homeworks energy class action lawsuit

• Find a Lawyer
• Ask a Lawyer
• Research the Law
• Law Schools
• Laws & Regs
• Newsletters
• Justia Connect
• Pro Membership
• Basic Membership
• Justia Lawyer Directory
• Platinum Placements
• Gold Placements
• Justia Elevate
• Justia Amplify
• PPC Management
• Google Business Profile
• Social Media
• Justia Onward Blog

This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER .

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

• Search for Party Aliases
• Associated Cases
• Case File Location
• Case Summary
• Docket Report
• History/Documents
• Related Transactions
• Check Status

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?

Subscribe to Justia's Free Newsletters featuring summaries of federal and state court opinions .

• Bankruptcy Lawyers
• Business Lawyers
• Criminal Lawyers
• Employment Lawyers
• Estate Planning Lawyers
• Family Lawyers
• Personal Injury Lawyers
• Estate Planning
• Personal Injury
• Business Formation
• Business Operations
• Intellectual Property
• International Trade
• Real Estate
• Financial Aid
• Course Outlines
• Law Journals
• US Constitution
• Regulations
• Supreme Court
• Circuit Courts
• District Courts
• Dockets & Filings
• State Constitutions
• State Codes
• State Case Law
• Legal Blogs
• Business Forms
• Product Recalls
• Justia Connect Membership
• Justia Premium Placements
• Justia Elevate (SEO, Websites)
• Justia Amplify (PPC, GBP)
• Testimonials

The Law and Lawyers Blog

LawDim is a legal media and services platform that provides enlightenment and access to legal services to members of the public (individuals and businesses) while also availing lawyers of needed information on new trends and resources in various areas of practice.

HomeWorks Energy Lawsuit: What You Need to Know

HomeWorks Energy, Inc. is a Massachusetts-based home energy assessment and upgrade company. In February 2021, a class-action lawsuit was filed against HomeWorks Energy alleging wage violations, including illegal overtime pay and deductions from employee paychecks for minor infractions.

The lawsuit alleges that HomeWorks Energy violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) by deducting money from employee paychecks for minor infractions, such as receiving customer complaints or leaving a tool at the job site. The lawsuit also alleges that HomeWorks Energy failed to include all of an employee’s income when calculating overtime pay, which resulted in unpaid overtime wages.

The lawsuit is still ongoing, and HomeWorks Energy has denied the allegations. However, if the lawsuit is successful, it could result in significant back pay and liquidated damages for HomeWorks Energy employees.

Q: Who is eligible to participate in the HomeWorks Energy lawsuit?

A: All HomeWorks Energy employees who were paid on an hourly basis and who were subject to wage deductions or unpaid overtime wages are eligible to participate in the lawsuit.

Q: What damages are available in the HomeWorks Energy lawsuit?

A: If the lawsuit is successful, HomeWorks Energy employees may be eligible to recover back pay, liquidated damages, and attorneys’ fees.

Q: How do I join the HomeWorks Energy lawsuit?

A: If you are a HomeWorks Energy employee and you believe that you have been the victim of wage violations, you should contact the law firm representing the plaintiffs in the lawsuit.

Q: What is the status of the HomeWorks Energy lawsuit?

A: The lawsuit is still ongoing.

Q: What is the likelihood that the HomeWorks Energy lawsuit will be successful?

A: It is impossible to say with certainty whether the lawsuit will be successful. However, the law firm representing the plaintiffs has a strong track record of success in wage and hour cases.

Q: What should I do if I am a HomeWorks Energy employee and I believe that I have been the victim of wage violations?

Conclusion:.

The HomeWorks Energy lawsuit is a significant case for HomeWorks Energy employees and for the wage and hour law community as a whole. If the lawsuit is successful, it could result in significant back pay and liquidated damages for HomeWorks Energy employees. It could also send a strong message to other employers that wage violations will not be tolerated.

