video game review assignment

Home » Syllabus

2022 Course Schedule

(Syllabus Subject to Revision) All gameplay times offered are estimates based on averages taken from howlongtobeat.com .

The only games you will absolutely have to purchase are Mountain (Mac, PC), We Are Chicago (Mac, PC), There Is No Game (if you have a Mac and no PC access), and Stanley Parable: Ultra Deluxe (Platform of Choice).

Week 1: How to Close Read a Game

Sept 27: Introduction to Critical Videogame Studies: Play Passage or as a backup go to this browser-based version though unfortunately without the soundtrack (Jason Rohrer, 5 minutes), Hair Nah (Momo Pixel, 5 minutes), and Mountain (David O’Reilly, variable) in advance of the first class period.

Sept 29: “How to do a video game close reading?”: Read “Procedural Rhetoric” (Ian Bogost, Persuasive Games , p. 1-40), “Against Procedurality” (Miguel Sicart, online), and “Identity, Representation, and Video Game Studies beyond the Politics of the Image” (Jennifer Malkowski and TreaAndrea Russworm, Gaming Representation , p. 1-9). Play Dys4ia or watch here if you hit a glitch (Anna Anthropy, 7 minutes), Sim Nimby (Owen Weeks and Steve Nass, 2 minutes), and The Uber Game ( The Financial Times , 15-20 minutes).

Sept. 30 (Section): Introductions and Close Readings of Games

Week 2: Genre

Oct. 4: Read “Genre and the Video Game” (Mark J.P. Wolf, p. 113-134) and “Digital Games and Science Fiction” (Patrick Jagoda, p. 139-151)

Oct. 6: Play ONE of the following roguelike/roguelite adjacent games: Hades (Supergiant Games), Dead Cells (Motion Twin), Loop Hero (Four Quarters), Monster Train (Shiny Shoe), OR Cult of the Lamb (Massive Monster) for at least 5 hours, and watch short videos of three of the games you did not play. To reiterate, you don’t have to play all of these games, just one.

Oct. 7 (Section): Extended Discussion of Genre and Roguelikes

Week 3: Mechanics

Oct. 10: Play Super Mario Bros. (30 minutes) in the Weston Game Lab “Retro Corner” any time between 11:00am and 6:00pm

Oct. 11: Play Super Mario Bros. (30 minutes) and Braid (Jonathan Blow, 5-6 hours to complete the entire game, but you are only required to finish World 2 and World 3, try one level in each of the worlds, and watch the final level and epilogue on YouTube ). Read “Operational Logics and Playable Models” from How Pac-Man Eats (Noah Wardrip-Fruin, p. 3-15)

Oct. 13: Return of the Obra Dinn (Lucas Pope, 8 hours to complete the entire game, but you are only required to finish approximately 50% for class and watch the ending )

Oct. 14 (Section): Workshop Midterm “Critical Play” Video Essays

Oct. 16 (Sunday): UChicago Game Design RSO Unity Crash Course (optional)

Week 4: Narrative and Space I

Oct. 18: Play Myst: Masterpiece Edition (Rand and Robyn Miller, 5.5 hours) OR Doom (id Software, 1993, 5 hours). Read “Game Design as Narrative Architecture” (Henry Jenkins, online), and “ Doom , Myst , and the War for the Soul of Video Games” (Eric Rosenfield)

Oct. 19: BioShock (Xbox 360) play session in Weston Game Lab (pick one or play at home: 12:30-2:30pm, 3:00-5:00pm, and 5:30-7:30pm)

Oct. 20: Play BioShock (2K Games, play at least 2 hours and watch YouTube video of Frank Fontaine reveal and variable endings ) and read “Theorizing Navigable Space in Video Games” (Mark JP Wolf)

Oct. 21 (Section): Modding exercise: Tic-Tac-Toe, Checkers, Mancala, Up the River

Oct. 22: MIDTERM “CRITICAL PLAY” VIDEO ESSAYS DUE

Week 5: Narrative and Space II

Oct. 25: Play Gone Home (Fullbright, 2 hours) and Curtain (Dreamfeel, 40 minutes). Read “Reaching Toward Home Software Interface as Queer Orientation in the Video Game Curtain” (Whitney Pow, p. 43-56)

Oct. 26: GROUP FINAL PROJECT ABSTRACT DUE

Oct. 27: Play Unpacking (Witch Beam, 3.5 hours)

