handout 1 case study franklin kite company

Founders Online --> [ Back to normal view ]

The kite experiment, 19 october 1752, the kite experiment.

I. Printed in The Pennsylvania Gazette , October 19, 1752; also copy: The Royal Society. II. Printed in Joseph Priestley, The History and Present State of Electricity, with Original Experiments (London, 1767), pp. 179–81.

Franklin was the first scientist to propose that the identity of lightning and electricity could be proved experimentally, but he was not the first to suggest that identity, nor even the first to perform the experiment. 4 For many years pioneer electricians had noted the similarity between electrical discharges and lightning, and in 1746 John Freke in England and Johann Heinrich Winkler in Germany separately advanced the idea of identity and suggested theories to account for it. Franklin’s later adversary the Abbé Nollet wrote to the same effect in 1748. 5 Franklin and his Philadelphia collaborators, working independently, also observed the similarities, and in his letter of April 29, 1749, to John Mitchell on thundergusts he took as the basis for his entire discussion the hypothesis that clouds are electrically charged. 6 In the “minutes” he kept of his experiments he listed under the date of November 7, 1749, twelve particulars in which “electrical fluid agrees with lightning,” and noted further that “the electrical fluid is attracted by points,” but that it was not yet known whether this property was also in lightning. “But since they agree in all other particulars wherein we can already compare them, is it not probable they agree likewise in this? Let the experiment be made.” 7

However obvious the suggestion of such an experiment may now seem, no one had made it before. Herein lies Franklin’s principal claim to priority in this great discovery. A test of lightning required the prior discoveries embodied in the “doctrine of points,” of which he was the undisputed author, and the knowledge he had gained of the role of grounding in electrical experiments. It was the pointed metal rod, with its peculiar effectiveness in electrical discharge, which both led to the suggestion and facilitated the experiment.

In the following March Franklin, writing to Collinson, suggested that pointed rods, instead of the usual round balls of wood or metal, be placed on the tops of weathervanes and masts, and that they would draw the electrical fire “out of a cloud silently,” thereby preserving buildings and ships from being struck by lightning. 8 He repeated the suggestion in July 1750 in his “Opinions and Conjectures,” with the important addition that a wire be run down from the rod to the ground or water, and he then proposed the “sentry-box” experiment. This was the first public suggestion of an experiment to prove the identity of lightning and electricity. 9

According to Joseph Priestley, who almost certainly received his information directly from Franklin about fifteen years later, he did not perform the experiment himself at once because he believed a tower or spire would be needed to reach high enough to attract the electrical charge from a thunder cloud, and there was no structure in Philadelphia he deemed adequate for the purpose. Presumably he was waiting until Christ Church steeple, then in the early discussion stage, should be erected. 1 English scientists, who could have read Franklin’s proposal when it was published in Experiments and Observations in April 1751, apparently failed to recognize its significance. But about a year later, in the spring of 1752, when a translation had been published in Paris, the French reaction was very different. Delor, “master of experimental philosophy,” repeated most of Franklin’s experiments before the King, and then in May Dalibard, Franklin’s translator, and Delor each set up apparatus which performed successfully the “Philadelphia experiment” of drawing electricity from a thunder cloud. 2 Word of these achievements awoke the English electricians, and during the summer of 1752 the experiment was repeated several times in England as well as in France and Germany. 3

At some time during 1751 or 1752 Franklin got the idea that he could send his conductor high enough by means of a kite, and that if it were flown during a thunder shower, the wet string might serve to bring the electrical charge down within reach. When the idea first came to him and just when he carried it out cannot be established with absolute certainty. Priestley wrote that the famous experiment with kite and key took place during June 1752, and the present editors believe there is no good reason to doubt the correctness of this date. If so, then Franklin performed his experiment before he learned of what Dalibard and Delor had done in France.

