 2014 Oct 15.

Grohskopf LA, Sokolow LZ, Olsen SJ, Bresee JS, Broder KR, Karron RA.  Prevention and control of influenza with vaccines: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, United States, 2015-16 influenza season .  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep . 2015 Aug 7;64(30):818-25.

Haber P, Parashar UD, Haber M, DeStefano F.  Intussusception after monovalent rotavirus vaccine—United States, Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2008–2014 .  Vaccine . 2015 Sep 11;33(38):4873-7. Epub 2015 Aug 11.

Hibbs BF, Moro PL, Lewis P, Miller ER, Shimabukuro T.  Vaccination errors reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, United States, 2000–2013 .  Vaccine . 2015 Jun 22;33(28):3171-8. Epub 2015 May 14.

Iqbal S, Li R, Gargiullo P, Vellozzi C.  Relationship between Guillain-Barré syndrome, influenza-related hospitalizations, and influenza vaccine coverage .  Vaccine . 2015 Apr 21;33(17):2045-9. Epub 2015 Mar 4.

Iqbal S, Shi J, Seib K, Lewis P, Moro PL, Woo EJ, et al.   Preparation for global introduction of inactivated poliovirus vaccine: Safety evidence from the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, 2000-2012 .  Lancet Infect Dis . 2015 Oct;15(10):1175-82. Epub 2015 Aug 16.

Kharbanda EO, Vazquez-Benitez G, Lipkind HS, Klein NP, Cheetham TC, Naleway A, et al.  Evaluation of the association of maternal pertussis vaccination with obstetric events and birth outcomes .  JAMA . 2014 Nov 12;312(18):1897-904.

Klein NP, Lewis E, Fireman B, Hambidge SJ, Naleway A, Nelson JC, et al.  Safety of measles-containing vaccines in 1-Year-old children .  Pediatrics . 2015 Feb;135(2):e321-9. Epub 2015 Jan 5.

Lopalco PL, DeStefano F.  The complementary roles of Phase 3 trials and post-licensure surveillance in the evaluation of new vaccines .  Vaccine . 2015 Mar 24;33(13):1541-8. Epub 2014 Nov 4.

McNamara LA, Shumate AM, Johnsen P, MacNeil JR, Patel M, Bhavsar T, et al.  First use of a serogroup B meningococcal vaccine in the us in response to a university outbreak .  Pediatrics . 2015 May;135(5):798-804.

McNeil MM, Weintraub E, Duffy J, Sukumaran L,  Jacobsen SJ, Klein NP, et al.  Risk of anaphylaxis following vaccination in children and adults . J Allergy Clin Immunol. Epub 2015 Sep 28.

Miller ER, Moro PL, Cano M, Shimabukuro T.  Deaths following vaccination: What does the evidence show?   Vaccine . 2015 Jun 26;33(29):3288-92. Epub 2015 May 23.

Miller ER, Shimabukuro T, Hibbs B, Moro P, Broder K, Vellozzi C.  Vaccine safety resources for nurses .  Am J Nurs . 2015 Aug; 115(8):55-58.

Moro PL, Arana J, Cano M, Lewis P, Shimabukuro TT.  Deaths reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, United States, 1997-2013 .  Clin Infect Dis . 2015 Sep 15;61(6):980-7. Epub 2015 May 28.

Moro PL, Jankosky C, Menschik D, Lewis P, Duffy J, Stewart B, et al.  Adverse events following Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccines in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, 1990-2013 .  J Pediatr . 2015 Apr;166(4):992-7. Epub 2015 Jan 15.

Moro PL, McNeil MM, Sukumaran L, Broder KR.  The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s public health response to monitoring Tdap safety in pregnant women in the United States .  Hum Vaccin Immunother . Epub 2015 Sep 17.

Moro PL, Zheteyeva Y, Lewis P, Shi J, Yue X, Museru OI, et al.  Safety of quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine (Gardasil®) in pregnancy: Adverse events among non-manufacturer reports in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, 2006-2013.   Vaccine . 2015 Jan; 33(4): 519-22.

Payne DC, Baggs J, Klein NP, Parashar UD.  Does preventing rotavirus infections through vaccination also protect against naturally occurring intussusception over time?   Clin Infect Dis . 2015 Jan 1;60(1):163-4.

Petrosky E, Bocchini JA Jr, Hariri S, Chesson H, Curtis CR, Saraiya M, et al; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).  Use of 9-valent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine: updated HPV vaccination recommendations of the advisory committee on immunization practices .  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep . 2015 Mar 27;64(11):300-4.

Rabe IB, Miller ER., Fischer M, Hills SL.  Adverse events following vaccination with an inactivated, Vero cell culture-derived Japanese encephalitis vaccine in the United States, 2009-2012 .  Vaccine . 2015 Jan 29;33(5):708-12.

Rha B, Tate JE, Weintraub E, Haber P, Yen C, Patel M, Cortese MM.  Intussusception following rotavirus vaccination: An updated review of the available evidence .  Expert Rev Vaccines . 2014 Nov;13(11):1339-48. Epub 2014 Jul 26.

Stratton KG, Cook AJ, Jackson LA, Nelson JC.  Simulation study comparing exposure matching with regression adjustment in an observational safety setting with group sequential monitoring .  Stat Med . 2015 Mar 30;34(7):1117-33.

Shimabukuro TT, Nguyen M, Martin D, DeStefano F.  Safety monitoring in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) .  Vaccine . 2015 Aug 26;33(36):4398-405. Epub 2015 Jul 22.

Sukumaran L, McCarthy NL, Kharbanda EO, McNeil MM, Naleway AL, Klein NP, et al.  Association of Tdap vaccination with acute events and adverse birth outcomes among pregnant women with prior tetanus-containing immunizations .  JAMA . 2015 Oct 20;314(15):1581-1587.

Sukumaran L, McCarthy NL, Kharbanda EO, Weintraub ES, Vasquez-Benitez G, McNeil MM, et al.  Safety of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis and influenza vaccinations in pregnancy.   Obstet Gynecol . 2015 Nov;126(5):1069-74.

Sukumaran L, McCarthy NL, Li R, Weintraub ES, Jacobsen SJ, Hambidge SJ, et al.  Demographic characteristics of members of the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD): A comparison with the United States population .  Vaccine . 2015 Aug 26;33(36):4446-50. Epub 2015 Jul 23.

Sukumaran L, McNeil MM, Moro PL, Lewis PW, Winiecki SK, Shimabukuro TT.  Adverse events following measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine in adults reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2003-2013.   Clin Infect Dis . 2015 May 15;60(10):e58-65.

Briere EC, Rubin L, Moro PL, Cohn A, Clark T, Messonnier N.  Prevention and control of haemophilus influenzae type b disease: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) .  MMWR.  2014 Feb 28;63(RR-01):1-14.

Daley MF, Yih WK, Glanz JM, Hambidge SJ, Narwaney KJ, Yin R, et al.  Safety of diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis and inactivated poliovirus (DTaP-IPV) vaccine .  Vaccine.  2014;32(25):3019-3024.

Duffy J, Weintraub, E, Vellozzi, C, DeStefano F.  Narcolepsy and influenza A(H1N1) pandemic 2009 vaccination in the United States .  Neurology . 2014;83(20):1823-30.

Grohskopf LA, Olsen SJ, Sokolow LZ, Bresee JS, Cox NJ, et al.  Prevention and control of seasonal influenza with vaccines: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) — United States, 2014–15 influenza season .  MMWR . 2014 Aug 15;63(32):691-697.

Haber P, Moro PL, McNeil MM, Lewis P, Woo EJ, Hughes H, Shimabukuro TT.  Post-licensure surveillance of trivalent live attenuated influenza vaccine in adults, United States, Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), July 2005-June 2013 . Vaccine. 2014 Nov;32(48):6499-504.

Haber P, Moro PL, McNeil MM, Lewis P, Woo EJ, Hughes H, et al.  Post-licensure surveillance of trivalent live attenuated influenza vaccine in children aged 2-18 years, Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), United States, July 2005-June 2012 .  J Ped Infect Dis . Epub 2014 May 7.

Hambidge SJ, Newcomer SR, Narwaney KJ, Glanz JM, Daley MF, Xu S, et al.  Timely versus delayed early childhood vaccination and seizures. Pediatrics . 2014 Jun;133(6):e1492-9.

Hibbs BF, Miller ER, Shimabukuro T; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).  Notes from the field: Rotavirus vaccine administration errors–United States, 2006-2013 .  MMWR . 2014 Jan;63(4):81.

Hofstetter AM, Jakob K, Klein NP, Dekker CL, Edwards KM, et al.  Live vaccine use and safety in DiGeorge syndrome .  Pediatrics . 2014 Apr;133(4):e946-54.

Jackson ML, Peterson D, Nelson JC, Greene SK, Jacobsen SJ, Belongia EA, et al.  Using winter 2009-2010 to assess the accuracy of methods which estimate influenza-related morbidity and mortality .  Epidemiol Infect . 2014 Dec 12:1-9.

Kawai AT, Li L, Kulldorff M, Vellozzi C, Weintraub E, Baxter R, et al.  Absence of associations between influenza vaccines and increased risks of seizures, Guillain-Barre syndrome, encephalitis, or anaphylaxis in the 2012-2013 season .  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf . 2014;23(5):548-553.

Kharbanda EO, Vazquez-Benitez G, Lipkind HS, Klein NP, Cheetham TC, Naleway A, et al.  Evaluation of the association of maternal pertussis vaccination with obstetric events and birth outcomes.   JAMA . 2014 Nov;312(18):1897-904.

Kharbanda EO, Vazquez-Benitez G, Lipkind H, Naleway AL, Klein NP, Cheetham TC, et al.  Receipt of pertussis vaccine during pregnancy across 7 Vaccine Safety Datalink sites .  Prev Med . 2014 Oct;67:316-9.

Li R, Stewart B, Weintraub E, McNeil MM.  Continuous sequential boundaries for vaccine safety surveillance .  Stat Med.  2014 Aug 30;33(19):3387-3397.

Lopalco PL, DeStefano F.  The complementary roles of Phase 3 trials and post-licensure surveillance in the evaluation of new vaccines .  Vaccine . 2015 Mar 24;33(13):1541-8.

McNeil MM, Cano M, Miller ER, Petersen BW, Engler RJ, Bryant-Genevier MG.  Ischemic cardiac events and other adverse events following ACAM2000® smallpox vaccine in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System .  Vaccine . 2014 Aug 20;32(37):4758-65.

McNeil MM, Gee J, Weintraub ES, Belongia EA, Lee GM, Glanz JM, et al.  The Vaccine Safety Datalink: Successes and challenges monitoring vaccine safety .  Vaccine.  2014 Sep 22;32(42):5390-5398.

Moro PL, Museru OI, Niu M, Lewis P, Broder K.  Reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System after hepatitis A and hepatitis AB vaccines in pregnant women .  Am J Obstet Gynecol . 2014 Jun;210(6):561.e1-6

Naleway AL, Irving SA, Henninger ML, Li DK, Shifflett P, Ball S, et al.  Safety of influenza vaccination during pregnancy: A review of subsequent maternal obstetric events and findings from two recent cohort studies .  Vaccine . 2014;32(26):3122-3127.

Naleway AL, Kurosky S, Henninger ML, Gold R, Nordin JD, Kharbanda EO, et al.  Vaccinations given during pregnancy, 2002-2009: a descriptive study .  Am J Prev Med.  2014;46(2):150-157.

Nelson JC, Shortreed SM, Yu O, Peterson D, Baxter R, Fireman B, et al.  Integrating database knowledge and epidemiological design to improve the implementation of data mining methods to evaluate vaccine safety in large healthcare databases .  Stat Anal Data Min . 2014 Oct;7(5):337–351.

Nordin JD, Kharbanda EO, Vazquez-Benitez G, Lipkind H, Lee GM, Naleway AL.  Monovalent H1N1 influenza vaccine safety in pregnant women, risks for acute adverse events .  Vaccine . 2014 Sep 3;32(39):4985-4992.

Nordin JD, Kharbanda EO, Vazquez Benitez G, Lipkind H, Vellozzi C, Destefano F; Vaccine Safety Datalink.  Maternal influenza vaccine and risks for preterm or small for gestational age birth.   J Pediatr . 2014 May;164(5):1051-1057.e2.

Stockwell MS, Broder K, LaRussa P, Lewis P, Fernandez N, Sharma D, et al.  Risk of fever after pediatric trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine and 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine.   JAMA Pediatr . 2014 Mar;168(3):211-9.

Tartof SY, Tseng HF, Liu IL, Qian L, Sy LS, Hechter RC, et al.  Inpatient admission for febrile seizure and subsequent outcomes do not differ in children with vaccine-associated versus non-vaccine associated febrile seizures .  Vaccine . 2014;32(48):6408-14.

Tartof SY, Tseng HF, Liu AL, Qian L, Sy LS, Hechter RC, et al.  Exploring the risk factors for vaccine-associated and non-vaccine associated febrile seizures in a large pediatric cohort .  Vaccine . 2014;32(22):2574-2581

Weintraub ES, Baggs J, Duffy J, Vellozzi C, Belongia EA, Irving S, et al.  Risk of intussusception after monovalent rotavirus vaccination .  N Engl J Med . 2014 Feb; 370:513-519.

Xu S, Newcomer S, Nelson J, Qian L, McClure D, Pan Y, et al.  Signal detection of adverse events with imperfect confirmation rates in vaccine safety studies using self-controlled case series design .  Biom J . 2014 May;56(3):513-25.

Baxter R, Bakshi N, Fireman B, Lewis E, Ray P, Vellozzi C, et al.  Lack of association of Guillain-Barre syndrome with vaccinations .  Clin Infect Dis . 2013 Jul;57(2):197-204.

DeStefano F, Price CS, Weintraub ES.  Increasing exposure to antibody-stimulating proteins and polysaccharides in vaccines Is not associated with risk of autism .  J Pediatr . 2013 Aug;163(2):561-7.

Dodd CN, Romio SA, Black S, Vellozzi C, Andrews N, Sturkenboom M, et al.  International collaboration to assess the risk of Guillain Barré Syndrome following influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccines .  Vaccine . 2013 Sep;31(40):4448-58.

Glanz JM, Narwaney KJ, Newcomer SR, Daley MF, Hambidge SJ, Rowhani-Rahbar A, et al.  Association between undervaccination with Diphtheria. Tetanus Toxoids, and Acellular Pertussis (DTaP) vaccine and risk of pertussis infection in children 3 to 36 months of age.   JAMA Pediatr . 2013 Nov;167(11):1060-4.

Glanz JM, Newcomer SR, Narwaney KJ, Hambidge SJ, Daley MF, Wagner NM, et al.  A population-based cohort study of undervaccination in 8 managed care organizations across the United States .  JAMA Pediatr.  2013;167(3):274-281.

Gold R, Naleway A, Riedlinger K.  Factors predicting completion of the human papillomavirus vaccine series .  J Adolesc Health.  2013;52(4):427-432.

Greene SK, Li L, Shay DK, Fry AM, Lee GM, Jacobsen SJ, et al.  Risk of adverse events following oseltamivir treatment in influenza outpatients, Vaccine Safety Datalink Project, 2007-2010 .  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf . 2013;22(4):335-344.

Greene SK, Rett MD, Vellozzi C, Li L, Kulldorff M, Marcy SM, et al.  Guillain-Barré syndrome, influenza vaccination, and antecedent respiratory and gastrointestinal infections: A case-centered analysis in the Vaccine Safety Datalink, 2009-2011 .  PLoS One . 2013 Jun;8(6):e67185.

Haber P, Patel M, Pan Y, Baggs J, Haber M, Museru O, et al.  Intussusception after Rotavirus Vaccines—United States, Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2006-2012 .  Pediatrics.  2013 Jun;131(6):1042-9.

Halsey NA, Griffioen M, Dreskin SC, Dekker CL, Wood R, Sharma D, et al.  Immediate hypersensitivity reactions following monovalent 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) vaccines: Reports to VAERS.   Vaccine . 2013 Dec;31(51):6107-12.

Hechter RC, Qian L, Sy LS, Greene SK, Weintraub ES, Naleway AL, et al.  Secular trends in diagnostic code density in electronic healthcare data from health care systems in the Vaccine Safety Datalink Project .  Vaccine . 2013 Feb;31(7):1080-85.

Henninger M, Crane B, Naleway A.  Trends in influenza vaccine coverage in pregnant women, 2008 to 2012 .  Perm J.  2013;17(2):31-36.

Henninger M, Naleway A, Crane B, Donahue J, Irving S.  Predictors of seasonal influenza vaccination during pregnancy .  Obstet Gynecol.  2013;121(4):741-749.

Iqbal S, Barile JP, Thompson WW, DeStefano F.  Number of antigens in early childhood vaccines and neuropsychological outcomes at age 7-10 years .  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf . 2013;22(12):1263-1270.

Irving SA, Kieke BA, Donahue JG, Mascola MA, Baggs J, DeStefano F, et al.  Trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine and spontaneous abortion .  Obstet Gynecol.  2013;121(1):159-165.

Jackson ML, Yu O, Nelson JC, Naleway A, Belongia EA, Baxter R, et al.  Further evidence for bias in observational studies of influenza vaccine effectiveness: the 2009 influenza A(H1N1) pandemic .  Am J Epidemiol.  2013;178(8):1327-1336.

Jackson LA, Peterson D, Nelson JC, Marcy SM, Naleway AL, Nordin JD, et al.  Vaccination site and risk of local reactions in children 1 through 6 years of age .  Pediatrics . 2013 Feb;131(2):283-9.

Kharbanda EO, Vazquez-Benitez G, Lipkind H, Naleway A, Lee G, Nordin JD; Vaccine Safety Datalink.  Inactivated influenza vaccine during pregnancy and risks for adverse obstetric events.   Obstet Gynecol . 2013 Sep;122(3):659-67.

Kharbanda EO, Vazquez-Benitez G, Shi WX, Lipkind H, Naleway A, Molitor B, et al.  Assessing the safety of influenza immunization during pregnancy: the Vaccine Safety Datalink .  Am J Obstet Gynecol.  2012;207(3 Suppl):S47-S51.

McCarthy NL, Gee J, Lin ND, Thyagarajan V, Pan Y, Su S, et al.  Evaluating the safety of influenza vaccine using a claims-based health system .  Vaccine . 2013 Dec;31(50):5975-82.

McCarthy NL, Weintraub E, Vellozzi C, Duffy J, Gee J, Donahue JG, et al.  Mortality rates and cause-of-death patterns in a vaccinated population .  Am J Prev Med . 2013 Jul;45(1):91-7.

McCarthy NL, Irving S, Donahue JG, Weintraub E, Gee J, Belongia E, et al.  Vaccination coverage levels among children enrolled in the Vaccine Safety Datalink.   Vaccine . 2013 Dec;31(49):5822.

McNeil MM, Li R, Pickering S, Real TM, Smith PJ, Pemberton MR, et al.  Who is unlikely to report adverse events after vaccinations to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)?   Vaccine . 2013 May;31(24):2673-9. 2013 Apr.

Moro PL, Harrington T, Shimabukuro T, Cano M, Museru OI, Menschik D, et al.  Adverse events after Fluzone® Intradermal vaccine reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2011-2013 .  Vaccine . 2013 Oct;31(43):4984-7.

Moro PL, Museru OI, Broder K, Cragan J, Zheteyeva Y, Tepper N, et al.  Safety of influenza A (H1N1) 2009 live attenuated monovalent vaccine in pregnant women .  Obstet Gynecol . 2013 Dec;122(6):1271-8.

Naleway AL, Gold R, Kurosky S, Riedlinger K, Henninger ML, Nordin JD, et al.  Identifying pregnancy episodes, outcomes, and mother-infant pairs in the Vaccine Safety Datalink .  Vaccine . 2013;31(27):2898-2903.

Nelson JC, Yu O, Dominguez-Islas CP, Cook AJ, Peterson D, Greene SK, et al.  Adapting group sequential methods to observational postlicensure vaccine safety surveillance: Results of a pentavalent combination DTaP-IPV-Hib vaccine safety study .  Am J Epidemiol . 2013 Jan;177(2):131-41.

Nelson JC, Marsh T, Lumley T, Larson EB, Jackson LA, Jackson M, et al.  Validation sampling can reduce bias in health care database studies: an illustration using influenza vaccination effectiveness .  J Clin Epidemiol.  2013;66(8 Suppl):S110-S121.

Newcomer SR, Hambidge SJ, McClure DL, Daley MF, Klein NP, Glanz JM.  Factors that may explain observed associations between trivalent influenza vaccination and gastrointestinal illness in young children .  Vaccine . 2013;31(37):3894-3898.

Nordin JD, Parker ED, Vazquez-Benitez G, Kharbanda EO, Naleway A, Marcy SM, et al.  Safety of the yellow fever vaccine: a retrospective study .  J Travel Med.  2013;20(6):368-373.

