statistical education research journal

Statistics Education Research Journal

Subject Area and Category

• Statistics and Probability

International Association for Statistical Education (IASE)

Publication type

Information.

How to publish in this journal

[email protected]

The set of journals have been ranked according to their SJR and divided into four equal groups, four quartiles. Q1 (green) comprises the quarter of the journals with the highest values, Q2 (yellow) the second highest values, Q3 (orange) the third highest values and Q4 (red) the lowest values.

The SJR is a size-independent prestige indicator that ranks journals by their 'average prestige per article'. It is based on the idea that 'all citations are not created equal'. SJR is a measure of scientific influence of journals that accounts for both the number of citations received by a journal and the importance or prestige of the journals where such citations come from It measures the scientific influence of the average article in a journal, it expresses how central to the global scientific discussion an average article of the journal is.

Evolution of the number of published documents. All types of documents are considered, including citable and non citable documents.

This indicator counts the number of citations received by documents from a journal and divides them by the total number of documents published in that journal. The chart shows the evolution of the average number of times documents published in a journal in the past two, three and four years have been cited in the current year. The two years line is equivalent to journal impact factor ™ (Thomson Reuters) metric.

Evolution of the total number of citations and journal's self-citations received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years. Journal Self-citation is defined as the number of citation from a journal citing article to articles published by the same journal.

Evolution of the number of total citation per document and external citation per document (i.e. journal self-citations removed) received by a journal's published documents during the three previous years. External citations are calculated by subtracting the number of self-citations from the total number of citations received by the journal’s documents.

International Collaboration accounts for the articles that have been produced by researchers from several countries. The chart shows the ratio of a journal's documents signed by researchers from more than one country; that is including more than one country address.

Not every article in a journal is considered primary research and therefore "citable", this chart shows the ratio of a journal's articles including substantial research (research articles, conference papers and reviews) in three year windows vs. those documents other than research articles, reviews and conference papers.

Ratio of a journal's items, grouped in three years windows, that have been cited at least once vs. those not cited during the following year.

Follow us on @ScimagoJR Scimago Lab , Copyright 2007-2024. Data Source: Scopus®

Cookie settings

Cookie Policy

Legal Notice

Privacy Policy

Volume 23 (2015) | Archive | Index | Interactive Computing Archive | Data Archive | Resources | Editorial Board | Guidelines for Authors | Guidelines for Data Contributors | Guidelines for Readers/Data Users | Home Page | Contact JSE | ASA Publications

Copyright © 2015 American Statistical Association. All rights reserved.

• Caption Contest
• Dollar Street
• Lifetime Achievement
• SPARKS Challenge
• Stats + Stories Lesson Plan Contest
• Presenter Guide
• Statistics Jobs
• Getting Started
• Chance News
• Fun Collection
• Resource Library
• Suggest Resource

Statistics Education Research Journal (SERJ)

SERJ  is a peer-reviewed electronic journal of the International Association for Statistical Education (IASE) and the International Statistical Institute (ISI).  SERJ  is published twice a year and is free.

SERJ  aims to advance research-based knowledge that can help to improve the teaching, learning, and understanding of statistics or probability at all educational levels and in both formal (classroom-based) and informal (out-of-classroom) contexts. Such research may examine, for example, cognitive, motivational, attitudinal, curricular, teaching-related, technology-related, organizational, or societal factors and processes that are related to the development and understanding of stochastic knowledge. In addition, research may focus on how people use or apply statistical and probabilistic information and ideas, broadly viewed.

Report a problem with this resource

You must Login or Register to post comments.