Almost never during these years did Franklin report a particular electrical experiment until some time had elapsed and this affair seems to have been no exception. Word of Dalibard’s and Delor’s successes reached Philadelphia toward the end of August and the Pennsylvania Gazette of August 27 carried a short account reprinted from the May issue of the London Magazine . During September Franklin erected a lightning rod on his own house, ingeniously equipping it with bells that would ring when the wire became charged and thus notify him when the atmosphere above the house was electrified. 4 Then at last, on October 19, he printed in the Gazette a brief statement about the kite experiment with instructions for repeating it. The text of this statement, transmitted to Collinson, was read to the Royal Society on December 21. Neither in this paper nor at any later time did Franklin—or Priestley on his behalf—ever claim priority in carrying out the experiment he had been the first to propose. 5

The same October 19 issue of the Gazette also announced that Poor Richard for 1753 was then “In the Press, and speedily will be published”; in that almanac Franklin printed for the first time precise instructions for the erection of lightning rods for the protection of buildings. 6 The sequence of events in this somewhat complicated chain may be clarified by the following chronology:

Unfortunately, Franklin’s statement of the kite experiment has not been found in his own handwriting. Two text versions survive: that printed in the Pennsylvania Gazette of October 19, 1752, reprinted below; and a copy in the hand of Peter Collinson, now in the Royal Society. 7 Aside from unimportant variations in paragraphing, spelling, capitalization, and punctuation, the Collinson copy differs from the Gazette version in several respects: (1) It is headed “From Benn: Franklin Esqr To P Collinson” and is dated “Philadelphia Octo: 1: 1752.” (2) At the end, following the words “compleatly demonstrated,” Collinson skipped the equivalent of about three lines, then added in two lines: “See his Kite Experiment” and “to be printed with the rest.” These lines were later struck out. (3) In the intervening space and running on to the right of the two canceled lines appears the following insertion not in Collinson’s hand, but in one which is strikingly like that of William Watson: “I was pleased to hear of the Success of my experiments in France, and that they there begin to Erect points on their buildings. Wee had before placed them upon our Academy and Statehouse Spires.” (4) The paper is endorsed in the hand of a Royal Society clerk: “Letter of Benjamin Franklin Esq to Mr. Peter Collinson F.R.S. concerning an Electrical Kite. Read at R.S. 21 Decemb. 1752. Ph. Trans. XLVII . p. 565.”

These text differences present several puzzles. The heading and date (item 1) have led several writers 8 to believe that the text which follows is an extract of a letter from Franklin to Collinson of October 1, written more than two weeks before the statement was printed in the Gazette . In that case the Gazette text would be an extract from this earlier letter to Collinson. This is possible, but it leaves unexplained Franklin’s undated letter to Collinson, assigned below (p. 376) to the latter part of October, in which he wrote that he was sending, among other items, “my kite experiment in the Pennsylvania Gazette .” If what he had printed in the Gazette was indeed a passage from a letter already sent to Collinson, there would seem to have been no need to send him another copy of it. Conceivably, Collinson’s pen slipped when he wrote “Octo: 1,” as it occasionally did in referring to other Franklin letters, and he should have written “19,” “21,” or “31,” in which case he might have been copying the Gazette statement enclosed in Franklin’s later letter. Subsequent correspondence between the two men does not clarify the point.

The canceled addendum at the bottom (item 2) seems to have been intended as an instruction to a printer. Possibly Collinson first meant this paper for the printer of the 1753 Supplement of Experiments and Observations , and then decided to submit this copy to the Royal Society instead. But the question remains unexplained why he should have written “See his Kite Experiment,” when this document itself is the kite experiment, and is the only account of it we have in Franklin’s own words. The endorsement (item 4) presents no problem. The fact that the paper is lodged in the Royal Society makes it clear that this endorsement was added later for filing purposes after it had been printed in the Philosophical Transactions .

