research topics for occupational health and safety

• Dissertation Examples
• Dissertation Chapter Examples
• Literature Review Example
• Report Example
• Assignment Example
• Coursework Example

• Report Generating Service
• Model Answers and Exam Notes Writing
• Dissertation Topic and Outline
• Reflective or Personal Report Writing
• Poster Writing
• Literature Review Writing
• Statistical Analysis Services
• Premier Sample Dissertations
• Dissertation Chapter
• Course Work
• Cognitive Psychology Dissertation Topics
• 15 Interesting Music Dissertation Topics
• Physical Education Dissertation Topics
• 15 Top Forensic Science Dissertation Topics
• Top 10 Clinical Psychology Dissertation Topics
• Islamic Finance Dissertation Topics
• Social Psychology Dissertation Topics
• Educational Psychology Dissertation Topics
• Business Intelligence Dissertation Topics
• Customer Service Dissertation Topics
• Criminal Psychology Dissertation Topics

• Coursework Plagiarism Checker
• Plagiarism Remover Service
• Turnitin Plagiarism Checker
• Paraphrasing and Plagiarism
• Free Plagiarism Checker for Students
• How to Cite Sources to Avoid Plagiarism?
• Assignment Plagiarism Checker
• Best Dissertation Plagiarism Checker
• Thesis Plagiarism Checker
• Report Plagiarism Checker
• Similarity Checker
• How Plagiarism Checkers Work?
• Plagiarism Checker Free
• FREE Topics

Tourism Dissertation Topics | 45+ Latest Ideas For Your Research

Refurbishment of Old Houses in London | English Heritage Listed Buildings

• Dissertation Topics

Health and safety refers to the study of various aspects of maintaining health and securing the safety of the people. Health and safety are crucial duties of the state. Doctors keep people healthy and soldiers provide security. Research in this field is important for people's well-being. Thus, students must choose quality health and safety dissertation topics for their research modules.

 Review Complete List of Healthcare Dissertation Examples  

Premier Dissertations has developed an extended list of 45+ exciting research topics and examples in health and safety.

If you would like to choose any topic from the given list, simply drop us a WhatsApp or an Email .

You may like to review ;

Mental Health Dissertation Topics | Healthcare Management Dissertation Topics

3-Step  Dissertation Process!

Get 3+ Topics

Dissertation Proposal

Get Final Dissertation

List of new health and safety research topics 2024, how does it work .

Fill the Form

Writer Starts Working

3+ Topics Emailed!

Research topics in health and safety, trending health and safety thesis topics, health and safety thesis topics 2024.

Testimonials

Very satisfied students

This is our reason for working. We want to make all students happy, every day. Review us on Sitejabber

The Importance of Finding the Best Occupational Health and Safety Dissertation Topic

Choosing the right dissertation topic is crucial in occupational health and safety. It directly impacts the policies that protect workers in the workplace. Good topics can make a difference in the world by ensuring fair labor practices and limiting exploitation. 

 For further dissertation assistance, please visit the following;

Dissertation Topic and Outline Service 

Review the Full List of Dissertation Topics

For more Occupational Health and Safety dissertation topics, please keep visiting our website as we keep updating our existing list of topics.

Get an Immediate Response

Discuss your requirements with our writers

WhatsApp Us Email Us Chat with Us

Get 3+ Free   Dissertation Topics within 24 hours?

Your Number

Academic Level Select Academic Level Undergraduate Masters PhD

Area of Research

Discover More:

Related posts

110 Best GIS Project Ideas for Developers in 2024

140 Creative DNA Model Project Ideas for Students

150 SAE Project Ideas for Students

Comments are closed.

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals

Occupational health articles from across Nature Portfolio

Latest research and reviews.

A multi-center evaluation of a novel IVF cryostorage device in an active clinical setting

• Michael G. Collins
• Jessica Bailey
• Ashley Souza

Immediate and evolving emotions among directly exposed survivors 7 years after the Oklahoma City bombing

• E. Whitney Pollio
• Helena Zhang
• Carol S. North

The implications of healthcare professionals wearing jewelry on patient care biosafety: observational insights and experimental approaches

• Isabela Fernanda Larios Fracarolli
• Evandro Watanabe
• Maria Helena Palucci Marziale

Cerebral homeostasis and orthostatic responses in residents of the highest city in the world

• M. Ulliel-Roche
• J. V. Brugniaux

Circulating white blood cell traits and prolonged night shifts: a cross-sectional study based on nurses in Guangxi

• Zhenkun Tang
• Yuanfang Liu
• Haizhou Liu

Expiration analysis of the International Space Station formulary for exploration mission planning

• Thomas E. Diaz
• Emma C. Ives
• Daniel M. Buckland

News and Comment

How far does feedback on oral malodor assessment influence the decision to quit smoking.

• Omer Waleed Majid

RA risk from occupational inhalation

• Robert Phillips

Compassion, mindfulness, and the happiness of healthcare workers

A selection of abstracts of clinically relevant papers from other journals.

The abstracts on this page have been chosen and edited by Reena Wadia

Community dental team screen factory workers for mouth cancer

• Tami Lampert

Mental health: Degree and depression

New needlestick injury survey

Quick links.

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

• Open access
• Published: 25 November 2022

A study on occupational health and safety

• Lídia Maria Costa Araújo Magalhães 1 ,
• Ketyllem Tayanne da Silva Costa   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0304-2639 2 ,
• Gustavo Nepomuceno Capistrano 2 ,
• Maryanna Damasceno Leal 3 &
• Fábia Barbosa de Andrade 4  

BMC Public Health volume  22 , Article number:  2186 ( 2022 ) Cite this article

11k Accesses

3 Citations

1 Altmetric

Metrics details

This study aimed to evaluate and describe the indicators of occupational health, with a focus on the medical expertise and periodic medical examination.

This is exploratory-descriptive, cross-sectional, documentary, quantitative, and retrospective research, in the historical series: 2011 to 2015.

The number of lost days of work per worker and the frequency of licenses increased despite the decrease in the Absenteeism Duration Index and stabilization of the Frequency of Medical Workers. As for the adhesion of the workers to the Periodic Medical Examinations, it was decreasing, with a higher percentage in the year 2012 (35.3%). During the analyzed period, 5,186 workers performed the Periodic Medical Examination, and the majority (60.6%) presented non-ideal weight, 41.1% were sedentary, 33.2% had dyslipidemia, 29.0% were alcoholic, 3.2% were smokers, 5.9% had diabetics, and 16.4% reported high noise in the workplace, 27.8% inadequate lighting and 35.9% inadequate work furniture.

Conclusions

The results highlight the need to maintain and strengthen the Worker Health and Safety Policy with emphasis on surveillance, aiming at the promotion and protection of the health of the workers, based on the elaboration of the epidemiological profile of health and, consequently, the implementation of positive impact strategies.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Historically, in Brazil, Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) is strongly associated with the political-social and economic evolution of the country and is presented as the achievement of rights resulting from claims and struggles of the workers. Work is one of the determinants that most impact man’s conditions, quality of life, and health.

Working is essential for human beings since it is the way in which respect, integration, sociability, recognition, and bonds of friendship are obtained. On the other hand, the living conditions of Brazilian workers are aggravated by the alternation of stages of growth and accelerated industrialization with moments of recession, resulting in the government’s adoption of adjustment measures and financial cuts in social policies, such as education, health, safety, transportation, housing, and work, among others [ 1 , 2 ].

Nowadays, the epidemiological profile of workers' morbidity and mortality in Brazil is characterized by the coexistence of diseases that have an intrinsic relationship with working conditions: diseases related to work and typical work accidents, which have their frequency, appearance, and severity modified by the activity. Added to this reality are diseases common to the population as a whole, which have no etiological relationship with work [ 3 ].

Health Promotion and Surveillance refer to the pillar of the Occupational Safety and Health Care Policy (PASS, in Portuguese) that encompasses quality of life and vigilance actions in the environmental and work processes. Standing out among these are the institution of guidelines and programs in the area of mental health and occupational diseases of higher prevalence; the mandatory provision of Periodic Medical Examinations (PME) for all employees; the training in health and safety at work; the creation of an Internal Committee on Health and Safety at Work and a survey of environmental risks, with a stimulus to the active participation of employees in processes involving their health [ 4 , 5 ].

The PME aims, mainly, the prevention, enabling the health surveillance of the employees of a certain company or institution, contributing to the early identification of diseases related or not to work. It is carried out by an occupational doctor and employers must provide examinations for employees at specific times such as dismissal, admission, leaves of absence or change of function, in addition to periodic examinations, which will vary in frequency according to the workers' age (every two years for those between 18 and 45 years old and annually for those outside this age group) [ 6 ].

The PME is performed through clinical examinations, anamnesis, general and specific laboratory tests, according to the function developed by each worker. In addition, the occupational physician must adapt the exams to the particularities of each case, for example, people with disabilities or people who work with noise and may experience deafness caused by this fact. The result of the PME is not given by score or a question of approve or disapprove workers, it is related to the early diagnosis of health problems [ 6 ].

It is noteworthy that the information generated during the expertise act are important indicators of worker's health, privileged instruments for the construction of the morbidity and mortality profile of public servants, which will help to conduct the development of health promotion actions, since the expert databases issue a variety of data on the most prevalent diseases and the professionals who get sick [ 7 ].

It is of great importance to deepen the study in relation to the health of the federal public servant, considering the need to research, know and analyze the determining and conditioning factors of health problems related to processes and work environments. In this way, it is important to analyze workers' health indicators, which are reflections of the real health conditions of the server, with the objective of guiding managers in the planning and control of activities, in addition to allowing deductions regarding the effects of decisions and their results.

From this perspective, this study aimed to evaluate and describe occupational health indicators focusing on the Official Health Expertise and PME of federal public servants, including professors from the institution and administrative technicians from the education sector of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte.

Materials and methods

This is a cross-sectional, retrospective study with a quantitative approach, where secondary data were obtained regarding PME and official health expertise, specifically the SIAPE HEALTH module of federal public servants of a public institution of higher education in Brazil.

The information contained in this system is federal level and is entered by the experts who perform the exams, uploading them directly into the system, enabling access to the information by users. For the study, secondary and aggregated data from the SIAPE SAÚDE system database were evaluated, as well as management reports made available by the SIASS Unit (Subsistema Integrado de Atenção à Saúde do Servidor) from UFRN, responsible for storing such data.

The study was carried out at the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Central Campus, especially at the Directorate of Attention to Servant Health (DAS), where the SIASS Unit is located, the latter being responsible for coordinating actions in attention to the health of the institution's servants, specifically, the performance of the Periodic Medical Examination and the Official Health Survey, objects of this study.

The period chosen for the study was from 2011 to 2015. The preference for this time interval was justified by the fact that the year 2011 marks the beginning of the PME through the computerized system SIAPE HEALTH, and the end of the study period in 2015 characterizes five complete years and the historical nature of epidemiological studies.

The population chosen for the study can be divided into levels of education, the teachers, technical-administrative in education, higher level positions are level E, while the technical-administrative in education, middle and basic level positions are levels C and D.

The official health expertise and the PME were used as a dependent variable. For each indicator, independent variables were selected: a) Official Health Expertise: gender, age, position, number of active statutory employees away, number of days of leave and number of days away; and b) PME: Gender, age, position, ethnicity, smoking, physical activity, BMI, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, spinal pain, inadequate furniture, inadequate lighting, likes what you do, good relationship with the boss, good relationship with colleagues and fast pace. In addition, the following indicators were observed: Absence Severity Index (IGA), Medical Frequency Leave (FML), Frequency of Workers on Sick Leave (FWML) and Absenteeism Duration Index (IDA), as recommended by the Permanent Commission and International Association on Occupational Health [ 8 ] and the authors Hensing et al. [ 9 ].

The information was obtained from Microsoft Excel spreadsheets, being possible to organize and sort the variables into categories. Then, the data were exported and analyzed in the software Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS). Relative and absolute frequency distribution was used for categorical variables, as well as measures of central tendency (average), measures of dispersion (standard deviation), and student's t-test for quantitative variables.

For data analysis, the chi-square test and the calculation of the odds ratio were used for correlation of the indicators, adopting a confidence interval of 95% and a significance level of 5% ( p  < 0.05) for all tests.

Concerning the ethical aspects, the project was submitted to the Research Ethics Committee of Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte where it was appraised and subsequently approved under opinion no. 1.707.691, from the principles of ethical and legal aspects that govern scientific research on human beings, as recommended by Resolution no. 466/12 [ 10 ], and the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki.

The results showed that there were 4,293 (35%) departures from administrative records and 7,946 (65%) absences from work granted by expert examination.

This expert examination is a procedure carried out by a medical expert, whose function is to identify if there is the presence of an illness or to identify if there has been an accident that has made you totally or partially, temporarily, or permanently unable to perform your professional activities [ 11 ]. The magnitude of these absences can be portrayed when we calculate the sum of lost work time over the five years, which generated 179,916 days of absenteeism due to illness.

Data regarding the sociodemographic characteristics of the studied population revealed that 67.9% (8,312) of the departures occurred in female workers and, for males, 32.1% (3,927). Regarding the age group, 34.6% (4,234) of the licenses were approved for workers between 51 and 60 years old, 24.0% (2,934) from 41 to 50 years, 19.2% (2,355) from 31 to 40 years, 11.8% (1,449) from 18 to 30 years, and 10.4% (1,267) over 60 years.

In relation to the post variable, the number of workers occupying the position of administrative technician in education levels C and D predominated, with a prevalence of 62.2% (4,941), while 23.8% (1,889) workers were in higher-level positions.

Figure  1 shows the absence of workers at work due to health care in the period from 2011 to 2015. It is noteworthy that there is an increase between 2011 and 2013, when there is a peak of 7.1 days not worked. The following years show an oscillation, but with a tendency for growth.

Source: Elaborated by the Authors

Indicators of absenteeism, 2011–2015. Natal/RN, Brazel, 2017. Legend IGA = Absenteeism Severity Index; FLM = Frequency of Medical Licence; IDA = Absenteeism Duration Index; FTLM = Frequency of Workers on Medical Licence.

In this sense, it is also relevant to present the individual absence duration, according to the cause of illness, in order to facilitate the adoption of specific measures focused on the pathologies with the greatest impact on lost days of work. Figure  2 shows the IDA according to each International Classification of Diseases (ICD), 10 chapter, and the highest indexes refer to neoplasms (45.64), mental disorders (32.40), congenital malformations (27.00), and diseases of the circulatory system (23.96), respectively. These findings reveal that absences of longer duration were caused by pathologies of a chronic non-transmissible nature, except for causes of absences in chapter XVII of ICD-10.

Source: Elaborated by the author

Distribution of IDA, 2011–2015. Natal/RN, Brazil, 2017. Legend: C = ICD.10 chapter.

Figure  3 presents the results of this study regarding the adherence of the workers to the Periodic Medical Exam (PME), considering the historical series from 2011 to 2015, when an average of 4,362 workers were called.

Source: Elaborated by the authors

Distribution of call, adhesion, non-adhesion, and coverage ratio to PME, 2011–2015. Natal/RN, Brazil, 2017.

The Periodic Medical Exam consists of the periodic clinical and laboratorial evaluation of the worker, due to the existing risks in the work environment and occupational or professional diseases. The PME foresees the adoption of prevention, tracking, and early diagnosis measures for work-related diseases, besides those more prevalent in the general population, such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, neoplasms, dyslipidemias, and ophthalmologic diseases. Also, the PME will be carried out during working hours, without any burden or need for compensating schedules on the part of the employees. It is important to point out that absenteeism is taken into consideration only due to the worker's personal illness, and this diagnosis cannot be related to someone in the employee's care.