References:

• HomeWorks Energy Inc. Class Action – Hayber, McKenna & Dinsmore: https://www.hayberlawfirm.com/employee-rights/pending-class-actions/homeworks-energy-inc-class-action/
• HomeWorks Energy | Complaints | Better Business Bureau® Profile: https://www.bbb.org/us/ma/medford/profile/home-performance-contractor/homeworks-energy-0021-132630/complaints

Leave a comment Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

• Take Action All Categories
• Lawsuits by Brand
• Search Lawsuits to Join
• Lawsuits to Join
• Pending Class Action Settlements
• Open Class Action Settlements
• Legal News All Categories
• Consumer News
• Industry & Trade
• Labor & Employment
• Medical Devices
• Pharmaceuticals
• Product Recalls
• Class Action Settlement Checks Mailed
• Closed Class Actions
• Data Breach
• Explained All Categories
• Consumer Guides
• Get Free Rebates
• I Am a Lawyer
• About Us All Categories
• Our Mission
• Vivid Vision
• Newsletter Signup
• Canada News

Talen Energy pension $20M class action settlement

• Status: In progress
• Deadline to file a claim: 07/01/2024
• Proof of Purchase Required: No
• Potential Individual Reward: $4,000
• Total Settlement Amount: $20 million

The settlement benefits individuals who were participants in the Talen Energy Retirement Plan between June 1, 2015, and Dec. 5, 2019.

Top Class Actions  |  April 15, 2024

Category: labor & employment.

Talen Energy Corp. agreed to a $20 million settlement to resolve claims it violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act ( ERISA ) by reducing pension benefits.

According to the class action lawsuit, Talen Energy Corp. unlawfully reduced pension benefits for terminated employees. These and other policies allegedly violated ERISA.

Talen Energy is a power and infrastructure company .

The company hasn’t admitted any wrongdoing but agreed to a $20 million settlement to resolve the ERISA class action lawsuit.

Under the terms of the Talen pension settlement, class members can receive payments based on their “group.” 

Group 1 class members are individuals who were terminated by a participating company. 

Group 2 class members are individuals who were not terminated by a participating company and would not have been eligible for the disputed benefits. 

Group membership will be determined by the class lawyers.

Group 2 class members can receive a payment of $4,000; group 1 class members each will receive an equal share of the remaining settlement fund. 

Class members may wish to consult a tax professional to determine how these settlement payments will affect their taxes .

There is no exclusion deadline for this settlement. The objection deadline is May 20, 2024.

The final approval hearing for the Talen pension settlement is scheduled for June 3, 2024.

Class members are not required to file a claim form in order to receive a settlement payment. However, class members must submit a rollover form by July 1, 2024, if they wish to roll their settlement payment into an existing retirement account.

Who’s Eligible

Individuals who were participants in the Talen Energy Retirement Plan between June 1, 2015, and Dec. 5, 2019.

Potential Award

Proof of purchase, rollover election form.

NOTE: If you do not qualify for this settlement do NOT file a claim.

Remember: you are submitting your claim under penalty of perjury . You are also harming other eligible Class Members by submitting a fraudulent claim. If you’re unsure if you qualify, please read the FAQ section of the Settlement Administrator’s website to ensure you meet all standards (Top Class Actions is not a Settlement Administrator). If you don’t qualify for this settlement, check out our database of other open class action settlements you may be eligible for.

Rollover Form Deadline

Durnack, et al. v. Retirement Plan Committee of Talen Energy Corp., et al. , Case No. 5:20-cv-5975-JLS, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

Final Hearing

Settlement website.

TalenPensionSettlement.com

Claims Administrator

Alan M Sandals SANDALS & ASSOCIATES PC. PO Box 385 Washington Depot, CT 06794  [email protected] 833-425-9595

Class Counsel

SANDALS & ASSOCIATES PC

BAZELON LESS & FELDMAN PC

KELLER ROHRBACK LLP

Defense Counsel

MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

Read About More Class Action Lawsuits & Class Action Settlements:

• Star Tribune Media VPPA $2.9M class action settlement
• Focus Plumbing discrimination, harassment $500K EEOC settlement
• First Advantage background checks class action settlement
• Greenridge Farm overtime $3M settlement

We tell you about cash you can claim EVERY WEEK! Sign up for our free newsletter.