Oct. 28 (Section): Task management and roles, optimizing the design process

Week 6: Critical Making and Learning Objectives

Nov. 1: Special Session on critical making with Marcel O’Gorman (University of Waterloo and Critical Media Lab), reading TBD

Nov. 3: Special Session on serious games with Ashlyn Sparrow (University of Chicago and Weston Game Lab). Play: We Are Chicago (Culture Shock Games, 2 hours). Watch: “The Danger of a Single Story” (Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie). Read: Game Design Day: read Game Design Workshop (Tracy Fullerton, Chapter 1, “The Role of the Game Designer,” p. 2-21)

Nov. 4 (Section): Working on the Game Design Document

Nov. 6: RETRO VIDEO GAME REVIEW DUE BY TODAY

Week 7: Medium Specificity

Nov. 7: UChicago Game Design RSO Playtest (optional)

Nov. 8: Play The Stanley Parable: Ultra Deluxe (Crows Crows Crows, 2-5 hours) and read “Metaproceduralism: The Stanley Parable and The Legacies of Postmodern Metafiction” (Bradley Fest, Wide Screen , 2016)

Nov. 10: Play There Is No Game: Wrong Dimension (Draw Me A Pixel, 5 hours)

Nov. 11 (Section): Final Game Project Working Session

Week 8: Difficulty and Failure

Nov. 14: Difficult game play session (7-9pm)

Nov. 15: Discuss difficult games from shared play session (e.g., Ghost ‘n Goblins , Mega Man II , Dark Souls , Cuphead , etc.) and read “Difficulty” (Patrick Jagoda, p. 191-220)

Nov. 17: SPENT (Urban Ministries of Durham, 15 mins), Let’s Play: Ancient Greek Punishment (Pippin Barr, play for 5-10 mins), Queers in Love at the End of the World (Anna Anthropy, 10 seconds), QWOP (Bennett Foddy, 2 minutes), and read “Playing to Lose: Burnout and the Queer Art of Failing at Video Games” (Bo Ruberg, p. 135-157)

Nov. 18 (Section): Playtest Final Projects in Progress

Week 9: R&D (Rest and Development)

NO CLASSES THIS WEEK FROM NOVEMBER 21-27.

Week 10: Number of Players and Course Conclusion

Nov. 28: FINAL PROJECT VIDEO PRESENTATION (GROUP) DUE

Nov. 29: Read “Number of Players” (Clara Fernández-Vara, Introduction to Game Analysis , p. 88-93), “Cooperative Play” (Emma Witkowski, p. 89-96), and Alternate Reality Game videos ( Terrarium and Cene )

Dec. 1: Course Conclusion

Dec 7: FINAL PROJECT (GROUP) AND REFLECTION (INDIVIDUAL) DUE

CLASS EXPECTATIONS

Timely Arrival : We only meet a handful of times throughout the quarter so make the most of each session. Arrive on time!

Attendance : Attendance is required for this course. Students absent for more than one class risk lowering their participation grade; students with more than three unexcused absences will be given a final grade of incomplete or fail. However, if you are experiencing symptoms of illness, do not attend class, following the University of Chicago’s COVID-19 guidelines.

Preparation : Do the reading and take the gameplay seriously. Meaningful discussion depends on your engagement with our core texts and games. All readings and games are to be completed for the date on which they are listed.

Annotations and Notes : Bring your notes and annotated readings to class. You should get into the habit of writing down ideas that will strengthen your participation in our group exchange. Just because we’re discussing digital works, doesn’t mean you shouldn’t jot down ideas that will strengthen your participation in our group exchange. These notes may also serve as the starting point for your video essay and final project.

Questions and Office Hours : Always feel free to ask questions either in class or during office hours. A seminar can’t succeed without open discussion and curiosity!

Plagiarism : As the Office of the Vice President and Dean of Students notes, “It is contrary to ethics, to academic integrity, and to the spirit of intellectual inquiry to submit the statements, ideas, or work of others as one’s own. Such conduct is punishable under the University’s disciplinary system.” If you have any doubts about whether something constitutes plagiarism, you should contact me in advance of turning in work with plagiarized content. Academic dishonesty is a very serious offense — even if it is unintentional . The penalty for plagiarism might include both failure on the paper and failure of this course. Please review the University of Chicago’s official policy online. Keep in mind that academic dishonesty includes buying papers online, outsourcing your academic work to someone else (paid or unpaid), and submitting the same paper to more than one course. This is not an exhaustive list of the practices that constitute academic dishonesty and plagiarism. For more details, please consult the discussion of plagiarism and academic honesty in Doing Honest Work in College: How to Prepare Citations, Avoid Plagiarism, and Achieve Real Academic Success .