Regarding the operationalization for the PME, it is important to mention that at the moment the server is called for the evaluation of occupational health, through personal e-mail, he/she must fill out the consent form as a way to prove the agreement to participate in periodic medical examinations. Thus, going from the situation "INVITED" to "CONFIRMED". It is worth pointing out the importance and potential of the PME, once it allows the early identification of risk factors for getting sick, as well as the construction of collective diagnoses in the Worker's Health area, which makes this action a health management instrument, for monitoring the health situation and work conditions, and the subsidies for interventions to improve the quality of life of the workers.

It can be observed that the call-up ratio increased by 42.0% from 2011 (0.49) to 2012 (0.91). From the year 2013 (0.84), there were oscillations characterized by drop and growth in the calls.

As for non-adherence, in 2012, there was a decrease, and in 2013 (0.78), 2014 (0.8), and 2015 (0.86), there was an increase in the results, characterizing a relevant increase of 15. 0% between the years of 2011 (0.71) and 2015 (0.86).

About PME membership, it is clear that growth occurred only in 2012 (0.35). Then, the index decreased throughout the series, namely: 2013 (0.22), 2014 (0.2) and 2015 (0.14), which explains the non-adherence data, that comprehends the number of called servers that didn't do the PME in the analyzed year, having as reference the total number of UFRN's servers summoned in the evaluated year as being an unfavorable reality in relation to the PME recommendation. This may be related to factors such as excessive work activities of workers, periodic examinations performed through private health insurance, and to the lack of recognition of the importance of PME by workers.

The coverage ratio of the PME represents the servers that have concluded the PME and those that have an updated Occupational Health Certificate in the analyzed year, with the total number of servers at UFRN in the analyzed period as a reference. This coverage ratio increased significantly in the year 2012 (0.4), showing a growth of 26.0% in relation to 2011. Thereafter, the ratio decreased, with an average of 0.26 between the years of 2013 (0.33), 2014 (0.26) and 2015 (0.2), as shown in Fig.  3 .

In the list of risk factors, health indicators of different epidemiological natures were analyzed. Among them, those related to cardiovascular diseases and occupational risk factors, such as the existence of inadequate work furniture and accelerated work rhythm, are presented in Tables 1 and 2 .

In the list of chronic pathologies covering categories II and III of the Schilling classification, the most common causes of morbidity among workers are: Systemic Arterial Hypertension (SAH), chronic respiratory diseases, diseases of the locomotor system and mental disorders. These are pathologies of multiple etiology in which work is considered a risk factor associated with the increased probability of occurrence of these diseases [ 12 ]. Thus, the present study highlights cardiovascular diseases, especially SAH.

Table 1 shows the distribution of the aforementioned risk factors associated with SAH. It is pointed out that 60.6% (3,143) of the workers that performed the EMP presented non-ideal weight; 58.7% (3,044) practiced some type of physical activity; 70.8% (3,670) denied alcohol use; 96.5% (5.005) did not smoke; 93.9% (4,870) did not have diabetes mellitus (DM); and 66.6% (3,453) did not have dyslipidemia. The association between hypertension and all correlated variables was significant at p  < 0.001. As for the Odds Ratio calculation, we considered the hypertension disease in relation to the following variables: BMI, sedentary lifestyle, alcoholism, smoking, diabetes, and dyslipidemia. The OR calculation does not imply a cause-and-effect relationship, it only suggests that there is an association.

In Table 2 , it is possible to observe that 35.9% of the interviewed workers are not adequate for their activities. In addition, 16.4% report loud noise in the workplace and 27.8% do not have adequate lighting. Social factors were also obtained, noting that 3.7% of the workers surveyed say they do not have a good relationship with their co-workers, while 4.4% do not have a good relationship with their boss and 2.5% show dissatisfaction with what they are doing.

It should be noted that absenteeism is a term used to denote the employee's absence from work [ 13 ]. The International Organization of Work (OIT) defines it as the period of absence of work that is accepted as attributable to an incapacity of the individual, except for that derived from normal pregnancy or prison [ 14 ].

According to the report of the National Audit Office [ 15 ], in the city of Guernsey, United Kingdom, approximately 3.8% of working time was lost due to illness, and civil workers became sick for an average of 8.7 days in 2005. In Chile, health workers belong to the category that has the highest rates of disability due to illness, with 14.3 days of absence per worker per year; unlike the university workers, who present 6 days of work lost per year, similar to the results of this research [ 16 ]. These findings highlight the data shown in Fig.  1 .

Studies found an average of 7.5 lost days of work per year per worker in the nursing area of a university hospital in Brazil [ 17 ]. Santos and Mattos [ 18 ] observed 9.3 days of absenteeism due to disease for each municipal worker of the city of Porto Alegre in 2005. The studies reported 9.1 and 10.3 days of absence due to illness for each public worker of the municipalities of Goiânia and São Paulo, respectively [ 19 , 20 ].

The worker and financial conditions can cause work accidents and environmental conditions, increase work capacity and the market, which may exclude work and consumption capacity. The employee is also hit with productivity, lack of manpower, loss of manpower and/or equipment damage [ 21 ].

The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates about 36 million annual deaths from Chronic Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs), composed mainly of circulatory diseases, neoplasms, chronic respiratory diseases and Diabetes Mellitus (DM), which have risk factors.—smoking, alcohol, physical inactivity, unhealthy diet and obesity—modifiable in common [ 22 , 23 ].

An important characteristic of epidemiological patterns in Brazil concerns the changes in the composition of morbidity and mortality by groups of causes. Thus, the high prevalence of deaths from infectious and parasitic diseases, present at the beginning of the twentieth century, gave way to NCDs and injuries related to accidents and violence [ 24 ].

In Brazil, according to the Ministry of Health [ 23 ], NCDs are among the main causes of hospital admissions, and the financial cost to the Unified Health System (SUS) represents a growing impact. Estimates for Brazil suggest that the loss of productivity at work and the decrease in family income resulting from chronic pathologies such as diabetes, heart disease and stroke involved spending of US$ 4.18 billion between 2006 and 2015 [ 25 ].

The researchers Moura, Carvalho and Silva (2007) [ 26 ] carried out a study on the repercussion of CNCDs in the granting of social security benefits by the National Institute of Social Security (INSS) and identified musculoskeletal and circulatory system diseases as the main causes for granting sick pay.

This reality is also revealed among public servants in several studies that present the main groups of causes of sick leave for this category of workers, with high rates of absenteeism due to diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue, mental and behavioral disorders, chronic respiratory diseases and circulatory system diseases [ 7 , 19 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 ].

The implementation of strategies to reduce absenteeism is a great challenge for employers, and it is necessary to analyze the events in the workplace to delineate situational diagnoses and guarantee actions to promote worker health. For the authors, the change in the epidemiological profile of illness and the increase in the prevalence of chronic diseases, as shown in Fig.  2 , reveal concern for the global scenario regarding the impact of these diseases on workers' health, due to the growth in the number of lost workdays [ 21 ].

The epidemiological profile of morbidity and mortality in Brazilian workers is characterized by the coexistence of diseases that have an intrinsic relation with working conditions, and in addition, diseases common to the population are observed, which are not etiologically related to the work [ 3 ]. In this reality, it is important to emphasize the importance of the employees performing the Periodic Medical Examination (PME), for the prevention and/or possible early detection of the pathologies that generate the greatest impact on the lost days of work, highlighting the neoplasms [ 22 ].

The importance of performing the PME in the screening of risk factors for chronic non-communicable diseases, such as dyslipidemia, sedentary lifestyle, obesity, arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, alcoholism, and smoking is highlighted. In addition, through the PME, the workers will be guided and sent to participate in the various health promotion programs offered by the institution. Through these strategies, it is possible to reduce the prevalence of diseases of the circulatory system, another important cause of absenteeism, as shown in Fig.  2 .

As for Fig.  3 , which shows data on the PME, despite weaknesses, it is evident that the most satisfactory results of PME adherence occurred in the year 2012, a time when workers composed the Integrated Subsystem Unit (SIASS in Portuguese), as well as the constant discussion in forums, national meetings, and events related to the PASS, in a context of articulation in defense of the strengthening of the actions of attention to workers' health, which may have contributed to the results [ 23 , 24 , 25 ].

On the other hand, the situational diagnosis of low PME adherence throughout the historical series was possibly influenced by the recent history of PASS construction and the negative impact of the lack of structuring, planning, and evaluation of the actions. Plus, the largest investments and training, by the Ministry of Planning of Brazil, were related to the expert area which reflects as the main activity of the PASS [ 4 ].

The implementation of actions of health surveillance and promotion are major challenges for the consolidation of SIASS, since it is still a recent practice to promote health in public sector workplaces. It is necessary to elaborate indicators to support the actions and allow the evaluation of the results, considering that the information generated through indicators consolidates the control and planning of the organizational processes, as well as supports the decision making [ 25 , 26 ].

This is a prevention tool that has been implemented in Brazil with workers from federal agencies to identify risk factors associated with future illnesses. This approach in the federal public service has had an impact on the quality of preventive health, avoiding the removal of workers from their workplace for a cause classified as a possible prevention of this disease. Another aspect is the increasing number of absences that have been occurring in recent years, that is, the numbers of absenteeism due to physical and mental illnesses, a fact that occurs at increasingly younger workers' ages, which reveals the need for special attention and protector follow-up in their quality of life.

The results presented in this study deserve attention and can contribute to discussions between the professionals of the technical team and managers of the SIASS Unit and PROGESP/UFRN, as it is believed that the production of knowledge about the subject under study can provide the University with instruments, as well as other institutions at the federal public service level, through the PME as an indicator for planning and evaluating Occupational Health actions.

Thus, continuous investments in health policies aimed at public servants are suggested, which contributes to the reduction of illness and early retirement, resulting from disability. In this sense, investment in research that allows a better understanding of the relationship between health and work in the public service is also recommended.

It should be noted that this study had some limitations, as the use of self-reported data by employees who completed the PME may underestimate or overestimate the results presented.

In order to meet the proposed objective, there was the occurrence of neoplasms, mental disorders, and diseases of the circulatory system in terms of duration of absenteeism (IDA), which were the causes of the absences with a longer duration, which ratifies the epidemiological importance and the impact of non-communicable chronic diseases on workers' health. The gravity index of absenteeism revealed that the number of lost days of work per year per worker increased over the historical series, as well as the frequency of absences.

With regard to the epidemiological profile of the employees who underwent the PME throughout the historical series, it was possible to identify a significant prevalence of overweight in the population. The working conditions were considered satisfactory in the perception of the workers. It should be noted that this study presented some limitations, since the use of self-reported data by the workers may underestimate or overestimate the presented results.

Also observed through this study is the need to maintain and strengthen the PASS with emphasis on surveillance, aiming at the promotion and protection of the health of the workers, based on the elaboration of the epidemiological health profile and, consequently, the implementation of strategies of positive impact for OHS.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

International Classification of Diseases 

Diabetes mellitus

Frequency of Medical Licence

Frequency of Workers on Medical Licence

Occupational Health and Safety

Absenteeism Duration Index

Absence Severity Index

International Organization of Work

Occupational Safety and Health Care Policy

Periodic Medical Examinations

Systemic Arterial Hypertension

Integrated Subsystem Unit

Statistical Package for Social Science

Medeiros Júnior A. Representação social sobre o acidente de trabalho na área da saúde. 172f. Tese (Doutorado em Ciências da Saúde) - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde, Natal, 2005. Available from: https://repositorio.ufrn.br/handle/123456789/13370 . Accessed 10 Oct 2016.

Costa D, et al. Saúde do Trabalhador no SUS: desafios para uma política pública. Revista Brasileira de Saúde Ocupacional. 2013;38(127):11–21. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0303-76572013000100003 (Accessed 10 Oct 2016).

Article   Google Scholar  

Dias EC, Ribeiro EEN (Cord.). Construindo ações de Saúde do Trabalhador no âmbito das superintendências e gerências regionais de saúde. Belo Horizonte: Secretaria do Estado da Saúde de Minas Gerais, 2011. Available from: https://www.nescon.medicina.ufmg.br/biblioteca/imagem/2839.pdf . Accessed 10 Oct 2016.

Bizarria FPA, et al. Ações públicas voltadas para a promoção da saúde do trabalhador: Análise da política destinada à saúde do servidor público federal. Revista Eletrônica Gestão e Saúde. 2014;5(3):2019–30. Available from: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/rgs/article/view/669/565 Accessed 10 Oct 2016.

Google Scholar  

Carneiro SAM. Saúde do trabalhador público: questão para a gestão de pessoas – a experiência na Prefeitura de São Paulo. Revista do Serviço Público. 2006;57(1):23–49. https://doi.org/10.21874/rsp.v57i1.188 (Accessed 10 Oct 2016).

Rebello CHB, Sortica MA. Exame Médico Periódico de Saúde [TCC on the Internet]. Santa Catarina: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina; 2000. Exame Médico Periódico de Saúde; [cited 2022 Jun 10]; Available from: https://repositorio.ufsc.br/bitstream/handle/123456789/104977/Exame%20medico%20periodico%20de%20saude.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Gasparini SM, Barreto SM, Assunção AA. O professor, as condições de trabalho e os efeitos sobre sua saúde. Educ Pesqui. 2005;31(2):189–99.

Permanent Commission and International Association on Occupational Health. Subcommittee on absenteeism: draft recommendations. Br J Ind Med. 1973;30(4):402–3. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.30.4.402 (Accessed 10 Oct 2016).

Hensing G, et al. How to measure sickness absence? Literature review and suggestion of five basic measures. Scand J Soc Med. 1998;26(2):133–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/14034948980260020201 (Accessed 10 Oct 2016).

Article   CAS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Ministério da Saúde (BR). Conselho Nacional de Saúde. Resolução nº 466, de 12 de dezembro de 2012. Aprova diretrizes e normas regulamentadoras de pesquisas envolvendo seres humanos. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde, 2012. Available from: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/saudelegis/cns/2013/res0466_12_12_2012.html . Accessed 10 Oct 2016.

Perícia médica do INSS: veja 10 principais dúvidas e respostas [Internet]. [place unknown]; 2021 Oct 06. Perícia médica do INSS: veja 10 principais dúvidas e respostas; [cited 2022 Jun 14]; Available from: https://motaadvocacia.com/10-perguntas-e-respostas-sobre-pericia-medica/ .

Mendes R. O impacto dos efeitos da ocupação sobre a saúde de trabalhadores: I. morbidade. Rev Saude Publica. 1988;22(4):311–26. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89101988000400007 Accessed 10 Oct 2016.

Oenning NSX, Carvalho FM, Lima VMC. Indicadores de absenteísmo e diagnósticos associados às licenças médicas de trabalhadores da área de serviços de uma indústria de petróleo. Revista Brasileira de Saúde Ocupacional. 2012;37(125):150–8. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0303-76572012000100018 ( Accessed 10 Oct 2016 ).

Organización Internacional del Trabajo (OIT). Absentismo: causa y control. In: Enciclopedia de salud y seguridad en el trabajo. Madrid: OIT, 1989, 1:5-12. Accessed 10 Oct 2016

National Audite Office. Managing Sickness Absencein the States of Guernsey. Report by the national audit office for the public accounts committee, 2006. Available from: https://gov.gg/CHttpHandler.ashx?id=5139&p=0 . Accessed 10 Oct 2016.