Emerging trends in statistics education

• Original Paper
• Published: 01 July 2023
• Volume 56 , pages 19–29, ( 2024 )

Cite this article

• Gail Burrill   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-9629-4100 1 &
• Maxine Pfannkuch   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2202-9678 2  

990 Accesses

1 Altmetric

Explore all metrics

The rapidly increasing capacity of technology to collect, organize, and manage data has spurred changes in the practice of statistics: new methods of collecting data, large data sets, new forms of data, different ways to visualize and represent data, and recognition of the importance of being able to understand and to communicate data-based arguments and findings from the perspective of data consumers and data producers. Using a narrative review based on Delphi methods, wee asked leading members of the statistics education community to describe trends they have observed in the field and to identify interesting and relevant papers related to those trends. We received 24 responses and over 200 suggestions for papers. Our analysis included papers published in journals, book chapters, conference proceedings, handbooks, and curricular documents. We focused on future directions for statistics education research, and thus included articles based on opinion or principles if the arguments made a strong case supported by evidence as to why the idea was needed. From our analysis of 50 papers in this review, we suggest four emerging themes in statistics education research, challenging what should be taught and suggesting new ways of thinking about the teaching and learning of statistics: Data Science, Visibilizing Statistical Concepts, Social Statistics, and New Contexts for Learning. The review focuses on articles from 2017-mid 2022 and highlights the relevance and importance of each theme. Our choice of a particularly important paper for each theme is annotated in the references.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Russian Federation)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

International Perspectives on the Teaching and Learning of Statistics

Revolutions in Teaching and Learning Statistics: A Collection of Reflections

Statistics education research.

Andre, M., & Lavicza, Z. (2019). Technology changing statistics education: Defining possibilities, opportunities and obligations. Electronic Journal of Mathematics and Technology, 13 (3), 253–264.

Google Scholar  

Arnold, P., & Franklin, C. (2021). What makes a good statistical question? Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education, 29 (1), 122–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/26939169.2021.1877582

Article   Google Scholar  

Bargaliotti, A., Franklin, C., Arnold, P., Gould, R., Johnson, S., Perez, L., & Spangler, D. (2020). guidelines for assessment and instruction in statistics education II (GAISE II)

Biehler, R., Ben-Zvi, D., Bakker, A., & Makar, K. (2013). Technology for enhancing statistical reasoning at the school level. In M. A. Clement, A. J. Bishop, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & A. Y. L. Leung (Eds.), Third international handbook on mathematics education (pp. 643–689). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4684-2_21

Ben-Zvi, D., Makar, K., & Garfield, J. (Eds.). (2018). International handbook of research in statistics education . Springer. https://doi.org/10.10007/978-3-319-66195-7 .

Biehler, R., Frischemeier, D., Reading, C., & Shaughnessy, J. M. (2018). Reasoning about data. In D. Ben-Zvi, K. Makar, & J. Garfield (Eds.), International handbook of research in statistics education (pp.139–192). Springer.

Boels, L., Bakker, A., & Drijvers, P. (2019). Eye-tracking secondary school students’ strategies when interpreting statistical graphs. In M. Graven, H. Venkat, A. Essien, & P. Vale (Eds.), Proceedings of the 43rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Pretoria, South Africa, July 2019 (Vol.2, pp.113–120). PME.

Burrill, G. (2018). Building concept images of fundamental ideas in statistics: the role of technology. G. Burrill, & D. Ben-Zvi (Eds.), Topics and trends in current statistics education research: International perspectives. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03472-6_6

Burrill, G. (2020). Statistical literacy and quantitative reasoning: Rethinking the curriculum. In P. Arnold (Ed.), New skills in the changing world of statistics education. Proceedings of Roundtable conference of the International Association for Statistical Education (IASE) July 2020 . https://doi.org/10.52041/iase.20104

Burrill, G., & Dick, T. (2022). Connecting mathematics to the world: Engaging students with data science. In J. Morska, & A. Rogerson (Eds.). Building on the past to prepare for the future: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference of The Mathematics Education for the Future Project , King’s College, Cambridge.

Brown, T., Franklin, C., & Sierra, L. (2021). What is risk know-how? Significance, 18 (6), 30–33.

Callingham, R., & Watson, J. (2017). The development of statistical literacy at school. Statistics Education Research Journal, 16 (1), 181–201. https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v16i1.223

Dvir, M., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2018). The role of model comparison in young learners’ reasoning with statistical models and modeling. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 50 (7), 1183–1196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0987-4

Case, C., & Jacobbe, T. (2018). A framework to characterize student difficulties in learning inference from a simulation-based approach. Statistics Education Research Journal, 17 (2), 9–29. https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v17i2.156

Cobb, G., & Moore, D. (1997). Mathematics, statistics, and teaching. American Mathematical Monthly , 104 (9), 801–823. https://doi.org/10.2307/2975286 .

