importance of labor relations essay

Open Access is an initiative that aims to make scientific research freely available to all. To date our community has made over 100 million downloads. It’s based on principles of collaboration, unobstructed discovery, and, most importantly, scientific progression. As PhD students, we found it difficult to access the research we needed, so we decided to create a new Open Access publisher that levels the playing field for scientists across the world. How? By making research easy to access, and puts the academic needs of the researchers before the business interests of publishers.

We are a community of more than 103,000 authors and editors from 3,291 institutions spanning 160 countries, including Nobel Prize winners and some of the world’s most-cited researchers. Publishing on IntechOpen allows authors to earn citations and find new collaborators, meaning more people see your work not only from your own field of study, but from other related fields too.

Brief introduction to this section that descibes Open Access especially from an IntechOpen perspective

Want to get in touch? Contact our London head office or media team here

Our team is growing all the time, so we’re always on the lookout for smart people who want to help us reshape the world of scientific publishing.

Home > Books > Issues of Human Resource Management

Labor Relations: Contemporary Issues in Human Resource Management

Submitted: 16 October 2016 Reviewed: 17 March 2017 Published: 07 June 2017

DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.68625

Cite this chapter

There are two ways to cite this chapter:

From the Edited Volume

Issues of Human Resource Management

Edited by Ladislav Mura

To purchase hard copies of this book, please contact the representative in India: CBS Publishers & Distributors Pvt. Ltd. www.cbspd.com | [email protected]

Chapter metrics overview

4,098 Chapter Downloads

Impact of this chapter

Total Chapter Downloads on intechopen.com

Total Chapter Views on intechopen.com

In this chapter, we examine the labor relations through the role of trade unions, collective bargaining, wages and benefits across the European Union. We conclude that labor relations have a direct influence on the labor market, designing the lines for taking decisions in organizations, but also, by governments. Our argumentation explains the relationship between employers and employees through legal rights (established by the law), negotiation process, collective bargaining, ‘actors’ in this process, wage and benefits, social and security protection.

• negotiation
• collective bargaining
• trade unions
• wages and benefits
• social protection
• European countries

Author Information

Ana‐maria bercu *.

• Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Romania

Ana Iolanda Vodă

• Department of Interdisciplinary Research—Humanities and Social Sciences, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, Romania

*Address all correspondence to: [email protected]

1. Introduction

Today’s workers want more than a salary, and they want additional benefits to enrich their lives, to increase their importance at workplace and to be valuable for the organization. The labor relations are more than a static interpretation of contract between an employee and an employer. Means a sum of connections between skills, abilities, values and opportunities at work. Employee role in organization has grown in importance and variety over the time. For them, the labor relations become a way to live, to self‐development and to obtain recognition. The employers realize that to keep motivated and committed people in organization need more than a salary. It is about benefits in financial terms, but, also, talking about safety at work, security, rights and duties. Benefits are necessary to assure the job satisfaction.

Labor relations are the term used to define the process between employers and employees, management and unions in order to make decisions in organizations. The decisions taken refer to wages, working conditions, hours of work, and safety at work, security and grievances. Why is an important topic for Human Resource Management?

It is know that wage and other economic benefits for employees represent not only their current income, but also the potential for economic growth and the ability to live comfortable during the active life and after the retirement. Wage is considered as an important economic variable for competitiveness. The world economic crises have shown that the role of wages in sustaining demand in a context of stagnant growth and very low inflation is very important and needs a particular attention from the part of management boards, government and employees, through their representants.

Wages and benefits received by employees for their work represent the compensation or ‘the price paid by employers for their workers services’. This requires a specific analyze due to the fact that the work is realized under a contract and propose and active commitment of the workers [ 1 ]. From this perspective, the wage issues require a specific analytical framework because the work cannot be separated by the human beings, and according to the several studies, the level of payment and economic benefits of employees are positively related to employee satisfaction at work.

Wage and salary are considered as most important and difficult collective bargaining issue. In the employment relationships, the collective bargaining process has several implication at individual levels, for the employers, as a determinant of production and labor costs, among employers on the competition market, between employers and employees as a distribution of added value, for employees, as a key factor for their income and sustainability on a dynamic labor market, among employees, expressing the solidarity through the ‘wage floors’ applying to different group of workers at a given bargaining level.

The parties could negotiate the total package of wage and benefits in individual terms or in collective terms, but reflecting the aim of labor contract: The employees must be paid for their work, and the employers must receive qualitative work.

Also, the negotiations reflect the interest of all the parties involved: managers, employees through their representants and government.

In this chapter, we examine the labor relations through the role of trade unions, collective bargaining, wages and benefits across the European Union. We conclude that labor relations have a direct influence on the labor market, designing the lines for taking decisions in organizations, but also, by governments. Our argumentation explains the relationship between employers and employees through legal rights (established by the law), negotiation process, collective bargaining, ‘actors’ in this process, wage and benefits, social and security protection.

For the policy‐makers to find a balance between assuring the rights and promote competitiveness in their organization, also to make their employers more productive is a key priority, drawing on a range of policy measure. Important aspects cover wage settings, collective bargaining, employees’ representativeness, safety and security needs, working hours and contracts. All these influence the policies and the labor market flexibility. The employees find satisfaction in being able to perform task adequately and are more willing to perform a better job, increasing the involvement at workplace and become more implies [ 2 – 5 ].

2. Data and methodology

The necessary data to conduct our research were collected from various statistics, official reports, databases of the worker‐participation.eu and ICTWSS: Database on Institutional Characteristics of Trade Unions, Wage Setting, State Intervention and Social Pacts . The analyzed countries are EU‐28, grouped in five analytical clusters, defined by European Commission as industrial regimes [ 5 ], namely: (a) North Europe: Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden; (b) Central‐West Europe: Austria, Belgium, Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and Slovenia; (c) South Europe: France, Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain; (d) West Europe: Cyprus, Ireland, Malta and the United Kingdom; (e) Central‐Eastern Europe: Bulgaria; Czech Republic; Estonia; Latvia; Lithuania; Hungary; Poland; Romania and Slovakia.

The main indicators taken into account are collective bargaining coverage, trade union density, collective bargaining coordination index and collective bargaining centralization. The chosen period was 2013–2014 for the analyzed countries, except for Portugal were no data were available for collective bargaining centralization. Also, for Cyprus, we used the data available only for the south part of the county.

Table 1 presents the descriptive statistics for included variables, the number of analyzed countries, the minimum and maximum values for the chosen indicators, the mean and standard deviation.

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics.

Source: Authors’ calculation.

For the sample of 28 EU countries, we studied the bivariate correlations between the variables, using Pearson correlation coefficient and the associated p values. A value lower than 0.05 dictates the significance of the used variables, while the correlation coefficient values are a number from −1 to 1, which determines whether the sets of data are related. The closer to 1 the more confident we are of a positive linear correlation and closer to −1 the more confident we are of a negative linear correlation. The person correlation values closer to zero indicate the lack of any relationship between the variables.

For collective bargaining coverage and trade union density, we calculated the mean for the chosen period based on the data provided by worker‐participation.eu, while, for collective bargaining coordination index, we used the estimated index values based on a five‐point scale [ 6 ]. Collective Bargaining Centralization is an indicator calculated by Visser as: Level—(Frequency or scope of additional enterprise bargaining ( FAEB= 0,3 ¯ ) + Articulation of enterprise bargaining ( AEB= 0,3 ¯ ) )/4(=max value) + (AEB + Derogation ( DER= 0,3 ¯ ) − 1 )/5( = max value), and the index scores are between 0 and 3, in which ‘0’ represents the lower value and ‘3’ the higher value [ 6 ].

3. Wage systems and institutions: unions and management wage concerns

The wage systems and institutions that served the issue are deepening linked by the market, legislation and industrial relations. The market is the factor, which reflects the macro‐ and microequilibrium between the labor force and state, the differences in labor and cost productivity. The legislation has the reglementation role for work and the conditions to made it and put into provisions the relationships between employers, employees and government. Setting the minimum wage is a requirement for a special category of workers, and an objective for the policy of governments.

