• Get 7 Days Free

Tesla Inc TSLA

Company report, tesla: shares plunge on report of robotaxi unveiling delay.

Tesla shares fell over 6% at the time of writing on a Bloomberg report that Tesla plans to move the unveiling of its robotaxi to October from August. The report cites Tesla's desire to build additional prototypes as the reason for the delay. We see no reason to change our outlook based on the delayed investor event. Accordingly, we maintain our $200 fair value estimate for Tesla. Our narrow moat rating is also unchanged.

Price vs Fair Value

Bulls say, bears say.

Tesla has the potential to disrupt the automotive and power generation industries with its technology for EVs, AVs, batteries, and solar generation systems.
Traditional automakers and new entrants are investing heavily in EV development, which will result in Tesla seeing a deceleration in sales growth and being forced to cut prices due to increased competition, eroding profit margins.

New pro-Trump super PAC reportedly has Elon Musk's support after raising millions in Q2

From trump's djt social-media stock to crypto plays, here's what rose after assassination attempt on former president, 'damn, even ryan's endorsing trump': social media reacts as gamestop ceo cohen backs donald trump, tesla's stock gains, and it's not about ev sales or robotaxis, crypto stocks gain after trump assassination attempt fuels bitcoin rally, tesla up over 6%, on track for highest close since september 2023 — data talk, this single-stock etf with nvidia exposure is up over 400% this year. why investors should stay away., this investment fad looks good, but the math says you should probably avoid it, trading information, key statistics, company profile, competitors.

  • Volkswagen AG ADR VWAGY
  • Bayerische Motoren Werke AG BMW
  • Ford Motor Co F
  • General Motors Co GM

Financial Strength

92.543.605.50
12.510.350.62
9.300.180.33
61.371.232.62

Profitability

1.040.890.74
1.721.161.13
38.0629.4322.80

Auto Manufacturers Industry Comparables

9.74%2.83%4.56%
16.96%10.57%12.88%
13.43%4.62%6.26%

Sponsor Center

Tesla: Accounting And Valuation Concerns

Danil Sereda profile picture

  • In this article, I analyze recent reports from banks that have updated their price targets for Tesla stock since the release of Q3 results.
  • BofA and Morgan Stanley are overly optimistic, in my view, while JPMorgan seems closest to reality.
  • GLJ Research's analysts give you 5 reasons to believe TSLA is artificially boosting its revenue numbers.
  • Waiting and watching as the price is exposed to the consequences of multiple contractions - which are logical today - does not look optimal, in my view.

This time, I rate Tesla stock as Hold.

  • I do much more than just articles at Beyond the Wall Investing: Members get access to model portfolios, regular updates, a chat room, and more. Learn More »

Electronic Car Maker Telsa Reports Quarterly Earnings

Justin Sullivan

Introduction

In late June 2022, I posted a pair trade idea in which I recommended buying Tesla, Inc. ( NASDAQ: TSLA ) and selling Lucid Group, Inc. ( LCID ) stock short (in equal dollar amounts). My pitch was simple enough. Both companies look overvalued in terms of absolute multiples. Still, due to more efficient operational growth, Tesla should have experienced a much less noticeable multiple contraction than Lucid while receiving much more support from retail investors.

A few months have passed since then. The S&P 500 ( SPX ) fell even lower, dragging the rest of the market with it, including the companies mentioned above. But my thesis was justified - the difference in the magnitude of the declines in TSLA and LCID would bring a potential investor +22.9% (gross, before deducting brokerage commissions for shorting LCID):

Buy Tesla and Sell Lucid

Seeking Alpha, Ycharts, author's notes

At the time, I recommended holding this deal until the end of the year. However, in my article today, I want to look at the recent banks' equity research reports on Tesla's financial results. Let us take a look at them and try to assess how logical their forecasts and conclusions are and whether they should be trusted.

Bank of America - 3Q results look pretty good to us – first take [October 19]

Analysts John Murphy, CFA , John P. Babcock , and Federico Merendi reiterated a Neutral rating on Tesla with a price objective (PO) of $325 per share - that's 3.17% higher than their previous PO of $315.

Moreover, BofA said much the same thing as I did when I put forward my thesis in June - TSLA's self-funding status is a notable advantage over some startup competitors in the electric car space, but because its valuation is the result of optimistic projections for a long future (recall the 50% growth target), it will be quite difficult for the quotes to grow strongly in the near future.

However, why did the bank raise its TSLA price target anyway? The issue is how the actual results differed from what analysts had expected from the company:

BofA, TSLA report, October 19

BofA, TSLA report, October 19

I can understand why the analysts were wrong in forecasting gross profit - the variance seems negligible. But to be wrong on operating expenses (OPEX) by 15% and on taxes by 38.8%? If Tesla really is not just faking its books - we will get into that later - but is working as we see in the statements, then the company's operating efficiency makes one sit up and take notice because even top analysts could not imagine how Elon Musk could save so much on OPEX this quarter.

