presentation on road safety in india

• हिन्दी Hindi
• অসমীয়া Assamese
• বাংলা Bengali
• ગુજરાતી Gujarati
• ಕನ್ನಡ Kannada
• മലയാളം Malayalam
• मराठी Marathi
• ਪੰਜਾਬੀ Punjabi
• தமிழ் Tamil
• తెలుగు Telugu

Home | MyGov

• White to Black
• Poll/Survey
• Andaman & Nicobar Islands
• Arunachal Pradesh
• Chhattisgarh
• Jammu And Kashmir
• Madhya Pradesh
• Maharashtra
• Himachal Pradesh
• Uttarakhand
• Uttar Pradesh
• Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Daman and Diu
• Transforming India
• Self4Society
• Innovate India
• About MyGov
• Work at MyGov
• Associate with MyGov
• MyGov Media
• MyGov Tenders
• Weekly Newsletter
• Pulse Newsletter
• Website Policies
• Points & Badges
• Meity Dashboard
• Usage of Aadhaar
• Web Information Manager
• Terms & Conditions
• Public Grievance

National Road Safety

Sadak Suraksha - Jeevan Raksha

With millions of lives endangered worldwide, road traffic accidents (RTA) rank alarmingly high in the recent trends of pressing social issues. Approximately 328 lives are lost daily, much of which could have been prevented with timely rescue and intervention. Despite the innumerable road safety campaigns and awareness drives, India still ranks first in the number of road accident deaths across 199 countries and accounts for almost 11% of all accident- related deaths in the world. Despite global stagnancy and uncertainty owing to the Covid 19 pandemic and consequent lockdown, road accidents have managed to claim 29,415 lives just between March and June, with an additional 51970 casualties. Clearly, road safety continues to be a major developmental and public health concern, acting as a leading cause of death and injuries worldwide.

Recognizing road accidents as a leading cause of death in the country, the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Government of India has called for a joint effort of the state and central government to facilitate the improvement of road and safety infrastructure and to reduce casualties and mortality.

While the situation might appear rather grim, people need to come together as changemakers, now more than ever before. We must all strive to do our part to ensure that we receive what we deserve - safer roads and safer communities, once and for all.

To improve safety and reduce road crash casualties, the Ministry of Road Transport & Highways (MoRT&H) has entrusted the Indian Road Safety Campaign (a non-profit organization) to lead road safety activities aimed at upping grassroot level citizen involvement in road safety measures across the nation.

Ongoing Activities

Slogan Writing Contest

Participate in the Slogan Writing Contest - Motor Vehicle Driving Regulations

Poster Making Contest

Participate in the Poster Making Contest - Motor Vehicle Driving Regulations

Article Writing Competition on Road Safety

Write articles and share with us!

Motor Vehicle Driving Regulations – Road Safety Quiz

Road Safety Quiz

Road Safety Hackathon

Calling young innovators to transform Indian roads

Take the road safety pledge for a safer India

Movie Making Competition

Participate and raise awareness around road safety

Slogan Writing Competition

Participate in the slogan writing competition to speak up for road safety

Test your Road Safety Knowledge Quiz

Poster Making Competition

Participate in the poster making competition on road safety and preventing loss of lives

Article Writing Competition

Write an essay on Tryst with Destiny to participate in the national road safety month

Safer India Ideathon

Participate in Ideathon and give your ideas for improving Road Safety related issues.

Participate in Hackathon and give unique innovations that have the potential to change the scenario of road safety in India

SLOGAN ON ROAD SAFETY

WRITE A SLOGAN ON ROAD SAFETY - SAVE LIVES

Sorry | Short film | IRSC, IIT Delhi & Ministry of Road, Transport and Highways

The COCONUT STORY || A Video on Importance of Helmet

Golden Hour | Short Film | IRSC, IIT Delhi and Ministry of Road, Transport and Highways

The Game of Life | IRSC, IIT Delhi & MoRTH | Don't Text While Driving!

Unity 4 Safety | Wear a Helmet | IRSC

Unity 4 Safety | Don't Drink & Drive | IRSC

Motor Vehicle Driving Regulations (MVDR) | Important Regulations | IRSC & MoRTH

Paryatan Parv - Road Safety Exhibition by Ministry of Road Transport and Highways

Ministry of Road Transport and Highways releases Annual Report on ‘Road Accidents in India-2022”

The Annual Report on ‘Road Accidents in India-2022” has been published by the Ministry of Road Transport and Highways. This report is based on the data/information received from police departments of States/UTs on calendar year basis in standardized formats as provided by the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP) under the Asia Pacific Road Accident Data (APRAD) base project.

As per the report, a total of 4,61,312 road accidents have been reported by States and Union Territories (UTs) during the calendar year 2022, which claimed 1,68,491 lives and caused injuries to 4,43,366 persons. This marks an increase of 11.9% in accidents, 9.4% in fatalities, and 15.3% in injuries compared to the previous year.

The report underscores the urgency of adopting a comprehensive approach to address the contributing factors to these accidents, including speeding, reckless driving, drunken driving, and non-compliance with traffic regulations. It is crucial that we strengthen enforcement mechanisms, enhance driver education and training programs, and invest in improving the condition of roads and vehicles.

The Ministry is committed to implementing robust measures to curb road accidents. The Ministry is also working towards various aspects such as road user behaviour, road infrastructure, vehicle standards, enforcement of traffic regulations, and the role of technology in accident prevention. As the road accidents are multi-causal in nature, requiring multi-pronged approach to mitigate the problems through concerted efforts of all agencies at both Central Government and State Governments. The Ministry, along with various other related organizations as well as stakeholders has formulated a multi-pronged strategy to address the issue of road safety focusing on all 4Es including Education, Engineering (both roads and vehicles), Enforcement and Emergency Care.

Furthermore, the Ministry is actively involved in initiatives such as implementation of modern transportation systems, road safety audits, and international collaborations to learn from global best practices. Initiatives like the Electronic Detailed Accident Report (e-DAR) for real-time data analysis and automated vehicle inspection centers are also underway to combat road accidents.

The "Road Accidents in India-2022" publication serves as a valuable resource for policymakers, researchers, and stakeholders in the realm of road safety. It offers in-depth insights into various aspects of road accidents, including their causes, locations, and their impact on different categories of road users. The report also sheds light on emerging trends, challenges, and the Ministry's road safety initiatives.

Click here to see the full report. https://morth.nic.in/road-accident-in-india    

Road safety: How a state in India is leading the way to lower road crash deaths

James markland, dominic s. haazen.

Road safety is a critical development priority for South Asia, impacting health, wellbeing and economic growth. Countries in the region must work together if they are to achieve the goal of halving road crash deaths by 2030. This blog is part of our  Together for Road Safety  campaign.

“Every life lost on the road is one too many” resonates viscerally in Tamil Nadu, which until recently, was one of the worst-ranked states in India for road crashes and fatalities  . 

In 2014, more than 15,000 people were dying every year from road crashes in Tamil Nadu. But decision-makers have turned the situation around through strategic vision and leadership.

In 2019, road deaths in Tamil Nadu fell to 10,000, a reduction of over 25 percent.  What’s notable is that improving road safety did not come at the expense of economic development but rather supported it. 

What important lessons can other Indian states learn from Tamil Nadu’s successful experience in improving road safety?  

Tamil Nadu focused on coordinated management of interventions, bringing all key stakeholders to the table.

Strong leadership and improved road safety management

Tamil Nadu focused on coordinated management of multi-sectoral interventions, bringing all key stakeholders to the table, and establishing a Road Safety Executive Leadership Group - responsible for decision making across the state. A Road Safety Management Cell supported the leadership to implement actions, review monthly road safety initiatives, statistics and targets at the district level while crash trends were reviewed monthly by no less than the state’s Director-General of Police. 

Interdepartmental coordination and standard operating procedures included teams of Police, Highways and Transport visiting every fatal crash site and reporting on causative factors, remedial and punitive measures within three days. This provided the recipe for sustained and holistic management of the road safety problem in the state.  

Tamil Nadu has brought down the post-crash response time of emergency medical teams to 14 minutes.

Focus on post-crash response

Improving the trauma care system was an essential component of road safety management in Tamil Nadu  . The state established Emergency Care Centers and Accident Relief Centers on high crash-prone road stretches in national and state highways. 

Response time was dramatically improved through a dedicated call-line as well as proactive allocation and dynamic positioning of ambulances. The state also introduced triage and acuity scoring systems at the pre-hospital level to ensure prioritization of patients. Effective traffic management of emergency vehicles at signalized junctions helped reduce travel time.   

These efforts were supplemented through institutional, data management and capacity building efforts such as developing a Centre of Excellence in trauma care in Kanchipuram, implementing trauma registries in hospitals for systematic data analysis, and first-responder training. These successes have also enabled Tamil Nadu to be well-positioned to quickly adjust and provide additional ambulance support to patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.     

A ‘first of its kind’ crash database system 

Tamil Nadu is a leader in the use of data-driven, scientific approaches to address road safety challenges  with its web enabled GIS-based Road Accident Database Management System (RADMS) developed over a decade ago. This “first of its kind” system, which maps road accidents, identifies the most crash-prone hot spots, and pinpoints corrective action, has now been adopted as the template for replication at a national level for all other states. 

Use of RADMS with its linkage to medical facilities across the state has brought down the post-crash response time of emergency medical teams to 14 minutes  , at par with the world’s best trauma services.  

Adapting infrastructure to a fast urbanizing state 

Tamil Nadu has a tradition of good road building with safety improvement measures built in.  It also adapted its infrastructure to urbanizing conditions through pedestrian footpaths, fencing and crossing facilities, traffic calming, signage, and channelization. 

Between 2014 and 2018, the state Highways Department spent almost $200 million on special road safety programs and on rectifying more than 200 crash hotspots; about 2% of the capital expenditure under its Core Road Infrastructure Development Program has been earmarked for road safety, and the state also effectively utilized the Central Road Fund earmarked to states for safety engineering works.   

Improving road user compliance

Stringent enforcement has also significantly improved road user compliance and transparency. Enforcement of helmet laws, working hours of tourist/maxi cab drivers, and wine shops along highways was tightened; district collectors were asked to rationalize the speed limits on highways and a control room activated to monitor highway police patrol; and traffic regulations strictly enforced with e-challans issued through smart integration with the national vehicle and license databases. 

This yielded impressive results on behavior change - between 2018 and 2019, two-wheeler fatalities in Tamil Nadu due to non-wearing of helmets declined by 28%  . The state is now embarking on the next level of deterrence of risky user behaviors through automated speed enforcement systems and modernized equipment and tools. 

The road ahead

Tamil Nadu’s early successes show that data-driven evidence-based road safety interventions when applied well are likely to produce the desired results.  Mobilizing large resources for road safety is also possible despite the lack of a lead agency and dedicated funding arrangements.

The World Bank worked closely with the state government to support these multi-sectoral road safety initiatives, through projects including the Tamil Nadu Road Sector Project and the Health System Reform Program .

Going forward, sustaining these achievements will require that Tamil Nadu’s efforts on road safety management, post-crash care, infrastructure safety, and digital enforcement are continued. Other states in India would do well to traverse a similar road towards lower road crash deaths.  

• COVID-19 (coronavirus)

Senior Transport Specialist

Lead Health Policy Specialist

Join the Conversation

• Share on mail
• comments added

• Ways to Give
• Contact an Expert
• Explore WRI Perspectives

Filter Your Site Experience by Topic

Applying the filters below will filter all articles, data, insights and projects by the topic area you select.

• All Topics Remove filter
• Climate filter site by Climate
• Cities filter site by Cities
• Energy filter site by Energy
• Food filter site by Food
• Forests filter site by Forests
• Freshwater filter site by Freshwater
• Ocean filter site by Ocean
• Business filter site by Business
• Economics filter site by Economics
• Finance filter site by Finance
• Equity & Governance filter site by Equity & Governance

Search WRI.org

Not sure where to find something? Search all of the site's content.

The Road to Safety in India

• public transit
• road safety
• transportation
• Health & Road Safety

This post originally appeared in The Indian Express on February, 18 2015.

As Michael Bloomberg, former mayor of New York City, announces a package of assistance on road safety through Bloomberg Philanthropies’ Global Safety Initiative, here is an ugly truth: India has one of the worst road safety records in the world, with around 1,37,423 road traffic fatalities in 2013. This makes up about 10 per cent of road crash fatalities worldwide. In absolute numbers, more people die in road crashes in India than anywhere else in the world.

This makes up about 10 percent of road crash fatalities worldwide. In absolute numbers, more people die in road crashes in India than anywhere else in the world.

It is estimated that 17-18 percent of these fatalities occur in urban areas. This poses a serious threat as the country is rapidly urbanising. A recent evaluation of road traffic fatalities in Delhi shows that pedestrians and bicyclists accounted for 63 percent of total fatalities, against 11.4 percent for the country as a whole.

Million-plus cities as well as small and medium towns have witnessed a dramatic increase in the number of fatalities per million population. They also record more road traffic accidents in the evening, which could be attributed to higher speeds, drunk driving and poor visibility. Allahabad recorded the greatest increase in fatalities per million people—405 percent from 2001 to 2009—followed by Agra (319 percent).

Things will probably get worse before they get better. Traffic fatalities increased by about 5 percent per year from 1980 to 2000, and since then have increased by about 8 percent per year.

Domestic vehicle sales increased from 97 lakh in 2008 to almost 2 crore in 2014. There is a strong correlation between the increase in vehicles and increase in road fatalities. Some estimates suggest traffic fatalities will grow five-fold in India by 2050 if we do not take adequate action.

Global experience shows that building safer motor vehicles and re-engineered road geometry does not translate into a better road safety record. There are success stories, like Sweden, where a “vision zero” approach to road safety was able to bring down fatalities to five or six annually. The U.S., on the other hand, managed to bring down the risk of road fatalities per kilometre travelled. However, the total kilometres travelled has grown exponentially in the past decades, hence total road traffic fatalities continue to be high.