The total economic package should be negotiated between employers and employees by their representants to estimate accurately the total cost of the contract of work, in term of salary and benefits. The collective bargaining has different dimensions and indicates, in a general way, how the conditions and requirements of the work interact with legal and market regulation. Even if the collective bargaining is independently and autonomous than the legislation, the results of the negotiations should be in accordance with the legal provisions.

The collective bargaining process is the actual negotiations carried out by the parties to reach an agreement. Artful use of this process can improve the relationship between an employer and employees and has as result a contract for both parties [ 7 , 8 ].

The bargaining process implies the representative of employees, the management representatives. Successful negotiations depend on the knowledge and skills of the negotiators, which should prepare their side’s interests in the bargaining issues. They should make realist proposals and within the framework of negotiations. The bargaining items could be: mandatory, as rates of pay, wages, hours of employment, overtime pay, holidays, pensions, insurance benefits, employee security, job performance, management‐union relationship, subcontracting or relocating union members’ work, medical exams and permissive, as indemnity bounds, preferential hiring, pension benefits off retired employees, use of union label, employer child care, plant closings.

Concerning these issues, many changes have been noticed in industrial relations over the last decade due to long‐term development trends caused by an ever‐changing socio‐economic environment. The trends shifts occur especially since the beginning of the recent economic and financial crisis and their impact varied across European Union Member states.

In the table, we group the EU member states in five analytical clusters, defined by the European Commission as industrial relations regimes or arrangements: (a) North Europe: Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden; (b) Central‐West Europe: Austria, Belgium, Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and Slovenia; (c) South Europe: France, Greece, Italy, Portugal and Spain; (d) West Europe: Cyprus, Ireland, Malta and the United Kingdom; (e) Central‐Eastern Europe: Bulgaria; Czech Republic; Estonia; Latvia; Lithuania; Hungary; Poland; Romania and Slovakia. These countries are grouped in relation to some collective features related to union density, bargaining coverage rates, employee representativeness and role of the state and social partners in the industrial relations [ 5 ].

• The data is available only for the south part of the island, officially recognized by the state government.

The relative change in employees and trade unions trends is a consequence of the recent economic and financial crises impact. These recent developments can be explained through factors like low level of employment of young people, part‐time hiring, together with the higher number of fixed‐term contracts which dropped the number of unionized employees since 2008 in many European countries. Recent developments appear to have slowed, at least for the moment, the downfall of the trade union density.

In European industrial relations or arrangements, collective bargaining represents a fundamental element through which employers and their organizations, on one side, and trade unions, on the other, can typically determine wages and working conditions, and relations between involved parties. Collective bargaining coverage represents ‘an indicator of the extent to which the terms of workers’ employment are influenced by collective negotiation. It is calculated as the number of employees covered by the collective agreement divided by the total number of wage and salary‐earners’ [ 10 ]. The contrast between the European Member states is particularly strong with regard to collective bargaining coverage. In North, Central‐West and South Europe, the coverage rate is above 60%, with the exception of Luxemburg. Between West Europe and Central‐Eastern Europe, only Malta has a coverage rate above 60%. The lower collective bargaining coverage is registered in Poland (10–15%) and the United Kingdom (29%). In the literature, coverage rates are correlated with the employers’ density rates, and in several countries like Germany and the Netherlands, the two concepts are connected and associated one with other. As Carley [ 11 ] noted ‘in these countries, employers who are member of employers’ organization are generally bound by collective agreements. In other cases, coverage rates go beyond employers’ density rates due to statutory extension procedures that are supported and legislated by governments. This is the case in France, where statutory extension compensates for low trade union membership levels [ 11 ].

Table 2 also shows that the level at which collective barraging takes place also differs across EU member states. For instance, while for North, Central‐West and South Europe groups, the sector is the main place where negotiations between the involved parts occur, in the West (with the exception of Cyprus) and Central‐East Europe, different standards are applied and the bargaining processes between employees and trade unions are at company level. Although this is the overall trend in the analyzed groups, some of the EU countries have a mixed level approach (Luxemburg, the Netherlands, Slovakia), and collective bargaining takes place at both industry and company level or other different styles are adopted (in Belgium, negotiations take place at the national level, while in France and Spain, we have three levels procedure: national, industry and company/organization).

Table 2.

Industrial regimes across Europe.

In calculating collective bargaining coverage for Poland, we took the average mean, based on the date provided by http://www.worker‐participation.eu/National‐Industrial‐Relations/Countries/Sweden/Trade‐Unions. Available from Refs. [ 12 , 13 ].

Overall other representatives are not excluded.

No category: Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Romania and yes: state‐owned companies for the rest.

In the majority of the European member states, the employee representation at the workplace is through unions, except the Central‐West area where the workplace structures are represented by works councils (with the exception of Slovenia dominated by union structure, and Belgium and France with both unions and works council).

North Europe, Central‐West and South Europe have employee representation at board level, with the exception of Belgium (not featured at board level, apart from a handful of publicly owned organizations) and Italy (no right for employee representation at board level although a proposal have been included in the Jobs Acts 2002 legislation). In the West Europe, just Ireland accepts employee representation but only in the state‐owned sector. In the Central‐Eastern Group, the extent of employee representation at board level is divided between the countries: While in Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia employee representation do exist, in Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and Romania, there is no participation at board level, although is some situations employee representatives can have a consultative role in shareholders’ meetings.

Moreover, the role played by social partners in public policy‐making is different across the five analyzed groups. In the North and Central‐West Europe corporatist clusters, the implication of employers’ organization and unions in designing policy proposals is extensive, and their connection with political actors is highly institutionalized. In Western countries, although social policy‐makers are constantly engaged in social and economic debates, not always their beliefs are reflected in policy outcomes. Distinct practices occur in the other groups involved in the analyses. For instance, in South Europe, the role of social partners in policy‐making depends mostly on the individual governments’ willingness of inclusion. Despite the fact that the engaged policy‐makers are formally involved in the decision‐making policy, the government has the freedom to oppose their participation. In the Central and Eastern Europe, an effective social partnership can be undermined by organization politicization which ‘combined with the overall weakness of organized interest representation, social partners’ politicization seriously limits their influence in the policy‐making sphere’ [ 14 ].

The role of the state and its involvement in collective bargaining differs significantly across EU countries. In North, Central‐West and West Europe, state interventions are limited and in the latter region quite rare. In Southern European countries, although there exist strong pressures toward less state regulation regarding collective bargaining and working conditions, the state assumes an almost exclusive role in governing change, particularly in the recent economic context. Regulatory amendments framework, alongside clientelistic relations with social partners, has mainly limited the governing capacity of trade unions and employer organizations over industrial relations. In Central‐Eastern Europe, the collective bargaining is dominated by the government; meanwhile, the existing legislation remains the only instrument in settling work relations disputes.

In Table 3 , the correlations between different institutions of wage bargaining are described. Pearson correlation coefficients demonstrate the positive relationships among all the variables and strong association between: collective bargaining coverage with coordination (0.746) and centralization (0.774), among trade union density with collective bargaining coordination (0.595), and the both way and powerful relationship between coordination index and centralization. Strong actors are interrelated with centralized and coordinated institutions and high rates for bargaining coverage; meanwhile, fragile and weak players are connected with low levels of coordination and de‐centralization.

Table 3.

Institutional features/linkages of wage bargaining.

Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (one‐tailed).

Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (one‐tailed).

Except Collective Bargaining Coverage and Trade Unions Density mentioned already in the analyses, two more indicators appear in Table 3 : Collective Bargaining Coordination Index (CBCI) and Collective Bargaining Centralization.

Collective bargaining coordination represents the combination between the level of bargaining and the range of sectors/organization that are bound by the collective agreement that succeeds negotiations . Collective bargaining coordination index (CBCI) was first developed by Kenworthy [ 15 ] and put in application with some small adjustments by authors like Visser which estimates the indexed values based on a five‐point scale [ 6 ]:

If maximum or minimum wage rates/increases based on: enforceable agreements between the peak association(s) of unions and employers affecting the whole economy or entire private sector with or without government involvement, and/or government imposition of wage schedule/freeze, with peace obligation, then a score of ‘5’ is set.