Nordin JD, Kharbanda EO, Benitez GV, Nichol K, Lipkind H, Naleway A, et al.  Maternal safety of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in pregnant women.   Obstet Gynecol . 2013 Mar;121(3):519-25.

Pahud BA, Williams SE, Dekker CL, Halsey N, LaRussa P, et al.  Clinical assessment of serious adverse events in children receiving 2009 H1N1 vaccination .  Pediatr Infect Dis J . 2013 Feb;32(2):163-168.

Pan Y, Rose CE, Haber M, Ma Y, Carrasco JL, Stewart B, et al.  Assessing agreement of repeated binary measurements with an application to the CDC’s anthrax vaccine clinical trial .  Int J Biostat . 2013 Jul;9(1). 14.

Poli F, Overeem S, Lammers GJ, et al. Narcolepsy as an adverse event following immunization: case definition and guidelines for data collection, analysis and presentation . Vaccine . 2013 Jan 30;31(6):994-1007.

Qian L, Tseng HF, Sy LS, Jacobsen SJ.  Confounder adjustment in vaccine safety studies: Comparing three offset terms for case-centered approach .  Vaccine . 2013 Jan;31(2):431-5.

Rowhani-Rahbar A, Fireman B, Lewis E, Nordin J, Naleway A, Jacobsen SJ, et al.  Effect of age on the risk of fever and seizures following immunization with measles-containing vaccines in children .  JAMA Pediatr . 2013 Dec;167(12):1111-7.

Salmon DA, Proschan M, Forshee R, Gargiullo P, Bleser W, Burwen DR, et al.  Association between Guillain-Barre syndrome and influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent inactivated vaccines in the USA: a meta-analysis .  Lancet . 2013;381(9876):1461-1468.

Schmidt MA, Gold R, Kurosky SK, Daley MF, Irving SA, Gee J, et al.  Uptake, coverage, and completion of quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine in the Vaccine Safety Datalink, July 2006-June 2011.   J Adolesc Health . 2013 Nov;53(5):637-41.

Thyagarajan V, Su S, Gee J, Duffy J, McCarthy NL, Chan KA, et al.  Identification of seizures among adults and children following influenza vaccination using health insurance claims data.   Vaccine . 2013 Dec;31(50):5997-6002.

Tseng HF, Sy LS, Qian L, Marcy SM, Jackson LA, Glanz J, et al; Vaccine Safety Datalink.  Safety of a tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccine when used off-label in an elderly population.   Clin Infect Dis . 2013 Feb;56(3):315-21.

Williams SE, Edwards KM, Baxter RP, Larussa PS, Halsey NA, et al.  Comprehensive assessment of serious adverse events following immunization by health care providers .  J Pediatr . 2013 Jun;162(6):1276-81, 1281.e1.

Xu S, Hambidge SJ, McClure DL, Daley MF, Glanz JM, et al.  A scan statistic for identifying optimal risk windows in vaccine safety studies using self-controlled case series design .  Stat Med . 2013;30;32(19):3290-9.

Zeng C, Newcomer SR, Glanz JM, Shoup JA, Daley MF, Hambidge SJ, et al.  Bias correction of risk estimates in vaccine safety studies with rare adverse events using a self-controlled case series design .  Am J Epidemiol. 2013;178(12):1750-1759.

Zheteyeva Y, Moro PL, Yue X, Broder K.  Safety of meningococcal polysaccharide-protein conjugate vaccine in pregnancy: a review of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System.   Am J Obstet Gynecol . 2013 Aug;208(6):478.e1-6.

Baxter R, Lewis N, Bakshi N, Vellozzi C, Klein NP; CISA Network.  Recurrent Guillain-Barre syndrome following vaccination .  Clin Infect Dis . 2012 Mar;54(6):800-4.

Broder KR, Martin DB, Vellozzi C.  In the heat of a signal: Responding to a vaccine safety signal for febrile seizures after 2010–11 influenza vaccine in young children, United States.   Vaccine . 2012 Mar;30(11):2032-34.

Cano M, Lewis P, Ou AC, Sharma D, Vellozzi C, Broder KR.  Bell’s palsy cases following administration of influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccine reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) [PDF – 1.84 MB] .  J Vaccines Vaccin . 2012;3(2)134.

Greene SK, Rett M, Weintraub ES, Li L, Yin R, Amato AA, et al.  Risk of confirmed Guillain-Barre syndrome following receipt of monovalent inactivated influenza A (H1N1) and seasonal influenza vaccines in the Vaccine Safety Datalink project, 2009-2010 .  Am J Epidemiol.  2012;175(11):1100-1109.

Greene SK, Shay DK, Yin R, McCarthy NL, Baxter R, Jackson ML, et al.  Patterns in influenza antiviral medication use before and during the 2009 H1N1 pandemic, Vaccine Safety Datalink Project, 2000-2010 .  Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2012;6(6):e143-e151.

Halsey NA, Edwards KM, Dekker CL, Klein NP, Baxter R, et al.  Algorithm to assess causality after individual adverse events following immunizations . Vaccine. 2012 Aug 24;30(39):5791-8.

Hambidge SJ, Ross C, Glanz J, McClure D, Daley MF, Xu S, et al.  Trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine is not associated with sickle cell crises in children .  Pediatrics . 2012;129(1):e54-e59.

Hechter RC, Qian L, Sy LS, Greene SK, Weintraub ES, Naleway AL, et al.  Secular trends in diagnostic code density in electronic healthcare data from health care systems in the Vaccine Safety Datalink project .  Vaccine . 2012;31(7):1080-1085.

Klein NP, Lewis E, Baxter R, Weintraub E, Glanz J, Naleway A, et al.  Measles-containing vaccines and febrile seizures in children age 4 to 6 years .  Pediatrics . 2012;129(5):809-814.

Leroy Z, Broder K, Menschik D, Shimabukuro T, Martin D.  Febrile seizures after 2010–2011 influenza vaccine in young children, United States: A vaccine safety signal from the vaccine adverse event reporting system .  Vaccine.  2012;30(11):2020-3.

Loughlin AM, Marchant CD, Adams W, Barnett E, Baxter R, et al.  Causality assessment of adverse events reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) .  Vaccine . 2012 Nov 26;30(50):7253-9.

McClure DL, Xu S, Weintraub E, Glanz JM.  An efficient statistical algorithm for a temporal scan statistic applied to vaccine safety analyses .  Vaccine . 2012;30(27):3986-3991.

Moro PL, Tepper NK, Grohskopf LA, Vellozzi C, Broder K.  Safety of seasonal influenza and influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccines in pregnancy.   Expert Rev Vaccines . 2012 Aug;11(8):911-21.

Moro PL, Arana J, Cano M, Menschik D, Yue Lewis P, Haber P, et al.  Postlicensure safety surveillance for high-dose trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, 1 July 2010–31 December 2010 .   Clin Infect Dis.  2012;54(11):1608-14.

Naleway AL, Gold R, Drew L, Riedlinger K, Henninger ML, Gee J.  Reported adverse events in young women following quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccination .  J Womens Health (Larchmt.) . 2012;21(4):425-432.

Pahud BA, Rowhani-Rahbar A, Glaser C, Gavali S, Salibay CJ, et al.   Lack of association between childhood immunizations and encephalitis in California, 1998-2008 .  Vaccine . 2012 Jan 5;30(2):247-53.

Rowhani-Rahbar A, Baxter R, Rasgon B, Ray P, Black S, Klein JO, et al.  Epidemiologic and clinical features of Bell’s palsy among children in northern California .  Neuroepidemiology . 2012;38(4):252-258.

Rowhani-Rahbar A, Fireman B, Lewis N, Ray P, Rasgon B, Klein JO, et al.  Rowhani-Rahbar et al. respond to “Immunization and Bell’s palsy in children.”   Am J Epidemiol.  2012;175(9):888-889.

Rowhani-Rahbar A, Klein NP, Dekker CL, Edwards KM, Marchant CD, et al.  Biologically plausible and evidence-based risk intervals in immunization safety research .  Vaccine . 2012 Dec 17;31(1):271-7.

Rowhani-Rahbar A, Klein NP, Lewis N, Fireman B, Ray P, Rasgon B, et al.  Immunization and Bell’s palsy in children: a case-centered analysis .  Am J Epidemiol.  2012;175(9):878-885.

Shui IM, Baggs J, Patel M, Parashar UD, Rett M, Belongia EA, et al.  Risk of intussusception following administration of a pentavalent rotavirus vaccine in US infants .  JAMA . 2012;307(6):598-604.

Shui IM, Rett MD, Weintraub E, Marcy M, Amato AA, Sheikh SI, et al.  Guillain-Barré syndrome incidence in a large United States cohort (2000-2009) .  Neuroepidemiology . 2012;39(2):109-115.

Stewart B, Rose CE, Tokars JI, Martin SW, Keitel WA, Keyserling HL, et al.  Health-related quality of life in the CDC Anthrax Vaccine Adsorbed Human Clinical Trial.   Vaccine . 2012 Aug;30(40):5875-9.

Tokars JI, Lewis P, DeStefano F, Wise M, Viray M, Morgan O, Gargiullo P, Vellozzi C. The risk of Guillain-Barré syndrome associated with influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccine and 2009-2010 seasonal influenza vaccines: results from self-controlled analyses . Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf . 2012 May;21(5):546-52.

Tse A, Tseng HF, Greene SK, Vellozzi C, Lee GM, VSD Rapid Cycle Analysis Influenza Working Group.  Signal identification and evaluation for risk of febrile seizures in children following trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in the Vaccine Safety Datalink Project, 2010-2011 .  Vaccine . 2012;30(11):2024-2031.

Wise ME, Viray M, Sejvar JJ, Lewis P, Baughman AL, Connor W, Danila R, Giambrone GP, Hale C, Hogan BC, Meek JI, Murphree R, Oh JY, Reingold A, Tellman N, Conner SM, Singleton JA, Lu PJ, DeStefano F, Fridkin SK, Vellozzi C, Morgan OW. Guillain-Barre syndrome during the 2009-2010 H1N1 influenza vaccination campaign: population-based surveillance among 45 million Americans . Am J Epidemiol . 2012 Jun 1;175(11):1110-9.

Xu S, Zeng C, Newcomer S, Nelson J, Glanz J.  Use of fixed effects models to analyze self-controlled case series data in vaccine safety studies .  J Biom Biostat.  2012;Suppl 7:006.

Yih WK, Weintraub E, Kulldorff M.  No risk of Guillain-Barré syndrome found after meningococcal conjugate vaccination in two large cohort studies .  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf . 2012;21(12):1359-1360.

Zheteyeva YA, Moro PL, Tepper NK, Rasmussen SA, Barash FE, Revzina NV, et al.  Adverse event reports after tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccines in pregnant women .   Am J Obstet Gynecol.  2012 Jul; 207(1):59.e1-7.

Baggs J, Gee J, Lewis E, Fowler G, Benson P, Lieu T, et al.  The Vaccine Safety Datalink: A model for monitoring immunization safety.   Pediatrics . 2011 May;127 Suppl 1:S45-53.

Barile JP, Kuperminc GP, Weintraub ES, Mink JW, Thompson WW, et al.  Thimerosal exposure in early life and neuropsychological outcomes 7-10 years later .  J Pediatr Psychol.  2011;37(1):106-118.

Gee J, Naleway A, Shui I, Baggs J, Yin R, Li R, et al.  Monitoring the safety of quadrivalent human papillomavirus vaccine: findings from the Vaccine Safety Datalink.   Vaccine.  2011 Oct; 29(46):8279-84.

Gidudu J, Sack DA, Pina M, Hudson MJ, Kohl KS, Bishop P, et al.  Diarrhea: Case definition and guidelines for collection, analysis, and presentation of immunization safety data.   Vaccine . 2011 Jan;29(5): 1053-71.

Glanz JM, Newcomer SR, Hambidge SJ, Daley MF, Narwaney KJ, Xu S, et al.  Safety of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in children aged 24 to 59 months in the Vaccine Safety Datalink .  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011;165(8):749-755.

Greene SK, Kulldorff M, Yin R, Yih WK, Lieu TA, Weintraub ES, et al.  Near real-time vaccine safety surveillance with partially accrued data. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf . 2011 Jun;20(6):583-90

Haber P, Iskander J, Walton K, Campbell SR, Kohl KS., et al.  Internet-based reporting to the vaccine adverse event reporting system: a more timely and complete way for providers to support vaccine safety .  Pediatrics . 2011 May;127 Suppl 1: S39-44.

Hambidge SJ, Ross C, McClure D, Glanz J; VSD team.  Trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine is not associated with sickle cell hospitalizations in adults from a large cohort .  Vaccine . 2011;29(46):8179-8181.

Huang WT, Suh C, Campagna E, Broder KR, Daley MF, Crane LA, et al.  Adherence to the advisory committee on immunization practices recommendation to prevent injuries from postvaccination syncope: A national physician survey .  Am J Prev Med . 2011 Sep;41(3):317-21.

Jackson LA, Yu O, Nelson JC, Dominguez C, Peterson D, Baxter R, et al.  Injection site and risk of medically attended local reactions to acellular pertussis vaccine .  Pediatrics . 2011;127(3):e581-e587.

Jackson LA, Peterson D, Dunn J, Hambidge SJ, Dunstan M, Starkovichet P.  A randomized placebo-controlled trial of acetaminophen for prevention of post-vaccination fever in infants .  PLoS One.  2011;6(6):e20102.

Klein NP, Aukes L, Lee J, Fireman B, Shapira SK, Slade B, et al.  Evaluation of immunization rates and safety among children with inborn errors of metabolism.   Pediatrics . 2011 May;127(5):e1139-46.

Klein NP, Gidudu J, Qiang Y, Pahud B, Rowhani-Rahbar A, Baxter R, et al.  Developing the next generation of vaccinologists.   Vaccine . 2011 Nov;29(50):9296-97.

Kulldorff M, Davis RL, Kolczak M, Lewis E, Lieu T, Platt R.  A maximized sequential probability ratio test for drug and vaccine safety surveillance.   Seq Anal . 2011 Jan;30(1): 58-78.

LaRussa PS, Edwards KM, Dekker CL, Klein NP, Halsey NA, Marchant C, et al.  Understanding the role of human variation in vaccine adverse events: The Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment Network.   Pediatrics . 2011 May;127 Suppl 1:S65-73.

Lee GM, Greene SK, Weintraub ES, Baggs J, Kulldorff M, Fireman BH.  H1N1 and seasonal influenza vaccine safety in the Vaccine Safety Datalink project .  Am J Prev Med.  2011;41(2):121-128.

McCarthy NL, Gee J, Weintraub E, Donahue JG, Nordin JD, Daley MF, et al.  Monitoring vaccine safety using the Vaccine Safety Datalink: Utilizing immunization registries for pandemic influenza.   Vaccine . 2011 Jul; 29(31):4891-96.

Miller EK, Batten B, Hampton L, Campbell SR, Gao J, Iskander J.  Tracking vaccine-safety inquiries to detect signals and monitor public concerns.   Pediatrics . 2011 May;127 Suppl 1:S87-91.

Miller EK, Dumitrescu L, Cupp C, Dorris S, Taylor S, Sparks R.  Atopy history and the genomics of wheezing after influenza vaccination in children 6-59 months of age.   Vaccine . 2011 Apr;29(18):3431-37.

Morgan TM, Schlegel C, Edwards KM, Welch-Burke T, Zhu Y, Sparks R.  Vaccines are not associated with metabolic events in children with urea cycle disorders.   Pediatrics . 2011 May;127(5):e1147-53.

Moro PL, Broder K, Zheteyeva Y, Revzina N, Tepper N, Kissin D, et al.  Adverse events following administration to pregnant women of influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccine reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System .   Am J Obstet Gynecol.  2011; 205(5):473.e1-9.

Moro PL, Yue X, Lewis P, Haber P, Broder K.  Adverse events after tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine administered to adults 65 years of age and older reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2005-2010 .  Vaccine . 2011;29(50):9404-8.

Moro PL, Broder K, Zheteyeva Y, Walton K, Rohan P, Sutherland A, et al.  Adverse events in pregnant women following administration of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine and live attenuated influenza vaccine in the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, 1990-2009 . Am J Obstet Gynecol.  2011 Feb; 204(2):146.e1-7.

Mullooly JP, Schuler R, Mesa J, Drew L, DeStefano F; VSD team.  Wheezing lower respiratory disease and vaccination of premature infants .  Vaccine . 2011;29(44):7611-7617.

Navar-Boggan AM, Halsey NA, Escobar GJ, Golden WC, Klein NP.  Underimmunization in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit .  J Perinatol . 2012 May;32(5):363-7.

Nelson JC, Cook AJ, Yu O, et al.  Methods for observational post-licensure medical product safety surveillance .  Stat Methods Med Res.  Epub 2 Dec 2011.

Nordin JD, Yih WK, Kulldorff M, Weintraub E.  Tdap and GBS letter .  Vaccine . 2011 Feb;29(6):1122.

Pahud BA, Glaser CA, Dekker CL, Arvin AM, Schmid DS.  Varicella zoster disease of the central nervous system: Epidemiological, clinical, and laboratory features 10 years after the introduction of the varicella vaccine.   J Infect Dis . 2011 Feb;203(3):316-23.

Ray P, Black S, Shinefield H, et al.  Risk of rheumatoid arthritis following vaccination with tetanus, influenza and hepatitis B vaccines among persons 15-59 years of age .  Vaccine . 2011;29(38):6592-6597.

Salmon DA, Akhtar A, Mergler MJ, Vannice KS, Izurieta H, Ball R, et al.  Immunization-safety monitoring systems for the 2009 H1N1 monovalent influenza vaccination program.   Pediatrics . 2011 May;127 Suppl 1:S78-86.

Slade B, Gee J, Broder KR, Vellozzi C.  Comment on the contribution by Souayah et al., Guillain-Barré syndrome after Gardasil vaccination: Data from Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System 2006-2009 .  Vaccine . 2011 Jan;29(5):865-66.

Tseng HF, Liu A, Sy L, Marcy SM, Fireman B, Weintraub E, et al.  Safety of zoster vaccine in adults from a large managed care cohort: a Vaccine Safety Datalink study .  J Intern Med.  2011;271(5):510-520.

Williams SE, Pahud BA, Vellozzi C, Donofrio PD, Dekker CL, et al.  Causality assessment of serious neurologic adverse events following 2009 H1N1 vaccination . Vaccine . 2011 Oct 26;29(46):8302-8.

Williams SE, Klein NP, Halsey N, Dekker CL, Baxter RP, et al.  Overview of the clinical consult case review of adverse events following immunization: Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) Network 2004-2009 .  Vaccine . 2011 Sep 16;29(40):6920.

Woo EJ, Wise RP, Menschik D, Shadomy SV, Iskander J, Beeler J, et al.  Thrombocytopenia after vaccination: Case reports to the US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System , 1990-2008.  Vaccine . 2011 Feb;29(6):1319-23.

Xu S, Zhang L, Nelson JC, Zeng C, Mullooly J, McClure D, et al.  Identifying optimal risk windows for self-controlled case series studies of vaccine safety.   Stat Med . 2011 Mar;30(7):742-52.

Yen C, Jakob K, Esona MD, Peckham X, Rausch J, Hull JJ, et al.  Detection of fecal shedding of rotavirus vaccine in infants following their first dose of pentavalent rotavirus vaccine.   Vaccine . 2011 May;29(24):4151-55.

Yih WK, Kulldorff M, Fireman BH, Shui IM, Lewis EM, Klein NP, et al.  Active surveillance for adverse events: The experience of the Vaccine Safety Datalink project.   Pediatrics . 2011 May;127 Suppl 1: S54-S64.

Bakare N, Menschik D, Tiernan R, Hua W, Martin D.  Severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) and rotavirus vaccination: Reports to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS).   Vaccine . 2010 Sep;28(40):6609-12.

Belongia EA, Irving SA, Shui IM, Kulldorf M, Lewis E, Yin R, et al; Vaccine Safety Datalink  Real-time surveillance to assess risk of intussusception and other adverse events after pentavalent, bovine-derived rotavirus vaccine .  Pedatr Infect Dis J . 2010 Jan;29(1):1-5.

Fiore AE, Uyeki TM, Broder K, Finelli L, Euler GL, Singleton JA, et al. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).  Prevention and control of influenza with vaccines: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), 2010 .  MMWR . 2010 Aug;59(RR-8):1-62.

Goodman MJ, Nordin JD, Belongia EA, Mullooly JP, Baggs J.  Henoch-Schonlein purpura and polysaccharide meningococcal vaccine. Pediatrics . 2010 Aug;126(2):e325-29.

Greene SK, Kulldorff M, Lewis EM, Li R, Yin R, Weintraub ES, et al.  Near real-time surveillance for influenza vaccine safety: Proof of concept in the Vaccine Safety Datalink Project .  Am J Epidemiol . 2010 Jan;171(2):177-88. 2009 Dec.