Rather than focusing on improving the safety of fast-moving vehicles, the international road safety discourse now focuses on two objectives: reducing the average speed of vehicles and, importantly, reducing the total volume of vehicle kilometres travelled. Together, this is known as a “sustainable transport approach” to road safety. It includes the redesign of urban streets and transport systems so that greater emphasis is put on public transport, non-motorised transport and transit-oriented development. The sustainable transport approach can also be categorised by the Avoid-Shift-Improve (ASI) framework, where the objective is: avoid growth in vehicle kilometres travelled; shift trips to safer and more sustainable modes, like public transport and non-motorised transport, and improve the general condition of transport in terms of safety, time, cost, comfort.

This means India needs a two-pronged approach to road safety, with an equal emphasis on reducing the risk of fatality per kilometre travelled and reducing the number of vehicle kilometres travelled.

There is a critical list of best practices under each approach. Reducing the risk of fatality means strict enforcement of traffic rules—drunk driving, helmet use, seat belts and child restraint, as well as air bags. It means improving the behaviour of all road users: lane driving, keeping to speed limits, using and respecting pedestrian crossings etc. It also means improving road geometry—identifying accident-prone spots and re-engineering them. And finally, it means ensuring that the vehicles manufactured are safer. Governments and planners should require many of these standards by law, and by building a strong system for its enforcement.

Reducing the number of vehicle kilometres travelled means increasing safe access to presently vulnerable road users—bicyclists and pedestrians. Planners should make access to urban streets safer through better design and adequate space for pedestrians and other non-motorised transport users. It also means encouraging alternate, preferably non-motorised, forms of transport, such as cycle rickshaws, for shorter or local commutes. The use of mass-transit systems such as buses and trains to assist long-distance commutes is strongly recommended.

Planners should rationalise new road infrastructure investments by asking if it is a priority if only a small percentage of commuters own or drive cars. In Mumbai, for instance, just 14 percent use private cars or two-wheelers, whereas the majority spend a large part of their commute as pedestrians or users of public transport. As is often repeated within the transport sector, a rich nation is not one in which the poor have cars but one in which the rich use public transport.

Relevant Work

Release: rid the world of 1.25 million road deaths a safe system approach shows the way, 7 proven principles for designing a safer city, india has the worst road safety record in the world. a new law aims to change that, want healthy, thriving cities tackle traffic safety first, how you can help.

WRI relies on the generosity of donors like you to turn research into action. You can support our work by making a gift today or exploring other ways to give.

Stay Informed

World Resources Institute 10 G Street NE Suite 800 Washington DC 20002 +1 (202) 729-7600

© 2024 World Resources Institute

Envision a world where everyone can enjoy clean air, walkable cities, vibrant landscapes, nutritious food and affordable energy.

The Vision Zero Handbook pp 1–39 Cite as

Traffic Safety in India and Vision Zero

• Geetam Tiwari 5 &
• Dinesh Mohan 6  
• Living reference work entry
• Open Access
• First Online: 20 October 2022

314 Accesses

This chapter presents the current state of traffic safety in India and a brief overview of history of traffic safety policies in India. The road safety policy adopted by the Government of India does not have any specific targets; however, the government has accepted the UN sustainable development goals (SDG) and targets in 2016. SDG 3.6 is related to road traffic injuries, and it requires that the fatalities due to road traffic crashes must be reduced by 50% by 2030. The last section of the chapter presents a roadmap for selected cities in India for achieving SDG target 3.6 by 2030 and discusses the results in the context of “Vision Zero” for India.

Dinesh Mohan: deceased.

You have full access to this open access chapter,  Download reference work entry PDF

Introduction

“Vision Zero” is a landmark safety policy. It was introduced in Sweden at a time when Swedish roads and transport system were considered one of the safest systems in the world. Most countries have traditionally accepted that health losses due to accidents are a major, but to some extent acceptable, consequences of mobility. Contrary to this, the Swedish parliament in October 1997 opined that the long-term target for the road transport system should be that no one should be killed or receive long-term disablement by the system (Claes Tingvall 1998 ; Claes Tingvall and Haworth 1999 ). The Vision is an expression of ethical imperative that “It can never be ethically acceptable that people are killed or seriously injured when moving within the road transport system” (Claes Tingvall and Haworth 1999 ).

Vision Zero demands that the loss of human life in the road transport system is unacceptable, and therefore the transport system should be designed in a way that such events do not occur. This means that safety is a more important issue than other issues in the road transport system (except for health-related environmental issues). Mobility, therefore, should follow from safety and cannot be obtained at the expense of safety. Prior to the introduction of the Swedish Vision Zero concept, Dr. William Haddon in the USA had proposed that road traffic injuries be considered a serious public health problem and provided a structured method of analyzing and developing targeted interventions for safety (Haddon 1970 , 1980 ). Charles Perrow introduced a structural analysis of complex systems, highlighting the notion of systemic error rather than an individual’s error in high-risk systems (Perrow 1984 ). Vision Zero brought in the “Ethical Imperative” in the traffic safety debate.

That road traffic injuries (RTI) should be considered a public health problem has been accepted for decades (Gibson 1961 ; Haddon 1963 , 1968 ). In 1962, L.G. Norman, who was the Chief Technical Officer of the London Transport Executive, prepared a report for the WHO in which he stated that “It has even been suggested that the limit of human performance is being reached in this respect and that the consequent accidents are the inevitable price of motorization. This view should not be accepted” and that “As a public health problem, road accidents are amenable to treatment by the methodology applied to epidemic disease, including the detailed investigation of individual incidents and the application of epidemiological techniques” (Norman 1962 ). However, RTI is the only public health problem where society and decision-makers still accept death and disability on such a large scale as inevitable (Mohan 2003 ). This human sacrifice is deemed necessary to maintain high levels of mobility and is seen as a necessary “externality” of doing business. Discussion only revolves around the number of deaths and injuries we are willing to accept. This is made clear in the opening paragraph of the US Highway Safety Manual : “There is no such thing as absolute safety. There is risk in all highway transportation. A universal objective is to reduce the number and severity of crashes within the limits of available resources, science, and technology, while meeting legislatively mandated priorities” (AASHTO 2010 ). A complete departure from this mode of thinking is “Vision Zero” that originated in Sweden. In October 1997, the Road Traffic Safety Bill founded on Vision Zero was passed by a large majority in the Swedish parliament (Tingvall 1997 ; ““Vision Zero” in perspective of global generalization,” 1998 ).

This chapter presents the current state of traffic safety in India and the issues surrounding the possibility of moving toward Vision Zero. A brief overview of history of traffic safety policies in India is presented to set the context. The road safety policy adopted by the Government of India ( https://morth.nic.in/national-road-safety-policy-1 ) does not have any specific targets; however, the government has accepted the UN sustainable development goals (SDG) and targets in 2016. ( https://niti.gov.in/index.php/verticals/sustainable-dev-goals ) SDG 3.6 is related to road traffic injuries.

National Road Traffic Injury Fatality Rate

According to official statistics, 151,417 persons were killed and 469,418 injured in road traffic crashes in India in 2018 (Transport Research Wing 2019). However, this is probably an underestimate, as not all injuries are reported to the police (Bhalla et al. 2017, Mohan et al. 2009, Gururaj 2006). The actual number of injuries requiring hospital visits may be 2,000,000–3,000,000. In GBD 2010, it was estimated that there were 2.2 million injuries in India that warranted hospital admission, and 18 million injuries warranted an emergency room visit (Bhalla et al. 2014). Road traffic injuries (RTI) in India have been increasing over the past 50 years (Fig. 1 ). This may be partly due to the increase in the number of vehicles on the road but mainly due to the absence of coordinated evidence-based policy to control the problem. These data show that the number of fatalities has continued to increase at about 70% a year over 2000–2010, a slight lower rate over the past decade.

Road traffic deaths in India from 1970 through 2018. (Source: NCRB 2015 and Transport Research Wing 2019)

Ranking in Causes of Death and Population Health

Figure 2 shows the top ten causes of years of life lost (YLLs) in India in 2017 and percent change between 2007 and 2017 for all ages (Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) 2018). This figure shows that injuries resulting from road traffic crashes impose a substantial burden on the health of the population in India. Road traffic injuries are the ninth leading cause of premature death in India, and this exceeds the number of those who succumb to many diseases like malaria and HIV that are acknowledged to be important health issues in the country.

Top ten causes of years of life lost (YLLs) in India in 2017 and percent change between 2007 and 2017 for all ages. (Source: Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME 2018))

Figure 3 shows that over the last two and a half decades, the burden of road traffic injuries in India has increased, while that due to many infectious diseases has declined. In 1990, road traffic injuries were the 16th leading cause of health loss. However, in 2016 they were ranked tenth due to an increase of 65% in disability adjusted life years (DALYs) attributed to road traffic injuries (Indian Council of Medical Research, Public Health Foundation of India, & Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) 2017).

Change in DALYs number and rate for the leading individual causes in India from 1990 to 2016. (Source: Indian Council of Medical Research, Public Health Foundation of India, & Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) 2017)

International Comparison

The 2018 WHO Global Status Report on Road Safety provides two sets of road traffic death statistics for every country (WHO 2018 ). These are the official government statistics (usually based on police data) reported by each country to the WHO and statistical estimates produced by the WHO by analysis of national health data (including vital registration) for each country. Figure 4 shows the official RTI fatality rates for different countries plotted against per capita income of the countries, and Fig. 5 shows the rates for the same countries as estimated by the WHO (WHO 2018 ). These figures show that for 43% of the countries, the WHO estimates are 1.5 times greater, and for 26% more than 3 times greater than the official rates are reported by the countries.

RTI fatality rate per 100,000 persons reported by different countries vs per capita income. (Source: WHO 2018 )

RTI fatality rate per 100,000 persons as estimated by WHO for different countries vs per capita income. (Source: WHO 2018 )

The ratio of the WHO estimate and the official rate for different countries is shown in Fig. 6 . The ratio for India is 2.0 as the official reported rate is 11.4 deaths per 100,000 persons and the WHO estimate is 22.6. These data indicate that some countries with similar incomes have lower levels of underreporting and some with higher income levels have also have higher levels of underreporting. This suggests that lower national income levels cannot be taken as an excuse for inefficient data collection systems and it is possible for countries like India to set up professionally managed data collection systems that give a reasonably accurate estimate of RTI fatalities. Systematic collection requires streamlining police data at State level, establishing a system like FARS (Fatal Accident Recording System) in the USA.

Ratio of the WHO estimates and official RTI fatality rate per 100,000 persons for different countries vs per capita income. (Source: WHO 2018 )

Both the official country data and the WHO estimates (Figs. 4 and 5 ) show that there are countries with incomes similar to India that have RTI fatality rates lower than India. Again, demonstrating that lack of finances does not necessarily mean that a society has to have absence of safety on the roads. Of course there are many factors other than income that affect crash fatality rates. However, income is considered an important factor. At the same time, many countries much richer than India have much higher fatality rates. Therefore, we cannot depend on growth in national income alone to promote road safety. It will be necessary to put in place evidence-based national safety policies to ensure improvements in traffic safety.

Analysis of Data at the National Level

National fatality rates.

Figure 7 shows the official estimates for the total number of RTI fatalities and fatalities per 100,000 persons in India from 1970 to 2018 (Transport Research Wing 2019). The total number of deaths in 2018 was 10 times greater than in 1970 with an average annual compound growth rate (AACGR) of 6%, and the fatality rate in 2018 was 4.3 times greater than in 1970 with an AACGR of 4%. There are indications that the rate of growth of fatalities in India decreased after 2010. There have been a few periods when the absolute growth in RTI fatalities decreased briefly, but the causes for the same are not known. However, it is known that motor vehicle crash rates have a tendency of decreasing along with a downturn in the national economy (International Traffic Safety Data and Analysis Group 2015):

Economic downturns are associated with less growth in traffic or a decline in traffic volumes. They are associated with a disproportionate reduction in the exposure of high-risk groups in traffic; in particular unemployment tends to be higher among young people than people in other age groups. Reductions in disposable income may be associated with more cautious road user behaviour, such as less drinking and driving, lower speed to save fuel, fewer holiday trips.

Total number of RTI fatalities and fatalities per 100,000 persons in India. (Source: Transport Research Wing 2019)

This may explain the reason why the rate of growth in fatalities slowed down in India in the late 1990s and in the period 2010–2014 as these were also periods of low economic growth. Two modelling exercises have attempted to predict the time period over which we might expect fatality rates to decline in different countries (Koornstra 2007, Kopits and Cropper 2005).

Kopits and Cropper used the past experience of 88 countries to model the dependence of the total number of fatalities on fatality rates per unit vehicle, vehicles per unit population, and per capita income of the society. Thus, based on projections of future income growth, they predicted that fatalities in India will continue to rise until 2042 before reaching a total of about 198,000 deaths and then begin to decline. Koornstra used a cyclically modulated risk decay function model, which in a way incorporates the cyclically varying nature of a society’s concerns for safety and predicts an earlier date of 2030 for the start of decline in RTI fatalities in India. If we assume the average growth rate of 6% per year declines to nil by 2030, then we can expect about 200,000 fatalities in 2030 before we see a reduction in fatalities.

The above models use the experience of high-income countries (HIC) over the past decades in calculating relationships between vehicle ownership levels and risk of death per vehicle. Therefore, the models presuppose the onset of decline at specific per capita income levels if the past road safety policies of HICs are followed in the future in countries like India. These predictions are based on the assumption that the relationship between fatality rates and income follows a pattern as shown in Fig. 4 . However, if the pattern is more like the one shown in Fig. 5 , then these predictions would not be reliable. The relationship between national income and RTI fatality rates (initial increase in deaths with increasing incomes and a subsequent decrease) may not be entirely correct. Therefore, it is possible that the earlier claims that fatality rates will continue to increase until societies reach income levels between US$ 10,000 and 20,000 (2013 international prices) before decreasing are probably not correct.

Based on an analysis of RTI fatality trends in Europe and the USA, Brüde and Elvik (2015) suggest that:

A country does not at any time have an ‘optimal’ or ‘acceptable’ number of traffic fatalities. In countries with a growing number of traffic fatalities, one cannot count on this trend to turn by itself; active policy interventions are needed to turn the trend.