BofA values the company using EV/Sales and EV/EBITDA multiples, but $325/share is too optimistic a target in my opinion. Let us look at their logic. BofA analysts expect EV/EBITDA to be 41x in 2022, down 37.1% from 2021. At the same time, EBITDA growth will be 59.2% in 2022. This is such a sharp decline in the multiple against the backdrop of such a high growth rate in the underlying financial metric. In 2023, however, EBITDA is expected to grow by only 7% - many times less than in the previous year. However, the analysts' forecast includes a much less modest contraction of 6.6% in 2023, which is not in line with the trend of recent years:

BofA, TSLA report, with author's calculations and notes

BofA, TSLA report, with author's calculations and notes

In my view, the EV/EBITDA multiple in 2023 should be at least 30x, if not lower, if the multiple contraction continues - and it should, given lower growth forecasts and a generally higher interest rate environment - implying a 27% reduction in the multiple from 2022 to 2023. At EBITDA of $19.916 billion in 2023 (BofA's estimate), enterprise value should be about $600 billion - that's 5.5% below the current one.

Morgan Stanley - 3Q Margins Beat, But FY23 Outlook Still at Risk [October 19]

Analysts Adam Jonas, CFA , Evan Silverberg, CFA, CPA, et al. released an update of their Overweight rating, having $350 per share as a new price objective - below its pre-split target of $1300 (about $433 per share).

Morgan Stanley, like BofA, was wrong about growth in OPEX, interest expense, and stock-based compensation. The company's lower-than-expected CAPEX coupled with stronger EPS growth resulted in a 153.6% undervaluation of FCF:

MS, TSLA report, October 19

MS, TSLA report, October 19

The key takeaways from their analysis of TSLA's report:

  • expected cost inflation related to logistics/shipping as well as adverse timing differences related to supplier payments given significant input cost inflation on the battery and non-battery side. That didn't happen;
  • If one were to inflation adjust the YoY moves in CAPEX and OPEX, Tesla's clearly doing more with less;
  • Supercharging revenue will most likely get above 10% of Tesla's total revenue within the next 12 to 18 months;
  • Production is ramping up at the 40-GWh Megapack factory in California - a solid win for the company, demonstrating its strength and focus on the battery front.

Okay, but why did analysts lower their TSLA price target? Here you have to look at the input data for their SOTP 6-component model:

MS, TSLA report, October 19

Our PT of $433 is comprised of 6 components: (1) $203/share for core Tesla Auto business on 8.6mm units in 2030, 8.5% WACC, 15x 2030 exit EBITDA multiple, exit EBITDA margin of 20%. (2) Tesla Mobility at $25 on DCF with ~500k cars at $1.7/mile by 2030. (3) Tesla as a 3rd party supplier at $44/share. 4) Energy at $37/share, 5) Insurance at $12/share, & 6) Network Services at $113, 25mm MAUs, $100 ARPU by 2030, 20% discount. Source: Investing.com, author's adjustment for the split (3:1)
PtpdplrNxhx$278.5 Bil
FkrsbpnjXxdhy$77.0 Bil
SknvqspgyQjxnf$75.1 Bil
WbrrtctcsSnsxbwn$62.1 Bil
GbcztrcSfmj$61.3 Bil
LqbwytsxLltf$61.3 Bil
CmvjhgxlRdqjd$59.7 Bil
ZvgxymzfNhsc$56.5 Bil
MgnfkbsjCdyp$56.2 Bil

Core Tesla Auto business $203 $287
Tesla Mobility $25 $22 1.4%
3rd party supplier $44 $27 -38.2%
Energy $37 $31 -16.2%
Insurance $12 $8 -35.1%
Network Services $113 $75 -33.4%

Source: Author's compilation

If you add up all the parts of the analysts' outputs, it shows that their SOTP model does indeed show a price target of $453 per share - I suspect that the Morgan Stanley analysts mistyped their report and wrote $287 instead of $187 because the difference is exactly $100 while the WACC is higher and the sales volume is lower than before. Here's how the above table should most likely look like:

Core Tesla Auto business $203 $187 -7.7%
Tesla Mobility $25 $22 1.4%
3rd party supplier $45 $27 -38.2%
Energy $37 $31 -16.2%
Insurance $12 $8 -35.1%
Network Services $113 $75 -33.4%

If you look at how the analysts' assumptions have changed, we see only 3 concrete changes here: 1) the number of vehicles produced in 2030 is now reduced by 0.9 million units (-10.5%); 2) the WACC is increased by 0.2% (8.7% vs. 8.5%); and 3) the exit EBITDA margin is increased from 20% to 21%. This applies directly to the main revenue stream (Core Tesla Auto business) - the assumptions for the other parts are not disclosed (I assume the WACC has been applied to them as well, considering that Tesla Mobility's DCF has decreased by 12.5% without any visible adjustments in inputs).

That is, broadly speaking, the entire decline in the target price (the top rightmost column above) is due to A) a slight slowdown in operations, and B) a slight 0.2% increase in WACC. At the same time, a new, more positive improvement in business margins has by no means kept the target price for TSLA from correcting. In my opinion, the WACC was not raised high enough by analysts and should have been raised by more than 1% instead of 0.2%. Why do I think so?

First, the analysts had to account for higher betas, that mostly increased since their previous call (June 16, 2022):

Tesla Beta changes

Higher beta - higher WACC. Of course, it is possible that they took a 3-year coefficient, but then it would be cherry-picking. It is unlikely that the Morgan Stanley analysts did this (I really hope so).

