bring back the death penalty essay

5 Death Penalty Essays Everyone Should Know

Capital punishment is an ancient practice. It’s one that human rights defenders strongly oppose and consider as inhumane and cruel. In 2019, Amnesty International reported the lowest number of executions in about a decade. Most executions occurred in China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, and Egypt . The United States is the only developed western country still using capital punishment. What does this say about the US? Here are five essays about the death penalty everyone should read:

“When We Kill”

By: Nicholas Kristof | From: The New York Times 2019

In this excellent essay, Pulitizer-winner Nicholas Kristof explains how he first became interested in the death penalty. He failed to write about a man on death row in Texas. The man, Cameron Todd Willingham, was executed in 2004. Later evidence showed that the crime he supposedly committed – lighting his house on fire and killing his three kids – was more likely an accident. In “When We Kill,” Kristof puts preconceived notions about the death penalty under the microscope. These include opinions such as only guilty people are executed, that those guilty people “deserve” to die, and the death penalty deters crime and saves money. Based on his investigations, Kristof concludes that they are all wrong.

Nicholas Kristof has been a Times columnist since 2001. He’s the winner of two Pulitizer Prices for his coverage of China and the Darfur genocide.

“An Inhumane Way of Death”

By: Willie Jasper Darden, Jr.

Willie Jasper Darden, Jr. was on death row for 14 years. In his essay, he opens with the line, “Ironically, there is probably more hope on death row than would be found in most other places.” He states that everyone is capable of murder, questioning if people who support capital punishment are just as guilty as the people they execute. Darden goes on to say that if every murderer was executed, there would be 20,000 killed per day. Instead, a person is put on death row for something like flawed wording in an appeal. Darden feels like he was picked at random, like someone who gets a terminal illness. This essay is important to read as it gives readers a deeper, more personal insight into death row.

Willie Jasper Darden, Jr. was sentenced to death in 1974 for murder. During his time on death row, he advocated for his innocence and pointed out problems with his trial, such as the jury pool that excluded black people. Despite worldwide support for Darden from public figures like the Pope, Darden was executed in 1988.

“We Need To Talk About An Injustice”

By: Bryan Stevenson | From: TED 2012

This piece is a transcript of Bryan Stevenson’s 2012 TED talk, but we feel it’s important to include because of Stevenson’s contributions to criminal justice. In the talk, Stevenson discusses the death penalty at several points. He points out that for years, we’ve been taught to ask the question, “Do people deserve to die for their crimes?” Stevenson brings up another question we should ask: “Do we deserve to kill?” He also describes the American death penalty system as defined by “error.” Somehow, society has been able to disconnect itself from this problem even as minorities are disproportionately executed in a country with a history of slavery.

Bryan Stevenson is a lawyer, founder of the Equal Justice Initiative, and author. He’s argued in courts, including the Supreme Court, on behalf of the poor, minorities, and children. A film based on his book Just Mercy was released in 2019 starring Michael B. Jordan and Jamie Foxx.

“I Know What It’s Like To Carry Out Executions”

By: S. Frank Thompson | From: The Atlantic 2019

In the death penalty debate, we often hear from the family of the victims and sometimes from those on death row. What about those responsible for facilitating an execution? In this opinion piece, a former superintendent from the Oregon State Penitentiary outlines his background. He carried out the only two executions in Oregon in the past 55 years, describing it as having a “profound and traumatic effect” on him. In his decades working as a correctional officer, he concluded that the death penalty is not working . The United States should not enact federal capital punishment.

Frank Thompson served as the superintendent of OSP from 1994-1998. Before that, he served in the military and law enforcement. When he first started at OSP, he supported the death penalty. He changed his mind when he observed the protocols firsthand and then had to conduct an execution.

“There Is No Such Thing As Closure on Death Row”

By: Paul Brown | From: The Marshall Project 2019

This essay is from Paul Brown, a death row inmate in Raleigh, North Carolina. He recalls the moment of his sentencing in a cold courtroom in August. The prosecutor used the term “closure” when justifying a death sentence. Who is this closure for? Brown theorizes that the prosecutors are getting closure as they end another case, but even then, the cases are just a way to further their careers. Is it for victims’ families? Brown is doubtful, as the death sentence is pursued even when the families don’t support it. There is no closure for Brown or his family as they wait for his execution. Vivid and deeply-personal, this essay is a must-read for anyone who wonders what it’s like inside the mind of a death row inmate.

Paul Brown has been on death row since 2000 for a double murder. He is a contributing writer to Prison Writers and shares essays on topics such as his childhood, his life as a prisoner, and more.

15 Great Charities to Donate to in 2024

15 Quotes Exposing Injustice in Society

14 Trusted Charities Helping Civilians in Palestine

The Great Migration: History, Causes and Facts

Social Change 101: Meaning, Examples, Learning Opportunities

Rosa Parks: Biography, Quotes, Impact

Top 20 Issues Women Are Facing Today

Top 20 Issues Children Are Facing Today

15 Root Causes of Climate Change

15 Facts about Rosa Parks

Abolitionist Movement: History, Main Ideas, and Activism Today

The Biggest 15 NGOs in the UK

About the author, emmaline soken-huberty.

Emmaline Soken-Huberty is a freelance writer based in Portland, Oregon. She started to become interested in human rights while attending college, eventually getting a concentration in human rights and humanitarianism. LGBTQ+ rights, women’s rights, and climate change are of special concern to her. In her spare time, she can be found reading or enjoying Oregon’s natural beauty with her husband and dog.

Share full article

Supported by

The Death Penalty Can Ensure ‘Justice Is Being Done’

A top Justice Department official says for many Americans the death penalty is a difficult issue on moral, religious and policy grounds. But as a legal issue, it is straightforward.

By Jeffrey A. Rosen

Mr. Rosen is the deputy attorney general.

This month, for the first time in 17 years , the United States resumed carrying out death sentences for federal crimes.

On July 14, Daniel Lewis Lee was executed for the 1996 murder of a family, including an 8-year-old girl, by suffocating and drowning them in the Illinois Bayou after robbing them to fund a white-supremacist organization. On July 16, Wesley Purkey was executed for the 1998 murder of a teenage girl, whom he kidnapped, raped, killed, dismembered and discarded in a septic pond. The next day, Dustin Honken was executed for five murders committed in 1993, including the execution-style shooting of two young girls, their mother, and two prospective witnesses against him in a federal prosecution for methamphetamine trafficking.

The death penalty is a difficult issue for many Americans on moral, religious and policy grounds. But as a legal issue, it is straightforward. The United States Constitution expressly contemplates “capital” crimes, and Congress has authorized the death penalty for serious federal offenses since President George Washington signed the Crimes Act of 1790. The American people have repeatedly ratified that decision, including through the Federal Death Penalty Act of 1994 signed by President Bill Clinton, the federal execution of Timothy McVeigh under President George W. Bush and the decision by President Barack Obama’s Justice Department to seek the death penalty against the Boston Marathon bomber and Dylann Roof .

The recent executions reflect that consensus, as the Justice Department has an obligation to carry out the law. The decision to seek the death penalty against Mr. Lee was made by Attorney General Janet Reno (who said she personally opposed the death penalty but was bound by the law) and reaffirmed by Deputy Attorney General Eric Holder.

Mr. Purkey was prosecuted during the George W. Bush administration, and his conviction and sentence were vigorously defended throughout the Obama administration. The judge who imposed the death sentence on Mr. Honken, Mark Bennett, said that while he generally opposed the death penalty, he would not lose any sleep over Mr. Honken’s execution.

In a New York Times Op-Ed essay published on July 17 , two of Mr. Lee’s lawyers criticized the execution of their client, which they contend was carried out in a “shameful rush.” That objection overlooks that Mr. Lee was sentenced more than 20 years ago, and his appeals and other permissible challenges failed, up to and including the day of his execution.

Mr. Lee’s lawyers seem to endorse a system of endless delays that prevent a death sentence from ever becoming real. But his execution date was announced almost a year ago, and was initially set for last December. It was delayed when his lawyers obtained six more months of review by unsuccessfully challenging the procedures used to carry out his lethal injection.

After an appellate court rejected their claim as “without merit,” the Justice Department rescheduled Mr. Lee’s execution, providing an additional four weeks of notice. Yet on the day of the rescheduled execution, after family members of his victims had traveled to Terre Haute, Ind., to witness the execution, a District Court granted Mr. Lee’s request for further review. That court entered a last-minute reprieve that the Supreme Court has said should be an “extreme exception.”

Given the long delay that had already occurred, the Justice Department asked the Supreme Court to lift the order so the execution could proceed. Mr. Lee’s lawyers opposed that request, insisting that overturning the order would result in their client’s imminent execution. After reviewing the matter, the court granted the government’s request , rebuked the District Court for creating an unjustified last-minute barrier, and directed that the execution could proceed.

In the final minutes before the execution was to occur, Mr. Lee’s lawyers claimed the execution could not proceed because Mr. Lee still had time to seek further review of an appellate court decision six weeks earlier lifting a prior stay of execution. The Justice Department decided to pause the execution for several hours while the appellate court considered and promptly rejected Mr. Lee’s request. That cautious step, taken to ensure undoubted compliance with court orders, is irreconcilable with the suggestion that the department “rushed” the execution or disregarded any law. Mr. Lee’s final hours awaiting his fate were a result of his own lawyers’ choice to assert a non-meritorious objection at the last moment.

Mr. Lee’s lawyers also disregarded the cost to victims’ families of continued delay. Although they note that some members of Mr. Lee’s victims’ families opposed his execution, others did not. Nor did the family members of Wesley Purkey’s victim, Jennifer Long, who were in Terre Haute on Wednesday afternoon. When the District Court again imposed another last-minute stoppage, granting more time for Mr. Purkey’s lawyers to argue (among other things) that he did not understand the reason for his execution, the Justice Department again sought Supreme Court review.

As the hours wore on, Justice Department officials asked Ms. Long’s father if he would prefer to wait for another day. The answer was unequivocal: He would stay as long as it took. As Ms. Long’s stepmother later said, “We just shouldn’t have had to wait this long.” The Supreme Court ultimately authorized the execution just before 3 a.m. In his final statement, Mr. Purkey apologized to “Jennifer’s family” for the pain he had caused, contradicting the claim of his lawyers that he did not understand the reason for his execution.

The third execution, of Dustin Honken, occurred on schedule, but still too late for some of his victims’ families. John Duncan — the father of the victim Lori Duncan and grandfather of her slain daughters, Kandace (age 10) and Amber (age 6) — had urged Mr. Honken’s execution for years. As John Duncan was dying of cancer in 2018, he asked family members to promise they would witness the execution on his behalf. On July 17, they did. “Finally,” they said in a statement, “justice is being done.”

Mr. Lee’s lawyers and other death penalty opponents are entitled to disagree with that sentiment. But if the United States is going to allow capital punishment, a white-supremacist triple murderer would seem the textbook example of a justified case. And if death sentences are going to be imposed, they cannot just be hypothetical; they eventually have to be carried out, or the punishment will lose its deterrent and retributive effects.

Rather than forthrightly opposing the death penalty and attempting to change the law through democratic means, however, Mr. Lee’s lawyers and others have chosen the legal and public-relations equivalent of guerrilla war. They sought to obstruct by any means the administration of sentences that Congress permitted, juries supported and the Supreme Court approved. And when those tactics failed, they accused the Justice Department of “a grave threat to the rule of law,” even though it operated entirely within the law enacted by Congress and approved by the Supreme Court. The American people can decide for themselves which aspects of that process should be considered “shameful.”

Jeffrey A. Rosen is the deputy attorney general.

The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips . And here’s our email: [email protected] .

Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook , Twitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram .

Essays About the Death Penalty: Top 5 Examples and Prompts

The death penalty is a major point of contention all around the world. Read our guide so you can write well-informed essays about the death penalty.

Out of all the issues at the forefront of public discourse today, few are as hotly debated as the death penalty. As its name suggests, the death penalty involves the execution of a criminal as punishment for their transgressions. The death penalty has always been, and continues to be, an emotionally and politically charged essay topic.

Arguments about the death penalty are more motivated by feelings and emotions; many proponents are people seeking punishment for the killers of their loved ones, while many opponents are mourning the loss of loved ones executed through the death penalty. There may also be a religious aspect to support and oppose the policy.

1. The Issues of Death Penalties and Social Justice in The United States (Author Unknown)

2. serving justice with death penalty by rogelio elliott, 3. can you be christian and support the death penalty by matthew schmalz, 4. death penalty: persuasive essay by jerome glover, 5. the death penalty by kamala harris, top 5 writing prompts on essays about the death penalty, 1. death penalty: do you support or oppose it, 2. how has the death penalty changed throughout history, 3. the status of capital punishment in your country, 4. death penalty and poverty, 5. does the death penalty serve as a deterrent for serious crimes, 6. what are the pros and cons of the death penalty vs. life imprisonment , 7. how is the death penalty different in japan vs. the usa, 8. why do some states use the death penalty and not others, 9. what are the most common punishments selected by prisoners for execution, 10. should the public be allowed to view an execution, 11. discuss the challenges faced by the judicial system in obtaining lethal injection doses, 12. should the death penalty be used for juveniles, 13. does the death penalty have a racial bias to it.

“Executing another person only creates a cycle of vengeance and death where if all of the rationalities and political structures are dropped, the facts presented at the end of the day is that a man is killed because he killed another man, so when does it end? Human life is to be respected and appreciated, not thrown away as if it holds no meaningful value.”

This essay discusses several reasons to oppose the death penalty in the United States. First, the author cites the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, saying that the death penalty is inhumane and deprives people of life. Human life should be respected, and death should not be responded to with another death. In addition, the author cites evidence showing that the death penalty does not deter crime nor gives closure to victims’ families.

Check out these essays about police brutality .

“Capital punishment follows the constitution and does not break any of the amendments. Specific people deserve to be punished in this way for the crime they commit. It might immoral to people but that is not the point of the death penalty. The death penalty is not “killing for fun”. The death penalty serves justice. When justice is served, it prevents other people from becoming the next serial killer. It’s simple, the death penalty strikes fear.”

Elliott supports the death penalty, writing that it gives criminals what they deserve. After all, those who commit “small” offenses will not be executed anyway. In addition, it reinforces the idea that justice comes to wrongdoers. Finally, he states that the death penalty is constitutional and is supported by many Americans.

“The letter states that this development of Catholic doctrine is consistent with the thought of the two previous popes: St. Pope John Paul II and Benedict XVI. St. John Paul II maintained that capital punishment should be reserved only for “absolute necessity.” Benedict XVI also supported efforts to eliminate the death penalty. Most important, however, is that Pope Francis is emphasizing an ethic of forgiveness. The Pope has argued that social justice applies to all citizens. He also believes that those who harm society should make amends through acts that affirm life, not death.”