Huang WT, Chang S, Miller ER, Woo EJ, Hoffmaster AR, Gee JE, et al.  Safety assessment of recalled Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) conjugate vaccines–United States, 2007-2008 .  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf . 2010 Mar;19(3):306-310.

Huang WT, Gargiullo PM, Broder KR, Weintraub ES, Iskander JK, Klein NP, et al; Vaccine Safety Datalink.  Lack of association between acellular pertussis vaccine and seizures in early childhood.   Pediatrics . 2010 Aug;126(2):263-9.

Klein NP, Fireman B, Yih WK, Lewis E, Kulldorff M, Ray P, et al; Vaccine Safety Datalink.  Measles-mumps-rubella-varicella combination vaccine and the risk of febrile seizures.   Pediatrics . 2010;126(1):e1-e8.

Klein NP, Gans HA, Sung P, Yasukawa LL, Johnson J, Sarafanov A, et al.  Preterm infants’ T cell responses to inactivated poliovirus vaccine.   J Infect Dis . 2010 Jan;201(2):214-22.

Li L, Kulldorff M.  A conditional maximized sequential probability ratio test for pharmacovigilance .  Stat Med . 2010 Jan;29: 284-95, 2010.

Lin ND, Kleinman K, Chan KA, Soumerai S, Mehta J, Mullooly JP, et al; Vaccine Safety Datalink.  Multiple vaccinations and the risk of medically attended fever .  Vaccine . 2010 Jun;28(25): 4169-74.

Lindsey NP, Staples JE, Jones JF, Sejvar JJ, Griggs A, Iskander J, et al.  Adverse event reports following Japanese encephalitis vaccination in the United States, 1999-2009.   Vaccine . 2010 Dec;29(1):58-64.

Marin M, Broder KR, Temte JL, Snider DE, Seward JF; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).  Use of combination measles, mumps, rubella, and varicella vaccine: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).   MMWR . 2010 May;59(RR-3):1-12.

McNeil MM, Broder KR, Vellozzi C, DeStefano F.  Risk of fatal adverse events after H1N1 influenza vaccine: Limitations of passive surveillance data.   Clin Infect Dis . 2010;51(7):871–72; author reply 872-3.

Muhammad RD, Haber P, Broder KR, Leroy Z, Ball R, Braun MM, et al.  Adverse events following trivalent inactivated influenza vaccination in children: Analysis of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System.   Pediatr Infect Dis J . 2010 Jan;30(1):e1-e8.

Navar-Boggan AM, Halsey NA, Golden WC, Escobar GJ, Massolo M, Klein NP.  Risk of fever and sepsis evaluations following routine immunizations in the neonatal intensive care unit.   J Perinatol . 2010 Sep;30(9):604-9.

Price CS, Thompson WW, Goodson B, Weintraub ES, Croen LA, Hinrichsen VL, et al.  Prenatal and infant exposure to thimerosal from vaccines and immunoglobulins and risk of autism .  Pediatrics . 2010 Oct;126(4):656-64.

Schmidt MA, Crane B, Mullooly JP, Naleway AL.  Frequency of medically attended events following rapid revaccination with trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine .  Vaccine . 2010 Nov;28(49):7713-5.

Smith MJ, Woods CR.  On-time vaccine receipt in the first year does not adversely affect neuropsychological outcomes.   Pediatrics . 2010 Jun;125(6):1134-41.

Sy LS, Liu IL, Solano Z, Cheetham TC, Lugg MM, Greene SK, et al.  Accuracy of influenza vaccination status in a computer-based immunization tracking system of a managed care organization.   Vaccine . 2010 Jul;28(32):5254-59.

Talbot EA, Brown KH, Kirkland KB, Baughman AL, Halperin SA, Broder KR.  The safety of immunizing with tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis vaccine (Tdap) less than 2 years following previous tetanus vaccination: Experience during a mass vaccination campaign of healthcare personnel during a respiratory illness outbreak.   Vaccine . 2010 Nov;28(50):8001-7.

Vellozzi C, Broder KR, Haber P, Guh A, Nguyen M, Cano M, et al.   Adverse events following influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccines reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, United States, October 1, 2009-January 31, 2010 .  Vaccine . 2010 Oct; (45):7248-55.

Wong C, Krashin J, Rue-Cover A, Saraiya M, Unger E, Calugar A, et al.  Invasive and in situ cervical cancer reported to the vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS).   J Womens Health (Larchmt) . 2010 Mar; 19(3):365-370.

Xu S, Gargiullo P, Mullooly J, McClure , Hambidge SJ, Glanz J. Fitting parametric and semi-parametric conditional Poisson regression models with cox’s partial likelihood in self-controlled case series and matched cohort studies. [PDF – 12 pages]   J Data Sci . 2010 Apr;8(2):349-60.

Zangwill KM, Yeh SH, Wong EJ, Marcy SM, Eriksen E, Huff KR, et al.  Paralytic syndromes in children: Epidemiology and relationship to vaccination.   Pediatr Neurol . 2010 Mar;42(3):206-12.

Batra J, Eriksen E, Zangwill K, Lee M, Marcy S, Ward J; Vaccine Safety Datalink.  Evaluation of vaccine coverage for low birth weight infants during the first year of life in a large managed care population.   Pediatrics . 2009 Mar;123(3):951-958.

Bonhoeffer J, Bentsi-Echnill, Chen R, Fisher M, Gold M, Hartman K, et al; Brighton Collaboration Methods Working Group.  Guidelines for collection, analysis, and presentation of vaccine safety data in pre- and post-licensure clinical studies .  Vaccine . 2009 Apr;27(16):2282-8

CDC.  Safety of influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccines—United States, October 1–November 24, 2009.   MMWR . 2009 Dec; 58(48):1351-1356.

Donahue JG, Kieke BA, Yih WK, Berger NR, McCauley JS, Baggs J, et al; Vaccine Safety Datalink.  Varicella vaccination and ischemic stroke in children: Is there an association?   Pediatrics . 2009 Feb;123(2)e228–34.

Durbin AP, Setse R, Omer SB, Palmer JG, Spaeder JA, Baker J, et al.  Monitoring adverse events following yellow fever vaccination using an integrated telephone and internet-based system .  Vaccine . 2009 Oct; 27(44):6143-47.

Fiore AE, Shay DK, Broder K, Iskander J, Uyeki TM, Mootrey G, et al. Prevention and control of seasonal influenza.   MMWR . 2009 Jul;58(RR-8):1-52.

Greene SK, Shi P, Dutta-Linn MM, Shoup JA, Hinrichsen VL, Ray P, et al.  Accuracy of data on influenza vaccination status at four Vaccine Safety Datalink sites.   Am J Prev Med . 2009 Dec;37(6):552-5.

Haber P, Sejvar J, Mikaeloff Y, DeStefano F.  Vaccines and Guillain-Barré syndrome.   Drug Saf . 2009;32(4):309-23.

Hazlehurst B, Naleway A, Mullooly J.  Detecting possible vaccine adverse events in clinical notes of the electronic medical record.   Vaccine . 2009 Mar;27(14):2077-83.

Hua W, Izurieta HS, Slade B, Belay ED, Haber P, Tiernan R, et al.  Kawasaki disease after vaccination: reports to the vaccine adverse event reporting system 1990-2007 .  Pediatr Infect Dis J.  2009;28(11):943-7.

Jackson LA, Yu Onchee, Nelson J, Belongia EA, Hambidge SJ, Baxter R, et al.  Risk of medically-attended local reactions following diphtheria toxoid containing vaccines in adolescents and young adults: A Vaccine Safety Datalink Study.   Vaccine . 2009 Aug;27(36):4912-6.

Jackson LA, Onchee Y, Belongia EA, Hambidge SJ, Nelson J, Baxter R, et al.  Frequency of medically attended adverse events following tetanus and diphtheria toxoid vaccine in adolescents and young adults: A Vaccine Safety Datalink study.   BMC Infect Dis . 2009 Oct;9:165.

Jackson LA, Baxter R, Naleway AL, Belongia EA, Baggs J.  Patterns of pneumococcal vaccination and revaccination in elderly and non-elderly adults: A Vaccine Safety Datalink study.   BMC Infect Dis . 2009 Mar;9:37.

Klein NP, Edwards KM, Sparks R, Dekker CL; Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) Network.  Recurrent sterile abscesses following immunization: A possible association with aluminum adjuvant.   BMJ Case Rep . 2009;2009.

Klein NP, Kissner J, Aguirre A, Sparks R, Campbell S, Edwards KM, et al.  Differential maternal responses to a newly developed vaccine information pamphlet.   Vaccine  2009; 28:323–8.

Naleway AL, Belongia EA, Donahue JG, Kieke BA, Glanz J; Vaccine Safety Datalink.  Risk of immune hemolytic anemia in children following immunization.   Vaccine . 2009 Dec;27(52):7394-7.

Nelson JC, Bittner RCL, Bounds L, Zhao S, Baggs J, Donahue JG, et al.  Compliance with multiple-dose vaccine schedules among older children, adolescents, and adults: results from a Vaccine Safety Datalink Study.   Am J Public Health . 2009 Oct;99 Suppl 2:S389-97.

Niu MT, Ball R, Woo EJ, Burwen DR, Knippen M, Braun MM; et al.  Adverse events after anthrax vaccination reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 1990-2007 .   Vaccine.  2009;27(2):290-7.

Patel MM, Haber P, Baggs J, Zuber P, Bines JE, Parashar UD.  Intussusception and rotavirus vaccination: a review of the available evidence .   Expert Rev Vaccines.  2009;8(11):1555-64.

Rosenberg M, Sparks R, McMahon A, Iskander J, Campbell JD, Edwards KM.  Serious adverse events rarely reported after trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV) in children 6–23 months of age.   Vaccine . 2009 Jul;27(32):4278-83.

Rue-Cover A, Iskander J, Lyn S, Burwen DR, Gargiullo P, Shadomy S, et al.  Death and serious illness following influenza vaccination: A multidisciplinary investigation.   Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf . 2009 Jun;18(6):504-11.

Shui IM, Shi P, Dutta-Linn MM, Weintraub ES, Hambidge SJ, Nordin JD, et al; Vaccine Safety Datalink.  Predictive value of seizure ICD-9 codes for vaccine safety research.   Vaccine . 2009 Aug;27(39):5307-12.

Slade BA, Leidel L, Vellozzi C, Woo EJ, Hua W, Sutherland A, et al.  Postlicensure safety surveillance for quadrivalent human papillomavirus recombinant vaccine.   JAMA . 2009 Aug;302(7):750-7.

Tate J, Curns A, Cortese M, Weintraub E, Hambidge S, Zangwill K, et al.  Burden of acute gastroenteritis hospitalizations and emergency department visits in U.S. children that is totally preventable by rotavirus vaccination: a probe study using the now-withdrawn RotaShield vaccine.   Pediatrics . 2009 Mar;123(3):744-9.

Tozzi AE, Bisiacchi P, Tarantino V, De Mei B, D’Elia L, Chariotti F, Salmaso S.  Neuropsychological performance 10 years after immunization in infancy with thimerosal-containing vaccines.   Pediatrics . 2009 Feb;123(2):475-82.

Vellozzi C, Burwen DR, Dobardzic A, Ball R, Walton K, Haber P.  Safety of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccines in adults: Background for pandemic influenza vaccine safety monitoring.   Vaccine . 2009 Mar;27(15):2114-20.

Wei F, Mullooly JP, Goodman M, McCarty MC, Hanson AM, Crane B, et al.  Identification and characteristics of vaccine refusers.   BMC Pediatr . 2009 Mar;9:18.

Yih WK, Nordin JD, Kulldorff M, Lewis E, Lieu TA, Shi P, et al.  An assessment of the safety of adolescent and adult tetanus–diphtheria–acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine, using active surveillance for adverse events in the Vaccine Safety Datalink.   Vaccine . 2009 Jul;27(32):4257-62.

Asatryan A, Pool V, Chen RT, Kohl KS, Davis RL, Iskander JK; VAERS team.  Live attenuated measles and mumps viral strain-containing vaccines and hearing loss: Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), United States, 1990–2003.   Vaccine . 2008 Feb 26;26(9):1166-72.

Benson PJ, Jackson LA, Rees TG, Dunn JB.  Changes in DT vaccine frequency and indications for use following introduction of DTaP vaccine. Hum Vaccin . 2008 May-Jun;4(3):234-7.

Broder KR, Cohn AC, Schwartz B, Klein JD, Fisher MM, Fishbein DB, et al; Working Group on Adolescent Prevention Priorities.  Adolescent immunizations and other clinical preventive services: A needle and a hook?   Pediatrics . 2008 Jan;121 Suppl 1:S25-34.

Chapman LE, Iskander JK, Chen RT, Neff J, Birkhead GS, Poland G, et al.  A process for sentinel case review to assess causal relationships between smallpox vaccination and adverse outcomes, 2003–2004.   Clin Infect Dis . 2008 Mar;46 Suppl 3:S271-93.

Chaves SS, Haber P, Walton K, Wise RP, Izurieta HS, Schmid DS, et al.  Safety of varicella vaccine after licensure in the United States: experience from reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, 1995–2005.   J Infect Dis . 2008 Mar 1;197 Suppl 2:S170-7.

Clayton HA, Cortese MM, Payne DC, Bartlett DL, Zimmerman LA, Williams WG, Wang M, Stockman LJ, Parashar U, Baggs J.  Rotavirus vaccination coverage and adherence to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP)-recommended vaccination schedule—United States, February 2006–May 2007.   MMWR . 2008 Apr;57(15):398-401.

Fishbein DB, Broder KR, Markowitz L, Messonnier N.  New, and some not-so-new, vaccines for adolescents and diseases they prevent. Pediatrics . 2008 Jan;121 Suppl 1:S5-14.

France EK, Glanz JM, Xu S, Hambidge S, Yamasaki K, Black SB, et al; Vaccine Safety Datalink.  Risk of immune thrombocytopenic purpura after measles-mumps-rubella immunization in children.   Pediatrics . 2008 Mar;121(3):e687-92.

Gidudu J, Kohl KS, Halperin S, Hammer SJ, Heath PT, Hennig R, et al; The Brighton Collaboration Local Reactions Working Group for A Local Reaction at or near Injection Site.  A local reaction at or near injection site: Case definition and guidelines for collection, analysis, and presentation of immunization safety data.   Vaccine . 2008 Dec;26(52):6800-13.

Glanz JM, France EK, Xu S, Hayes T, Hambidge S.  A population-based, multisite cohort study of the predictors of chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in children.   Pediatrics . 2008 Mar;121(3):e506-12.

Haber P, Patel M, Izurieta HS, Baggs J, Gargiullo P, Weintraub E, et al.  Postlicensure monitoring of intussusception after RotaTeq vaccination in the United States, February 1, 2006, to September 25, 2007.   Pediatrics . 2008 Jun;121(6):1206-12.

Halsey NA.  The Human Papillomavirus Vaccine and Risk of Anaphylaxis . [Commentary].  CMAJ . 2008 Sep 9;179(6):509-10. Erratum in: CMAJ. 2008 Sep 23; 179(7):678.

Harpaz R, Ortega-Sanchez IR, Seward JF; Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).  Prevention of herpes zoster: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).   MMWR . 2008 Jun;57(RR-5):1-30; quiz CE2-4.

Iskander J, Broder K.  Monitoring the safety of annual and pandemic influenza vaccines: lessons from the US experience.   Expert Rev Vaccines . 2008 Feb;7(1):75-82.

Iskander J, Gidudu J, Arboleda N, Huang WT.  Selected major issues in vaccine safety .  Ann Nestlé . 2008;66:93-102.

Klein NP, Massolo ML, Greene J, Dekker CL, Black S, Escobar GJ; Vaccine Safety Datalink.  Risk factors for developing apnea after immunization in the neonatal intensive care unit.   Pediatrics . 2008 Mar;121(3):463-9.

Kohl K, Magnus M, Ball R, Halsey N, Shadomy S, et al.  Applicability, Reliability, Sensitivity, and Specificity of Six Brighton Collaboration Standardized Case Definitions for Adverse Events Following Immunization .  Vaccine . 2008 Nov 25; 26(50):6349–60.

Leung J, Rue A, Lopez A, Ortega-Sanchez IR, Harpaz R, Guris D, et al.  Varicella outbreak reporting, response, management, and national surveillance.   J Infect Dis . 2008 Mar 1;197 Suppl 2:S108-13.

Lindsey NP, Schroeder BA, Miller ER, Braun MM, Hinckley AF, Marano N, et al.  Adverse event reports following yellow fever vaccination .  Vaccine.  2008;26(48):6077-82.

McClure DL, Glanz JM, Xu S, Hambidge SJ, Mullooly JP, Baggs J.  Comparison of epidemiologic methods for active surveillance of vaccine safety.   Vaccine . 2008 Jun;26(26):3341-5.

McMahon AW, Iskander JK, Haber P, Braun MM, Ball R.  Inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) in children < 2 years of age: Examination of selected adverse events reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) after thimerosal-free or thimerosal-containing vaccine. Vaccine . 2008 Jan;26(3):427-9.

Morgan J, Roper MH, Sperling L, Schieber RA, Heffelfinger JD, Casey CG, et al.  Myocarditis, pericarditis, and dilated cardiomyopathy after smallpox vaccination among civilians in the United States, January–October 2003.   Clin Infect Dis . 2008 Mar 15;46 Suppl 3:S242-50.

Nachamkin I, Shadomy SV, Moran AP, Cox N, Fitzgerald C, Ung H, et al.  Anti-ganglioside antibody induction by swine (A/NJ/1976/H1N1) and other influenza vaccines: Insights into vaccine-associated Guillain-Barre syndrome.   J Infect Dis . 2008 Jul 15;198(2):226-33.

Rennels M, Black S, Woo E, Campbell S, Edwards KM.  Safety of a fifth dose of diphtheria and tetanus toxoid and acellular pertussis vaccine in children experiencing extensive, local reactions to the fourth dose .  Pediatr Infect Dis J . 2008 May;27(5):464-5.

Sutherland A, Izurieta H, Ball R, Braun MM, Miller ER, Broder KR, et al; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.   Syncope after vaccination—United States, January 2005–July 2007.   MMWR . 2008 May;57(17):457-60.

Swerdlow DL, Roper MH, Morgan J, Schieber RA, Sperling LS, Sniadack MM, et al; Smallpox Vaccine Cardiac Adverse Events Working Group.  Ischemic cardiac events during the Department of Health and Human Services Smallpox Vaccination Program, 2003.   Clin Infect Dis . 2008 Mar 15;46 Suppl 3:S234-41.

Tatti KM, Slade BA, Patel M, Messonier NR, Jackson T, Kirkland K, et al.  Real-time polymerase chain reaction detection of Bordetella pertussis DNA in acellular pertussis vaccines.   Pediatr Infect Dis J . 2008 Jan;27(1):73-4.

Thomas TN, Reef S, Neff L, Sniadack MM, Mootrey GT.  A review of the smallpox vaccine adverse events active surveillance system.   Clin Infect Dis . 2008 Mar 15;46 Suppl 3:S212-20.

Wood RA, Berger M, Dreskin SC, Setse R, Engler RJM, Dekker CL, et al; Hypersensitivity Working Group of the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment (CISA) Network.  An algorithm for treatment of patients with hypersensitivity reactions after vaccines.   Pediatrics . 2008 Sep;122(3):e771-7.

Beigel J, Kohl KS, Brinley F, Graham PL, Khuri-Bulos N, LaRussa PS, et al.  Generalized vaccinia as an adverse event following exposure to vaccinia virus: Case definition and guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of immunization safety data.  Vaccine. 2007;25(31):5745–5753.

Beigel J, Kohl KS, Khuri-Bulos N, Bravo L, Nell P, Marcy SM, et al.  Rash including mucosal involvement: Case definition and guidelines for collection, analysis, and presentation of immunization safety data.  Vaccine. 2007;25(31):5697–5706.

Belongia E, Izurieta H, Braun MM, Ball R, Haber P, Baggs J, et al.  Postmarketing monitoring of intussusception after RotaTeq vaccination – United States, February 1, 2006-February 15, 2007 . MMWR. 2007 Mar 16;56(10):218-22.

Buettcher M, Baer G, Bonhoeffer J, Schaad UB, Heininger U.  Three-year surveillance of intussusception in children in Switzerland. Pediatrics.  2007;120(3):473–480.

Buettcher M, Heininger U, Braun M, Bonhoeffer J, Halperin S, Heijbel H, et al.  Hypotonic-hyporesponsive episode (HHE) as an adverse event following immunization in early childhood: Case definition and guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation. Vaccine. 2007;25(31):5875–5881.

DeStefano F, Weintraub ES, Chen RT.  Hepatitis B vaccine and risk of multiple sclerosis  [letter].  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf.  2007 Jun;16(6):705-7, author reply 707-8.

Fiore AE, Shay DK, Haber P, Iskander JK, Uyeki TM, Mootrey G, et al.  Prevention and control of influenza. Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), 2007 .   MMWR Recomm Rep.  2007 Jul 13; 56(RR-6):1-54.