Cobb, G. (2007). The introductory statistics course: A ptolemaic curriculum? Technology Innovations in Statistics Education . https://doi.org/10.5070/T511000028

Engel, J., & Wilhelm, A. (2021). Data and statistics as basis for political decisions: Lessons to be learnt from the COVID-19 pandemic. In R. Helenius, & E. Falck (Eds.), Statistics education in the era of data science. Proceedings of the Satellite conference of the International Association for Statistical Education (IASE), Aug–Sept 2021 .

Engel, J., Campos, P., Nicholson, J., Ridgway, J., & Teixeira, S. (2020). Visualizing multivariate data: Graphs that tell stories. In P. Arnold (Ed.), New skills in the changing world of statistics education. Proceedings of the Roundtable Conference of the International Association for Statistical Education (IASE), July 2020

Erickson, T., Wilkerson, M., Finzer, W., & Reichsman, F. (2019). Data moves. Technology Innovations in Statistics Education . https://doi.org/10.5070/T5121038001 . This paper defines and gives examples of data moves, actions made possible by digital tools designed to facilitate the manipulation and analysis of large, complex datasets. The authors argue data moves should be part of data analysis, give four recommendations to consider in shaping curriculum and instruction, and identify potential research questions that should be addressed in moving forward.

Fergusson, A., & Pfannkuch, M. (2022). Introducing high school statistics teachers to predictive modelling and APIs using code-driven tools. Statistics Education Research Journal, 21 (2), 8–8. https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v21i2.49

Fleischer, Y., Biehler, R., & Schulte, C. (2022). Teaching and learning data-driven machine learning with educationally designed Jupyter Notebooks. Statistics Education Research Journal, 21 (2),7–7.

Fielding-Wells, J. (2018). Dot plots and hat plots: Supporting young students emerging understandings of distribution, center and variability through modeling. ZDM-Mathematics Education, 50 (7), 1125–1138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0961-1

Findley, K., & Lyford, A. (2019). Investigating students’ reasoning about sampling distributions through a resource perspective. Statistics Education Research Journal, 18 (1), 26–45. https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v18i1.148

Frischemeier, D., & Biehler, R. (2018). Pre-service teachers comparing groups with TinkerPlots–An exploratory laboratory study. Statistics Education Research Journal, 17 (1), 35–60. https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v16i2.192

Fergusson, A., & Wild, C. (2021). On traversing the data landscape: Introducing APIs to data-science students. Teaching Statistics, 43 (1), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/test.12266

Gal, I. (2002). Statistical literacy: Meanings, components, responsibilities. International Statistical Review , 70 (1), 1–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2002.tb00336.x .

Gal, I., & Geiger, V. (2022). Welcome to the era of vague news: A study of the demands of statistical and mathematical products in the COVID-19 pandemic media. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 111 (1), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-022-10151-7 . This research describes a rigorous systematic analysis of actual statistical and mathematical demands of diverse media items with which people need to engage. The authors identify nine categories of media demands and note that most of the communication is done in words. The paper lists its substantial contributions to statistics education including the urgent need to revise current curricula, particularly in the area of text-based media items.

Gould, R., Bargagliotti, A., & Johnson, T. (2017). An analysis of secondary teachers’ reasoning with participatory sensing data. Statistics Education Research Journal, 16 (2), 305–334. https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v16i2.194

Gould, R. (2021). Toward data-scientific thinking. Teaching Statistics, 43 (1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/test.12267 . Gould argues with explication that data science curricula should center on developing students' “data scientific thinking,” which consists of a core of statistical thinking, components of computational thinking, and “a dash of mathematical thinking.” He describes an example of such a curriculum, and the final section provides consequences and challenges that arise from this particular view of data science.