A ‘4’ score is set if wage norms or guidelines (recommendations) are based on centralized bargaining by peak associations with or without government involvement, informal centralization of industry‐level bargaining by a powerful and monopolistic union confederation and extensive, regularized pattern setting coupled with high degree of union concentration centralized bargaining by peak association(s), with or without government involvement, and/or government imposition of wage schedule/freeze, with peace obligation.

‘3’ score is set if negotiation guidelines are based on limited government involvement on central bargaining by major associations, informal centralization of bargaining at industry level and on government arbitration or intervention.

If we have a mixed sector and firm level bargaining with weak enforceability of industry agreements than a ‘2’ score is considered.

‘1’ for none of the above: fragmented wage bargaining, confined largely to individual firms or plants.

From Figure 1 , we can observe that 7.1% of the analyzed countries (Finland, Belgium) score a ‘5’ value, meaning that economy‐wide bargaining is based either on enforceable agreements or on government establishment of a wage schedule, freeze or ceiling. The larger percent (32.1%) is registered by those countries (Luxemburg, France, Greece, Malta, Cyprus, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Portugal and Romania), which have a mixed sector and firm level bargaining characterized by weak enforceability of industry agreements. In some cases (14.3%—Slovenia, Italy, Spain and Slovakia), the industry bargaining is characterized by an irregular pattern setting and narrow implication of central organization and limited freedoms for firms bargaining. A 21.4% of the analyzed countries register a ‘4’ value score, while 25% of them register fragmented wage bargaining, confined largely to individual firms or plants (Ireland, the UK, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary and Poland).

Figure 1.

Collective bargaining coordination index (CBCI), EU‐28. Source: Authors’ calculation.

Another used indicator, Collective Bargaining Centralization or the actual level of wage bargaining is calculated by Visser [ 6 ] as: Level—(Frequency or scope of additional enterprise bargaining ( FAEB= 0,3 ¯ ) + Articulation of enterprise bargaining ( AEB= 0,3 ¯ ) )/4( = max value) + (AEB + Derogation ( DER= 0,3 ¯ ) − 1 )/5( = max value) in which:

Frequency or scope of additional enterprise bargaining (FAEB) scores is between 0 and 3, in which ‘0’ represents the value for no additional enterprise, ‘1’ for rarity and, respectively, the frequency of additional enterprise bargaining in large firms and ‘3’ for its regularity.

Articulation of enterprise bargaining (AEB) equals with values from 0 , 3 ¯ , where ‘0’ score means that this concept does not apply; ‘1’ score is applied for disarticulated enterprise bargaining or if exits is reinforced by non‐union bodies; ‘2’ denotes that articulated bargaining is established under union control; and ‘3’ score is applied for disarticulated bargaining abolish or limited by sectoral agreements or existing law.

Derogation is also valued from 0 , 3 ¯ where, ‘0’ value stands for inversed favorability; ‘1’ for the linkage between agreements not subject to existing law; ‘2’ agreements are law enforced but under some conditions derogation is possible; ‘3’ favorability is anchored in law and strictly applied, no derogation [ 6 ].

In the North Europe, the higher is the collective bargaining coverage, the higher are the rates for coordination and centralization. From Central‐West Europe, Belgium has the higher value not only for coverage and density but also for collective bargaining coordination and centralization. The lowest values regarding collective bargaining coordination index (CBCI) and collective bargaining centralization are registered in most Central‐Eastern European countries ( Figures 1 and 2 ).

Figure 2.

Collective bargaining centralization, EU‐28. Source: Authors’ calculation. *** No data are available for Portugal on Collective Bargaining Centralization.

Regardless the importance of coverage and trade union density, the above described indicators, collective bargaining coordination index (CBCI) and collective bargaining centralization represent important assets in association of wage setting with economic and labor market performance measures. For instance, in the literature has been identified that as the extend of union coverage increases from less than one quarter to more than 70%, unemployment more than doubles, but bargaining coordination growth tend to compensate this effect [ 16 ].

The benefits systems are very important for the employees and employers, also. For the employee, the benefits represent that the income needs for necessities of life and is part of the economic package that can receive. For the employers, is a manner to motivate the people, to attract and to sustain their personal development in organizations, to retain the personal and to increase the productivity and competitively on the market.

Another important topic for the labor relations is job security. Today, the security at work became such important as wages and economic incomes and implies rights to work, to be promoted, to perform at work, to be fire or lay‐off.

According to industrial relations research, payment level is positively related to employee satisfaction [ 17 – 20 ], employees considering as a primary indicator of the organization goodwill. The unions’ objectives concerning the level of wages are direct related to negotiation. The unions’ goals in wage bargaining are to achieve a maximum level of wages and benefits for its members and to maintain the jobs as long as possible. Also, the bargaining process follows to assure a structure of wage scales between employees, negotiating for differences in working conditions, skills, seniority, age and job classification.

The establishment of a statutory or collectively agreed minimum wages is an important way of policy intervention in wage setting processes. Most of the European member states have different forms of regulations in determine minimum wages enforcement: statutory minimum wages and minimum wages established through collective agreements. In the first type, the minimum wage levels are fixed either by government legislation or through inter‐sectoral agreements at national level. In the second situation, the wages are established by consultation with social partners or tripartite agreements. Although these are the main minimal wages set approaches, different combinations of these forms of regulations are not excluded.

Visser sets a nine‐item scale to measure the minimum wage setting according to the following statements [ 6 ]: ‘0’ value score is set for non‐statutory minimum wage; ‘1’ represents the case scenario in which the minimal wages are set in consultation with social partners (sectoral collective agreements) or tripartite agreements; ‘2’ values are associated with the hypostasis that minimum wages are set by national agreements, along unions and employers; ‘3’ the minimum wage is established based on an extended agreement enforced by law or Ministerial decree; ‘4’ through tripartite negotiations, the minimal wages is decided; ‘5’ the government sets the national minimal wages, after voluntary tripartite consultations; ‘6’ minimum wage is adjust by judges or experts; ‘7’ the minimum wage is fixed by the state but in accordance with a indexed‐based minim wage; ‘8’ government established minimum wage without fixed rule.

In Figure 3 , we can observe that in the European Member states, there are some forms of establishing the minimum wage settings. In 46.1% of the analyzed countries, the minim wage is set by government and is based either on fixed rule (26.9%) or is bound by index‐based minimum wage (19.2%). In 19.3% of the cases, the minim wages are set by sectoral collective agreements or tripartite wage boards. Only in 11.5% of the countries, the minimum wage is set by national agreements between unions and employers, and in 7.7% of the cases is established based on an extended agreement enforced by law or Ministerial decree. A very small percentage of 3.8% remains for those European countries in which the government sets the national minimal wages, after voluntary tripartite consultations.

Figure 3.

Minimum wage setting in EU 28. Source: Authors’ representation. ***No data are available for Romania on minimum wage setting in 2014.

Human Resource Management is concerned with the development of both individuals and the organization in which they operate. Wage issues, economic benefits, job security and seniority, grievances and possibilities to resolve them are themes with a high impact at the level of organizations in terms of retaining good people, motivating and promoting, hiring and lay‐off. It is a complex world of relations in which people are involved. In this regard, the decisions take reflects the capability of management to respond to the complex requirements and to solve problems.

The chapter reflects the current issues and investigations in this complex and important field of research.