The trend shown in Fig. 4 is often used to justify that RTIs will increase until the per-capita income reaches 10 K USD. Elvik (2015) conclude that active policy interventions are required to turn the trend”. If this is true, then the only way the decline of RTI fatalities can be brought forward at time is to institute evidence-based India-specific road safety policies that are more effective .

Estimates of Modal Share of RTI Fatalities in India

Figure 8 shows estimates of the share of different road user fatalities as reported by MoRTH (Transport Research Wing 2019) and estimates made by Hsiao et al. (2013), the present authors (IIT Delhi estimate), and Dandona et al. ( 2020 ). Hsiao et al.’s estimates are based on a nationally representative mortality survey of 1.1 million homes in India which reported 122,000 RTI deaths, IIT Delhi estimate is based on an analysis of police records obtained from 8 cities (Delhi Traffic Police 2014, Mani and Tagat, 2013, Mohan et al. 2013) and a number of locations on rural roads around the country (Gururaj et al. 2014, Tiwari 2015 , Tiwari et al. 2000, and Dandona et al.’s ( 2020 ) estimate is based on several verbal autopsy data sources.

Estimates of the share of different road user fatalities in India. Note: MTW, motorized two-wheeler; TSR, three-wheeled scooter ricksha. (Source: Transport Research Wing 2019, Hsiao et al. 2013, GBD: Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), IIT Delhi estimate – authors of the present report)

The MoRTH estimates suggest that pedestrian fatalities constitute only 15% of total RTI fatalities in the country. The Hsiao et al. (2013), IIT Delhi, and Dandona et al. ( 2020 ) estimates for share of pedestrian fatalities are 37%, 33%, and 35%, respectively. This is a very large gap between the official and researchers’ estimates. Since Hsiao et al. and Dandona et al. have estimated the fatalities from verbal autopsies with a statistically representative sample of households in India (a part of the sample registration system of the Registrar General of India), it is likely that their numbers are closer to the truth. The IIT Delhi estimate is made from detailed analysis of police reports from various parts of the country and, therefore, may be considered as being based on official data, though from a smaller sample in the country. Since these latter estimates for pedestrian fatalities are similar, it is quite certain that these estimates are more reliable than those in MoRTH reports. The error in the official reports probably arises from wrong coding of the victims’ status, and the procedure needs to be reviewed carefully and revised. A detailed analysis of police records shows that the cases are registered, however, error occurs at the time of coding. Non recording may also be there, however, bigger problem at the moment is wrong coding. The Indian official estimates of pedestrian fatalities are extremely low compared to independent researchers’ estimates (~15% vs ~35%); therefore, official estimates for all other modes will also be wrong. MoRTH data is based on police coding. The data is collected from the police station, compiled at State level and then at the National level. We have explained the coding problem of data earlier. IITD data source is also police data, however, coding is done in the lab after reading the description of the crash. The difference in the two data sets point to the erroneous coding. Hsia et al. (2013) and Dandona et al. (2017) is based on a different methodology (oral autopsy of one million deaths in the country). MoRTH is erroneous for coding the victims, when a bigger vehicle is involved. MTW and bus collision in which MTW is the victim may get recorded as bus victim if the bus has been recorded as vehicle at fault. For the time being, we will have to use research estimates for modal share of road traffic fatalities and not the official number.

The modal share estimates for India are significantly different from those in most high-income countries (Table 1 ). What is most important to note here is that the proportion of car occupant deaths for countries included in Table 1 (except Japan) is greater than 40% and motorized two-wheelers (MTW) less than 23%. Estimates in Fig. 8 suggest that car and motorized two-wheeler occupant fatality proportions are <10% and >30%, respectively. These proportions in India are unlikely to change dramatically over the next decade. Because of these differences, road safety priorities may have to be very different in India, and some new safety interventions would have to be developed to move toward Vision Zero.

RTI in Urban Areas

According to the MoRTH report, 51,379 (34%) fatalities took place in urban areas and 100,038 (66%) in rural areas (Transport Research Wing 2019). These data suggest that the urban RTI fatality share is about the same as the estimated urban population share (34%) in 2018. (Rural population (% of total population) – India. The World Bank. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.RUR.TOTL.ZS?locations=IN ) The latest report includes details for 50 million-plus (population) cities recording a total of 17,709 fatalities (34% of all urban RTI deaths). Figure 9 shows deaths reported in these cities for 2015 and 2018. Figure 10 shows the RTI death rates per 100,000 population in million-plus cities for 2015 and 2018. Population numbers for these cities are not available for 2015 and 2018 from the Office of the Registrar General and Census Commissioner, India. Population for each city in 2015 and 2018 was estimated using 2011 figures and official growth rates for the states they are located in (Technical Group on Population Projections 2006 ).

Annual RTI deaths in million-plus (population) cities in 2015 and 2018. (Source: Transport Research Wing 2019)

RTI deaths per 100,000 persons in million-plus (population) cities in 2015 and 2018. (Source: Transport Research Wing 2019)

There were 10 cities with 50% lower rates than the average for all cities in 2018 with rates ranging from 2 to 7 fatalities per 100,000 population: Ahmedabad, Amritsar, Hyderabad, Kannur, Kochi, Kolkata, Mumbai, Pune, Srinagar, and Surat. It is not possible to explain the differences in city fatality rates per hundred thousand persons as we do not have details of the implementation of safety policies in any of these cities. It is interesting to note that none of the high-rate cities include cities with populations greater than three million, whereas the low-rate cities include five with population greater than five million. The low-rate cities have rates that are similar to some of those in high-income countries. It would be important to investigate why rates are so different across cities in the same country. The findings might give us new clues on planning for Vision Zero in India. A study that examined the influence of road type and junction density on road traffic fatality rates in cities in the USA suggests that a city with a higher proportion of wider roads and large city blocks will tend to have higher traffic fatality rates and therefore in turn require much more efforts in police enforcement and other road safety measures (Mohan et al. 2017a ). We need to understand the influence of city form on road traffic crashes to make Vision Zero a reality. Since a vast majority of the victims in the cities are vulnerable road users, one possible cause of low death rates in low-rate cities (populations greater than five million) could be reduction of vehicle speeds due to congestion.

RTI Details for Selected Cities

Table 2 shows the proportion of road traffic fatalities by road user type in nine Indian cities. These cities vary in population from 280,000 to 20 million. The data for Delhi were obtained from the Delhi Police Department and for all other cities by analyzing First Information Reports (FIR) maintained by the police departments in the respective cities for a period of three years (Mohan, Tiwari, and Mukherjee 2013).

The proportion of vulnerable road user (pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorized two-wheelers) deaths in the nine cities range between 84% and 93%, car occupant fatalities between 2% and 7%, and occupants of three-wheeled scooter taxis (TSTs) less than 5% per cent, except in Vishakhapatnam where the proportion for the latter is 8%. The total of vulnerable road user deaths remains relatively stable across cities of different sizes, and the proportion of pedestrian deaths appears to be higher in cities with larger populations. VRUs are pedestrians, bicyclists and MTW victims. When these columns are added in Table 2 , the range is 65–75%. Proportion of pedestrians in Delhi and Mumbai the large cities is higher than other cities.

RTI Victims and Impacting Vehicles

Figure 11 shows the data for distribution of road traffic fatalities by road user category versus the respective impacting vehicles/objects for two of the nine cities, Vishakhapatnam and Bhopal. These two cities are representative of the patterns in all the cities studied and have been selected as the fatality rates per 100,000 persons are different with Vishakhapatnam at 24 and Bhopal at 14 in 2011. In both cities, the largest proportion of fatalities for all road user categories (especially vulnerable road users) is associated with impacts with buses and trucks and then cars. This is true for the other cities also. The most interesting feature emerging from this analysis is the involvement of MTW as impacting vehicles for pedestrian, bicyclist, and MTW fatalities in the cities. The proportion of pedestrian fatalities associated with MTW impacts ranges from 8% to 25% of the total. The highest proportion was observed in Bhopal. The involvement of MTWs as impacting vehicles in vulnerable road user (VRU) fatalities may be due to the fact that pedestrians and bicyclists do not have adequate facilities on the arterial roads of these cities and that they have to share the road space (the curbside lane) with MTW riders.

Fatal RTI road user category and impacting vehicles/objects in Vishakhapatnam and Bhopal (numbers in bars represent number of cases; TST: three-wheeled scooter taxis)

The issue of serious injuries and fatalities among pedestrians hit by motorcycles has not received much attention internationally. Since the use of motorized two-wheeler for personal transport and deliveries is increasing in a large number of countries, it is necessary to give greater attention to safer motorcycle design and management of their movement on city roads .

RTI on Intercity Highways

Figure 12 shows the proportion of RTI fatalities on different categories of roads and the proportion of road length for each category (Transport Research Wing 2019). Fatality rate per km of road is the highest on national highways with 47.3 deaths per 100 km annually (Fig. 13 ). The relatively high death rate on NH could be because they carry a significant proportion of passenger and freight traffic. However, since details of vehicle km travelled on various categories of highways are not available, it is not possible to make a comparison based on exposure rates.

The proportion of RTI fatalities on different categories of roads and the proportion of road length for each category. (Source: Transport Research Wing 2019)

Fatalities per 100 km on different categories of roads in India in 2018. (Source: Transport Research Wing 2019)

Recent research studies have reported fatal crash rates (fatalities per km) for three NH (NH-1, NH-8, and NH 2) as 3.08 crashes/km/year on six-lane NH-1, followed by 2.54 crashes/km/year on four-lane NH-24 bypass, and 0.72 crashes/km/year on two-lane NH-8 (Naqvi and Tiwari 2015 ).

RTI Patterns on Highways

A detailed study of 35 selected locations on highways showed that pedestrians and bicyclists constituted 43% of the fatalities (Tiwari, Mohan, and Gupta 2000) (Table 3). A more recent study (Tiwari 2015 ) investigated police reports of fatal crashes on selected locations on two-lane, four-lane, and six-lane highways and showed that the proportions of motor vehicle occupants and vulnerable road users were 32, 19 and 52% and 68% respectively, whereas the proportions for urban areas were 5%–10% vehicle occupants and the rest vulnerable road users. Though the motor vehicle occupant fatalities are higher on highways than in urban areas, as would be expected, the differences are not as high as in Western countries. A majority (68%) of those getting killed on highways in India comprise vulnerable road users, and this fact should be the guiding factor in future design considerations. Data from three highway segments from 2009 to 2013 show a similar pattern. Pedestrian and MTW proportions are very high except on the six-lane highway where the proportion of truck victims is higher.

Table 4 shows the involvement of different impacting vehicles in fatal crashes on highways. This shows that as far as vehicle involvement is concerned, the patterns are similar in urban and rural areas. Trucks and buses are involved in about 70% of fatal crashes in both rural and urban areas. This is again very different from Western countries where there are significant differences in rural and urban crash patterns.

It is possible that these high rates of vulnerable road deaths on rural highways are due to the fact that these roads pass through high-density population areas where local residents who do not possess motorized means of transport have to walk along these roads, cross them, or wait on the shoulders to access public transport. Some major design standards for rural highways and expressways have to be re-examined in the light of these findings.

Road Safety Policies and Enabling Legislation in India

When cars appeared on the street in the West and elsewhere, traffic engineering was established as a formal scientific and technical discipline. In the mid-nineteenth century, British colonial rulers in India established formal engineering training institutes to assist in the construction of railways, roads, and canals. The focus of this training was to impart knowledge about concrete, surveying, and construction techniques. The textbooks and the teaching resources came from the UK and the English language (Palit 1998 ). The Indian Roads Congress was established in 1934 to guide Indian engineers how to plan and build roads. The concrete roads were replaced with asphalt roads as was done in Europe, and the control of roads was given to provincial authorities – state public works departments – and local municipalities in some cases. The national trunk roads remained under the central control, and the Central Road Fund was created in 1930 to develop and maintain these roads. (Gijs Mom, India and the Tools of Empire: the emergence of the layeredness of modern mobility) Almost one hundred years later, the Indian Roads Congress continues to be an important professional body today. A large number of road planning and design guidelines have been issued to guide the field engineers involved in rural roads, state highways, and national highways.

The first Motor Vehicles Act in 1939 was introduced with the motivation to control vehicles plying on the road and protect the interests of the state-run railways. The number of cars, buses, and trucks grew from 1918 to 1930; however, there was a sharp decline in the number of cars from 1930 to 1940, and the number of buses and trucks remained constant. Buses were mostly for intercity movement. Buses provided a good option for third-class railway passengers, and cars competed with the first-class railway passengers. In cities three-wheeled “ rickshaw ” was first introduced for goods movement by Chinese traders and quickly spread in most major cites as passenger vehicles. A multilayered complex mobility evolved with the introduction of new technologies. Though there was some substitution of travel modes, it was not in a simple linear pattern which is easily predictable. The Census of India in 1936–1937 shows the dominance of pedestrian traffic followed by rickshaw motor cars and buses, not very different from the mix of traffic present on Indian roads a century later, with the exception of motorized two-wheeler.

While the road planning and construction is guided by various codes and guidelines issued by the Indian Roads Congress, the vehicle movement and vehicle specifications and penalties for violation of MVA rules are guided by the Motor Vehicles Act and Central Motor Vehicles Rules (CMVR). Until the mid-1980s, there was little discussion of traffic safety in these documents. The 1939 Act was primarily concerned about fixing liability based on driver error as “rash and negligent” behavior, enhancing penalties, and creating additional offenses. The existing law and policy debate on road safety in India have continued to focus on these three aspects. The 1987 urban transport plans expressed concern over vehicular pollution and traffic safety. There is also a discussion of planning urban areas in such a way that the need for travel is reduced – self-contained districts. “Efforts have been made to restrict the movement of slow moving vehicles like cycle rickshaws, hand carts and animal-drawn carts on congested roads within the CBD area in many cities. Priority for buses and other passenger vehicles, ban on heavy goods carriers and exclusive pedestrian streets are some of the regulatory measures suggested for the improvement of the traffic conditions in several cities” (Srinivasan, N.S. et al.Urban roads- India Report. in PIRAC World Road Congress, 1987).