Horton, N., Chao, J., Finzer, W., & Palmer, P. (2022). Spam four ways: Making sense of text data. CHANCE, 35 (2), 32–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/09332480.2022.2066414

Horton, N. J., & Hardin, J. S. (2021). Integrating computing in the statistics and data science curriculum: Creative structures, novel skills and habits, and ways to teach computational thinking. Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education, 29 , S1–S3. https://doi.org/10.1080/10691898.2020.1870416

Kazak, S., Pratt, D., & Gökce, R. (2018). Sixth grade students’ emerging practices of data modelling. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 50 (7), 1151–1163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0988-3

Lehrer, R., & English, L. (2018). Introducing children to modeling variability. In D. Ben-Zvi, K. Makar, & J. Garfield (Eds.), International handbook of research in statistics education (pp. 229–260). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66195-7 The article focuses on a data modeling framework, used by many researchers in the field, which suggests how approximations to professional practices of modeling and inference can be introduced to elementary students. Based on diverse research, the authors argue for the need to involve students in practices of inquiry, visualizing through data displays and attending to modeling and measuring variability.

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Lee, H., Mojica, G., Thrasher, E., & Baumgartner, P. (2022). Investigating data like a data scientist: Key practices and processes. Statistics Education Research Journal, 21 (2), 3–3. https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v21i2.4

Leavy, A., & Hourigan, M. (2018). Inscriptional capacities and representations of young children engaged in data collection during a statistical investigation. In A. Leavy, M. Meletiou-Mavrotheris, & E. Paparistodemou (Eds.), Statistics in early childhood and primary education: Supporting early statistical and probabilistic thinking (pp.89–107). Springer.

Leavy, A., Meletiou-Mavrotheris, M., & Paparistodemou, E. (Eds.). (2018). Statistics in early childhood and primary education: Supporting early statistical and probabilistic thinking Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1044-7

Lee, V. R., & Wilkerson, M. (2018). Data use by middle and secondary students in the digital age: A status report and future prospects . Commissioned Paper for the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Board on Science Education, Committee on Science Investigations and Engineering Design for Grades 6–12. Washington, D.C.Although directed at science education, this commissioned paper discusses new and emerging forms of data made possible by advances in technology from an interdisciplinary perspective. The review puts into context how the nature of data available to students is changing, for example, sourced data from public datasets or photograph data. The discussion includes implications for classroom instruction

Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution . http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173

Martignon, L., Frischemeier, D., McDowell, M., & Christoph Till, T. (2022). Dynamic, interactive trees and icon arrays for visualizing risks in civic statistics. In J. Ridgway (Ed.), Statistics for empowerment and social engagement: Teaching civic statistics to develop informed citizens (pp. 477–501). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20748-8_19

Makar, K., & Rubin, A. (2018). Learning about statistical inference. In D. Ben-Zvi, K. Makar, & J. Garfield (Eds.), International handbook of research in statistics education (pp 261–294). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66195-7_8

Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum . Wellngton, NZ: Learning Media.

Moore, D. (1997). New pedagogy and new content: The case of statistics. International Statistical Review , 65 (2), 123–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.1997.tb00390.x .

Noll, J., Clement, K., Dolor, J., Kirin, D., & Petersen, M. (2018). Students’ use of narrative when constructing statistical models in TinkerPlots. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 50 (7), 1267–1280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0981-x . Set in narrative discourse literature, the authors show how students privileged a more communicative and narrative form of thinking to construct statistical models in TinkerPlots. Because the students preferred models that were narrative in nature and their use of narrative seemed to support them toward productive statistical modeling, their findings have important pedagogical implications for teaching and curricula.

ProCivicStat, P. (2018). Engaging civic statistics: A call for action and recommendations. A product of the ProCivicStat Project. http://IASE-web.org/ISLP/PCS

Oslington, G., Mulligan, J., & Van Bergen, P. (2018). Young children’s reasoning through data exploration. In V. Kinnear, M. Y. Lai, & T. Muir (Eds.), Forging connections in early mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 191–212). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7153-9_11

Pfannkuch, M., Ben–Zvi, D., & Budgett, S. (2018). Innovations in statistical modeling to connect data, chance and context. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 50 (7), 1113–1123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0989-2

Pfannkuch, M. (2018). Reimagining curriculum approaches. In D. Ben-Zvi, K. Makar, & J. Garfield (Eds.), International handbook of research in statistics education (pp.387–413). Springer. This overview describes why and how statistical modeling is a research environment to learn about students’ statistical reasoning; statistical modeling provides a way to bridge data, chance, and context as a holistic approach for developing key statistical ideas. The nature and purposes for statistical modeling as well as several theoretical frameworks are discussed from this perspective