• 1. Akerlof GA. Labor contracts as partial gift exchange. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1982; 97 (4):543–569. DOI: 10.2307/1885099
• 2. Appelbaum E, Bailey T, Berg P, Kalleberg AL. Manufacturing Advantage: Why High Performance Work Systems Pay Off. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press; 2000. ISBN 978‐0‐8014‐8655‐5
• 3. Millette V, Gagné M. Designing volunteers’ tasks to maximize motivation, satisfaction and performance: The impact of job characteristics on volunteer engagement. Motivation and Emotion. 2008; 32 (1):11–22. DOI: 10.1007/s11031‐007‐9079‐4
• 4. Hepworth DH, Rooney RH, Rooney GD, Strom‐Gottfried K. Empowerment Series: Direct Social Work Practice: Theory and Skills. Canada: Nelson Education; 2016. ISBN 978‐0840028648
• 5. European Commission. Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities Unit F.1 Industrial Relations in Europe 2008. Industrial Relations & Industrial Change; 2009. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities ISBN: 978‐92‐79‐10105‐2. DOI: 10.2767/54876
• 6. Visser J. ICTWSS Database. version 5.0. Amsterdam: Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies AIAS; 2015. Open access database at: www.uva‐aias.net/nl/data/ictwss
• 7. Carrel MR, Heavrin C. Labor Relations and Collective Bargaining: Private and Public Sectors. 10th ed. Pearson Education, Inc., New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2003. p. 218
• 8. Jackson MP, Leopold JW, Tuck K, Shams SR. Decentralization of Collective Bargaining: An Analysis of Recent Experience in the UK. New York: Palgrave Macmillian; 1993. DOI: 10.1007/978‐1‐349‐22799‐0
• 9. Pedersini R, Welz C. Representativeness of the social partners in the European cross‐industry social dialogue. Eurofound: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Dublin; 2014. Available from: http://www.worker‐participation.eu/EU‐Social‐Dialogue/Latest‐developments/Representativeness‐of‐social‐partners‐in‐the‐European‐cross‐industry‐social‐dialogue [Accessed on 07 February, 2017]
• 10. OECD Employment Outlook. Chapter 5: Collective Bargaining: Levels and Coverage, OECD, 1994. p. 171. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/els/emp/2409993.pdf [Accessed on 07 February].
• 11. Carley M. Industrial relations in the EU Member States and candidate countries. European Industrial Relations Observatory; 2002. Available from: http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/eiro/2002/07/feature/tn0207104f.htm . [Accessed on 07 February, 2017]
• 12. Fulton L. Worker representation in Europe. Labour Research Department and ETUI. Produced with the assistance of the SEEurope Network; 2015. Available from: http://www.worker‐participation.eu/National‐Industrial‐Relations . [Accessed on 07 February, 2017]
• 13. Fulton L. Worker representation in Europe. Labour Research Department and ETUI. Produced with the assistance of the SEEurope Network; 2013. Available from: http://www.worker‐participation.eu/National‐Industrial‐Relations . [Accessed on 07 February, 2017]
• 14. Jagodziński R. Benchmarking Working Europe 2012; 2012. ISBN 978‐2‐87452‐262‐8. Available from https://works.bepress.com/romuald_jagodzinski/22/ [Accessed on 15 January, 2017]
• 15. Kenworthy L. Wage‐setting measures: A survey and assessment. World Politics. 2011; 54 (1):57–98.
• 16. Nickell S, Layard R. Labor market institutions and economic performance. In: Ashenfelter O, Card D, editors. Handbook of Labor Economics. Vol. 3. North‐Holland, Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1999. pp. 3029–3084. DOI: 10.1016/S1573‐4463(99)30037‐7
• 17. Berger C, Schwab D. Pay incentives and pay satisfaction. Industrial Relations. 1980; 19 (2):206. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468‐232X.1980.tb01090.x
• 18. Bettencourt LA, Brown SW. Contact employees: Relationships among workplace fairness, job satisfaction and prosocial service behaviors. Journal of Retailing. 1997; 73 (1):39–61. DOI: 10.1016/S0022‐4359(97)90014‐2
• 19. Judge TA, Piccolo RF, Podsakoff NP, Shaw JC, Rich BL. The relationship between pay and job satisfaction: A meta‐analysis of the literature. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 2010; 77 (2):157–167. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2010.04.002
• 20. Organisation for Economic Co‐operation and Development. Pensions at a Glance 2013: Retirement‐Income Systems in OECD and G20 Countries. 2013. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/pensions/publicpensions/OECDPensionsAtAGlance2013.pdf

© 2017 The Author(s). Licensee IntechOpen. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Continue reading from the same book

Published: 07 June 2017

By Lukáš Smerek

2590 downloads

By Andrea Olšovská and Marek Švec

2266 downloads

By Jesus Barrena-Martinez, Rocio Gomez-Molinero, Maca...

2039 downloads

IntechOpen Author/Editor? To get your discount, log in .

Discounts available on purchase of multiple copies. View rates

Local taxes (VAT) are calculated in later steps, if applicable.

Support: [email protected]

Home — Essay Samples — Sociology — Labor Unions — Why Unions Are Important: A Comprehensive Analysis

Why Unions Are Important: a Comprehensive Analysis

• Categories: Labor Unions

About this sample

Words: 768 |

Published: Sep 12, 2023

Words: 768 | Pages: 2 | 4 min read

Table of contents

The historical context of unions, benefits for workers, relevance in the modern labor landscape, challenges and the path forward.

• Higher Wages: Unionized workers typically earn higher wages than non-unionized counterparts. Collective bargaining allows workers to negotiate for competitive compensation packages, ensuring that their labor is adequately rewarded.
• Better Working Conditions: Unions advocate for safe and healthy working conditions. They hold employers accountable for maintaining safe workplaces, reducing the risk of workplace accidents and injuries.
• Job Security: Unions help protect workers from unfair terminations and layoffs. Through contractual agreements, unions ensure that workers can only be dismissed for just cause, providing job security and peace of mind.
• Healthcare and Benefits: Many unions negotiate comprehensive healthcare plans and benefits packages for their members, improving workers' access to medical care and financial security.
• Retirement Security: Unions often secure pension plans and retirement benefits, allowing workers to retire with dignity and financial stability.

Cite this Essay

To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

Let us write you an essay from scratch

• 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
• Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

Verified writer

• Expert in: Sociology

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

2 pages / 710 words

1 pages / 616 words

2 pages / 727 words

1 pages / 304 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Related Essays on Labor Unions

Labor unions have played a significant role in shaping the labor market and ensuring fair treatment for workers. They have been instrumental in advocating for better working conditions, fair wages, and employee rights. In this [...]

César Chávez stands out as a big name in American labor history. When you think of farmworkers' rights and social justice, his name pops up. But the story of his movement, with all its ups and downs, still catches the interest [...]

Unionization is a controversial topic that has been debated for decades. While some argue that unions provide workers with necessary protections and fair wages, others contend that unions can stifle economic growth and lead to [...]

In early years, labor unions were created to make reforms in the workplace. They lobbied for better working conditions, a minimum wage, and safety and health laws in the workplace and factories. The labor unions worked for these [...]

Unions are societies that are joined together by individuals with similar interests. The type of people in Unions ranges from teachers, police officers, factory workers, construction workers, etc. Unions in the United States [...]

Mormon’s have a lot of wives. That’s what always popped into my head when I thought about the religion of Mormonism. Most American’s don’t really know much, if anything, about this religion, even though it’s considered to be [...]

Related Topics

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Where do you want us to send this sample?

By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

Be careful. This essay is not unique

This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

Download this Sample

Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

Please check your inbox.

We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

• Instructions Followed To The Letter
• Deadlines Met At Every Stage
• Unique And Plagiarism Free

• Book a Speaker

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Vivamus convallis sem tellus, vitae egestas felis vestibule ut.

Error message details.

Reuse Permissions

Request permission to republish or redistribute SHRM content and materials.

The Rebirth of Labor Relations

A convergence of forces will make labor relations expertise—and HR professionals who have it—more valuable.

Among the surge of political, economic and demographic factors elevating the importance of labor relations skills, the most important motivation for HR professionals to strengthen their labor relations expertise might be personal.

Negotiating a collective bargaining agreement (CBA) with a single union representing 300 to 400 employees financially commits a company to millions of dollars during the course of the agreement, notes Andrea Terrillion, director of labor relations programs at Cornell University’s Industrial and Labor Relations School. "Nobody, not even the CEO, has the discretion to write that check on his or her own," she adds. "When HR folks talk about a seat at the table, there is nothing more ‘seat at the table’ than being intimately involved in these negotiations. … It’s a high-risk, high-stakes role."

Bernard Ruesgen, SPHR, corporate group HR manager, logistics and distribution centers, for Englewood, Colo.-based retailer Sports Authority, has worked on both sides of the bargaining table, and he agrees with Terrillion. "If you’re trying to get a seat at the big table without [labor relations expertise]," he asserts, "it’s not going to happen."

The coming months should present ample opportunity for HR professionals to punch their tickets to strategic decision-making tables. U.S. union membership, having declined annually for almost 50 years, posted its first increase in a generation during 2007.