The second is the rising risk-free rate, which mostly corresponds to 10-year Treasuries yield, which (theoretically) have no credit risk. The rate has risen since June 15, 2022, from 3.292% to 4.274% at the time of writing. Effective 7-10 year yields on corporate bonds have jumped even higher since then:

US Corporate 7-10 year effective yield

The third point that analysts may not have taken into account in their WACC calculation is the slowdown in economic growth in China and globally, which should have been reflected in the discount rate in the form of an additional premium. Since mid-June 2022, the geopolitical situation in the world has only gotten worse (in my opinion), and the forecast for global economic growth was just recently lowered by the IMF. Therefore, this premium should have been larger, if it was included in their calculations at all.

IMF world economic outlook growth

IMF, author's notes

If a minor 0.2% increase in WACC has led to such severe corrections in price targets for the company's various businesses, imagine how long the analysts' model should run - apparently they predict all segments to 2030, using huge growth rates in their models. Even a slight deviation from these rates will cause the model to collapse. In my opinion, this is a serious risk for those who want to rely on the DCF calculations of Morgan Stanley's analysts.

JPMorgan - Trim Estimates and Price Target After Softer Trend in 3Q Volume & Pricing [October 20]

Analysts Ryan Brinkman , Rajat Gupta, CFA , Manasvi Garg, et al. stick to an oppositional opinion concerning the other two banks above. They are Underweight Tesla with a price target of $150/share, revised down from $153/share, having the following reasoning:

We are lowering our estimates and price target after Tesla reported modestly softer than expected 3Q22 results Wednesday after the close, featuring lower-than-consensus margin on lower-than-expected revenue. Average transaction prices rose strongly y/y, but to a level that was lower than expected, driving a -3% revenue miss given that deliveries were previously disclosed. The results will likely add to debates about demand destruction that ensued after 3Q deliveries tracked -5% below company-compiled consensus. Management itself reined in near-term growth expectations, now looking for just less than its original target of more than +50% unit growth this year vs. previous indication only that the target would be more difficult to achieve. We continue to see risk to guidance for +50% annual unit volume growth over time (in some years more, in some years less), including given higher prices, higher interest rates, an increasingly tapped-out consumer, and given the paucity of new model introductions, with Tesla's lineup essentially the same as at the start of 2021 after the last Model S & X refresh, with the Cybertruck (originally slated for 2021) still on tap. Automotive gross margin of 26.8% missed Bloomberg consensus of 27.7%, with management citing persistent inflationary pressures, including higher logistics costs. We remain cautious on valuation, particularly in the context of lofty unit volume growth expectations, and continue to see material downside risk to our December 2023 price target, which declines today to $150 from $153, on account of unchanged target multiples applied to our slightly lower estimates, which decline primarily on flow-through of 3Q's softer-than-expected trend in demand expressed in the form of lower transaction prices. Source: JPMorgan's TSLA report, October 20

Their price target methodology is less sophisticated than Morgan Stanley's one (and more reasonable, in my opinion, than that of BofA) and is predicated upon a 50/50 blend of DCF and 2025E-based multiples analysis (itself a blend of P/E, EV/EBITDA, and price-to-sales).

And if you take a look at JPM's Key Figures table, theirs seem much more realistic - at least the analysts take into account a more reasonable multiple and margin contractions as Tesla expands its business and matures:

J.P.Morgan, TSLA report, October 20

JPMorgan, TSLA report, October 20

They propose to focus on equal weighting of 3 coefficients to find fair value (50% of the model) and DCF calculations for the remaining half. If they had focused solely on DCF, they would have received $129 per share on exit - and against a backdrop of rapidly growing FCF. However, FCF-based valuation has shown in practice how indifferent the market is to it concerning Tesla - just take a look at the stock rating history from Ryan Brinkman, the lead author of the above JPM report:

TipRanks, Ryan Brinkman, October 21

TipRanks, Ryan Brinkman, October 21

I am not saying Ryan is wrong this time either - "past performance is no guarantee of future performance" applies in reverse as well, let us not forget that. However, I am skeptical about FCF as a driver for determining Tesla's intrinsic value - it is much more correct to look at multiples and their compression over time. The current state of the company's valuation is more in line with JPMorgan than BofA or MS - given the increasing risks of Tesla losing its 50% growth rate in 2023 and 2024, I think we are in for a bumpy ride, and the only opportunity for buy-and-hold investors, if you consider yourself one, is to hedge.

GLJ Research - the numbers TSLA reports are LIKELY NOT REAL [October 20]

One risk that has long been talked about and is unlikely to be taken seriously by experts is the possibility of falsified reporting. More and more people keep doubting that Tesla can grow such volumes based on sub-ten percent OPEX and CAPEX growth (you may have noticed that this was one of Morgan Stanley's bullish arguments).

Gordon Johnson from GLJ Research - ranked by Bloomberg among the top stock pickers in the steel, iron ore, graphite electrode, electric vehicle, and solar spaces since initiating coverage in 2008 - writes, that with 2 of its 4 plants operating at just ~10% capacity, TSLA's gross margins expansion from 25.0% to 26.61% (per Bloomberg) is not possible.