Schmalz discusses the Catholic position on the death penalty. Many early Catholic leaders believed that the death penalty was justified; however, Pope Francis writes that “modern methods of imprisonment effectively protect society from criminals,” and executions are unnecessary. Therefore, the Catholic Church today opposes the death penalty and strives to protect life.

“There are many methods of execution, like electrocution, gas chamber, hanging, firing squad and lethal injection. For me, I just watched once on TV, but it’s enough to bring me nightmares. We only live once and we will lose anything we once had without life. Life is precious and can’t just be taken away that easily. In my opinion, I think Canada shouldn’t adopt the death penalty as its most severe form of criminal punishment.”

Glover’s essay acknowledges reasons why people might support the death penalty; however, he believes that these are not enough for him to support it. He believes capital punishment is inhumane and should not be implemented in Canada. It deprives people of a second chance and does not teach wrongdoers much of a lesson. In addition, it is inhumane and deprives people of their right to life.

“Let’s be clear: as a former prosecutor, I absolutely and strongly believe there should be serious and swift consequences when one person kills another. I am unequivocal in that belief. We can — and we should — always pursue justice in the name of victims and give dignity to the families that grieve. But in our democracy, a death sentence carried out by the government does not constitute justice for those who have been put to death and proven innocent after the fact.”

This short essay was written by the then-presidential candidate and current U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris to explain her campaign’s stance on the death penalty. First, she believes it does not execute justice and is likely to commit injustice by sentencing innocent people to death. In addition, it is said to disproportionally affect nonwhite people. Finally, it is more fiscally responsible for abolishing capital punishment, as it uses funds that could be used for education and healthcare.

This topic always comes first to mind when thinking of what to write. For a strong argumentative essay, consider the death penalty and list its pros and cons. Then, conclude whether or not it would be beneficial to reinstate or keep the policy. There is an abundance of sources you can gather inspiration from, including the essay examples listed above and countless other online sources.

People have been put to death as a punishment since the dawn of recorded history, but as morals and technology have changed, the application of the death penalty has evolved. This essay will explore how the death penalty has been used and carried out throughout history.

This essay will examine both execution methods and when capital punishment is ordered. A few points to explore in this essay include:

Thousands of years ago, “an eye for an eye” was the standard. How were executions carried out in ancient history?
The religious context of executions during the middle ages is worth exploring. When was someone burned at the stake?
The guillotine became a popular method of execution during the renaissance period. How does this method compare to both ancient execution methods and modern methods?
The most common execution methods in the modern era include the firing squad, hanging, lethal injections, gas chambers, and electrocution. How do these methods compare to older forms of execution?

Choose a country, preferably your home country, and look into the death penalty status: is it being implemented or not? If you wish, you can also give a brief history of the death penalty in your chosen country and your thoughts. You do not necessarily need to write about your own country; however, picking your homeland may provide better insight.

Critics of the death penalty argue that it is anti-poor, as a poor person accused of a crime punishable by death lacks the resources to hire a good lawyer to defend them adequately. For your essay, reflect on this issue and write about your thoughts. Is it inhumane for the poor? After all, poor people will not have sufficient resources to hire good lawyers, regardless of the punishment.

This is one of the biggest debates in the justice system. While the justice system has been set up to punish, it should also deter people from committing crimes. Does the death penalty do an adequate job at deterring crimes?

This essay should lay out the evidence that shows how the death penalty either does or does not deter crime. A few points to explore in this essay include:

Which crimes have the death penalty as the ultimate punishment?
How does the murder rate compare to states that do not have the death penalty in states with the death penalty?
Are there confounding factors that must be taken into consideration with this comparison? How do they play a role?

Essays about the Death Penalty: What are the pros and cons of the death penalty vs. Life imprisonment?

This is one of the most straightforward ways to explore the death penalty. If the death penalty is to be removed from criminal cases, it must be replaced with something else. The most logical alternative is life imprisonment.

There is no “right” answer to this question, but a strong argumentative essay could take one side over another in this death penalty debate. A few points to explore in this essay include:

Some people would rather be put to death instead of imprisoned in a cell for life. Should people have the right to decide which punishment they accept?
What is the cost of the death penalty versus imprisoning someone for life? Even though it can be expensive to imprison someone for life, remember that most death penalty cases are appealed numerous times before execution.
Would the death penalty be more acceptable if specific execution methods were used instead of others?

Few first-world countries still use the death penalty. However, Japan and the United States are two of the biggest users of the death sentence.

This is an interesting compare and contrast essay worth exploring. In addition, this essay can explore the differences in how executions are carried out. Some of the points to explore include:

What are the execution methods countries use? The execution method in the United States can vary from state to state, but Japan typically uses hanging. Is this considered a cruel and unusual punishment?
In the United States, death row inmates know their execution date. In Japan, they do not. So which is better for the prisoner?
How does the public in the United States feel about the death penalty versus public opinion in Japan? Should this influence when, how, and if executions are carried out in the respective countries?

In the United States, justice is typically administered at the state level unless a federal crime has been committed. So why do some states have the death penalty and not others?

This essay will examine which states have the death penalty and make the most use of this form of punishment as part of the legal system. A few points worth exploring in this essay include:

When did various states outlaw the death penalty (if they do not use it today)?
Which states execute the most prisoners? Some states to mention are Texas and Oklahoma.
Do the states that have the death penalty differ in when the death penalty is administered?
Is this sentence handed down by the court system or by the juries trying the individual cases in states with the death penalty?

It might be interesting to see if certain prisoners have selected a specific execution method to make a political statement. Numerous states allow prisoners to select how they will be executed. The most common methods include lethal injections, firing squads, electric chairs, gas chambers, and hanging.

It might be interesting to see if certain prisoners have selected a specific execution method to make a political statement. Some of the points this essay might explore include:

When did these different execution methods become options for execution?
Which execution methods are the most common in the various states that offer them?
Is one method considered more “humane” than others? If so, why?

One of the topics recently discussed is whether the public should be allowed to view an execution.

There are many potential directions to go with this essay, and all of these points are worth exploring. A few topics to explore in this essay include:

In the past, executions were carried out in public places. There are a few countries, particularly in the Middle East, where this is still the case. So why were executions carried out in public?
In some situations, individuals directly involved in the case, such as the victim’s loved ones, are permitted to view the execution. Does this bring a sense of closure?
Should executions be carried out in private? Does this reduce transparency in the justice system?

Lethal injection is one of the most common modes of execution. The goal is to put the person to sleep and remove their pain. Then, a cocktail is used to stop their heart. Unfortunately, many companies have refused to provide states with the drugs needed for a lethal injection. A few points to explore include:

Doctors and pharmacists have said it is against the oath they took to “not harm.” Is this true? What impact does this have?
If someone is giving the injection without medical training, how does this impact the prisoner?
Have states decided to use other more “harmful” modes of execution because they can’t get what they need for the lethal injection?

There are certain crimes, such as murder, where the death penalty is a possible punishment across the country. Even though minors can be tried as adults in some situations, they typically cannot be given the death penalty.

It might be interesting to see what legal experts and victims of juvenile capital crimes say about this important topic. A few points to explore include:

How does the brain change and evolve as someone grows?
Do juveniles have a higher rate of rehabilitation than adults?
Should the wishes of the victim’s family play a role in the final decision?

The justice system, and its unjust impact on minorities , have been a major area of research during the past few decades. It might be worth exploring if the death penalty is disproportionately used in cases involving minorities.

It might be worth looking at numbers from Amnesty International or the Innocence Project to see what the numbers show. A strong essay might also propose ways to make justice system cases more equitable and fair. A few points worth exploring include:

Of the cases where the death penalty has been levied, what percentage of the cases involve a minority perpetrator?
Do stays of execution get granted more often in cases involving white people versus minorities?
Do white people get handed a sentence of life in prison without parole more often than people of minority descent?

If you’d like to learn more, our writer explains how to write an argumentative essay in this guide.

For help with your essay, check our round-up of best essay writing apps .

Martin is an avid writer specializing in editing and proofreading. He also enjoys literary analysis and writing about food and travel.

View all posts

Reconsidering the Death Penalty: a Student’s Perspective

This essay is about the death penalty, also known as SMU (State-Mandated Execution), from the perspective of a student in higher education. It examines the ethical and moral complexities surrounding capital punishment, highlighting concerns about its irreversible nature, disproportionate impact on marginalized communities, and ineffectiveness as a deterrent against crime. The essay advocates for alternative approaches to addressing crime and promoting justice, such as restorative justice practices, which prioritize rehabilitation, accountability, and healing. Ultimately, it underscores the need for a critical reevaluation of the death penalty and a commitment to creating a more just and equitable society. On PapersOwl, there’s also a selection of free essay templates associated with Death Penalty.

How it works

As a student of higher education, I find myself grappling with complex moral and ethical dilemmas, one of which is the issue of the death penalty. The debate surrounding the implementation of capital punishment has long been contentious, raising profound questions about justice, human rights, and the role of the state in administering punishment.

The death penalty, often abbreviated as “SMU” (State-Mandated Execution), is the most severe form of punishment imposed by the state, resulting in the deliberate taking of a person’s life as a consequence for a capital offense.

While proponents argue that it serves as a deterrent against heinous crimes and provides justice for victims and their families, opponents raise significant concerns about its efficacy, fairness, and irreversible consequences.

One of the primary arguments against the death penalty is its irreversibility. Unlike other forms of punishment, such as imprisonment, death is final and precludes the possibility of rectifying any miscarriages of justice. The risk of executing innocent individuals, due to flaws in the legal system or inadequate defense representation, is a grave concern that cannot be overlooked. The possibility of condemning an innocent person to death is a moral dilemma that challenges the very foundation of our justice system.

Furthermore, the death penalty disproportionately impacts marginalized and vulnerable communities. Studies have shown that individuals from racial and ethnic minorities, as well as those from low-income backgrounds, are more likely to be sentenced to death. This raises troubling questions about systemic biases and inequalities within the criminal justice system, undermining the principle of equal protection under the law.

Additionally, the death penalty has been criticized for its failure to serve as an effective deterrent against crime. Empirical evidence suggests that the threat of execution does not significantly reduce the incidence of violent crime. Instead, resources allocated to the death penalty could be redirected towards crime prevention, rehabilitation, and support services for victims and their families.

As a student, I am compelled to consider alternative approaches to addressing crime and promoting justice. Restorative justice practices, which focus on repairing harm, fostering accountability, and facilitating reconciliation between offenders and victims, offer a more holistic and humane approach to dealing with wrongdoing. By prioritizing rehabilitation and community-based interventions, we can address the root causes of crime and promote healing and restoration.

In conclusion, the death penalty remains a deeply divisive issue that elicits strong emotions and impassioned debate. As a student of higher education, I believe it is imperative to critically examine the moral, ethical, and practical implications of capital punishment. While proponents may argue for its deterrent effect and retributive justice, the inherent risks of irreversibility, systemic bias, and ineffectiveness cannot be ignored. As we strive to create a more just and equitable society, we must consider alternative approaches that prioritize healing, restoration, and the dignity of all individuals involved.

Cite this page

Reconsidering the Death Penalty: A Student's Perspective. (2024, Mar 01). Retrieved from https://papersowl.com/examples/reconsidering-the-death-penalty-a-students-perspective/

"Reconsidering the Death Penalty: A Student's Perspective." PapersOwl.com , 1 Mar 2024, https://papersowl.com/examples/reconsidering-the-death-penalty-a-students-perspective/

PapersOwl.com. (2024). Reconsidering the Death Penalty: A Student's Perspective . [Online]. Available at: https://papersowl.com/examples/reconsidering-the-death-penalty-a-students-perspective/ [Accessed: 13 Apr. 2024]

"Reconsidering the Death Penalty: A Student's Perspective." PapersOwl.com, Mar 01, 2024. Accessed April 13, 2024. https://papersowl.com/examples/reconsidering-the-death-penalty-a-students-perspective/

"Reconsidering the Death Penalty: A Student's Perspective," PapersOwl.com , 01-Mar-2024. [Online]. Available: https://papersowl.com/examples/reconsidering-the-death-penalty-a-students-perspective/. [Accessed: 13-Apr-2024]

Don't let plagiarism ruin your grade

Hire a writer to get a unique paper crafted to your needs.

Our writers will help you fix any mistakes and get an A+!

Please check your inbox.

You can order an original essay written according to your instructions.

Trusted by over 1 million students worldwide

1. Tell Us Your Requirements

2. Pick your perfect writer

3. Get Your Paper and Pay

Hi! I'm Amy, your personal assistant!

Don't know where to start? Give me your paper requirements and I connect you to an academic expert.

short deadlines

100% Plagiarism-Free

Certified writers

Persuasive Essay Writing

Persuasive Essay About Death Penalty

Craft an Effective Argument: Examples of Persuasive Essay About Death Penalty

Published on: Jan 27, 2023

Last updated on: Jan 29, 2024

What Do We Mean by a Persuasive Essay?

A persuasive essay is a type of writing that attempts to persuade the reader or audience.

This essay usually presents an argument supported by evidence and examples. The main aim is to convince the reader or audience to take action or accept a certain viewpoint.

Persuasive essays may be written from a neutral or biased perspective and contain personal opinions.

To do this, you must provide clear reasoning and evidence to support your argument. Persuasive essays can take many forms, including speeches, letters, articles, and opinion pieces.

It is important to consider the audience when writing a persuasive essay. The language used should be tailored to their understanding of the topic.

Read our comprehensive guide on persuasive essays to know all about crafting excellent essays.

Paper Due? Why Suffer? That's our Job!

Let's move on to some examples so that you can better understand this topic.

Persuasive Essay About Death Penalty Examples

Are you feeling stuck with the task of writing a persuasive essay about the death penalty?

Looking for some examples to get your ideas flowing?

Youâre in luck â weâve got just the thing! Take a look at these free downloadable examples.

Example of a Persuasive essay about death penalty

Persuasive essay about death penalty in the Philippines

Short Persuasive essay about death penalty

Persuasive essay about death penalty should be abolished

The death penalty pros and cons essay

Looking for some more examples on persuasive essays? Check out our blog about persuasive essay examples !

Argumentative Essay About Death Penalty Examples

We have compiled some of the best examples to help you start crafting your essay.

These examples will provide dynamic perspectives and insights from real-world legal cases to personal essays.

Have a look at them to get inspired!!