Although the country’s 15.7 million union members account for only 12.1 percent of the country’s wage and salary workers, working with unions represents only part of the labor relations job description; the other part involves preventing unions from entering the company. Union activity is likely to increase, thanks to changes to the National Labor Relations Act, strenuous economic conditions, increasing globalization—and the retirement of veteran labor relations experts.

These drivers make labor relations expertise more important—and more valuable. Unfortunately, labor relations skills have never been in shorter supply among HR professionals.

Succession Planning Gap

Most labor relations experts and practitioners would agree with Ruesgen’s assessment that the concept of labor relations among many HR professionals is "mostly theoretical and limited to the practice of union avoidance."

The steady decrease in union membership since labor’s heyday in the late 1950s and early 1960s allowed company leaders to decrease the number of labor relations experts on staff. "In the past 15 years, labor relations has not been a core competency that HR professionals need to get ahead," Terrillion says.

Although about 75 universities—most notably Cornell and the University of Michigan—still offer some form of labor relations program, most human resources university curricula now emphasize general HR education and skills to a much greater degree, notes Theodore Raftas, SPHR, manager, workforce performance and employee relations for commercial vehicle maker AB Volvo in Allentown, Pa.

Raftas is currently working toward a master’s degree in human resource management. The program focuses on general HR topics, and "there is nowhere near as much labor relations content as I’d like to see," says Raftas, who spends about 90 percent of his work time on labor relations issues.

Many current labor relations experts have been on the job for close to two decades and are nearing retirement. Additionally, many labor relations departments sit by themselves and their employees interact relatively rarely with professionals in other HR functions.

"There’s not a lot of overlap," says Raftas, who, like Terrillion, notes that many labor relations departments are "segregated" either formally or informally. "That’s how it’s been throughout my career, and it continues today."

Terrillion notes that the expertise has traditionally been concentrated in the hands of very few people. "The knowledge has not been shared," she insists, "and, generally, there has been inadequate succession planning."

Card Check and Beyond

The importance of labor relations experience may soon soar, if all or part of the Employee Free Choice Act (EFCA) is signed into law. In its current form, the legislation was co-sponsored by then-Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois. During his campaign, the new president said he would sign the EFCA if and when it is passed by Congress.

The EFCA would amend the National Labor Relations Act to make it easier to form a union by replacing secret balloting with the signing of cards. Even if the legislation fails to pass, several other factors appear poised to boost union activity, including the recent economic crisis and an increasingly global and diverse workplace.

"When economic times are tough and people don’t think their employers are taking care of them, they reach out to a third party for help," notes Terrillion.

Some experts note that globalization has increased the need for HR professionals to learn more about labor relations. Labor relations practices differ around the world. As companies enter new overseas markets, they need to assess and understand those practices.

Kenyetta Haywood, SPHR, GPHR, director of compliance in the quality assurance department for the School District of Palm Beach County, Fla., believes there are increasing opportunities to glean best practices for labor relations from around the world.

"Global labor relations is a vital and evolving area of our profession," says Haywood, an employment law and labor law attorney who serves with Terrillion and Ruesgen on the Society for Human Resource Management’s (SHRM) Labor Relations Special Expertise Panel.

Transferable Skills

Labor relations veterans say that nothing provides more learning value than on-the-job experience; however, not all HR professionals are in a position to learn under the guidance of a mentor—or, in some cases, to gain exposure to labor relations before real-life opportunities arise.

Bernard Ruesgen, SPHR, corporate group HR manager, logistics and distribution centers, for Sports Authority, cut his teeth as a union business agent before being hired by a manager who had been his negotiating opponent. Ruesgen points out several "parallel" learning opportunities that can strengthen labor relations skills before the heat of battle:

Peer reviews. Union grievance procedures share several similarities with most peer review processes.

Grant writing. Volunteering for an agency that administers or applies for grants forces HR professionals to practice reading thick documents to gain an understanding of numerous boundaries and specifications. Labor contracts are bursting with boundaries and specifications.

Local board work. Ruesgen has served on the county planning commission, the city human relations commission and the county development board, among other civic volunteer commitments. The board work, he says, "teaches you to look at both sides and understand where these competing interests are." The frequently contentious nature of the interactions, he notes, helped him sharpen his labor relations skills while weighing competing interests against specific legal language.

Building Skills

Haywood recently drafted a report identifying the specific labor relations competencies HR professionals need as "essential and strategic business partners." She organizes the competencies into four broad categories:

Knowledge —background labor relations knowledge related to the private sector and the public sector at federal, state and local levels; and global issues.

Skills —specific skills such asleadership, negotiation, mediation, arbitration, the planning and developing of the CBA, interpreting and executing the CBA, analyzing and researching, interpersonal communications, and verbal and written communications.

Expertise —understanding of specific labor relations needs and challenges at an individual company given its special policies, CBA and business strategy.

Personal traits and values —competencies such as emotional intelligence, strategic thinking and planning, situational leadership and ethics, problem-solving and cultural competency.

When HR professionals develop these competencies, they "really become a strategic business partner," Haywood explains.

Other HR professionals with labor relations expertise cite similar competencies. "The HR practitioner’s role in labor relations is an exercise in advanced strategy," Ruesgen says, pointing to two "foundational competencies": the ability to research and interpret written material and the ability to provide informed advice and counsel to management on labor relations issues.

For his part, Raftas simplifies the necessary skills into three areas: understanding the business, preparing and negotiating. "You cannot have too much knowledge about U.S. labor law," he says. "And one of the key elements of bargaining starts with cultivating an understanding of the economics of how a business runs."

Lorraine Patterson, SPHR, another SHRM panel member and assistant division director of King County, Wash., distills the competencies into two qualities. "From the first time I sat down to work with a union, credibility and integrity were the two biggest things I needed to display," says Patterson, a former labor relations lawyer who manages a staff of 600 employees (including the county’s HR function), more than 90 percent of whom are union members. "What they’re really looking for is whether they can trust what you say."

Learning and Doing

Experts emphasize the importance of education and training in developing labor relations expertise. Patterson is a graduate of Cornell’s labor relations school. Ruesgen attended the George Meany Center for Labor Studies on a union scholarship earlier in his career. They studied for and earned certification as a Senior Professional in Human Resources, as did Raftas and Haywood.

Twenty-two percent of the questions on the SPHR test are about labor relations, compared with 18 percent of the PHR test. A greater portion of the SPHR test addresses labor relations because that test covers strategic HR issues, points out Debra Cohen, SPHR, chief knowledge officer for SHRM.

Labor relations practitioners also emphasize the value of on-the-job experience. Haywood got her start when she was named the No. 2 person on collective bargaining negotiations. "You learn very quickly," she recalls. "It gave me hands-on experience and knowledge in a quick and effective manner."

Not every organization can afford to groom future labor relations experts by assigning them a mentor. "It takes time and costs money to have someone sit next to your lead negotiator or your head of labor relations," says Ruesgen. "But that’s really where you should spot some of your junior people so that they can build those relationships [with veteran negotiators]."

If on-the-job experience is not an option, HR professionals can seek other opportunities to help prepare them for some—but not all—of the challenges that labor relations poses. If HR professionals are thrown into the heat of negotiations, they can seek training and educational resources from organizations and universities, advice from HR networks, or insights from folks like Patterson, who asserts that book learning only takes one so far.

"When the union [leaders] saw me—I don’t want to say ‘challenging’ because that’s too strong of a word—exploring different options with supervisors and managers sitting at the table to try to get some of what they wanted, I became less of an adversary and more of somebody who was reasonable and somebody they might be able to work with," she recalls of her first experience at the King County bargaining table. "At the same time, it is a tricky dance because you don’t want management to think that you’re not there for them."

Patterson sought to establish credibility with her management colleagues prior to the negotiations. "Those conversations you have [with management] before you get to the table really make a difference," she says. "You explain, ‘We’re going to explore a lot of options, so try to be open to it. What do you really want to get? OK, let’s make sure we get that. But understand—we may have to give on some of these other things, so be open.’ "

Given the rising importance and value of labor relations, more HR professionals should be open to exploring ways to develop these competencies. If they are not, some of their colleagues appear eager to take their places.