• First Name *
• Country * United States Canada United Kingdom Other
• State * Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming
• Name This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

ATTORNEY ADVERTISING

Top Class Actions is a Proud Member of the American Bar Association

LEGAL INFORMATION IS NOT LEGAL ADVICE

Top Class Actions Legal Statement

©2008 – 2024 Top Class Actions® LLC

Various Trademarks held by their respective owners

This website is not intended for viewing or usage by European Union citizens.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. By submitting your comment and contact information, you agree to receive marketing emails from Top Class Actions regarding this and/or similar lawsuits or settlements, and/or to be contacted by an attorney or law firm to discuss the details of your potential case at no charge to you if you qualify. Required fields are marked *

Get Our Newsletter

We tell you about cash you can claim every week subscribe to our free newsletter today..

• Phone This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Unsolicited, illegal marketing robocalls lawsuit investigation

PFAS contamination in water supply lawsuit investigation

Please note: Top Class Actions is not a settlement administrator or law firm. Top Class Actions is a legal news source that reports on class action lawsuits, class action settlements, drug injury lawsuits and product liability lawsuits. Top Class Actions does not process claims and we cannot advise you on the status of any class action settlement claim. You must contact the settlement administrator or your attorney for any updates regarding your claim status, claim form or questions about when payments are expected to be mailed out.

Related Posts

X class action over discrimination against women employees escapes dismissal

Home Depot data breach exposes employee information

SH Group FCRA $630K class action settlement

Keller Williams class actions claim changes to profit-sharing program decreased distributions

X seeks arbitration in ex-security head firing lawsuit

UFC to pay $335M settlement to resolve wage-suppression allegations

Maryland Applicators employee misclassification $835K D.C. attorney general settlement

Employee’s SpaceX lawsuit claims she was subjected to discrimination, sexual abuse

New York Lyft driver sales tax, fees $38M attorney general settlement

Graphic Packaging International BIPA $998K class action settlement

Five Guys data breach class action settlement

Golden Corral class actions allege company failed to safeguard employees’ data

Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

The Practice of Law

• Law360 Pulse

Business of Law

Law360 authority, deep news & analysis, tax authority, employment authority, insurance authority, real estate authority, bankruptcy authority, healthcare authority.

• Law360 Employment Authority
• Law360 Tax Authority
• Law360 Insurance Authority
• Law360 Real Estate Authority
• Law360 Healthcare Authority
• Law360 Bankruptcy Authority

• Law360 In-Depth
• Law360 Podcasts
• Regional Powerhouses
• Law360's MVPs
• Women in Law Report
• Diversity Snapshot
• Practice Groups of the Year
• Rising Stars
• Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
• Adv. Search & Platform Tools
• About all sections
• Browse all sections

Class Action

• Competition
• Expert Analysis
• Intellectual Property
• Product Liability
• Track attorneys
• Track judges
• Join the Law360 team
• Search legal jobs
• Learn more about Law360
• Read testimonials
• Contact Law360
• Sign up for our newsletters
• Law360 Company
• About Law360 Authority
• Resource Library

February 05, 2021

Giguere v. Homeworks Energy, Inc. et al

Track this case

Case Number:

3:21-cv-30015

Massachusetts

Nature of Suit:

Labor: Fair Standards

Multi Party Litigation:

Mark G. Mastroianni

• Hayber McKenna
• Jackson Lewis PC

View recent docket activity

Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011. Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

• Direct access to case information and documents.
• All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
• Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
• No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Already have access? Click here to login

Get instant access to the one-stop news source for business lawyers, sign up now for free access to this content.

Enter your details below and select your area(s) of interest to stay ahead of the curve and receive Law360's daily newsletters

Email (NOTE: Free email domains not supported)

PLEASE NOTE: A verification email will be sent to your address before you can access your trial.