Mesa MFR, Kaempffer RAM. 30 años de estudio sobre ausentismo laboral en Chile: una perspectiva por tipos de empresas. Rev Med Chil. 2004;132(9):1100–8. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872004000900012 (Accessed 10 Oct 2016).

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Silva DMPP, Marziale MHP. Absenteísmo de trabalhadores de enfermagem em um hospital universitário. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2000;8(5):44–51. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692000000500007 (Accessed 10 Oct 2016).

Santos JP, Mattos AP. Absentismo-doença na prefeitura municipal de Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul. Brasil Revista Brasileira de Saúde Ocupacional. 2010;35(121):148–56. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0303-76572010000100016 (Accessed 10 Oct 2016).

Leão ALM. et al. Absenteísmo-doença no serviço público municipal de Goiânia. Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, 2015, 18(1): 262–77. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-5497201500010020 . Accessed 10 Oct 2016.

Sala A, et al. Licenças médicas entre trabalhadores da Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo no ano de 2004. Cad Saude Publica. 2009;25(10):2168–78. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2009001000008 (Accessed 10 Oct 2016).

Bedin B. Prevenção de acidentes sob a ótica de incentivos econômicos. 123f. Dissertação (mestrado) Universidade de Caxias do Sul, 2009.

World Health Organization. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2010. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.

Ministério da Saúde (BR). Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. Departamento de Análise de Situação de Saúde. Plano de Ações Estratégicas para o Enfrentamento das Doenças Crônicas Não Transmissíveis (DCNT) no Brasil 2011–2022. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde, 2011a. 160 p. Available from: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/plano_acoes_enfrent_dcnt_2011.pdf . Accessed 27 Jun 2022

Carmo EH, Barreto ML, Jarbas BSJ. Mudanças nos padrões de morbimortalidade da população brasileira: os desafios para um novo século. Epidemiol. Serv. Saúde [Internet]. 2003 Jun [citado 2022 Jun 27] ; 12( 2 ): 63–75. Available from: http://scielo.iec.gov.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1679-49742003000200002&lng=pt . Accessed 27 Jun 2022.

Abegunde DO, Mathers CD, Adam T, Ortegon M, Strong K. The burden and costs of chronic diseases in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet. 2007;370(9603):1929–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61696-1 (Accessed 27 Jun 2022).

Moura AAG, Carvalho EF, Silva NJC. Impacts of non-transmissible chronic diseases on social security benefits. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva. 2007; 12(6) Available from: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=63013517027 . Accessed 27 Jun 2022

Silva DO. Fatores associados à ocorrência e a duração dos afastamentos para tratamento da saúde em trabalhadores de uma Instituição Federal de Ensino Superior na Bahia [Dissertação]. Bahia: Universidade Federal da Bahia; 2010. Available from: https://repositorio.ufba.br/bitstream/ri/10324/1/77777777777777.pdf . Acessed 27 Jun 2022.

Sala A, Carro ARL, Correa AN, Seixas PHDA. Licenças médicas entre trabalhadores da Secretaria de Estado da Saúde de São Paulo no ano de 2004. Cad Saúde Pública. 2009;25(10):2168–78. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2009001000008 (Acessed 27 Jun 2022).

do Vale SF, Maciel RH, do Nascimento APT, Vasconcelos JWO, Pimentel FHP. Análise de diagnósticos associados às licenças médicas de servidores públicos do Ceará. revpsico, 2015;6(1):68–1. Available from: http://www.periodicos.ufc.br/psicologiaufc/article/view/1694 . Acessed 27 Jun 2022.

Cunha JB, Blank VLG, Boing AF. Tendência temporal de afastamento do trabalho em servidores públicos (1995–2005). Rev. bras. epidemiol., 2009; 12(2):226–236. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-790X2009000200012 . Acessed 27 Jun 2022.

Marangoni VSL, Neves ALM, Filho ZAS, Martins GC. Afastamento laboral por transtornos mentais entre os servidores da prefeitura municipal de Manaus: uma análise preliminar. Semina: Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, 2016;37(2):13–24. doi: https://doi.org/10.5433/1679-0367.2016v37n2p13 . Acessed 27 Jun 2022.

Andrade TB, et al. Prevalência de absenteísmo entre trabalhadores do serviço público. Scientia Medica. 2008;18(4):166–71. Available from https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/lil-503535 Accessed 10 Oct 2016.

Pawlina MMC, Campos AF de, Ribeiro LS. Características de absenteísmo entre trabalhadores da saúde: nível central da Secretaria de Estado de Saúde/MT de 2005 a 2006. PPP, 2022;(33). Disponível em: // www.ipea.gov.br/ppp/index.php/PPP/article/view/158 . Acessed 27 Jun 2022.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

This study was partially funded by the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel—Brazil (CAPES)—Financial Code 001. Funders have no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, publication decision or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Nurse. Master in Public Health, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Norte, Natal, Brazil

Lídia Maria Costa Araújo Magalhães

Nursing Student. Federal University of Rio Grande Do Norte, National Council Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), Natal, Brazil

Ketyllem Tayanne da Silva Costa & Gustavo Nepomuceno Capistrano

Nursing Student, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Norte, Natal, Brazil

Maryanna Damasceno Leal

Nurse. Doctor in Health Sciences. Post Graduate Program. Federal University of Rio Grande Do Norte, Natal, Brazil

Fábia Barbosa de Andrade

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

L.M.C.A.M. was the principal investigator of the project and responsible for administration, coordination, and funding acquisition. L.M.C.A.M. and F.B.A. were involved in conceptualization and in the study design. L.M.C.A.M. carried out the investigation. L.M.C.A.M., K.T.S.C., G.N.C. and M.D.L. were involved in formal analysis and data curation and wrote the main manuscript text. F.B.A. reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ketyllem Tayanne da Silva Costa .

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate.

This project was submitted to the Research Ethics Committee of Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte where it was appraised and subsequently approved under opinion no. 1.707.691, from the principles of ethical and legal aspects that govern scientific research on human beings, as recommended by Resolution no. 466/12 [ 8 ], and the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

Competing interests.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Magalhães, L.M.C.A., Silva Costa, K.T., Capistrano, G.N. et al. A study on occupational health and safety. BMC Public Health 22 , 2186 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14584-w

Download citation

Received : 05 April 2022

Accepted : 09 November 2022

Published : 25 November 2022

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14584-w

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Occupational health
• Occupational health services
• Surveillance
• Workers health

BMC Public Health

ISSN: 1471-2458

• General enquiries: [email protected]

A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

A lock ( ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

• About NIOSH
• NIOSH Centers
• Federal Register Notices
• Board of Scientific Counselors
• Training and Workforce Development
• View All Home

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

• About Program Portfolio This page provides background information on the NIOSH Program Portfolio.
• NIOSH Publications and Products Search the NIOSHTIC-2 bibliographic database for all NIOSH-supported research publications and produ...
• NIOSH Newsroom NIOSH Newsroom contains links to Press Releases, Updates and Features
• NIOSH Science Blog
• Meetings and Events
• Data and Statistics Gateway

New and Featured

Top Resources

• Peer Review Agenda
• NIOSH eNews

• Residency/Fellowship Program
• Grand Rounds
• Continuing Medical Education
• MPH in Occupational and Environmental Medicine
• Occupational and Environmental Clinic at Harborview
• Risk communication consultations
• Pediatric Environmental Health Specialty Unit

Research and projects

Occupational and environmental medicine research contributes toward a scientific basis for policies, guidelines and best practices that lead to improved occupational health and well-being.

Our researchers focus on understanding the relationship between exposure and disease, evaluating clinical and population health interventions and providing scientific information to support decisions for workers, employers, policymakers, regulatory bodies and health care providers and institutions.

Current research areas include precarious work and stress, occupational health effects of climate-related hazards, air pollution and cardiovascular disease, work-related musculoskeletal disorders and injuries, occupational lung disease, occupational infectious diseases and the health and safety of animal workers.

Dr. June Spector's research focuses on the prevention and management of adverse health outcomes from climate-related hazards in working populations. She is also actively engaged in interdisciplinary research to evaluate health benefits of conservation interventions. Dr. Spector is currently conducting a study, funded by the National Institute for Occupational Health and Safety, that is working with workers, growers and other stakeholders to develop and evaluate a multilevel approach to the prevention of adverse health effects of heat exposure for agricultural workers. Dr. Spector's publications can be found here .

Dr. Joel Kaufman is an international authority on air pollution and cardiovascular disease. He leads the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis and Air Pollution (MESA Air) project, which examines the relationship between air pollution exposures and the progression of cardiovascular disease over time. He is the principal investigator on a large study that investigates the relationship between air pollutants and cardiovascular risk with pooled cohorts. Dr. Kaufman is an elected member of the Washington State Academy of Sciences. Dr. Kaufman's publications can be found here .

Dr. Peter Rabinowitz directs the UW Center for One Health Research. The center explores linkages between human, animal and environmental health in a "One Health" paradigm, including zoonotic infectious diseases at the human-animal interface, animals as "sentinels" of environmental health hazards and clinical collaboration between human health care providers and veterinarians in a species-spanning approach. A goal of the center is to serve as an incubator and organizer of research, training and clinical activities at the University of Washington related to the human-animal-ecosystem interface. Dr. Rabinowitz's publications can be found here .

Dr. Cora Sack's research focuses on occupational and environmental pulmonary disease. Her research centers on epidemiologic, controlled exposure and translational studies on the cardiopulmonary effects of air pollution exposure. Dr. Sack is the recipient of a NIH K23 award through the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences that aims to assess the role of airway morphology as an effect modifier in environmental lung disease. Dr. Sack's publications can be found here .

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• HHS Author Manuscripts
• PMC10111360

Measuring the benefits of occupational safety and health research with economic metrics: Insights from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

P. timothy bushnell.

1 Office of the Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA

Regina Pana-Cryan

2 Office of the Director, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Washington, DC, USA

John Howard

3 Economic Research and Support Office, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Washington, DC, USA

Tapas K. Ray

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Associated Data

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Measuring the ultimate impact of research on health and economic well-being has presented challenges that have rarely been surmounted, and research on preventing occupational injuries and illnesses is no exception. Nevertheless, there is an increasing need to demonstrate the value of publicly funded research. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) recently contracted with the RAND Corporation to conduct six in-depth case studies that aimed to quantify the benefits of key NIOSH research efforts using economic metrics. These case studies focused on silica exposure in asphalt pavement milling, firefighter cancer risks, a multi-industry matching-grant program for purchase of safety equipment, personal coal dust monitors for coal miners, redesign of ambulance patient compartments for safety, and workplace amputation surveillance. In this article, we summarize what we learned about how measurement of research benefits may be pursued. We summarize the benefit measurement methods that were used and the results of these research efforts in terms of costs saved, injuries and illnesses prevented, and the statistical value of reductions in risk of death or illness. We then distill some observations about the characteristics of research efforts that make measurement of research benefits feasible and suggest steps that could make it feasible to apply the same methods more widely. We also outline key NIOSH activities that appear not to be amenable to benefit measurement but suggest potentials for progress toward at least partial or qualitative benefit assessment. Finally, we discuss implications of the benefit measurement case studies for strategic research planning.

1 |. INTRODUCTION

It is notoriously difficult to measure the benefits of research for several reasons. The knowledge that new research produces enters into and combines with a larger pool of existing knowledge. And if the research produces new, actionable information, that information is only part of what decision-makers consider as they respond to complex incentives and organizational and market environments. The new information from research may also be put into practice in varied ways by numerous, mostly private parties whose actions are often undocumented. Sometimes as well, it is uncertain what share of the products of research should be credited to research versus the learning from practical experience it built upon.

Nevertheless, there is an increasing need to demonstrate the value of publicly funded research that promises to improve the safety, health, and well-being of workers. Conducting this type of applied research is the mission of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). To help address the need to demonstrate the value of its research, NIOSH recently contracted with RAND to conduct six, in-depth, case studies that aimed to quantify the benefits of key NIOSH research efforts using economic metrics. We summarize what we learned from these case studies and how this can help expand and improve future assessments of NIOSH research, as well as contribute to strategic research planning and translation of research into practice. Some of these lessons should apply to assessment and planning of prevention research by other organizations as well.

We begin with a brief overview of some notable prior efforts to measure the economic benefits of research, identifying those that are most applicable to NIOSH research. We then provide an overview of the subjects and results of the RAND case studies. Following this, we summarize and provide insights on the methods used to conduct the case studies, both on a general and on a more detailed level. This provides a guide to conducting future case studies. Because one of the steps in conducting the case studies is verifying and assessing the role of NIOSH research in reducing injury and illness outcomes, we next highlight the indispensable contributions to these reductions made by other stakeholders. Next, we address the central issue of feasibility of measuring research benefits by identifying the main features of the six case study subjects that made them feasible. We also discuss ways to address the barriers to feasibility for other, potential subjects of case studies. Finally, we outline additional ways to apply what we learned from the case studies to project and strategic planning.

2 |. PREVIOUS STUDIES MEASURING BENEFITS OF RESEARCH

NIOSH has previously undertaken many program evaluations that identify research impacts. A major advance in these efforts was the commissioning of a series of monograph reports from National Academies of Sciences expert review panels, in 2005–2008. 1 Each report summarized a program’s achievements and evaluated the relevance and apparent impact of research in a qualitative way, yielding recommendations for improvement. Later, NIOSH conducted a series of program evaluations using a framework called contribution analysis. 2 These evaluations documented how NIOSH research outputs were received, adopted, or translated into practice by intermediaries (e.g., professional and trade associations or equipment manufacturers) and end users (e.g., employers and workers). The logic of how this use of information should result in fewer illnesses and injuries was then articulated. However, the evaluators did not attempt to quantify impacts due to lack of sufficient data. NIOSH’s counterpart in Ontario Canada, the Institute for Work and Health, has similarly focused on documenting how its research has been used by other parties in a series of very brief case studies, but has not generally been able to document and quantify impacts on worker injury and illness. 3 , 4

We must therefore look outside NIOSH and the field of occupational safety and health to find relevant, previous efforts to quantify the benefits of research with economic metrics. We begin with discussion of a landmark study that pointed to the paucity of such efforts. Following this, we describe several sets of studies that provide partially applicable models for measuring benefits of NIOSH research and highlight the distinguishing characteristics of the NIOSH-sponsored RAND studies.

In 2011, Congress directed the National Research Council (NRC) to produce a study to develop improved impact-on-society metrics for research, with special emphasis on federally supported research. 5 A notable part of its statement of task was to “review and synthesize the broad variety of efforts to assess research output and impacts in industry and government,” and to “explore various methodological approaches to measurement of research quality, productivity, and impact, including those that help to quantify the return on investment of research.” Thus, the NRC cast its net broadly. In so doing, it cited most of the notable, previous efforts to quantify benefits of research with economic metrics that are most relevant to NIOSH’s recent efforts.

The NRC report observed that government-wide tools for measuring research performance, such as the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) and the Program Assessment Rating Tool focus on measuring short-term outputs rather than long-term outcomes. Furthermore, they cited the findings of another major report that surveyed 20 existing and proposed frameworks and tools for evaluating research, but concluded that these approaches do not address the fundamental question that NRC was concerned with: What would have happened without the research funding program? Without the answer, the true impact remains unknown.

The NRC report also discusses evaluations of programs at the National Science Foundation (NSF) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The NRC states that the descriptive statistics and case studies in the NSF program evaluations “rarely yield insights valuable for measuring impact.”