Graham PL, LaRussa PS, Kohl KS; Brighton Collaboration Vaccinia Virus Adverse Event Working Group for Robust Take.  Robust take following exposure to vaccinia virus: Case definition and guidelines of data collection, analysis, and presentation of immunization safety data. Vaccine.  2007 Aug 1;25(31):5763-70.

Haber MJ, Shay DK, Davis XM, Patel R, Jin X, Weintraub E, et al.  Effectiveness of interventions to reduce contact rates during a simulated influenza pandemic.  Emerg Infect Dis. 2007 Apr;13(4):581-9.

Haber P, Slade B, Iskander J.  Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) after vaccination reported to the United States Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) in 2004 [Letter] . Vaccine. 2007;25(48):8101.

Halperin S, Kohl KS, Gidudu J, Ball L, Hammer SJ, Heath P, et al.  Cellulitis at injection site: Case definition and guidelines for collection, analysis, and presentation of immunization safety data.  Vaccine. 2007;25(31):5803–5820.

Hirichsen V, Kruskal B, O’Brien MA, Lieu TA, Platt R; Vaccine Safety Datalink Team.  Using electronic medical records to enhance detection and reporting of vaccine adverse events.   J Am Med Inform Assoc.  2007 Nov-Dec;14(6):731-5.

Jackson LA, Neuzil KM, Nahm MH, Whitney CG, Yu O, Nelson JC, et al.  Immunogenicity of varying dosages of 7-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide-protein conjugate vaccine in seniors previously vaccinated with 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine. Vaccine.  2007;25(20):4029–4037.

Jackson ML, Nelson JC, Chen RT, Davis RL, Jackson LA; Vaccine Safety Datalink team.  Vaccines and changes in coagulation parameters in adults on chronic warfarin therapy: a cohort study.   Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf.  2007 Jul;16(7):790-6.

Jones JF, Kohl KS, Ahmadipour N, Bleijenberg G, Buchwald D, Evengard B, et al.  Fatigue: Case definition and guidelines for collection, analysis, and presentation of immunization safety data.   Vaccine.  2007;25(31):5685–5696.

Jorch G, Tapiainen T, Bonhoeffer J, Fischer TK, Heininger U, Hoet B, et al.  Unexplained sudden death, including sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS), in the first and second years of life: Case definition and guidelines for collection, analysis, and presentation of immunization safety data.   Vaccine.  2007;25(31):5707–5716.

Klein NP, Fireman B, Enright A, Ray P, Black S, Dekker CL; Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment Network.  A role for genetics in the immune response to the varicella vaccine.   Pediatr Infect Dis J.  2007 Apr;26(4):300-5.

Kohl KS, Ball L, Gidudu J, Hammer SJ, Halperin S, Heath P, et al.  Abscess at injection site: Case definition and guidelines for collection, analysis, and presentation of immunization safety data.   Vaccine.  2007;25(31):5821–5838.

Kohl KS, Gidudu J, Bonhoeffer J, Braun MM, Buettcher M, Chen RT, et al.  The development of standardized case definitions and guidelines for adverse events following immunization.   Vaccine.  2007;25(31):5671–5674.

Kohl KS, Walop W, Gidudu J, Ball L, Halperin S, Hammer SJ, et al.  Induration at or near injection site: Case definition and guidelines for collection, analysis, and presentation of immunization safety data.   Vaccine.  2007;25(31):5839–5857.

Kohl KS, Walop W, Gidudu J, Ball L, Halperin S, Hammer SJ, et al.  Swelling at or near injection site: Case definition and guidelines for collection, analysis and presentation of immunization safety data.   Vaccine.  2007;25(31):5858–5874.

Lieu TA, Kulldorff M, Davis RL, Lewis EM, Weintraub E, Yih K, et al.  Real-time vaccine safety surveillance for the early detection of adverse events.   Med Care.  2007 Oct;45(10 Supl 2):S89-95.

McNeil MM, Ma GW, Aranas A, Payne DC, Rose CE Jr.  A comparative assessment of immunization records in the Defense Medical Surveillance System and the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System .  Vaccine . 2007 Apr 30;25(17):3428-36.

Miller ER, Iskander J, Pickering S, Varricchio F.  How can you promote vaccine safety?   Nursing.  2007;37(4):58–63.

Molinari NA, Ortega-Sanchez IR, Messonnier ML, Thompson WW, Wortley PM, Weintraub E, et al.  The annual impact of seasonal influenza in the US: measuring disease burden and costs.   Vaccine.  2007 Jun 28;25(27):5086-96.

Mullooly JP, Bridges CB, Thompson WW, Chen J, Weintraub E, Jackson LA, et al.  Influenza- and RSV-associated hospitalizations among adults.   Vaccine.  2007 Jan 15;25(5):846-55.

Mullooly JP, Schuler R, Barrett M, Maher JE.  Vaccines, antibiotics, and atopy.   Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf.  2007 Mar;16(3):275-88.

Nell P, Kohl KS, Graham PL, LaRussa PS, Marcy SM, Fulginiti VA, et al.  Progressive vaccinia as an adverse event following exposure to vaccinia virus: Case definition and guidelines of data collection, analysis, and presentation of immunization safety data.   Vaccine.  2007;25(31):5735–5744.

Nell P, Kohl KS, Graham PL, LaRussa PS, Marcy SM, Fulginiti VA, et al.  Eczema vaccinatum as an adverse event following exposure to vaccinia virus: case definition & guidelines of data collection, analysis, and presentation of immunization safety data.  Vaccine. 2007;25(31):5725–5734.

Payne DC, Aranas A, McNeil MM, Duderstadt S, and Rose Jr. CE.  Concurrent vaccinations and U.S. military hospitalizations . Ann. Epidemiol. 2007 Sep;17(9):697-703.

Payne DC, Franzke LH, Stehr-Green PA, Schwartz B, and McNeil MM.  Development of the Vaccine Analytic Unit’s research agenda for investigating potential adverse events associated with anthrax vaccine adsorbed . Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007 Jan;16(1):46-54.

Payne DC, Rose Jr. CE, Aranas A, Zhang Y, Tolentino H, Weston E, et al.  Assessment of anthrax vaccination data in the Defense Medical Surveillance System, 1998-2004 .  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf.  2007 Jun;16(6):605-11.

Rüggeberg JU, Gold MS, Bayas JM, Blum MD, Bonhoeffer J, Friedlander S, et al.  Anaphylaxis: Case definition and guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of immunization safety data.   Vaccine.  2007;25(31):5675–5684.

Sejvar JJ, Kohl KS, Bilynsky R, Blumberg D, Cvetkovich T, Galama J, et al.  Encephalitis, myelitis, and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM): Case definitions and guidelines for collection, analysis, and presentation of immunization safety data.   Vaccine.  2007 Aug 1;25(31):5771-92

Tapiainen T, Prevots R, Izurieta HS, Abramson J, Bilynsky R, Bo nhoeffer J, et al.  Aseptic meningitis: Case definition and guidelines for collection, analysis and presentation of immunization safety data.   Vaccine.  2007 Aug 1;25(31):5793-802.

Thompson WW, Price C, Goodson B, Shay DK, Benson P, Hinrichsen VL, et al.  Early thimerosal exposure and neuropsychological outcomes at 7 to 10 years.   N Engl J Med.  2007 Sep 27;357(13):1281-92.

Tolentino HD, Matters MD, Walop W, Law B, Tong W, Liu F, Fontelo P, Kohl K, and Payne DC.  A UMLS-based spell checker for natural language processing in vaccine safety 2007; 7: 3.

Wenger P, Oleske JM, Kohl KS, Fisher MC, Brien JH, Graham PL, et al.  Inadvertent inoculation as an adverse event following exposure to vaccinia virus: Case definition and guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation of immunization safety data.   Vaccine. 2007;25(31):5754–5762.

Wise RP, Bonhoeffer J, Beeler J, Donato H, Downie P, Matthews D, et al.  Thrombocytopenia: Case definition and guidelines for collection, analysis, and presentation of immunization safety data.   Vaccine.  2007 Aug 1;25(31):5717-24.

Woo EJ, Ball R, Landa R, Zimmerman AW, Braun MM; VAERS Working Group.  Developmental regression and autism reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System ,  Autism. . 2007; 11(4):301-10.

Wood R, Setse R, Halsey NA; Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment Network Hypersensitivity Working Group.  Irritant skin test reactions to common vaccines.   J Allergy Clin Immunol.  2007 Aug;120(2):478-81.

Yu O, Bohlke K, Hanson CA, Delaney K, Rees TG, Zavitkovsky A, et al.  Hepatitis B vaccine and risk of autoimmune thyroid disease: A Vaccine Safety Datalink study .  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf.  2007 Jul;16(7):736-45.

Bines JE, Liem NT, Justice F, Son TN, Carlin JB, de Campo M, et al.  Validation of a clinical case definition for acute intussusception in infants in Vietnam and Australia.   Bull World Health Organ.  2006 Jul;84(7):569-75.

Broder KR, Cortese MM, Iskander JK, Kretsinger K, Slade BA, Brown KH, et al.  Preventing tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis among adolescents: Use of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis vaccines recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) .   MMWR Recomm Rep.  2006 Mar 24; 55(RR-3):1-34.

CDC.  Update: Guillain-Barré syndrome among recipients of Menactra meningococcal conjugate vaccine—United States, October 2005–February 2006.   MMWR.  2006;55(13):364–366.

DiMiceli L, Pool V, Kelso JM, Shadomy SV, Iskander J; VAERS Team.  Vaccination of yeast sensitive individuals: Review of safety data in the US vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS).   Vaccine.  2006;24(6):703–707.

Fowler GL, Baggs JM, Weintraub ES, Martin SW, McNeil MM, Gust DA.  Factors influencing laboratory workers’ decisions to accept or decline anthrax vaccine adsorbed (AVA): Results of a Ddcision-making study in CDC’s anthrax vaccination program .  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2006 Dec;15(12):880-8.

France EK, Smith-Ray R, McClure D, Hambidge S, Xu S, Yamasaki K, et al.  Impact of maternal influenza vaccination during pregnancy on the incidence of acute respiratory illness visits among infants.   Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med.  2006 Dec;160(12):1277-83.

Glanz JM, McClure DL, Xu S, Hambidge SJ, Lee M, Kolczak MS, et al.  Four different study designs to evaluate vaccine safety were equally validated with contrasting limitations.   J Clin Epidemiol.  2006 Aug;59(8):808-18.

Hambidge SJ, Glanz JM, France EK, McClure D, Xu S, Yamasaki K, et al.  Safety of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in children 6 to 23 months old.   JAMA.  2006 Oct 25;296(16):1990-7.

Iskander J, Pool V, Zhou W, English-Bullard R; VAERS Team.  Data mining in the US using the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System.   Drug Saf.  2006;29(5):375-84.

Jackson LA, Nelson JC, Whitney CG, Neuzil KM, Benson P, Malais D, et al.  Assessment of the safety of a third dose of pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine in the Vaccine Safety Datalink population.   Vaccine.  2006;24(2):151–156.

Jackson LA, Neuzil KM, Baggs J, Davis RL, Black S, Yamasaki KM, et al.  Compliance with the recommendations for 2 doses of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in children less than 9 years of age receiving influenza vaccine for the first time: A Vaccine Safety Datalink study.   Pediatrics.  2006;118(5):2032–2037.

Lin ND, Kleinman K, Chan KA, Yu XJ, France EK, Wei F, et al.  Variation in hepatitis B immunization coverage rates associated with provider practices after the temporary suspension of the birth dose.   BMC Pediatr.  2006 Nov 13;6:31.

Miller ER, Woo EJ.  Time to prevent injuries from postimmunization syncope .   Nursing.  2006; 36(12 Pt.1):20.

Muralles AA, Ray P, Black S, Shinefield H, Casey CG, Campbell S, et al.  Active telephone surveillance to evaluate adverse events among civilian smallpox vaccine recipients.   Vaccine.  2006;24(4):476–484.

Payne DC, Rose CE Jr, Kerrison J, Aranas A, Duderstadt S, McNeil MM.  Anthrax vaccination and risk of optic neuritis in the United States military, 1998-2003 .  Arch. Neurology  2006;63:871-875.

Prosser LA, Bridges CB, Uyeki TM, Hinrichsen VL, Meltzer MI, Noelle-Angelique MM, et al.  Health benefits, risks, and cost-effectiveness of influenza vaccination of children.   Emerg Infect Dis.  2006 Oct;12(10):1548-58.

Ray P, Hayward J, Michelson D, Lewis E, Schwalbe J, Black S, et al.  Encephalopathy after whole-cell pertussis or measles vaccination: Lack of evidence for a causal association in a retrospective case-control study.   Pediatr Infect Dis J.  2006 Sep;25(9):768-73.

Sekaran N, Edwards, K.  Extensive swelling reaction associated with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and acellular pertussis vaccine .  Pediatr Infect Dis J . 2006 Apr; 25(4):374-5.

Tapiainen T, Bär G, Bonhoeffer J, Heininger U.  Evaluation of The Brighton Collaboration case definition of acute intussusception during active surveillance.   Vaccine.  2006 Feb 27;24(9):1483-7.

Varricchio F, Reed J; VAERS Working Group.  Follow-up study of medication errors reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).   South Med J.  2006 May;99(5):486-9.

Vellozzi C, Mitchell T, Miller E, Casey CG, Eidex RB, Hayes EB.  Yellow fever vaccine-associated viscerotropic disease (YEL-AVD) and corticosteroid therapy: Eleven United States cases, 1996-2004 .   Am J Trop Med Hyg . 2006 Aug;75(2):333-6.

Vermeer-de Bondt PE, Dzaferagić A, David S, van der Maas NA.  Performance of The Brighton Collaboration case definition for hypotonic–hyporesponsive episode (HHE) on reported collapse reactions following infant vaccinations in the Netherlands.   Vaccine.  2006 Nov 30;24(49-50):7066-70.

Woo EJ, Ball R, Braun M, Clark T, Rosenstein Messonnier N, Wharton M, et al.  Update: Guillain-Barré syndrome among recipients of Menactra meningococcal conjugate vaccine—United States, June 2005–September 2006 . MMWR.  2006 Oct 20;55(41):1120-4.

Woo EJ, Ball R, Landa R, Zimmerman AW, Braun MM; VAERS Working Group.  Developmental regression and autism reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System.  Autism. 2007 Jul;11(4):301-10.

Woo EJ, Miller NB, Ball R; VAERS Working Group.  Adverse events after hepatitis A B combination vaccine.   Vaccine.  2006;24(14):2685–2691.

Baggs J, Chen R, Damon I, Rotz L, Allen C, Fullerton K, et al.  Safety profile of smallpox vaccine: Insights from the pre-event smallpox vaccination program .  Clin Infect Dis.  2005;40(8):1133-40.

Belongia EA, Naleway A, Kieke B, Qutaishat S, Casey C, Shay DK, et al.  Validation of a screening instrument to identify persons for exclusion from smallpox vaccination .  Clin Infect Dis.  2005 Feb 15;40(4):620-3.

Bloom S, Rguig A, Berraho A, Zniber L, Bouazzaoui N, Zaghloul Z, et al.  Congenital rubella syndrome burden in Morocco: a rapid retrospective assessment .  Lancet.  2005 Jan 8;365(9454):135-41.

Casey CG, Iskander JK, Roper MH, Mast EE, Wen XJ, Tӧrӧk TJ, et al. Adverse events associated with smallpox vaccination in the United States, January-October 2003 .   JAMA.  2005 Dec 7;294(21):2734-43.

CDC.  Guillain-Barré syndrome among recipients of Menactra® meningococcal conjugate vaccine—United States, June–July 2005 .  MMWR Dispatch.  2005;54:1-3.

Davis RL, Kolczak M, Lewis E, Nordin J, Goodman M, Shay DK, et al.  Active surveillance of vaccine safety: a system to detect early signs of adverse events .  Epidemiology.  2005 May;16(3):336-41.

DeStefano F, Weintraub ES, Chen RT.  Recombinant hepatitis B vaccine and the risk of multiple sclerosis: a prospective study [letter] .  Neurology.  2005 Apr 12;64(7):1317; author reply 1318.

Gust D, Brown C, Sheedy K, Hibbs B, Weaver D, Nowak G.  Immunization attitudes and beliefs among parents: Beyond a dichotomous perspective .  Am J Health Behav.  2005 Jan-Feb;29(1):81-92.

Gust DA, Kennedy A, Shui I, Smith PJ, Nowak G, Pickering LK.  Parent Attitudes Toward Immunizations and Healthcare Providers: The Role of Information .  Am J Preventive Health.  2005 Aug;29(2):105-12.

Iskander J, Haber P, Herrera G.  Monitoring vaccine safety during an influenza pandemic .  Yale J Biol Med.  2005; 78(5):265-75.

Izurieta HS, Haber P, Wise RP, Iskander J, Pratt D, Mink C, et al.  Adverse events reported following live, cold-adapted, intranasal influenza vaccine .  JAMA . 2005 Dec 7;294(21):2720-5.

Jackson LA, Neuzil KM, Whitney CG, Starkovich P, Dunstan M, Yu O, et al.  Safety of varying dosages of 7-valent pneumococcal protein conjugate vaccine in seniors previously vaccinated with 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine .  Vaccine.  2005;23(28):3697-703.

Kennedy A, Brown C, Gust D.  Vaccine beliefs of parents who oppose compulsory vaccination .  Public Health Rep.  2005 May-Jun; 120(3): 252–258.

Kennedy A, Gust D.  Parental vaccine beliefs and child’s school type .  J Sch Health.  2005 Sep;75(7):276-80.

Khromava AY, Eidex RB, Weld LH, Kohl KS, Bradshaw RD, Chen RT, et al.  Yellow fever vaccine: an updated assessment of advanced age as a risk factor for serious adverse events .  Vaccine.  2005 May 9;23(25):3256-63.

Kohl KS, Bonhoeffer J, Braun MM, Chen RT, Duclos P, Heijbel H, et al.  The Brighton Collaboration: Creating a global standard for case definitions (and guidelines) for adverse events following immunization . In Advances in Patient Safety: From Research to Implementation. Henriksen K, Battles JB, Marks ES, et al., eds. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2005 Feb.

Martin SW, Tierney BC, Aranas A, Rosenstein NE, Franzke LH, Apicella L, et al.  An overview of adverse events reported by participants in CDC’s anthrax vaccine and antimicrobial availability program. .  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf.  2005 Jun;14(6):393-401.

McMahon AW, Iskander J, Haber P, Chang S, Woo EJ, Braun MM, etc.  Adverse events after inactivated influenza vaccination among children less than 2 years of age: analysis of reports from the vaccine adverse event reporting system, 1990-2003 .   Pediatrics.  2005;115(2):453-60.

Lewis N, Black S, Weintraub E, Baggs J, Thompson W, DeStefano F, et al.  Rapid assessment of influenza vaccination coverage among HMO members—Northern California influenza seasons, 2001–02 through 2004–05 .  MMWR.  2005;54(27):676-678.

Mandell DS, Thompson WW, Weintraub ES, DeStefano F, Blank MB.  Trends in diagnosis rates for autism and ADHD at hospital discharge in the context of other psychiatric diagnoses .  Psychiatr Serv.  2005 Jan;56(1):56-62.

McMahon AW, Iskander J, Haber P, Chang S, Woo EJ, Braun MM, et al.  Adverse events after inactivated influenza vaccination among children less than 2 years of age: analysis of reports from the vaccine adverse event reporting system, 1990-2003 .  Pediatrics.  2005;115(2):453-60.

Papania MJ, Strebel PM.   Measles surveillance: the importance of finding the tip of the iceberg [commentary] .  Lancet.  2005 Jan 8;365(9454):100-1.

Rollison D, Helzlsouer K, Halsey N, Shah K, and Viscidi R.  Markers of past infection with simian virus 40 (SV40) and risk of incident non-Hodgkin lymphoma in a Maryland cohort .  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev . 2005 June; 14(6) 1448-1452.

Sejvar J, Boneva R, Lane JM, Iskander J.  Severe headaches following smallpox vaccination .  Headache.  2005 Jan;45(1):87-8.

Sejvar JJ, Labutta RJ, Chapman LE, Grabenstein JD, Iskander J, Lane JM.  Neurologic adverse events associated with smallpox vaccination in the United States, 2002-2004 .  JAMA.  2005 Dec 7;294(21):2744-50.

Shui I, Kennedy A, Wooten K, Schwartz B, Gust D.  Factors influencing African American mothers’ concerns about immunization safety: A summary of focus group findings in Atlanta .  J Natl Med Assoc.  2005 May;97(5):657-66.

Vellozzi CJ, Lane MJ, Averhoff F, Mauer T, Norton S, Damon I, Casey C.  Generalized vaccinia, progressive vaccinia andeczema vaccinatum are rare following smallpox vaccination: United States Surveillance, 2003 .  Clin Infect Dis.  2005 Sep 1;41(5):689-97. Epub 2005 Jul 26.