In short, we believe the numbers TSLA reports are largely "fiction," resulting from aggressive accounting applied via the Shanghai plant, among other "tricks" used. And, given modeling numbers that are "fiction" is impossible, this time (i.e., for 3Q22), we aren’t going to even try (we see LARGE incentive for E. Musk to be as aggressive as possible, from an accounting perspective, given he has ~$15B-$20B worth of shares still left to sell to close the Twitter buyout... by our calculation). That is, using one example of TSLA's many accounting shenanigans, while pretty much every other automaker includes R&D in the gross profit they report, TSLA pushes this metric below the gross profit line, allowing it to claim industry leading margins; yet, when adjusting R&D out of COGS for TSLA, TSLA’s margins rank 11th among global automakers according to Bloomberg. Source: Gordon Johnson from GLJ Research

Bloomberg, GLJ Research

Bloomberg, GLJ Research

Mr. Johnson warns us - ​demand today is quite meager on all fronts, as evidenced by the company's own preliminary statistics and official government sources:

GLJ Research LLC

GLJ Research LLC

GLJ Research's analysts give 5 reasons to believe TSLA is artificially boosting its revenue numbers:

  • Revenues up 56% (YoY) amid expenses up only 2% (YoY);
  • CAPEX is flat (YoY) when construction of Berlin and Austin is done, which seems impossible. TSLA may be capitalizing more expenses than it should on the balance sheet, thus possibly overstating margins;
  • TSLA's SG&A is still running at $1B/qtr, roughly the same as two years ago, despite selling 2x as many cars;
  • Gross margins staying up with 2 new factories open, making just a fraction of their vehicle capacity;
  • Inventory is up 98% (YoY) while sales up 56%. Inventory should keep pace with sales, not outpace it - unless you capitalize raw materials for inventory which you can't move and don't impair so as not to take a profit hit.

GLJ Research LLC

All this looks strange, but it looks even stranger that no one can clearly refute these arguments that support TSLA's balance sheet fraud. If you can - I am really interested, please share your take in the comments.

Bottom Line

In this article, I took a closer look at the banks' recent analysis and reaction to Tesla's latest quarterly report. After reading and analyzing everything I had on hands, and also examining the banks' methods of calculating their price targets, I conclude that JPM has come closest to the truth with a reasonable estimate of the multiple and margin contractions over the next 5 years.

Yes, JPM's history of "sell" ratings looks depressing - but what if they are right this time? What if Tesla is actually fudging its books to inflate margins and boost net income above consensus?

The risks to the company are increasing, and while I do not think Tesla is going to repeat Enron's story, I understand those who think Tesla is an overvalued company. However, it is far from the only company in the market, nor is it the most overvalued. Given the support from retail investors, and assuming that the company's operational growth continues (if it is a reality), I believe that long-term investors need to hedge against growing risks anyway. Methods can vary - selling puts, pair trading ideas like the one I wrote about earlier, tactical positioning, etc. Waiting and watching as the price is exposed to the consequences of multiple contractions - which are logical today - does not look optimal, in my view.

This article was written by

Danil Sereda profile picture

Analyst’s Disclosure: I/we have no stock, option or similar derivative position in any of the companies mentioned, and no plans to initiate any such positions within the next 72 hours. I wrote this article myself, and it expresses my own opinions. I am not receiving compensation for it (other than from Seeking Alpha). I have no business relationship with any company whose stock is mentioned in this article.

Seeking Alpha's Disclosure: Past performance is no guarantee of future results. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment is suitable for a particular investor. Any views or opinions expressed above may not reflect those of Seeking Alpha as a whole. Seeking Alpha is not a licensed securities dealer, broker or US investment adviser or investment bank. Our analysts are third party authors that include both professional investors and individual investors who may not be licensed or certified by any institute or regulatory body.

Recommended For You

About tsla stock.

SymbolLast Price% Chg

More on TSLA

Related stocks.

SymbolLast Price% Chg
TSLA--

Trending Analysis

Trending news.

equity research report tesla

  • Today's news
  • Reviews and deals
  • Climate change
  • 2024 election
  • Fall allergies
  • Health news
  • Mental health
  • Sexual health
  • Family health
  • So mini ways
  • Unapologetically
  • Buying guides

Entertainment

  • How to Watch
  • My Portfolio
  • Latest News
  • Stock Market
  • Biden Economy
  • Stocks: Most Actives
  • Stocks: Gainers
  • Stocks: Losers
  • Trending Tickers
  • World Indices
  • US Treasury Bonds
  • Top Mutual Funds
  • Highest Open Interest
  • Highest Implied Volatility
  • Stock Comparison
  • Advanced Charts
  • Currency Converter
  • Basic Materials
  • Communication Services
  • Consumer Cyclical
  • Consumer Defensive
  • Financial Services
  • Industrials
  • Real Estate
  • Mutual Funds
  • Credit Cards
  • Balance Transfer Cards
  • Cash-back Cards
  • Rewards Cards
  • Travel Cards
  • Credit Card Offers
  • Best Free Checking
  • Student Loans
  • Personal Loans
  • Car Insurance
  • Mortgage Refinancing
  • Mortgage Calculator
  • Morning Brief
  • Market Domination
  • Market Domination Overtime
  • Asking for a Trend
  • Opening Bid
  • Stocks in Translation
  • Lead This Way
  • Good Buy or Goodbye?
  • Financial Freestyle
  • Fantasy football
  • Pro Pick 'Em
  • College Pick 'Em
  • Fantasy baseball
  • Fantasy hockey
  • Fantasy basketball
  • Download the app
  • Daily fantasy
  • Scores and schedules
  • GameChannel
  • World Baseball Classic
  • Premier League
  • CONCACAF League
  • Champions League
  • Motorsports
  • Horse racing
  • Newsletters

New on Yahoo

  • Privacy Dashboard

Yahoo Finance

Tesla robotaxi won't be ready for scale until 2030: analyst.