Password (at least 8 characters required)

Confirm Password

Get the best of Law360 in your inbox

Select at least one primary interest below to receive curated, daily newsletters designed by senior editors so you can quickly scan the latest news and analysis in your area of practice.

Law360 may contact you in your professional capacity with information about our other products, services and events that we believe may be of interest. You’ll be able to update your communication preferences via the unsubscribe link provided within our communications. We take your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy .

Already have access?

• Password: Forgot your password?
• Remember login
• I forgot my password
• I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
• How do I sign up for a newsletter?

How to get your money from FirstEnergy bribery settlement

COLUMBUS, Ohio — Money from FirstEnergy's class action lawsuit settlement is being sent out via an email that raised red flags for consumers. News 5 dove in to see if it was real or a scam.

Random emails offering you money seem too good to be true — and most times they are.

"It was right in my inbox and my personal account saying here, 'click me! I got money for you!'" said John Makley, a Cleveland FirstEnergy customer. "I'm like, wait a minute, who are you?"

That’s why Mackley reached out to News 5's Morgan Trau to verify if the class action lawsuit was legit.

He is one of the many Northeast Ohioans included in a nearly $50 million settlement from FirstEnergy and Energy Harbor, FirstEnergy's former spin-off. Consumers sued the companies because FirstEnergy bribed lawmakers to pass a law benefiting them, which increased the price of their services.

This June, former House Speaker Larry Householder got 20 years in prison for his role in the state’s largest bribery scheme. He accepted a $61 million bribe from FirstEnergy and other utilities in exchange for a $1.3 billion dollar bailout to help their struggling nuclear power plants.

This scandal was covered extensively by   News 5 , which followed the legislation all the way through the Statehouse, the arrests, trial, conviction and sentencing of Householder and former GOP leader Matt Borges.

RELATED: Former Ohio House Speaker Householder sentenced to 20 years in prison for state’s largest bribery scheme

"I never recall getting a notice that there was a lawsuit that I could opt out of," Makley said.

Class action lawsuits will typically have a consumer opt-out if they don't want to be part of it. The notices for this specific lawsuit, Smith v. FirstEnergy, were sent last year .

But Makley said he only got the email telling him he was getting a "virtual prepaid card." He got concerned when there was only one way to get payment — clicking a link in the email.

Case Western Reserve University consumer protection law professor Cathy Lesser Mansfield said Makley did the right thing by waiting.

"The problem with it is it's really hard to tell if it's coming from a legitimate sender and if it's really part of the class or if it's some kind of fraud," Lesser Mansfield said. "In most cases, these kinds of emails are fraudulent."

The email was sent by [email protected].

So how do you figure out if it’s fraud or real?

News 5 went to the website affiliated with the settlement, but it had no information about payment as of Friday at 5 p.m. Then, News 5 reached out to the settlement attorneys, and as it turns out, the email is real.

This confusion could have been avoided, Mansfield said.

"There should be an easily identifiable, 'click here to register for your payment' on the website so that people don't have to respond to what looks like a sketchy email," she said.

The attorneys on the case said online payment is the best way to do this because checks are expensive to print and use up settlement dollars.

When asked what he was going to buy with the settlement money, Makley had a laugh.

"I could probably get a couple of gallons of gas or a very cheap lunch from one of the fast food places," he said.

That’s right — the average amount a person gets from this settlement is $15.

"I feel better knowing that it is real," he said. "I'll be confident to claim my lunch money."

No matter if it's $7.87 cents like Makley got — or thousands — be skeptical if someone is asking for personal information.

Find details on the settlement here.

RELATED: FirstEnergy subpoenaed by state for role in $61 million bribery scheme

Follow WEWS statehouse reporter Morgan Trau on Twitter and Facebook .

Sign up for What Happened Now? - a daily email newsletter spotlighting the top news in the Cleveland area each day.

Now signed up to receive the what happened now.