Verstraeten T, Davis R, Destefano F.  Immunity to tetanus is protective against the development of multiple sclerosis .  Med Hypotheses . 2005;65(5):966-9.

Yeung LF, Lurie P, Dayan G, Eduardo E, Britz PH, Redd SB, et al.  A limited measles outbreak in a highly vaccinated US boarding school .  Pediatrics.  2005 Dec;116(6):1287-91.

Begier EM, Burwen DR, Haber P, Ball R; Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System Working Group.  Postmarketing safety surveillance for typhoid fever vaccines from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, July 1990 through June 2002 .  Clin Infect Dis . 2004;38(6):771-9.

Begier EM, Langford CA, Sneller MC, Wise RP, Ball R; VAERS Working Group.  Polyarteritis nodosa reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS): Implications for assessment of suspected vaccine-provoked vasculitis .  J Rheumatol.  2004;31(11):2181-8.

Bines JE, Kohl KS, Forster J, Zanardi LR, Davis RL, Hansen J, et al.  Acute intussusception in infants and children as an adverse event following immunization: Case definition and guidelines of data collection, analysis, and presentation .  Vaccine.  2004 Jan 26;22(5-6):569-74.

Bonhoeffer J, Kohl KS, Chen RT, Duclos P, Heijbel H, Heininger U, et al.  Standardized case definitions of adverse events following immunization (AEFI) .  Vaccine.  2004 Jan 26;22(5-6):547-50.

Bonhoeffer J, Vermeer P, Halperin S, Kempe A, Music S, Shindman J, et al.  Persistent crying in infants and children as an adverse event following immunization: Case definition and guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation .  Vaccine . 2004 Jan 26;22(5-6):586-91.

Bonhoeffer J, Gold MS, Heijbel H, Vermeer P, Blumberg D, Braun M, et al.  Hypotonic-Hyporesponsive Episode (HHE) as an adverse event following immunization: Case definition and guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation .  Vaccine.  2004 Jan 26;22(5-6):563-8.

Bonhoeffer J, Menkes J, Gold MS, de Souza-Brito G, Fisher MC, Halsey N, et al.  Generalized convulsive seizure as an adverse event following immunization: Case definition and guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation .  Vaccine . 2004 Jan 26;22(5-6):557-62.

Chen R.  Evaluation of vaccine safety after the events of 11 September 2001: Role of cohort and case-control studies .  Vaccine . 2004 May 7;22(15-16):2047-53.

Freed GL, Clark SJ, Hibbs BH, Santoli JM.  Parental vaccine safety concerns. The experience of pediatricians and family physicians .  Am J Prev Med . 2004 Jan;26(1):11-4.

Haber P, Zanardi LR, Chen RT, Mootrey GT, Pless R,  English R, et al.  An analysis of rotavirus vaccine reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System: More than intussusception alone?    Pediatrics.  2004 Apr;113(4):e353-9.

Haber P, DeStefano F, Angulo FJ, Iskander J, Shadomy SV, Weintraub E, et al.  Guillain-Barré syndrome following influenza vaccination .  JAMA . 2004 Nov 24;292(20):2478-81

Iskander JK, Miller ER, Chen RT.  The role of the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting system (VAERS) in monitoring vaccine safety .  Pediatr Ann.  2004;33(9):599-606.

Kohl KS, Marcy SM, Blum M, Connell Jones M, Dagan R, et al.  Fever After Immunization: Current concepts and improved future scientific understanding .  Clin Infect Dis . 2004 Aug 1;39(3):389-94.

Marcy SM, Kohl KS, Dagan R, Nalin D, Blum M, Connell Jones M, et al.  Fever as an adverse event following immunization: Case definition and guidelines of data collection, analysis, and presentation .  Vaccine . 2004 Jan 26;22(5-6):551-6.

Muetsch M, Zhou W, Rhodes P, Bopp M, Chen RT, Linder T, et al.  Inactivated intranasal influenza vaccine and the risk of Bell’s Palsy in Switzerland .  N Engl J Med . 2004 Feb 26;350(9):896-903.

O’Brien MA, Uyeki TM, Shay DK, Thompson WW, Kleinman K, McAdam A, et al.  Incidence of outpatient visits and hospitalizations related to influenza in infants and young children .  Pediatrics.  2004 Mar;113(3 Pt 1):585-93.

Rothstein E, Kohl KS, Ball L, Halperin SA, Halsey N, Hammer SJ, et al.  Nodule at injection site as an adverse event following immunization: Case definition and guidelines for data collection, analysis, and presentation .  Vaccine.  2004 Jan 26;22(5-6):575-85.

Steinberg EB, Bishop R, Haber P, Dempsey AF, Hoekstra RM, Nelson JM, et al.  Typhoid fever in travelers: Who should be targeted for prevention?   Clin Infect Dis . 2004 Jul 15;39(2):186-91. Epub 2004 Jul 1.

Varricchio F, Iskander J, DeStefano F, Ball R, Pless R, Braun MM, et al.  Understanding vaccine safety: Information from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System .  Pediatr Infect Dis J . 2004 Apr;23(4):287-94.

Wise RP, Iskander J, Pratt RD, Campbell S, Ball R, Pless RP, et al.  Postlicensure safety surveillance for 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine .  JAMA.  2004;292(14):1702-10.

Zhou WG, Pool V, Destefano F, Iskander JK, Haber P, Chen RT, and The VAERS Working Group.   A potential signal of Bell’s palsy after parenteral inactivated influenza vaccines: Reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) – United States, 1991-2001 .  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf . 2004 Aug;13(8):505-10.

Bohlke K, Davis RL, Marcy SM, Braun MM, DeStefano F, et al.  The risk of anaphylaxis following vaccination of children and adolescents .  Pediatrics . 2003;112:815-20.

CDC.  Update: Multistate outbreak of monkeypox- Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Missouri, Ohio, and Wisconsin, 2003 .  MMWR.  2003;52:642-646.

Chen RT, Lane JM.  Myocarditis: The unexpected return of smallpox vaccine adverse events .  Lancet . 2003 Oct 25;362(9393):1345-6.

Cono J, Casey CG, Bell DM.  Smallpox vaccination and adverse reactions: Guidance for clinicians .  MMWR.  2003;52(No. RR-4):1-28.

DeStefano F, VerstraetenT, Jackson LA, Okoro CA, Benson P, Black SB, et al.  Vaccinations and risk of central nervous system demyelinating diseases in adults .  Arch Neurol . 2003;60:504-9.

DeStefano F, Verstraeten T, Chen RT.  Hepatitis B vaccine and risk of multiple sclerosis .  Expert Rev of Vaccines . 2003;2(1):21-29.

Gust DA, Woodruff R, Kennedy A, Brown C, Sheedy K, Hibbs B.  Parental perceptions surrounding risks and benefits of immunizations .  Semin Pediatr Infect Dis . 2003 Jul;14(3):207-12.

Haber P, DeStefano F.  Influenza vaccination and Guillain Barré syndrome .  Clin Immunol . 2003; 109(3):359; author reply 360-1.

Hutwagner L, Thompson WW, Seeman GM, Treadwell T.  The bioterrorism preparedness and response Early Aberration Reporting System (EARS) .  J Urban Health . 2003 Jun;80(2 Suppl 1):i89-96.

Jackson LA, Neuzil KM, Onchee Y, Benson P, Barlow WE, Adams AL, et al.  Effectiveness of pneumococcalpolysaccharide vaccine in older adults .  N Engl J Med . 2003 May 1;348(18):1747-55.

Jacobson SH, Sewell EC, Allwine DA, Medina EA, Weniger BG.  Designing pediatric vaccine formularies and pricing pediatric combination vaccines using operations research models and algorithms .   Expert Rev Vaccines . 2003 Feb;2(1):15-9.

Kelly WN.  The quality of published adverse drug event reports .  Ann Pharmacother . 2003:37(12):1774-1778.

Kohl K, Bonhoeffer J, Chen R, Duclos P, Heijbel H, Heininger U, et al.   The Brighton Collaboration: Enhancing comparability of vaccine safety data .  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf . 2003 Jun;12(4):335-40.

Lloyd JC, Haber P, Mootrey GT, Braun MM, Chen RT, and VAERS Working Group.  Adverse event reporting rates following tetanus-diphtheria and tetanus toxoid vaccinations: Data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 1991-1997 .  Vaccine . 2003 Sep 8;21(25-26):3746-50.

Mell L, Davis RL, Mullooly JP, Black SB, Shinefield HR, Zangwill KM, et al.  Polio extra-immunization in children less than two years old following changes in immunization recommendation [PDF – 650 KB] .  Pediatrics.  2003;111:296–301.

Naleway AL, Belongia EA, Greenlee, RT, Kieke BA, Chen RT, Shay DK.  Eczematous skin disease and recall of past diagnoses: Implications for smallpox vaccination .  Ann Int Med . 2003 Jul 1;139(1):1-7.

Tierney BC, Martin SW, Franzke LH, Marano N, Reissman DB, Louchart RD, et al.  Serious adverse events among participants in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Anthrax Vaccine and Antimicrobial Availability Program for persons at risk for bioterrorism-related inhalational anthrax .  Clin Infect Dis.  2003;37:905-911.

Thompson WW, Shay D, Weintraub E, Brammer L, Cox N, Anderson L, et al.  Mortality associated with influenza and respiratory syncytial virus in the United States .  JAMA.  2003;289:179-186.

Verstraeten T, Davis RL, DeStefano F, Lieu TA, Rhodes PH, Black SB, et al.  Safety of thimerosal-containing vaccines: A two-phased study of computerized health maintenance organization databases .  Pediatrics  2003;112:1039-48.

Verstraeten T, DeStefano F, Chen RT, Miller E.  Vaccine safety surveillance using large linked databases: Opportunities, hazards and proposed guidelines .  Expert Rev Vaccines . 2003 Feb;2(1):21-9.

Verstraeten T, Jumaan AO,  Mullooly JP, Seward JF, Izurieta HS, DeStefano F, et al.  A retrospective cohort study of the association of varicella vaccine failure with asthma, steroid use, age at vaccination, and measles-mumps-rubella vaccination .  Pediatrics . 2003 Aug;112(2):e98-103.

Wharton M, Strikas RA, Harpaz R, Rotz LD, Schwartz B, Casey CG, et al.  Recommendations for using smallpox vaccine in a pre-event vaccination program: Supplemental recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC) .  MMWR.  2003;52(No. RR-7):1-16.

Yih WK, Lieu TA, Rêgo VH, O’Brien MA, Shay DK, Yokoe DS, et al.  Attitudes of healthcare workers in U.S. hospitals regarding smallpox vaccination .  BMC Public Health.  2003, 3:20

Zhou W, Pool V, Iskander JK, English-Bullard R, Ball R, Wise RP.  Surveillance for safety after immunization: Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)— United States, 1991–2001 .  MMWR . 2003;52:(SS-1):1-24.

Atkinson WL, Pickering LK, Schwartz B, Weniger BG, Iskander JK.  General recommendations on immunization: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) [sections on jet injection and occupational safety regulations].   MMWR.  2002;51(RR-2):12-13,15.

Black S, Lewis E, Shinefield H, Fireman B, Ray P, et al.  Lack of association between receipt of conjugate Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine (HBOC) in infancy and risk of type 1 (juvenile onset) diabetes: Long term follow up of the HBOC efficacy trial cohort .  Pediatr Infect Dis J . 2002 Jun;21(6):568-9.

Bonhoeffer J, Kohl K, Chen R, Duclos P, Heijbel H, et al.   The Brighton Collaboration: Addressing the need for standardized case definitions of adverse events following immunization (AEFI) .  Vaccine.  2002 Dec 13;21(3-4):298-302.

CDC.  Adverse events associated with 17D-derived yellow fever vaccination—United States, 2001–2002 .  MMWR  2002;51:989-993.

Cetron MS, Marfin AA, Julian KG, Gubler DJ, Sharp DJ, et al.  Yellow fever vaccine: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) .  MMWR.  2002;51(RR-17):1-10.

Chang EJ, Zangwill KM, Lee H, Ward JI.  Lack of association between rotavirus infection and intussusception: Implications for use of attenuated rotavirus vaccines .  Pediatr Infect Dis J.  2002 Feb;21(2):97-102.

DeStefano F, Gu D, Kramarz P, Truman BI, Iademarco BF, et al.  Childhood vaccinations and risk of asthma .  Pediatr Infect Dis J.  2002 Jun;21(6):498-504.

Ekwueme DU, Weniger BG, Chen RT.  Model-based estimates of the risks of disease transmission and economic costs of seven injection devices in sub-Saharan Africa .  Bull World Health Organ.  2002; 80(11): 859–870.

Gonzalez IM, Averhoff FM, Massoudi MS, et al.  Hepatitis b vaccination among adolescents in 3 large health maintenance organizations .  Pediatrics.  2002 Nov;110(5):929-34.

Halsey NA.   The science of evaluation of adverse effects associated with vaccination .  Semin Pediatr Infect Dis.  2002 Jul;13(3):205-14.

Halsey NA.  Anthrax vaccine and causality assessment from individual case reports .  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf.  2002 Apr-May;11(3):185-7; discussion 203-4.

Jackson LA, Yu O, Heckbert SR, Psaty BM, Malais D, Barlow WE, Thompson WW, and the Vaccine Safety Datalink Study Group.   Influenza vaccination is not associated with a reduction in the risk of recurrent coronary events .  Am J Epidemiol.  2002;156 (7): 634-640.

Kohl K, Bonhoeffer J, Chen R, Duclos P, Heijbel H, et al.  The Brighton Collaboration: Enhancing comparability of vaccine safety data .  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2003 Jun;12(4):335-40.

Lathrop S, Ball R, Haber P, Mootrey G, Braun M, et al.  Adverse event reports following vaccination for Lyme disease: December 1998-July 2000 .  Vaccine.  2002 Feb 22;20(11-12):1603-8.

Mullooly, J, Pearson J, Drew L, Schuler R, Maher J, et al.  Wheezing lower respiratory disease and vaccination of full-term infants .  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf.  2002 Jan-Feb;11(1):21-30.

Pool V, Braun MM, Kelso JM, Mootrey G, Chen RT, et al.  Prevalence of anti-gelatin IgE antibodies in persons with anaphylaxis following measles-mumps-rubella vaccine in the U.S .  Pediatrics.  2002 Dec;110(6):e71.

Pless R. Hibbs B.  Chiropractic students attitudes about vaccination: A cause for concern?  CMAJ.  2002 Jun;166(12):1544-5.

Setia S, Mainzer H, Washington ML, Coil G, Snyder R, et al.  Frequency and causes of vaccine wastage .  Vaccine.  2002 Jan 15;20(7-8):1148-56.

Barlow WE, Davis RL, Glasser JW, Rhodes PH, Thompson RS, et al.  The risk of seizures after receipt of whole-cell pertussis or measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine .  N Engl J Med.  2001;345:656-61.

Chen RT, Pless R, Destefano F.   Epidemiology of autoimmune reactions induced by vaccination .  J Autoimmun  2001;16:309-18.

Chen RT, Pool V, Takahashi H, Weniger BG, Patel B.  Combination vaccines: Postlicensure safety evaluation .  Clin Infect Dis  2001;33 (Suppl 4):s327-s333.

Chen RT, DeStefano F, Pless R, Mootrey G, Kramarz P, Hibbs B. Challenges and Controversies in Immunization Safety. In: Peter G, Gardner P (eds). Vaccine recommendations: challenges and controversies.  Infect Dis Clinics of North America  2001;15:21-39.

Davis RL, Kramarz P, Bohlke K, Benson P, Thompson RS, et al.  Measles-mumps-rubella and other measles-containing vaccines do not increase the risk for inflammatory bowel disease: A case-control study from the Vaccine Safety Datalink project .  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med.  2001 Mar;155(3):354-359.

Davis RL, Lieu TA, Mell LK et al.  Impact of the change in polio vaccination schedule on immunization coverage rates: A study in two large health maintenance organizations .  Pediatrics  2001;107:671-676.

Destefano F, Davis RL, Chen RT.   Autism and MMR vaccination: Controversy laid to rest?   CNS Drugs.  2001;15(11):831-7.

DeStefano F, Mullooly JP, Okoro CA, Chen RT, Marcy SM, et al.  Childhood vaccinations, vaccination timing, and risk of type 1 diabetes mellitus .  Pediatrics.  2001;108:e112-3.

Jackson LA, Austin G, Chen RT, Stout R, DeStefano F, et al.  Safety and immunogenicity of varying doses of trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine administered by needle-free jet injectors .  Vaccine.  2001;19:4703-4709.

Kramarz P, France EK,  Black SB, Shinefield H, Ward JI, et al.  Population based study of rotavirus vaccination and intussusception .  Ped Infect Dis J.  2001 Apr;20(4):410-6.

Kramarz P, DeStefano F, Gargiullo P, Chen RT, Lieu TA, et al.  Does influenza vaccination prevent asthma exacerbations in children?   Journal of Pediatrics.  2001;138(3):306-10.

Lewis E, Shinefield HR, Woodruff BA, Black SB, DeStefano F, et al.  Safety of neonatal hepatitis B vaccine administration .  Pediatr Infect Dis J.  2001; 20: 1049-1054.

Lieu TA, Davis RL, Capra AM, et al.  Variation in clinician recommendations for multiple injections during adoptions of inactivated polio vaccine .  Pediatrics.  2001; 107:e49.

Meyerhoff AS, Weniger BG, Jacobs RJ.  The economic value to parents of reducing the pain and emotional distress of childhood vaccine injections .  Pediatr Infect Dis J.  2001;20(11):s57-s62.

Rota JS, Salmon DA, Rodewald LE, Chen RT, Hibbs BF, Gangarosa EJ.  Processes for obtaining nonmedical exemptions to State immunization laws .  AJPH.  2001;91:645-48.

Sewell EC, Jacobson SH, Weniger BG.  “Reverse engineering” a formulary selection algorithm to determine the economic value of pentavalent and hexavalent combination vaccines .  Pediatr Infect Dis J.  2001;20(11):s45-s56.

Verstraeten T, Baughman AL, Cadwell B, Zanardi L, Haber P, Chen R and VAERS Team.  Enhancing vaccine safety surveillance: A capture-recapture analysis of intussusception after rotavirus vaccination .   Am J Epidemiol  2001; 154:1006–12.

Wattigney WA, Mootrey GT, Braun MM, Chen RT.  Surveillance for poliovirus vaccine adverse events, 1991-1998: Impact of a sequential vaccination schedule of inactivated poliovirus vaccine followed by oral poliovirus vaccine .  Pediatrics.  2001; 107(5):E83.

Zanardi LR, Haber P, Mootrey GT, Niu MT, Wharton M.  Intussusception among recipients of rotavirus vaccine: Reports to the vaccine adverse event reporting system .   Pediatrics.  2001;107(6):E97.

Belay ED, Holman RC, Clarke MJ, DeStefano F, Shahriari A, et al.  The incidence of Kawasaki syndrome in West Coast health maintenance organizations .  Ped Infect Dis J . 2000;19:828-32.

Braun MM, Mootrey GT, Salive ME, Chen RT, Ellenberg SS, VAERS Working Group.  Infant immunization with acellular pertussis vaccines in the United States: Assessment of the first two years’ data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) .  Pediatrics. 2000;104(4):e51.

Chen RT, DeStefano F, Davis RL, Jackson LA, Thompson RS, et al. The Vaccine Safety Datalink: Immunization research in health maintenance organizations in the USA.  Bull WHO.  2000;78:186-194.

Chen RT, Hardy IRB, Rhodes PH, Tyshchenko DK, Moiseeva AV, Marievsky VF. Ukraine, 1992: First assessment of diphtheria vaccine effectiveness during the recent resurgence of diphtheria in the former Soviet Union: Introduction .  J Infect Dis  2000;181(suppl 1):S178-S183.

Chen RT, Mootrey GT, DeStefano F.  Safety of routine childhood vaccinations. An epidemiological review .  Pediatric Drugs.  2000;2(4):273-290.

Collet JP. MacDonald N. Cashman N. Pless R.  Monitoring signals for vaccine safety: The assessment of individual adverse event reports by an expert advisory committee. Advisory Committee on Causality Assessment .  Bull WHO.  2000;78(2):178-85.

DeStefano F.  Opportunities for population-based clinical research using data from managed care organizations . In: Davis JR, editor. Managed care systems and emerging infections. Washington, DC:  National Academy Press,  2000;16-8.

Feikin DR, Lezotte DC, Hamman RF, Salmon DA, Chen RT, Hoffman RE.  Individual and community risks of measles and pertussis associated with personal exemptions to immunization .  JAMA . 2000;284:3145-50.

Izurieta HS, Thompson WW, Kramarz P, Shay DK, Davis RL, et al.  Influenza and the rates of hospitalization for respiratory disease among infants and young children .  N Engl J Med.  2000;342(4):232-239.

Izurieta HS, Thompson WW, Shay DK. Influenza and hospitalizations in children [Letter].  N Engl J Med.  2000;342:1753.