Tesla ( TSLA ) shares are trading higher on Friday despite a Bloomberg report indicating a two-month delay in unveiling the company's highly anticipated robotaxi. Guggenheim Securities director of automotive equity research Ron Jewsikow joins Catalysts to discuss Tesla's future prospects.

Jewsikow calls the robotaxi plans as "a massive pivot" for Tesla , marking a shift from the company's previous focus on making electric vehicles more affordable. He notes that the robotaxi event announcement came on the heels of Tesla's decision to delay or cancel its "next-generation platform," mounting more pressure on the robotaxi project to be a success.

A full-scale launch "prior to 2030 is unlikely," Jewsikow says about a realistic timeline for the robotaxi release date. Jewsikow views the period leading up to 2030 as a testing phase: "post-2030 is when this is a meaningful contributor to the business, and I would say even probably well into the 2030s before this is even at scale."

For more expert insight and the latest market action, click here to watch this full episode of Catalysts.

This post was written by Angel Smith

Video Transcript

Let's get to some trendy tickets that we're watching here, Tesla snapping its winning streak.

Shares are actually moving to the upside this morning.

It's up over 2.5%.

But this comes after Bloomberg did report that the company is delaying the unveiling of its Robo Taxi by two months.

Now, this comes as the stock is coming off an 11 day rally that was sparked by better than expected delivery numbers for the second quarter that jump initially wiping out the stock losses for the year, then moving back into negative territory for 2024 after yesterday's losses and now we are seeing the stock back to the upside this morning.

So for now we are going to bring in Jessica Guggenheim securities director.

This is Ron.

Sorry about that, Ron, my read there, Director of automotive equity Research for More.

Ron, thanks so much for joining us here.

So it's interesting to me this reaction given what we know about the Robo taxis here is this the latest indication of the facts and fundamentals of Tesla not necessarily being the key driver of the stock.

Y Yeah, I think that's probably fair.

I would I would point out today specifically that the entire ev space is, is moving to the upside quite a bit.

I think there's, there's probably some either short covering or, or some squeeze dynamics going on today.

But um yeah, related to the Robo Taxi event specifically, I think the the issues yesterday and why it was such a pronounced decline for the stock was, I think it's important to think about the genesis of the Robo Taxi event.

It was, it was during Tesla's uh significant downward move in the first quarter of this year when there was a report that they were delaying or canceling the next generation platform.

And that same day was when the Robo Taxi event was announced.

I think by some investors, it has been viewed as as a bit of a defensive or a a massive pivot at least for the company away from affordable EV models in the future to Robotaxis.

And to the extent that they, they lack some credibility there, which I think a delay at least leads people to believe that is that is an issue for the stock.

It was also just very overextended.

I think coming off the rally post deliveries and the energy deployments.

Ron, how confident are you that we actually are going to see Robotaxis from Tesla one day uh one day is, is a very long time line.

So I would say I would say I'm more competent than not in one day.

I would say prior to 2030 at any scale, I, I think it's very unlikely I would expect testing to be done before 2030 to the extent they're serious about this as a project, which they certainly seem to be now.

Um So I would say post 2030 is when this is a meaningful contributor to the business.

And I would, I would say even probably well into the 20 thirties before this is, this is really at scale.

  • Up next Advertisement

We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience. This includes personalizing content and advertising. To learn more, click here . By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, revised Privacy Policy and Terms of Service .

Zacks Investment Research Home

Member Sign In

Don't Know Your Password?

Zacks

  • Zacks #1 Rank
  • Zacks Industry Rank
  • Zacks Sector Rank
  • Equity Research
  • Mutual Funds
  • Mutual Fund Screener
  • ETF Screener
  • Earnings Calendar
  • Earnings Releases
  • Earnings ESP
  • Earnings ESP Filter
  • Stock Screener
  • Premium Screens
  • Basic Screens
  • Thematic Screens
  • Research Wizard
  • Personal Finance
  • Money Management
  • Retirement Planning
  • Tax Information
  • My Portfolio
  • Create Portfolio
  • Style Scores
  • Testimonials
  • Zacks.com Tutorial

Services Overview

  • Zacks Ultimate
  • Zacks Investor Collection
  • Zacks Premium

Investor Services

  • ETF Investor
  • Home Run Investor
  • Income Investor
  • Stocks Under $10
  • Value Investor
  • Top 10 Stocks

Other Services

  • Method for Trading
  • Zacks Confidential

Trading Services

  • Black Box Trader
  • Counterstrike
  • Headline Trader
  • Insider Trader
  • Large-Cap Trader
  • Options Trader
  • Short Sell List
  • Surprise Trader
  • Alternative Energy

Zacks Investment Research Home

You are being directed to ZacksTrade, a division of LBMZ Securities and licensed broker-dealer. ZacksTrade and Zacks.com are separate companies. The web link between the two companies is not a solicitation or offer to invest in a particular security or type of security. ZacksTrade does not endorse or adopt any particular investment strategy, any analyst opinion/rating/report or any approach to evaluating individual securities.

If you wish to go to ZacksTrade, click OK . If you do not, click Cancel.

Tesla (TSLA)

(delayed data from nsdq).

$252.64 USD

+4.41 (1.78%)

Updated Jul 15, 2024 04:00 PM ET

After-Market: $254.54 +1.90 (0.75%) 7:58 PM ET

Add to portfolio

This is our short term rating system that serves as a timeliness indicator for stocks over the next 1 to 3 months. How good is it? See rankings and related performance below.