The NRC report did not summarize the character of the NIH program evaluations in a similar way, but descriptions of them are available on NIH evaluation websites. 6 – 9 The evaluations encompass a rich range of methodologies and metrics adapted to specific programs, but appear to be aimed mainly at providing guidance for managing the programs, rather than producing quantitative estimates of ultimate program impact. A report on the website of the NIH Office for Evaluation, Performance and Reporting 9 provides an ambitious set of guidelines for future development of capacity to “systematically, comprehensively, dynamically, and strategically” assess the value of biomedical research. 10 However, the report also explains the great challenges to realizing this vision by detailing the difficulties involved in tracing the impacts of biomedical research ranging from basic science, through many stages of development, to widespread application, and normally involving contributions by a host of other parties. It is these challenges that appear to motivate the overall thrust of the NRC report itself, which steers away from a central focus on summary metrics to instead emphasize the importance of further developing understanding of the complexity of the scientific research and innovation system to improve its performance.

We should briefly note another government-wide initiative that will promote and require more evaluation of government programs that was undertaken since the appearance of the NRC report: the Foundations for Evidence-Based Policymaking Act of 2018 (“Evidence Act” Pub. L. No. 115–435, 132 Stat. 5529), signed into law on January 14, 2019. While agencies may pursue any type of evaluation that is appropriate to their activities, there is explicit focus on the plans and processes for gathering data to support evaluations, and on selection and development of evaluation methods, suggesting that there will be more emphasis on longer term outcomes. 11

Some of the best-known quantitative studies of the impacts of research have been conducted on a broad societal or industrywide level. This contrasts with the NIOSH-sponsored case studies, which required evidence on the connections between specific research efforts and outcomes. However, these aggregate-level studies are worth taking note of, because they have been highly influential in making the general case for the possibility of measurement of research benefits with economic metrics, and because some of their features provide partial models for evaluating NIOSH research. A seminal paper by Murphy and Topel (2003) compared the value of the overall increase in longevity in the United States in 1970–1998, net of increases in health care costs, to the total cost of public and private medical R&D. 12 Because the R&D costs were far smaller than the net value of increased longevity (less than 3%) and since the decline in mortality rates appears to be due in significant part to research-based innovations in health care, they concluded that benefits of medical R&D were likely much larger than the costs. Another paper in the same volume by Cutler and Kadiyala (2003) examined the causes of recent declines in cardiovascular mortality and divided them into three, similarly sized groups (behavioral change, pharmaceuticals, and invasive procedures). 13 Based on attributing all three of these sources to research (and including research dissemination costs in research costs), they estimated that research on behavioral risks had about a 30 to 1 benefit-cost ratio and that research related to technology improvement had a 4 to 1 benefit-cost ratio.

Another body of literature examines the relationship between the dollar amount of R&D investment and total sales or stock market value in a variety of industries to estimate a financial rate of return to R&D (ROI). 5 , 14 , 15 In contrast to increased length of life and reduced mortality, total sales and stock market value measure benefits in ways that relate to gains of private firms and only indirectly and imperfectly represent benefits to society. But similar to the society-level health research studies, this literature examines research impacts on an aggregate level, avoiding attempts to determine the connections between specific research efforts and outcomes. In studies of the relationship between R&D and economic outcomes at the firm level, it has been assumed that the firm undertakes R&D to benefit its own bottom line, enabling the statistical relationship between R&D investment and economic outcomes to be plausibly interpreted as causal. Since much of the knowledge produced by firm-level R&D eventually becomes useful to other competitors in an industry, studies have also examined the relationship between R&D and economic outcomes on the industry level. Hall and colleagues (2014) have observed that early studies in this line of research, mostly done in the early 1980s, estimated rates of return to R&D of 15% to 100% and have provided a prominent support for funding of private and public research well into the 21st century. 15

ROI research has proved particularly useful for support of public agricultural research. Analyses have related agricultural sector productivity to the total dollars spent on private and public agricultural research. More recent analyses have focused on the specific roles of private versus public research, generally finding that they are complementary in promoting productivity. 16 Some studies have taken account of factors facilitating research transfer to practice, including the role of agricultural extension services and education, as well as road infrastructure, to estimate the impact of public R&D spending on productivity growth in the sector. The literature has found rates of return of 20%–60% and benefit-cost ratios of between 10 and 20 to 1. 16 As in the domain of health, it is important to note that these studies have been enabled by the evident fact that research supported by the public sector has accounted for a large, if uncertain, share of increases in agricultural productivity. While large agricultural input firms and others have made important contributions, individual farms have few incentives to drive productivity growth in the industry with their own research.

Studies that relate dollar amounts of R&D funding to aggregate, economic outcomes on the societal, industry, or firm level can provide compelling evidence of the overall value of research, but this avenue is not open to us in the field of occupational safety and health research for at least three main reasons. First, even though we could substitute safety and health outcomes for economic outcomes to perform an aggregate analysis, we lack data needed to estimate changes over time in occupational safety and health outcomes and research investments. We have reasonable data on injury rates showing a long-term decline that has been dramatic, but we lack similar data on change in rates of occupational illnesses. Individual occupational illness cases are not usually documented, and our estimates of their incidence are based on the estimated work-attributable fraction of the overall incidence of these illnesses, the changes in which have been driven mainly by factors outside the workplace. 17 Data might possibly be assembled on the history of occupational safety and health investments, but this is a challenging task that has not been undertaken.

The second reason that aggregate R&D investment benefit studies are not feasible in occupational safety and health is that we do not have a basis for starting with a clear presumption that new research-based knowledge has had a major impact on safety and health, even if this is so. It is not evident how much research-based guidance has influenced practice. There are many channels through which such influence takes place, including unions, trade groups, business periodicals, conferences, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) consultation service providers, safety and health consultants, and safety and health professionals working at employers and in workers compensation insurers, but the general level of effectiveness of this array of parties in research translation is unknown. Furthermore, it has been very difficult to independently track guidance implementation, since much of the guidance can be implemented by alteration of everyday practice, without being marked by installation of new technology. Thus, it is not surprising that there are no mechanisms to gather implementation information in a consistent way over time in a large and enormously varied population of workplaces.

A third reason why aggregate analysis is not a viable option is that any observed statistical association between R&D and safety and health outcomes would be affected by other major factors, especially general trends in awareness and value of safety, technology, and management changes unrelated to safety, and changes in incentives to avert costs of injury and illness, and perhaps others. These factors are very difficult to measure, especially on an aggregate level, with changes differing by sector. Without a pre-existing presumption that research has had major impacts on safety and health, and without a reasonable way to measure other known factors, we may neither detect nor confidently interpret any aggregate statistical association between R&D investment and safety and health outcomes.

Given the lack of viability of measuring impacts of occupational safety and health research on the aggregate societal or industry level, we must look to examples of previous, research-benefit research that rely on tracing the specific connections between research, practice, and ultimate outcomes. Two of the best examples are sets of analyses sponsored by the Department of Energy and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) of the Commerce Department. The DOE’s Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) program has produced six economic benefit studies of its research. 18 An example is an evaluation of the HVAC, Water Heating, and Appliance program. 19 Three research efforts within this program were selected, presumably based on the expected size of their contribution to benefits. The total benefits for these three efforts were compared to the total costs of the entire research portfolio in this program. Benefit estimates were based on a set of 91 interviews with experts who were asked to estimate what trends in energy efficiency would have been in the absence of DOE EERE research. Fuel and energy savings were translated into cost savings, and some additional health benefits from reduced air pollution were calculated using an EPA model. Benefit-cost ratios of 20–66 were estimated.

NIST produced a series of 17 economic impact analyses focused on specific research programs involving calibration, testing, and standards. Link and Scott (2012) provide summaries of these analyses produced between 1997 and 2009. 20 One example focuses on a thermocouple program. Thermocouples are devices for measuring temperature and are used in processes that require fine temperature control. Ten industrial users of thermocouples and seven-wire suppliers to thermocouple manufacturers were surveyed. The wire suppliers, similar to the DOE HVAC and appliance study, were asked to estimate the likely future time path of costs if NIST were to cease production of its “reference tables and functions, test methods, and calibration services.” These counterfactual costs were expected to arise from use of foreign laboratories, the gradual formation of an alternative private consortium to provide substitute standards and services, and the need to hire additional personnel or consultants to replace telephone consultations with NIST. Benefits to the users of more accurate thermocouples were judged to be even more important, but could not be estimated since they are not reducible to a set of cost savings, but instead take the form of fewer quality problems in production and higher customer satisfaction with end products.

Another NIST example is an evaluation of research on combinatorial methods for rapid analysis of large numbers of related chemical samples. The evaluation focused on the period 1998–2007 and relied on semi-structured interviews and surveys, reaching over 70 scientists from companies representing over 70% of total R&D spending among those who use combinatorial methods in the key, relevant industries. 21 Total costs included not just NIST research, but membership and project costs of firms who joined a public-private research consortium set up to develop and disseminate the new methods. Costs also included purchases of NIST technology by private firms. The estimated benefits were due to improved efficiency of research in private firms. As with the previous example, benefits to end users of products based on the research could not be quantified.

The most important feature of the DOE and NIST examples is that they provide models for estimating impacts of research activities through consultation with experts who can estimate what would have happened in the absence of specific research results. This was also an important part of the methods of the RAND case studies (see Section 4.4 below on counterfactual scenarios).

The CDC has set forth methods for estimating effectiveness of public health prevention measures that also provide a partial precedent and model for the NIOSH-sponsored case studies. 22 , 23 Like the DOE, NIST, and NIOSH-sponsored studies, CDC prevention effectiveness studies trace the impact of specific technologies and actions on outcomes, but more similar to the NIOSH-sponsored studies, they focus on population health outcomes. On the other hand, unlike the DOE, NIST, and NIOSH-sponsored studies, they focus on the implementation and impact of prevention measures without concern for whether research was responsible. Many CDC studies of prevention effectiveness are included in lists of publications by participants in the CDC Prevention Effectiveness Fellowship program. 24 These studies frequently focus on effectiveness of screening programs, vaccines, treatments, and education for self-care and risk reduction. Some recent notable examples include studies of costs and benefits of outreach to install smoke alarms in high-risk communities, 25 the cost-effectiveness of education and contact-tracing programs to prevent sexually transmitted disease, 26 the health and healthcare cost impacts of referring patients with poorly control hypertension to team care involving pharmacists, 27 and a review of the cost-effectiveness studies of adult vaccines. 28 These kinds of studies usually focus on prevention measures applied directly to individuals within broadly defined populations by healthcare providers or community public health programs. This is likely to make it easier to gather information on the number of the individuals affected by the implementation of prevention measures than in the occupational setting where prevention measures are usually implemented privately by employers and applied only to individuals engaged in very specific kinds of tasks.

The CDC and other agencies that focus on improvement of health have developed the economic metrics needed for translation of injury and illness reductions into dollar amounts. Both CDC prevention effectiveness studies and the NIOSH-sponsored case studies measure benefits in terms of (1) saved costs of illnesses and injuries averted in terms of medical costs and lost productivity, and (2) the statistical value of lives saved or illnesses averted based on values from willingness-to-pay (WTP) studies. The first metric, known as “cost-of-illness,” is well developed, having been demonstrated by Rice (1985) 29 and later employed by Leigh (2011) 30 to construct estimates of the economic costs of occupational injury and illness at the national level. WTP metrics are also well-developed and are routinely used in the federal government to estimate the value of regulations designed to prevent illness and death. Both types of metric are summarized in Haddix et al. (2003). 22 When these methods are applied to CDC interventions and occupational injury and illness research, they require data specific to particular injury and illness types. This contrasts with the simpler data requirements of the aggregate, society, and industry-level studies discussed above that measured impact in terms of reduced mortality and increased length of life.

In sum, the NIOSH-sponsored RAND case studies represent unusual efforts to measure the benefits of research with economic metrics. The DOE, NIST, and CDC prevention effectiveness studies provide the best precedents and models for these NIOSH studies. However, the NIOSH case studies employ a unique combination of methods and challenges.

3 |. THE RAND STUDIES AND THEIR RESULTS

Responding to the increasing need for government agencies to demonstrate value added by their activities, NIOSH contracted with the RAND Corporation in 2017 to conduct an initial set of three case studies of the economic benefits of NIOSH research. 31 NIOSH has been tracking the impacts of its research, mostly through the use of “intermediate outcomes.” Intermediate outcomes is a term used in logic models to signify “actions by stakeholders in response to NIOSH products or efforts.” 2 This can take a wide variety of forms, including citations of NIOSH research by other researchers, further dissemination and adaptation of NIOSH guidance, or most importantly, implementation of prevention measures in the workplace. However, NIOSH has infrequently been able to estimate the number of illnesses and injuries prevented by even its best-known, successful efforts. Clearly, there are data and analytical obstacles to obtaining such estimates. With assistance from RAND, we were able to devote concentrated attention to this problem and develop estimation methods that could overcome these obstacles.

RAND worked cooperatively with NIOSH economists to identify the subjects of the first three case studies. Because NIOSH had not conducted such economic-benefit case studies before, we needed to determine and demonstrate the best methods to use. We also recognized that we needed to start with case studies that appeared to have substantial impacts, at least in terms of having achieved intermediate outcomes. In addition, we needed to have access to data with which we could quantitatively assess both intermediate and injury and illness outcomes. NIOSH economists reviewed NIOSH reports and presentations and queried colleagues to identify such potential case studies and provided a menu of options which RAND researchers evaluated according to their own criteria.

The first of the three selected case studies focused on the design of dust controls for large asphalt milling machines, which are used to remove damaged pavement layers in preparation for resurfacing. Milling machine manufacturers ultimately incorporated these controls in all new large milling machines, thus reducing exposure to silica-containing milling dust and promising to reduce silicosis, lung cancer, and other lung diseases. The second case study focused on a major epidemiological research study that provided the first, widely compelling evidence of elevated rates of cancer among firefighters in the United States, spurring a cultural shift in the industry and leading to widespread adoption of new guidelines for reducing firefighter exposure to carcinogens found in smoke, fumes, and soot. NIOSH actively disseminated the findings and participated in formulation of the new guidelines, which focused mainly on new practices and use of existing technologies, particularly use of self-contained, breathing apparatuses during additional phases of the work, and various cleaning, containment, and positioning practices to avoid respiratory and dermal exposures. The third case study focused on an assessment of the effectiveness of an Ohio Bureau of Workers’ Compensation (OHBWC) program that provided matching grants to employers investing in a wide variety of safety equipment. The NIOSH research showing resulting declines in injury rates led to a major expansion of the program, which inspired similar programs in two other states.

Because the first three case studies were successful in using economic metrics to assess the benefits of NIOSH research, NIOSH contracted with RAND again, late in 2018, for another set of three case studies. 32 To select these case studies, NIOSH developed a menu of ten potential case studies. RAND ranked these ten by several criteria, and RAND and NIOSH then agreed on the three final selections. The leading criteria were the presence of an apparent, substantial impact and the feasibility of quantitatively measuring that impact. Another major criterion was the diversity of case study characteristics such as type of research and industry, because this would help to further develop insight into the challenges of, and methods for quantitatively assessing economic benefits.