Two important developments occurred in the late 1980s. One, the National Highways Authority of India was set up by an act of the Parliament, NHAI Act, 1988: “An Act to provide for the constitution of an Authority for the development, maintenance and management of national highways and for matter connected therewith or incidental thereto.” ( https://nhai.gov.in/about-nhai.htm ) The second important development was the revision of the Motor Vehicles Act of 1939. The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, came into force from 1 July 1989. It replaced Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, which earlier replaced the first such enactment Motor Vehicles Act, 1914. For exercising the legislative provisions of the Act, the Government of India made the Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989.

In 2005, the Ministry of Roads and Highways (MoRTH) that constituted an expert committee on Road Safety and Traffic Management was given two responsibilities (Committee 2007 ):

Study what new laws or amendments to existing laws would be required.

Recommend a structure for the proposed Directorate of Road Safety and Traffic Management, and advise on its role and functions.

Some of the key observations of the committee report were:

Existing institutions are not equipped to deal with increasing traffic on the roads.

Key ministries and the public sector play a peripheral role in improving road safety.

Road safety is not a priority in the development agenda of the state and central governments.

The existing Road Safety Council does not have adequate statutory backing, budgetary resources, or the mandate to be effective.

India must adopt the advancements made globally in road safety techniques and technology.

The Committee also appended a draft of a law to its report, calling it the National Road Safety and Traffic Management Act. The Bill based on this draft was not accepted by the parliament.

In 2014, the Supreme Court of India established a committee of road safety experts headed by a retired justice of the Supreme Court of India. The committee’s mandate is to (1) measure and monitor on behalf of the Supreme Court the implementation of various laws relating to road safety in the states and central ministries and (2) to identify the need for further legislation or changes in the existing laws.

The committee has been directing state governments to report progress made in implementing road safety laws since 2014. The 1988 Act was amended by The Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act, 2019 . The Act provides in detail the legislative provisions regarding licensing of drivers /conductors, registration of motor vehicles, control of motor vehicles through permits , special provisions relating to state transport undertakings, traffic regulation, insurance , liability, offenses and penalties, etc. The amended MVA has several provisions not included earlier: increased compensation for road accident victims, Motor Vehicle Accident fund to provide compulsory insurance cover to all road users, defining a good Samaritan, recall of defective motor vehicles, development of the National Transport Policy and National Road Safety Board, recognizing taxi aggregators, and increased penalties for several offenses.

Out of the many amendments proposed in the Act, increased penalties have been implemented in many states from 1 September 2019, and at the same time many states have decided to “dilute” the suggested increase in penalties. Most of the suggested amendments seem to be based on “common sense” as opposed to scientific evidence and therefore are not likely to have a serious impact on reducing road traffic crashes.

Many road safety concerns have not been addressed by the amended MVA. For example, the presence of villages and small towns along the highways has resulted in a mixed traffic patterns on highways in India. The density of small towns and villages along the highway and the presence of tractors, MTW, and three-wheelers on the highway along with cars, buses, trucks, and truck trailers present a very different traffic mix as compared to North America and Western Europe where most of the highway standards have been developed.

Traffic crash patterns in India are also substantially different as compared to North America and Western Europe. Pedestrian and motorcyclist involvement in fatal crashes on highways is greater than that of other road users. These highway crash patterns are similar to those observed in urban areas. In the past two decades, major investments have gone into expanding the national highway system in India. Yet the number of fatalities has continued to grow. This requires review of the current highway standards prevalent in India. Perhaps field experiments are required to develop appropriate road designs which meet the requirement of mixed traffic as is the practice in many European and North American countries.

Despite the efforts in the last few decades, the number of road traffic fatalities has continued to increase in India. The MoRTH report of 2018 has listed 1,51,430 fatalities. On the other hand, a study based on the sample registration system (verbal autopsies of a national sample) of the Government of India estimated that there were 275,000 road traffic fatalities in India in 2017 (Menon et al. 2019 ), and another recent modelling estimates 218,876 fatalities in the same year (Dandona et al. 2020 ). These estimates report higher share of pedestrian and motorized two-wheelers as RTC victims as compared to the MoRTH report. The states with better road infrastructure have higher rates of fatalities (Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Kerala, Maharashtra, etc.). The MVA amendments do not address the reliability of crash estimates, which forms the basis of designing preventive strategies.

We have not yet created a system of producing scientific evidence for designing preventive strategies in India. A 2007 report from New South Wales in Australia evaluated the effectiveness of stricter penalties and found, “It is suggested that substantial increases in fines and licence disqualifications would have limited potential in deterring recidivist offenders. The present analysis, failed to find any evidence for a significant relationship between fine amount and the likelihood that an offender will return to court for a new driving offense. Nor was there any evidence from our analyses to suggest that longer license disqualification periods reduced the likelihood of an offender reappearing before the courts” (Briscoe 2004 ), and a meta-analysis suggests that “Increasing traffic fines was found to be associated with small changes in the rate of violations” (Elvik 2016 ). This suggests that increased fines as suggested in the amended MVA alone will not have the intended effect of reducing traffic crashes. The current traffic safety science suggests that if road users do not take their share of the responsibility, for example, due to a lack of knowledge or competence, or if personal injuries occur or for other reasons that lead to risk, the system designers (road designers) must take further measures to prevent people from being killed or seriously injured. This is consistent with the Vision Zero theory, which suggests that humans have limitations in perception, diligence, and other driving-related performance that are predictable and inevitable. These natural limitations are the primary reason for increased responsibility by system designers.

Therefore, reduction in the growing health burden due to traffic crashes requires establishing a system or institutional structure which enables generation of new knowledge – new road standards to ensure safe highways and urban roads in India, a highway design that can ensure safety of pedestrians, and a roundabout design that can control speeding two-wheelers. The newly amended Motor Vehicles Act provides for a National Road Safety Board to be created by the central government through a notification. The Board will advise the central and state governments on all aspects of road safety and traffic management including (i) standards of motor vehicles, (ii) registration and licensing of vehicles, (iii) standards for road safety, and (iv) promotion of new vehicle technology. The proposed board does not have any statutory powers; this may become another version of the current National Road Safety Council having representation from various ministries and other stakeholders with no statutory powers. The NRSC is expected to meet at least once a year. The presence of NRSC has not had any impact in reducing traffic crashes in the past. In the next section, we present case studies based on current safety knowledge.

Can Current Safety Knowledge Lead to Vision Zero in India?

In this section we present a scenario analysis for two small cities in India to estimate the effectiveness of implementing specific vehicle- and infrastructure-related strategies. In case of the smaller cities, this gives a unique opportunity since the number of fatalities is less compared to the larger cities in India. In addition to that, setting up countermeasures is easier if integrated early into the system.

The Approach to Reduction in Road Traffic Fatalities Estimation

In this exercise we attempt to evaluate the effect of the following road safety measures over time in the next 10 years. Three interventions are considered for assessing the impact on traffic safety. These are:

Vehicle safety devices with safety technology.

Enforcement of existing traffic laws with respect to the following specific aspects:

Speed control

Red light running

Seat belt use

Drinking and driving

Road infrastructure improvement for speed control.

Intervention 1: Vehicle Safety Regulations in India

Vehicle safety devices for cars (crashworthiness standards) and motorized two-wheelers (antilock-braking systems (ABS), combined braking systems (CBS), and daytime running lights (DRL)) have shown to reduce fatal crashes. The recent amendments to the Motor Vehicles Act have stipulated these devices along with crashworthiness to be mandatory for cars and MTW.

The Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Government of India, prescribed that front seats of all motor vehicles must be equipped with lap and shoulder belts which took effect on 1 April 1994. Three-wheelers with engine capacity less than 500 cc were exempted. All vehicles sold in India after this date have been equipped with belts in front seats. Installation of seat belts on all rear seats in cars was mandated in September 2002. The government made crashworthiness norms mandatory for all new models of cars from October 2017 and for existing models from October 2019. The new minimum safety norms, including frontal and side crash tests, apply to all cars, and the cars are tested for offset frontal crash norms at 56 km/h and 50 km/h for the side crash test. In general, these crash test norms cannot be complied without the cars being equipped with airbags for front seat occupants.

The Ministry of Road Transport and Highways mandated that all new MTWs sold after 1 April 2017 be equipped with automatic headlamp on (AHO) feature (similar to the daytime running lamps (DRLs)). Antilock braking systems (ABS) were made mandatory for all new MTWs with engine capacity above 125 cc and combined braking system (CBS) mandatory for those below 125 cc which took effect on 1 April 2018.

The number of vehicles produced after 2019 and the proportion of the same in the fleet in subsequent years will determine the effectiveness in terms of the lives saved due to these devices. Since this intervention does not require any intervention from the city administration, it has been included as the first intervention .

Intervention 2: Regulations Regarding Use of Seat Belts and Helmets

The Motors Vehicles Act 1988 (India) made use of helmets mandatory for all MTW riders in the whole country in 1988. Use of seat belts by front seat occupants was made mandatory nationally five years later on 18 March 1999. But the use of seat belts by rear seat occupants was mandated by Motor Vehicles Amendment Act 2019. However, since enforcement of traffic regulations is a state subject in the federal structure of the Indian constitution, traffic regulations have to be notified and enforced by each state. The Delhi Traffic Police made use of seat belts by front seat passengers compulsory which took effect on 15 February 2002 and initiated enforcement of the same.

Even though the Motor Vehicles Act is a central government act, the enforcement of the law by the police authorities is in the purview of state and city law enforcement authorities. This has resulted in a paucity of the law being enforced. The use of seat belts and helmets is responsible for a sizeable decrease in fatalities in road traffic crashes. It is very important to note that since airbags are being installed in all cars produced post-2019, not using a seat belt in a car fitted with airbags can at times lead to an increase in injury to the occupants of the car. Enforcement being a local governance matter and something that can be easily achieved has been taken as the second intervention. Enforcement of seat belts and helmets is relatively easy and does not require any additional training or equipment for the traffic police; drinking and driving enforcement from global experience is not as easy. So we have taken the enforcement of alcohol and narcotic use by the driver as the last intervention.

Intervention 3: Reduction of vehicle speeds and preventing interaction between the vulnerable road users (VRUs) and motorized vehicle have shown great improvements in reduction of fatal road crashes. All these require changes in road infrastructure that have been scientifically designed. The main examples of these changes are conversion of junctions to roundabouts and installing speed controlling devices like speed breakers/rumble strips and speed cameras and pedestrian/bicycle centric infrastructure. These require both capital cost and time along with coordination between multiple local government agencies; because of these limitations, this has been taken as the third intervention. An improvement of 7% per year in installation of these infrastructural changes has been considered to achieve the SDG targets. This requires investment by the city governments; therefore, a low limit of 7% has been assumed.

Methodology of Estimation of Effectiveness of Intervention

The first step was to do a classification of the possible interventions followed by an exhaustive search of the literature to ascertain the effectiveness of the various interventions. Various systematic reviews and meta-analyses published were taken, and for every intervention, the average value of their respective effectiveness was taken for the analysis. Tables 5 , 6 , and 7 show the assumed effectiveness values and the corresponding sources.

The second step was to estimate the population of Patiala City for the years 2019, 2025, and 2030. Simultaneously the vehicle population data was obtained from the Regional Transport Office (RTO) of Patiala City for the years 2012–2017. This was used to calculate the number of vehicles of various modes for the years 2019, 2025, and 2030.

Calculation of Scenarios to Achieve SDG 3.6

Based on the estimates illustrated in Tables 5 – 7 , five scenarios were developed to localize the goals set by SDG 3.6 by the year 2030. The first scenario considers a case when no there are now new safety interventions is taken – business as usual (BAU). Subsequent scenarios take into account the listed interventions additively and showcase the percentage reduction in fatal crashes resulting from each interventions. The five scenarios are:

Business as usual (BAU).

Introduction of vehicle safety devices.

Introduction of vehicle safety devices + seat belt and helmet enforcement.

Introduction of vehicle safety devices + seat belt and helmet enforcement + road infrastructure changes.

Introduction of vehicle safety devices + seat belt and helmet enforcement + road infrastructure changes + driving under influence (DUI) enforcement.

Figures 14 and 15 show the reduction in fatalities for each scenario (for Patiala and Bulandshahr respectively). The results are based on the detailed methodology presented by Mohan et al. (Mohan et al. 2021 ). As can be inferred from Figs. 14 and 15 , the maximum impact in fatality reduction comes from the improvement in road infrastructure. Though this requires both time and monetary investment by the city administration, achieving SDG 3.6 is not possible without this intervention. The quickest and the easiest method to reduce fatal crashes is the enforcement of seat belts and helmets for cars and motorized two-wheelers respectively.

Reduction in road fatalities by 2030 in Patiala

Reduction in road fatalities by 2030 in Bulandshahr

Vehicle Crashworthiness Standards (ECE and NCAP) for Promoting Road Safety Worldwide

In this section, we examine the role of automobile safety standards in decreasing RTI death rates around the world. An important stream in global intervention is in the promotion of universal motor vehicle safety standards. There are two approaches to improving car design: (1) legislation that prescribes requirements with which vehicle manufacturers need to comply and (2) information programs by organizations like NCAP (Global NCAP. http://www.globalncap.org/. Accessed 7 July 2019.) (New Car Assessment Program) around the world (ASEAN NCAP, Euro NCAP, Global NCAP, Latin NCAP, US NCAP, etc.) and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety that provide safety ratings for cars and create a market for safer vehicles.

The WHO Status Report (WHO 2018 ) recommends that all countries should adopt the UNECE WP.29 motor vehicle safety standards and provides a list of eight to be prioritized for implementation by countries (Table 8 ). (WP.29 – Introduction. https://www.unece.org/trans/main/wp29/introduction.html . Accessed 7 July 2019) They also note that “New Car Assessment Programmes (NCAPs) have proved highly effective in raising the levels of vehicle safety significantly above the minimum regulatory requirements.”