Zacks Rank Definition Annualized Return
1Strong Buy24.15%
2Buy17.88%
3Hold9.47%
4Sell5.14%
5Strong Sell2.57%
S&P50011.11%

Zacks Rank Education - Learn about the Zacks Rank

Zacks Rank Home - Zacks Rank resources in one place

Zacks Premium - The only way to fully access the Zacks Rank

3-Hold of 5     3    

The Style Scores are a complementary set of indicators to use alongside the Zacks Rank. It allows the user to better focus on the stocks that are the best fit for his or her personal trading style.

The scores are based on the trading styles of Value, Growth, and Momentum. There's also a VGM Score ('V' for Value, 'G' for Growth and 'M' for Momentum), which combines the weighted average of the individual style scores into one score.

Value Score A
Growth Score A
Momentum Score A
VGM Score A

Within each Score, stocks are graded into five groups: A, B, C, D and F. As you might remember from your school days, an A, is better than a B; a B is better than a C; a C is better than a D; and a D is better than an F.

As an investor, you want to buy stocks with the highest probability of success. That means you want to buy stocks with a Zacks Rank #1 or #2, Strong Buy or Buy, which also has a Score of an A or a B in your personal trading style.

Zacks Style Scores Education - Learn more about the Zacks Style Scores

F  Value | F  Growth | D  Momentum | F  VGM

The Zacks Industry Rank assigns a rating to each of the 265 X (Expanded) Industries based on their average Zacks Rank.

An industry with a larger percentage of Zacks Rank #1's and #2's will have a better average Zacks Rank than one with a larger percentage of Zacks Rank #4's and #5's.

The industry with the best average Zacks Rank would be considered the top industry (1 out of 265), which would place it in the top 1% of Zacks Ranked Industries. The industry with the worst average Zacks Rank (265 out of 265) would place in the bottom 1%.

Zacks Rank Education -- Learn more about the Zacks Rank Zacks Industry Rank Education -- Learn more about the Zacks Industry Rank

Bottom 30% (174 out of 250)

Industry: Automotive - Domestic

Zacks Premium Feature

Balance Sheet

The Zacks Equity Research reports , or ZER for short, are our in-house, independently produced research reports.

The ever popular one-page Snapshot reports are generated for virtually every single Zacks Ranked stock. It's packed with all of the company's key stats and salient decision making information. Including the Zacks Rank, Zacks Industry Rank, Style Scores, the Price, Consensus & Surprise chart, graphical estimate analysis and how a stocks stacks up to its peers.

The detailed multi-page Analyst report does an even deeper dive on the company's vital statistics. In addition to all of the proprietary analysis in the Snapshot, the report also visually displays the four components of the Zacks Rank (Agreement, Magnitude, Upside and Surprise); provides a comprehensive overview of the company business drivers, complete with earnings and sales charts; a recap of their last earnings report; and a bulleted list of reasons to buy or sell the stock. It also includes an industry comparison table to see how your stock compares to its expanded industry, and the S&P 500.

Researching stocks has never been so easy or insightful as with the ZER Analyst and Snapshot reports.

Learn more about Zacks Equity Research reports

See more Zacks Equity Research reports

   

  • Annual Balance Sheet
  • Quarterly Balance Sheet

Fiscal Year End for Tesla, Inc falls in the month of December.

All items in Millions except Per Share data.