Podworny, S., Fleischer, Y., & Hüsing, S. (2022). Grade 6 students’ perception and use of data-based decision trees. In S. A. Peters, L. Zapata-Cardona, F. Bonafini & A. Fan (Eds.), Bridging the gap: Empowering and educating today’s learners in statistics. Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Teaching Statistics, Rosario, Argentina . https://doi.org/10.52041/iase.icots11.T2H3

Puig, A., & Adams, C. (2018). Delphi technique. In B. Frey (Ed.), The sage encyclopedia of educational research, measurement, and evaluation . Washington, DC: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139

Ridgway, J. (Ed.). (2022). Statistics for empowerment and social engagement: Teaching civic statistics to develop informed citizens Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20748-8

Rubel, L., Nicol, C., & Chronaki, A. (2021). A critical mathematics perspective on reading data visualizations. Reimagining through reformatting, reframing, and renarrating. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 108 (1–2), 249–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10087-4

Rubel, L., Hall-Wiekert, M., & Lim, V. (2017). Making space for place: Mapping tools and practices to teach for spatial justice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 26 (4), 643–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2017.1336440

Souza, L., & Araújo, J. (2022). Fake news phenomenon: Formation of beliefs under pragmatic optics and mathematical education. Acta Scientiae, 24 , 1–29. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.6602

Souza, L., Lopes, C., & Fitzallen, N. (2020). Creative insubordination in statistics teaching: Possibilities to go beyond statistical literacy. Statistics Education Research Journal, 19 (1), 73–91. https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v19i1.120 . The paper reports on a study showing how two students become agents of change for a problem they identified in their social and cultural context, illustrating how data can be used to empower and transform lives. The authors used an innovative narrative analysis method reporting their results through a google translation of the Portuguese written narrative to maintain cultural connections.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 2nd Ed. Washington, DC: Sage Publications.

Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis addision-wesley. Reading, Ma, 688 , 581–582.

Utts, J. (2021). Enhancing data science ethics through statistical education and practice. International Statistics Review, 89 (1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/insr.12446

van Dijke-Droogers, M., Drijvers, P., & Bakker, A. (2020). Repeated sampling with a black box to make informal statistical inference accessible. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 22 (2), 116–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2019.1617025

Weiland, T. (2017). Problematizing statistical literacy: An intersection of critical and statistical literacies. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96 (1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9764-5

Wilson, S., Floden, R., & Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2001). Teacher preparation research: Current knowledge, gaps and recommendations . Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.

Wilkerson, M. H., & Laina, V. (2018). Middle school students’ reasoning about data and context through storytelling with repurposed local data. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 50 (7), 1223–1235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0974-9

Wild, C., & Pfannkuch, M. (1999). Statistical thinking in empirical inquiry. International Statistical Review , 67 (3), 223–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.1999.tb00442.x .

Wild, C., Utts, J., & Horton, N. (2018). What is statistics? In D. Ben-Zvi, D. K. Makar, & J. Garfield (Eds.), International handbook of research in statistics education (pp.5–36). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66195-7_1

Wild, C. (2018). Gaining iNZights from data. In M. A. Sorto, A. White, & L. Guyot (Eds.), Looking back, looking forward. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Teaching Statistics (ICOTS10), July 2018, Kyoto, Japan .

Watson, J. M. (2006). Statistical literacy at school: Growth and goals . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Zieffler, A., Justice, N., delMas, R., & Huberty, M. (2021). The use of algorithmic models to develop secondary teachers’ understanding of the statistical modeling process. Journal of Statistics and Data Science Education, 29 (1), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/26939169.2021.1900759

Zapata-Cardona, L. (2018). Students’ construction and use of statistical models: A socio-critical perspective. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 50 (7), 1213–1222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0967-8

Zieffler, A., Garfield, J., & Fry, E. (2018). What is statistics education? In D. Ben-Zvi, K. Makar & J. Garfield (Eds.), International handbook of research in statistics education (pp.37–70). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66195-7_2

Download references

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Program in Mathematics Education, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA

Gail Burrill

The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

Maxine Pfannkuch

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gail Burrill .