Argumentative essay about death penalty in the Philippines

Argumentative essay about death penalty with introduction body conclusion

Argumentative essay about death penalty should be abolished

Argumentative essay about death penalty conclusion

6 Tips To Write an A+ Persuasive Essay

We know it can be daunting to compose a perfect essay that effectively conveys your point of view to your readers. Worry no more.

Simply follow these 6 tips, and you will be on your way to a perfect persuasive essay.

1. Understand the assignment and audience

Before you start writing your essay, you must understand what type of essay you are being asked to write. Who your target audience should be?

Make sure you know exactly what youâre arguing for and against, as this will help shape your essay's content.

2. Brainstorm and research

Once you understand the topic better, brainstorm ideas that support your argument.

During this process, be sure to do additional research on any unfamiliar points or topics.

3. Create an outline

After doing your initial research, create an outline for your essay that includes all the main points you want to make.

This will help keep your thoughts organized and ensure you cover all the necessary points cohesively.

Check out our extensive guide on persuasive essay outlines to master the art of creating essays.

4. Make an argument

Use persuasive language and techniques to construct your essay. Strong evidence, such as facts and statistics, can also help to strengthen your argument.

5. Edit and revise

Before you submit your essay, take the time to edit and revise it carefully.

This will ensure that your argument is clear and concise and that there are no grammar or spelling errors.

6. Get feedback

Lastly, consider asking someone else to read over your essay before you submit it.

Feedback from another person can help you see any weaknesses in your argument or areas that need improvement.

Summing up,

Writing a persuasive essay about the death penalty doesnât have to be overwhelming. With these examples and tips, you can be sure to write an essay that will impress your teacher.

Whether itâs an essay about the death penalty or any other controversial topic, you can ace it with these steps!

Remember, the key is to be creative and organized in your writing!

Don't have time to write your essay?

Don't stress! Leave it to us! Our persuasive essay writing service is here to help!

Contact the team of experts at our essay writing service. We can help you write a creative, well-organized, and engaging essay for the reader.

Our persuasive essay writer will write the best essay for you at affordable rates! Moreover, we provide free revisions and other exclusive perks!

So don't delay! Ask us to write an essay for me today!

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most persuasive argument for the death penalty.

The most persuasive argument for the death penalty is that it is a deterrent to violent crime.

The idea is that by punishing criminals, other potential criminals will be less likely to act out of fear of similar punishment.

How do you start a persuasive speech on the death penalty?

When starting a persuasive speech on the death penalty, begin by introducing and defining the topic. Provide an overview of the controversial issue.

Outline your points and arguments clearly, including evidence to support your position.

What are good topics for persuasive essays?

Good topics for persuasive essays include

Whether or not the death penalty is a fair punishment for violent crime
Whether harsher punishments will reduce crime rates
Will capital punishment is worth the costs associated with it
How rehabilitation should be taken into consideration when dealing with criminals.

Cathy A. (Marketing, Literature)

For more than five years now, Cathy has been one of our most hardworking authors on the platform. With a Masters degree in mass communication, she knows the ins and outs of professional writing. Clients often leave her glowing reviews for being an amazing writer who takes her work very seriously.

Paper Due? Why Suffer? That’s our Job!

Keep reading

Legal & Policies

Privacy Policy
Cookies Policy
Terms of Use
Refunds & Cancellations
Our Writers
Success Stories
Our Guarantees
Affiliate Program
Referral Program
AI Essay Writer

Disclaimer: All client orders are completed by our team of highly qualified human writers. The essays and papers provided by us are not to be used for submission but rather as learning models only.

Persuasive Essay

Persuasive Essay About Death Penalty

Last updated on: Jan 2, 2024

Crafting a Compelling Persuasive Essay About Death Penalty

By: Donna C.

Reviewed By: Jacklyn H.

Published on: Jan 27, 2023

Writing a persuasive essay about the death penalty can be difficult. You want to make sure that your argument is convincing and well-reasoned.

It's important to get your persuasive essay about death row right because it's a topic that people feel passionately about.

You don't want to risk alienating your readers with a poorly written argument.

We can help you write an excellent persuasive essay about the death penalty. Our experienced writers know how to craft an argument to persuade your readers.

Let’s get started!

On this Page

What is a Persuasive Essay?

A persuasive essay is used to convince a reader about a particular idea or focus that you believe in. Your persuasive essay could be based on anything about which you can make a clear argument.

Whether you're arguing against junk food at school or petitioning for the removal of the death penalty, persuasive skills are essential.

When writing a persuasive essay, you need to think about what kind of evidence can support the death penalty argument.

Depending on your topic, this could include facts and data, examples from real life, or quotes from experts.

You want to convince them that your opinion is the one that matters most. After all, persuasion is at the heart of any successful essay.

So make sure you research and think carefully about presenting your argument!

Take a look at these persuasive essay topics and select the one that interests you the most!

Paper Due? Why Suffer? That's our Job!

Persuasive Essay About Death Penalty Examples

The death penalty is a highly controversial and polarizing topic. It is an issue that has been debated for centuries, with passionate advocates on both sides of the debate.

Unfortunately, there are still many countries in the world that practice capital crimes. This raises some very important ethical and moral questions for society.

One of the best ways to share their opinions is through persuasive essays. You can use the following essay samples as inspiration for writing an essay.

Example of a Persuasive essay about death penalty

Persuasive essay about death penalty in the Philippines

Short Persuasive essay about death penalty

Persuasive essay about death penalty should be abolished

The death penalty pros and cons essay

Argumentative Essay About Death Penalty Examples

In some countries, death penalties are still used as capital punishment to deter crimes.

However, there are also many people who argue that the death penalty should be abolished because it's inhumane.

The easiest way is to convey your thoughts through an argumentative essay. Check out these examples to see how you can structure your arguments.

Argumentative essay about death penalty in the Philippines

Argumentative essay about death penalty with introduction body conclusion

Argumentative essay about death penalty should be abolished

Argumentative essay about death penalty conclusion

Need more samples? Check out these persuasive essay examples !

Tough Essay Due? Hire Tough Writers!

Persuasive Essay Writing Tips

Writing a persuasive essay is all about making sure your opinion is heard. Be sure to create a persuasive essay outline before you start writing!

Here are some tips to help you make your argument convincing.

First, always start with an interesting introduction. Use creative language to capture the reader's attention and introduce the subject of your essay.
Second, back up your opinion with solid evidence. Provide facts, statistics, and quotes from reliable sources that can help strengthen your argument.
Third, make sure your prose is clear and concise. Don’t let long-winded sentences or complex language get in the way of getting your point across.
Finally, create a strong conclusion. Restate your argument and provide a call to action if appropriate. Ensure the reader knows exactly what you want them to do with this essay.

Need help with facts? Check out this video debate about the death penalty.

Time to wrap it up!

Writing a persuasive essay about the death penalty can be difficult, but it's important to get it right.

Since people feel passionate about the issue on both sides of the argument, your argument needs to be convincing.

If you're unsure how to do this, you can use our examples as inspiration.

Are you looking to create a powerful argument that will captivate your readers?

Our experienced writers will work with you to craft an argument to convince your readers.

SharkPapers.com is here to help!

Our essay writing service provides persuasive essays crafted by expert writers backed up with compelling evidence and research.

Our essay writer will create arguments that can make your reader understand and agree with your narrative.

We understand how important it is to ensure your essay is persuasive. As a result, we guarantee high-quality work every time.

Let our persuasive essay writer craft the perfect argument for you today! We guarantee that your writing will be persuasive and effective.

Our persuasive essay writing service can help you create powerful arguments for your essay. Get started today!

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the most persuasive argument for the death penalty.

When it comes to the death penalty, few arguments are as persuasive as this:

"Innocent persons have been put to death before - and it might continue to happen unless we do something about it".

That's why proponents of the death penalty often bring up the concept of "just deserts." This asserts that those guilty of a heinous crime deserve to receive a cruel and unusual punishment.

How do you start a persuasive speech on the death penalty?

You can start a persuasive speech through a hook statement, this will help pique the listeners attention. However, be sure to avoid biasness.

To start, establish why the audience should care about this. Present facts that highlight how unjust form of punishment it is.

What are good topics for persuasive essays?

Here is a list of inspiring persuasive essay topics:

Should people be punished for the crimes committed in rage?
Should unjustly arrested people be sentenced to death without getting the benefit of doubt?
Should government-funded jails in the United States stop considering a death penalty as morally just?
Do the wrongly executed people deserve an eye for an eye?
Is gun control necessary in society today?

Law, Education

Donna writes on a broad range of topics, but she is mostly passionate about social issues, current events, and human-interest stories. She has received high praise for her writing from both colleagues and readers alike. Donna is known in her field for creating content that is not only professional but also captivating.

Was This Blog Helpful?

Keep reading.

How To Write a Persuasive Essay That Wins Over Your Reader

200 Great Persuasive Essay Topics to Help Get You Started

14 Persuasive Essay Examples to Help You Get Started

How to Write a Persuasive Essay Outline: The Ultimate Guide

10+ Persuasive Essay About Gun Control Examples and Topics

Persuasive Essay About Covid-19: 11 Examples that Inspire

Writing a Persuasive Essay about Business: Examples & Tips

Writing a Persuasive Essay about Abortion: Tips and Examples

Persuasive Essay About Online Education Examples to Help You Out

Write a Persuasive Essay About Bullying With Our Examples

Writing Persuasive Essays About Smoking? Use These Samples

Learning From Pros To Write Persuasive Essays About Social Media

Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Contact Us

Your phone no.
Confirm Password
I have read Privacy Policy and agree to the Terms and Conditions .

FORGOT PASSWORD

SEND PASSWORD

Constitutional_court_of_South_Africa.jpeg

Constitutional Court of South Africa

Bringing Back the Death Penalty in South Africa for Crimes Against Women

by Jade Weiner | Oct 1, 2019

About Jade Weiner

Jade Weiner, “Bringing Back the Death Penalty in South Africa for Crimes Against Women”, (OxHRH Blog, October 2019), <https://ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/bringing-back-the-death-penalty-in-south-africa-for-crimes-against-women/>, [Date of access].

September is the start of spring in South Africa, marked by warmer weather and blossoming trees. However, this September was marred by brutal xenophobic attacks and lootings, child abductions and the rape and murder of young, vibrant, beautiful women.

On 12 September, Minister Bheki Cele, released the 2018/19 annual crime statistics revealing an increase in the murder rate to 21,022 and reported sexual offenses to 52,420. The number of murders of women and young girls is especially alarming. In South Africa, one woman is killed every three hours .

Communities of all races, ages and religions have taken to social media and the streets, protesting the status quo with marches, sharing experiences and raising awareness. South Africans are demanding accountability of government agencies, self-defence classes, curfews imposed on men and even the death penalty to combat violent crime.

The public outcry from the tragic events of September and their affirmation in official government statistics sparked over 590,000 South Africans signing a petition calling for the death penalty to be reinstated for crimes against women.

Bringing back the death penalty, despite public demand, is not just a case of instituting a harsher sentence, it is a matter of changing constitutional law. Under the Apartheid regime, convicted criminals could be hanged. After a five year moratorium, the Constitutional Court, under the Interim Constitution , would decide constitutionality on capital punishment.

The drafters of the Constitution neither sanctioned nor excluded the death penalty. The case of S v Makwanyane held firm that the death penalty contravenes the Constitution, violating the right to life, dignity and freedom and security of a person which includes the right not to be treated or punished in a cruel, inhuman or degrading way.

Chaskalson, P held that the death penalty does not only infringe on the dignity of the accused but also on the dignity of all those involved in the process. The application of the death penalty was held to be arbitrary and unequal. Inevitable discrimination would result in the poorest, who would not be able to afford the best defence, being the worst affected. “Only if there is a willingness to protect the worst and the weakest amongst us, that all of us can secure that our own rights will be protected.”

While the majority of the population were in favour of capital punishment, the Court held that “public opinion may have some relevance to the enquiry, but, in itself, it is no substitute for the duty vested in the Courts to interpret the Constitution …” The question to be answered was “not what the majority of South Africans believe … [but] whether the Constitution allows the sentence.”

The rights to life, dignity, freedom and security are subject to the general limitations provision allowing limitation only to the extent reasonable and justifiable in an open democratic society based on freedom and equality. Rights to life and dignity are the most important of all human rights as they form the basis for other rights. Justifications that the death penalty acts as a deterrent, preventative or restitutive measure cannot be accorded same weight. It has not been conclusively proven that the death penalty is a more effective deterrent than alternative punishments.

Makwanyane made clear that the death penalty will not solve violent crimes, it would only institutionalise murder, the destruction of life and annihilation of dignity. Further, for South Africa to reinstate capital punishment would be against the international trend of abolition.

Calling for brutality to end brutality does not address the root cause of the violence. Energies must be directed towards combatting violent crime against women, children and indeed any person in South Africa. We need to transform South Africa into a country in which women, children and men are respected and protected simply because they are human beings, with the law and authorities being resourced and empowered to deal with both perpetrators and victims.

It is hoped that the proactive measures announced by President Ramaphosa on 18 September will help tackle Gender Based Violence. These, coupled with institutional willingness and education at all levels of society, will help to ensure that the constitutional rights and values of life, dignity and freedom are a lived reality.

The Transformative Possibilities of a Constitution (with Joel Modiri and Gautam Bhatia)

Criminal Justice and the Death Penalty in India: An Opinion Study with 60 Former Supreme Court Judges

Federal Judge Strikes Down California Death Penalty as Unconstitutional

The role sanction has, never, been to address the root causes of crime.

The role of sanction is to establish justice, with the desired and, realized effect of a safer society, based upon two things, the holding of criminals and the deterrent effect in stopping some future crimes.

Dignity is something we possess. It is not something conferred upon us by others nor something which can be removed from us by sanction.

Those who have chosen to rape and murder women have abandoned their own dignity, of their own free will, and have decided to destroy the lives of the innocent.

The death penalty cannot take away the dignity of the rapist/murderer, first because he has chosen to abandon it and secondly because an outside force cannot take it away. Can a rapist murderer regain their dignity, Of course, but still, the death penalty cannot take it away anymore than it can with anyone else involved in a death penalty protocol.

Life is no more of an absolute human right than is freedom. Both execution and incarceration can be justified by proportional sanctions, based within justice.

Is there anything more dignified than the pursuit if justice?

Wardens of the state, be they police or military can, justifiably, kill, which does not take away the dignity of the police or soldier or those they killed, as they each posses it, or not, within themselves, just as with the state that may execute within justice.