The first case study of this second set focused on the development of a personal dust monitor (PDM) for use by underground coal miners. The use of these monitors was enforced throughout the industry as part of a new Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) coal mine dust rule. 33 The monitors were designed to provide continuous, real-time readings that were useful in alerting miners to the need to fix ventilation systems problems and to reposition themselves to avoid dust. The second case study focused on the development of safer patient compartments in the rear of ambulances that provide new, more practical passenger restraints and reduce the likelihood of impacts with flying and fixed interior objects during collisions, sudden stops, starts, and swerves. Ambulance purchasing standards in almost all states incorporated the new designs. The third case study focused on the development of a system in Michigan for surveillance of work incidents resulting in an amputation (usually finger amputation). The system developers have been providing this information to the Michigan Occupational Safety and Health Administration (MIOSHA), which has been using it to target inspections. These inspections revealed that many of the workplaces where amputations had taken place had not controlled the hazards associated with these amputations.

Table 1 provides a summary of basic results for all six case studies. The principal monetary results are in the third column, which reports the averted burden on society due to the prevention of illness and injury. RAND chose to focus on annualized benefits measured in dollars to facilitate the comparison of the magnitude of benefits among case studies. The case studies varied widely in the number of years over which benefits were estimated, as reported in the fourth column. A key reason for this was that changes in exposures often take many years to have their full effect on worker health, while in other case studies involving injury, prevention measures are effective as soon as they are fully implemented. Note that due to the lack of adequate information, RAND was unable to estimate some categories or types of benefits. The last column of the table lists some of these important but omitted benefits.

Results of RAND case studies on benefits of NIOSH research

Note : Annualized figures represent conversion of a varying stream of estimated dollar values over the time horizon of the analysis into an equivalent, constant stream of unchanging annual values with the same total present value, using a discount rate to represent the lower value of benefits received further in the future. Ranges for estimated benefits are based on alternative assumptions and discount rates (3% and 7%). WTP values are willingness-to-pay values, as explained in the text. Dollar figures for asphalt milling and firefighter case studies in 2016 dollars, for safety grant case study in 2013–2017 dollars, and for PDM and ambulance redesign case studies in 2018 dollars.

Abbreviations: NIOSH, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; NMRD, nonmalignant respiratory disease; OSHA, Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

Source : Miller et al. (2017, 2020). 31 , 32

What do these results suggest, and what conclusions might we draw? The first, most basic observation is that these case studies successfully constructed estimates of benefits expressed in terms of economic metrics. Thus, we demonstrated that, for at least some selected research efforts, economic benefits can indeed be estimated. Second, most of the case studies generated estimates of lives saved and nonfatal injuries or illnesses prevented, which are additional and usually unavailable basic metrics of impact. This lends concreteness to the results of NIOSH research efforts that have already been widely recognized as successful. Third, the estimates come with substantial uncertainties as represented by the wide ranges that were based on calculations with alternative assumptions. Fourth, despite uncertainty in the estimates, they still serve to differentiate the scale of benefits achieved by different research efforts. This could be helpful in setting research priorities.

Fifth, by design, the monetary economic benefit estimates are expressed with two different and widely accepted metrics. 22 The first method assesses reduction in medical costs and productivity losses resulting from worker injury and illness. This method uses directly observable medical costs and the number of workdays missed due to absenteeism, disability, and death. It is the most commonly used method and less dependent on complex statistical analysis and assumptions than the second method. The second method uses assessments of “willingness-to-pay (WTP)” to reduce risk of fatalities and nonfatal injuries and illnesses, based on a body of literature on how much individuals are willing to pay for reductions of risk. This method is required for cost–benefit analyses included in government regulations. Its strength is that it assesses the value of avoiding the experience of suffering and of preventing death. The difference between the emphasis on observable costs in the first method and the emphasis on a more holistic approach in the second method results in a large difference in the scale of benefits derived by each method.

Our sixth observation is that, as previously mentioned and shown in Table 1 , not all the benefits of each case study were included in the estimates. Such omissions are generally due to lack of data, which is a common problem that clearly leads to some downward bias in the benefit estimates.

Our seventh observation is that some of the economic benefits demonstrated by the case studies are larger than the annual NIOSH research budget and the research costs associated with each case study. In 2019, for example, the NIOSH budget was 336 million dollars. While NIOSH research costs were not fully estimated for all of these case studies and were not part of RAND’s estimates, they generally ranged from a total of 100,000 or 200,000 up to 2 or 3 million dollars over multiple years. This immediately suggests that NIOSH research is well worth the investment. It also leads us to the eighth observation, which is that the NIOSH cost does not reflect the full cost of achieving these benefits. The full cost would include costs of other organizations who disseminated NIOSH research results and the organizations and employers who purchased or used internal resources to implement preventive measures. The case studies did not include prevention costs, largely because information on costs of organizations outside NIOSH periods that may span several years is difficult to collect. This information might possibly be collected in the future to create a more complete picture of costs and benefits.

4 |. SUMMARY OF RAND CASE STUDY METHODS

In general, RAND took the following steps to estimate the benefits of NIOSH research:

Step 1. Establish a timeline of NIOSH activities and outputs, and significant stakeholder activities and actions.

Step 2. Estimate the reduction in illness or injury due to prevention actions associated with the research.

Step 3. Estimate the monetary value of averted injuries or illnesses.

Step 4. Estimate the probable net effect of NIOSH research by estimating the reductions in injuries, illnesses, and their costs that might have occurred in the absence of NIOSH research.

The first step, establishing a timeline of NIOSH activities and stakeholder actions, defines the scope of activities the case study includes. Further, the timeline provides an integrated view of NIOSH and stakeholder actions. This helps us to identify the significant stakeholder actions that preceded and followed NIOSH actions, and to understand the potential relationships between research outputs and the actions they may have informed or inspired. The second step, estimating the reduction in injuries and illness, is the heart of the challenge in conducting a case study, sometimes requiring creative use of available data, as well as careful use of informed assumptions. This step requires estimating the extent to which prevention measures are implemented and estimating their effectiveness. The third step, assigning monetary value to averted injuries and illnesses, follows more standard methods that are not as specific to a case study but do require information specific to certain injuries or conditions that is sometimes difficult to obtain. The final step, estimating what would have occurred in the absence of NIOSH, is based on expert judgment and is necessary for arriving at a reasonable estimate of benefits that can be attributed to NIOSH research. We should also note that an additional step was taken in one of the injury case studies (safety grants). In this step, productivity changes stemming directly from the prevention measures themselves, rather than their health and safety impacts were added to the tally of benefits.

Out of the six case studies, three focused on illnesses and three focused on injuries. After all case studies were completed, we were able to recognize that illness and injury case studies generally required somewhat different approaches for Step 2, estimating the reduction in illness or injury. Next, we separately review in more detail how the reductions in illnesses and injuries were estimated. Following that, we discuss the details of Steps 3 and 4.

4.1 |. Illness case studies: Estimating the reduction in illnesses

The three case studies that focused on illnesses focused on asphalt milling, firefighter cancer, and PDMs. Table 2 summarizes the steps taken to estimate the reduction in illnesses. Steps of the estimation method are listed across the top—one column for each step. While this method consists of three general steps, there were significant variations among the three case studies in the strategies required to carry out these steps, as the discussion below will explain.

Illness case studies: Steps taken to estimate reduction in illnesses (information sources and estimation methods)

Abbreviations: MSHA, Mine Safety and Health Administration; NIOSH, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; OSHA, Occupational Safety and Health Administration; PDM, personal dust monitor.

In Step 2a, RAND estimated the size of the population to which the prevention was applied. This estimation can be viewed as breaking down into two parts: estimating the size of the target population of the relevant prevention measure, and then estimating the percentage of this population for which the prevention measure was actually implemented.

The asphalt milling prevention measure targeted those who operate large milling machines. This occupational group is too small and specific to be captured in standard government surveys. OSHA had obtained an estimate of the population of workers who use pavement milling machines of any size for the analysis supporting its silica rule. 34 , 35 The share of these workers who used large machines was estimated based on OSHA’s estimate of the percentage of milling machines in each size class, combined with expert judgment about average crew sizes for each machine size. Because the new prevention measure was a technology built into all new, large milling machines, RAND could assume that 100% of large milling machine operators would benefit from exposure reduction after a certain number of years.

The firefighter population was large and of known size, but RAND had to estimate the proportion of that population working in departments that implemented the new recommended prevention measures, and how fully these departments actually implemented them. In the absence of actual data, RAND used expert judgment to estimate these parameters and sensitivity analysis to cope with the uncertainty. Expert judgment was based on the fact that a large proportion of fire departments participate in events and activities of national firefighting organizations which serve as a major source of authoritative firefighting information. Another uncertainty was the extent to which the new prevention measures would benefit volunteer firefighters. RAND had limited information on their cancer risks and their fire departments’ rates of adoption. Thus, they did not include these firefighters in the analysis.

The underground coal miner population was similarly large and of known size. RAND also knew that implementation rates were close to 100% because use of the new PDM technology was required by MSHA’s recent coal dust rule implemented in 2016. 33

In Step 2b, RAND estimated the reduction in exposure due to the prevention measures. This is an exposure to a substance or a set of substances that can be summarized by a single number, and which, in a later step, can be linked to a rate of illness. This is a step that only applied to the illness case studies, since in the injury case studies, there was no such summary exposure measurement available, and impact of prevention measures on injury outcomes had to be estimated directly, as explained below. While all three illness case studies estimated a reduction in exposure, each of them required a different strategy to accomplish this.

This step was easiest in the asphalt milling case study, because we could compare results from engineering tests of exposures with the new controls with previous surveillance study measurements of silica exposure without the new controls. The previous surveillance studies had been part of NIOSH-supported efforts to document previously under-recognized exposures to silica in a range of construction tasks.

In the firefighter cancer case study, we had to rely on expert judgment. This was not simple. First, research industrial hygienists estimated the share of several routes of exposure to combustion byproducts. Then, these experts estimated the percentage by which exposure via each route was reduced by the newly applied prevention recommendations. The experts used insights and data from their field research to develop these estimates. The detailed rationale the experts followed to develop these estimates are included as an appendix in the RAND report.

In the PDM case study, the biggest challenge was using MSHA coal mine inspection data to determine the effectiveness of using the PDM. By luck, MSHA required the use of PDMs 6 months before other requirements of the new coal dust rule came into effect. Thus, this 6-month period promised to reveal the decrease in exposure due only to the new PDM. However, inspection samples were collected for a mix of occupations and work locations that was continually shifting over time, and exposures exhibited strong seasonality. Therefore, much statistical work had to be done to detect the PDM impact on exposure.

After completing Steps 2a and 2b, the basic approach for estimating the resulting decrease in illnesses in Step 2c was straightforward in all three case studies. This involved applying existing quantitative analyses of the relationship of exposure level to disease risk. This is also a step that was unique to the illness case studies, since there were no studies relating an exposure measure to rates of injury outcome. In the asphalt milling and PDM case studies, these analyses had already been identified and synthesized as part of the benefit-cost assessments that are required for implementing new OSHA or MSHA rules. In the firefighter cancer case study, the estimate of the risk of cancer due to firefighter exposures came from the NIOSH research that estimated this risk and was the central focus of the case study. The percent reduction in excess risk was assumed equal to percent reduction in exposure.

4.2 |. Injury case studies: Estimating the reduction in injuries

The three injury case studies focused on safety grants, ambulance redesign, and amputations. As with the illness case studies, the three injury case studies represented a significant degree of diversity, leading in turn to significant diversity in methods used, even though they follow the general steps listed above for injury case studies. Table 3 summarizes the steps taken to estimate the reduction in injuries.

Injury case studies: Steps taken to estimate reduction in injuries (information sources and estimation methods)

Abbreviation: NIOSH, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; OSHA, Occupational Safety and Health Administration.

Step 2a involved estimating the injury rate or injury cost rate in the population to which the prevention was applied. Note that the injury case studies did not focus on measuring exposure as the illness case studies did. The illness case studies focused on exposure to a single substance or to a single source of harmful substances that is considered to be the main illness risk, and this exposure could be measured quantitatively by a single, continuous variable. In the injury case studies, the source of injury risk is not reducible to a single exposure, and usually includes many factors related to equipment, work environment, workload, materials, management, worker behavior, and a host of specific circumstances. As a result, the risk of injury is usually defined by the rate of injury outcomes for workers in a particular task or occupation—that is, the rate of injury or the rate of cost for injury, per worker and per unit of time. In two of the three injury case studies, it was possible to estimate the rate of injury or injury cost in the relevant population, although using different strategies to do so.

In the safety grants case study, the cost of injuries was estimated for the population of workers affected by the grants. While the workers’ compensation insurer could estimate this number using grant program records, it would be available with a time lag. Therefore, RAND used a simple approximation instead. First, they calculated the share of the safety grant worker population in the state’s total insured population. Then, they applied this share to the state’s total workers’ compensation claim costs and derived an estimate of the workers’ compensation claim costs attributable to the workers benefiting from the safety grants.

In the ambulance redesign case study, RAND extracted the number of injuries and the distribution of their severity levels from a national database based on police reports. This was straightforward, but the data was quite unstable from year to year for unknown reasons. Another drawback to this data was that it did not include injuries caused by hard braking or sudden acceleration events that were not associated with crashes. Those injuries were also a target of the design improvements. In addition, urban and rural rates were tabulated separately, because the rate of adoption of the design improvements was very different in these areas.

The amputations case study was the most difficult, and it did not yield economic benefit estimates. One reason was that data on injury rates and injury costs were not available for the inspected workplaces where amputations had occurred.

Step2b required an estimate of prevention effectiveness in reducing injuries or injury costs. This step was unique to the injury case studies, but it is analogous to the step in the illness case studies in which prevention effectiveness in reducing exposures was estimated. As for other steps, there were important differences among injury case studies in the strategies needed to complete this step.

In the safety grants case study, the NIOSH study of prevention measure effectiveness that was the subject of the case study had already provided such estimates.

In the ambulance redesign case study, constructing credible prevention effectiveness estimates was the biggest challenge. There was no data demonstrating the effectiveness of the redesigned ambulances in the field, and there were many engineering improvements made. Each of the improvements was tested in controlled conditions, but those tests did not yield any overall measure of effectiveness in preventing injuries. However, the tests used to evaluate the new designs used equipment and standards that were meant to be equal to or surpass those that had already been used to upgrade safety in other vehicles and occupant positions. Based on this, the new injury rates and severity levels were assumed equal to those for passengers and drivers who had already benefited from analogous improvements. Thus, the injury rates for these other passengers and drivers were extracted from the police report data. Two other groups were taken to represent the new improved safety levels achieved for ambulance patient compartment occupants: back-seat passengers of automobiles, and drivers of ambulances. In addition, the safety belt effectiveness literature based on observed results of seat belt use in other settings was used for a third estimate of projected percentage declines in injury rates, because passenger restraints were central to the ambulance improvements.

As mentioned, the amputations case study did not produce benefit estimates. Again, data were not available on pre- or post-inspection injury rates, and even if they were, RAND did not have a valid comparison group. Such a group could theoretically be constructed through randomizing the choice of amputation workplaces to inspect and comparing subsequent injury rates, but any such experiment would be problematic in the context of an enforcement program.

The amputations case study did demonstrate that the inspections targeted by information on amputations yielded a greater number of violations and greater total fines. However, RAND could not assume that inspection effectiveness was proportional to violations or fines. There is some literature on effectiveness of OSHA inspections on reducing injuries, but these studies have not provided quantitative estimates of the effectiveness of finding more violations per inspection. 36 – 38

In Step 2c, the last step in Table 3 , calculation of the reduction in injuries and injury costs, was straightforward, requiring only the estimates made in the previous two steps.