Cell Phones and Laptops : Cell phones must absolutely be turned off in class. While laptops are permitted, we recommend that anyone tempted to check in with social media, email, and other sites unrelated to class should stick to pen and paper for note-taking. If you have a compulsion about emailing, messaging, or checking social media during class (and cannot control yourself), you should absolutely refrain from bringing your laptop to class.

Late Assignments and Extensions : If any assignment is late, surpassing the deadline, it will immediately drop half a grade (e.g. from a B to B-). The grade will continue to drop at a comparable increment every 24 hours thereafter. We do grant extensions (especially in cases of major life events or emergencies) but you should talk to us about this possibility well in advance of the deadline.

Student Disability Services : We are committed to meeting the needs of all students. To arrange class-related accommodations, please see Student Disability Services prior to scheduling a meeting with me.

Attendance, Preparation, and Discussion in Class and Section: 15%
Blog Posts (4 Entries and Weekly Responses throughout quarter): 15%
Retro Game Review (Blog post, approximately 750 words): post by November 5: 5%
Midterm Critical Play Video Essay (approximately 10 minutes): 25%
Final Group Project: Group Abstract (300-400 words), Group Video Presentation (5-7 minutes), Group Project (variable but substantial), and Individual Reflection (2-3 pages): 40%

ASSIGNMENTS: WRITING AND PRESENTATIONS

Blog posts (4) and responses (weekly).

Over the course of the quarter, you will contribute to a class blog (located on this WordPress site) through original posts and responses to your peers. These posts are intended to influence and extend the conversations we have during our shared meetings. You are required to post at least 4 entries over the course of the quarter . Each entry should respond to that week’s video games or theoretical reading, expand substantively on an ongoing topic of class discussion (without simply reproducing or documenting an exchange), or call our attention to articles or media about related phenomena. The 4 minimum entries can be posted in any week with new content, over the course of the quarter, but you may post no more than one post a week for credit (so plan ahead!). Each post must also comment on a topic from the week in which it is posted (so you can’t, for instance, return to a topic from Week 2 on Week 8 unless it is in some way related to a current discussion). While the content of these entries can be wide-ranging and less formal than your video essay, you should observe formal citation standards and be mindful of your prose. You are also required to read posts by your classmates and respond briefly to at least one entry per week.

Retro Video Game Review (750 words)

As your special fifth blog post, you will write a critical review of a video game that we do not play together for class that was released during the fifth generation of consoles (1993–1998) or earlier. That means you could review a game that can be played for consoles that include the Atari 2600, Nintendo Entertainment System, Super Nintendo Entertainment System, Sega Genesis, PlayStation, Nintendo 64, or Sega Saturn. Many of these consoles are available for checkout at the Weston Game Lab in the Media Arts, Data, and Design Center, and numerous games are available for checkout at Crerar Library. You are also allowed to play an emulated version from home, for example a version of an older game that you find online or an NES or SNES game available for free on Nintendo Switch Online if you have that console.

Your task with this review is not merely to produce a rhetorical version of a “like” or create a consumer-level review that amounts to a “thumbs up/down.” Instead, we would like you to think about what more intelligent popular short-form writing about video games might look like. How can you use an overview of a game to raise interesting formal, social, and/or political issues? Or how can you elaborate a concept demonstrated by that game? Or does it do something non-obvious relative to genre? You should post your review on the class blog with a format of “Game Review” followed by your game title (e.g., “Game Review: The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past ”).

You can post your review any time prior to Week 6 (Deadline: November 6)

Midterm Critical Play Video Essay (approximately 10 minutes in duration)

For your midterm, you’ll perform an extended analysis of any video game that we have covered in class up to that point . As you explore your topic, you may turn to formal approaches as well as a cultural theory or philosophical methodology of your choice. The best analyses will combine 1.) medium-specific and formally-oriented reading practices, 2.) critical theories and methods such as historicism, feminism, critical race theory, Marxism, anthropological ethnography, genre theory, media theory, and/or another approach you’ve learned through your humanities or social science courses, and 3.) a clear definition of a concept that you are exploring and complicating.