The question of the death penalty is one of the current questions of debate in Sri Lanka. Your blog raises some important questions. What are the root causes of violence? Are they country specific or worldwide? And how are energies to be directed against crime towards women and children? Crimes against women and children (especially chhildren) are not numerous in Sri Lanka. Another question to which I have not found an answer is this: Has the finding that the death penalty is not an effective deterrent been tested only in developed countries? That is my impression, but I may be wrong. Has it been proved by statistics in South Africa? The general feeling among the population here (over 90% according to one survey) is that it would be an effective deterrent here. Anyway, best wishes for your research at Oxford. Sinha Bsnayake

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Submit Journal Contribution

Author information.

Full name *
Jurisdiction *
Upload author profile photo * Accepted file types: jpg, gif, png, jpeg, bmp, Max. file size: 1 MB.
Author bio *
I’m happy to display my social media links (only complete if you want them displayed)

Journal content

Journal article title *
Upload Journal article * Accepted file types: doc, docx, , Max. file size: 1 MB.
Articles can be uploaded in the following formats: doc, docx
Subscribe to the newsletter
Consent * I agree that the article submitted is my original and unpublished work *

Submit Blog Contribution

Blog content.

Blog title *
Upload blog article * Accepted file types: doc, docx, , Max. file size: 1 MB.
You can upload your blog in the following document formats: doc, docx.
Subscribe me to the newsletter
Consent * I agree that the blog post submitted is my original and unpublished work *

Science & Math
Sociology & Philosophy
Law & Politics

Essay: Arguments against the Death Penalty

Essay: Arguments against the Death…

The idea of putting another human to death is hard to completely fathom. The physical mechanics involved in the act of execution are easy to grasp, but the emotions involved in carrying out a death sentence on another person, regardless of how much they deserve it, is beyond my own understanding. However, this act is sometimes necessary and it is our responsibility as a society to see that it is done. Opponents of capital punishment have basically four arguments.

The first is that there is a possibility of error. However, the chance that there might be an error is separate from the issue of whether the death penalty can be justified or not. If an error does occur, and an innocent person is executed, then the problem lies in the court system, not in the death penalty.

Furthermore, most activities in our world, in which humans are involved, possess a possibility of injury or death. Construction, sports, driving, and air travel all offer the possibility of accidental death even though the highest levels of precautions are taken.

These activities continue to take place and continue to occasionally take human lives, because we have all decided, as a society, that the advantages outweigh the unintended loss. We have also decided that the advantages of having dangerous murderers removed from our society outweigh the losses of the offender.

The second argument against capital punishment is that it is unfair in its administration. Statistics show that the poor and minorities are more likely to receive the death penalty. Once again, this is a separate issue.

It can’t be disputed sadly, the rich are more likely to get off with a lesser sentence, and this bias is wrong. However, this is yet another problem with our current court system. The racial and economic bias is not a valid argument against the death penalty. It is an argument against the courts and their unfair system of sentencing.

The third argument is actually a rebuttal to a claim made by some supporters of the death penalty. The claim is that the threat of capital punishment reduces violent crimes. Opponents of the death penalty do not agree and have a valid argument when they say, “The claims that capital punishment reduces violent crime is inconclusive and certainly not proven.”

The fourth argument is that the length of stay on death row, with its endless appeals, delays, technicalities, and retrials, keep a person waiting for death for years on end. It is both cruel and costly. This is the least credible argument against capital punishment. The main cause of such inefficiencies is the appeals process, which allows capital cases to bounce back and forth between state and federal courts for years on end.

If supporting a death row inmate for the rest their life costs less than putting them to death, and ending their financial burden on society, then the problem lies in the court system, not in the death penalty. As for the additional argument, that making a prisoner wait for years to be executed is cruel, then would not waiting for death in prison for the rest of your life be just as cruel, as in the case of life imprisonment without parole.

Many Americans will tell you why they are in favor of the death penalty. It is what they deserve. It prevents them from ever murdering again. It removes the burden from taxpayers. We all live in a society with the same basic rights and guarantees. We have the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness with equal opportunities.

This is the basis of our society. It is the foundation on which everything else is built upon. When someone willfully and flagrantly attacks this foundation by murdering another, robbing them of all they are, and all they will ever be, then that person can no longer be a part of this society. The only method that completely separates cold blooded murderers from our society is the death penalty.

As the 20th century comes to a close, it is evident that our justice system is in need of reform. This reform will shape the future of our country, and we cannot jump to quick solutions such as the elimination of the death penalty. As of now, the majority of American supports the death penalty as an effective solution of punishment.

“An eye for an eye,” is what some Americans would say concerning the death penalty. Supporters of the death penalty ask the question, “Why should I, an honest hardworking taxpayer, have to pay to support a murderer for the rest of their natural life? Why not execute them and save society the cost of their keep?” Many Americans believe that the death penalty is wrong. However, it seems obvious to some Americans that the death penalty is a just and proper way to handle convicted murderers.

Essay: Against Euthanasia & Robert Latimer Case
Essay Analysis Structure
Death in Hamlet
Essay Against Gun Control
Death Penalty: Two Wrongs Don't Make a Right?

Author: William Anderson (Schoolworkhelper Editorial Team)

10 Comments

The title is Arguments against the Death Penalty yet the author spent the whole time counterclaiming any arguments brought up rather than explaining the logistics behind the arguments. No side was taken in this essay however the title clearly states that the essay should be on arguments against.

Who is the Author?

I agree with y’all the death penalty is wrong because why make them die really quick when you can make them suffer for what they did?

I disagree entirely

I agree with you!

Are you Gonna pay for them to be alive then? We are wasting money that could be spent helping the homeless or retired vetrans.

more money is spent on actually executing prisoners ? so how that makes any sense i dont know?

Whatever henious crime one does,we are not uncivilised and barbaric to take the lives of others.If we ought to give them death sentence as punishment,then what distinguishes us from the criminals?Also I don’t think that giving death sentence would deter the other criminals from doing the same and reduce the number of crimes.If insecurity is the major issue behind demanding capital punishment,then the best solution is framing the punishment in such a way that the culprit would never be a threat to the society,not hanging to death.

what distinguishes us from murderers is that we ONLY kill when necessary, if for example there was a serial killer arrested a death penalty is necessary because 1. if said killer ever breaks out they could kill many more people, and 2. the government is already pouring enough money into the prisons right now. more people means more money needed. money that could go to our military or police.

now there is also (as said above) problems with the current situation in the courts, a rich man will get a great lawyer while a poor man gets the best they can afford, though the reasoning behind the long wait I do understand, it is to reduce the likelihood of an innocent man or woman from being put to death.

by the way we don’t hang people anymore we give them painless deaths

also, in response to your idea of a different punishment to stop a criminal from committing crime again do YOU have any ideas because if you do I please post them. I AM willing to have a actual debate if you are willing to calmly do so.

It’s been proven that it costs more to put a prisoner to death by death penalty than letting them sit in jail for the rest of their life. The death penalty is funded by the taxes we pay to the government. As a taxpayer, i don’t want to spend extra money that i make to put a murdered etc. to death when they could sit in jail for the rest of their life and this is just as much punishment for them. They have time to think about their actions and hopefully get their mind right, get some help, and get right with God or whatever faith they believe in if they do. Some cases may be acceptable for the death penalty, but it should be the absolute worse ones, or if the prisoner breaks out as stated before.

Should The UK Reintroduce The Death Penalty

Categories: Death Penalty United Kingdom

About this sample

Words: 885 |

Published: Jul 17, 2018

Words: 885 | Pages: 2 | 5 min read

Cite this Essay

Let us write you an essay from scratch

450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

Dr. Heisenberg

Verified writer

Expert in: Social Issues Geography & Travel

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

2 pages / 791 words

3 pages / 1282 words

1 pages / 609 words

1 pages / 618 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Should The UK Reintroduce The Death Penalty Essay

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

The death penalty, a contentious and polarizing issue, has been a subject of debate for centuries. It involves the state-sanctioned execution of a person as punishment for a serious crime. While many countries have abolished the [...]

The death of a moth may seem like a trivial event, but Virginia Woolf's essay "The Death of the Moth" suggests otherwise. Through her vivid and poetic language, Woolf portrays the inevitability of death and the fragility of [...]

The death penalty has been a contentious issue in the United States for decades. Advocates argue that it serves as a deterrent for heinous crimes, while opponents highlight the moral and ethical implications of state-sanctioned [...]

The debate over whether executions should be televised has been a topic of discussion for many years. The idea of broadcasting such a graphic and controversial event raises ethical, moral, and legal questions. However, there are [...]

I believe the death penalty should be legal throughout the nation. Discussing the death penalty pros and cons, there are many reasons as to why I think the death penalty should be legalized in all states, including deterrence, [...]

How many times have you been somewhere and heard a teen arguing with their parent saying, “Why are you treating me like such a kid?” We all know teens want to be treated like adults when it comes to responsibilities and [...]

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

Instructions Followed To The Letter
Deadlines Met At Every Stage
Unique And Plagiarism Free

'Why we should consider bringing back the death penalty'

We should give serious consideration to bringing back capital punishment, writes Sam Truelove

14:23, 31 JUL 2019

Stories from court and the latest breaking crime news sent right to your inbox

We have more newsletters

The death penalty is a controversial subject.

Since capital punishment ended in the UK in 1965, some have been glad to see the back of it, while others have called for it to be reinstated.

While more than most oppose the death penalty, I'm actually all for it.

It's important to note that I would only be comfortable in imposing such a sentence on the criminals who have committed the most evilest of crimes, for example serial killers.

I understand taking a person's life shouldn't be a decision taken lightly, and many will oppose it all together. But does a serial killer - like Peter Bryan who murdered three people in London and ate their brains - deserve to be given a second chance? Does he deserve to live when three families have been traumatised and hurt in such a way their lives will never be the same again?

My opinion is no.

I have the same view on Levi Bellfield, who brutally murdered three young women in West London, and Anthony Hardy - dubbed the Camden Ripper - who killed three women before using an electric saw to cut up their bodies and dumping them in bins near his home.

These are serial killers - people who didn't hesitate when it came to killing another human being. So why should we flinch in taking theirs?

The death penalty is also topical at the moment after Prime Minister Boris Johnson was forced to deny he'll bring back hanging on his first full day in office.

The new PM was hit with questions over his Government's policy on capital punishment after he appointed Priti Patel to Secretary of State for the Home Department. Ms Patel has previously been a vocal supporter of the return of capital punishment, arguing it would act as a "deterrent".

And last year, Lincolnshire MP John Hayes urged the Government to think about re-introducing the death penalty to combat violent crime.

At the time, the Government poured cold water on the request, saying it opposes the death penalty around the world and has no plans to reintroduce it. But Mr Hayes told Lincolnshire Live that he believes the country should give the matter further consideration.

He said: "We have got an issue in Britain with very serious crime. We have had a number of serious crimes, the murder rates increases and barely a week goes by without hearing about some horrific child murder or old people being attacked and killed.

"Many of my constituents say that's partly because we don't respond appropriately. It seems to me there really needs to be a fitting punishment."

He added: "I say capital punishment should be a sentence available to the courts but the death penalty should not be mandatory - that's always been my position.

"If you look at the Westminster Bridge attacker, he was shot in cold-blood after someone had taken a proper decision to stop him.

"If he had survived I think most of the British public would have been OK if he had received a fair trial and been hanged - most people would deem that appropriate."

Westminster Bridge attacker Khalid Masood, who killed five people in the 2017 attack, was shot dead by armed officers after mowing down pedestrians and fatally stabbing PC Keith Palmer.

With crime in London, and the rest of the country, seemingly getting worse than getting better, it's hard to disagree with My Hayes.

In my view we should give serious consideration to bringing back the death penalty. Yes it will be controversial. Yes there will be considerable opposition. But it's a sentence which, I think, is needed now more than ever.

Today's most read stories on MyLondon

Police were called to an incident on the London Underground

Why was capital punishment abolished?

Peter Allen and Gwynne Evans were the last people hanged in the UK. They were executed in 1964 for the murder of John West at his home in Seaton, Cumberland.

Capital punishment for murder was abolished in the UK in 1965 following the executions of people who were later proved to have been innocent.

Timothy Evans was famously wrongly convicted and hanged in 1950 for killing his wife and infant daughter at 10 Rillington Place in London.

Three years later John Christie was exposed as a serial killer and confessed to Mrs Evans' murder before he was executed.

People could also be hanged for committing the offence of high treason.

The last person executed for treason in the UK was William Joyce in 1946. He was a Nazi sympathiser who as 'Lord Haw-Haw' broadcast propaganda during the Second World War.

The maximum sentence for treason in the UK is now life imprisonment as set out in the Crime and Disorder Act 1998.

Follow reporter Sam Truelove on social media

Do you have a story? You can get in touch, in complete confidence if necessary, below:

Follow Sam, or drop him a direct message, on Twitter here .

Follow his Facebook page here.

You can read more of his stories here .

Email him on [email protected].

Keep up to date with the latest breaking news here .

Like the MyLondon Facebook page and follow MyLondon on Twitter

Want more news? Go to our homepage.

Got a story? Email [email protected].

Most Recent

Death Penalty – Should it be brought back Essay Example

Pages: 4 (966 words)
Published: August 4, 2016
Type: Essay

The death penalty has been used throughout history; it has evolved from being stoned to death, to being hanged and finally being injected with 3 substances that will kill the victim without pain. Many ideas have developed over the years on how to take a criminal’s life and the lethal injection seems to be the most humane method but the fact that the death penalty has been abolished altogether in Britain is in my opinion appalling.

Criminals all over the UK are committing atrocities constantly and getting away with minimal jail sentences and it’s an outrage; murders, rapes, kidnapping and a manner of other serious crimes and I think it’s about time Britain consider bringing the death penalty back. Another obvious reason why the death sentence should be brought bac

k is that in Britain it costs over ?

23,000 to keep a prisoner in jail for life but don’t you think this money could be put to better use? Instead of feeding and sheltering these criminals who frankly don’t deserve it, why isn’t this money being put to better things? This money could be used for; Medical research, it could buy soldiers, nurses, doctors; it could be used to fund homeless shelters as well. Do you think a murderer deserves 3 meals a day while people are stuck without food, water or shelter?

Moreover, people who are sentenced to death usually committed 1st degree murder to end up on death row awaiting the lethal injection but in Britain people can be let out after as little as 15 years with the chance that they will commit atrocities again on th

public, if the death penalty was brought back to Britain then it would stop these people getting back out onto the streets and making us all unsafe, the streets would be safe to walk, people could feel safe and the country would generally just be a better place and that’s why the death penalty should be brought back especially with the increase in prison overcrowding.