"A lot of companies are moving responsibility for negotiations away from HR and to the business unit," warns Terrillion, who provides on-site labor relations education programs to large companies. "I see that as a huge loss for HR."

The author is a business writer based in Austin, Texas, who covers human resource and finance issues.

• SHRM article: Reorganized Labor ( HR Magazine )
• SHRM article: After Historic Win, Democrats to Focus on Workplace Issues (HR News)
• SHRM white paper: Union Awareness and Maintaining Union-free Status
• SHRM web page: SHRM Online Workplace Law Focus Area home page
• Web site: National Labor Relations Board

Related Content

Why AI+HI Is Essential to Compliance

HR must always include human intelligence and oversight of AI in decision-making in hiring and firing, a legal expert said at SHRM24. She added that HR can ensure compliance by meeting the strictest AI standards, which will be in Colorado’s upcoming AI law.

A 4-Day Workweek? AI-Fueled Efficiencies Could Make It Happen

The proliferation of artificial intelligence in the workplace, and the ensuing expected increase in productivity and efficiency, could help usher in the four-day workweek, some experts predict.

Advertisement

Artificial Intelligence in the Workplace

​An organization run by AI is not a futuristic concept. Such technology is already a part of many workplaces and will continue to shape the labor market and HR. Here's how employers and employees can successfully manage generative AI and other AI-powered systems.

HR Daily Newsletter

Stay up to date with the latest HR news, trends, and expert advice each business day.

Success title

Success caption

Employee and Labor Relations in HRM: Benefits of Labor Relations

OnBlick Inc.

May 17, 2022

Table of contents

Complete, update and retain your form i-9s digitally.

Employee and Labour Relations describe the relationship between employees, and between the employer and the employees. They include the contractual, practical, and emotional connection between the managers and their workforce.

According to organizational psychology, there are certain unwritten ‘psychological contracts’ that are derived from the relations between an organization and its members. These contracts are purely individual beliefs in a reciprocal obligation between the employees and the organization. When these contracts are breached on the part of the company, they can be fatal for the employee and labor relations.

Benefits of Employee and Labor Relations

1. commitment to the organization.

A pleasant work environment is a good incentive for an employee to be loyal to their work. When the employees feel connected to their employers and have a good understanding of them, they make efforts to do their tasks well. An individual that is committed to their organization would spread a good word about it among their community that brings in experienced and skilled workers to the company. It improves the brand image that is profitable in terms of the customer experiences as well.

2. Improvement in Employee Motivation

Good relations within the company motivate the employees to work hard. If they feel satisfied with their environment and achievements, they are inclined to make efforts to improve themselves. Motivated employees turn out to be great team members, encouraging their peers to do better. Appreciations from their leaders and colleagues also make the employees feel motivated towards their tasks.

3. Employee Retention

The employees must be made to feel valued about their skills and their work. Even if they are not satisfied with their work, a healthy work environment is a great incentive for employees to stay in the company. Additional employee benefits such as bonuses, regular appraisals, and upskilling offered by a firm may urge the employees to stay loyal to the company. The cost of recruitment and training can be reduced if companies invest in the retention of employees.

4. A Healthy Office Culture

Healthy workplace culture is highly dependent on how the employees are treated in the company. If the employees feel that are not treated equally by their leaders, it may lead to workplace conflicts. Discrimination, harassment, or biased treatment of the employees makes them feel unvalued and insecure about their work. The employees must have a good relationship with their employers concerning their personal and professional lives. Employers can solve workplace conflicts by investigating into conflicts and resolving them in time, fostering their relationships.

5. Increased Revenue

Enhanced labor relations result in improved work productivity, and work profits. It also plays an important role in customer retention. When the employees feel satisfied with their work, they pay attention to the needs of the clients, resulting in a positive customer experience. Engaged employees are more committed to their tasks and this growth can bring better outputs and revenues for the company.

6. Enhanced Focus on Organization Goals

Employee relations promote their need to achieve the goals of their organization with more vigor. Workers who are familiar with the long-term goals of their company, are more efficient in their tasks and focused on how they need to achieve those goals. Having a sense of purpose motivates them to enhance their skills to accommodate in accordance to the goals.

Practices that Promote Labor Relations

The best practices that HR professionals can follow to improve their employee and labor relations include:

i. Present the Employees with the Company Goals

Make sure that the workers are aware of what is expected of them, and that they share the company’s vision for the future. Being a part of a larger goal provides them with a sense of importance attached to their work.

ii. Have Honest Conversation with the Workers

Communication is the key to having a positive employer-employee relationship. When the employers accommodate the tasks of the employees based on their skills and are present for them in times of crisis, it makes them feel safe and confident about their work in the company.

iii. Place your Trust in the Employees

Instead of being aware of every move of your workers, trust them with their work and provide them the liberty to make their decisions. Guide them about what their work is and what is expected of them, to make sure they meet their work objectives.

iv. Invest in Your Workforce

One can express their care for their employees by providing them with the right tools and guidance about their work tasks. The companies can invest in their learning and development departments, employee wellness programs, and mentoring programs to improve the skills of their workers.

Nurturing positive relationships among the employers and employees leads to well-developed employee and labor relations in a company. It highly influences the productivity and performance of the employees, especially during critical times in the company. Strengthening the employee and labor relations not only improves employee engagement in the company but also leads to a successful business as well.

You might also like

AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER, OnBlick Inc is committed to assuring equal opportunity to all persons and does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, gender, religion, ancestry, national origin, sexual orientation, veteran status, age, or disability in its educational programs, activities, admissions, or employment practices as required by Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the Americans with Disabilities Act, other applicable statutes and Board policy.

Ten reasons why unions are important

Today, working people in the UK are facing unprecedented attacks on their right to organise, including their right to strike – with the last UK government introducing the most repressive legislation in decades. A anti-strike law undermines hard won workers’ rights and aimed to silence those who challenged the last UK government’s broken economic policies.  

War on Want is proud to stand in solidarity with workers in the UK and around the world — many of whom face intimidation and retaliation for organising into trade unions.    

There are so many reasons why unions are important — here are just ten of them:  

1. Unity is strength

Unions enable workers to come together as a powerful, collective voice to communicate with management about their working terms and conditions – and to push for safe, fair and decent work.  

Working people need the protection of a union now more than ever. Many employers around the world have tried to divide workers and cut through workers’ rights legislation by shifting the focus away from their own responsibilities towards their workers. Whether by arguing that ‘gig-economy’ workers are self-employed ‘contractors’ rather than employees; or by distancing themselves from the workers in Global South supply chains, who produce the products they profit from.  

Global corporations and fashion brands are keen to point to the thousands of jobs they create. However, without ensuring the essential rights of workers are respected and maintained, this is not decent work.  

Decent work is about the right to employment to begin with, and that employers should provide a living wage for the employee and the family. It should ensure workplace safety without discrimination and the right of employees to organise as trade unions. Anton Marcus , Joint Secretary of FTZ&GSEU in Sri Lanka

2. Better terms and conditions

Workers who join a trade union are more likely to have better terms and conditions than those who do not, because trade unions negotiate for their members through collective bargaining agreements and protect them from bad management practices.   

All aspects of working life should be the subject of discussion and agreement between employers and employees under the protection of a trade union. Trained representatives of the union lead these negotiations on behalf of employees. Unions work constructively with progressive employers to ensure that company changes affecting employees are in the interest of both workers and employer. 

3. More holiday

Unions won the right for workers to have paid holidays. The average trade union member in the UK gets over 25% more annual leave a year than a non-unionised worker.  

4. Higher wages

You earn more in a unionised workplace. Trade union members in the UK earn on average 10% more than non-unionised members. This is the power of collective bargaining.

While many companies post record profits, workers in the UK are feeling the devastating effects of years of real-term pay decreases and cuts to vital public services. Amid a cost-of-living crisis that is dragging more and more people towards poverty, hundreds of thousands of unionised public sector workers have been left with no alternative but to go on strike.  

The UK government should be getting around the table and having meaningful discussions with workers and trade unions to find solutions to the deepening in-work poverty people are facing. Instead, it is undermining the vital role of unions in representing and fighting for the rights of workers.     