12/31/2023 12/31/2022 12/31/2021 12/31/2020 12/31/2019
Assets          
Receivables 3,508 2,952 1,913 1,886 1,324
Notes Receivable 0 0 0 0 0
Inventories 13,626 12,839 5,757 4,101 3,552
Other Current Assets 3,388 2,941 1,723 1,346 713
Total Current Assets 49,616 40,917 27,100 26,717 12,103
Net Property & Equipment 35,714 28,583 23,395 15,838 12,843
Investments & Advances 0 0 0 0 0
Other Non-Current Assets 0 0 0 0 393
Deferred Charges 6,733 0 0 0 0
Intangibles 431 409 457 520 537
Deposits & Other Assets 9,944 9,866 9,163 7,515 7,215
Liabilities & Shareholders Equity 12/31/2023 12/31/2022 12/31/2021 12/31/2020 12/31/2019
Notes Payable 0 0 0 0 0
Accounts Payable 14,431 15,255 10,025 6,051 3,771
Current Portion Long-Term Debt 0 0 0 0 1,785
Current Portion Capital Leases 2,373 1,502 1,589 2,132 0
Accrued Expenses 9,080 7,142 5,719 3,855 2,905
Income Taxes Payable 0 0 0 0 0
Other Current Liabilities 2,864 2,810 2,372 2,210 2,206
Total Current Liabilities 28,748 26,709 19,705 14,248 10,667
Mortgages 0 0 0 0 0
Deferred Taxes/Income 3,251 2,804 2,052 1,284 1,207
Convertible Debt 0 0 0 51 0
Long-Term Debt 0 0 0 0 11,634
Non-Current Capital Leases 2,857 1,597 5,245 9,556 0
Other Non-Current Liabilities 8,153 5,330 3,546 3,330 2,691
Minority Interest (Liabilities) 242 409 568 604 643
Shareholders Equity 12/31/2023 12/31/2022 12/31/2021 12/31/2020 12/31/2019
Preferred Stock 0 0 0 0 0
Common Stock (Par) 3 3 1 1 0
Capital Surplus 34,892 32,177 29,803 27,260 12,737
Retained Earnings 27,882 12,885 331 -5,399 -6,083
Other Equity 590 424 880 1,213 813
Treasury Stock 0 0 0 0 0
Total Shareholder's Equity 63,367 45,489 31,015 23,075 7,467
Total Liabilities & Shareholder's Equity 106,618 82,338 62,131 52,148 34,309
Total Common Equity 63,367 45,489 31,015 23,075 7,467
Shares Outstanding 3,184.70 3,164.10 3,012.80 2,843.70 2,703.60
6/30/2024 3/31/2024 12/31/2023 9/30/2023 6/30/2023
Assets          
Receivables NA 3,887 3,508 2,520 3,447
Notes Receivable NA 0 0 0 0
Inventories NA 16,033 13,626 13,721 14,356
Other Current Assets NA 3,752 3,388 2,708 2,997
Total Current Assets NA 50,535 49,616 45,026 43,875
Net Property & Equipment NA 37,172 35,714 33,863 32,324
Investments & Advances NA 0 0 0 0
Other Non-Current Assets NA 0 0 0 0
Deferred Charges NA 6,769 6,733 0 0
Intangibles NA 421 431 441 465
Deposits & Other Assets NA 9,962 9,944 10,974 10,575
NA
Liabilities & Shareholders Equity 6/30/2024 3/31/2024 12/31/2023 9/30/2023 6/30/2023
Notes Payable NA 0 0 0 0
Accounts Payable NA 14,725 14,431 13,937 15,273
Current Portion Long-Term Debt NA 0 0 0 0
Current Portion Capital Leases NA 2,461 2,373 1,967 1,459
Accrued Expenses NA 9,243 9,080 7,636 7,658
Income Taxes Payable NA 0 0 0 0
Other Current Liabilities NA 3,024 2,864 3,100 3,202
Total Current Liabilities NA 29,453 28,748 26,640 27,592
Mortgages NA 0 0 0 0
Deferred Taxes/Income NA 3,214 3,251 3,059 3,021
Convertible Debt NA 0 0 0 0
Long-Term Debt NA 0 0 0 0
Non-Current Capital Leases NA 2,899 2,857 2,426 872
Other Non-Current Liabilities NA 8,153 7,321 6,924
Minority Interest (Liabilities) NA 73 242 277 288
NA
Shareholders Equity 6/30/2024 3/31/2024 12/31/2023 9/30/2023 6/30/2023
Preferred Stock NA 0 0 0 0
Common Stock (Par) NA 3 3 3 3
Capital Surplus NA 35,763 34,892 34,201 33,436
Retained Earnings NA 29,011 27,882 19,954 18,101
Other Equity NA 330 590 60 354
Treasury Stock NA 0 0 0 0
Total Shareholder's Equity NA 65,107 63,367 54,218 51,894
Total Liabilities & Shareholder's Equity NA 109,226 106,618 93,941 90,591
Total Common Equity 0 65,107 63,367 54,218 51,894
Shares Outstanding 3,189.20 3,189.20 3,184.70 3,178.90 3,173.90

This file is used for Yahoo remarketing pixel add

equity research report tesla

Due to inactivity, you will be signed out in approximately:

Tesla's quarterly deliveries fall less than expected; shares rally

  • Medium Text
  • Tesla's Q2 deliveries fall less than expected on price cuts and incentives
  • Analysts highlight better than expected sales in China and the US
  • Marks first time Tesla deliveries fall for a second consecutive quarter

Reuters Graphics

Sign up here.

Reporting by Hyunjoo Jin in San Francisco and Akash Sriram in Bengaluru; Additinoal reporting by Jaspreet Singh and Ben Klayman; Editing by Shounak Dasgupta, Anil D'Silva, Louise Heavens and Matthew Lewis

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles. New Tab , opens new tab

equity research report tesla

Thomson Reuters

Akash reports on technology companies in the United States, electric vehicle companies, and the space industry. His reporting usually appears in the Autos & Transportation and Technology sections. He has a postgraduate degree in Conflict, Development, and Security from the University of Leeds. Akash's interests include music, football (soccer), and Formula 1.

Union workers at endangered tractor factory weigh Biden v. Trump

Business Chevron

Japanese yen media event in Tokyo

Japan keeps up yen warnings; 6 trillion yen, 2-day intervention suspected

Japan stands ready to take all possible measures to counter excessively volatile currency moves, Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi said on Tuesday, keeping markets on alert over the chance of renewed intervention to prop up the yen.

A man walks past the London Stock Exchange in the City of London

IMAGES

  1. Tesla Inc. (TSLA) Equity Research Report

    equity research report tesla

  2. Tesla

    equity research report tesla

  3. Tesla 3QDeliveries Underweightstock.pdf

    equity research report tesla

  4. Tesla (TSLA) Equity Research Update

    equity research report tesla

  5. Tesla (TSLA) Equity Research Update

    equity research report tesla

  6. Tesla Debt Leverage And Capital Structure Analysis

    equity research report tesla

COMMENTS

  1. Tesla Inc. Research & Ratings

    Tesla Inc. research and ratings by Barron's. View TSLA revenue estimates and earnings estimates, as well as in-depth analyst breakdowns.

  2. Tesla, Inc. Common Stock (TSLA) Analyst Research

    Find the latest analyst research, reports, and ratings for Tesla, Inc. Common Stock (TSLA) at Nasdaq.com.