This leaves for consideration item 3, the short paragraph added to Collinson’s paper which mentions the French experiments and the erection of “points” in France and Philadelphia. The facts that it is written in a different hand from Collinson’s and that it is clearly an addition have not been considered by previous commentators. The paragraph has been taken as evidence that lightning rods were erected on the Academy building and the State House (Independence Hall) before October 1, 1752. The words are doubtless Franklin’s, though they have not been traced with certainty to any surviving document of his. If they were in fact part of a letter of October 1 to Collinson which also contained the original text of the statement on the kite experiment, then they must have been added to Collinson’s copy by someone else, probably Watson, who saw the original letter and thought this passage more important than Collinson had done. Or the paragraph may have been part of the later undated letter, probably of late October (the full text of which may not have been printed in the 1753 Supplement), with which Franklin enclosed the item on the kite experiment from the Gazette . Whatever the source, the paragraph must have been written by about November 1, 1752, in order for it to be read to the Royal Society as part of the report on the kite experiment on December 21 and printed as such in the Philosophical Transactions . 9 The probable date for the erection of the two Philadelphia lightning rods is not materially affected in any case. The problem of the source of this added paragraph is not resolved by any printed version of Franklin’s account. The Philosophical Transactions printed the text from Collinson’s copy. The Gentleman’s Magazine and London Magazine and the 1753 Supplement to Experiments and Observations also printed the report, but all three followed the dating and text of the Gazette version, not the Collinson copy. 1

It will be noticed that Franklin’s paper is not really an account of the kite experiment, but rather a brief statement that the experiment had taken place, followed by instructions as to how it could be successfully repeated. Franklin never, so far as is known, wrote out a narrative of his experience. The most detailed account that has survived is that which Joseph Priestley inserted in 1767 in his History of Electricity . There is every reason to believe that he learned the details directly from Franklin, who was in London at the time Priestley wrote the book. Franklin encouraged him to undertake the work and Priestley acknowledged in his preface the information Watson, Franklin, and Canton had supplied him. The account of the kite experiment, as Priestley wrote it about fifteen years after the event, may err in some details through faulty memory on Franklin’s part or misunderstanding on the Englishman’s, but it is probably correct in all major respects. In any case, since it is the nearest thing we have to a contemporary, first-hand account of one of the most famous episodes in Franklin’s career, it is reprinted here directly following Franklin’s statement.

I. Franklin’s Statement

Philadelphia, October 19

As frequent Mention is made in the News Papers from Europe, of the Success of the Philadelphia Experiment for drawing the Electric Fire from Clouds by Means of pointed Rods of Iron erected on high Buildings, &c. it may be agreeable to the Curious to be inform’d, that the same Experiment has succeeded in Philadelphia, tho’ made in a different and more easy Manner, which any one may try, as follows. 2

Make a small Cross of two light Strips of Cedar, the Arms so long as to reach to the four Corners of a large thin Silk Handkerchief when extended; tie the Corners of the Handkerchief to the Extremities of the Cross, so you have the Body of a Kite; which being properly accommodated with a Tail, Loop and String, will rise in the Air, like those made of Paper; but this being of Silk is fitter to bear the Wet and Wind of a Thunder Gust without tearing. To the Top of the upright Stick of the Cross is to be fixed a very sharp pointed Wire, rising a Foot or more above the Wood. To the End of the Twine, next the Hand, is to be tied a silk Ribbon, and where the Twine and the silk join, a Key may be fastened. This Kite is to be raised when a Thunder Gust appears to be coming on, and the Person who holds the String must stand within a Door, or Window, or under some Cover, so that the Silk Ribbon may not be wet; and Care must be taken that the Twine does not touch the Frame of the Door or Window. As soon as any of the Thunder Clouds come over the Kite, the pointed Wire will draw the Electric Fire from them, and the Kite, with all the Twine, will be electrified, and the loose Filaments of the Twine will stand out every Way, and be attracted by an approaching Finger. And when the Rain has wet the Kite and Twine, so that it can conduct the Electric Fire freely, you will find it stream out plentifully from the Key on the Approach of your Knuckle. At this Key the Phial may be charg’d; and from Electric Fire thus obtain’d, Spirits may be kindled, and all the other Electric Experiments be perform’d, which are usually done by the Help of a rubbed Glass Globe or Tube; and thereby the Sameness of the Electric Matter with that of Lightning compleatly demonstrated.