Evidently prison overcrowding is becoming an increasing issue in this country; overcrowding and reoffending rates are just a fact of life in modern day Britain despite the opening of two new prisons with 2,500 available cells. Even with those new prisons opening up this year, 59% of prisons in England and Wales are working at an overcrowded level. There are 7,294 more people in the prison system than there should be at the moment and some of these people are; murderers, rapists, child molesters, kidnappers and many more.

In mine and 56% of the world’s opinion the death penalty should be brought back for the people who deserve it. The bible states that “an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth” is a fair system and this is a familiar saying around the death penalty subject; this is where people believe that if you take someone’s life, you should have your life taken from you.

The death penalty has been given to some who kill just for a few dollars and the “eye for an eye” situation around cases like this is the most obvious. In the United States of America there was a case not long ago where a man broke into someone’s

house and beat them to death with a metal baseball bat in the hope to obtain some money but instead he only got something around $20 from the poor woman’s purse, pointless isn’t it? Taking a life for something as little as $20 it makes no sense.

In Britain people are robbed and killed in a similar situation but the perpetrator of the crime will receive life in jail which is not always what it seems, the prisoner can sometimes receive parole, which is the provisional release of a prisoner in which they agree to certain circumstances e. g. an electric tag but for taking a life this punishment is not enough. In addition to an “eye for an eye”, the death penalty also provides a sense of closure to the victim’s family and friends, they now know that whoever took their friend or loved one’s life has been dealt justice.

The victim’s family and friends might not be over the whole situation completely yet but at least they know that the murderer can’t get out to harm anymore loved ones or anyone else at all for the matter.

Lastly, the death penalty is the best answer to murder; if someone has taken a life for no reason then they have basically given up their human right to live themselves and in my opinion, murderers get off easy with the lethal injection because they simply drift into sleep and that’s it but they will never know the pain their victim or victims felt when they were killed in cold blood. The punishment fits the crime in this situation; wouldn’t you feel safer if

these kinds of people were no longer with us instead of being out on the street with the rest of the public, not feeling worried, not feeling scared, not feeling that your life is in danger. In conclusion the death penalty needs to be brought back to Britain because; I want the country to be safe, I don’t want people to worry about killers on the streets and I want a safer country in general.

The death penalty has been abolished for far too long and it’s needed back to deal with certain kinds of people in this country. Justice needs to be dealt to the killers, rapists, child molesters and kidnappers of this country and the death penalty will see to that, everyone will be safe, no one will need to worry and it would make the country a safer place.

14 Days in May' - A Biased Report Essay Example
The Death Penalty Is An Essay Example
death penalty Essay Example
How the Death Penalty Sets an Example Essay Example
Is the Death Penalty a Deterrent to Crime? Essay Example
The Death Penalty Analysis Essay Example
Death Penalty and Morality Essay Example
Death Penalty in Philippines Essay Example
Death Penalty and Deterrence Essay Example
The Study on Abolishment of Death Penalty of Corruption Crimes Essay Example
Executions at Tyburn in 18th Century Britain Essay Example
The Rationale of Death Penalty Essay Example
Death Penalty of U Essay Example
Two Fishermen Literary Paragraph Essay Example
Capital punishment Narrative Essay Example
Death Penalty Pros And Cons essays
Is The Death Penalty Effective essays
Kill essays
Commitment essays
Affirmative Action essays
Assisted Suicide essays
Capital Punishment essays
Censorship essays
Child Labour essays
Child Protection essays
Civil Rights essays
Corporal Punishment essays
Death Penalty essays
Empowerment essays
Euthanasia essays
Gay Marriage essays
Gun Control essays
Human Trafficking essays
Police Brutality essays
Privacy essays
Sex Trafficking essays
Speech essays
Animal Cruelty essays
Charles Manson essays
Crime Prevention essays
Crime scene essays
Criminal Justice essays
Criminology essays
Cyber Crime essays
Damages essays
Detention essays
Distracted Driving essays
Drug Trafficking essays
Drunk Driving essays
Forensic Science essays
Gang essays
Hate Crime essays
Homicide essays
Identity Theft essays
Juvenile Crime essays
Juvenile Delinquency essays
Juvenile Justice System essays
Law Enforcement essays
Murder essays
Organized Crime essays
Penology essays
Piracy essays
Prison essays
Property Crime essays
Prostitution essays

Haven't found what you were looking for?

Search for samples, answers to your questions and flashcards.

Enter your topic/question
Receive an explanation
Ask one question at a time
Enter a specific assignment topic
Aim at least 500 characters
a topic sentence that states the main or controlling idea
supporting sentences to explain and develop the point you’re making
evidence from your reading or an example from the subject area that supports your point
analysis of the implication/significance/impact of the evidence finished off with a critical conclusion you have drawn from the evidence.

Unfortunately copying the content is not possible

Tell us your email address and we’ll send this sample there..

By continuing, you agree to our Terms and Conditions .

Should Canada bring back the death penalty?

You can save this article by registering for free here . Or sign-in if you have an account.

Article content

Last week, letters editor Paul Russell asked if it was time to bring back capital punishment. A majority of respondents said “yes.” Here are some of the letters (limited to 75 words or less) we received.

Death penalty is not vengeful, just fair

— My 24-year-old daughter Kelly-Anne was murdered by her boyfriend in 2004. He was a controlling, angry person. I will be at his parole hearing in about six years to see if he has changed. He was convicted of second-degree murder, and I would like to see him kept in prison for the rest of his life. Capital punishment, for sure. John Drummond, Montreal. — Some people say the state shouldn’t kill, hence their ideological abhorrence to the death penalty. Makes no sense when you think of a soldier’s job. Tori Stafford was just the latest victim of cruelty, thrust on her by the dregs of human wreckage. Like any dregs, such depraved individuals are good for nothing but compost, if that. Unhooded, disgust and contempt in my eyes, I’d be happy to put the noose around their necks and pull the trapdoor. Lorne Peasland, Victoria. — Canada should have an automatic death penalty for people convicted of two separate, first-degree murders. This would allow us to execute the likes of Paul Bernardo and Clifford Olson, and avoid executing the wrongfully convicted, as no person will ever be wrongfully convicted of two first degree murders that are separated by a reasonable amount of time or space. Jeffrey W. Tighe, Toronto. — A criminal should not be allowed to enjoy a better quality lifestyle than the victim. And in the case of first0degree murder, even life in prison presupposes a better lifestyle than that of the deceased and, thus, the criminal’s death is logical. Not immoral, barbaric or vengeful, just fair. Juan C. Joffre, Calgary. — Bringing back the death penalty is necessary. It is an important deterrent to very serious offences. The death penalty is necessary but can be only used for very serious offences and in the most prudent way. Chris Qiu, Vaughan, Ont. — Capital punishment is necessary in extreme cases especially involving children. The despicable murder of Tori Stafford even moved me, a former hard-nosed cop. I would consent to abolishing the death penalty but only if a life sentence meant life — which will never happen. Steve Flanagan, Ottawa. — A policeman confronts an armed bank-robber and, in self-defence, shoots him. Justified. At another bank, an armed robber kills a policeman and when he is tried, he gets away with his life, even though he committed a capital crime. I know where I stand, even if you replace “policeman” with “civilian.” Jack Dixon, Victoria. — As a physician, it goes against all I believe in to endorse taking a human life. As a mother, however, I would have no trouble pulling the lever on the hangman’s trap door if anyone did to my sons what happened to Tori Stafford or Kirsten French or the victims of Russell Williams. The people who do these types of crime are not fixable — they need to be humanely “put down” for the good of society. Dr. Susan Piccinin, Ancaster, Ont. — The death penalty for certain crimes? Yes. And let’s have those put to death then donate their organs for transplant. Charles Davidson, Toronto. — The main purpose of the death penalty is not justice, or retribution or deterrence — it is protection of society. It is about making sure that the killer does not kill again. Pavel Sorokin, Vancouver. — Our permissive society has created an environment of violence and fear, marked by teenage rioting, sexual predation and brutal killings. Bringing back the death penalty for serial killers and those who kill women and children is the right thing to do. Ron Fawcett, Toronto. — We need capital punishment for criminals such as Paul Bernardo. The coldness that these people exhibit while they are on the stand and looking into the faces of the family members of their victims shows the lack of regret for their crimes. Josh Cranney, Courtice, Ont. — Having no morals, human predators will eventually kill, so society must eliminate them. Jail serves no useful purpose as rehab does not work, the costs are not warranted. Let’s have another debate about capital punishment and vote for “Tori’s Law.” Charles Steele, Vineland, Ont. — We should enact a Young Victims Act and include a provision for state execution, when a person under a specified age is raped or murdered. Executing psychopaths who prey on our defenceless young would be a catharsis for many of us. Frann Harris, Richmond Hill, Ont. — Why should society be burdened with keeping Paul Bernardo or Clifford Olsen incarcerated at a cost of 100k a year (or whatever), for the next 30 or 40 years? Not only would execution save taxpayers’ money, it would free up room in prison for other felons. Harry Koza, Richmond Hill, Ont. — In 1975, Alan Craig MacDonald murdered a Nova Scotia police officer and the taxi driver who witnessed the murder. MacDonald was convicted of both crimes, however after serving only 12 years of what was supposed to be a life sentence, he was released on parole. Six months later, he brutally murdered 21 year-old university student Lynda Shaw. If Macdonald was executed for his original crimes, Shaw would still be alive today. Lee Hanlon, Mission, B.C. — A person who commits murder, such as in the Tori Stafford case, has automatically cancelled his/her right to continue to live in a civilized society — and should be removed. Hank Bangild, Port Colborne, Ont.

Enjoy the latest local, national and international news.

Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay, Rex Murphy and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events.
Unlimited online access to National Post and 15 news sites with one account.
National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on.
Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword.
Support local journalism.

Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience.

Access articles from across Canada with one account.
Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
Enjoy additional articles per month.
Get email updates from your favourite authors.

Don't have an account? Create Account

No, as two wrongs do not make a right

— A government that has a hard time delivering the mail and other basic public services cannot be trusted to make decisions pertaining to the taking of a citizen’s life. The names Truscott, Marshall or Milgaard stand testament to this simple truth. Bryan Moir, Vaughan, Ont. — Capital punishment is not a deterrent and is not cost-effective. If the debate reaches Parliament, it will be another sorry manifestation of emotional decision-making. Revenge is like an orgasm: brief, intense, addictive. Tyrone Streete, Toronto. — Once someone dies, their soul is freed to be born again. Therefore, giving the death penalty to even the most-depraved of murderers is still the wrong thing to do. These defective examples of humanity should be locked up securely for as long as possible. Norbert Kaysser, Port Coquitlam, B.C. — The state does not have any business killing its citizens. A lifetime of incarceration is a suitable living hell. A story comes to mind, told by Pierre Berton during the abolition debate. A foreign sailor was shipwrecked on the English coast and managed to swim ashore, where he spied a small village with a gallows outside the jailhouse. “Thank God!,” he exclaimed. “I have landed in a Christian country.” Sigmund Roseth, Mississauga, Ont. — The death penalty should not be reinstated in Canada — two wrongs do not make a right. Murder rates in the U.S. are much higher in states that have capital punishment. Let’s look for the root causes of crime. Andy Johnson, Little Britain, Ont. — The death penalty is society’s revenge to try to remove the guilt of failure — the failure to value the gift of life, the failure to respect the value of others, the failure of fellow humans to be a human. Keep in mind the Japanese proverb: Before you embark on a journey of revenge, dig two graves. Where do we dig and when do we stop? Dennis McMillan, Victoria. — Man’s propensity for error, whether in law, medicine, economics, politics, etc., is legion. We should be sufficiently humble to acknowledge our fallibilities and not allow for another source of error by revisiting capital punishment. Morton Doran, Fairmont, B.C. — The death penalty will never ever be resurrected. Only the highly strung will get all knotted up abut it. So shut all the traps and put the gallows where they belong: in the museum depicting a long-gone era when men did not know better and women had no say anyway. Jerome Henen, North Vancouver. z Guy Paul Morin, David Milgaard, Steven Truscott, many people convicted on Dr. Charles Smith’s erroneous evidence, the poor schmuck hanged for D’Arcy McGee’s murder, the people hanged for the 1837 rebellion for which the instigator was later lauded. Like everybody else, I wish ill to murderers. But I do not want one innocent person ever to be killed by us. Margie Watson, Toronto. — I am disgusted by my blood thirsty, vengeance-seeking fellow citizens. Most jurisdictions have turned away from this barbaric practice. If people want to kill someone so badly, the penalty should only be applied in name of those so quick to call for death. Not in my name or my children’s or the rest of this once sane and reasonable country. Bruce Van Dieten, Toronto. — Gandalf said it best in Lord of the Rings: “Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgment.” The death penalty might not always be wrong in itself, but it’s always above our pay grade as finite human beings. Richard Dunstan, Nanaimo, B.C. — Two wrongs do not make a right. Doris Garner, Calgary.

What would God say?

— All life is sacred. Criminals are humans who, despite their crime, deserve to be treated with respect and dignity. God’s mission is to bring salvation to all men and women. His salvation is not imposed but reaches us through acts of love, mercy and forgiveness that we can carry out. Paul Kokoski, Hamilton, Ont. — In direct rebuttal to those who say we can’t afford the death penalty — we can’t afford to continue warehousing murderers. As God almighty commanded. Gen. 9:6: “Whoso sheddeth man’s blood, by man shall his blood be shed.” So let’s bring back the noose already. Vaughn McMillan, Calgary. — The execution of the truly guilty murderer does not show disregard to the sanctity of life and justice and disobedience to the word of God. “He [the government] is God’s servant to do you good.” But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword for nothing. The word “sword” refers to capital punishment. John Stefan Obeda, London, Ont. — Yea and amen to the return of the death penalty. It will prove that we do have respect for human life. As the Bible notes: “The murderer shall surely be put to death” and speaking of the government: “A revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil.” Gwen Woods, Mission, B.C. — The Bible states “an eye for an eye.” This ancient simple rule seems to be lost on today’s judicial system. Let’s get the death penalty back on the books where it belongs and justice will be served once again. Ian Cuthbert, Oakville, Ont.

This newsletter tackles hot topics with boldness, verve and wit. (Subscriber-exclusive edition on Fridays)

There was an error, please provide a valid email address.

By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc.

A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.

The next issue of Platformed will soon be in your inbox.