Keep in mind that a persuasive analysis of different forms and media requires specific vocabularies and close reading practices proper to the work in question. For example, if you analyze a film, you must attend not only to plot or character development, but also to features such as shot distance, lighting, costume, mise-en-scène, cut type, sound effects, etc. When you think about a video game, on the other hand, you might consider elements including (but not limited to) aesthetic style, interface design, navigability, (non-)interactivity, game mechanics, platform affordances, networked dimensions, and so forth.

Instead of writing a paper, we are asking you to create a short video that includes your own verbal analysis combined with footage of gameplay that you are analyzing. You will receive additional instructions and resources for creating these essays. Samples of published versions of video essays, which analyze video games and film, include:

Ian Bryce Jones, “Special Effectivities” in [in]Transition: Journal of Videographic Film & Moving Image Studies 6.3, 2019.
Allison de Fren, “ Ex Machina : Questioning the Human Machine,” Vimeo .

We are not expecting video essays of this quality but they can serve as models. Both essays grapple with sophisticated theoretical concepts and questions via close readings and media examples. You might also find it helpful to look at YouTube videos reviews of games that analyze their formal or thematic issues, such as:

What’s So Great About That?, “ Night In The Woods : Do You Always Have A Choice?,” YouTube , 2017.
Ben Plays Games, “How Halo Makes Players Despair,” YouTube , 2020.

Note that there are elements of these videos that are appropriate to your videos, but that these are not precise models. The level of analysis in your videos should be directed not toward a generalist audience (as these videos are) but toward an audience familiar with the kinds of game studies frameworks and analytical categories you’ve been studying in this course. Your video essay should introduce your game, include a close reading, develop an argument, and foreground implications (the “So what?” of your argument). In addition to footage from your primary game case, you can include footage of other games if they serve your argument.

FINAL GROUP PROJECT ASSIGNMENTS

Final group project (variable length).

Collaboration is an increasingly vital skill in a cultural landscape dominated by digital technologies. While novels and poems are often written by individual authors, most videogames depend on partnerships among writers, artists, programmers, and designers.

For your final project, you will NOT write a traditional research paper, even as there will be an analytical dimension to your work. Instead, you will create a pre-approved creative project (which can take numerous forms) in assigned groups of approximately 4 team members each. Options might include a text adventure, a Twine game, a visual novel, an art game, a serious or educational game, a Game Design Document for a larger-scale project such as an Alternate Reality Game, a Machinima film, a game-oriented website, or a piece of interactive scholarship (in the style of journals such as Thresholds, Kairos , or Vectors ). To produce your work, you might consider turning to software such as WordPress, Photoshop, Final Cut Pro, Twine, Unity, Ren’Py, etc. In order to create a compelling digital work, you need NOT have substantial or indeed any technical knowledge . We are interested not only in the creativity of your project but also the quality of the associated writing and your engagement with theoretical concepts we have been exploring throughout the quarter.

We are adding two primary creative constraints to this final projects.

First, you should focus on 2D or multimedia games, and not on 3D games created in something like Unreal Game Engine, which would be too time-intensive relative to the amount of time you have in this course, and would shift you too much from game design and experimental making toward game development .

Second, your game or game-related project should in some way operate within the broad theme of “Apocalypse.” We will elaborate on this open-ended category, but it can related to a range of topics including the end of the world or the unfolding of a new world; post-apocalyptic, dystopian, or utopian genres; movement from apocalyptic events to mundane apocalyptic atmospheres; interpretations linked to the etymology of the word “apocalypse” that signals “revelation” or “uncovering”; or exploration of particular apocalypses linked to climate change, nuclear disaster, overpopulation, pandemics, AI uprisings, or alien invasions.

Rather than a complete departure from academic work and game theory, we would like you to engage in a process of what Walter Holland, Henry Jenkins, and Kurt Squire have called “theory by design.” In other words, instead of working through ideas in an expository fashion, you will do so through creative development. While we are not specifying a set quantity or size for your game or media project, the effort and production should be substantial.