  3. TSLA: Tesla

    TSLA: Tesla - Full Company Report. Get the latest Full Company Report for Tesla from Zacks Investment Research

  4. TSLA

    Tesla Inc. analyst ratings, historical stock prices, earnings estimates & actuals. TSLA updated stock price target summary.

  5. TSLA: Tesla

    TSLA: Tesla equity research. Get the latest equity research information from Zacks Investment Research.

  6. PDF Tesla, Inc

    TESLA, INC. FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2021 INDEX Page PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited) 4 Consolidated Balance Sheets 4 Consolidated Statements of Operations 5 Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income 6 Consolidated Statements of Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests and Equity 7

  7. PDF Tesla, Inc

    Tesla, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) ... Consolidated Statements of Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests and Equity 7 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 8 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 9 ... Research and development 865 666 Selling, general and administrative 992 1,056 ...

  8. PDF Tesla Inc TSLA (XNAS)

    Tesla Inc TSLA (XNAS)Qualitative Equi. y Research Overview At the heart of our valuation system is a detailed projection of a company's future cash flows, resulting from o. r analysts' research. Analysts create custom industry and company assumptions to feed income statement, balance sheet, and capital investment assumptions into our globally ...

  9. Tesla Equity Research Report: Short

    Tesla Equity Research Report: Short - Opportunity For An Asymmetric Return Of Over 50% Jun. 10, 2021 3:06 PM ET Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) Yew Jing Zheng's Blog

  10. Tesla (TSLA) Stock Price Quote, Value & News

    See the latest Tesla Inc stock price (NASDAQ:TSLA), related news, valuation, dividends and more to help you make your investing decisions.

  11. Top Analyst Reports for Tesla, JPMorgan & Oracle

    The Zacks Research Daily presents the best research output of our analyst team. Today's Research Daily features new research reports on 16 major stocks, including Tesla, Inc. (TSLA), JPMorgan ...

  12. Tesla (TSLA) Return On Equity (TTM)

    Return on Equity (or ROE) is calculated as income divided by average shareholder equity (past 12 months, including reinvested earnings). The income number is listed on a company's Income Statement ...

  13. Tesla: Accounting And Valuation Concerns

    At the time, I recommended holding this deal until the end of the year. However, in my article today, I want to look at the recent banks' equity research reports on Tesla's financial results.

  14. Tesla Investor Relations

    Tesla's mission is to accelerate the world's transition to sustainable energy. Today, Tesla builds not only all-electric vehicles but also infinitely scalable clean energy generation and storage products.

  15. U.S. Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Report

    Today, we are publishing our first ever U.S. Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Report which outlines the current state of our DEI position and actions we are taking to engage with employees, candidates and community members, as we encourage talented people from all backgrounds to join us on our mission to accelerate the world's transition to sustainable energy. We look forward to sharing ...

  16. 10-K

    These Destination Charging and workplace locations deploy Tesla Wall Connectors to provide charging to Tesla vehicle owners who patronize or are employed at their businesses. We also work with single-family homeowners and multi-family residential entities to deploy home charging solutions.

  17. TSLA

    Tesla Inc. balance sheet, income statement, cash flow, earnings & estimates, ratio and margins. View TSLA financial statements in full.

  18. Tesla downgraded to sell as UBS says the stock overvalues growth

    Tesla's rating was downgraded to sell at UBS, after the broker said the stock assigns too big a premium to the automaker's growth initiatives.

  19. PDF Tesla, Inc

    ☒ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF ... Consolidated Statements of Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests and Equity 7 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 9 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 10 ... Research and development 576 279 1,242 603 Selling, general and administrative 973 661 ...

  20. Top Research Reports for Berkshire Hathaway, Tesla & JPMorgan Chase

    Today's Research Daily features new research reports on 16 major stocks, including Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (BRK.B), Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM).

  21. PDF tsla-10ka_20211231.htm

    In addition, the Board has established a management committee under the Tesla, Inc. 2019 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Equity Award Committee") to grant and administer equity awards, subject to certain maximum limits on the seniority of personnel to whom the Equity Award Committee may grant awards and the value of any individual award.

  22. Tesla stock's hot month: Here's a reality check

    Tesla Inc. shares in the past 30 days have climbed at a frenetic pace, but it's becoming harder to argue the case for the bulls. The last time there was a run like this, the rally was supported ...

  23. Tesla robotaxi won't be ready for scale until 2030: Analyst

    Tesla (TSLA) shares are trading higher on Friday despite a Bloomberg report indicating a two-month delay in unveiling the company's highly anticipated robotaxi. Guggenheim Securities director of ...

  24. TSLA: Tesla

    TSLA: Tesla balance sheet. Get the latest balance sheet from Zacks Investment Research.

  25. Tesla's quarterly deliveries fall less than expected; shares rally

    Tesla on Tuesday reported a smaller-than-expected 5% drop in vehicle deliveries in the second quarter, as the electric carmaker's price cuts and incentives helped mitigate cooling demand.

  26. PDF Tesla, Inc

    ☒ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF ... Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds 58 Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities 58 ... Research and development 667 576 1,532 1,242 Selling, general and administrative 961 973 1,953 2,029 ...

  27. PDF Tesla, Inc

    TESLA, INC. FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2021 INDEX Page PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited) 4 Consolidated Balance Sheets 4 Consolidated Statements of Operations 5 Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) 6 Consolidated Statements of Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests and Equity 7