The regulatory aspects have the possibility of being applied across the board to vehicles (e.g., for pedestrian safety, including bus-pedestrian). Even though the NCAP safety market applies primarily to occupants, pedestrian test results are a component of the Euro NCAP star rating system, but this is not the case in the USA.

Safer cars have had a major role in reducing RTI fatality rates in HIC over the past 40 years. Estimates for the USA suggest that the fatality risk in the average car or light transport vehicles in 2012 was 56% lower than in the average vehicle on the road in 1960(Kahane 2015). In the USA, there were 33,561 fatalities on roadways in 2012, which means an estimated 45% was prevented due to automobile safety standards. If in a country vehicle occupant deaths contribute only 20% instead of 64% of the total count, then it is possible that reduction in deaths due to automobile safety standards would be less than 15%.

Almost all our understanding of road safety issues derives from the experience of about a hundred years of motorization in the HIC of today. This experience is based on traffic systems where the safety of car occupants remained the central concern. In these countries cars have been the dominant part of traffic systems unlike in many of the LMICs where motorized two-wheeler and para-transit vehicles like three-wheeled taxis (TWT in this paper), tuk-tuks , and jeepneys constitute a significant proportion of traffic on roads. Since we do not have detailed epidemiological studies on the effect of these latter vehicles on traffic safety in LMIC, we do not have a good understanding of the risks faced by occupants of these vehicles where they are a dominant mode of transport.

Figure 16 shows the proportion of car and vulnerable road user (VRU – occupants of 2−/3-wheelers, cyclists, and pedestrians) fatalities in selected countries (for India only – Mohan et al. 2015; WHO 2015 ). In Cambodia, Colombia, India, Sri Lanka, and Thailand, car occupants comprise less than 20% of road traffic fatalities. Even in HICs like Japan, the Netherlands, Hungary, Poland, and Greece, VRUs constitute more than 50% of the fatalities. Figure 17 shows the total population of countries included in Fig. 16 with car occupant fatalities greater than 40% and VRU fatalities greater than 60%. We would probably get similar population ratios if we included all the countries in the world; however, it is not possible to make an accurate assessment as reliable figures for modal share of fatalities are not available for all countries.

Proportion of car and vulnerable road user (VRU: occupants of 2–3-wheelers, cyclists, and pedestrians) fatalities in selected countries. (Source: WHO 2015 ). Data for India from Mohan et al. ( 2015 ))

Population of countries included in Fig. 16 according to proportion of car occupant and VRU fatalities

The above analysis indicates that while it is important to establish the latest level of vehicle safety performance whether by government standards or NCAP-type testing worldwide, it should be noted that this alone will not reduce overall death rates in LMIC as the HIC experience indicates. However, it is important to understand that although improved automobile safety performance may not result in as dramatic a reduction in fatality rates in LMIC as in HIC, hundreds of thousands of people are maimed and killed in cars all over world, and they must have access to the best safety systems available as soon as possible. Another reason why implementation of the latest safety performance in LMIC would be beneficial for car occupants is that many of these countries have a much younger fleet than HIC (Fig. 18 ). While car sales have plateaued in HIC, sales are still increasing in most LMICs. Therefore, early implementation of the latest safety performance would result in a faster fleet replacement with the best safety features in LMIC than in HIC.

Age of cars on the road in India, Sweden, and Japan in 2015

Relationship Between MTW Share in Vehicle Fleet, Pedestrian Exposure, and Fatalities

A thought experiment can be conducted to examine what would happen if the countries with very low fatality rates today had a much higher proportion of MTW in the fleet and a much higher exposure of pedestrians. Here we take the example of India, Japan, and Sweden. India, Japan, and Sweden had fatality rates of ~12, 4.7, and 2.8 per 100,000 persons, respectively, in 2013. If we keep the total number of vehicles constant in Sweden and Japan but change the fleet composition to 75% MTW and 25% cars, double the exposure of pedestrians, and then calculate overall fatality rates using risk of fatalities per unit vehicle and pedestrian per population constant for both countries, then we get the results as shown in Fig. 19 . The estimated results show that the total number of deaths increases significantly in Japan and Sweden and the estimated fatality rates increase to 7 and 8.2, respectively. These estimates indicate that significant gains in traffic safety in HIC are partly due to the reduced exposure of VRU and not only due to the effect of safety policies. Since a large number of LMICs are not likely to reduce VRU exposure significantly in the next decade, exclusive focus on NCAP standards will not produce dramatic results in LMIC as they did in the HIC in the past. This thought experiment also suggests that it may not be possible for LMIC to reduce fatality rates below about 7 per 100,000 population along with high exposure of VRUs unless there are innovative developments in road design and vehicle safety standards including all indigenous intermediate transport vehicles with special emphasis on VRU protection.

Existing fatality rates in India, Japan, and Sweden and estimated rates in Japan and Sweden if they had 75% MTW in their fleet and 2 times the exposure of pedestrians. *Assumption: Occupant risk per vehicle and pedestrian risk per population remain constant

Safety Standards for Vehicles Other than Cars (Not Covered by NCAP at Present)

Safety of para-transit vehicles (three-wheeled scooter taxis).

Studies comparing the safety of large cars with small cars have consistently found that larger cars provide better protection than small cars (Broughton 2008 ; Buzeman et al. 1998 ; Wood 1997 ). All these studies have been done in HIC where cars of all sizes are capable of the same driving speeds. Personal fatality risk for various vehicles in four Indian cities has been calculated by dividing vehicle-specific occupant fatality rates by estimates of the average daily occupancy of each vehicle. The occupancy rates for MTW, car, and TWT were estimated to be 4, 7, and 60 persons, respectively, per day (Chanchani and Rajkotia 2012 ; Mohan and Roy 2003 ; Wilbur Smith Associates 2008 ). The results of these calculations are shown in Fig. 20 (Mohan et al. 2016). Given the present trip lengths for each vehicle type, MTW riders are 3–6 times more at risk than car occupants. The MTW fatality rates per trip in Agra and Vishakhapatnam are much higher than those in the other three cities. The reasons for this are not known at present. At an individual level, risk per trip seems to be the lowest for TWT occupants in all the cities under the assumed occupancy rates and number of trips per day. This is a very surprising finding because average speed of TWT is much lower. TWTs weigh less than a third of cars, have no surrounding steel shell, and have to subscribe to only minimal safety standards.

Fig. 8 . Personal fatality risk per 10 million trips for occupants of motorized two-wheelers, TWT, and cars in four Indian cities. (Source: Mohan et al. 2016 )

Figure 21 shows all the fatalities associated with each vehicle type per 100,000 vehicle km per day. We assumed the following daily travel distance values for the different vehicle types: bus 150 km, car 50 km, TWT 150 km, and MTW 25 km. This is based on trip distances/lengths that each vehicle covers daily. The data include fatalities of occupants and road users other than vehicle occupants. For example, if a motorcycle hits a pedestrian and the pedestrian dies, the pedestrian death is also associated with the motorcycle. This index gives a rough idea of the total number of fatalities one might associate for each vehicle type given the present traffic conditions and mode shares. Essentially, the figures indicate that the low rate for TWT relative to cars is due to the higher number of passengers carried by TWT per day. These indices appear to suggest that, on a travel distance basis, TWT, MTW, and cars may pose roughly similar level of danger to society under the present conditions. Safer design is a pressing concern for TWT, which are threats to both their occupants and the VRU that they impact.

All fatalities associated with each vehicle category per 100,000 vehicle km (estimated) in four Indian cities. (Source: Mohan et al. 2016 )

No previous studies are available on safety records of motor vehicles that are not capable of high speeds operating in mixed traffic in urban areas. TWTs operating in Indian cities have engines smaller in size than 175 cc and generally cannot exceed velocities greater than 50 km/h. The experience of TWT in Indian cities suggests that small lightweight vehicles with limited speed capabilities operating in the urban environment can result in low occupant fatality rates. The lower operating speed of TWT also implies that they pose a much lower risk to pedestrians, bicyclists, and other road users. This issue needs to be studied in greater detail, and if found true, it may be suggested that different crashworthiness standards or NCAP tests need to be developed for low-mass vehicles incapable of operating at speeds greater than 50 km/h. Such vehicles may be optimal for urban use and could be prohibited for roads with speed limits greater than 50 km/h.

It may not be possible for LMIC to reduce fatality rates below about 7 per 100,000 population along with high exposure of VRUs unless there are innovative developments in road design and vehicle safety standards including all indigenous intermediate transport vehicles with special emphasis on VRU protection.

Designs and Specifications

At the operational level, it is the state (public authority) that has the primary obligation for ensuring the people’s right to road safety since the state is granted sovereign powers through the mutual transference of the powers of the citizens to the state by way of a social contract. At the implementation level, both roads and vehicle design, investments in research, and new knowledge generation are required.

Roads have become relatively safer in many high-income countries mostly due to improved geometric standards. Appropriate legislation regarding seat belt use, speed limits, and alcohol control has also contributed to improved safety. Often road standards (geometric design standards) in India have been based on either UK or USA design manuals. There are two important concerns in using or developing highway design standards mainly based on those in use in the USA or UK. The traffic mix for which these standards have been developed is very different from the traffic existing in India. The second concern is whether the design standards in HICs are based on traffic safety science (Hauer 1988 ).

Traffic crash patterns in India are substantially different compared to North America and Western Europe. Pedestrian and motorcyclist involvement in fatal crashes on rural highways is greater than that of other road users. These highway crash patterns are similar to those observed in urban areas. In North America, 10% of the fatal crashes on highways involve pedestrians. The presence of motorcycles is negligible, and long stretches of roads pass through wilderness. A large proportion of the highways is access controlled and designed for four-wheeled motorized traffic. Therefore, the road standards that have evolved to make access controlled highways safe for motorized vehicles may not ensure safety to other road users present on LMIC highways. However, in India standards similar to those in HICs have been adopted (IRC 2007 ; MoRTH 2010 ). In the past two decades, major investments have gone into expanding the national highway system in India. Yet the number of fatalities has continued to grow. The density of highways in a state and the number of fatalities seem to have a strong correlation. There is a strong reason to question the safety aspects of current standards in use.

Hauer ( 1988 ) has made important observations for North American roads: “No road in use is entirely crash-free, and therefore, in the interest of honest human communication no road can be called safe. The safety of a highway does not change abruptly when some highway dimension changes slightly. It follows that meeting or not meeting a dimension standard does not correspond to a road being ‘safe’ or ‘unsafe’. Also, highway design standards evolve with time. We used to build lanes 3.6m (12 feet) wide, now the standard calls for 3.75m wide lanes. This does not mean that the entire stock of old highways with 3.6m lanes is unsafe. It means only that the information, the judgements, and the economic considerations that go into the formulation of design standards change in time. In short, highway design standards are not the demarcation line between what is safe and unsafe. They are a reflection of what a committee of professionals of that time considers to be overall good practice.” These observations are valid for India too. Road standards set by Indian Roads Congress in India are based on committees where the membership includes practicing and retired professionals and academics. IRC does not have a rigorous process of synthesizing results of systematic reviews and scientific studies to propose or modify standards and monitor the impact of new standards.

Road infrastructure improvements (e.g., road upgrading and pavement) and roundabout design are found to be beneficial for safety. In the case of HICs, not only does better vehicle design but also improvements in road safety engineering reduce the severity of whiplash injuries when accidents occur, and this could be done by enhanced signal visibility or through complex intersection geometric upgrades (Navin et al. 2000 ; Perez 2006 ). In the case of countries like India, the safety benefit of roundabouts is clear; however, upgradation involving improved pavement surface, wider lanes, and wider shoulders may lead to higher speeds and increase opportunities for lane changing and conflicts. Pedestrians and slow vehicles on the curbside lane or shoulders will be exposed to motorized vehicles moving at much higher speeds. Safety benefit of road upgradation using the present standards is unclear for Indian highways.

Safe systems approach has three key principles (H. Y. Chen and Meuleners 2011 ; Transport Research Centre 2008 ):

Principle 1 – Recognition of human frailty

Principle 2 – Acceptance of human error

Principle 3 – Creation of a forgiving environment and appropriate crash energy management

Current highway standards for geometric design of highways can be reviewed in the context of these three basic principles. Principles 1 and 2 must recognize that highways in India will have the presence of NMVs and pedestrians along with motorized traffic. Principle 3 becomes the operational principle for setting appropriate speed limits for ensuring a forgiving environment for all road users. Pedestrians will make mistakes in judging the possible risk in the system, whereas drivers can make mistakes in adopting an appropriate speed.

Design speed and design vehicle are the two most important elements which have been used to set highway standards in the past. Stopping distance of a modern car is very different from a tempo (three-wheeler) or two-axle trucks present on Indian highways. Therefore, selection of a design vehicle itself becomes important for setting the minimal standards for stopping distance, sight distance, and overtaking distances.

Design speed governs the design of horizontal curve, vertical curve, and the safe stopping distance. Conventional practice of keeping design speed higher than operational speed has been questioned by several researchers. Therefore, the design speed must be in line with the requirement of principle 3 “Creation of a forgiving environment and appropriate crash energy management.” This implies that for setting appropriate design speed, presence of NMVs, presence of activities along the highway, and density of built up area along the highway and frequency of towns and villages through which the highway passes must be taken into consideration. Design speed may vary from 30 km/h to 90 km/h with a road cross-section designed for appropriate crash energy management depending on the surrounding land use present along the highway.

Speed compliance by design : We started this paper quoting the success of legislation and enforcement; however, taking lessons from a number of studies in HICs, the most effective measure for speed compliance in India will be by design: active speed control measures. India has weak institutional capacity and weak enforcement of legislation; therefore, speed control by texture change, audible markers, rumble strips, change in geometric standards, median designs, lowering speeds at intersections by introducing roundabouts, raised stop lines, and speed humps on minor roads are expected to be more successful in speed compliance by all road users – good drivers, bad drivers, young drivers, knowledgeable drivers, drivers with poor driving education, etc. – ensuring compliance with the principle 2.