Final Group Project Abstract

As a group, write a brief abstract for your final project that is due approximately a month before the project deadline. In this abstract, you should include several points, in bullet points:

Offer an overview “elevator pitch” of your project.
Describe the genre of your project and how it complicates or responds to its genre category in a meaningful way.
Offer an overview of your narrative or non-narrative scenario
Describe your core mechanics or gameplay interactions.
Describe the type of research, technical knowledge, and artistic skills that will be necessary to complete your work in the final weeks of the quarter.
Describe the division of labor within your group.
Describe what your project might teach the players. That is, what is the “So what?” of your game beyond entertainment of engagement.

You can adjust all of the above as you continue, but it’s useful to have a starting point, well in advance of the deadline. For groups that take a more creative route, you may also find it useful to write a brief outline of your narrative or description of your interface and core gameplay. For groups that take a more academic route, you might include an initial bibliography of additional readings.

Final Project Pitch (5-7 minute video)

During the final week of the class, as a group, you will hand in a roughly 5-7-minute video that introduces your final project. This assignment will allow you to present the features of your project in a clear and persuasive manner. The video should combine your group members speaking, alongside screenshots, gameplay video, or visual aids (e.g., PowerPoint slides) that convey your concept. Your project does NOT need to be completed, at this stage, but a mockup or selections from the final piece may help. This will be your last opportunity to receive feedback prior to turning in the final project.

Artist Statement (variable)

Along with your creative project, you should submit a collaborative artist statement that summarizes your work and elaborates on its significance. We will discuss what goes into an artist statement prior to your submission. For substantial and playable game projects, this statement need not be longer than a page or even a short paragraph. But think of this as your public advocacy on behalf of what your project does successfully.

Individual Reflection (2 pages)

Along with your actual group project, we would like each of you to turn in a brief (2 pages) individual reflection about your project. Here, you should comment on the collaborative experience. Collaboration is a difficult process but it can produce astonishing results. In writing this response, consider the following questions: What was it like working with peers from other disciplines? What were the benefits and challenges of collaborating on this kind of design project? What did you contribute to the group? What was the balance of work like in your group? What do you think you accomplished as a team?

2022 Syllabus
Critical Play Videos
Syllabus 2021

Browse Course Material

Course info.

Clara Fernandez-Vara

Departments

Comparative Media Studies/Writing

As Taught In

Game Design
Digital Media

Learning Resource Types

Introduction to videogame studies, written assignment 3.

This is an extended version of Assignment 2, where you elaborate on your argument from the first paper. You have to demonstrate that you understand the theory and how to apply it to the game, showing that you’re an expert both on the game and on the theoretical aspects that are relevant to your discussion. It may be the case that, in playing the game in more depth, you realize your initial assumptions are challenged—rebating or qualifying your previous work is a perfectly valid paper. You cannot take the previous assignment and paste in a couple more paragraphs—that will be an instant F.

Both assignments will evaluate your capacity to analyze the specific aspects of the game that you advance in the first paper, and providing novel insight on the game, i.e. your reader should learn something new about it.

For this assignment, expand and strengthen your argument by providing examples from gameplay, as well as discuss them using the conceptual frameworks from the class.

To write this assignment, you should have completed the game. If your game does not have an end state (e.g. MMOs or online modes of certain games), or is too long to finish within the given time frame, please talk to the instructor to negotiate what means to “finish” your game.

Your extended analysis should be between 1500-1700 words, double spaced in 12 point standard fonts (Times, Arial, etc.), and submitted in one of the following standard formats: .doc, .pdf or .rtf.

The grade of the assignment is broken down as follows:

Relevance (20%) - Providing a thesis statement which aims at generating insight on the game, and expanding on it. Superfluous retellings of plot, mere context descriptions, or disconnected pieces of data on the game usually indicate that you’re not analyzing the game but just rambling about it.
Organization (20%) - Your assignment should be well structured. Again, having an introductory paragraph and thesis statement and a conclusion are basic expectations in an assignment of this sort.
Discussion (20%) - How well you construct and support the argument that you want to make about the game. This usually entails (among other things): defining your terms (particularly when you’re borrowing them from the readings), including specific examples from the game(s), using the theories covered in class as support or contrast to your argument, and using counter-arguments to strengthen your discussion.
Clarity (20%) - How well you write your paper. Be concise and intelligible, with proper grammar and spelling. Please proofread your paper before handing it in.
References (20%) - Include your references at the end, including in-text citations. Use whichever citation format you prefer, just make it possible for your reader to find your sources. Include the URLs of webpages you may cite. The references must also include the game(s) you talk about, following the following model: Developer, Game Title. Publisher, Platform (Year).