II. Priestley’s Account

To demonstrate, in the completest manner possible, the sameness of the electric fluid with the matter of lightning, Dr. Franklin, astonishing as it must have appeared, contrived actually to bring lightning from the heavens, by means of an electrical kite, which he raised when a storm of thunder was perceived to be coming on. This kite had a pointed wire fixed upon it, by which it drew the lightning from the clouds. This lightning descended by the hempen string, and was received by a key tied to the extremity of it; that part of the string which was held in the hand being of silk, that the electric virtue might stop when it came to the key. He found that the string would conduct electricity even when nearly dry, but that when it was wet, it would conduct it quite freely; so that it would stream out plentifully from the key, at the approach of a person’s finger. 3

At this key he charged phials, and from electric fire thus obtained, he kindled spirits, and performed all other electrical experiments which are usually exhibited by an excited globe or tube.

As every circumstance relating to so capital a discovery as this (the greatest, perhaps, that has been made in the whole compass of philosophy, since the time of Sir Isaac Newton) cannot but give pleasure to all my readers, I shall endeavour to gratify them with the communication of a few particulars which I have from the best authority.

The Doctor, after having published his method of verifying his hypothesis concerning the sameness of electricity with the matter of lightning, was waiting for the erection of a spire in Philadelphia to carry his views into execution; not imagining that a pointed rod, of a moderate height, could answer the purpose; when it occurred to him, that, by means of a common kite, he could have a readier and better access to the regions of thunder than by any spire whatever. Preparing, therefore, a large silk handkerchief, and two cross sticks, of a proper length, on which to extend it; he took the opportunity of the first approaching thunder storm to take a walk into a field, in which there was a shed convenient for his purpose. But dreading the ridicule which too commonly attends unsuccessful attempts in science, he communicated his intended experiment to no body but his son, who assisted him in raising the kite. 4

The kite being raised, a considerable time elapsed before there was any appearance of its being electrified. One very promising cloud had passed over it without any effect; when, at length, just as he was beginning to despair of his contrivance, he observed some loose threads of the hempen string to stand erect, and to avoid one another, just as if they had been suspended on a common conductor. Struck with this promising appearance, he immediately presented his knucle to the key, and (let the reader judge of the exquisite pleasure he must have felt at that moment) the discovery was complete. He perceived a very evident electric spark. Others succeeded, even before the string was wet, so as to put the matter past all dispute, and when the rain had wet the string, he collected electric fire very copiously. This happened in June 1752, a month after the electricians in France had verified the same theory, but before he heard of any thing they had done.

4 .  The best discussion of this entire topic is I. Bernard Cohen, “The Two Hundredth Anniversary of Benjamin Franklin’s Two Lightning Experiments and the Introduction of the Lightning Rod,” APS Proc , XCVI (1952), 331–66. The present editors are in full agreement with Cohen’s conclusions except, as this headnote will show, those derived specifically from consideration of the Collinson copy of BF ’s statement on the kite experiment.

5 .  Cohen, BF’s Experiments , pp. 104–9, discusses the matter with citations and quotations from various writers.

6 .  See above, III , 365–76.

7 .  Quoted by BF in his letter to John Lining, March 18, 1755 , Exper. and Obser. 1769, p. 323. The originals of BF ’s minutes have not survived.

8 .  See above, III , 472–3

9 .  See above, pp. 19–20.

1 .  See above, p. 116.

2 .  See above, pp. 302–10, 315–17.

3 .  See below, 390–2.

4 .  BF to Collinson, September 1753.

5 .  Writing in 1788 in his autobiography, BF mentions the Dalibard and Delor successes with the “Philadelphia experiments” and then adds simply and with disappointing brevity: “I will not swell this Narrative with an Account of that capital Experiment, nor of the infinite Pleasure I receiv’d in the Success of a similar one I made soon after with a Kite at Philadelphia, as both are to be found in the Histories of Electricity.” Par. Text edit., p. 386.

6 .  See below, p. 408.

7 .  The Collinson copy is reproduced in facsimile in APS Proc. , XCVI , pp. 334–5.

8 .  Notably Cohen in the works cited in the first two footnotes to this headnote, and Carl Van Doren in Franklin , p. 169, and Autobiographical Writings , p. 76.