Many of the current standards for highway cross-section require revisions (Chen and Meuleners 2011; Mohan et al. 2017b ) to comply with principle 3. Appropriate design of service roads, width of shoulders, and design of medians have to be reviewed to ensure safe designs for NMVs and different kinds of vehicles on the road.

Conclusions

The discussion above suggests that the previously assumed relationships between national incomes and RTI fatality rates (initial increase in deaths with increasing incomes and a subsequent decrease) may not be correct, and national income levels cannot be taken as an excuse for inefficient data collection systems or lack of safety on roads. Therefore, moving toward a target of zero deaths on the roads is a logical policy to be adopted by all countries.

However, we are likely to encounter many obstacles as we try to implement policies underlying Vision Zero:

In most LMICs a large proportion (>60%) of RTI those getting killed in urban areas and on highways vulnerable road users. On the other hand, in the USA an estimated 45% fatalities were prevented due to automobile safety standards and NCAP-type testing. If in a country vehicle occupant deaths contribute only 20% instead of 64% of the total count, then it is possible that reduction in deaths due to automobile safety standards would be less than 15%. Since a large number of LMICs are not likely to reduce VRU exposure significantly in the next decade, exclusive focus on NCAP standards will not produce as dramatic results in LMIC as they did in the HIC in the past. There is a need for the development of suitable vehicle safety standards including all indigenous intermediate transport vehicles.

Significant gains in traffic safety in HIC are partly due to the reduced exposure of VRU and not only due to the effect of safety policies. VRU trips have been reduced in many HICs for various reasons such as land use patterns requiring long commutes, easy access to cars, etc. It may not be possible for LMIC to reduce fatality rates below about 7 per 100,000 population along with high exposure of VRUs unless there are innovative developments in road design (including roundabouts, bicycle lanes, and expressways) with special emphasis on VRU protection.

Fatality rates across cities and countries that have similar income levels can vary greatly. At present we do not know all the reasons behind these variations. It would be important to investigate why rates are so different across cities in the same country. These findings might give us new clues on planning for Vision Zero.

The issue of serious injuries and fatalities among pedestrians hit by motorcycles has not received much attention internationally. Since the use of motorized two-wheeler for personal transport and deliveries is increasing in a large number of countries, it is necessary to give greater attention to safer motorcycle design and management of their movement on city roads.

Very little effort has gone into the development of new knowledge, road designs, or vehicle safety specifications in most LMICs. Local research capabilities and resources for scientific research remain low.

Because of these reasons, road safety priorities may have to be very different in India and many other countries, and some new safety interventions would have to be developed to move toward Vision Zero. Translating Vision Zero requires efforts at several levels. At a very macro level, it involves the concept of “right to safety” enshrined in our constitution. A “right” to safety can exist only when there exists a relationship between individuals or groups using a product or services and the provider of those products or services. Constitutions of most countries ensure that their citizens have a right to life, and it is this right that gets translated into a right to live free from debilitating injury. Article 21 of the Constitution of India, 1950, provides that, “No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law.” “Life” in Article 21 of the Constitution is not merely the physical act of breathing. It does not connote mere animal existence or continued drudgery through life. It has a much wider meaning which includes right to live with human dignity, right to livelihood, right to health, right to pollution-free air, etc. Individuals and communities need to understand that a right to safety on the road is as valid as a right to clean air or a right to live free of small pox, polio, or malaria.

The first step forward would be for policy-makers in all countries to acknowledge that road users have a right to expect that state decisions affecting their safety should be based on fact-based expectation of the safety consequences of such decisions. This would require every policy, law, or safety standard (concerning roads, vehicles, or traffic management) established by the state to be accompanied by a justification for the same by including systematic reviews of the scientific evidence used for the decision and the expected safety benefits in numerical estimates. The document would have to include information on what effects that measure would have on all road users and non-road users on their daily lives. These documents would obviously have to be placed in the public domain.

The second step would be for manufacturers of vehicles and other road-based technologies to explicitly state the quality and limits of the safety features embedded in their technologies. For example, a car manufacturer would have to state that the car has been tested for frontal impacts at say 60 km/h, that its speed reduces fatality rates by approximately x%, and that it may not be as safe at speeds above that limit.

The third step would be for international agencies dealing with road safety (state and non-state) to examine all sources of systematic reviews of road safety interventions and use them to justify the policies they pursue. They should also make it explicit that they will fund road safety activity by non-government organizations only if they promote interventions justified by scientific evidence. If they diverge from available evidence, then they must provide justification for doing so.

The proposed measures should help us move in a path that leads us to a situation that actually establishes Vision Zero as a right enjoyed by all road users and the accompanying obligations of the state and the private sector that accompany that right. The exact modalities of implementing the suggestions successfully will only come with experience.

AASHTO. (2010). Highway safety manual (1st ed.). Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.

Google Scholar  

Briscoe, S. (2004). Raising the bar: Can increased statutory penalties deter drink-drivers? Accident Analysis & Prevention, 36 (5), 919–929.

Article   Google Scholar  

Broughton, J. (2008). Car driver casualty rates in Great Britain by type of car. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40 (4), 1543–1552.

Buzeman, D. G., Viano, D. C., & Lovsund, P. (1998). Car occupant safety in frontal crashes: A parameter study of vehicle mass, impact speed, and inherent vehicle protection. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 30 (6), 713–722.

Chanchani, R., & Rajkotia, F. (2012). A study of the autorickshaw sector in Bangalore city . Retrieved from Bangalore:

Chen, H. Y., & Meuleners, L. (2011) . A literature review of road safety strategies and the safe system approach. Retrieved from Perth: http://c-marc.curtin.edu.au/local/docs/CMARC_SafeSystemReview.pdf

Committee. (2007, 20080/07/22/) . Report of the Committee on Road Safety and Traffic Management .

Dandona, R., Kumar, G. A., Gururaj, G., James, S., Chakma, J. K., Thakur, J. S., et al. (2020). Mortality due to road injuries in the states of India: The global burden of disease study 1990–2013;2017. The Lancet Public Health, 5 (2), e86–e98. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(19)30246-4 .

Elvik, R. (2016). Association between increase in fixed penalties and road safety outcomes: A meta-analysis. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 92 , 202–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.03.028 .

Gibson, J. J. (1961). The contribution of experimental psychology to the formulation of the problem of safety—A brief for basic research. In Behavioral approaches for accident research (pp. 77–89). New York: Association for the Aid of Crippled Children.

Haddon, W., Jr. (1963). A note concerning accident theory and research with special reference to motor vehicle accidents. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 107 , 635–646.

Haddon, W., Jr. (1968). The changing approach to the epidemiology, prevention, and amelioration of trauma: The transition to approaches etiologically rather than descriptively based. American Journal of Public Health and the Nation’s Health, 58 (8), 1431–1438.

Haddon, W., Jr. (1970). On the escape of tigers: An ecologic note. American Journal of Public Health, 60 (12), 2229–2234.

Haddon, W., Jr. (1980). Advances in the epidemiology of injuries as a basis for public policy. Public Health Reports, 95 (5), 411–421.

Hauer, E. (1988). A case for science-based road safety design and management. Paper presented at the Highway safety: at the crossroads: Proceedings of a conference.

IRC. (2007). Manual of specifications & standards . New Delhi: Indian Roads Congress.

Menon, G. R., Singh, L., Sharma, P., Yadav, P., Sharma, S., Kalaskar, S., et al. (2019). National Burden Estimates of healthy life lost in India, 2017: An analysis using direct mortality data and indirect disability data. The Lancet Global Health, 7 (12), e1675–e1684.

Mohan, D. (2003). Road traffic injuries: A neglected pandemic. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 81 , 684–685.

Mohan, D., Bangdiwala, S. I., & Villaveces, A. (2017a). Urban street structure and traffic safety. Journal of Safety Research, 62 , 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2017.06.003 .

Mohan, D., Jha, A., & Chauhan, S. S. (2021). Future of road safety and SDG 3.6 goals in six Indian cities. IATSS research, 45 (1), 12–18.

Mohan, D., & Roy, D. (2003). Operating on three wheels. Economic & Political Weekly, XXXVIII (03), 177–180.

Mohan, D., Tiwari, G., & Bhalla, K. (2015). Road safety in India: Status report . Retrieved from New Delhi: http://tripp.iitd.ernet.in/road_safety_in_India_status_report.pdf .

Mohan, D., Tiwari, G., & Bhalla, K. (2017b). Road safety in India: Status report 2016. Retrieved from New Delhi:

Mohan, D., Tiwari, G., & Mukherjee, S. (2016). Urban traffic safety assessment: A case study of six Indian cities. IATSS research, 39 (2), 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2016.02.001 .

MoRTH. (2010). Manual for specifications and standards for four laning of highways . Retrieved from New Delhi:

Navin, F., Zein, S., & Felipe, E. (2000). Road safety engineering: An effective tool in the fight against whiplash injuries. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 32 (2), 271–275.

Norman, L. G. (1962). Road traffic accidents: Epidemiology, control, and prevention. Retrieved from Geneva: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/39723/?sequence=1 .

Palit, S. K. (1998). The development of engineering and technical education in India. Global Journal of Engineering Education, 2 , 317–326.

Perez, I. (2006). Safety impact of engineering treatments on undivided rural roads. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 38 (1), 192–200.

Perrow, C. (1984). Normal accidents: Living with high risk systems . New York: Basic Books.

Technical Group on Population Projections. (2006). Populatioen projections for India and states 2001–2026 . Retrieved from New Delhi:

Tingvall, C. (1997). The zero vision. A road transport system free from serious health losses. In H. Holst von, è. Nygren & R. Thord (Eds.), Transportation, traffic safety and health (pp. 37–57). Berlin: Springer Verlag. (Reprinted from: NOT IN FILE).

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Tingvall, C. (1998). The Swedish ‘Vision Zero’ and how Parliamentary approval was obtained. Paper presented at the road safety research, policing, education conference, 1998, Wellington, New Zealand, Vol 1.

Tingvall, C., & Haworth, N. (1999). Vision zero-an ethical approach to safety and mobility.

Tiwari, G. (2015). Highway safety in India . Retrieved from New Delhi:

Transport Research Centre. (2008). Towards zero: Ambitious road safety targets and the safe system approach . Retrieved from Paris: www.internationaltransportforum.org

“Vision Zero” in perspective of global generalization. (1998, 2000).

WHO. (2015). Global status report on road safety 2015 . Retrieved from Geneva:

WHO. (2018). Global status report on road safety 2018 (9241565683). Retrieved from Geneva:

Wilbur Smith Associates. (2008). Study on traffic and transportation policies and strategies in urban areas in India – Final report . Retrieved from New Delhi:

Wood, D. P. (1997). Safety and the car size effect: A fundamental explanation. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 29 (2), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(96)00067-X .

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, India

Geetam Tiwari

Indian Institute of Technology/Independent Council for Road Safety International, Delhi, India

Dinesh Mohan

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and affiliations.

KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Stockholms Län, Sweden

Karin Edvardsson Björnberg

Swedish Transport Administration, Borlänge, Sweden

Matts-Åke Belin

KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Division of Philosophy, Stockholm, Stockholms Län, Sweden

Sven Ove Hansson

Chalmers Tekniska Högskola, Göteborg, Västra Götalands Län, Sweden

Claes Tingvall

Rights and permissions

Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s)

About this entry

Cite this entry.

Tiwari, G., Mohan, D. (2022). Traffic Safety in India and Vision Zero. In: Edvardsson Björnberg, K., Belin, MÅ., Hansson, S.O., Tingvall, C. (eds) The Vision Zero Handbook. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23176-7_22-1

Download citation

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23176-7_22-1

Received : 01 July 2021

Accepted : 21 July 2021

Published : 20 October 2022

Publisher Name : Springer, Cham

Print ISBN : 978-3-030-23176-7

Online ISBN : 978-3-030-23176-7

eBook Packages : Springer Reference Political Science and International Studies Reference Module Humanities and Social Sciences Reference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

• Publish with us

Policies and ethics

• Find a journal
• Track your research

Road Safety Good Practices in India: Report shares insights

Dec 19, 2023 | Asia Pacific , General , LAC , News

The Ministry of Road Transport and Highways ( MORTH ) and SaveLIFE Foundation , supported by Bloomberg Philanthropies Initiative for Global Road Safety ( BIGRS ), have released a Road Safety Good Practices in India Report to explore and document replicable best practice achieving impact in curbing the alarming toll of road crash injury in the country.

Use of the iRAP methodology and tools to eliminate high-risk roads in India since 2011 features heavily in the report. iRAP is recognised as an important data-driven intervention to understand infrastructure risk before and after road upgrades, and support road safety decision-making, investment and policy.

The locally owned and led IndiaRAP Programme has been supporting the life-saving work of road safety partners in the country – including the government, development banks, mobility clubs, road safety NGOs, research organisations and industry – since its launch in 2017.

India, with its complex road dynamics and high fatality rates, is at a crossroads. Various State Governments are actively addressing the significant issue of reducing road crash deaths through innovative strategies.

The report highlights good practices, including 13 case studies across 10 states.

iRAP features in many of these including:

• Belgaum Yaragatti Highway’s Safe Corridor Demonstration Project (SCDP), Karnataka – recorded a 54% reduction in deaths from 2015 to 2018 (Case Study 1)
• Kazhakoottam-Adoor (SH-1) Safe Corridor Demonstration Project (SCDP), Kerala – recorded a 46% reduction in deaths from 2013 to 2021 (Case Study 2)
• Renigunta-Kadapa Stretch (SH-31), Andhra Pradesh (Case Study 5) – recorded a 22% reduction in deaths from 2012 to 2015 (Case Study 5)
• Bharuch-Dehgam Corridor, Gandhinagar-Koba-Indira Bridge, Mehsana Himatnagar Highway, Gujarat – resulted in improved safety standards (Case Study 8)
• Uthiramerur – Kannamangalam Corridor (SH 118A) Tamil Nadu Road Sector Project II, Tamil Nadu – resulted in improved safety standards (Case Study 9)

The NH 48 (Old Mumbai-Pune Highway) Zero Fatality Corridor (ZFC) project also features which registered a remarkable 61% decrease in fatalities between 2018 and 2021.