4.3 |. Assigning values to prevented injuries and illnesses (Step 3)

In the previous section, we saw that there was a general difference in the methods used in the illness and injury case studies, but variation within these two groups of cases in the strategies used to follow these methods. When it comes to assigning values to prevented injuries and illnesses, there is more commonality between illness and injury cases, but we will note some differences in data availability and requirements.

As mentioned above, where possible, we used two methods for assigning dollar values to prevented injuries and illnesses in each case study: WTP and the sum of medical costs and productivity losses. For fatal injuries and illnesses, the WTP method uses relatively consistent, value of a statistical life (VSL) estimates that are usually applied to all deaths equally, regardless of age or other circumstance. This makes these estimates simple to use. RAND used a VSL value from Viscusi and Aldy (2003) 39 expressed in 2016 dollars (9.5 million) or 2018 dollars (10.0 million) for most case studies, but a value of 10.7 million in 2018 dollars taken from the National Safety Council 40 for the ambulance safety case study.

4.3.1 |. WTP for avoiding nonfatal illnesses and injuries

Unlike values for VSL, WTP values for averting nonfatal cases of illness and injury are different for each illness or for each injury severity level, and there is no single set of widely accepted values. In the asphalt milling case study, RAND followed OSHA in using a low-end estimate of $68,000, a high-end estimate of $5.5 million, and a midpoint estimate of $2.8 million for the value of averting a nonfatal illness. In the firefighter cancer case study, RAND did not report separate values for nonfatal and fatal cases, but noted that their high and low estimates of total WTP benefits (nonfatal and fatal combined) varied by a factor of 2.3 depending on the assumption about WTP values for morbidity. In the PDM case study, a variety of sources were used for WTP estimates to avert nonfatal illness. The least severe form of coal workers’ pneumoconiosis (CWP 1+) was assigned a value of $71,000 for lost workday injuries; the next most severe form (CWP 2+) was assigned a value of $490,000 for chronic bronchitis from an Environmental Protection Agency publication, 41 and values for progressive massive fibrosis (PMF) and COPD were assigned values using estimates assembled for the most recent coal dust rule, which were derived from two cited publications. 42 , 43 These values averaged 36% of the value of averting death, so that figure was used to arrive at an estimate of $3.6 million for PMF and COPD. In the ambulance redesign case study, estimates of WTP values for nonfatal injuries of different severity levels were taken from a publication of the National Safety Council (2017). 44

In the safety grants case study, no attempt was made to estimate WTP to avert nonfatal injuries, due in part to the fact that injury rate reductions were not estimated in that case study. Instead, cost reductions (medical costs and productivity losses) resulting from the prevention measure were estimated directly.

4.3.2 |. Medical costs and productivity losses of averted illnesses

Success in estimating medical costs and productivity losses of illnesses was mixed. Medical costs of cancer cases are available in more detail than other conditions. Only for cancer are there readily available estimates for how annual healthcare costs change over time from year of diagnosis to death, which allows proper discounting of future cost savings. For other illnesses, typically only average annual costs across all illness stages are available. In the asphalt milling case study, medical costs for fatal cancer cases but not for fatal cases of PMF or nonmalignant respiratory disease (NMRD) were estimated. In the firefighter cancer case study, different forms of cancer were the only illnesses, so medical cost data was available. In the PDM case study, average annual medical costs for CWP and COPD were each available from specialized published studies or tabulations, and these were combined with estimates of years of treatment based on assumptions about average age at diagnosis and lifespan. Medical costs associated with the broad category of deaths due to NMRD were calculated from results of a well-known study by Leigh (2011) of total US costs of occupational injury and illness. 30

Productivity losses due to illness can be divided into those that occur due to early death, and those that occur before death due to loss of employment, absenteeism, and loss of ability to do household work. Those that are due to early death are most easily estimated, based on published tables giving average earnings and household work values for men and women by age. 45 While these are not specific to people working in different occupations, they can be adjusted for the average income of the relevant occupational group, as they were in the asphalt milling and PDM case studies. Productivity costs incurred before death are more difficult to estimate. In the PDM case study, RAND followed Leigh (2011) 30 by multiplying productivity costs due to early death due to NMRD by a ratio of pre- to post-death productivity costs for fatal cases estimated in an early, foundational study of costs of occupational injury and illness by Rice et al. (1985) 29 Productivity losses associated with nonfatal cases of CWP, PMF, and COPD were based directly on estimates in Leigh (2011). 30 Similar methods were used for productivity costs associated with fatal lung cancer in the asphalt milling and firefighter cancer case studies.

4.3.3 |. Medical costs and productivity losses of averted injuries

When injuries result in fatalities, their productivity costs can be estimated based on age at death, just as they are for deaths due to illness. Their medical costs can be estimated using workers’ compensation records. However, the share of fatal injuries in total injuries is small, so estimating the cost of nonfatal injuries is particularly important. The safety grants case study only involved nonfatal injuries. The medical costs and productivity losses associated with these injuries were estimated using data on costs of workers’ compensation claims, whose benefits are intended to pay for all medical care for work injuries and replace a certain percentage of lost earnings (indemnity benefits). However, available claim cost information does not typically include administrative costs for delivering these benefits, which are substantial. Only a few estimates of these costs are available, contributing to uncertainty in the RAND estimates. More important is the fact that indemnity benefits may not be a good indicator of loss of earnings if these losses go beyond the loss of wages recorded for the claim. RAND provided one estimate of total lost earnings based on the formulas for determining percent of wages replaced by benefits and another much higher estimate based on an estimate of income losses over 10 years following work injury claims that was published for New Mexico. 46 In the ambulance redesign case study, medical costs and productivity losses associated with crashes were derived from National Safety Council (2017) 44 estimates of total crash costs, inclusive of property damage, medical costs, productivity losses, and administrative costs. Estimates were published both with and without injuries, with the difference being attributed by RAND to injury costs. Note that property damages are not usually included in cost of injury estimates. Though they might be relevant to other injury prevention measures, they do not apply in this situation, because the prevention measures were designed to reduce the injury consequences of crashes, but not crash events.

4.4 |. Estimating illness and injury reductions in the absence of NIOSH (Step 4)

The previous steps constructed an estimate of the value of observed or projected illness and injury reductions. But the degree to which NIOSH is responsible for these reductions needs to be assessed. In each of the six case studies, this assessment was done based on whether there were any other known research efforts that could have produced similar technology or information, and whether it was reasonable to assume that the prevention activities that led to the reductions would have happened in the absence of NIOSH. From a short-run perspective, the answers were generally clear. In the asphalt milling, PDM, and ambulance redesign case studies, no one else other than NIOSH and its partners was doing similar research, and the illness reductions depended upon the new technologies created.

In the firefighter cancer case study, when NIOSH began its work, there was already concern in the firefighting community that firefighting exposures may be leading to higher cancer rates. In addition, there were a number of small US studies that supported this idea, as well as three notable large-scale studies in other countries emerging in the same general time period. But there was no consensus about whether firefighter exposures were causing higher cancer rates. Industry experts indicated that it was clearly the NIOSH cancer study, using rigorous methods and a large sample of US firefighters, that crystallized a new consensus about the dangers of firefighter exposures and led very quickly to a nationwide shift in attitudes that drove efforts to implement a common set of prevention measures.

In the safety grants case study, the expansion of the grant program occurred very quickly after the preliminary results became known and was directly driven by those results, according to the program’s administrator. The Michigan amputation surveillance system created with NIOSH support was clearly dependent on NIOSH funding and led directly to targeting some OSHA inspections with information that was not otherwise available.

Because NIOSH research was indispensable for realizing illness and injury reductions, all of these reductions could be counted as benefits of NIOSH research. But over the long run, it is less likely that at least some reductions would not have occurred by other means. To take account of this possibility, longer time-range counterfactual scenarios were constructed and used for two of the case studies—asphalt milling and safety grants case studies. A counterfactual scenario projects what might have happened, or might happen in the future, if NIOSH had not acted. This step can be critical to both illness and injury case studies.

Both the asphalt milling and safety grants case studies used a simple form of counterfactual—an assumption that the same outcomes would have been achieved without NIOSH, but with a delay. This type of counterfactual essentially modifies the baseline injury or illness trend to which the post-NIOSH trend is compared. For asphalt milling, the counterfactual was that engineering controls would have been developed in Europe and then introduced widely in the United States 15 years later. There were some known research efforts in Europe, although they had not translated into practice. This counterfactual results in somewhat less than half of the estimated benefits without the counterfactual. In the safety grants case study, the program’s administrator estimated that its success might have otherwise become known 5 years later and then expanded, just as it was following the NIOSH research.

Other case studies did not include a long time-range counter-factual, although they could have. For example, just before NIOSH began its study of cancer among firefighters, the National League of Cities stated in 2009 47 that there was a lack of evidence to confirm or deny the link between firefighting and cancer, but there was already widespread concern in the firefighting community about potential cancer risks. There were also several related important studies in other countries and there could have been additional studies in the absence of NIOSH. Therefore, it could be straightforward to apply a delayed firefighter protection counterfactual to the RAND study and derive lower, alternative benefit estimates, as was done in the asphalt milling case study. We note, however, that while possible future impacts of foreign studies in the United States were not taken into account, neither were the positive impacts of NIOSH studies on the rest of the world.

Although counterfactuals are speculative, they can have a large impact on estimated benefits. Thus, they need to be constructed based on known facts, and be perceived as reasonable. Knowledge of international developments is sometimes critical to project the future, and the asphalt milling and firefighter cancer cases are good examples.

Scenarios that reach decades into the future are subject to large uncertainties, including the difficulty of foreseeing technological change. Automation may greatly reduce the need for some current jobs. Changes in materials, sources of energy, or means of delivering products and services could substantially reduce or increase the hazards to which workers are exposed, without any change in level of attention to safety and health. For example, it is not hard to imagine that the need for asphalt pavement milling and coal mining could change in unexpected ways in the future, or that the means of emergency medical transport or the techniques of firefighting might be subject to large changes. While detailed speculation about the distant future might not be productive, it could be worth noting signs of the general direction of future trends.

4.5 |. The contributions of other stakeholders to the outcomes

In all six case studies, the NIOSH contribution was not the only one that was necessary to achieve the outcome. Some of the major contributions from other stakeholders are summarized in Table 4 . We note that counterfactual analyses of the contributions of these other stakeholders could reasonably conclude that they also were responsible for the outcome.

Contributions of nonemployer stakeholders

A full cost–benefit analysis would include all parties who incurred costs to bring about the result. In such a framework, total costs could be compared to total benefits, and there would be no need for the benefits to be allocated to various contributors. Obtaining information on all of the costs of other parties involved in research, dissemination, and implementation would present challenges that were not addressed in the RAND case studies, especially because these costs are incurred by numerous parties and may not all be recorded as separately identifiable expenditures of time and funds.

5 |. HOW CAN ECONOMIC ESTIMATION OF NIOSH RESEARCH BENEFITS BE MORE WIDELY APPLIED?

5.1 |. factors contributing to feasibility of rand case study benefit estimates.

To assess the extent to which we can more widely apply the approach RAND used to estimate economic benefits of NIOSH research, we need to understand how several factors were critical to the feasibility of the six case studies described. Some of these factors were present to some degree in all case studies, and some were important in only a subset.

The first factor is the presence of a clear link between NIOSH research and subsequent prevention implementation in the workplace. This link was key to the selection of the case studies, although RAND had to clarify and confirm it. For example, in some instances, NIOSH created new technology that was not available elsewhere, and in others, the expert informants stated that NIOSH research had initiated prevention activities, and the timing of events supported this.

The second factor was the presence of government regulation, which typically requires universal implementation of certain prevention measures in a well-defined population. This enabled specification of the timing and extent of prevention implementation. The establishment of regulations based on exposure limits also requires a formal risk assessment, which provides needed information on the relationship between reduction in exposure and reduction in number of illnesses. In the ambulance redesign case study, regulation took the form of establishment of purchasing specification standards by the states, so the risk assessments that are part of the traditional federal regulatory process were not available.

The third factor was the presence of a strong network of industry and labor organizations. The firefighter cancer case study did not involve regulation, but a fairly standard set of recommendations was disseminated very widely in the firefighting community, with most departments voluntarily deciding to implement them. This appears to be the result of a very strong network of active organizations that shares and improves techniques and knowledge of a wide variety of firefighting subjects, as well as a national firefighter community that has been organized to address health issues.

A fourth factor was the focus on prevention measures embodied in technologies that, once installed, either automatically or typically lead to risk reduction. The simplest case study was asphalt milling, where the technology was built into the milling machines. The ambulance redesign case study also centered on a technology improvement, but was more complicated, with multiple engineering control improvements and a reliance on workers to adopt a new habit of using restraints. The firefighter cancer case study was centered more on changed practices than new technology, but the effectiveness of the techniques and equipment that were recommended could still be tested and measured, and this informed expert judgments upon which the analysis relied. In the PDM case study, the effectiveness of prevention depended upon miners responding to the dust levels the PDM displayed. Still, this single technology was a clear marker of implementation. Using small numbers of miners, additional NIOSH research verified that miner actions to reduce exposure did indeed flow from use of the technology. 48

A fifth factor in some of the case studies was implementation of the prevention measure in a well-defined group. This factor was sometimes present due to regulatory requirements as mentioned above, either directly or indirectly. Without a well-defined population, it is harder to quantify the number of workers targeted and the extent to which the prevention measure was implemented. For example, it was harder to define the number of those working with large asphalt milling machines than the number of miners using PDMs. In the firefighter case study, the extent of prevention implementation in the relevant population was uncertain, but professional firefighters were a well-defined group of known size. In the safety grant case study, the group benefiting from prevention was not defined by occupation or task, but it was clearly identified, because the prevention measures were funded and documented on the individual employer level by a government program. The previously mentioned small case studies from the Institute for Work and Health of Ontario also provide an illustration of how frequently government program administration can be a key to defining target worker groups. Only five of their 42 published case studies were designated as documenting benefits (“societal outcomes”) such as cost reductions, shortened time away from work, or injury and illness reductions, and all of these focused on outcomes for populations served by a public workers’ compensation insurance agency. 4

A sixth factor in most of the case studies was that the prevention measures assessed were not implemented together with other prevention measures targeting the same risks. This made it easier to measure their impact. For example, the PDMs were just one part of a new rule that enforced lower exposure standards and made inspection protocols more rigorous. Only because use of PDMs was required 6 months earlier than the other parts of the rule was the data able to show the separate effect of the PDMs.

Seventh and finally, case studies were facilitated by the availability of data on exposures in the post-prevention period, as in the PDM case study, or of data on post-prevention injury rates, as in the safety grant case study, which used state workers’ compensation claims data. In the ambulance redesign case study, data was not available for the post-prevention period. However, data was available from police reports on the rates of crash injuries for vehicles and vehicle occupant positions that had previously met the engineering test standards used by the ambulance redesign effort.

5.2 |. Increasing the feasibility of economic measurement of benefits

The case studies conducted by RAND were selected largely because of their feasibility, but the challenges encountered suggest some potential avenues for increasing the feasibility of economic benefit assessment for a wider range of research efforts.

One way to increase capacity to measure the economic benefits of research would be to establish more formal support or processes for gathering information on the long-term impacts of research. This might not only support additional quantitative estimates of impacts, but also offer insights into how these impacts could be increased in the future. Currently, it remains hard to track the transfer of occupational safety and health research to practice by others, including regulatory agencies and the private sector. The transfer often takes place many years after the research is completed and researchers have shifted their attention to other projects. While researchers may learn, through their networks, about uses of their research by others, more focused efforts may be needed to gather information through literature searches, communications with key government and private employer contacts, or surveys of workers and employers.