9 .  The paragraph could be from some now missing letter of later date than about Nov. 1, 1752, only in the unlikely circumstance that it was added to the Collinson copy between the reading of the paper on December 21 and the transmission of this number of Phil. Trans. to the printer sometime in 1753.

1 .  Gent. Mag. , XXII (1752), 560–1; London Mag. , XXI (1752), 607–8; Supplemental Experiments and Observations on Electricity, Part II (London, 1753), pp. 106–8. Gent. Mag. and the 1753 Supplement both add the initials “B.F.” at the end; London Mag. omits the first paragraph and begins “Make a small cross, …” but otherwise follows the Gazette version.

2 .  In 1760 and later printed editions: “which is as follows:”

3 .  At this point Priestley inserted a footnote reference to Exper. and Obser ., p. 106, where BF ’s statement is printed.

4 .  At this time William Franklin was at least 21 years old (see above, III , 474), not the child shown in the well-known Currier and Ives print depicting the scene. There are a number of other errors in the picture.

Index Entries

You are looking at.

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Opinion Page - Franklin and the kite: what can we learn from this episode?

2020, HPS&ST Newsletter

Related Papers

SSRN Electronic Journal

Barbara Pfeffer Billauer

Viewpoint No. 83

International Journal of English Literature

Mary Louisa Cappelli, MFA, JD, PhD

The enclosure of the Atlantic Commons has included the most basic human needs of survival from land and water to seeds and genomes—all in the name of capital profit. In this essay, I explore how our contemporary leaders have lost the sagacity of our US Constitutional Founders who knew that civic duty and public virtue were necessary requisites to liberty and democracy. I argue that Founding Father Benjamin Franklin proposed a moral and ethical obligation to the protection of the commons, its resources, its knowledge, its culture, and its ideas. In all of Franklin’s ventures, we see models of self-sustainable reciprocity of capital and virtue, which enables all people to share in the wealth of its resources.

Science & Culture: Promise, Challenge and Demand, Proceedings of the 11th International IHPST Conference, Edited by: Fanny Seroglou, Vassilis Koulountzos and Anastasios Siatras,Thessaloniki, Greece, 1-5 July

Flora Paparou

Under the new light shed on the historical scientific instruments by the recent science education and history of science research, thousands of historical instruments are regarded as centers of new learning processes. Within this framework, we will analyze our five-year experience on the designing and realization of a science education programme at the historic 'School of Chios', which, established within the intellectual movement of the pre-Revolutionary period, hosts today a valuable 19 th and early 20 th century scientific instrument collection for educational use. Having as initial points the reasonable visitors' questions " What do these instruments do? " and " How important are they for the history of scientific culture? " we weaved, based on historical scientific documents, a web of stories and experiments around the exhibits and created series of educational scenarios. The air pump, electrostatic generators, vacuum tubes, magnetic compasses, the spectroscope and telescope, became centres of specifically prepared lecture-demonstrations, which, combining narration, audiovisual presentation and performance of experiments, proved able to captivate the interest of more than 4000 visitors – students, teachers and general public – during the period 2003-8. During 2007-8, in situ learning activities and learner-centered projects added an active learning perspective to the museum programme, when school students aged 12-14 and Second Chance School adult learners were invited to identify the instruments, conduct experiments and reconstruct simple equipment, within the framework of two European projects. In parallel, both the lecture-demonstrations and many of the in situ learner-centered projects were supported by the creation of educational material that permitted their use as distance-learning tools.

History of Science Society Newsletter, July issue

Marta Hanson

https://hssonline.org/resources/publications/newsletter/july-2020-newsletter/swapping-recipes-on-how-to-study-recipes-a-conversation/ Neeraja Sankaran, HSS Newsletter's Editor’s note: Scholarship via recipes of all sorts lies at the center of this article featuring a Q&A between the authors of two prize-winning pieces of writing. They are: Marta Hanson and Gianna Pomata, winners of the 2019 Derek Price/Rod Webster Prize for the best article in Isis for “Medicinal Formulas and Experiential Knowledge in the Seventeenth-Century Epistemic Exchange between China and Europe” in v.108, n1 (2017) of the journal; and Elaine Leong, winner of the 2019 Margaret W. Rossiter History of Women in Science Prize for her book Recipes and Everyday Knowledge: Medicine, Science, and the Household in Early Modern England (University of Chicago Press, 2018). It is a wonderful, meaty, conversation, and without further ado, I’ll let you get to it. For details about the article and book follow the links provided above.