Kramarz P, DeStefano F, Gargiullo PM, Davis RL, Chen RT, et al.  Influenza vaccination in children with asthma in health maintenance organizations .  Vaccine.  2000;18:2288-2294.

Kramarz P, DeStefano F, Gargiullo PM, Davis RL, Chen RT, et al.  Does influenza vaccination exacerbate asthma? Analysis of a large cohort of children with asthma .  Arch Fam Med.  2000;9(7):617-623.

Kuppermann M, Nease RF, Ackerson LM, Black SB, Shinefield HR, Lieu TA.  Parent preferences for outcomes associated with childhood vaccinations .  Pediatr Infect Dis.  2000;19:129-133.

Lieu TA, Black SB, Ray GT, Martin KE, Shinefield HR, Weniger BG.  The hidden costs of infant vaccination .  Vaccine.  2000;19:33-41.

Pless R.  Vaccination benefits, risks and safety: The need for a complete picture .  Bull WHO.  2000;78(2):219-221.

Pless R, Risher JF.  Mercury, infant neurodevelopment, and vaccination .  J Pediatr.  2000;136(5):571-573.

Salmon, DA., Gangarosa EJ, Chen RT.  Health consequences of exemptions from immunization laws [letter] .  JAMA.  2000; 283: 1141-2.

Takahashi H.  Need for improved vaccine safety surveillance .  Vaccine.  2000;19(9-10):1004.

Takahashi H, Pool V, Tsai TF, Chen RT.  Adverse events after Japanese Encephalitis vaccination: Review of post-marketing surveillance data from Japan and the United States .  Vaccine.  2000: 18(26), 2963-2969.

Wise RP, Salive ME, Braun MM, Mootrey GT, Seward JF, Rider LG, Krause PR.  Post licensure safety surveillance for varicella vaccine .  JAMA.  2000;284:1271-1279.

To receive email updates about this page, enter your email address:

Exit Notification / Disclaimer Policy

  • The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal website.
  • Linking to a non-federal website does not constitute an endorsement by CDC or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the website.
  • You will be subject to the destination website's privacy policy when you follow the link.
  • CDC is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on other federal or private website.

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Covid-19 vaccination acceptance and its associated factors among a middle eastern population.

\nWalid A. Al-Qerem

  • 1 Department of Pharmacy, Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
  • 2 Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan

Background: The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is a major threat to public health and has had a significant impact on all aspects of life. An effective vaccine is the most anticipated resolution. This study aims to evaluate Jordanian intent to be vaccinated.

Methods: This is a cross-sectional web-based study. Sample characteristics were gathered, and the participants were classified according to the degree of COVID-19 risk based on the categories of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Participants' KAP toward COVID-19 were assessed, and two scores were calculated: knowledge score and practice score. The association between different sample characteristics and these scores was identified using binary logistical regressions. The participants' vaccination intention was evaluated and multinomial logistic regression was applied to identify the predictors of vaccination intention. Finally, the reasons behind the participants' vaccination refusal/hesitation were determined and categorized into different groups.

Results: 1,144 participants were enrolled in the study (females = 66.5%). 30.4% of the participants were at high risk of COVID-19 complications, and 27.5% were at medium risk. Overall, participants' knowledge of COVID-19 symptoms, transmission methods, protective measures, and availability of cure were high (median of knowledge score = 17 out of 21). High protective practices were followed by many participants (median of practice score = 7 out of 10). 3.7% of participants were infected, and 6.4% suspected they were infected with the COVID-19 virus. 36.8% of the participants answered “No” when asked if they would take the vaccine once it becomes available, and 26.4% answered, “Not sure.” The main reasons for the participants' vaccination refusal or hesitancy were concerns regarding the use of vaccines and a lack of trust in them.

Conclusion: Participants reported high refusal/hesitancy. Several barriers were identified, and efforts should be intensified to overcome these barriers.

Introduction

The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been a health issue of great concern since 2020. Confirmed cases of the disease reached more than 35 million by October 2020 and have caused more than one million mortalities ( 1 ), particularly among the higher-risk population, including people who are obese, smokers, and patients that have cancer, chronic kidney disease, heart conditions, immunocompromised state, sickle cell disease, and type 2 diabetes mellitus ( 1 ).

In addition to the health impact of COVID-19, it has a significant economic burden that cannot be underestimated ( 2 ). It has caused a substantial reduction in workforces and an increase in unemployment globally ( 2 ). These negative impacts have encouraged pharmaceutical companies to develop a vaccine urgently. In December 2020, several vaccines were authorized to prevent COVID-19 infection ( 3 ), and more than 50 COVID-19 vaccine candidates were being developed ( 4 ). Vaccination has now begun in several countries around the world ( 5 ), with plans to begin vaccination in Jordan from February 2021 ( 6 ). Nevertheless, people still have doubts about the safety and efficacy of vaccines, including the longevity of protection against COVID-19, as several cases of reinfection have been reported ( 7 , 8 ). Moreover, the rapid development of vaccines casts doubt on safety. Previously, the rapid development of vaccines has been linked to adverse issues. For example, the swine flu vaccine increased the risk of Guillain-Barré syndrome ( 9 ).

Vaccines have been a successful measure of disease prevention for decades ( 10 ). However, vaccine hesitancy and refusal are significant concerns globally, prompting the World Health Organization (WHO) to declare this uncertainty among the top 10 health threats in 2019 ( 11 ). The causes of vaccine hesitancy, as reported in different studies, include religious reasons, personal beliefs, and safety concerns due to wide-spread myths, including the association of vaccines and autism, brain damage, and other conditions ( 12 ). Unfortunately, in Jordan, no sufficient studies have been conducted to assess the Jordanian population's attitudes toward vaccination. To the best of our knowledge, no previously published work has evaluated the intent of Jordanians to be vaccinated against COVID-19 when a vaccine does become available. The present study aims to evaluate the intent of people from Jordan to be vaccinated against COVID-19 and evaluate the different sample characteristics associated with vaccine refusal/hesitancy, including KAP.

Materials and Methods

This is a cross-sectional web-based survey. The enrolled participants were Jordanian in nationality and aged 18 years and above. A questionnaire was made using Google forms. The link was then distributed via different Jordanian all-purpose Facebook groups that included thousands of members. To ensure that participants met the inclusion criteria, questions about age, area of residence, and nationality were included in the questionnaire. Ethical approval was obtained from the Al-Zaytoonah ethical committee.

Study Instrument

The questionnaire was developed based on a literature review. A panel of experts confirmed the content validity of the questionnaire. The questionnaire was developed in the English language and then translated to Arabic, which is the only official language in Jordan (98% of the Jordanian population are Arabs and the remaining 2% use Arabic for their daily interactions) ( 13 ). It was then translated back into English by different translators, and finally, compared by a third translator. Face validity was conducted in a pilot study that included 30 participants who assessed the questionnaire's clarity, and no significant modifications were required.

The final Arabic version of the questionnaire consisted of six branched sections. The first section collected participants' demographic information, including marital status, smoking habits, obesity status, education level, household average monthly income, health status, and whether participants worked in or studied a health-related field. The second section gathered information about the participants' experience with COVID-19. The third section assessed the attitudes of participants toward COVID-19, while the fourth evaluated their knowledge about COVID-19, including symptoms, transmission methods, preventive measures, and treatment availability. The fifth section asked about the preventive measures against COVID-19 used by the participants. The sixth and final section asked about the participants' willingness to be vaccinated against COVID-19 (once available), and the participants who responded “No” or “Not sure” were asked to give their reasons.

The degree of Covid-19 risk affecting participants was determined according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) ( 1 ) categories. The high-risk group included smokers, obese, pregnant, or who had at least one of the following conditions (Type 2 diabetes mellitus/Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)/Cancer/Kidney Failure/Heart diseases/Organ transplantation/Sickle Cell Anemia). The medium-risk group included those who did not fit for the high-risk category but were overweight or had at least one of these conditions (Type 1 diabetes mellitus/Hypertension/Bone marrow transplant/ Cerebrovascular diseases or stroke/ Cystic Fibrosis/Asthma/Taking steroids or immunosuppressant drugs/Hepatic diseases/ Thalassemia/Lung fibrosis). The low-risk group included all other participants that do not fit the previously mentioned criteria.

Two scores were calculated: the knowledge score and the practice score. For knowledge, the maximum possible score was 21, as for each right answer, one point was granted (the score was calculated based on items in Table 3 ). The participants were divided into two groups based on their knowledge scores. The high-knowledge group included participants that scored more than the total sample median (median = 17), and the low-knowledge group included participants that scored below the total sample median.

Practice scores were calculated for those who had not been infected with the COVID-19 virus. One point was added for each answer representing a scientifically proven protective measure against COVID-19, and the maximum possible score was 10. After calculating the practice scores, the participants were divided into two groups. The high protective practice group included those who scored more than the sample median (median = 7), and the low protective practice group included those who scored below the median.

Statistical Analysis

Kish formula ( 14 ) was applied to determine the least required sample size with a confidence interval level of 95% and a 4% margin for error. The estimated sample size was 600. Categorical variables were presented, such as frequency and percentages, and continuous variables were presented as means and standard deviations (SD). Crosstabulation with χ2 was applied to evaluate the association between intent to be vaccinated and participants' demographic characteristics, knowledge level about COVID-19, and protective practice against COVID-19. Binary logistic regressions were conducted on participants who answered “No” to “Have you ever been infected with COVID-19?” to evaluate variables associated with knowledge level and protective practice against COVID-19 level. A multinomial logistic regression was used to evaluate the variables related to the participants' intent to be vaccinated when a vaccine against COVID-19 becomes available.

An analysis of variance (ANOVA) with LSD post hoc test was applied to measure the difference in the perceived degree of seriousness of COVID-19 between participants with different responses to “Have you ever been infected with COVID-19?” All statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS version 25.

Sample characteristics are presented in Table 1 . Thousand one hundred fourty four participants were enrolled in the study. Almost half of the participants (54.6%) were between 18–29 years, and 26.9% were between 30–40 years. 66.5% of the participants were female. Half of the participants were currently married, and 47.4% did not have children. Those with bachelor's degrees represented 53.5% of the sample, and <7% had a high school education or less. Most participants (67.2%) lived in Amman, and <4% lived in the southern governorates.

www.frontiersin.org

Table 1 . Sample characteristics.

The participants' health status is outlined in Table 2 . Fifteen percent of the participants had chronic diseases. Approximately one-third (30.4%) of the participants were at high risk of COVID-19 complications, and 27.5% were at medium risk.

www.frontiersin.org

Table 2 . Participants' health status.

Table 3 represents the participants' knowledge about COVID-19 and vaccination. The most known symptom of COVID-19 was fever (97.6%), followed by the loss of smell and taste (96.8%), and the least known symptom was chills (70.1%). 99.2% of the participants were aware that the COVID-19 virus could be transmitted via the inhalation of respiratory droplets from an infected person. The most commonly known protective procedure amongst participants was social distancing (97.6%), followed by avoiding touching face/mouth/nose/eyes (95.4%) and using detergents (94.8%). 30.9% of the participants knew that zinc consumption could not prevent COVID-19 infection, and 15.6% knew the same fact about vitamin C.

www.frontiersin.org

Table 3 . Participants' knowledge about COVID-19 and vaccination.

Participants' attitudes and practices toward COVID-19 are shown in Table 4 . Only 12.1% of the participants reported receiving the influenza vaccine last year. A fifth of the participants had done the PCR test to check if they had COVID-19, and 3.7% of the participants tested positive. 58.9% expect that they will be infected with COVID-19 but that their symptoms would be mild. In their response to their intention to take the COVID-19 vaccine once it was available, only 36.8% of the participants intend to be vaccinated, and 26.4% were not sure.

www.frontiersin.org

Table 4 . Participants' attitudes and practices toward COVID-19 and vaccination.

The results of binary logistical regression between knowledge score and different sample characteristics are shown in Table 5 . Not knowing someone infected with COVID-19 significantly decreased the odds of having high knowledge scores compared to those who knew someone infected ( p -value = 0.01). A low or medium household monthly average income also considerably reduced the odds of having a high knowledge score compared to high income. Lastly, those with a high-risk of COVID-19 had significantly lower odds of getting high knowledge scores compared to those with low-risk degree.

www.frontiersin.org

Table 5 . Binary logistical regression analysis of knowledge score.

The results of binary logistical regression between practice score and different sample characteristics are shown in Table 6 . Significant predictors of high protective practices were older groups (those who were older than 60 years compared to those between 18–29 years), not having children, residency (AlZarqa residents when compared to Amman residents), and higher knowledge score ( p -values < 0.05). Meanwhile, the only significant predictor of low protective practices was being unmarried ( p -value = 0.03).

www.frontiersin.org

Table 6 . Binary logistical regression analysis of practice score.

The χ2 test assessed the association between the sample characteristics and the participant's intent to be vaccinated (Appendix) and revealed that the participants' characteristics were significantly associated with the response of “No” vs. “Yes,” when they were female, married, having children, and had a diploma degree. On the other hand, acquaintance with someone who was infected with COVID-19 was significantly associated with the response of “Yes” vs. “No” and “Yes” vs. “Not sure” ( p -values 0.01 and 0.03, respectively). Higher percentages of those who work/study in the medical field responded “Yes” rather than “Not sure” (39.7 vs. 23.9%). Those who wore face masks and used detergents, but did not consume vitamin C to protect themselves from COVID-19, had a higher percentage of “Yes” vs. “No” ( p -values= 0.002, 0.02, and 0.04, respectively). No significant difference was found in the vaccine acceptance between the participants with different risk degrees for COVID-19 complications (Percentage of responding “Yes” was 37.1 % in the high-risk group, 35.9% in the medium-risk group, and 37.2% in the low-risk group).

Table 7 shows the multivariate predictors of responding “Not Sure” or “No” regarding the intent to be vaccinated, according to the multinomial model. Female participants had a 3-fold higher relative likelihood of responding “No” vs. “Yes” and a nearly 1.5-fold higher relative chance of responding “Not sure” vs. “Yes” when compared with male participants ( p -values < 0.05). Moreover, a significant association was found between the participants' perception of the seriousness of COVID-19 and his/her intention to be vaccinated. The higher the perceived seriousness of COVID 19, the significantly lower the odds of responding “Not sure” or “No.”

www.frontiersin.org

Table 7 . Multivariate predictors of responding “not sure” or “no” regarding intent to be vaccinated.

Table 8 represents the attitudes and practices of those who were infected with COVID-19 or suspected infection. Those who were infected adhered to quarantine procedures significantly more than those who suspected they were infected. Moreover, confirmed cases of COVID-19 tended to tell relatives/friends more about infection, compared to those who suspected infection. ANOVA with post hoc analysis indicated that there were no significant differences in the perception of COVID-19 seriousness between the three groups (infected, suspected infection, and not infected with COVID-19).

www.frontiersin.org

Table 8 . Attitudes and Practices of the participants who were infected or suspected their infection.

The reasons participants' did not want to take the vaccine or were hesitant about vaccination are shown in Table 9 . The most mentioned reasons were concerns about the vaccines as 98.3% of those who answered “No” and 99.3% of those who answered “Not sure” had at least one concern. Concerns about the efficacy of the vaccine and its newness were the most reported by the participant, while the least reported concern was about the association between vaccination and autism (7.8%). The second most mentioned reasons represented attitudes toward vaccines. 52.3% of those who answered “No” stated that they do not take vaccines at all. The need for additional information was a cause for answering “No” or “Not sure” for 87.9 and 97.4%, respectively, of the participants. Lack of trust was another reason for refusal or hesitation about taking the vaccine once available as 81% and 66.2%, respectively, of those who answered “No” or “Not sure” believed that the vaccine might have been approved too quickly because of political pressure.

www.frontiersin.org

Table 9 . Reasons participants provided for responding “no” or “not sure” regarding intent to be vaccinated.

In recent history, vaccination has played an essential role in reducing the burden of infectious diseases. It prevented 33,000 deaths and 14 million diseases in 2001 ( 15 ). Vaccines from different companies, including Pfizer BioNTech, Moderna, and Oxford AstraZeneca have recently been approved, but their distribution is still limited ( 16 ). Identifying the populations' intention to be vaccinated, and the barriers to vaccination could remove these barriers and increase the vaccination rate once the vaccine is widely available.

Attitudes and Practices of Participants Infected With COVID-19 or Suspected That They Were

The participants' perception of the seriousness of COVID-19 among participants was not associated with COVID-19 infection history. The degree of seriousness estimations were not different between those who were not infected, those who suspected their infection, and those who were infected (means = 6.49, 6.52, and 6.57, respectively). High adherence to quarantine was reported by those infected, which contradicts the results of other studies ( 17 , 18 ), which reported poor adherence to quarantine during different pandemics. However, the degree of quarantine adherence among those who were certain about their infection was significantly higher than those who only suspected that they were infected. This indicates the importance of COVID-19 testing in decreasing the disease spread by increasing the adherence of infected patients to quarantine.

Vaccination Intentions

Even though this study was conducted in October 2020 when the number of COVID-19 cases increased rapidly in Jordan, only 36.8% of participants intend to be vaccinated once the vaccine was available. This percentage is much lower than the percentage reported by a global survey that included participants from 19 countries ( 19 ) (71.5%) and by studies conducted in Ecuador ( 20 ) (97%), the United States ( 21 ) (57%), France ( 22 ) (76%), China ( 23 ) (91.3%), and Saudi Arabia ( 24 ) (64.7%). The peak rise in COVID-19 cases happened much earlier in other countries than in Jordan, which may contribute to the higher vaccination hesitancy among the Jordanian population compared to other populations, as the disease is new to Jordan. Although the percentage of the population who need to be vaccinated to achieve herd immunity against COVID-19 is not yet well-known, in general, 50–90% ( 25 ) of the population needs to be immune either naturally or by vaccines to achieve herd immunity. Should this high hesitancy toward vaccination continue among the Jordanian population, it might be difficult to achieve herd immunity. Several sample characteristics had a significant negative impact on the participants' intention to be vaccinated, including; being female, married, and having a postgrad degree compared to university students. Lower vaccination intention among female participants was also observed in studies conducted in France ( 22 ), China ( 23 ), and Europe ( 26 ). However, other factors reported in other studies, like income ( 22 , 26 ) and age ( 22 ), were not significant predictors in this study. The recognition of these factors could help develop targeted awareness campaigns directed to the population to increase the vaccination rate once the vaccine is available.

The perceived risk of COVID-19 was a significant predictor of the participants' vaccination intention in this study, reflecting several other studies ( 22 , 23 ). The higher the perceived risk, the lower the vaccination hesitancy. Therefore, increasing the population's consciousness about the seriousness of the disease is essential in improving their willingness to be vaccinated.

Detecting the causes of vaccination refusal or hesitancy could improve the population's vaccination intentions. It is important to better understand the rationales and reasons for vaccination refusal or hesitancy if we are to remove these barriers.

Concerns about the vaccine were the most common reason behind hesitancy or refusal among the participants. These concerns about vaccine safety and side effects are global, as indicated by studies conducted in the United States ( 21 ), Europe ( 26 ), and China ( 23 ). The rationale behind these concerns is reasonable, as several vaccine candidate trials were paused ( 27 , 28 ) due to detected side effects. However, the suspension of these studies, once side effects were noted, could be used to assure the rigor of vaccine testing, another concern among the population. Misbeliefs about the association between vaccines and autism or the vaccine's effect on fertility were not common among the participants, implying the dubiety about many popular myths associated with vaccines.

Efficacy is a frequently mentioned concern whenever a new vaccine is developed ( 29 , 30 ). This concern could be of less importance once the vaccine is available and successful results are published.

Undesirable attitudes were the second most mentioned barriers. Increasing the population's understanding of the vaccines and the related mechanisms of action through different awareness-raising methods could overcome this barrier. About 30% of those with undesirable attitudes were against vaccination in general. Several studies ( 31 , 32 ) have established approaches to overcome vaccine refusal that could be useful for COVID-19 vaccination. For example, opposing the spread of false information and targeting children and adolescence, who might not have robust emotions about vaccines yet, could increase COVID-19 vaccine acceptability.

The need for additional information was reported as a barrier by 58% of the respondents and 79% of participants in an Indonesian study ( 33 ). The role of healthcare providers is influential in this respect, as they provide patients and the general population with much-needed information. An Australian study ( 34 ) provided a framework that could be used by healthcare providers to increase confidence in any potential COVID-19 vaccines.

Lack of trust was also a cause of vaccination hesitation or refusal for many participants in this study and an American study ( 21 ). A belief in the conspiracy theories associated with COVID-19 among the Jordanian population was observed in the present study. These beliefs have also been reported by another Jordanian study on COVID-19 (unpublished data). Several strategies have been suggested to combat conspiracy theories ( 35 ), including the careful dissemination of medical research, social media campaigns, and developing a culture of fact-checking. A report issued by WHO has discussed the behavioral considerations of COVID-19 acceptance and suggested different approaches to increasing vaccine acceptance. These include building an enabling environment and using open communication to address people's beliefs and uncertainty, educating them about the safety and efficacy of the vaccine ( 36 ). Social and governmental collaboration will increase public confidence in the COVID-19 vaccine and enable the country to reach herd immunity rapidly.