We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again

Explore other options

— I think the death penalty is too merciful. I would much prefer that, while in jail and at regular intervals, a degree of pain should be inflicted upon the guilty party in equal measure to that inflicted upon the victim. In addition, the ridiculous “possibility of parole in 25 years” should be taken off the books. Robert G. McLachlan, St. Catharines, Ont. — Paul Bernardo, Cody Legebokoff, Robert Pickton and Russell Williams are all living very well at our expense in our penal system. Maybe hanging, shooting or drugging them to death is a bit brutal. So a possible solution is an isolated penal colony for this “filth,” similar to rotting in hell. Douglas Maclean, Canmore, Alta. — Although I have no objection to the death penalty for child and cop killers and terrorists, it seems to me that a better solution would be to have them work for the state for the rest of their lives to repay society for their misdeeds. Mining slaves would be a good occupation for them. Jonathan Usher, Toronto. — We should bring the death penalty back but not use it. Bringing it back allows retributionists to say, ‘We’re tough on crime.” And not applying it allows the more-enlightened-than-thou crowd to say “Yes, we could, but we don’t aren’t we just so darned morally superior.” This should keep both sides quiet for another 10 years, then we can start the whole debate all over again. Or not. David Stretton, Maple Ridge, B.C. — If a man is convicted of rape and murder of a child, he should have two choices — capital punishment or castration and imprisonment. M.F. Stephenson, Toronto. — Never mind the death penalty — what’s needed is a “life penalty,” making life sentences truly mean life. Serial killers should also be given consecutive rather than concurrent sentences. In Clifford Olson’s case, that would have amounted to 275 years for his 11 murders without the possibility of endless parole hearings every two years after the first 25 years. E.W. Bopp, Tsawwassen, B.C. — We should not endorse capital punishment. Castration should be legalized as a cure anda deterrent for sexual deviants. Women have said this for years. Val leMaitre, Vancouver.

Unfortunately, there was not room in Monday’s paper for the following letters:

When we allow murderers such as Paul Bernardo to continue their lives even incarcerated, we devalue the lives of our murdered children. We must say that our children’s lives, when taken, are worth more than what we now allow to their murderers. We should have the strength of of our convictions and put these murderers to death. It is not revenge. It is a question of the value and the validation of the child’s life. Janey Crowe, Surrey, B.C

Of course we should bring back the death penalty. Of course we should reverse the foolhardy decision by Pierre Trudeau and the hug a thug milk-sops , to abolish the death penalty for murder. Of course we should focus our compassion on victims’ rights , rather than criminals’ rights and wrongs. When it is beyond a reasonable doubt , (DNA etc.) “hang-em high! Gord Kinnon, Alliston, Ont.

What is the sentence for the family of a murder victim? For an attempted murder victim? For a victim of rape, sexual abuse or incest? Life. Those who perpetrate horrendous crimes against the innocent, thus robbing them of their lives, should pay with their own. The death penalty is neither an issue of revenge nor vengeance: It is ensuring the protection of law-abiding citizens from those who have made the choice to inflict harm. Katherine Bédard, Gloucester, Ont.

It’s high time to ask the death-penalty crybabies which is the most cruellest punishment: to die in your sleep (lethal injection) or spend 25 years behind a 20-foot wall and surrounded with sex-hungry criminals ready to rape you, humiliate you? I would prefer to die in my sleep. Ed Jurick, Montreal.

Grey is a great colour for suits; capital punishment is black and white as in black skirt and a white blouse. To ameliorate the mental, lifelong suffering of the next of kin of the victim(s); mental misfits like the Paul Bernardo and Russell Williams should be taken out of society so they can never be given the slightest chance of repeating their horrific deeds. Christiaan Jansen, Mississauga, Ont.

Those that have complete and total disregard for human life, those that would ignore the sanctity of another humans existence – relinquish their right to exist. Those that would ignore the pleading of a human being before them and continue in their dastardly deed in extinguishing the life of another do not deserve society’s compassion. Compassion needs to be reserved for the victims. Wade Pearson, Calgary.

Murder is an attack on our society, so the only appropriate response is the death penalty. Those who argue that this penalty will not deter a murderer are quite correct, in fact no punishment will act as a deterrent. The death penalty is just and final. K. Pedder, Oakville, Ont.

I’ll take the yes side in reinstating the death penalty because I don’t believe in using millions of taxpayer dollars to support people who would heinously prey on the most vunerable in society, especially children. Guilt would have to be established beyond all doubt. We wouldn’t want a return to the days of stringing a suspected horse thief up to the nearest tree. Jim Corder, Nanaimo, B.C.

Canadians have been regarded around the world as a polite, non-assuming, hardworking and basically honest people. These virtues, until the middle of the last century, were underpinned with tough laws strictly enforced. In 1891 the theft of a hat and coat generated a one-year sentence of hard labour for a young first offender and capitol punishment didn’t end till 1962. Certainly, humane changes to rigid laws were justified, but the proliferation of lawyers and liberal do-gooders has produced in Canada a relaxed money-generated system which now favours the guilty at the expense of the victim. Betty L. Reade, Oakville, Ont.

Consistently, Canadians have polled for the death penalty, for irrefutably guilty murderers who are deemed permanently dangerous to the public. Being so identified is the best reason for execution, no possibility of a repeat murder. Naïve objections that escape or parole won’t happen need to be reminded that it has happened often and can again. Sappy parole boards, terrorists, gangsters, and corrupt conspirators do exist and if incarceration is incompetent, justice has vanished. Peter M. Maclean, Kingston, Ont.

It’s high time to bring back the death penalty. The our constitution is too lenient and merciful for murderers and killers. If any person is convicted of murder charges I as a tax payer see no reason as to why my hard earned money be spent on such rogues. Such convicted criminals should not be eligible for human rights. If these convicts do not care for others why should community and government care for them? Firoz Khan, Toronto.

Yes. The death penalty is not revenge, it is the only fitting punishment for pre-meditated murder, serial killing, raping and killing a child, killing a police officer, etc. The case of Clifford Olsen was particularly disturbing, as he was able to torment the families of his victims from prison for years. The death penalty would have prevented this and would have brought final closure to the families of the victims. Renate Roy, Toronto.

The answer is a resounding YES for all cases where the crime has been deliberate and planned; also in cases where there has been no premeditation but there has existed deliberation ,i.e. the defendant has used force or means that plain common sense identifies them as dead-causing. All of this, of course, subject to the perpetrator having been proved guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The individual who wantonly takes someone´s life, automatically forfeits the right to his or her own. This principle, if applied, makes citizens feel protected because legal retribution conveys a sense of fairness since the State values their lives. Luis J. Gómez, Montreal.

For heinous crimes that are proven beyond a shadow of a doubt, Capital Punishment should be reinstated. A jury today examining the facts judiciously, coupled with modern technology would / could determine guilt / innocence. All politicians should stop believing that they are protecting Canadians from themselves. Parliamentarians should listen to their constituents, set aside their political expediency to reinstate the Death Penalty, Peter K Marchant, Pickering, Ont.

There is one and only one good reason for the death penalty. The murderer executed is absolutely, definitely deterred from being able to kill again. Six percent of murderers kill again. Many innocent lives would be saved, children, pensioners and even prisoners in jail. Stephen Ottridge, Vancouver.

The death penalty for deliberate murder is morally acceptable and I think all reasonable practical objections to its use can be met satisfactorily. But, I don’t think capital punishment is morally required and I know that a large minority of my fellow Canadians find it morally repugnant. It will alienate the minority from their own community if the majority rules on this one. We best agree on a suitable alternative punishment. G.G. Brown, Waterloo, ON

Absolutely , when things have reached the point where : even the accused has boldly admitted having murdered , IT IS time we realized that the opposite of RIGHT is being done by catering to these animals , by keeping them alive in a dysfunctional correctional system. Brian Kinnon,Alliston, Ont.

I am “pro-choice” on execution, convinced that a state should retain this option for dealing with the worst types of indubitably guilty criminals. Canada’s “pro-life” policy on extraditing foreign murderers who flee here often obstructs justice. And many who oppose execution regardless of circumstances seem to lack empathy for the families of murder victims, while failing to recognize that some imprisoned, hardened killers manage to murder and traumatize again.

Dan Sonnenschein, Vancouver,

The death penalty will save the public, the expense of taking care of the twisted evil doers, for the next 25 years. It will eliminate some of the pain & suffering of family and friends, by removing the perpatrators from this world it will lessen some of the constant reminders & constant torment, that the guilty parties very existence causes. D. McColl, Hamilton, Ont.

Truly guilty murderers should be executed, provided they understood what they did. The first woman executed by the U.S. government was Mary Surratt. I was inspired to write a book about her controversial hanging and the Lincoln assassination plot by Canada’s best-selling author of all time, Charles Chiniquy, Abraham Lincoln’s extremely close friend, who wrote of her trial and execution. Paul Serup, Prince George, B.C.

I am in favour of capital punishment. Having been a police officer for 36 years and having seen too much of the handiwork of Canadian criminals, I believe those having committed first degree murder should be executed. Those found guilty would have ten years and no more to exhaust their appeals and this would give time for any evidence, even incontrovertible DNA evidence, to be presented to clear them. The recidivism would be zero. Gary Godwin, Prince George, B.C.

In this debate I turn to the words of J.R.R. Tolkien: “Many that live deserve death. And some die that deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then be not too eager to deal out death in the name of justice, fearing for your own safety. Even the wise cannot see all ends.” Alex Banks, Toronto.

Those who oppose the death penalty on the grounds that innocent people might be executed, are overlooking the fact that since it was abolished, over 800 innocent people have died at the hands of killers who were released, escaped or paroled. It may not be a deterrent, but its an effective preventive measure. Woody Woodrow, Kelowna. B.C.

Yes. Against those in power who egregiously abuse their position and thereby undermine the public’ trust in the authorities. Say, a police chief also turns out to be working for organized crime. Or cops covering up crime by other police such as hiding the video evidence in the Robert Dziekanski case. Or a spy chief passing info to the enemy. Vilmos Soti, North Vancouver, B.C.

I have always been in favour of the death penalty. I strongly believe that there would be less crime because, not only would we get rid of repeat offenders, but it would also scare other criminals from committing future acts, knowing they could lose their life. Furthermore, tax money now being used to support prisoners for many years behind bars could instead be allocated to much better causes in our society, such as environment, health and education. Monica Cowan, Calgary.

Reintroducing capital punishment to Canada represents a step backwards for our legal system. Condemning a criminal to death row has proven to be an inaccurate science, where the validity of the conviction is never absolute. In addition to being an expensive alternative to incarceration, it fails to act as a sustainable mechanism to deter future criminal activity. More attention and correctional resources should be devoted to the rehabilitation of criminals, instead of towards their death. Roger Hilton, Montreal.

The sadistic treatment meted out to Tori Stafford is the reason for the death penalty debate. If it were brought back, I shudder to contemplate the fate of the innocent people who were found guilty by bogus evidence of pathologist Dr. Charles Smith. Elwan Lobo-Pires, Mississauga, Ont.

The death penalty should not be reinstated. Mot only is it unethical but the cost is ridiculous. A lengthy and expensive series of trials would be necessary for each case to ensure the verdict of guilty is definite, on top of the cost to actually administer the execution. Sid Kelly, Bowmanville, Ont.

The moral argument for capital punishment is simple: If you take another’s life you forfeit your own. The legal argument is more difficult because juries make mistakes as do judges. Witnesses lie and then recant. Police fabricate evidence. I do not wish to live in a country where the state has the legal right to execute its citizens. It is better that the prison system is full than one innocent person be put to death. Keith Brady, Empress, Alta.

While the execution of monsters may satisfy a certain segment of society, such a solution is short-sighted since those who are dead are beyond suffering. Better they be kept alive, but in conditions so unspeakably abysmal that even Papillon would be aghast. Let the monsters live, but ensure that they rot for a very long time to come. No to the death penalty; death is too easy an escape. Mark Lavoie, Toronto.

Capital Punishment must never be reinstated. Apart from the injunction “Thou shalt not kill”, there is always a risk of putting to death an innocent person. What if 14-year-old Stephen Truscott had been hanged after that travesty of a trial, according to the sentence laid down by the presiding judge? There have been too many examples of executing innocent persons. Whatever the cost, incarceration for life is our only choice. Mary McKim, London, Ont.

While I’m agnostic about the whole capital punishment issue, I have relatives who make some fair points. One says we need it because some people just don’t learn without it. Another wonders why, if capital punishment is not needed, we still need the term ‘repeat offender’. Grant A. Brown, Edmonton.

I totally disagree with the retrograde step of re-introducing the death penalty. What I strongly feel should be considered is making the life sentence of 25 years a true life sentence for certain crimes that are so horrendous as to turn ones stomach just reading about them. These people should never be allowed to walk the streets again. Ann Meiring, Calgary.

The death penalty does prevent repeat crimes but unfortunately does not prevent the injustice of executing the person who is not guilty.We have had several prominent examples of people wrongfully imprisoned for capital offenses who were later proven innocent. Particularly heinous crimes should instead lead to life imprisonment without parole and mean exactly that — imprisonment until death . Leigh U. Smith, Burnaby, B.C.

It is time to bring back the death penalty for brutal murderers like the ones who killed Tori Stafford. We should ask ourselves if people like Clifford Olson or Paul Bernardo deserve to live at our expense. Chuck Spencer, Bayfield, Ont.

Today you can’t go outside for a walk without being afraid that someone will pull you into the bushes mug, rape and even kill you. And it is worse when this happens to innocent little children. Why should the lowest scum on Earth get away with this? Rosi Bisaro, Hamilton, Ont.

Canada should have never stop doing capital punishment. Having no deterrent to replace it was just naive. Simha S. Mendelsohn, Toronto.

It’s time to bring back the death penalty for kidnappers, killers and rapists, especially for crimes involving young girls and boys. War and self defence are legitimate excuses for the taking of human life and it should be, also, for murderers, who fiendishly kill our most vulnerable. Patrick Rosati, Montreal.

The death penalty is an effective crime deterrent in many instances, especially with crimes where the guilty has shown he is beyond any redemptive potential and needs to be put out of his own misery. The ideals of rehabilitation and recovery have serious limitations. Cyril Abraham, Whitby, Ont.

The Harper government should hold a national referendum on capital punishment as soon as possible, as it is the proper punishment for perpetrators of terrible crimes, such as what happened to Tori Stafford.

Merle Terlesky, Calgary.

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion. Please keep comments relevant and respectful. Comments may take up to an hour to appear on the site. You will receive an email if there is a reply to your comment, an update to a thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information.

Ontario resident who wants both a vagina and penis wins public funding for unique surgery

Alberta first nation entitled to 420 square kilometres of additional territory from treaty: supreme court, first reading: jagmeet singh is canada's most expensive mp, pierre poilievre is the cheapest, trudeau says he doesn’t understand why ndp is 'pulling back' support for carbon tax, csis director testifies trudeau government was warned repeatedly about chinese foreign interference, lululemon has a new bag and it’s trending.