Science Education

michael matthews

2014 International Conference on Lightning Protection (ICLP)

Chandima Gomes

Transactions of the American Philosophical Society

Marcus Levitt

Contains: Marcus C. Levitt, “Virtue Must Advertise: Dashkova's 'Mon histoire' and the Problem of Self-Representation,” The Princess and the Patriot: Ekaterina Dashkova, Benjamin Franklin, and the Age of Enlightenment, edited by Sue Ann Prince. (Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, Volume 96, Part 1.) Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 2006, pp. 39-56.

Rodolfo John Alaniz

"Learning by doing", P. Heering & R. Witje (Eds),

Constantine Skordoulis , Gianna Katsiampoura

"The scope of this paper is to describe how the Greek scholars of the late eighteenth and the early nineteenth centuries related to the political and intellectual developments in Europe during the Enlightenment through scientific instruments and experimental physics. We review the organization of Greek education during the Ottoman domination, focusing on the secondary schools and the scholars who introduced the experimental methodology in the late eighteenth century. In our analysis, the role of the scholar–teacher and his textbook are central to the adaptation and appropriation of the new scientific culture based on experiments and the experimental method. Furthermore, our analysis of the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century Greek physics textbooks focuses on what we term ‘iconic experiments’ (experiments performed by famous European scientists), since they constitute one of the main channels through which European experimental tradition was transferred to the Greek speaking regions. Throughout this paper, the teaching of the new science of ‘Newtonianism’ is associated with the ideas of the Enlightenment and the French Revolution, and is considered to have paved the way for the liberation of the Greek population from the Ottoman Empire."

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

• Rating Count
• Price (Ascending)
• Price (Descending)
• Most Recent

Ben franklin and his first kite

Resource type.

Ben Franklin and His First Kite Craftivity (Reading Street)

Reading Street's Ben Franklin and His First Kite Supplemental Materials

Ben Franklin and His First Kite , Centers and Printables

Ben Franklin and His First Kite

Ben Franklin and His First Kite 1st Grade Reading Street 2008 Unit 5 Story 6

Ben Franklin and His First Kite - Reading Street 5.6

Ben Franklin and His First Kite Spelling Games

Ben Franklin and His First Kite Resource Pack

Reading Street, BEN FRANKLIN AND HIS FIRST KITE , Teacher Pack by Ms. Lendahand

Ben Franklin and His First Kite , Interactive PowerPoint

Ben Franklin and His First Kite First Grade Reading Street Materials

Reading Street Grade 1 Ben Franklin and His First Kite - Day 2

Reading Street Grade 1 Ben Franklin and His First Kite - Day 1

Reading Street Grade 1 Ben Franklin and His First Kite - Day 3

Ben Franklin and His First Kite SmartBoard Companion 1st Grade

Reading Street Grade 1 Ben Franklin and His First Kite - Day 4

Ben Franklin and His First Kite Homework - Scott Foresman 1st Grade

Reading Street Grade 1 Ben Franklin and His First Kite - Day 5

Ben Franklin and His First Kite from the Scott Foresman Reading Series

Spelling and High Frequency Word Assessment - Ben Franklin and His First Kite

Ben Franklin and His First Kite Fry Phrases- Reading Street

High Frequency Word Assessment - Ben Franklin and His First Kite

Ben Franklin -Engineer a Kite STEM Challenge - GA 1st Grade SS1H1

Benjamin Franklin - Ben Franklin Mini-Unit

• We're hiring
• Help & FAQ
• Privacy policy
• Student privacy
• Terms of service
• Tell us what you think

IqEssay experts provide help with assignments of all academic levels and disciplines.