Additional information

Publisher’s note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Burrill, G., Pfannkuch, M. Emerging trends in statistics education. ZDM Mathematics Education 56 , 19–29 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01501-7

Download citation

Accepted : 04 June 2023

Published : 01 July 2023

Issue Date : February 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01501-7

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Civic statistics
• Data science
• Social justice
• Statistical concepts
• Statistical modeling
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Challenge-obstacle stressors and cyberloafing among higher vocational education students: the moderating role of smartphone addiction and maladaptive.

• 1 Department of Didactics and School Organization, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
• 2 Laboratory for Cognition, Health, Training and Interaction Among Humans, Animals and Machines, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
• 3 Department of English Philology, University of Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain

The start of higher vocational education and training is a new stage for students with a challenge between theoretical classes and the new expectations and demands of companies during the internship period. To understand some of the implications of stress on cyberloafing, we can distinguish between stress perceived as an obstacle that can be overcome – challenge stress – or as a threat that can block work performance – obstacle stress – and stress perceived as an obstacle that can be overcome – challenge stress – or as a threat that can block work performance – obstacle stress-. The aim of this research is to find out the relationships between challenge-obstacle stress in Cyberloafing, as well as the moderating effect of Smartphone Addiction and Maladaptive. In this study, the Challenge-Hindrance Stressors, Smartphone addiction scale-short version (SAS-SV) instrument, the Maladaptive subscale of the Cognitive Emotional Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) and Cyberloafing were applied to 403 upper-level vocational training students from different secondary schools in all provinces of the autonomous community of Andalusia, Spain, distributed throughout the provinces that make up this autonomous community. The findings show that students’ challenge stressors do not increase Cyberloafing, enabling them to cope with the academic demands and work challenges during the theory and internship period. On the contrary, obstacle stressors generate stressful situations that undermine the acquisition of objectives and development of academic competences. In our research we observe that challenge-obstacle stressors have a disparate influence on cyberloafing. Challenge stressors are negatively related to Maladaptive. The same is not true for obstacle stressors.

1 Introduction

In recent decades, vocational education and training has been seen as a type of education that, through training for the performance of a professional activity, can help to meet the challenges of digitalization and globalization ( Bürgi and Gonon, 2021 ). According to the OECD (2018) Getting Skills Right: Spain reports on the State of the Education System of the Spanish Ministry of Education and Vocational Training, the number of jobs generated by digitalization and the ecological transition will be the two major transforming elements of the economic model ( Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional (MEFP), 2021 ; Ley Orgánica, 2022 ). These jobs will need to be filled by competent and professionally qualified people, through training scenarios that connect theoretical knowledge with practical skills and vice versa. Forecasts for Spain in 2025 indicate that 49% of jobs will require intermediate skills and only 14% of jobs will require low skills.

The vocational education and training system has had to be transformed in order to train students through the development of professional competences. These competences facilitate entry into the world of work, which today is characterized by continuous change ( Virgós et al., 2022 ). For this changing world, vocational education is shaped by the rationality of school and the rationality of workplace-based learning ( Schaap et al., 2012 ). The former is related to theoretical knowledge, while the latter is related to practical knowledge ( Ferm, 2021 ). Both knowledge is essential for the development of professional competences ( Bouw et al., 2021 ) and, for this development, a link between theory and practice is required. Theoretical knowledge carries more weight in the field of education, while practical knowledge is more important in the work context ( Billett, 2014 ). In both contexts, however, the use of ICT-supported communication platforms appears in relation to productivity and the challenges of digitalization. This incorporation has changed contemporary organizations ( Tandon et al., 2021 ) and, since its beginning, there has been debate about the benefits and drawbacks that new technologies can bring in relation to their productive or non-productive use during working hours. Thus, we enter into the issue of time spent using technologies for activities that bring personal benefit unrelated to work performance ( Batabyal and Bhal, 2020 ; Tandon et al., 2021 ), even in the case of students in academic training. This behavior is referred to as Cyberloafing ( Lim, 2002 ; Reizer et al., 2022 ) and is generally considered to be a counterproductive behavior that can occur during school hours. Taking into consideration the influence of stressors during theoretical and practical classes in vocational training, which can lead to lower academic performance and dropout ( Lizarte and Gijón, 2022a , b ), we will focus on how stressors are related to cyberloafing and smartphone addiction and maladaptation as mediating variables.