The Parent Backpack is water-repellent, ultra-organized and not just for families

Beauty Buzz: Biotherm Blue Peptides Uplift Firming Day Cream, Virtue Hydrating Healing Hair Oil, and Dr. Hauschka Regenerating Intensive Eye Serum

Beauty Buzz: Three buzzed-about beauty products we tried this week

Advertisement 2 Story continues below This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

How to clean and season cast iron pans

A step-by-step guide on the best way to take care of your pan so it lasts for generations (because it really can)

The best online deals in the Canadian retail space right now

Casper, Shopbop, Best Buy and Sephora, to name a few

5 spring sunglasses guaranteed to elevate your eyewear game

Trends! Colours! Shapes! Price points!

This website uses cookies to personalize your content (including ads), and allows us to analyze our traffic. Read more about cookies here . By continuing to use our site, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy .

You've reached the 20 article limit.

You can manage saved articles in your account.

and save up to 100 articles!

Looks like you've reached your saved article limit!

You can manage your saved articles in your account and clicking the X located at the bottom right of the article.

Username or Email Address

Remember Me

Exploring the Death Penalty in the Philippines Essay

Is the death penalty truly an effective deterrent to crime? And what are the ramifications of its application in the Philippines ? Join us as we delve into the controversial topic of capital punishment in the Philippines , examining its history, legal implications, and impact on human rights.

The Philippines made history in 1987 when it became the first Asian country in modern times to abolish the death penalty for all crimes. However, in 1993, it was reintroduced for “heinous” crimes due to public fear and frustration at increasing rates of violent crime. Today, there are more than 400 people on Death Row in the Philippines, making it one of the countries with the highest sentencing rates in the world.

Key Takeaways:

The death penalty was abolished in the Philippines in 1987 but reintroduced in 1993 for “heinous” crimes.
The country has one of the highest sentencing rates in the world, with over 400 people on Death Row.
Arguments against the death penalty include doubts about its deterrent effect and concerns about fairness in trials.
Studies have shown that the death penalty does not act as a greater deterrent to crime compared to other forms of punishment.
The international community opposes the death penalty, and the Philippines risks violating its human rights obligations if it reinstates it.

The Legal and Human Rights Context

In 1987, the Philippines promulgated a Constitution with a Bill of Rights, solidifying its commitment to upholding human rights. This important document established an independent Commission on Human Rights and affirmed the country’s dedication to international human rights norms by acceding to major human rights treaties.

However, the reintroduction of the death penalty in the Philippines raises significant concerns regarding human rights violations. The right to life and the prohibition of cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment or punishment are fundamental human rights principles that must be protected.

There have been troubling allegations of torture and ill-treatment used to extract confessions, which not only violates human rights but also poses a grave risk of judicial error. These practices undermine the integrity and fairness of the criminal justice system, casting doubt on the credibility of its outcomes.

Furthermore, public doubts persist regarding the equity, impartiality, and effectiveness of the judicial system as a whole. Disparities in access to justice and the unequal treatment of individuals based on their socio-economic status undermine the principles of equality and fairness under the law.

In upholding human rights in the Philippines , it is crucial to critically assess the impact of the death penalty on both the constitutional framework and the broader human rights landscape of the country.

Arguments Against the Death Penalty

Opponents of the death penalty in the Philippines present compelling arguments that challenge its efficacy and fairness in the criminal justice system. These arguments shed light on the flaws and potential injustices associated with capital punishment.

1. Lack of Deterrence

One of the key arguments against the death penalty is that it does not act as a greater deterrent to crime compared to other forms of punishment. Research has shown that the threat of execution does not significantly reduce crime rates. Instead, addressing the root causes of criminal behavior and implementing effective rehabilitation programs have been proven to be more successful in reducing recidivism.

2. Risk of Wrongful Convictions

Another critical concern with the death penalty is the inherent risk of miscarriages of justice. No criminal justice system is immune from errors, and wrongful convictions can and do occur. Once a person is executed, there is no opportunity for exoneration if new evidence or factual errors come to light. This irrevocability magnifies the importance of ensuring fair trials and avoiding irreversible mistakes.

3. Disproportionate Impact on Disadvantaged Sectors

Advocates against the death penalty argue that it disproportionately affects disadvantaged sectors of society, exacerbating inequality before the law. Studies have shown that individuals from marginalized communities, who often lack access to quality legal representation, are more likely to receive harsher sentences, including the death penalty. This systemic bias raises concerns about fairness and equal treatment under the law.

“The death penalty fails to address the root causes of crime and perpetuates a system that disproportionately impacts vulnerable individuals and communities.” – Human Rights Watch

Promoting alternatives to capital punishment that focus on rehabilitation, reform, and addressing societal inequalities could lead to a more just and equitable criminal justice system.

These arguments challenge the effectiveness, fairness, and justice of the death penalty in the Philippines. Considering these concerns is crucial in promoting a criminal justice system that upholds human rights, equality, and the pursuit of genuine justice.

Impact on Crime Levels

Contrary to popular belief, the death penalty does not have a significant impact on reducing crime levels or enhancing the security of law-abiding citizens. Numerous studies conducted in various countries have consistently shown that there is no evidence to support the notion that the death penalty acts as a greater deterrent to criminals than other forms of punishment. Instead, several underlying factors contribute to the root causes of criminal behavior.

The Real Factors Fueling Criminality

Factors such as poverty, social inequality, unemployment, and the weakening of social control methods play a much larger role in fueling criminality. Socioeconomic disparities and lack of access to basic needs often lead individuals towards criminal activities . Addressing these fundamental issues and implementing effective social and economic policies can have a more significant impact on crime reduction and the overall well-being of society.

“The death penalty doesn’t solve the issues of crime; it merely masks the underlying societal problems that need to be addressed.” – Dr. Maria Santos, Criminologist

Statistics on Death Penalty and Crime Rates

Let’s examine the statistics on death penalty implementation and crime rates in several countries:

As seen in the table above, the data does not support the argument that the death penalty leads to lower crime rates. In fact, countries with abolished death penalty have shown low to moderate crime rates, while countries that retain the death penalty exhibit varying levels of crime rates.

The statistics clearly indicate that the death penalty is not a reliable tool for crime prevention. To ensure a safer society, it is crucial to address the root causes of crime and implement comprehensive social and economic reforms that uplift communities and provide opportunities for all individuals.

Concerns about Fair Trials

The rapid rate of death sentences in the Philippines is taking place within a context of public doubts over the equity, impartiality, and effectiveness of the judicial system. There is a perception that those with influence or wealth can enjoy impunity, while those from disadvantaged sectors of society face disadvantage in the criminal justice system. Safeguards to ensure fair trials, including the right to competent legal counsel, are not consistently upheld.

Historical Use of the Death Penalty

The history of the death penalty in the Philippines is a complex and evolving one. Capital punishment has been a part of the country’s criminal justice system during different periods of its history.

Under Spanish rule, the Spanish Codigo Penal of 1848, which was introduced in the Philippines in 1884, included several capital offenses such as treason, piracy, and murder. During this time, the death penalty was carried out through methods such as firing squad and garrote.

Following the introduction of internal self-government in 1934 and full independence in 1946, there were changes in the application of the death penalty. The newly established Philippine government sought to reform the criminal justice system, and discussions on the abolition of the death penalty emerged.

However, in more recent times, the death penalty was reintroduced in the Philippines in 1993 for “heinous” crimes, due to public fear and increasing rates of violent crime. Today, the country grapples with a high number of individuals on Death Row and ongoing debates on the efficacy and ethics of capital punishment.

history of death penalty in the Philippines

International Human Rights Obligations

The Philippines ratified the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights in 2007, which requires countries to abolish the death penalty. Reinstating the death penalty would violate the country’s obligations under international human rights law and could result in consequences from foreign trade partners. The international community, including human rights organizations like Human Rights Watch, opposes the death penalty.

Current Situation and Government Stance

The Duterte administration in the Philippines has publicly supported the reinstatement of the death penalty. This stance aligns with President Rodrigo Duterte’s tough-on-crime approach, particularly in addressing drug offenses. Currently, the House Committee on Justice is deliberating on bills that propose the reintroduction of capital punishment, specifically through lethal injection.

President Duterte’s controversial “war on drugs” has already resulted in thousands of deaths attributed to both the police and unidentified assailants. With the government’s overwhelming majority in Congress, it is likely that the death penalty bills will gain support and further progress in the legislative process.

“We need to bring back the death penalty to instill fear, to deter, to prevent crime,” President Duterte said during his 2020 State of the Nation Address.

The government’s position on the death penalty reflects its determination to tackle crime effectively and send a strong message about the consequences of engaging in illegal activities . However, this stance has drawn criticism and concerns from human rights advocates, who argue that capital punishment can lead to violations of the right to life and may exacerbate issues of judicial fairness and errors.

As the debate on the reintroduction of the death penalty continues, it is essential to consider the potential impact on human rights, the criminal justice system, and the broader social fabric of the Philippines.

Duterte administration and death penalty

Risks and Impact on Human Rights

Reimposing the death penalty in the Philippines would worsen the human rights situation and lead to further violations. It would perpetuate the government’s “war on drugs” and increase bloodshed. The rights-violating abyss that the country would descend into cannot be overstated.

“The death penalty contradicts the right to life and the prohibition of cruel, inhuman, and degrading treatment or punishment. It puts at risk the fundamental principles of justice and fairness,” – International Federation for Human Rights

Reinstating capital punishment would undermine the Philippines’ credibility and leverage to negotiate on behalf of its citizens facing execution abroad. The government’s recent withdrawal from the International Criminal Court, coupled with the potential reintroduction of the death penalty, places the country on a dangerous path towards becoming an international human rights pariah.

The death penalty in the Philippines is a complex issue that raises serious questions about human rights and the fairness of the judicial system. Arguments against the death penalty emphasize concerns regarding its efficacy as a deterrent, the potential for wrongful convictions, and its disproportionate impact on marginalized communities. Furthermore, reintroducing the death penalty would violate the country’s international human rights obligations.

The opposition to capital punishment is not confined to the Philippines alone; the international community, including prominent human rights organizations like Human Rights Watch, rejects the death penalty as a violation of fundamental human rights. Restoring the death penalty would not only damage the Philippines’ standing in the global community but also hinder its ability to advocate for its citizens facing execution abroad.

It is important to consider the government’s stance on the death penalty, particularly in the context of the ongoing “war on drugs” initiated by President Rodrigo Duterte. The administration’s support for capital punishment, combined with the alarming number of extrajudicial killings and human rights abuses, raises concerns about the state of human rights in the country. Reimposing the death penalty would exacerbate these issues and further undermine the Philippines’ credibility as a protector of human rights.

In conclusion, the death penalty in the Philippines should be critically examined in light of its potential ramifications for human rights and the judicial system. The arguments against capital punishment, the opposition from the international community, and the questionable human rights situation within the country all contribute to the conclusion that reinstating the death penalty would be a regressive step that contradicts the principles of justice and human rights.

What is the current status of the death penalty in the Philippines?

What are the main arguments against the death penalty in the philippines, does the death penalty have a significant impact on reducing crime levels, are fair trials guaranteed in the judicial system of the philippines, what is the historical use of the death penalty in the philippines, does the philippines have international human rights obligations regarding the death penalty, what is the government’s stance on the death penalty in the philippines, what are the risks and impact of reinstating the death penalty in the philippines, what is the conclusion regarding the death penalty in the philippines, source links.

https://www.kibin.com/essay-examples/an-argument-against-the-re-imposition-of-the-death-penalty-in-the-philippines-Yy0RFsgW
https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6a99f4.html
https://www.hrw.org/news/2020/08/05/death-penalty-danger-philippines

Hello! I'm Wise, a Filipina with a deep love for my country and a passion for sharing its beauty with the world. As a writer, blogger, and videographer, I capture the essence of the Philippines through my eyes, hoping to give foreign visitors a true taste of what makes these islands so special.

From the vibrant streets of Manila to the tranquil beaches of Palawan, my journey is about uncovering the hidden gems and everyday wonders that define the Filipino spirit. My articles and blogs are not just travel guides; they are invitations to explore, to feel, and to fall in love with the Philippines, just as I have.

Through my videos, I strive to bring the sights, sounds, and stories of my homeland to life. Whether it's the local cuisine, the colorful festivals, or the warm smiles of the people, I aim to prepare visitors for an authentic experience.

For those seeking more than just a vacation, the Philippines can be a place of discovery and, perhaps, even love. My goal is to be your guide, not just to the places you'll visit, but to the experiences and connections that await in this beautiful corner of the world. Welcome to the Philippines, through my eyes. Let's explore together!

Top Vitamin C Brands in the Philippines

Who Is The 17Th President Of The Philippines

17th President of the Philippines Revealed

Top 10 Most Richest In The Philippines Revealed

Add comment, cancel reply.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

Want Flight, Hotel, and Restaurant Discounts for Your Philippines Trip? Join Below!

Email address:

Buy Me a Coffee

Convicted murderer charged in two new Texas killings offers to return to prison in plea

This booking photo provided by the Austin, Texas, Police Department shows Raul Meza Jr. The convicted murderer released from a Texas prison in 1993 and now facing two new murder charges, offered a plea deal Thursday, April 11, 2024 of 50 years back in prison to avoid a new trial and the possibility of the death penalty. (Austin Police Department via AP)

Show more sharing options
Copy Link URL Copied!

A convicted murderer who was released early from a Texas prison in 1993 and now faces two new murder charges offered Thursday to enter a plea and return to prison for 50 years in exchange for avoiding going to trial and facing a possible death sentence — an offer that victims’ families urged prosecutors to reject.

Raul Meza Jr., 63, served about a decade in prison for killing an 8-year-old girl before he was released. He was charged last year with two other killings that happened in 2019 and 2023, and investigators have said they are looking into as many as a 10 other unsolved cases that they think might be connected to Meza.

During a pretrial hearing Thursday, Travis County prosecutors said they had just received the plea offer from Meza’s attorney and hadn’t had time yet to evaluate it. Meza’s lawyer, Russ Hunt, said the number of years in prison was the only term offered, and that there had been no discussion yet whether a deal would require Meza to plead guilty or no contest to the murder charges.

After the hearing, victims’ family members speaking to reporters urged prosecutors to reject the offer.

Meza’s original 1982 conviction and 30-year prison sentence were the result of a plea deal. He was released early after receiving credit for good time.

“It just brought me back to what my parents had to go through when we were children,” said Tracy Page, whose sister Kendra Page was strangled and sexually assaulted by Meza in 1982. “It’s like he’s dictating what he wants. ... To me, in my heart, I want (him) to go to the death penalty.”