Another way to increase capacity to measure benefits with economic metrics would be to improve baseline estimates of excess risk or exposure. This information provides a foundation for measuring the benefits that added prevention may bring. Establishing such baseline estimates in some of the RAND case studies was challenging, so other potential case studies may pose similar challenges. For example, baseline measurements of exposures to silica in asphalt milling dust were available, but they were few, and only from some regions of the country. In the ambulance redesign case study, there were no statistics readily available on the excess number of injuries occurring in the rear patient compartment, or their severity distribution, so estimating this baseline risk of injury became a central challenge of that case study. While estimating baseline excess risk and exposure is one of the basic functions of occupational safety and health surveillance, given limited resources, surveillance often focuses on numbers and rates of injury and illness outcomes rather than the hazards and exposures that may cause them. Illness and injury outcome information is often reasonably viewed as the highest priority and is generally easier and less expensive to collect. In contrast, exposure assessment efforts typically require labor intensive involvement of highly trained personnel or specialized surveys. Developing methods of prevention and providing implementation guidance is a higher priority than gathering representative baseline risk and exposure information. And, unlike in some of the RAND case studies, there are typically already several prevention methods in place to varying degrees among many employers, so determining the overall baseline requires more information about both risks and mitigation measures in a wider range of workplaces.

One of the ways that NIOSH research may have an impact is by producing information that can lead to better targeted OSHA inspections. We saw this in the amputation surveillance case study. This was also true in a NIOSH research effort that was considered, but not selected as a subject of a RAND case study. NIOSH researched the rates and causes of carpal tunnel syndrome among poultry processing workers. The main identified impact of that activity was establishment of regional special emphasis programs at OSHA for poultry processors. In both of these examples, measuring the impact of NIOSH research requires knowledge of the impact of OSHA inspections and assistance to employers. Some studies of the impact of OSHA inspections compare employers who received inspections to those who did not 36 , 38 but since improving the targeting of inspections generally has no effect on the total number of inspections completed, these studies cannot be directly used. There are other studies providing strong evidence that inspections with penalties reduce injuries more than those without, 37 but we really need quantitative estimates of the impact of shifting inspection resources from employers with lower hazard levels (fewer violations) to those with higher hazard levels (more violations). Research to generate such estimates could thus provide a necessary support for benefit estimates of some NIOSH research.

Identifying and further developing a set of standard values of averting nonfatal injuries and illnesses would also facilitate the measurement of economic benefits. Valuation of fatality reductions is relatively straightforward, because it employs a single standard value applicable to all types of fatalities called the VSL. While the standard value used varies somewhat across federal agencies, there is a single value mandated for use by the Department of Health and Human Services. 49 It would help, however, to have standard information on distribution of age at death for various conditions to compute lost productivity associated with death, as well as standard estimates of medical costs by cause of death. The larger challenge is with respect to nonfatal cases, where WTP estimates vary quite widely, as noted by RAND. Medical costs are well-known for major types of cancer since the National Cancer Institute compiles information on costs of medical care over time from year of diagnosis to year of death. 50 This time path of costs enables proper calculation of the present value of medical costs based on discounting. However, this information is not usually available for other illnesses. Information on average annual medical costs per illness case have been obtained from sources such as the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), or might be obtained somewhat less comprehensively from commercial medical claims databases. However, this information is usually developed based on research efforts focused on one or a small number of conditions and is not available for many conditions. The same may be said of information on the productivity costs of medical conditions for which MEPS is again the leading source of data. We note that the need for this information is not specific to the occupational safety and health community, so it would make sense to support a broader effort to further develop and keep updated a basic set of cost estimates.

Another way to support expanded use of benefit measurement is to use the RAND case study experience to guide smaller scale, internal benefit assessments by NIOSH personnel. RAND assisted NIOSH by using complex quantitative analysis skills, and an independent perspective on evaluation standards and methods. In addition, the completion of the six case studies has also made it much clearer what the general steps in conducting such an analysis need to be. However, in the process of developing a menu of potential case studies and identifying the basic methods and data available to carry them out, NIOSH also found that the general scale of benefits could be estimated in rough but useful form with a relatively small investment of time and budget. To be sure, any smaller scale, less fully developed analysis may reach conclusions that are less exact and certain. But if they were constructed with full transparency, they might be used as a reasonable basis of assessment of research results, and would still represent a valuable addition to current measures of impact. Part of the economy achieved by this approach would be due to the fact that, even with RAND’s expertise and extensive efforts, a lot of the assembly of data and preliminary search for potential estimation strategies had to be carried out by NIOSH personnel.

While the RAND case studies did not attempt to estimate the total cost of the prevention measures that lead to the measured benefits, it would be desirable to pursue this in the future, to assemble complete, cost and benefit assessments. One means of obtaining cost information would be to build into NIOSH research projects, where appropriate, an objective of collecting information from research subjects and partners on their expenditures of time, resources, and funds to implement recommended prevention measures. This information might be collected in the course of collecting other information, and in the context of working relationships established for the research process. Assistance from personnel with specialized experience in cost analysis may be needed. While the information collected would not necessarily be representative of all workplaces for relevant occupations and industries, it would be likely to yield information on the general scale of costs per workplace and protected worker, so that a range of values for national costs could be constructed.

5.3 |. Barriers to feasibility of economic benefit studies of NIOSH activities

NIOSH engages in a wide variety of activities, many of which present much greater challenges to estimating economic benefits than did the RAND case studies. Examples include many epidemiological studies, occupational health surveillance, training for workers and managers, prevention recommendations, and laboratory and field methods for measuring exposure.

Most epidemiological studies do not immediately lead to an industrywide campaign to implement a new set of prevention recommendations as they did in the firefighter cancer case study. More typically, epidemiological findings tend to accumulate over time and gradually lead to actions in workplaces, many of which are voluntary and unrecorded in publicly available data.

Much the same can be said about surveillance information, which may point in a general way to industries and occupations or other broad groups of workers with elevated rates of certain injuries or illnesses. Such data do not often represent a wholly new understanding of risks and needed prevention measures, or the only impetus for progress in prevention.

Training for workers and managers on how to identify certain risks and mitigate them is also difficult to evaluate. Typically, post-training surveys are used to obtain participant reactions to the training and retention of its main messages. But it is difficult to measure training’s impact on subsequent prevention practices and results, especially over the long term. The outcomes of training can be enormously varied, and it is difficult to isolate the impact of a specific training on subsequent actions when there are other sources of information and safety initiatives that are also important.

A major responsibility of NIOSH is to provide prevention recommendations that are made freely available for voluntary use. But it is often difficult or impossible to know who is accessing and acting on those recommendations. The number of downloads and requests can often be recorded, but there is usually no practical system for determining their use or even gathering reports about their usefulness.

Developing and disseminating standard methods of exposure measurement is one of the infrastructural science responsibilities of NIOSH, but tracing out their influence on subsequent investigations and research, on subsequent prevention recommendations and on workplace prevention appears daunting. It may be better to regard such activities as overhead costs of other activities that are closer to practical application. In other words, rather than attempting to isolate their benefits, perhaps it should be acknowledged that their benefits will be part of the benefits attributed to other applied research efforts that use the measurement standards, and that the cost of developing the measurement standards should therefore be added to the total cost of those other efforts.

So what may be done in situations where economic measurement of benefits appears daunting? One response is to say that “partial assessment” of benefits can be useful, even if it cannot deliver bottom-line benefit estimates. This might particularly apply to prevention recommendations. As the RAND case studies demonstrate, the greatest benefits are achieved when the population addressed is large, when the baseline risk is high, and when the relevant prevention measures are effective. If these parameters are available, and if the lower level of risk with the recommended prevention measures in place can be estimated, then the potential number of illnesses or injuries averted can be estimated. Such estimates, along with attention to available information on the proportion of relevant employers that may have been reached through dissemination efforts, could help to measure relative potential for impact among NIOSH efforts devoted to providing guidance. Measurement of risk levels subsequent to dissemination of NIOSH research results could also help retrospectively to define the upper limit of the value of safety and health improvements for which NIOSH may have been responsible.

When safety and health improvements are observed following dissemination of NIOSH information, it is usually difficult to determine the degree to which the information was responsible. NIOSH has conducted surveys to determine the overall frequency with which professional, trade, and labor organizations rely upon and further disseminate information from NIOSH. 51 , 52 In contrast, instead of focusing on rates of dissemination and use of information, a case study approach could focus on a specific set of workplace safety and health improvements for an industry and work backward to gain insight into how those improvements were made by interviewing a sample of the employers responsible for them. Researchers could attempt to determine the motivating factors behind the specific safety and health improvements and then to determine the sources of information that may have been critical for supporting the improvements. These critical information sources could then be examined to assess the extent to which they may have been directly or indirectly based on NIOSH research. This could require some tracing of information as it gets picked up and repackaged by disseminating parties in government, industry, and worker organization networks.

6 |. IMPLICATIONS FOR STRATEGIC AND PROJECT PLANNING

The RAND case study results are a validation of the basic approach NIOSH uses to guide and select research proposals for funding within and outside NIOSH: the Burden, Need, and Impact (BNI) framework. 53 In this framework, project proposals are assessed on (1) magnitude of burden, as indicated by the size of the worker population they address, and the rate and severity of outcomes associated with the hazards they address, (2) the need for the particular research approach and resulting information as indicated by the demand of stakeholders for the information to be produced and their willingness to support the research, as well as by identified gaps in the safety and health literature, and (3) the potential for impact in terms of the effectiveness of relevant prevention measures and the prospect for wide dissemination and adoption of those measures. The factors that lead to success and relatively large benefits in the RAND case studies are well represented in these BNI categories.

If the RAND case studies represent some of NIOSH’s most successful research efforts, then they also point to the effectiveness of not only having stakeholder support but having stakeholders in the industry who are both research collaborators and direct users of the resulting information. And they highlight the value of stakeholders who can enforce or have an unusual capacity for promoting industrywide use of the results. This provides some insight into the factors that contribute to successful research translation, which is the focus of a recently established program at NIOSH. They also illustrate that the research knowledge being translated into prevention does not always consist of new prevention measures or guidance. It may also be new knowledge of risk levels as in the firefighter cancer case study, or about the effectiveness of already existing prevention measures as in the safety grants case study, or about the location of known risk types as in the amputation surveillance case study.

Another perspective on strategic and project planning can be gained by noting that some of the basic parameters of BNI were not necessarily available when the research that was the subject of the RAND case studies was begun. For example, in the asphalt milling case studies, there was little knowledge of the size of the population addressed by the research. RAND had to estimate it and find relevant information within the cost–benefit analyses done for OSHA. In the firefighter cancer case study, it was unknown whether any excess risk of cancer would be found, and it if had not been, it could not have led to the major results observed. In the ambulance redesign case study, there was no quantitative knowledge of the existing burden of injuries, though there were reasons to believe it was significant. In the safety grants and amputation surveillance case studies, the effectiveness of the resulting prevention measures was unknown until quantified by the NIOSH research that was the subject of the case studies. This points up the fact that research often needs to be undertaken without basic knowledge that allows prediction of its effects. However, a quantitative range of potential benefits might still have been possible to develop and might have strengthened the original research proposals.

7 |. CONCLUSION

We noted that there have been few attempts to date to measure the societal benefits of research with economic metrics, and none that require the same combination of methods as the NIOSH-sponsored RAND case studies. The NIOSH case studies required linking of specific research efforts to specific actions by others (employers), quantitatively measuring the extent of those actions and their impact on specific health outcomes, assessing the extent to which those actions might have occurred without research, and assigning dollar values to specific health outcomes. The experience gained through this combination of challenges may help point the way forward to realizing the widely shared goal of measuring research benefits, particularly health-related research supported by the public sector. The feasibility of quantitatively measuring benefits of NIOSH research with economic metrics has been demonstrated in several instances in which the impact of NIOSH research was already recognized in a qualitative sense and data availability was particularly favorable. Some additional NIOSH research efforts of this type can be identified, and there are ways that application of the same methods might be extended to other NIOSH research efforts that appear more difficult to assess. Such applications could be useful for making benefits more concrete to NIOSH’s funders and stakeholders, and to workers, employers, and its own staff, and for helping to assess the value of continuing investment in NIOSH research. The experience of these six case studies provides a set of general methods to follow but demonstrates that additional applications are likely also to require creativity in seeking out new data sources and expert informants, as well as means of analysis that overcome data limitations. In addition, we should recognize that a number of NIOSH responsibilities, such as providing prevention guidance, training occupational safety and health specialists, conducting surveillance of injury and illness patterns, producing epidemiological evidence for occupational risks, and establishing exposure measurement standards will often lead to benefits that are quite difficult to measure. For these critical activities, only partial steps toward quantification of benefits might still yield ranges of potential impact magnitudes and assist in judging results and setting priorities. Further, attempting quantification of benefits can help to document how impacts were achieved, even when it does not reach a bottom-line benefit estimate. The difficulties of applying these methods to situations in which there is no available mechanism to track, compel, or strongly incentivize prevention implementation also suggests that some effort might be directed to focused investigation of the sources of information that have played major roles in instances of notable improvements in safety and health and the part that NIOSH research may have played, either directly or indirectly.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors report that there was no funding source for the work that resulted in the article or the preparation of the article.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

DISCLOSURE BY AJIM EDITOR OF RECORD

John Meyer declares that he has no conflict of interest in the review and publication decision regarding this article.

ETHICS APPROVAL AND INFORMED CONSENT

No ethics review nor informed consent was required as no human subjects research was involved.

The findings and conclusions in this report of the authors do not necessarily represent the views of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the US Department of Health and Human Services.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

• Top Stories

Artificial Intelligence

Confined spaces, construction safety, electrical safety, fall protection, fire safety, protective apparel.

• Training and Software
• More Topics
• Current Issue
• Advisory Board
• Digital Edition
• Letters to the Editor
• Writer's Guidelines

White Papers

• Latest Products
• IH Product Showcase
• Subscribe to e-Newsletters
• Career Network
• Industry Directory

Industrial Hygiene

• New Product of the Year
• Environmental Protection New Product of the Year
• Agency@1105
• List Rentals

Advanced Search

• Construction
• Heat Stress

Behavioral Safety

Chemical safety, combustible dust, coronavirus, disaster preparedness, drug and alcohol testing, emergency response, enforcement, environmental protection, facility security, food safety, foot protection, hand protection, hazard communication, head & face protection, health & medical management, health care, hearing protection, heat stress & thirst quenchers, human resources, indoor air quality, infectious diseases, international safety, machine guarding/lockout, oil and gas, plant maintenance, protective fabrics, regulations and standards, respiratory, risk management, showers and eyewash, training & software, transportation safety, vision protection.

• Most Popular Articles
• Most Emailed Articles

Keeping an Ear Out for New Safety Insights

Assessing respiratory hazards and risks during disasters, revolutionizing safety: how ai is transforming the workplace, weekly checkup: 5 essential tests for emergency safety showers and eyewash stations, safety 2024 sets a record and drives home value.

Experts discuss AI's transformative role in enhancing productivity, safety and innovation.

Integrating AI and IoT into workplace safety enhances predictive analytics, real-time monitoring and proactive risk management to significantly reduce accidents and improve overall safety.

When done correctly, a combination of new technology and traditional methods can create the perfect balance of engaging, thoughtful training that employees need.