Ordering process

The order process starts with the form, where you need to specify the type of assignment, academic level, and deadline. Please fill out form as more detailed and accurate as you can.

If we need more details about the work you need, we will contact you shortly

At this step, you can check the correctness of your order information, apply discount code, check the final price and proceed to pay.

Once you pay the invoice, we send your order to the relevant and experienced writer to start the process of writing

When the deadline comes, you will receive the completed assignment in your mailbox and to the personal account as well.

Check and review the paper you get and if you have any question - let us know, we appreciate any feedback you give us

our services

• Custom Essay (any type)
• Business Plan
• Literature Review
• Research Paper
• Admission Essay
• Multiple Choice Questions
• Research Proposal
• Annotated Bibliography
• Presentation or Speech
• Article Review
• Creative Writing
• Reflective Writing
• Thesis / Dissertation
• Book / Movie Review
• Critical Thinking / Review
• Editing and proofreading

Thanks a lot! This is what I really needed. I completely forgot about my essay and remembered about it before the deadline. My author turned out to be a true professional with good punctuality.

His work deserves only the best words! At first, I was worried about the result, as I had never ordered an essay before, but the writer returned my essay a day before the deadline. I read it but did not find any mistakes or inaccuracies. The quality is just amazing, I'm happy.

I always thought that online writing services are scammers who paraphrase other people's papers from the Internet. My friend persuaded me to place an order here, and it exceeded all my expectations. My author is a true professional with good experience!

I am happy because he prepared an amazing term paper for me. I received praise from my professor. And most importantly, I was able to work and earn money for my family. This service has become real salvation!

I am a procrastinator and always regret it. But now I know that there is someone who will help me. Their papers are of high quality, free from plagiarism, and any errors. This is what can be called professionalism.

If they ask me if I am ready to recommend this author, I will answer without a doubt: Yes! This is the best experience of my life. We have become true friends. The writer is always in touch, offers new creative ideas in order to make the paper even better.

Main Information About The Service

Our service consists of a group of experts in the field of academic writing, editing, and proofreading. We have been working for more than 6 years, and the majority of clients become our loyal friends. We provide students with writing help of any type, no matter what problem they have. Our goal is to ease your complicated student's life, full of deadlines and requirements. We have experts in each academic discipline, and they seek to help you with the assignment.

Our writing company is a place where you are always welcome. IQEssay is not the other writing service, but a company with an innovative approach. Our goal is to make you stronger without getting lost or exhausted. We will help you comprehend the subject and get to a higher academic level. Our experts will help you come through the difficulties in academic writing. Order our online help and get a brilliant paper you can use as an example. Find the support and assistance you can always count on.

We offer fast and quality writing help with your writing assignments. Our writers are developing their writing experience every day. Thus, they can deal with any type of essay, research, or terms paper. Do not hesitate to contact us so that we can start working immediately.

We work on your success, knowledge, and positive reviews. Our experts are ready to handle your problems and give you some special advice. We want you to enjoy the cooperation, so we are ready to hear any feedback. Our team is working tirelessly to make the IQEssay more convenient to use.

We are not chasing money and popularity, as lots of companies do. Instead, we provide you with high-quality academic writing help and fast online support. When you work with us, you see how your knowledge and attitude to study is changing. Not only we help you with a particular homework but also make you more resilient and flexible. You will find the right way to succeed in studying.

We want every student to enjoy studying, rather than suffering from lots of assignments. Our mission is to let you set priorities so that you find education pleasant and fun. A lot of young people complain about the complexity of learning and the opportunities they wish they had to succeed. However, you do not have to suffer from the studying process because we turn it into pleasure.

If you cannot keep up with a large number of assignments, we will teach you to study faster and more productive. Our goal is to let you expand the boundaries and go beyond the limits of your abilities. That is how you succeed in not only studying but also each sphere of life. At IQEssay, you can feel free to ask for advice or share your fears about studying. We will help you find the fulcrum to implement your skills and talents.