Strengths and Limitations

One of this study's strengths is the large sample size, which decreases the influence of existing bias. Another strong aspect of the present study is that it evaluated the participants' KAP toward COVID-19 and their vaccination intentions and assessed the association between KAP and vaccination intentions.

At the time this study was conducted, the vaccine was not available. The participants' vaccination intentions may be different now, as the vaccine has been made available. More information has now been published, which may be considered a limitation of this study. This study was based on an online questionnaire, meaning the results are subject to recall and selection biases. However, previous studies have shown that web-based research is a cost-effective method that can be used to generate a sample that is representative of the total population with a fraction of the cost ( 37 ). It can reach people otherwise unreachable and provides a safe and private environment for the respondents to answer questions accurately and honestly compared with face-to-face interviews ( 38 ).

It has been suggested that as the number of Internet users has increased globally, the socio-demographic characteristics of the recruited participants via web-based surveys reflect the general population ( 39 ). This can be applied in Jordan as Internet users are estimated to be 67% of all age groups ( 40 ). This percentage could be higher when children under the age of 18 are excluded. Another limitation could be that the study sample age was positively skewed. However, the Jordanian population is a young one, and the age group between 20–29 years represents 33.45% of the total population above the age of 19 ( 41 ).

Finally, almost half of the sample participants worked in the medical field, which may cast doubt in the sample's representation of the total population. Nevertheless, the percentage of medical field workers in Jordan is significantly higher than in other countries globally. For example, Jordan is ranked fourth in terms of the number of pharmacists for every 10,000 people (16 pharmacists for 10,000) ( 42 ). Furthermore, the authors believe that the perception of medical-related staff is particularly interesting, as their opinions influence the general population, and they represent a high-risk group, therefore, their vaccination is a priority. Finally, as indicated by the Kish formula, the smallest required sample size is 600, therefore, a study sample that includes 1,144 participants could provide sufficient data to evaluate each subgroup.

The results of this study indicate that the study sample has good KAP toward COVID-19. However, the participants' vaccination intentions were unfavorable. The total sample acceptance of the vaccine was 36.8%, while the approval of the participants who work/study in a medical field or those who are at high risk of COVID-19 complications was slightly higher (39.7 and 37.1%, respectively). The main reasons for participants' refusal of vaccination or hesitation were concerns about safety and efficacy, in addition to insufficient information about the vaccine. Healthcare providers must activate their roles and address these concerns by increasing awareness about the role of vaccination in preventing the spread of infection and acquiring herd immunity. This could be achieved by designing and implanting different awareness campaigns via various media outlets guided by healthcare providers.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics Statement

The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Al Zaytoonah University of Jordan ethical committee. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.

Author Contributions

WA-Q: methodology, formal analysis, data curation, original draft preparation, writing, review and editing, funding acquisition, supervision, and final approval of the submitted manuscript. AJ: draft preparation, writing, review and editing, and final approval of the submitted manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

This work was funded by Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan Grant number (22/23/2019-2020).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Raghda Qarqaz for help with data acquisition and analysis and writing and editing this article.

1. Certain Medical Conditions and Risk for Severe COVID-19 Illness | CDC . Available online at: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/need-extra-precautions/people-with-medical-conditions.html (accessed November 10, 2020).

2. Nicola M, Alsafi Z, Sohrabi C, Kerwan A, Al-Jabir A, Iosifidis C, et al. The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19): a review. Int J Surg. (2020) 78:185–93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.018

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Different COVID-19 Vaccines | CDC . Available online at: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/different-vaccines.html (accessed December 31, 2020).

4. The push for a COVID-19 vaccine . Available online at: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/covid-19-vaccines?gclid=Cj0KCQjw2or8BRCNARIsAC_ppyYWO0oDbvpd9sqLLJWdKFEjk55hNRAllDrsejAc9bXJtb4lzTWr5F8aAoa8EALw_wcB (accessed October 11, 2020).

Google Scholar

5. More Than 12 Million Shots Given: Covid-19 Vaccine Tracker . Available online at: https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/covid-vaccine-tracker-global-distribution/ (accessed January 3, 2021).

6. Jordan Times. Jordan to begin COVID-19 vaccination drive by February–Health minister | Jordan Times. (2020) Available online at: https://www.jordantimes.com/news/local/jordan-begin-covid-19-vaccination-drive-february-health-minister (accessed January 3, 2021).

7. South Korea reports more recovered coronavirus patients testing positive again | Reuters . Available online at: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-coronavirus-southkorea-idUSKCN21V0JQ (accessed October 11, 2020).

8. Chen D, Xu W, Lei Z, Huang Z, Liu J, Gao Z, et al. Recurrence of positive SARS-CoV-2 RNA in COVID-19: a case report. Int J Infect Dis. (2020) 93:297–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.03.003

9. Swine flu vaccine “link” to “deadly” nerve condition—NHS . Available online at: https://www.nhs.uk/news/medication/swine-flu-vaccine-link-to-deadly-nerve-condition/ (accessed October 11, 2020).

10. Vaccines and immunization. Available online at: https://www.who.int/health-topics/vaccines-and-immunization?gclid=Cj0KCQjw2or8BRCNARIsAC_ppyZIpSAUsqJtN6zatE-G_pjHFu7IaD7d4WvtsYoA1bV_Xh1ntb6hRxUaAnv2EALw_wcB#tab=tab_1 (accessed October 11, 2020).

11. Geoghegan S, O'Callaghan KP, Offit PA. Vaccine safety: myths and misinformation. Front Microbiol. (2020) 11:372. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00372

12. McKee C, Bohannon K. Exploring the reasons behind parental refusal of vaccines. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. (2018) 21:104–9. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-21.2.104

13. CIA. CIA Factbook—Jordan . (2020). Available online at: https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/static/1b0149b702296011b535094f4d251f48/JO-summary.pdf (accessed January 7, 2021).

14. Kish L. Survey Sampling . New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, Inc (1965).

15. Zhou F, Santoli J, Messonnier ML, Yusuf HR, Shefer A, Chu SY, et al. Economic evaluation of the 7-vaccine routine childhood immunization schedule in the United States, 2001. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. (2005) 159:1136–44. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.159.12.1136

16. COVID-19 Vaccine. Vaccine Safety, Distribution & FAQs | UCHealth . Available online at: https://www.uchealth.org/services/infectious-diseases/coronavirus-covid-19/covid-19-vaccine/ (accessed December 31, 2020).

17. Hsu CC, Chen T, Chang M, Chang YK. Confidence in controlling a SARS outbreak: experiences of public health nurses in managing home quarantine measures in Taiwan. Am J Infect Control. (2006) 34:176–81. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2005.11.008

18. Reynolds DL, Garay JR, Deamond SL, Moran MK, Gold W, Styra R. Understanding, compliance and psychological impact of the SARS quarantine experience. Epidemiol Infect. (2008) 136:997–1007. doi: 10.1017/S0950268807009156

19. Lazarus JV, Ratzan SC, Palayew A, Gostin LO, Larson HJ, Rabin K, et al. A global survey of potential acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine. Nat Med. (2020). doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1124-9. [Epub ahead of print].

20. Sarasty O, Carpio CE, Hudson D, Guerrero-Ochoa PA, Borja I. The demand for a COVID-19 vaccine in Ecuador. Vaccine. (2020) 38:8090–8. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.11.013

21. Fisher KA, Bloomstone SJ, Walder J, Crawford S, Fouayzi H, Mazor KM. Attitudes toward a potential SARS-CoV-2 vaccine: a survey of U.S. adults. Ann Intern Med. (2020) 173:964–73. doi: 10.7326/m20-3569

22. Ward JK, Alleaume C, Peretti-Watel P. The French public's attitudes to a future COVID-19 vaccine: the politicization of a public health issue. Soc Sci Med. (2020) 265:113414. doi: 10.31235/osf.io/xphe9

23. Wang J, Jing R, Lai X, Zhang H, Lyu Y, Knoll MD, et al. Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination during the COVID-19 Pandemic in China. Vaccines. (2020) 8:482. doi: 10.3390/VACCINES8030482

24. Al-Mohaithef M, Padhi BK. Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in saudi arabia: a web-based national survey. J Multidiscip Healthc. (2020) 13:1657–63. doi: 10.2147/jmdh.s276771

25. D'Souza G, Dowdy D. What is herd immunity and how can we achieve it with COVID-19? —COVID-19—Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health . (2020). Available online at: https://www.jhsph.edu/covid-19/articles/achieving-herd-immunity-with-covid19.html (accessed November 2, 2020).

26. Neumann-Böhme S, Varghese NE, Sabat I, Barros PP, Brouwer W, van Exel J, et al. Once we have it, will we use it? A European survey on willingness to be vaccinated against COVID-19. Eur J Heal Econ. (2020) 21:977–82. doi: 10.1007/s10198-020-01208-6

27. Meredith S. AstraZeneca: Our coronavirus vaccine triggers adult immune response . Available online at: https://www.cnbc.com/2020/10/26/oxford-astrazeneca-coronavirus-vaccine-reportedly-triggers-immune-response-among-adults-.html (accessed November 2, 2020).

28. J&J's COVID-19 vaccine trial paused on safety concerns—PharmaTimes . Available online at: http://www.pharmatimes.com/news/j_and_js_covid-19_vaccine_trial_paused_on_safety_concerns_1353054 (accessed November 11, 2020).

29. Determann D, Korfage IJ, Lambooij MS, Bliemer M, Richardus JH, Steyerberg EW, et al. Acceptance of vaccinations in pandemic outbreaks: a discrete choice experiment. PLoS ONE. (2014) 9:e102505. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102505

30. Kreps S, Prasad S, Brownstein JS, Hswen Y, Garibaldi BT, Zhang B, et al. Factors associated with US adults' likelihood of accepting COVID-19 vaccination. JAMA Netw Open. (2020) 3:e2025594. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.25594

31. Arede M, Bravo-Araya M, Bouchard É, Gill GS, Plajer V, Shehraj A, et al. Combating vaccine hesitancy: teaching the next generation to navigate through the post truth era. Front Public Heal. (2019) 6:381. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00381

32. Swingle CA. How do we approach anti-vaccination attitudes? Mo Med. (2018) 115:180–1.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

33. Ministry T. COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance Survey in Indonesia . Jakarta: UNICEF (2020).

34. Danchin M, Biezen R, Manski-Nankervis J-A, Kaufman J, Leask J. Preparing the public for COVID-19 vaccines: how can general practitioners build vaccine confidence and optimise uptake for themselves and their patients? Aust J Gen Pract. (2020) 49:625–9. doi: 10.31128/AJGP-08-20-5559

35. Trethewey SP. Strategies to combat medical misinformation on social media. Postgrad Med J. (2020) 96:4–6. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2019-137201

36. WH Organization. Behavioural Considerations for Acceptance and Uptake of COVID-19 Vaccines: WHO Technical Advisory Group on Behavioural Insights and Sciences for Health, Meeting Report, 15 October 2020 . World Health Organization (2020).

37. Fenner Y, Garland SM, Moore EE, Jayasinghe Y, Fletcher A, Tabrizi SN, et al. Web-based recruiting for health research using a social networking site: an exploratory study. J Med Internet Res. (2012) 14:e20. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1978

38. Cantrell MA, Lupinacci P. Methodological issues in online data collection. J Adv Nurs. (2007) 60:544–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04448.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Im EO, Chee W. Recruitment of research participants through the internet. Comput Informatics Nurs. (2004) 22:289–97. doi: 10.1097/00024665-200409000-00009

40. Digital 2020: Jordan — DataReportal – Global Digital Insights . Available online at: https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2020-jordan (accessed January 3, 2021).

41. Department of statistics. Estimated Population of Jordan by Sex and Age Group, at End-year 2019 . (2019). Available onlineat: http://dosweb.dos.gov.jo/population/population-2/ (accessed January 2, 2021).

42. Pharmacists (per 10 000 population). Available online at: https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/indicators/indicator-details/GHO/pharmacists-(per-10-000-population) (accessed November 15, 2020).

Keywords: knowladge, attitude, practice, COVID-19, vaccine

Citation: Al-Qerem WA and Jarab AS (2021) COVID-19 Vaccination Acceptance and Its Associated Factors Among a Middle Eastern Population. Front. Public Health 9:632914. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.632914

Received: 24 November 2020; Accepted: 11 January 2021; Published: 10 February 2021.

Reviewed by:

Copyright © 2021 Al-Qerem and Jarab. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Walid A. Al-Qerem, waleed.qirim@zuj.edu.jo

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

  • Alzheimer's disease & dementia
  • Arthritis & Rheumatism
  • Attention deficit disorders
  • Autism spectrum disorders
  • Biomedical technology
  • Diseases, Conditions, Syndromes
  • Endocrinology & Metabolism
  • Gastroenterology
  • Gerontology & Geriatrics
  • Health informatics
  • Inflammatory disorders
  • Medical economics
  • Medical research
  • Medications
  • Neuroscience
  • Obstetrics & gynaecology
  • Oncology & Cancer
  • Ophthalmology
  • Overweight & Obesity
  • Parkinson's & Movement disorders
  • Psychology & Psychiatry
  • Radiology & Imaging
  • Sleep disorders
  • Sports medicine & Kinesiology
  • Vaccination
  • Breast cancer
  • Cardiovascular disease
  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • Colon cancer
  • Coronary artery disease
  • Heart attack
  • Heart disease
  • High blood pressure
  • Kidney disease
  • Lung cancer
  • Multiple sclerosis
  • Myocardial infarction
  • Ovarian cancer
  • Post traumatic stress disorder
  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Schizophrenia
  • Skin cancer
  • Type 2 diabetes
  • Full List »

share this!

May 3, 2024

This article has been reviewed according to Science X's editorial process and policies . Editors have highlighted the following attributes while ensuring the content's credibility:

fact-checked

peer-reviewed publication

trusted source

Study reveals how COVID-19 vaccines prevent severe disease

by University of Oxford

Study reveals how COVID-19 vaccines prevent severe disease

A study by scientists at the University of Oxford, has unveiled crucial insights into the way that COVID-19 vaccines mitigate severe illness in those who have been vaccinated.

Despite the global success of COVID-19 vaccination campaigns, concerns remain around the continued spread of this disease including in vaccinated individuals. For this reason, researchers at the Oxford Vaccine Group conducted an extensive investigation into the human immune response to COVID-19, in both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals.

Employing contemporary "big-data" analyses, scientists can find novel associations between fundamental biological entities and indicators of the severity of a disease—to build patterns of health and disease.

Results of this study, published in the journal Nature Communications , categorically show a reduction in indicators of disease severity in those who had received the vaccine, demonstrating that the harmful inflammatory reaction to COVID-19 is less severe in those who have been vaccinated, when compared with those who haven't.

Professor Daniel O'Connor, Head of Bioinformatics at the Oxford Vaccine Group (OVG), led the study. He said, "These results confirm the efficacy of vaccination and its pivotal role in reducing the harmful consequences associated with COVID-19. The results of our research highlight the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine's ability to modulate harmful responses to the SARS-CoV-2 virus, and therefore to reduce the severity of illness.

"The implications of these findings are far-reaching, offering evidence that is fundamental to future vaccine development and pandemic mitigation strategies. It also provides valuable guidance for policymakers and public health experts."

Professor Sir Andrew Pollard, Ashall Professor of Infection and Immunity and Director of the Oxford Vaccine Group, said, "Better understanding of how vaccines can reduce the severity of infections caused by viruses like COVID-19 is a key part of our preparedness to make effective vaccines against the next pandemic threat. Ongoing research is critical as we know the next one is coming but we don't know which virus or when it will be."

The study employed state-of-the-art technologies, including RNA-sequencing (to capture the level of genes produced by blood cells ), to achieve these results. While the findings are promising, the study acknowledges limitations such as a focus on mild cases and sample size constraints, highlighting the need for further research utilizing advanced techniques to enhance resolution.

Key findings from the study include:

  • Identification of unique responses to COVID-19 among vaccinated individuals, highlighting the vaccine's influence on responses to this disease.
  • Demonstrated reduction in harmful responses associated with COVID-19 severity in recipients of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine compared with unvaccinated counterparts.
  • COVID-19 in vaccinated individuals resulted in less COVID-19-induced blood cell count changes.
  • Correlation between decreased levels of a particular class of molecules in blood (microRNAs) and elevated levels of inflammation, suggesting a regulatory role for these molecules in inflammatory responses to viral infection.

Explore further

Feedback to editors

covid 19 vaccines research topics

Research team identifies four new genetic risk factors for multiple system atrophy

37 minutes ago

covid 19 vaccines research topics

About 90% of US adults are on the way to heart disease, study suggests

38 minutes ago

covid 19 vaccines research topics

Researchers identify what drives PARP inhibitor resistance in advanced breast cancer

covid 19 vaccines research topics

How infections influence our social empathy

2 hours ago

covid 19 vaccines research topics

Health risks of using cannabis are higher in adolescents than in adults, study finds

covid 19 vaccines research topics

Study finds THC lingers in breastmilk with no clear peak point

3 hours ago

covid 19 vaccines research topics

New study offers insight into genesis of spina bifida

covid 19 vaccines research topics

Serotonergic neuron findings suggest possible treatment for depression-related infertility

covid 19 vaccines research topics

Strengthening CAR-T therapy to work against solid tumors

covid 19 vaccines research topics

Study reveals role of iron in allergic asthma and points to potential new therapies

Related stories.

covid 19 vaccines research topics

COVID jab linked to lower risk of COVID-19–related clot and heart complications

Mar 13, 2024

covid 19 vaccines research topics

mRNA vaccine more effective booster to ChAdOx1 nCoV-19

Oct 22, 2021

covid 19 vaccines research topics

COVID-19 vaccine impact on chest CT of pneumonia in symptomatic patients

Jun 1, 2022

covid 19 vaccines research topics

Study finds dual COVID and flu vaccination reduces infection rates

Jan 10, 2023

covid 19 vaccines research topics

Antibody properties in plasma can predict COVID-19 severity

Feb 10, 2023

covid 19 vaccines research topics

SARS-CoV-2 infection weakens immune-cell response to vaccination, suggests study

Mar 20, 2023

Recommended for you

covid 19 vaccines research topics

Team develops computational approach to redesign antibodies for broader effectiveness against viral pandemics

5 hours ago

covid 19 vaccines research topics

Researchers may have found an Achilles heel for Hepatitis B

6 hours ago

covid 19 vaccines research topics

Researchers outline how cells activate to cause fibrosis and organ scarring

7 hours ago

covid 19 vaccines research topics

Tailored vaccine could one day treat eczema in children

covid 19 vaccines research topics

You're breathing potential carcinogens inside your car, says study

May 7, 2024

Let us know if there is a problem with our content

Use this form if you have come across a typo, inaccuracy or would like to send an edit request for the content on this page. For general inquiries, please use our contact form . For general feedback, use the public comments section below (please adhere to guidelines ).

Please select the most appropriate category to facilitate processing of your request

Thank you for taking time to provide your feedback to the editors.

Your feedback is important to us. However, we do not guarantee individual replies due to the high volume of messages.

E-mail the story

Your email address is used only to let the recipient know who sent the email. Neither your address nor the recipient's address will be used for any other purpose. The information you enter will appear in your e-mail message and is not retained by Medical Xpress in any form.

Newsletter sign up

Get weekly and/or daily updates delivered to your inbox. You can unsubscribe at any time and we'll never share your details to third parties.

More information Privacy policy

Donate and enjoy an ad-free experience

We keep our content available to everyone. Consider supporting Science X's mission by getting a premium account.

E-mail newsletter

  • International edition
  • Australia edition
  • Europe edition

Scientist in a lab

Scientists create vaccine with potential to protect against future coronaviruses

Researchers say experimental shot is step towards goal of creating vaccines before a pandemic has started

Scientists have created a vaccine that has the potential to protect against a broad range of coronaviruses, including varieties that are not yet even known about.

The experimental shot, which has been tested in mice, marks a change in strategy towards “proactive vaccinology”, where vaccines are designed and readied for manufacture before a potentially pandemic virus emerges.

The vaccine is made by attaching harmless proteins from different coronaviruses to minuscule nanoparticles that are then injected to prime the body’s defences to fight the viruses should they ever invade.

Because the vaccine trains the immune system to target proteins that are shared across many different types of coronavirus, the protection it induces is extremely broad, making it effective against known and unknown viruses in the same family.

“We’ve shown that a relatively simple vaccine can still provide a scattershot response across a range of different viruses,” said Rory Hills, a graduate researcher at the University of Cambridge and first author of the report. “It takes us one step forward towards our goal of creating vaccines before a pandemic has even started.”

Tests in mice showed that the vaccine induced a broad immune response to coronaviruses, including Sars-Cov-1, the pathogen that caused the 2003 Sars outbreak, even though proteins from that virus were not added to the vaccine nanoparticles. Details of the work, a collaboration between the universities of Cambridge and Oxford and the California Institute of Technology, are published in Nature Nanotechnology.