Strike action is always a last resort — no worker wants to go on strike and lose pay. But throughout history, union-organised strike action has been a crucial tactic for workers in securing fair pay and working conditions.  

In 2017, MacDonald’s workers made history when they joined the Bakers, Food and Allied Workers’ Union (BFAWU) and went on strike — the McStrike  — for the first time ever.  McDonald’s makes billions every year, but it doesn’t pay its fair share of taxes – or its workers living wages. The McStrike industrial action won McDonald’s workers across the UK the biggest pay rise in over ten years.  

5. Equal opportunities, and protection against discrimination 

Unions fight for equal opportunities in the workplace. Trade unions have fought for laws that give rights to workers: the minimum wage, maximum working time, paid holidays, equal pay for work of equal value as well as anti-discrimination laws.   

It is the trade union movement that is fighting back against the discriminatory and unjust practices of our broken economic system. In Sri Lanka, War on Want’s trade union partner FTZ-GSEU has been at the forefront of battling for workers for over 30 years. So-called ‘free-trade zones’ have eroded the rights of workers around the globe; and in Sri Lanka, as elsewhere, it is mainly women who are most affected by reduced regulations and weak worker protections. 

Separately, women from across the world have joined together to speak out about the sexual harassment they have faced whilst working at McDonald’s. Workers in the USA have even taken strike action. In the UK, the BFAWU-led campaign has led to McDonald’s entering a legal agreement with the Equality and Human Rights Commission to protect workers from sexual harassment. 

6. Better parental leave

Unions are responsible for securing and improving maternity, paternal and carer leave for millions of workers.    

In the UK, unionised workplaces are much more likely to have maternity, paternal and carer leave policies in place which are more generous than the statutory minimum.  

7. Security and stability

Trade union members are more likely to stay in their jobs for longer, on average five years more than non-unionised workers.

8. Health and safety  

Unionised workplaces are safer workplaces.  In the UK, there are 50% fewer accidents in unionised workplaces. Local safety representatives, appointed by trade union shops, deal with issues ranging from stress and mental health issues to hazardous substances, representing their colleagues’ health and safety interests to management.  

9. Legal support

If you have a problem at work, unions can offer legal services and advice.  

In situations such as disciplinary and grievance hearings, your union representative can give you expert advice, support and representation from start to finish. Unions have legal teams who will make sure you are treated fairly and won’t charge you legal fees. Your union will be there for you whether the problem is with employment contracts, harassment, redundancy, pensions or discrimination.  

10. Having someone in your corner

As a union member you are part of something bigger – and have the support of the union when you need it.  

Trade unions are part of an international movement. Global worker solidarity is crucial to ending the worst abuses and injustice working people face, and to push back against poverty, climate breakdown and inequality. War on Want regularly asks our affiliates from the UK trade union movement to stand in solidarity with other workers across the world in their own struggles to protect their livelihoods and right to organise.

Workers against poverty 

War on Want believes that poverty is political. It is the result of decisions made by those who hold power — governments and corporations — and a broken economic system which generates increasing wealth and power for elites at the expense of the majority of people on this earth. Unions have been central to War on Want’s work throughout our history as they are crucial to the fight against global poverty. We know that around the world, organised workers achieve more collectively than they can as individuals.  

The Covid-19 pandemic shone a light on those workplaces and sectors where poor pay and conditions had become almost normalised, where the gap between rich and poor has grown exponentially, and where wealth is rewarded while poverty is punished. 

Here in the UK, it was the trade union movement, not the government, who fought for the furlough scheme which helped many workers to keep their heads above water. And in Sri Lanka and Bangladesh, it was garment worker unions who fought for compensation for workers dismissed in factory closures when global fashion brands cancelled orders – and didn’t pay for work already completed – while continuing to make huge profits.  

Our partnerships with workers’ associations and trade unions focus on building strong, representative and effective worker-led organisations that have the knowledge and skills to create and use opportunities to engage with government and employers to realise safe, decent work. War on Want will continue to work with our affiliates here in the UK and our partners representing and organising workers across the Global South. 

First published on 12 Feb 2018, updated in Feb 2023. 

More debt won't solve Sri Lanka's debt crisis

Secrets and Fries: McDonald’s £295 million tax dodge

Garment Workers: Paying the price of the pandemic

• Garment workers

• Share with Facebook
• Share with Twitter
• Share with E-Mail
• Share with LinkedIn
• Poverty is political
• Trade deals
• Global Green New Deal
• Militarism and repression
• Take action
• Become a member
• Affiliate your trade union
• Sign up for emails
• Leave a gift in your will
• Fundraise for War on Want

Labor Relations in HR

• Labor Relations

“Labor relations” often conjure images of union strikes, collective bargaining, and heated negotiations. However, labor relations is a multifaceted discipline beyond the surface-level drama. It is a field that has evolved, adapting to societal changes, economic shifts, and technological advancements.

In essence, labor relations is the study and practice of managing unionized employment situations. In these settings, Human Resource Management (HRM) professionals must negotiate with unions representing employees to arrive at a collective agreement. This agreement sets the terms and conditions of employees’ work lives, including wages, work hours, and benefits to job security and working conditions.

Labor relations matter because they are a critical component of organizational success. Companies with strong labor relations often report higher levels of employee satisfaction, which can lead to increased productivity. On the other hand, poor labor relations can result in low morale, strikes, and even legal repercussions.

Labor relations also have a societal impact. They influence the balance of power between employers and employees, affecting income inequality, social justice, and quality of life.

Labor relations have become increasingly complex in the modern era due to globalization, the gig economy, and rapid technological changes. These factors have led to new forms of employment contracts and unconventional work arrangements, challenging the traditional paradigms of labor relations.

So, when we talk about labor relations, we are not just discussing a subset of HRM; we are delving into a dynamic field that has far-reaching implications for organizations and society. It is a subject that demands our attention, whether we are business leaders, HR professionals, or even everyday employees.

What is Labor Relations in HR?

In the field of labor relations, the Human Resources department is the lynchpin that holds the organization and its workforce together. Besides mere administrators, HR professionals are the architects of a balanced work environment. They protect the company’s interests and employees’ rights, creating a harmonious atmosphere conducive to productivity.

One of the most critical tasks for HR in the realm of labor relations is to facilitate effective communication between management and employees. This involves not only resolving disputes but also preventing them. By keeping an open dialogue channel, HR helps build trust, a crucial element in any labor relationship.

A recent survey shows approximately 30% of HR tasks are dedicated to labor relations. This includes contract negotiations, grievance handling, and employee engagement programs.

In an era where employee well-being is not just a perk but a competitive advantage, the role of HR in labor relations is more vital than ever. They are the ones who ensure that labor laws are adhered to, that collective bargaining is fair, and that conflicts when they arise, are resolved in a manner that is just for all parties involved.

To sum up, the HR perspective on labor relations is multifaceted. It is not just about rules and regulations but also about fostering a culture where everyone feels heard, respected, and valued. This balanced approach makes HR indispensable in the complex ecosystem of labor relations.

The Legal Framework of Labor Relations

Regarding labor relations, the legal framework is the backbone that holds everything together. It’s not just a set of rules but a dynamic structure that evolves with societal norms and economic conditions. In the United States, for instance, the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) serves as the cornerstone, granting employees the right to form unions and engage in collective bargaining. But that’s just the tip of the iceberg.

While the NLRA is a federal law, states have their own set of labor laws that can either complement or complicate matters. For example, “right-to-work” states in the U.S. make it illegal for union membership to be a condition of employment, which can significantly impact labor relations strategies.

In Europe, labor laws are generally more employee-centric. The United Kingdom’s Employment Rights Act and Germany’s Works Constitution Act are examples of laws that provide robust protections for employees. These laws not only govern how unions operate but also lay down rules for employer-employee interactions, including dispute resolution mechanisms.

Understanding the legal framework is crucial for HR professionals. It informs every decision, from contract negotiations to dispute resolutions. Ignorance isn’t just risky; it’s costly. Legal missteps can result in hefty fines, not to mention the reputational damage that can last for years.