Click here to see how we follow through

Levi & Korsinsky Notifies Sunnova Energy International Inc. Investors of a Class Action Lawsuit and Upcoming Deadline - NOVA

NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / April 16, 2024 / If you suffered a loss on your Sunnova Energy International Inc. (NYSE:NOVA) investment and want to learn about a potential recovery under the federal securities laws, follow the link below for more information:

https://zlk.com/pslra-1/sunnova-lawsuit-submission-form?prid=75765&wire=1

or contact Joseph E. Levi, Esq. via email at [email protected] or call (212) 363-7500 to speak to our team of experienced shareholder advocates.

THE LAWSUIT: A class action securities lawsuit was filed against Sunnova Energy International Inc. that seeks to recover losses of shareholders who were adversely affected by alleged securities fraud between February 25, 2020 and December 7, 2023.

CASE DETAILS: The filed complaint alleges that defendants made false statements and/or concealed that: (i) Sunnova routinely engaged in predatory business practices against disadvantaged homeowners and communities, the same groups that Project Hestia, a new solar loan channel, was purportedly intended to benefit; (ii) the foregoing conduct subjected the company to a heightened risk of regulatory and/or governmental scrutiny, as well as significant reputational and/or financial harm; and (iii) as a result, the Company's public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

WHAT'S NEXT? If you suffered a loss in Sunnova stock during the relevant time frame - even if you still hold your shares - go to https://zlk.com/pslra-1/sunnova-lawsuit-submission-form?prid=75765&wire=1 to learn about your rights to seek a recovery. There is no cost or obligation to participate.

WHY LEVI & KORSINSKY: Over the past 20 years, Levi & Korsinsky LLP has established itself as a nationally-recognized securities litigation firm that has secured hundreds of millions of dollars for aggrieved shareholders and built a track record of winning high-stakes cases. The firm has extensive expertise representing investors in complex securities litigation and a team of over 70 employees to serve our clients. For seven years in a row, Levi & Korsinsky has ranked in ISS Securities Class Action Services' Top 50 Report as one of the top securities litigation firms in the United States. Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes.

CONTACT: Levi & Korsinsky, LLP Joseph E. Levi, Esq. Ed Korsinsky, Esq. 33 Whitehall Street, 17th Floor New York, NY 10004 [email protected] Tel: (212) 363-7500 Fax: (212) 363-7171 https://zlk.com/

SOURCE: Levi & Korsinsky, LLP

•   Weather

Search location by ZIP code

Suit claims solar power firms deceived customers, skirted law, attorneys seek class action designation for case.

• Copy Link Copy {copyShortcut} to copy Link copied!

GET LOCAL BREAKING NEWS ALERTS

The latest breaking updates, delivered straight to your email inbox.

A lawsuit filed in federal court seeks class action status -- and the inclusion of as many as 2,500 homeowners who signed agreements with certain local solar power companies.

If a judge grants that status, almost any Louisiana homeowner who did business with the solar panel installation companies named in the suit could become party to the claim.

Related Content

• I-Team: Despite no contractor's license, Sader Power partners with South Carolina-based company
• Solar power leader didn't disclose past problem
• La. Licensing Board For Contractors takes action against Sader Power; Owner admits he has no license
• State contractor board demands solar power company appear after allegations made

The defendants in the case are Sader Power, LLC, Sader Power Enterprises, LLC, and Griswold Power, LLC. All three are accused of operating without the proper certifications and of misleading customers about the costs and potential savings of solar energy systems.

One of the attorneys who filed the suit on behalf of Twyla and Clement Torregano, of Gentilly, told WDSU it was "the only step left" for his clients.

The filing reads, in part: "Defendants purposefully overstated the solar power savings of the equipment to the point of customers believing that they would no longer get an energy bill... The actual utility cost savings realized by the Defendants' customers are far less than advertised."

The suit continues: "Defendants do not have a Louisiana State Contractors' License with a classification of Solar Energy Equipment, in contravention of Louisiana law."

The case was filed in federal court in New Orleans on Feb. 7, just days after the WDSU I-Team sat down with Jon Sader, an officer of both Sader Power and Sader Power Enterprises, regarding questions that included the matter of licensing.