We offer professional academic writing help with any type of homework. Whether you are a high school, college, or university student, you can rely on our help. Our experts are used to handling all types of essays, term papers, and article reviews. IQEssay group consists of writers and editors so that we complete the assignment from A to Z. Each writer has a Master's degree and at least five years of writing experience.

Do not ever doubt we can help you improve your grades and academic performance. We take responsibility for the services we provide. That is why you get quality assistance and fast online support. Discover the opportunity to enjoy studying with IQEssay.

When creating a company, we intended to gather like-minded people who seek to help students with their studying problems. The group of people who work for IQEssay is not just employees. They are writing experts and empathetic people who are ready to help.

Our team respects the values we created throughout the years of working. We do not want to burden you, so there are fundamental values:

• Continuous improvement and development. Our experts are working all hours to make the web site more convenient and secure. We encourage clients to give feedback about the quality of our services. Be analyzing their reviews, we decide what field of work needs improvement.
• Respect for customers. No matter what problems the writers have, they must not show disrespect. The client's wishes and needs are the requirements we have to follow. We teach our employees the way they should treat each client. It will make you satisfied with the service.
• Implementation of new technologies. We analyze your feedback and provide new technologies to make the web site more convenient. We want you to use our service easy and fast.
• Constant support. We know that is it easy to get lost when you have nobody to rely on. At IQEssay, we pay enough attention to each customer. Our support service works tirelessly to handle your doubts and questions. You are guaranteed to get fast online help whenever you need it.
• Synergy. Our team of like-minded people has the same motivation and goals. We are a big friendly team where people respect each other. We build reliable relations among employees, and it defines the cooperation with the client. Buy your writing assignment from the trusted service.

Search Kids Discover Online's Library of Content

• American History
• Earth Science
• Historical Figures
• Life Science
• Physical Science
• Space Science
• World History
• Infographics
• Lesson Plans

Franklin’s Kite Experiment

• from Ben Franklin

Lexile Levels

Franklin is probably most famous for his kite experiment. As the story goes, he and his son flew a silk kite on a long cord when the sky was full of black clouds. 

A metal rod was tied to the kite. An iron key was attached to the end of the cord. Franklin and his son tied a silk string to the end of the cord, where the key was, and held on to that.

As storm clouds approached, the metal rod drew electricity, which Franklin called “electric fire,” from them. When rain got the kite and the cord wet, that electricity was conducted from the rod to the key. That’s because water is a good conductor of electricity. Franklin touched the key with his knuckle and felt an electrical shock. This proved his theory that lightning was a form of electricity.

Login or Sign Up for a Free Account to view this content.

Next topic in ben franklin, the lightning rod and other practical inventions.

Ben Franklin

This is my alert message

He Snatched Lightning from the Sky and the Scepter from Tyrants: Benjamin Franklin, the Kite Experiment, and Purpose

In this lesson, stud

Walk-In-The-Shoes Questions As you read, imagine you are the protagonist.

• What challenges are you facing?
• What fears or concerns might you have?
• What may prevent you from acting in the way you ought?

Observation Questions

• Other than a Founding Father, a printer, and a businessman, what did Benjamin Franklin consider himself to be?
• Why did Franklin fly a kite in a thunderstorm?
• What responsibility did Franklin feel toward his community? How did this shape his purpose in his political and scientific life?

Discussion Questions Discuss the following questions with your students.

• What is the historical context of the narrative?
• What historical circumstances presented a challenge to the protagonist?
• How and why did the individual exhibit a moral and/or civic virtue in facing and overcoming the challenge?
• How did the exercise of the virtue benefit civil society?
• How might exercise of the virtue benefit the protagonist?
• What might the exercise of the virtue cost the protagonist?
• Would you react the same under similar circumstances? Why or why not?
• How can you act similarly in your own life? What obstacles must you overcome in order to do so?
• Students will analyze Benjamin Franklin’s drive to experiment and discover things about the world around him.
• Students will understand how they can pursue their purpose in their own lives.
• Students will apply this knowledge to discover, understand, and pursue their own purpose.

Student Handouts

He snatched lightning from the sky and the scepter from tyrants – handout a: narrative.

D. engaging and optimistic