The relevance of the article presented is based on the scarcity of previous studies that focus on higher vocational training students, due to the fragmentation of these teachings in very varied professional areas (professional families in their denomination in Spain), which has been highlighted by studies such as the one carried out by the Bankia Dual Foundation for the period 2005–2017 or the recent review by Toepper et al. (2022) , which points to the probable causes of this scarce research in higher VET, which may also be due to the difficulty of transferring their results to general recommendations to be applied in education systems, due to the high contextualization of these studies.

1.1 Cyberloafing in the classroom

It is a proven fact that technological innovations (multimedia applications, web technologies and next-generation educational applications) enable courses to be delivered more effectively and interactively ( Ersoy et al., 2016 ; Johnson et al., 2023 ). However, misuse of the internet in the classroom can lead to distraction and disconnection from the lesson the teacher is teaching ( Wu and Xie, 2018 ; Flanigan and Babchuk, 2022 ). In relation to the above statement, accessing applications via the internet in the classroom can lead to cyberloafing in students ( Baturay and Toker, 2015 ; Akgün, 2020 ), leading in some cases to lower academic performance, decreased motivation and discipline problems ( Junco and Cotten, 2012 ; Farivar and Richardson, 2018 ; Gökçearslan et al., 2018 ). However, some research considers cyberloafing to have certain positive effects, such as stress reduction and relaxation during work sessions and the completion of large amounts of work tasks in the workplace ( Yildiz and Saritepeci, 2019 ). The problem that arises in practice is to be able to quantify the negative or positive balance of cyberloafing for learning, both on a general and individualized level, as well as to develop teaching strategies for the management of cyberloafing as a didactic tool, although this will probably be closely related to the teaching style of the teacher and the context of each subject and educational stage.

1.2 Stress in der Berufsausbildung

In relation to stress, the change involved in the transition from secondary school to vocational training has been studied by a number of authors ( Steinmann, 2005 ; Pusceddu, 2016 ; Hösli et al., 2018 ; Böhn and Deutscher, 2022 ). It has become clear that for many students, this new stage can be more sensitive to stress, due to the cognitive, affective, biological and social changes that occur at this stage of life. Vocational trainees have to fulfil the role of a student during theoretical lessons and the new expectations and demands of the company during the traineeship ( Berweger et al., 2013 ; Leu, 2014 ). For this reason, it is often more time-consuming for vocational students to regulate their stress in certain academic situations during the internship period ( Schulten and Wussler, 2013 ). The use of different coping strategies will explain individual differences in relation to adapting to the stress required by these new educational demands ( Hernández et al., 2023 ). See Figure 1 to visualise the hypothetical model of relationships that we will describe below.

Figure 1 . Hypothesized model of relationships among stressors, smartphone addiction, Maladaptive, and cyberloafing.

1.3 Challenge-hindrance stressors and cyberloafing

To understand some implications of stress on cyberloafing, we can distinguish between stress perceived as an obstacle that can be overcome -challenge stress- or as a threat that can block job performance -hindrance stress- ( LePine et al., 2005 ; Podsakoff et al., 2007 ; Karatepe et al., 2018 ; Afshari et al., 2022 ). In the first case -challenge-, the effects of this type of stress can help to reconstitute and boost individual growth, including high demands of work, responsibility and time pressure.