Sader said his companies (one that he describes as research driven, the other handling installations) operate within the law because Sader Power Enterprises hires other contractors to work on the projects.

"We exceed all contractor standards," he said. "Our staff of contractors and electricians with solar designations that work for us -- we purposely work with (general contractors) across the state to support general contractors and electricians, rather than license ourselves."

After the lawsuit was filed, Sader provided the following statement: "The Office of the Attorney General for Louisiana has reviewed in detail the contracts and agreements utilized by Sader Power Enterprises. We are confident that we are not in violation of any state or federal law."

A message left with a law firm representing Griswold Power has not been returned, and all of the defendants have yet to respond to the lawsuit.

Upcoming Deadline to Share in Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) Class Action Settlement

L evi & Korsinsky informs shareholders that a settlement has been reached in the pending class action lawsuit against Bloom Energy Corporation ( NYSE:BE ). The settlement provides for a fund of $3,000,000 to benefit class members. For the purposes of the settlement, the class is defined as: on behalf of a class consisting of all persons and entities other than Defendants who: (1) purchased or otherwise acquired Bloom securities pursuant and/or traceable to Bloom’s Registration Statement issued in connection with Bloom’s July 2018 initial public stock offering or (2) purchased the publicly traded securities of Bloom between July 26, 2018 and September 16, 2019.

If you are a class member as defined above, you may be entitled to a pro-rata share of the settlement fund. In order to receive a share of the settlement, you must file a claim form by March 29, 2024.

For more details on the settlement, including a copy of the claim form, please visit: https://zlk.com/settlement-form?redirect=aHR0cHM6Ly96bGsuY29tL3NldHRsZW1lbnQvYmxvb20tZW5lcmd5LWNvcnBvcmF0aW9uLXNldHRsZW1lbnQ=&ticker=BE&wire=18

Levi & Korsinsky did not act as lead counsel or otherwise participate in litigating the above class action. We are providing this information as a courtesy to remind class members of the claims deadline so they can file their forms in a timely fashion.

Over the past 20 years, the team at Levi & Korsinsky has secured hundreds of millions of dollars for aggrieved shareholders and built a track record of winning high-stakes cases. Our firm has extensive expertise representing investors in complex securities litigation and a team of over 70 employees to serve our clients. For seven years in a row, Levi & Korsinsky has ranked in ISS Securities Class Action Services’ Top 50 Report as one of the top securities litigation firms in the United States.

Levi & Korsinsky, LLP

Joseph E. Levi, Esq.

Ed Korsinsky, Esq.

33 Whitehall Street, 17th Floor

New York, NY 10004

[email protected]

Tel: (212) 363-7500

Fax: (212) 363-7171

https://zlk.com/

Hermes hires Latham team to fight consumers’ Birkin bag lawsuit

• Medium Text

• Company Hermes International SCA Follow

Get a quick look at the days breaking legal news and analysis from The Afternoon Docket newsletter. Sign up here.

Reporting by Mike Scarcella

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles. New Tab , opens new tab

Read Next / Editor's Picks

Industry Insight Chevron

Mike Scarcella, David Thomas

Karen Sloan

Henry Engler

Diana Novak Jones

Sesame Place Beats Class Certification in Discrimination Suit

By Peter Hayes

Sesame Place, a Sesame Street-themed amusement park owned by SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment Inc. , defeated certification of class action claims that they failed to address biases in their employees.

The plaintiffs, a group of Black and Hispanic families who visited the Langhorne, Pa., park in 2021 and 2022, allege that character performers refused to interact with their kids during parades and meet-and-greets but chose to hug, wave to, and dance with White children.

The plaintiffs sought to certify a class to resolve one issue: “Whether SeaWorld intentionally refused to identify and address overt and/or implicit biases in its park ...

Learn more about Bloomberg Law or Log In to keep reading:

Learn about bloomberg law.

AI-powered legal analytics, workflow tools and premium legal & business news.

Already a subscriber?

Log in to keep reading or access research tools.