Hunt said the offer of 50 years on each murder charge, to be served concurrently, would effectively mean he’d be in prison for life. By law, Meza would be eligible for parole in 30 years, at age 93.

“Mr. Meza would like to avoid a trial and all the trouble and emotional turmoil it brings to everyone involved in the case, including the families of the victims,” Hunt said.

Meza’s early release from prison in 1993 caused an uproar throughout Texas and he was met by protesters at nearly every turn. Picketers drove him out of six cities, sometimes with threats of violence.

“In my heart, I know that I will not willfully bring harm to anyone,″ Meza said during an August 1993 news conference after he had been driven out of communities.

Austin police said Meza called them last May and confessed to killing his 80-year-old roommate, Jesse Fraga, days earlier, and implicated himself in the 2019 sexual assault and killing of Gloria Lofton. Meza was carrying a backpack containing zip ties, a flashlight, duct tape and a .22 caliber pistol with extra rounds when he was arrested, police said.

Meza has been charged with capital murder in Lofton’s killing, which could result in him being sentenced to death or life without the possibility of parole if he’s convicted. He was indicted on a murder charge in Fraga’s death, which could result in a life term.

Top headlines by email, weekday mornings

Get top headlines from the Union-Tribune in your inbox weekday mornings, including top news, local, sports, business, entertainment and opinion.

You may occasionally receive promotional content from the San Diego Union-Tribune.

More in this section

This photo provided by NOAA shows an endangered whale that has been found entangled in fishing gear off the coast of New England. The right whales number less than 360 and they are vulnerable to entanglement in fishing gear and collisions with ships. The entangled whale was seen about 50 miles south of Block Island, Rhode Island, on Wednesday, April 10, 2024, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said. (NOAA Fisheries via AP)

Nation-World

Right whale is found entangled off New England in a devastating year for the vanishing species

Federal authorities say a North Atlantic right whale has been spotted entangled in rope off New England in already devastating year for the vanishing animals

As a landmark United Methodist gathering approaches, African churches weigh their future.

The United Methodist Church lost one-fourth of its U.S. churches in a recent schism, with conservatives departing over disputes on sexuality and theology

In this photo provided on April 12, 2024, by the North Korean government, Choe Ryong Hae, right, vice-chairman of the central committee of the Workers' Party of North Korea, talks with Zhao Leji, left, chairman of the National People’s Congress of China during a reception, at the Mansudae Assembly Hall in Pyongyang, North Korea, on April 11, 2024. (Korean Central News Agency/Korea News Service via AP)

A Chinese official meets North Korean leader Kim in Pyongyang in highest-level talks in years

Chinese state media reports a top ranking official has reaffirmed ties with North Korea during a meeting with the country’s leader Kim Jong Un in the capital Pyongyang

Israeli settlers gather near burning properties of Palestinian villagers after they set on fire, in the West Bank village of al-Mughayyir, Saturday, April 13, 2024. Israel's army says the body of a missing Israeli teen has been found in the occupied West Bank after he was killed in a "terrorist attack." The disappearance of 14-year-old Binyamin Achimair sparked a large attack by settlers on a Palestinian village on Friday and Saturday. (AP Photo/Nasser Nasser)

Israel finds the body of a teen whose disappearance sparked a deadly settler attack in the West Bank

Israel’s army says the body of a missing Israeli teen has been found in the West Bank after he was killed in what it called a “terrorist attack.”

The Israeli army says the body of an Israeli boy was found in the West Bank after he was killed ‘in a terrorist attack’

This photo provided by WAGM-TV, Chandler Cole is interviewed on Feb. 23, 2022 iin Washburn, Maine. Police say Cole accused of lying about a missing person case has been charged with several crimes, including falsifying a report in which he claimed he had taken the missing man to a hospital. Court records indicate Washburn Police Sgt. Chandler Cole resigned after being charged with aggravated forgery, tampering with public records and two other charges.(WAGM-TV via AP)

Search continues in Maine as officer is charged with lying about taking missing person to hospital

Police in Maine say an officer accused of lying about a missing-person case has been charged with several crimes

IMAGES

Death Penalty Persuasive Essay
Gratis Death Penalty Argumentative Essay
💄 Argument essay against death penalty. Against the Death Penalty
Reviving The Death Penalty Free Essay Example
Death Penalty Speech: Arguments For and Against Free Essay Example
Death Penalty Argumentative Essay

COMMENTS

Top 10 Pro & Con Arguments
Top 10 Pro & Con Arguments. 1. Legality. The United States is one of 55 countries globally with a legal death penalty, according to Amnesty International. As of Mar. 24, 2021, within the US, 27 states had a legal death penalty (though 3 of those states had a moratorium on the punishment's use).
Should the Death Penalty Be Abolished?
In the July Opinion essay "The Death Penalty Can Ensure 'Justice Is Being Done,'" Jeffrey A. Rosen, then acting deputy attorney general, makes a legal case for capital punishment:
5 Death Penalty Essays Everyone Should Know
5 Death Penalty Essays Everyone Should Know. Capital punishment is an ancient practice. It's one that human rights defenders strongly oppose and consider as inhumane and cruel. In 2019, Amnesty International reported the lowest number of executions in about a decade. Most executions occurred in China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, and Egypt.
The Death Penalty Can Ensure 'Justice Is Being Done'
As John Duncan was dying of cancer in 2018, he asked family members to promise they would witness the execution on his behalf. On July 17, they did. "Finally," they said in a statement ...
Essays About the Death Penalty: Top 5 Examples and Prompts
In addition, it is inhumane and deprives people of their right to life. 5. The death penalty by Kamala Harris. "Let's be clear: as a former prosecutor, I absolutely and strongly believe there should be serious and swift consequences when one person kills another. I am unequivocal in that belief.
Reconsidering the Death Penalty: a Student's Perspective
This essay is about the death penalty, also known as SMU (State-Mandated Execution), from the perspective of a student in higher education. It examines the ethical and moral complexities surrounding capital punishment, highlighting concerns about its irreversible nature, disproportionate impact on marginalized communities, and ineffectiveness as a deterrent against crime.
10+ Top Examples of Persuasive Essay About Death Penalty
6. Get feedback. Lastly, consider asking someone else to read over your essay before you submit it. Feedback from another person can help you see any weaknesses in your argument or areas that need improvement. Summing up, Writing a persuasive essay about the death penalty doesnâ t have to be overwhelming. With these examples and tips, you can ...
Capital punishment
Capital punishment - Arguments, Pros/Cons: Capital punishment has long engendered considerable debate about both its morality and its effect on criminal behaviour. Contemporary arguments for and against capital punishment fall under three general headings: moral, utilitarian, and practical. Supporters of the death penalty believe that those who commit murder, because they have taken the life ...
The Death Penalty
The death penalty violates the most fundamental human right - the right to life. It is the ultimate cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment. The death penalty is discriminatory. It is often used against the most vulnerable in society, including the poor, ethnic and religious minorities, and people with mental disabilities.
Congo brings back the death penalty
Congo brings back the death penalty. C ritics of Congo's government are on edge—and for good reason. Last month the justice ministry said it was bringing back the death penalty, ending a ...
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review
James P. Gray*. For decades the death penalty has been an emotional and almost unmentionable issue that has affected people in a myriad of different ways.1 Regardless of people's philosophic points of view, it is important to be aware of the facts. This Essay addresses head-on most of the common arguments that are used in favor of the death ...
Writing a Persuasive Essay About Death Penalty with Examples
When writing a persuasive essay, you need to think about what kind of evidence can support the death penalty argument. Depending on your topic, this could include facts and data, examples from real life, or quotes from experts. You want to convince them that your opinion is the one that matters most. After all, persuasion is at the heart of any ...
The death penalty
Arguments for the death penalty. If someone murders someone else, they have given up their human rights, including the one to stay alive themselves. The punishment should 'fit the crime' - if you ...
Bringing Back the Death Penalty in South Africa for Crimes ...
The public outcry from the tragic events of September and their affirmation in official government statistics sparked over 590,000 South Africans signing a petition calling for the death penalty to be reinstated for crimes against women. Bringing back the death penalty, despite public demand, is not just a case of instituting a harsher sentence ...
Essay: Arguments against the Death Penalty
what distinguishes us from murderers is that we ONLY kill when necessary, if for example there was a serial killer arrested a death penalty is necessary because 1. if said killer ever breaks out they could kill many more people, and 2. the government is already pouring enough money into the prisons right now. more people means more money needed. money that could go to our military or police.
Should The UK Reintroduce The Death Penalty
One of the largest arguments as to why the UK should not reintroduce the death penalty is that lives should not be taken. The death penalty is clearly a denial of the human right to live. This opposes the ideology of retribution because although the criminal may have committed a serious crime, nobody deserves to be killed. 'The value of the ...
'Why we should consider bringing back the death penalty'
We should give serious consideration to bringing back capital punishment, writes Sam Truelove. News opinion. By. Sam Truelove Content editor. Capital punishment ended in the UK in 1965 (Image: Birmingham Mail) The death penalty is a controversial subject. Since capital punishment ended in the UK in 1965, some have been glad to see the back of ...
Does the public want the death penalty brought back?
The Restore Justice campaign, spearheaded by Paul Staines who writes the Guido Fawkes political blog, calls for the death penalty to be brought back for child and police officer murderers. He ...
Death Penalty Essay
2. The death penalty is a government-sanctioned process. 3. Death penalties vary depending on the jurisdiction. 4. It includes severe offences like piracy, aircraft hijacking, drug trafficking, and a crime against humanity. 5. 56 countries retain death penalties, and 106 countries have completely abolished it.
Death Penalty
In mine and 56% of the world's opinion the death penalty should be brought back for the people who deserve it. The bible states that "an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth" is a fair system and this is a familiar saying around the death penalty subject; this is where people believe that if you take someone's life, you should have ...
Free Essay: Death Penalty
The death penalty or otherwise known as the capital punishment is a legal process where a person is put to death by the state as a punishment for a crime. Currently it is only allowed in 32 states and has come to discussion if the death penalty should be reinstated back in the UK.…. 1229 Words. 5 Pages.
Should Canada bring back the death penalty?
Last week, letters editor Paul Russell asked if it was time to bring back capital punishment. A majority of respondents said "yes.". Here are some of the letters (limited to 75 words or less ...
Exploring the Death Penalty in the Philippines Essay
The death penalty was abolished in the Philippines in 1987 but reintroduced in 1993 for "heinous" crimes. The country has one of the highest sentencing rates in the world, with over 400 people on Death Row. Arguments against the death penalty include doubts about its deterrent effect and concerns about fairness in trials.
Putin Allies Demand Return of Death Penalty After Moscow Attack
Senior members of Russian President Vladimir Putin's regime have called for the country to bring back the death penalty following Friday's attack on a Moscow concert hall.
Putin acknowledges radical Islamists carried out Moscow terror attack
Kremlin faces calls to bring back death penalty as tortured suspects are paraded - one of whom was force-fed his own ear Roland Oliphant, Senior Foreign Correspondent 25 March 2024 • 8:21pm
Convicted murderer charged in two new Texas killings offers to return
The convicted murderer released from a Texas prison in 1993 and now facing two new murder charges, offered a plea deal Thursday, April 11, 2024 of 50 years back in prison to avoid a new trial and ...

5 Death Penalty Essays Everyone Should Know

“When We Kill”

“An Inhumane Way of Death”

“We Need To Talk About An Injustice”

“I Know What It’s Like To Carry Out Executions”

“There Is No Such Thing As Closure on Death Row”

You may also like

15 Great Charities to Donate to in 2024

15 Quotes Exposing Injustice in Society

14 Trusted Charities Helping Civilians in Palestine

The Great Migration: History, Causes and Facts

Social Change 101: Meaning, Examples, Learning Opportunities

Rosa Parks: Biography, Quotes, Impact

Top 20 Issues Women Are Facing Today

Top 20 Issues Children Are Facing Today

15 Root Causes of Climate Change

15 Facts about Rosa Parks

Abolitionist Movement: History, Main Ideas, and Activism Today

The Biggest 15 NGOs in the UK

The Death Penalty Can Ensure ‘Justice Is Being Done’

Essays About the Death Penalty: Top 5 Examples and Prompts

1. The Issues of Death Penalties and Social Justice in The United States (Author Unknown)

Reconsidering the Death Penalty: a Student’s Perspective

Cite this page

Don't let plagiarism ruin your grade

Craft an Effective Argument: Examples of Persuasive Essay About Death Penalty

What Do We Mean by a Persuasive Essay?

Persuasive Essay About Death Penalty Examples

Argumentative Essay About Death Penalty Examples

6 Tips To Write an A+ Persuasive Essay

Frequently Asked Questions

How do you start a persuasive speech on the death penalty?

What are good topics for persuasive essays?

Keep reading

Crafting a Compelling Persuasive Essay About Death Penalty

What is a Persuasive Essay?

Persuasive Essay About Death Penalty Examples

Argumentative Essay About Death Penalty Examples

Persuasive Essay Writing Tips

Frequently Asked Questions

How do you start a persuasive speech on the death penalty?

What are good topics for persuasive essays?

Was This Blog Helpful?

Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Contact Us

Constitutional_court_of_South_Africa.jpeg

Bringing Back the Death Penalty in South Africa for Crimes Against Women

About Jade Weiner

Share this:

The Transformative Possibilities of a Constitution (with Joel Modiri and Gautam Bhatia)

Criminal Justice and the Death Penalty in India: An Opinion Study with 60 Former Supreme Court Judges

Federal Judge Strikes Down California Death Penalty as Unconstitutional

Submit a Comment Cancel reply

Submit Journal Contribution

Journal content

Submit Blog Contribution

Essay: Arguments against the Death Penalty

Related Posts

Author: William Anderson (Schoolworkhelper Editorial Team)

10 Comments

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Should The UK Reintroduce The Death Penalty

Cite this Essay

Related Essays

Still can’t find what you need?

Related Topics

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

'Why we should consider bringing back the death penalty'

Today's most read stories on MyLondon

Follow reporter Sam Truelove on social media

Death Penalty – Should it be brought back Essay Example

Haven't found what you were looking for?

Unfortunately copying the content is not possible

Should Canada bring back the death penalty?

Article content

Ontario resident who wants both a vagina and penis wins public funding for unique surgery

Beauty Buzz: Biotherm Blue Peptides Uplift Firming Day Cream, Virtue Hydrating Healing Hair Oil, and Dr. Hauschka Regenerating Intensive Eye Serum

How to clean and season cast iron pans

The best online deals in the Canadian retail space right now

5 spring sunglasses guaranteed to elevate your eyewear game

You've reached the 20 article limit.