More AI Coverage

• Health & Safety Institute (HSI) Building A Winning Safety Culture for Organizations with a Complex Supply Chain Aug 29, 2024
• Honeywell Industrial Safety, Industrial Scientific Corp., SafetyIQ, Vector Solutions Utilities Update: The State of Electrical Safety Sep 05, 2024
• SafetyIQ Executive Q&A - Safety is Not Subtle: A No-Nonsense Look at EHS Sep 10, 2024
• J. J. Keller & Associates Inc. Preventing Bullying and Violence in the Workplace: 5 Strategies to Reduce Risk Sep 11, 2024
• Protective Industrial Products 7 Steps To A Cold Stress Prevention Program Sep 12, 2024
• Superior Glove How to Build a Hand Safety Program: Reduce hand injuries and improve worker safety Sep 18, 2024

All Webinars

• ANSI Z359 Quick Reference Guide
• OSHA’s HazCom Standard: Readiness Checklist for The Final Rule Aligning with GHS Rev 7
• Fall Protection Toolkit
• Busting Myths and Building Communities
• Measure What Matters

All White Papers

• Bibliography
• More Referencing guides Blog Automated transliteration Relevant bibliographies by topics
• Automated transliteration
• Relevant bibliographies by topics
• Referencing guides

Search WSPS.CA

Occupational h&s practices research.

Find evidence-based tools and current research initiatives focused on the study of OHS Practices

The Occupational Health and Safety Act sets out the rights and duties of all parties in the workplace, as well as the procedures for dealing with workplace hazards and for enforcement as needed. All workplace parties have a responsibility for promoting health and safety in the workplace and a role to play to help the workplace be in compliance with the statutory requirements set out under the Act1.

This section offers evidences based research tools and resources to help employers enhance their occupational health and safety practices to prevent injuries in the workplace and meet the OHSA guidelines.

1 Guide to the Occupational Health and Safety Act

Evidence-Based Tools & Resources:

Systematic literature review on the effects of occupational safety & health.

The aim of this review was to assess whether OHS legislative and regulatory policy could improve the working environment in terms of reduced levels of industrial injuries and fatalities, musculoskeletal disorders, worker complaints, sick leave, and adverse occupational exposures. . Jun 10, 2019

A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship Between Ageing & Occupational Safety & Health

Does ageing have a preventive or an aggravating effect on occupational health and safety (OHS)? How do the potential moderators of measurement of accidents, gender, occupation and cut-off age influence the relationship between ageing and OHS? Read this study for a meta-analysis of evidence. Jan 22, 2019

Gender Differences in Injuries Attributed to Workplace Violence in Ontario 2002-2015

Researchers at the Institute for Work and Health conducted a research study to analyze the trends of workplace violence for men and women in Ontario. This progressive study outlines findings from both claims data and hospital records. Sep 26, 2018

Assessment of Safety Climate within Food Manufacturing Facilities

WSPS is partnering with a research team from Ryerson University interested in understanding the safety climate at food processing facilities. The goal of the study is to better understand why the food processing sector faces challenges with respect to compliance with the Ontario Occupational Health and Safety Act. Sep 26, 2018

Addressing Essential Skills Gaps in an OHS Training Program

WSPS recently supported a research team at the Institute for Work and Health, who have found that modifying an OHS training program have a positive impact on the learning capability of workers. They have outlined the 12 step process in this guide for any organization to easily embed essential skills into their OHS Training. May 16, 2018

Occupational Health & Safety Legislative Gap Analysis of the Food Processing Sector in Ontario, Canada

With support from WSPS, researchers at Ryerson University conducted a study to uncover the occupational health and safety issues in food processing facilities. After a survey of 127 managers and coordinators, the analysis indicated that there were key concerns in relation to occupational and safety. Overall, the top three OHS concerns indicated by all respondents were: 1) manual material handling; 2) slips, trips and falls; and 3) energized equipment. Mar 28, 2018

Health & Safety Smart Planner: Economic Evaluation Software

Researchers at the Institute for Work and Health have developed a computer software that allows organizations to conduct economic evaluations. The Health & Safety Smart Planner is a software tool designed to calculate the costs and benefits of workplace health and safety initiatives, as well as the costs of health and safety incidents. Mar 28, 2018

Organization Performance Metric (OPM)

Over the last 5 years, WSPS partnered with the Institute for Work and Health, and the Ontario prevention system to develop an 8-item assessment tool that can be used to evaluate occupational health and safety performance. The tool has since been validate to acutely predict performance in companies that participated in the project. It has also been adopted by New Brunswick as the provincial OHS performance metric. Learn more by reading the WSPS Network News article Assess your OHS performance in just 5 minutes or visit the IWH Organizational Performance Metric (IWH-OPM) project page. Mar 01, 2018

Toking 9 to 5? Clearing the Haze on Cannabis Consumption in the Canadian Workplace

With the pending federal legislation to legalize recreational cannabis across Canada it is imperative for employers to understand the impact this will have on the health and safety of employees. WSPS is collaborating with the Institute for Work and Health (IWH) on a research project that will offer better understanding of current workplace consumption patterns, perceptions of the impact of cannabis on OHS, workplace social norms around cannabis, and perceptions around employee rights to use cannabis. Mar 01, 2018

Assessing the Effectiveness of Joint Health & Safety Committees - Evidence Based Tool

The Centre for Research Excellence in Occupational Disease (CREOD) has been gathering evidence to get a better understanding of the role, structure, resources and functioning of Joint Health and Safety Committees (JHSCs). Available is the self-assessment tool for JHSCs to generate feedback on committee processes and be a mechanism for enhancing communication and consensus with regards to its performance. Mar 01, 2018

OHS Vulnerability Measure

With support from WSPS, the Institute for Work and Health (IWH) has developed the OHS Vulnerability Measure. This tool measures the extent to which workers may be vulnerable to occupational health and safety risks at work. Read more on the Institute for Work & Health website. Mar 01, 2018

Ontario Leading Indicators Project (OLIP)

The Ontario Leading Indicator Project was conducted from 2011-2014 between WSPS, the Ontario health and safety associations (HSA's) and Institute for Work and Health (IWH). This project aimed to identify organizational and management measures that can be used as indicators to predict future health and safety performance. Over 1,200 WSPS firms have participated in this project, helping to develop and benchmark leading indicators for the prevention of workplace injuries and illnesses. Learn more by visiting the WSPS & the Ontario Leading Indicators Project or the IWH Ontario Leading Indicators Project (OLIP). Feb 28, 2018

Ready to take your learning to the next level?

Visit wsps's new resource hub.

Please explore our library of specially curated resources for applying OHS best practices

Related categories

Related articles.

• Title & authors

Armin, Hossein, et al. "Assessment and Ranking of Occupational Health and Safety Risks in the Machinery Maintenance Unit of Dam Construction Projects Using the Combined Approach of Methods (Fmea and Fuzzy Topsis)." International journal of health sciences , vol. 6, no. S7, 2022, pp. 5710-5723, doi: 10.53730/ijhs.v6nS7.13386 .

Download citation file:

A dam construction project is exposed to various risks due to the amount of investment, duration of implementation, the complexity of design and implementation, etc., and these risks will lead to human and financial losses. Thus, based on three principles, including (i) time, (ii) quality, and (iii) cost, identifying, assessing, ranking risks, and Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) can have a significant impact on project objectives. The machinery maintenance unit has the largest share of the organization's cost model. Manpower, tools, spare parts, and working standards of planning and scheduling are the most important elements of the implementation of the maintenance process in these organizations. Methodology In the present research, first, all the failure modes of the machinery maintenance unit were identified. Then, to assess and rank them, in addition to the three traditional attributes in Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) (severity-S, occurrence-O, and detection-D) and calculate the Risk Priority Number (RPN), we used fuzzy numbers corresponding to real-world problems instead of crisp numbers for risk ranking.&nbsp;

Table of contents

Implementation of Occupational Health and Safety in Industry

• Post published: 27 August, 2024
• Post category: StudyBullet-19
• Reading time: 3 mins read

What you will learn

Understand the importance of occupational health and safety (OHS).

Identify common workplace hazards and risks., develop and implement ohs policies and procedures., conduct effective risk assessments., investigate accidents and incidents., implement emergency response plans., promote a safety culture within the organization..

Why take this course?

This course provides a comprehensive overview of Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) principles and their critical role in safeguarding workplaces. Participants will gain a solid understanding of the fundamental concepts, legal framework, and the profound impact of OHS on both individuals and organizations.

The course commences with a clear definition of OHS, delineating its scope and objectives. It delves into the intricate legal and regulatory landscape governing occupational health and safety, emphasizing the importance of compliance. Participants will explore the multifaceted benefits of a robust OHS culture, including enhanced employee morale, reduced accidents, and improved organizational reputation.

A key focus of the course is on the human element of OHS. It underscores the significance of safeguarding workers’ physical and mental well-being, highlighting the potential consequences of workplace hazards and the devastating impact of occupational injuries and illnesses. Participants will learn how OHS contributes to creating a positive and supportive work environment, fostering employee engagement and productivity.

Furthermore, the course emphasizes the economic implications of OHS. It explores how effective OHS management can lead to cost savings through reduced accidents, workers’ compensation claims, and absenteeism. Additionally, it highlights the role of OHS in enhancing organizational performance and competitiveness.

By the end of this course, participants will have a strong foundation in OHS principles and their practical application. They will be equipped to identify potential hazards, assess risks, and contribute to the development and implementation of effective OHS programs. This knowledge will empower them to create safer and healthier workplaces for themselves and their colleagues.

💠 Follow this Video to Get Free Courses on Every Needed Topics! 💠

Emerging Technologies in Occupational Health and Safety

Loading... Editorial 07 February 2023 Editorial: Emerging technologies in occupational health and safety Hamzeh Mohammadi , Hadiseh Rabiei  and  Somayeh Farhang Dehghan 2,481 views 0 citations

Original Research 08 August 2022 Hearing loss and its associated factors among metal workshop workers at Gondar city, Northwest Ethiopia Mihret Melese ,  2 more  and  Ayechew Adera 2,811 views 7 citations

Original Research 02 August 2022 Emphasis on heat strain to the ocular surface: A functional and clinical study of a modified goggle Yuting Shao ,  5 more  and  Yanlong Bi 1,547 views 1 citations

Loading... Original Research 01 August 2022 UV protection properties of workwear fabrics coated with TiO2 nanoparticles Hadiseh Rabiei ,  3 more  and  Aysa Ghasemi Koozekonan 4,813 views 21 citations

Loading... Original Research 12 July 2022 The Relationship Between Nurses' Quality of Work-Life on Organizational Loyalty and Job Performance in Saudi Arabian Hospitals: A Cross-Sectional Study Reem N Al-Dossary 5,595 views 12 citations

Original Research 30 June 2022 Patient Acceptance and Intention to Use e-Consultations During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia Arwa Althumairi ,  2 more  and  Afnan Aljaffary 2,013 views 6 citations

Loading... Original Research 14 June 2022 Implementation of Chemical Health, Safety, and Environmental Risk Assessment in Laboratories: A Case-Series Study Farin Fatemi ,  1 more  and  Mohammadreza Jannati 5,761 views 9 citations

Original Research 18 April 2022 Evaluation of Closed System Transfer Devices in Preventing Chemotherapy Agents Contamination During Compounding Process—A Single and Comparative Study in China YiWen Tang ,  4 more  and  Yi Wang 4,006 views 3 citations

Original Research 21 February 2022 Assessment of Combination of Automated Pupillometry and Heart Rate Variability to Detect Driving Fatigue Lin Shi ,  4 more  and  Mao Zhang 2,550 views 7 citations

Loading... Original Research 09 February 2022 Assessing Workplace Stress Among Nurses Using Heart Rate Variability Analysis With Wearable ECG Device–A Pilot Study Xinxia Li ,  4 more  and  Lu Lv 4,098 views 10 citations

• Search News and Media
• All of Oklahoma State University

Headlines News and Media

Athletic training echo to prevent heat-related athlete collapses and enhance safety measures.

Thursday, August 29, 2024

Media Contact: Sydney Trainor | Communications and Media Relations Specialist | 405-744-9782 | [email protected]

As the school year starts, so do sports activities at all levels, from elementary school to college. With increased activity and severe temperatures, the risk of athletes collapsing rises.  

When Oklahoma State University Athletics team physician Dr. Jason Moore discusses heat exposure in triple-digit temperatures, he often encounters a common misconception. The first question he hears is whether hydration affects the risk.  

“You can be hydrated, or you can be dehydrated, you still have a risk depending upon what the relative humidity, the temperature, the direct sunlight exposure is,” Moore said. “I think you need to hydrate when exposed to high temperatures, there is evidence showing electrolyte abnormalities in hydration may have an impact on the body leading to heat cramps, but you're just as at risk of heat stroke regardless of hydration status.”   

Moore led the August Athletic Training-Sports Medicine Project ECHO — a collaboration between the Human Performance and Nutrition Research Institute and OSU Center for Health Sciences . He provided critical resources to help medical and school professionals prepare to respond appropriately when an athlete collapses from suspected arrhythmia, heat exposure or head injury.   

Project ECHO is a guided-practice model that reduces health disparities in underserved and remote areas of the state. Expert teams share their knowledge via virtual clinics to help local providers deliver best-in-practice care to rural communities.

“There are really three different types of heat illness that we're worried about, heat cramps, heat exhaustion and heat stroke,” Moore said.  

Heat cramps are likely caused by electrolyte imbalances. Athletes should hydrate more both at home and during practice, while also supplementing with electrolytes as needed.  

Heat exhaustion can cause nausea, vomiting, fatigue, headaches and an increased internal temperature. Affected athletes should be moved to a cool environment immediately, rest for 48-72 hours, and gradually return to heat for acclimatization.  

Heat strokes have similar symptoms but include neurological signs, putting athletes at high risk of seizures. Personnel should call 911 immediately and initiate cooling procedures according to the emergency action plan.  

Heat exposure can be mitigated through acclimatization, frequent breaks and practicing when the risk is lower.  

When it comes to head injuries during games or training, Moore said any loss of consciousness, confusion, headache, dizziness or any other neurologic symptoms should be treated like a concussion and evaluated urgently by a certified athletic trainer or physician.  

Sudden cardiac collapse is another concern we should all be prepared to deal with on the field of play.   

When NFL player Damar Hamlin collapsed during the Jan. 2, 2023, Monday Night Football game, he experienced a traumatic cardiac arrest.  

Hamlin had no known congenital conditions like hypertrophic cardiomyopathy or arrhythmias that would increase his risk.   

Although we cannot predict this type of cardiac arrest, a simple EKG can detect irregular rhythms, and abnormal electrical patterns of the heart allowing a preventative approach and a well-prepared emergency action plan can ensure personnel are ready for such events.  

“One issue with an EKG is, you're not going to catch every arrhythmia out there, but just discovering one may save a life and by getting them to a cardiologist or electrophysiologist before the season even starts allows you to make a more informed decision about fitness to play,” Moore said.   

An emergency action plan is crucial for these types of circumstances, and can save an athlete's life by ensuring equipment, like an automated external defibrillator is available at all games and practices, as well as having at least one CPR-certified person on the sidelines and having a plan for medical transportation.  

The Athletic Training-Sports Medicine ECHO line funded by the Tobacco Settlement Endowment Trust is held from noon to 1 p.m. on the second and fourth Wednesday of each month and presents expert knowledge of best practices in the identification, reduction, and treatment of sports-related injuries to keep student athletes active, healthy, and expedite return to play.  

Register for upcoming Athletic Training-Sports Medicine ECHO sessions.