The report’s good practices were selected based on specific criteria, including sustained reductions in road crash fatalities during the project implementation period, efforts to strengthen institutions for efficient road safety management, and the implementation of robust mechanisms across the 4Es of road safety (Engineering, Education, Enforcement, and Emergency Care).

Included interventions have been categorised as corridor-based, network-based, and state-based, and aim to provide ready working knowledge to support replication  of the interventions in similar high-crash zones across India.

This new essential evidence-based reference guide aims to facilitate cross-functional knowledge exchange, foster collaborative actions, and aid the development of improved policies and practices. It will empower State and city-level authorities to undertake more informed initiatives to enhance road safety outcomes.

To download the report, click here .

For more information on the work of IndiaRAP, click here .

Search News Archives

The International Road Assessment Programme (iRAP) is a Registered Charity with UN ECOSOC Consultative Status. iRAP is registered in England and Wales under company number 05476000 Charity number 1140357

Registered office: 60 Trafalgar Square, London, WC2N 5DS GET IN TOUCH │ Europe │ Africa │ Asia Pacific │ Latin America and Caribbean │ North America

Do you want to stay in touch?

Would you like to hear from us more to get the big picture on iRAP’s latest work in promoting and creating safer roads worldwide?

WrapUp, our free bi-monthly digital newsletter is just what you need.  It’s packed with inspirational stories about the life-saving work  of our partners around the world.

Road Survey

Using specially equipped vehicles, software and trained personnel, iRAP Inspections involve detailed road surveys and data collection. These focus on more than 50 different road attributes that are known to influence the likelihood of a crash and its severity.

These attributes include intersection design, the number of lanes and markings, roadside hazards, footpaths and bicycle facilities. The road inspection data underpins iRAP Star Ratings and Safer Road Investment Plans.

What we see when we look at a road

Safer roads are becoming the new policy norm for investors and development agencies worldwide. This creates exciting opportunities for roads professionals and the road safety community to work together to save lives.

Building all new roads to a 3-star or better standard for all road users saves lives and makes great business sense. Upgrading existing roads to maximise travel on 3-star or better roads is also practical, cost-effective and starts saving lives right away. iRAP provides the business case for investment and the tools to maximise lives saved.

Let’s work together to create a safer, better world!

How we improve roads

Our life-saving products, how 3-star or better roads save lives, shaping safer road policy.

We need a strong policy framework and ambitious global targets if we are to deliver safer roads that save people’s lives.

iRAP and its partners are working with international bodies, national governments and highways agencies to build a global policy consensus for safer roads.

In 2015, the United Nations included halving road deaths and serious injuries as a Sustainable Development Goal (3.6). This game-changing move put road deaths centre stage – where they belong – as a global development issue, alongside poverty reduction targets and the right to clean water.

Now, the challenge is to build on this momentum. The UN Secretary General has recommended all new roads should be built to a 3-star or better standard and existing roads upgraded. The establishment of a Safer Roads Fund to maximise travel on 3-star or better roads can provide international finance institutions, health organisations, treasury officials, road executives and road builders with the social and economic basis for safer, sustainable roads.

Let’s work together to create a world free of high-risk roads and save lives!

How iRAP is shaping Safer Roads Policies

Saving lives worldwide.

Road crashes are the leading cause of death for young people aged between 15-29 years. Road crashes cost an estimated 2-5% of GDP in each and every country worldwide. Like other global health problems the Vaccines for Roads exist and it is just a question of the scale of our response.

iRAP is working to support the scaling up of action worldwide and reduce this tragic toll by enabling low-cost infrastructure solutions that make our roads safer. Safer roads also make sound business sense. Dollar for dollar, safer roads provide one of the highest possible, job-creating public investments a country can make in health and infrastructure policy.

How iRAP Are Working to Save Lives

Supporting all road users.

We want safer roads for all road users: pedestrians, bicyclists, motorcyclists and vehicle occupants.

The road improvement programmes we enable make your roads safer. Because every road environment – and the community it serves – is unique, each life-saving plan we develop is unique too!

iRAP is at the cutting edge of bespoke solutions for safer mobility worldwide, regardless of how you move from A to B. Our work is making roads safer for you and your families, your community and your company.

Campaign for safer roads!

Star rating for schools, 3-star or better save lives, star rating a road design.

The Star Rating of a Road Design can be completed as a stand-alone activity. The process is being used by road agencies, development banks and design consultants to objecitvely specify and measure the safety of a road design for all road users.

The process offers an opportunity for road owners to set a performance based star rating target for all road users (e.g. the new road must be minimum 4-star standard for pedestrians and cyclists and minimum 3-star standard for motorcyclists and vehicle occupants). It has been successfully used in conjunction with existing mechanisms such as Road Safety Audits and compliance with road design standards.

The impact on risk of various design iterations can also be explored to help harness the potential of designers to find creative solutions to challenging safety problems.

The University of Birmingham

The University of Birmingham (UK) iRAP course in Road Safety introduces people to the iRAP technology for evaluating the safety impact of road infrastructure.

By the end of the course, the participants are expected to have acquired an understanding of the following key items:

• The fundamentals of the iRAP approach to risk assessment and mitigation
• The concept of star rating based on inspection data and road designs
• The principles of developing a safer roads investment plan

The course includes practical exercises, discussions and exposure to the iRAP   software. The course is delivered in the state-of-the-art teaching and learning facilities of the University of Birmingham.

Enroll in the University of Birmingham course now.

RAPcapacity

RAPcapacity online courses help people learn how to undertake iRAP-specification road assessments.

• The courses available are:
• Getting started and accessing results
• Risk Mapping and Performance Tracking
• Star Rating and Investment Plans from inspections
• Star Rating and Investment Plans from design
• Road attribute coding

Take an online RAPCapacity course now.

Share this post with your friends!

• GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
• Skip to Main Content

MoRTH All Portals

Mission / vision, who's who, organization history, allocation of business, wings / divisions, organisation chart, citizen charter, induction material, channel of submission of files in morth, autonomous bodies / societies / public sector undertakings, related organizations, list of holidays, about highways, national highway details, standard documents, major programmes / project.

• Bharatmala Phase-I
• Connectivity in LWE Area
• Vijayawada Ranchi
• Char Dham Pariyojana
• SARDP including Arunachal Pradesh Package
• Setu Bharatam
• Externally Aided Projects

National Highways Excellence Awards

Green highways, financial sanctions, land acquisition.

• Gazette Notification

Suggestive format for collection and reporting of data using Network Survey Vehicle (NSV) for Guidance purpose

Signature projects, research schemes, new material / technology on nh.

• Presentations in Workshop

Invitation of public comments for access permission to Fuel Stations, Retails Outlets, etc.

• Minutes of Meeting

Online Permissions for Movement of Over Weight and Over Dimensional (OW/OD) Consignment

Circulars / notifications related to national highways, circulars / notifications related to debarment / blacklisting, national highway declaration notifications, national highway entrustment notifications, national highway user fee (toll) notifications, related act / rules, arbitral award, internship of b.tech/ m.tech civil engineering students in national highway projects, road transport, introduction, national permit system, cross border movement agreements, circulars / notifications related to road transport, circulars / notifications related to motor vehicle legislation, gazette notifications related to motor vehicle legislation, voluntary vehicle fleet modernization program (vvmp) / vehicle scrapping policy.

• Circulars / Notifications related to Vehicle Scrapping Policy
• Vehicle Scrapping Policy Overview
• State Level Notifications

Automotive Industry Standards (AIS)

Initiatives, list of approved vehicle location tracking device manufacturers, m-parivahan portal, parivahan sewa portal, state transport departments websites, road safety.

• About Road Safety
• Road Accidents Dashboard
• Circulars / Notifications related to Road Safety

Presentations / Reports

• World Bank's Report on Environmental and Social Systems Assessment (ESSA)
• Sundar Committee Report
• Presentations of Working Groups on Road Safety
• Reports of Working Group on 4 E's of Road Safety
• Group of Ministers on Road Safety and Road Transport
• National Road Safety Council
• Presentations made on 22.04.2016 for Finalization of the agenda for Group of Ministers
• Good Samaritan
• Activities on Road Safety
• National Road Safety Policy
• Road Safety Engineering Cell
• Circulars related to Road Safety Engineering Cell
• Schemes / Projects
• Knowledge / Resource
• Black Spots

Acts / Rules

The control of national highways (land and traffic) act, 2002, the carriage by road act, 2007, the national highways authority of india act, 1988, the national highways act, 1956, the national highways authority of india (the term of office and other conditions of service of members) rules, 2003 & its amendments, related act administered by various other ministries /states, the road transport corporations act, 1950, the stage-carriages act, 1861, the central motor vehicles rules, 1989, the motor vehicles act, 1988, the central road and infrastructure fund act, 2000, notifications, gazette notifications.

• NH Entrustment
• Motor Vehicle Legislation
• NH Declaration

Circulars / other Notifications

Circulars from establishment and other sections, citizen corner, cyber crime related video gallery, har ghar tiranga campaign, dhabas/truck repair shops opened during covid-19, covid-19 grievances, public grievances, public grievances portal, reporting of cyber crime, monthly summary of principal activities of the ministry, right to information (rti), publications, annual report on motor vehicle accident fund & compensation to victims of hit & run motor accidents scheme, 2022, annual reports, annual reports of iahe, performance of state road transport undertakings (srtus), road accidents in india, a booklet on gst in transport sector, annual reports of nhidcl, road transport year book, results framework document (rfd), path bharti, basic road statistics of india, outcome budget, detailed demands for grants, irc publications, e-tenders (morth), e-tenders (morth - world bank related), tenders (offline).

Search form

You are here.

The Government constituted a Committee under the Chairmanship of Shri S. Sundar, Former Secretary (MoST) in the year 2005 to deliberate and make recommendations on creation of a dedicated body on road safety and traffic management. The Committee was also subsequently requested to finalise a draft National Road Safety Policy for consideration of the Government. The Committee while submitting its report in February, 2007 inter alia, recommended a draft National Road Safety Policy. Based on the recommendations of Sunder Committee, the Union Cabinet on 15.03.2010 approved National Road Safety Policy. The National Road Safety Policy outlines the policy initiatives to be framed / taken by the Government at all levels to improve the road safety activities in the country. The National Road Safety Policy is as under :-

• The Government of India is deeply concerned about the growth in the number of road accidents, injuries and fatalities in recent years. It recognizes that road accidents have now become a major public health issue, and the victims are mainly the poor and vulnerable road users.
• The Government of India further recognizes that as road accidents involve roads, motor vehicles as also the human beings, road safety needs to be addressed on a holistic basis. It also recognizes that regardless of jurisdiction*-s, the Central and State Governments have a joint responsibility in reducing the incidence of road accidents, injuries and fatalities.
• In the light of this, the Government of India, through this National Road Safety Policy, states its commitment to bring about a significant reduction in mortality and morbidity resulting from road accidents.

Policy Statements

In order to achieve a significant improvement in road safety, the Government of India is committed to:

Raise Awareness about Road Safety Issues

The Government would increase its efforts to promote awareness about the various aspects of road safety, the social and economic implications of road accidents and what needs to be done to curb the rising menace of road accidents. This would enable and empower the different stakeholders to play a meaningful role in promoting road safety.

Establish a Road Safety Information Database

The Government will provide assistance to local bodies, Union Territories and States to improve the quality of crash investigation and of data collection, transmission and analysis. A National Road Safety Information System will be established for providing continuity and policy guidelines to this activity.

Ensure Safer Road Infrastructure

The Government will take measures to review standards pertaining to safety in the design of rural and urban roads and bring them in consonance with international best practices keeping in view Indian traffic conditions. Continuing application of Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) under a national framework to establish a safe and efficient transport system will be encouraged.

Safer Vehicles

The Government will take steps to ensure that safety features are built in at the stage of design, manufacture, usage, operation and maintenance of both motorized and non-motorized vehicles in line with international standards and practices in order to minimize adverse safety and environmental effects of vehicle operation on road users (including pedestrians and bicyclists) and infrastructure.

Safer Drivers

The Government will strengthen the system of driver licensing and training to improve the competence and capability of drivers.

The Government will take measures to review standards pertaining to safety in the design of rural and urban roads and bring them in consonance with international best practices keeping in view Indian traffic conditions. Continuing application of Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) under a

Safety of Vulnerable Road Users

The design and construction of all road facilities (rural and urban) will take into account the needs of non-motorized transport and the vulnerable and physically challenged in an appropriate manner. The Government will seek to disseminate ‘best practices’ in this regard to town planners, architects, and highway and traffic engineers.

National framework to establish a safe and efficient transport system will be encouraged.

Road Traffic Safety Education and Training

Road safety knowledge and awareness will be created amongst the population through education, training and publicity campaigns. Road safety education will also focus on school children and college going students, while road safety publicity campaigns will be used to propagate good road safety practices among the community. The Government will encourage all professionals associated with road design, road construction, road network management, traffic management and law enforcement to attain adequate knowledge of road safety issues.

Enforcement of Safety Laws

The Government will take appropriate measures to assist various state and other governments to strengthen and improve the quality of enforcement in order to ensure effective and uniform implementation of safety laws. The Government will actively encourage the establishment and strengthening of highway Patrolling on National and State Highways in cooperation with State Governments and Union Territories as appropriate.

Emergency Medical Services for Road Accidents

The Government will strive to ensure that all persons involved in road accidents benefit from speedy and effective trauma care and management. The essential functions of such a service would include the provision of rescue operation and administration of first aid at the site of an accident and the transport of the victim from accident site to nearby hospital. Hospitals alongside the National Highways and State Highways would be adequately equipped to provide for trauma care and rehabilitation.

HRD & Research for Road Safety

The Government will encourage increased activity in programmes of road safety research by identifying priority areas, funding research in those areas adequately and establishing centers of excellence in research and academic institutions. The Government will facilitate dissemination of the result of research and identified examples of good practices through publication, training, conferences, workshops and websites.