The universal coronavirus vaccine can be made in existing facilities for microbial fermentation, Hills said, adding that the researchers were working with industrial partners on ways to scale up the process. The nanoparticles and viral proteins can be made at different times in different places and mixed together to produce the vaccine.

Medical regulators do not have procedures for proactive vaccinology and the researchers say these would have to be worked out with the relevant bodies. If the vaccine were found to be safe and effective in humans, one option would be to use it as a Covid booster with the added benefit of it protecting against other coronaviruses.

More likely is that countries would hold stocks of the vaccine, and others designed to target separate pathogens, once they have been manufactured and approved. “In the event that a coronavirus or other pathogen crosses over you could have pre-existing vaccine stocks ready and a clear plan to quickly scale up production if needed,” Hills said.

Prof Mark Howarth, a senior author of the study, said: “Scientists did a great job in quickly producing an extremely effective Covid vaccine during the last pandemic, but the world still had a massive crisis with a huge number of deaths. We need to work out how we can do even better than that in the future, and a powerful component of that is starting to build the vaccines in advance.”

  • Vaccines and immunisation
  • Coronavirus
  • Infectious diseases
  • Medical research
  • Microbiology

More on this story

covid 19 vaccines research topics

Cheaper private Covid jabs may end up as costly as pricier ones, say experts

covid 19 vaccines research topics

Boots to offer Covid vaccines in England for nearly £100 a jab

covid 19 vaccines research topics

‘Hypervaccinated’ man reportedly received 217 Covid jabs without side effects

covid 19 vaccines research topics

UK health officials bring forward autumn flu and Covid vaccinations

covid 19 vaccines research topics

Former Covid medical officer Van-Tam takes role at vaccine maker Moderna

covid 19 vaccines research topics

Covid booster jabs could go on sale privately in UK in 2024

covid 19 vaccines research topics

Steve Barclay ‘frustrated health officials by delaying vaccine programme signoff’

covid 19 vaccines research topics

Doctor died from rare reaction to AstraZeneca Covid jab, UK coroner rules

Most viewed.

Advertisement

Supported by

Covid Vaccine Side Effects: 4 Takeaways From Our Investigation

Thousands of Americans believe they experienced rare but serious side effects. But confirming a link is a difficult task.

  • Share full article

A close-up view of a blue tray of Covid-19 shots and bandages on a blue table.

By Apoorva Mandavilli

Apoorva Mandavilli spent more than a year talking to dozens of experts in vaccine science, policymakers and people who said they had experienced serious side effects after receiving a Covid-19 vaccine.

Soon after their arrival in late December 2020, the Covid-19 vaccines turned the pandemic around and opened a path back to normalcy. They prevented about 14.4 million deaths worldwide, according to one estimate .

In a small percentage of people, they also produced side effects.

Over the course of more than a year, The New York Times talked to 30 people who said they had been harmed by Covid vaccines. Their symptoms may turn out to be unrelated to the shots. But they — along with more than a dozen experts — felt federal officials are not doing enough to investigate their complaints.

All vaccines carry some risk of side effects. More than 270 million Americans received about 677 million doses of the Covid vaccines, and even rare side effects — occurring, say, in just 0.001 percent of patients — might mean thousands of recipients were affected.

Indeed, more than 13,000 have submitted claims to a government fund that compensates people for Covid vaccine injuries. So far, however, only a dozen people have been compensated, nearly all of them for a heart problem caused by the vaccines.

Here are four takeaways from our investigation.

For most people, the benefits of Covid vaccines outweigh any risks.

Even the best vaccines and drugs have some side effects. That does not negate their benefits, nor does it suggest that people should stop taking them.

The rotavirus vaccine, for example, is an unmitigated success, but it can lead to intussusception — a life-threatening condition in which the intestine folds in on itself — in about 0.02 percent of children who are vaccinated.

Some side effects caused by the Covid vaccines may be equally rare. Researchers in Hong Kong analyzed that country’s health records and found that about seven of every million doses of Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine triggered a bout of shingles serious enough to require hospitalization.

Other side effects are slightly more common. The Covid vaccines may lead to myocarditis, or inflammation of the heart, in one of every 10,000 adolescent males. (Myocarditis is one of the four serious side effects acknowledged by federal health officials.)

Deaths from the vaccines are vanishingly rare , despite claims from some conspiracy theorists that vaccines have led to a spike in mortality rates.

More intensive analysis may indicate that in some groups, like young men, the benefit of Covid shots may no longer outweigh the risks. But for the majority of Americans, the vaccines continue to be far safer than contracting Covid itself.

Federal surveillance has found some side effects but may miss others.

To detect problems with vaccines, federal agencies rely on multiple databases. The largest, the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, is useful for generating hypotheses, but contains unverified accounts of harms. Other databases combine electronic health records and insurance claims.

These systems spotted blood-clotting problems associated with the Johnson & Johnson vaccine and a potential risk of stroke after mRNA immunizations, which is still under investigation. But federal researchers trailed Israeli scientists in picking up myocarditis as a problem among young men.

The American health care system is fragmented, with medical records stored by multiple companies that do not collaborate. Electronic health records do not all describe symptoms the same way, making comparisons difficult. Insurance claims databases may have no record of shots administered at mass vaccination sites.

Federal systems may also miss symptoms that defy easy description or diagnosis.

Proving vaccination led to an illness is complicated.

Among the hundreds of millions of Americans who were immunized against Covid, there were deaths, heart attacks, strokes, miscarriages and autoimmune illnesses. How to distinguish illnesses caused by the vaccine from those that would have happened anyway?

The rarer the condition, the harder it is to answer this question.

Merely judging by the timing — the appearance of a particular problem after vaccination — can be misleading. Most famously, childhood vaccines were mistakenly linked to autism because the first noticeable features often coincided with the immunization schedule.

Serious side effects may first turn up in animal studies of vaccines. But few such studies were possible given the nation’s desperate timeline in 2020. Clinical trials of the vaccines were intended to test their effectiveness, but they were far from big enough to detect side effects that may occur only in a few people per million doses.

Most independent studies of side effects have not been large enough to detect rare events, nor to exclude their possibility; others have looked only for a preset list of symptoms and might have missed the rare outliers.

An expert panel convened by the National Academies concluded in April that for most side effects, there was not enough data to accept or reject a link to Covid vaccination.

Understanding the full range of side effects may take years.

Federal health officials acknowledge four major side effects of Covid vaccines — not including the temporary injection site pain, fever and malaise that may accompany the shots.

But in federal databases, thousands of Americans have reported that Covid vaccines caused ringing in the ears, dizziness, brain fog, sharp fluctuations in blood pressure and heart rate, new or relapsed autoimmune conditions , hives , vision problems , kidney disorders, tingling , numbness and a loss of motor skills.

Some studies have examined reports of side effects and largely concluded that there was no link . Closer scrutiny may reveal that many, perhaps most, of the other reported side effects are unrelated to immunization. Most of them are also associated with Covid , and may be the result of undiagnosed infections. But without in-depth studies, it is impossible to be sure, experts said.

Apoorva Mandavilli is a reporter focused on science and global health. She was a part of the team that won the 2021 Pulitzer Prize for Public Service for coverage of the pandemic. More about Apoorva Mandavilli

U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS A lock ( Lock A locked padlock ) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

COVID-19 Vaccination Public Education Campaign Saved Thousands of Lives, Billions of Dollars

Study found vaccine campaign saved $90 for every $1 spent 

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) COVID-19 Vaccination Public Education Campaign, We Can Do This, resulted in an estimated$731.9 billion in societal benefits due to averted illness and related costs, resulting in a nearly $90 return in societal benefits for every $1 spent, according to research published today in the American Journal of Preventive Medicine .

“At the height of the pandemic, we launched one of the largest public health education campaigns in U.S. history to encourage and educate Americans on the steps they could take to get and stay healthy. We now have research to confirm the COVID-19 Public Education Campaign, We Can Do This, was an indispensable part of efforts to vaccinate people and protect them from COVID-19, saving thousands of lives and billions of dollars in the process,” said HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra. “HHS is responsible for protecting the health and well-being of all Americans. As stewards of the public’s money, we wanted to deliver impact for the American people in the most efficient and effective ways. This confirms we did exactly that. We will no doubt use what we learned in this campaign to further improve our public health efforts in the future.”

The study showed the Campaign encouraged 22.3 million people to complete their primary COVID-19 vaccination series between April 2021 and March 2022, preventing nearly 2.6 million SARS-CoV-2 infections, the virus that causes COVID-19, including nearly 244,000 hospitalizations, during the time period that the highly contagious Delta and Omicron virus variants were spreading.

Preventing these outcomes resulted in societal benefits to the U.S. of $740.2 billion, accounting for such factors as medical expenses, wages, and other costs that people and institutions would have incurred in the absence of the Campaign. In comparison, the Campaign cost $377 million, with an additional $7.9 billion spent to vaccinate 22.3 million people in that time period.

According to the study, from April 2021 to March 2022, the net benefit of the Campaign—how much money these efforts saved minus how much they cost—came to $731.9 billion, translating to a return on investment of $89.54 for every $1 spent.

In April 2021, HHS launched the We Can Do This Public Education Campaign to increase COVID-19 vaccine confidence and uptake in the U.S. The Campaign, one of the largest public health education efforts in U.S. history, promoted COVID-19 vaccine uptake using integrated, multichannel, research-based strategies. It aimed to reach 90% of adults in the United States at least once per quarter, with even more intense outreach to high-risk communities. The Campaign featured more than 7,000 ads in 14 languages, with many culturally tailored and geographically targeted to specific minority, racial, and ethnic audiences. A multimedia approach bolstered widespread engagement with trusted messengers, partner organizations, and influencers who delivered persuasive, accurate, and culturally relevant information to vaccine-hesitant populations.

The benefit-cost study of We Can Do This is the only research study to date that looked at the contributions of a media campaign to encourage people to get COVID-19 vaccines during the pandemic emergency period. The newly published study is unique in that it demonstrates that the nationwide media Campaign was an indispensable component of the nation’s efforts to vaccinate people and protect them from COVID-19. It also adds to the body of evidence that shows the Campaign’s impact on behavior change.

“This research confirms the benefits of public health campaigns as part of a multi-layered response to a public health crisis and to the effort to provide accurate information to the American public,” said May Malik, Senior Advisor for Public Education Campaigns at HHS.

To evaluate the benefits and costs of the national Campaign, researchers used real-world data from multiple sources, such as data on COVID-19 outcomes, uptake of COVID-19 vaccines, and vaccine effectiveness, from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), along with survey data collected to measure the Campaign’s effects on vaccination behaviors over time.

The findings can help inform the Federal response to future public health threats. As part of a multipronged approach to addressing public health crises, this study demonstrates the return on investment possible from public education campaigns given their effectiveness in building vaccine confidence and supporting healthy behavior change.

The study, Benefit-Cost Analysis of the HHS COVID-19 Campaign: April 2021–March 2022 , was conducted by researchers from HHS Office of the Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs and Fors Marsh in Arlington, Virginia.

Sign Up for Email Updates

Receive the latest updates from the Secretary, Blogs, and News Releases

Subscribe to RSS

Receive latest updates

Subscribe to our RSS

Related News Releases

Hhs, dhs, and fema announce completion of multi-year review of state efforts to provide language access during the covid-19 public health emergency, readout of hhs secretary becerra’s meeting with pharmacy ceos on covid-19 therapeutics commercialization, readout of hhs meeting with health care providers on covid-19 therapeutics commercialization, related blog posts.

HHS Blog thumbnail

Calling innovators! HHS Long COVID Healthathon launches with $25K in prizes

Reflections from the deputy director of the hhs office of long covid research and practice.

HHS Blog thumbnail

Driving Long COVID Innovation with Health+ Human-Centered Design

Media inquiries.

For general media inquiries, please contact  [email protected] .

COMMENTS

  1. COVID-19 Vaccines

    By the end of November 2021, scientists estimate that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines had prevented at least 1 million deaths, 10 million hospitalizations, and 36 million SARS-CoV-2 infections in the United States. Sometimes people who are fully vaccinated get a breakthrough infection, meaning that they test positive for SARS-CoV-2 or become ill with ...

  2. Covid-19 Vaccines

    The protective effects of vaccination and prior infection against severe Covid-19 are reviewed, with proposed directions for future research, including mucosal immunity and intermittent vaccine boo...

  3. COVID-19 Topics

    Research Initiatives mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines Timeline ... Open Funding Opportunities NIH Coronavirus Funding Researcher Resources COVID-19 Topics Vaccines Treatments Clinical Trials ... Treatments . The latest on treatments and other therapies for COVID-19. Vaccines. Questions and answers about COVID-19 vaccine guidelines, development, and ...

  4. Inside the story about the research and development of COVID-19 vaccines

    1. Safety and immunogenicity study of 2019-nCoV vaccine (mRNA-1273) for prophylaxis of SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19) This clinical trial is designed to assess the safety, reactogenicity, and immunogenicity of mRNA-1273. It encodes for a full-length, prefusion stabilized spike (S) protein of SARS-CoV-2.

  5. Decades in the Making: mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines

    Two U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved mRNA vaccines for COVID-19 have saved millions of lives. These vaccines were developed with NIH support and research on a protein found on SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. Clinical trials for the COVID-19 vaccines in people were established in what seemed like record time. But in reality, more than 50 years of public and private ...

  6. Efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines: From clinical trials to real life

    Despite questions remain about the impact of virus variants and the duration of the immune response, messenger RNA (mRNA)-based and adenoviral vectored vaccines have demonstrated an overall efficacy from 70 to 95% in both phase III trials and real life. In addition, all these vaccines also reduce the severe forms of the disease and might ...

  7. Comprehensive literature review on COVID-19 vaccines and role of SARS

    As the research is rapidly expanding, we have looked at the association between pregnancy and COVID-19 vaccinations, in addition to the current reviews on the mixing of vaccines. ... The BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine developed by BioNTech and Pfizer is a lipid nanoparticle-formulated, ... Studies on these topics are rapidly being conducted and ...

  8. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19): Vaccine research and development

    Now, given the urgent need for COVID-19 vaccines, unprecedented financial investments and scientific collaborations are changing how vaccines are developed. This means that some of the steps in the research and development process have been happening in parallel, while still maintaining strict clinical and safety standards.

  9. COVID vaccines and safety: what the research says

    There is no question that the current vaccines are effective and safe. The risk of severe reaction to a COVID-19 jab, say researchers, is outweighed by the protection it offers against the deadly ...

  10. COVID-19 vaccines: Current evidence and considerations

    Abstract. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is a global crisis, with devastating health, business and social impacts. Vaccination is a safe, simple, and effective way of protecting a person against COVID-19. By the end of August 2021, only 24.6% of the world population has received two doses of a COVID-19 vaccine.

  11. COVID-19 vaccines

    COVID-19 vaccines. Everyone, everywhere, should have access to COVID-19 vaccines. Major progress has been made with the COVID-19 vaccination response, and it is critical to continue the progress, particularly for those most at risk of disease. WHO recommends a simplified single-dose regime for primary immunization for most COVID-19 vaccines ...

  12. Promoting Covid-19 Vaccination in the United States

    Any successful marketing strategy will be multifaceted. 9,10 Consumer research and behavioral economics suggest 12 key strategies for an effective vaccine-promotion effort ().Not all strategies ...

  13. Vaccine effectiveness against emerging COVID-19 variants using digital

    Varrelman et al. use participatory surveillance data to develop a method to identify changes in vaccine effectiveness and disease symptomatology. Using data from the COVID-19 pandemic, they ...

  14. Ground-breaking study reveals how COVID-19 vaccines prevent severe

    Despite the global success of COVID-19 vaccination campaigns, concerns remain around the continued spread of this disease including in vaccinated individuals. For this reason, researchers at the Oxford Vaccine Group conducted an extensive investigation into the human immune response to COVID-19, in both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals.

  15. What Americans think about COVID-19 vaccines

    Overall, 62% of U.S. adults say that the benefits of COVID-19 vaccines outweigh the risks, while a much smaller share think the risks outweigh the benefits (36%). Even so, when asked to rate the preventative health benefits of COVID-19 vaccines from very high to very low, fewer than half of Americans (45%) rate the benefits as high.

  16. Coronavirus (COVID-19)

    How Americans View the Coronavirus, COVID-19 Vaccines Amid Declining Levels of Concern. Just 20% of the public views the coronavirus as a major threat to the health of the U.S. population and only 10% are very concerned about getting a serious case themselves. In addition, a relatively small share of U.S. adults (28%) say they've received an ...

  17. How Americans View the Coronavirus, COVID-19 Vaccines Amid Declining

    Pew Research Center conducted this study to understand Americans' views of the coronavirus and COVID-19 vaccines. For this analysis, we surveyed 10,133 U.S. adults from Feb. 7 to 11, 2024. Everyone who took part in the survey is a member of the Center's American Trends Panel (ATP), an online survey panel that is recruited through national ...

  18. COVID-19: Vaccine and Vaccination Communication

    The aim of this Research Topic is to explore COVID-19 related vaccine and vaccination communication from a variety of perspectives in order to inform public policy and develop effective communication strategies. In particular, we encourage submissions addressing, but not limited to, the following topics:

  19. Vaccine Safety Publications

    CDC COVID-19 Response Team Allergic Reactions Including Anaphylaxis After Receipt of the First Dose of Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine— United States, December 21, 2020-January 10, 2021 MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021 Jan 22:70(4);125-129.. On December 18, 2020, FDA issued an Emergency Use Authorization for Moderna COVID-19 vaccine to prevent COVID-19. As of January 10, 2021, over 4 million first ...

  20. Predicting COVID-19 Vaccination Intentions to Inform Evidence-Based

    Outcome measures included self-reported vaccination intention and behavior. Predictor measures, rooted in theories of social and behavioral science that have been found to be predictive of vaccination outcomes (i.e., Reasoned Action Approach, Extended Parallel Process Model), included perceived severity and susceptibility, negative affect, instrumental and affective attitudes, social norms ...

  21. Home

    Find COVID-19 datasets, data tools, and publications to use in research. EXPLORE COVID-19 DATA. Learn how NIH is supporting research in COVID-19 testing, treatments, and vaccines.

  22. COVID-19 Vaccination Acceptance and Its Associated Factors Among a

    1 Department of Pharmacy, Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; 2 Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan; Background: The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is a major threat to public health and has had a significant impact on all aspects of life. An effective vaccine is the most anticipated ...

  23. Vaccines

    Background: The escalating complexity of the COVID-19 epidemic underscores the need for heightened attention to booster vaccinations. This study aims to examine the changing trend in the public's intention to receive the second COVID-19 booster vaccination over time and the associated factors following the COVID-19 policy optimization in China. Method: Eight cross-sectional surveys utilizing ...

  24. Study reveals how COVID-19 vaccines prevent severe disease

    A study by scientists at the University of Oxford, has unveiled crucial insights into the way that COVID-19 vaccines mitigate severe illness in those who have been vaccinated. Topics Conditions

  25. Effectiveness of COVID‐19 vaccines: findings from real world studies

    Community‐based studies in five countries show consistent strong benefits from early rollouts of COVID‐19 vaccines. By the beginning of June 2021, almost 11% of the world's population had received at least one dose of a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) vaccine. 1 This represents an extraordinary scientific and logistic achievement ...

  26. Scientists create vaccine with potential to protect against future

    Tests in mice showed that the vaccine induced a broad immune response to coronaviruses, including Sars-Cov-1, the pathogen that caused the 2003 Sars outbreak, even though proteins from that virus ...

  27. Current and Future Perspectives on the COVID-19 Vaccine: A

    Therefore, the current research aims to draw the present and future perspective of the COVID-19 vaccine studies by identifying the most important actors and their scientific fields, trends in research topics, and relationships between different entities. Some studies by [ 2, 14, 18, 19] in particular, examined the field of COVID-19 vaccines ...

  28. Covid Vaccine Side Effects: 4 Takeaways From Our Investigation

    Soon after their arrival in late December 2020, the Covid-19 vaccines turned the pandemic around and opened a path back to normalcy. They prevented about 14.4 million deaths worldwide, according ...

  29. Study suggests staying current with COVID-19 vaccinations helps combat

    A COVID-19 vaccine is prepped at an OHSU clinic. New research from OHSU reveals a strong immune response to an updated vaccine in the fall of 2023, suggesting a clear benefit for people receiving updated vaccinations regularly, especially older adults and those with underlying medical conditions. (OHSU/Christine Torres Hicks)

  30. COVID-19 Vaccination Public Education Campaign Saved Thousands of Lives

    Study found vaccine campaign saved $90 for every $1 spent The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' (HHS) COVID-19 Vaccination Public Education Campaign, We Can Do This, resulted in an estimated$731.9 billion in societal benefits due to averted illness and related costs, resulting in a nearly $90 return in societal benefits for every $1 spent, according to research published today in ...