So, what’s the takeaway? The legal landscape of labor relations is complex but navigable. HR professionals must be well-versed in both federal and state and international laws when operating globally. It’s a tall order, but one that comes with the territory when you’re in the business of managing human capital.

Collective Bargaining – The Heart of Labor Relations

Collective bargaining is often considered the cornerstone of labor relations. It’s the process where employers and employees, usually represented by a union, come together to negotiate terms of employment. The terms range from wages and benefits to work hours and safety protocols.

The Anatomy of Collective Bargaining

Collective bargaining is not a one-size-fits-all process; it’s more like a dance where both parties must be in sync. Typically, it starts with the union presenting a list of demands. The employer then reviews these demands, and negotiations commence. It’s a back-and-forth dialogue that requires patience, understanding, and a willingness to compromise.

The Phases of Negotiation

• Preparation – Both parties gather data, assess their needs, and set objectives.
• Initial Proposals – Formal documents are exchanged, outlining each party’s expectations.
• Negotiation – The actual dialogue takes place, often involving multiple rounds.
• Agreement or Impasse – A mutual agreement is reached, or the parties come to an impasse, leading to further actions like mediation.

Why It’s the Heart of Labor Relations

Collective bargaining is pivotal because it sets the stage for a harmonious work environment. When both employers and employees feel heard and respected, it fosters a culture of mutual respect. This, in turn, can lead to increased productivity, lower turnover rates, and a more engaged workforce.

The Power of Data in Collective Bargaining

In today’s digital age, data analytics plays a significant role in shaping collective bargaining outcomes. Employers and unions use data to strengthen their positions, whether it’s salary benchmarks, industry standards, or employee satisfaction surveys.

Conflict Resolution Strategies in HR

Conflict is an inevitable part of any organization, and the stakes are often high regarding labor relations. The role of Human Resources in navigating these choppy waters cannot be overstated. But how exactly does HR go about resolving conflicts between labor and management? Let’s delve into some proven strategies.

• Mediation: One of the most common approaches is mediation, a neutral third-party intervention to facilitate a conversation between conflicting parties. Mediation is often preferred for its less adversarial nature, allowing both sides to agree mutually. The mediator’s role is to help the parties communicate effectively, identify the issues at stake, and explore possible solutions.
• Arbitration: When mediation fails or is not an option, arbitration steps in. Unlike mediation, the arbitrator has the authority to make a binding decision, which both parties must adhere to. Due to its finality, it’s a more formal process and is generally considered a last resort. The arbitrator will hear both sides’ arguments and then issue a decision, which is usually legally binding.
• Open-Door Policy: An open-door policy encourages employees to bring their concerns directly to management or HR without fear of reprisal. This proactive approach can often nip conflicts in the bud before they escalate. Employees should feel comfortable coming forward with any issues, knowing they will be heard and taken seriously.
• The Importance of Training: Training programs aimed at conflict resolution can equip HR professionals with the skills to handle disputes effectively. These programs often cover negotiation techniques, communication skills, and legal aspects of labor relations. HR professionals need to understand the different types of conflict, identify the root causes of conflict, and develop strategies for resolving conflict effectively.

Key Takeaways:

Mediation is often the first step in conflict resolution. Arbitration is a more formal, binding process. An open-door policy can prevent conflicts from escalating. Training programs can equip HR professionals with essential skills.

By adopting a multi-faceted approach to conflict resolution, HR departments can resolve disputes and foster a more harmonious workplace. After all, a peaceful work environment benefits labor and management, driving productivity and job satisfaction.

Measuring Success in Labor Relations – The Metrics That Matter

Key Performance Indicators, or KPIs, are quantifiable measures used to evaluate the success of an organization’s labor relations efforts. They offer a snapshot of current affairs, allowing for real-time adjustments and long-term planning.

Types of Labor Relations Metrics

Employee Turnover Rate –  A high turnover rate could indicate employee dissatisfaction, affecting labor relations negatively.

Absenteeism Rate –  Frequent absences indicate a disengaged workforce and may require immediate attention. Dispute Resolution Time – The time taken to resolve labor disputes can indicate the efficiency of your labor relations strategies.

Employee Engagement Score –  This metric gauges employees’ emotional commitment and enthusiasm, directly impacting labor relations.

Union-Management Relationship Score –  A specialized metric often used in unionized environments to measure the health of the relationship between management and labor unions.

The Dashboard Approach

Imagine a real-time dashboard displaying all these metrics, offering a panoramic view of your labor relations landscape. This isn’t just a pipe dream; many HR software solutions offer this feature, making it easier to keep your finger on the pulse of your organization’s labor relations.

Interpreting the Data

Data is only as good as the insights it provides. Therefore, HR professionals must collect and interpret these metrics to make informed decisions. For example, a sudden spike in absenteeism might warrant an immediate investigation into workplace conditions.

Labor relations metrics are indispensable tools for any HR professional aiming to foster a harmonious work environment. They provide the data-driven insights needed to navigate the complexities of labor relations, ensuring that both employees and employers can thrive.

Crafting Your Blueprint for Labor Relations Excellence

A well-thought-out action plan can navigate the complex labor relations landscape effectively. Any organization can foster a harmonious work environment that benefits both employers and employees by following these steps:

• Assess the current state of labor relations within your organization. Conduct surveys, interviews, and focus groups to gather insights from employees at all levels. This will serve as your baseline data for measuring improvements.
• Identify key stakeholders in labor relations within your organization. These could be union leaders, HR professionals, or even influential employees. Engage them early in the process to ensure their buy-in.
• Set clear objectives for your labor relations strategy. Whether you aim to reduce labor disputes, improve employee satisfaction, or enhance productivity, having clear objectives will guide your actions.
• Develop a communication plan that includes regular updates, town hall meetings, and an open-door policy for grievances. Effective communication is the cornerstone of any successful labor relations strategy.
• Implement conflict resolution mechanisms like an internal mediation team or third-party arbitration services.
• Monitor the effectiveness of your plan and make adjustments as needed. Use KPIs to gauge success, such as the number of labor disputes, employee satisfaction ratings, and productivity levels.
• Celebrate milestones, no matter how small, to boost morale and encourage continued cooperation among all parties involved.

In addition to the steps outlined above, you can improve labor relations in your organization by being transparent and honest with employees, listening to employee concerns and addressing them promptly, being fair and consistent in your treatment of employees, providing employees with opportunities for growth and development, and creating a positive work environment where employees feel valued and respected. Following these tips can create a harmonious work environment that benefits everyone involved.

Here are some additional tips for improving labor relations:

• Be proactive in addressing potential problems. Don’t wait for a problem to arise before taking action.
• Be willing to compromise. Both sides need to be willing to give and take to resolve.
• Be respectful of each other’s opinions. Even if you don’t agree with someone, you can still respect their right to opinion.
• Be willing to listen. One of the best ways to resolve a conflict is to listen to each other’s point of view.
• Be willing to change. Sometimes, changing your behavior is the best way to resolve a conflict.
• Be patient. It takes time to build trust and resolve conflict. Be patient and don’t give up.

These tips can create a positive and productive work environment for everyone involved.

News Categories

• Professional Development
• Talent Acquisition
• Uncategorized

Recent Articles

• 7 Workplace Safety Guidelines for Your HR Department
• Ensuring a Safe and Compliant Environment
• Beyond Benefits: Why Corporate Culture Is Important

The Air Traffic Controllers Strike of 1981 and HR’s Role in Crisis Management

• Six Talent Acquisition Trends Defining 2024 for HR Departments

Related Articles

The 1981 air traffic controllers strike in the United States is one of the most significant labor relations cases in history. It was a pivotal moment for labor unions and a crucial test for Human Resources (HR) management practices. The strike, led by the Professional...

What is a Labor Relations Specialist?

The Role of Labor Relation Specialists in Modern Business The days when labor relations specialists were confined to back offices, overseeing contracts and mediating disputes, are long gone. In the modern era, they are the linchpin that holds the intricate machinery...

Conflict Resolution in Labor Relations: An HR Guide

The Anatomy of Conflict in HR In any organization, conflict is as inevitable as morning coffee. But what makes each conflict unique? Understanding the anatomy of conflict is crucial for HR professionals tasked with maintaining a harmonious work environment. The Many...