Strengthening Enabling Legal, Institutional and Financial Environment for Road Safety

The Government will take appropriate measures to ensure that the required legal, institutional and financial environment for road safety is further strengthened and a mechanism for effective coordination of various stakeholders is put in place. The reforms in these areas would provide for the active and extensive participation of the community at large, of the private sector, academia and NGOs.

Implementation Strategy

Implementation Strategy The Government has decided to establish a dedicated agency viz. a National Road Safety Board to oversee the issues related to road safety and evolve effective strategies for implementation of the Road Safety Policy. The Government has also decided to establish a National Road Safety Fund to finance road activities through the allocation of a certain percentage of the cess on gasoline and diesel.

Occupational Road Safety in India

Apr 05, 2019

870 likes | 1.19k Views

Occupational Road Safety in India. Presentation By : DR PARAM PREET GHUMAN MBBS, PGDHA, MBA Senior Medical Officer Employee State Insurance Corporation India. “Health of the Nation is more important than the wealth of the Nation”. Road safety is a major public health concern.

Share Presentation

• indian road network
• traffic lights
• road traffic crash complete
• organized wayside amenities
• less practice

Presentation Transcript

Presentation By : DR PARAM PREET GHUMAN MBBS, PGDHA, MBA Senior Medical Officer Employee State Insurance Corporation India

“Health of the Nation is more important than the wealth of the Nation” • Road safety is a major public health concern. • Indian road network is second longest in the world covering more than 3 million Kilometers. • 80% of road length consists of village and other roads and 12% constitutes major districts roads. • 85% of passenger loads and 70% of freight load is carried by road. • As per 2004 data there were 72.7 million vehicles on roads and vehicle fleets are doubling after every 6 to 7 years. • Financial outlay for road transport sector during 10th plan i.e. 2002-2007 was 9416.90 crores.

Types of vehicles plying on Indian roads along with their wrong usage according to their capacity is a matter of great concern for road safety. These vehicles create traffic chaos and are a cause of road crashes.Few examples are :--

A mini shop on a cycle

Carriage of goods on Horse carts

Wrong loading of Jeep

Wrong sitting posture of a man in a goods carrier

Traffic Mix…!

Load volume larger than the vehicle

Labourer carrying a special ladder (Gohri) and his material on cycle

Carrying animal on a motor cycle

Jeep with over capacity of passengers

Road Accidents in India (In Thousands)

India has only 1 % of world vehicle population, but accounts for 6 % of the accidents and 10 % fatalities due to road traffic injuries. • Total economic loss to society on account of road accidents is estimated to be Rs. 55000 crores per annum. • In India 11 % of deaths due to non communicable diseases are due to injuries and 78 % of these injury deaths are due to road traffic crashes. Hence road safety becomes important responsibility of the governments.

Factors affecting Road Traffic Crashes:-- • Types of roads and road users. • Colliding vehicles. • Environment and road related factors like road geometry, design, visibility, diversions etc. • Vehicle related causing traffic mix.

Composition and flow of road traffic. • Adherence / enforcement of road safety regulations. • Unsafe driving behavior. • Traffic congestion caused by increased use of private mode of transport and less practice of vehicle pooling. • Highway capacity shortages (National Highways constitute less than 2 % of the road length of the country but carry 40 % of road based traffic). • Lack of valid and fake driving licenses • Nature of traffic management.

Over loading of vehicles particularly trucks and tractor trolleys. Improper and overloading

Improper and overloading

Overloaded trolley

Vertical overload

Bottle necks in Road Safety:- • Drivers especially of heavy vehicles operate under inhospitable conditions which induces high levels of stress and possibility of accidents. • No organized wayside amenities, maintenance and repair facilities. • Coverage of extra long distances by drivers leading to fatigue and long spells of absence from home leading to emotional and sexual deprivation causing increased mental stress. • Concessions given to drivers by wayside eateries also known as “Dhabas” in the form of free food and alcohol for their own profit.

Lack of parking space alongside highways leading to parking on roads.

Inexperienced, untrained and underage, cyclists and rickshaw pullers on the road with no separate path for them. • Presence of beggars on busy road junctions and traffic lights. • Use of mobile phones while driving. • Drug addiction. • Presence of wine outlets near the roads. • Sale of lotteries, helmets etc near roadside.

Presence of slums near the roads.

Selling of fruits on road side.

Sale of Jaggery near the road.

Sale of small items like tissue papers, agarbatis, Christmas caps, car shades, balloons, newspapers, magazines etc on traffic light.

Roads used as dumping place for construction material.

Dangers to Road safety due to religious reasons :-- • Astrologers, palmists, tarot card readers etc. advise people to do certain rituals known as “Upaayays” which cause traffic chaos. eg. throwing something in flowing rivers, placing certain things on centre of the road or at cross junctions etc. • Practice of donating money on certain specific days of the week in the name of religion and presence of these donation seekers on busy roads and traffic lights eg people on Saturday worship Saturday God known as “Shani Devta” and there are special persons known as “Dandaut” who dress up specially and hold a utensil in hand containing mustard oil and a iron casting of Saturday God. • Partial encroachment of roads in the name of religion by building religious structures which may be small or big. • Creating indigenous road blocks for organizing religious community kitchens also known as “Langars” . • Organizing religious community kitchens on road and participation by overenthusiastic devotees on road.

Fulfilling of myth…A Traffic hazard

Collecting donation in the name of religion (Saturday God)

Person donating alms in name of “Saturday God”

Creating road blocks for religious functions

Devotees stopping vehicles for serving food etc.

Other Threats to Road Safety :- • Movement of animals on busy roads - • Flouting of rules by road users. • No separate pathway for the non motorized transport and pedestrians. • Poor visibility due to fog. • Parking of any type of vehicle at own convenience. • Playing mischief on road (specially with women drivers) while driving. • Seeking attention on road by playing gimmicks like leaving the handle while driving, standing while driving etc. • Use of pressure horns or horns with loud and funny noises. • Listening to loud music etc.

Animals roaming on roads

Poor visibility and no separate pathway for pedestrians

Playing mischief on road

Person carrying helmet in hand during riding

Where is the helmet ?

Cause for chaos on Road

Road Traffic Injuries cause:-- • Death. • Disability. • Hospitalization. • High Social and economic costs which include medical costs, cost related to administration, Legal and police expenditure, collateral damage in terms of damage to property and motor vehicles, loss due to income forgone rising out of absence from work or disability. • In 2005, there were 4.4 Lakh road accidents leading to death of 94,968 persons i.e. there was one road accident every minute and one road accident death every 6 minutes. • Quality of life of accident survivors becomes poor as they live with pain and suffering.

Transport Sector Road Designers Road Traffic Crash Civic Agencies Health Sector Insurance Sector Legal Sectors Automobile Manufacturers Multisectorial Involvement in Road Traffic Crash Complete co-ordination in all these sectors is needed for the rescue, transportation, trauma care and relief, investigation and compilation of data to achieve total road safety in the interest of road users.

Removes injured to the hospital after giving first aid and pre-hospital care where ever possible. Road Traffic crash • Informer Police Control Room (PCR) PCR Van or Ambulance Traffic Police • Police Station Flow of information in case of road traffic crash:--

Sign board for emergency help

• More by User

State of Occupational Road Safety Globally – Policy Perspective

State of Occupational Road Safety Globally – Policy Perspective Claes Tingvall Professor, Dr Med Sc Director of Traffic Safety Swedish Road Administration International Conference on Road Safety at Work, Washington, DC 2009 Presentation prepared in cooperation with Anders Lie, SRA

1.03k views • 25 slides

Occupational Road Risk

Occupational Road Risk. Health and safety issues for vehicles and drivers Mike Lewis MIOSH, RSP. Introduction. For the majority of us, the most dangerous thing we do is drive on the public highway. Accident Statistics (UK 2003). 3,508 persons killed 33,707 seriously injured

787 views • 26 slides

Occupational Health & Safety

Asls is a fire safety consultancy in Australia that provides different fire safety, mining and traffic management courses that will help you to manage safety in your organization.

533 views • 6 slides

Road Safety in Japan

416 views • 15 slides

ROAD SAFETY

ROAD SAFETY. Seminar on sustainable road safety management A 5 day seminar including workshops and trainings. Duration : 5 days from 10.00- 17.00 1. Target group: Road Safety Professionals (Management, Project Leaders Coordinators, Experts ) and Road Safety Volunteers

1.01k views • 17 slides

Road Safety

Road Safety. Not as dull as you might expect I hope!. How many of you have used a slingshot? How many a Bow and Arrow? How many a Air Rifle? How many a M achine gun?. Scale – Putting things in perspective. Drivers in reported accidents Car Drivers

375 views • 14 slides

State of Occupational Road Safety Globally – Policy Perspective. Claes Tingvall Professor, Dr Med Sc Director of Traffic Safety Swedish Road Administration International Conference on Road Safety at Work, Washington, DC 2009 Presentation prepared in cooperation with Anders Lie, SRA.

445 views • 25 slides

Occupational Safety Hazards

Occupational Safety Hazards. Occupational Safety Hazards in the Food Service Industry. Occupational safety and health (OSH) is increasingly recognized by governments and international organizations as an important part of public health.

1.41k views • 30 slides

ROAD SAFETY IN UGANDA

ROAD SAFETY IN UGANDA. Presented by PATRICK SANYA COMMISSIONER TRANSPORT REGULATION MINISTRY OF WORKS AND TRANSPORT. CONTENTS. INTRODUCTION SITUATION OF ROAD SAFETY IN UGANDA CAUSES OF ACCIDENTS INITIATIVES TAKEN IN UGANDA TO REDUCE ROAD ACCIDENTS

611 views • 16 slides

Occupational Road Risk. Assisted driving for apprentices. A simple and innovative device. Key figures :. First cause of ocupational accidents in construction 14 % of mortal accidents Around 2 000 death in 2007 a constant preoccupation.

225 views • 7 slides

Prediction in Road Safety

Prediction in Road Safety. 1. What is Prediction and When is it Needed?. a. When setting safety targets, predict what would be safety in the future if no new initiatives will be taken.

310 views • 15 slides

Road Safety. Keeping me safe. What do these signs mean?. How do we cross the road safely? What are the steps we take to cross the road?. Help me cross the road safely. Help me to cross the road in the correct order Think Look Cross Stop Listen.

2k views • 5 slides

Road Safety Awareness Programs in India

#roadsafetyawarenessinindia It is very important to have a centralized system which can be reflected in the implementation of the rules and regulations of the country. Read more at http://www.ifros.org/blog/road-safety-awareness-in-india/

311 views • 2 slides

##Use Safety Signs And Road Signs In India For Safety Purpose

The purpose to follow street signs is to regulate the traffic. The person on the road must know all the road signs with names and along with the road signs chart. All these road signs in India are made for the benefit of the people so that there is no rush on the road.For more details about road signs, Safety signs and street signs visit:- https://www.shantbharat.com/traffic-fines-make-the-roads-safer/

183 views • 6 slides

Road Safety In India | safety Equipments | Road Safety Products

There are many safety equipment, which will useful for road safety. Following are the list of road safety equipments:- 1.tSpeed Breaker PVC Yellow And Black:- Description:- Highly resistance to severe impacts and harsh weather conditions. Colour Black and Yellow Dimension: 350*250*50 Material PVC 4 pieces in one meter (Two Yellow Two Black) Price:- 600 Rs.600 Rs.168 (GST@28%) Rs.135 (Shipping) You Save 5% 2.tTraffic Safety Cone Roto PVC Red And Black 750 Mm Highly Flexible And Durable. 4 inch reflective strip Color: Red/Black Height 750 mm Weight 1.6 KG approx Material PVC with Rubber base Price 160 Rs.160 Rs.28.8 (GST@18%) Rs.108 (Shipping) You Save 15% go for this http://bit.ly/2HvQOz0

299 views • 10 slides

Occupational Safety

Welcome to Safety Innovations Training Centre. We provide the best Fire Safety Training and Occupational Safety Instructor in Saudi Arabia. Get emergency management and rescue training with Safetyitc.com.sa.

48 views • 3 slides

Road Safety Measures In India | IRTE

Today Government is encouraging people to celebrate u2018road safety weeku2019 annually. This campaign was initiated by the ISS India HSE (Health Safety and Environment) to make people aware of the road safety measures in India. Website:- https://www.irte.com/ Add. : Aravali Hills, Surajkund Badhkal Road. Sector 43,Faridabad, Haryana - 121010. (NCR Delhi) India Call :- 0112681 6868, 01292477000 Mail Id:- [email protected] , [email protected]

61 views • 5 slides

285 views • 26 slides

225 views • 16 slides

• India Today
• Business Today
• Reader’s Digest
• Harper's Bazaar
• Brides Today
• Cosmopolitan
• Aaj Tak Campus
• India Today Hindi

IPS officer shares alarming video of unsupervised children riding bike

In the video shared by ips officer pankaj nain, the children are seen riding a bike without helmets, oblivious to the potential risks..

Listen to Story

• IPS officer Pankaj Nain shares alarming video of minors riding bike.
• Children seen riding without supervision or safety gear.
• Minors are prohibited from driving motor vehicles in public places.

IPS officer Pankaj Nain shared a video that has raised serious concerns about road safety. The clip shows two young boys recklessly riding a motorcycle without any supervision or safety gear, including helmets. The alarming video serves as a stark reminder of the dangers children face when left unsupervised and highlights the importance of parental vigilance.

In the video, the children are seen riding the bike with apparent ease, oblivious to the potential risks they are exposing themselves to. The lack of adult supervision raises questions about parental responsibility.

“What can be more dangerous than this! Parents pls take care of your loved ones. These lives are precious,” reads the caption.

What can be more dangerous than this !!! Parents , pls take care of your loved ones . These lives are precious 🙏 pic.twitter.com/ydL4hkNoKX — Pankaj Nain IPS (@ipspankajnain) April 22, 2024

According to traffic regulations, individuals under the age of 18 are prohibited from driving motor vehicles in public places. Even in cases where smaller engine motorcycles are permitted for those above 16, strict safety measures, including helmets, are mandated. However, the children in the video appear to be much younger than the legal driving age, making their actions even more dangerous.