Indeed, the achievement of work objectives is related, in part, to the type of stressors that exist in the workplace and their perception. Some studies indicate that challenge stressors are associated with positive employee behaviors, with improved team performance, increased motivation and effort boosting ( Kassam et al., 2009 ; Pearsall et al., 2009 ). However, obstacle stressors hinder goal achievement, role ambiguity and excessive concern for job security ( Kassam et al., 2009 ; Pearsall et al., 2009 ; Mazzola and Disselhorst, 2019 ). Thus, challenging and hindering stressors influence learning, affecting the level of development of professional competences during studies ( Lizarte, 2021 ; Lizarte and Gijón, 2022a ). From a general perspective, stress has an adaptive and mainly psychological character that can manifest itself in an imbalance that results in the development of coping or discarding actions in the face of academic demands ( Vorontsova et al., 2022 ), regardless of whether the learning takes place in the classroom or during internships ( Gijón, 2020 ). If stress is severe and prolonged in students, it can reduce academic performance, decrease academic and social integration and may even increase the likelihood of dropping out of school ( Amanvermez et al., 2022 ; Ang et al., 2022 ; Lizarte and Gijón, 2022a ).

In certain situations, cyberloafing can be an isolating behavior ( Askew et al., 2019 ; Tandon et al., 2021 ), a form of procrastination during lectures ( Lowe-Calverley and Grieve, 2017 ), which can lead to decreased task completion satisfaction ( Khansa et al., 2017 ) and increased emotional exhaustion ( Koay and Soh, 2018 ). Thus, cyberloafing can be used by students as an avoidance strategy to temporarily avoid the stressful demands of certain actions in theory and practice classes. Therefore, we propose the following hypothesis:

H1 : Obstacle stressors are positively related to cyberloafing.

Considering that challenge stressors motivate workers to exert effort and deploy their capacity to cope with work demands and goal fulfillment ( Umer et al., 2022 ) and that obstacle stressors generate stress levels that hinder good performance and task achievement ( Kassam et al., 2009 ; Kim and Beehr, 2020 ), it can be inferred that the teacher’s assessment of these situations will lead him/her to select appropriate methodologies to avoid cyberloafing as far as possible. One of the most commonly used methodologies in vocational training is project work, which could be appropriate to combat the negative effects of cyberloafing. This pedagogical approach refers to a didactic methodology by which one tries to acquire and develop competences through the realization of a project elaborated individually or in a group (Project-Based Learning). Project work enables cooperative learning and helps students to develop teamwork skills and improve the level of goal achievement ( Lau et al., 2013 ). Thus, students could be more focused on achieving their goals, spending less time on cyberloafing. We therefore propose the hypothesis:

H2 : Challenge stressors will be negatively related to cyberloafing.

1.4 Smartphone addiction and Maladaptive as mediating variables

Both challenge and obstacle stress affect academic performance ( Kötter et al., 2017 ) and the acquisition of vocational competences during vocational studies ( Lizarte and Gijón, 2022b ). The impact of this ongoing stress during vocational training and the well-being of vocational students has not been sufficiently explored so far.

One of the issues of greatest interest in relation to stress, academic performance and cyberloafing is the use of mobile devices, especially the smartphone. While the use of smartphones for learning activities provides teaching opportunities, it can also have a negative impact on learning environments and processes ( Wagner et al., 2012 ). Thus, cyberloafing behavior can lead to disengagement with class and reduced motivation ( Gökçearslan et al., 2018 ). Cyberloafing behavior and smartphone addiction might be related as both are linked to addictive behavior ( Gökçearslan et al., 2016 , 2018 ) and avoidance of situations that can generate stress by fulfilling learning activities developed in class ( Yildiz and Saritepeci, 2019 ). In this context, we propose the following hypothesis:

H3 : Challenge stressors will be negatively related to smartphone addiction. H4 : Obstacle stressors will be positively related to smartphone addiction.

Since stress is related to cyberloafing, a reduction of stress would reduce the reasons for cyberloafing ( Lim and Teo, 2005 ). Considering that hindrance stress increases negative emotions and cyberloafing ( Koay et al., 2017 ), smartphone addiction could be related to cyberloafing ( Gökçearslan et al., 2016 , 2018 ). Considering that mobile phone addiction takes the form of uncontrollable use of smartphones ( Park and Park 2017 ; Saritepeci, 2020 ), we could assume that students with high levels of smartphone addiction during lessons would increase levels of cyberloafing. Students with higher levels of smartphone addiction influenced by higher levels of stress are likely to be less responsive to academic demands, thus cyberloafing may increase. Two hypotheses derive from these statements:

H5 : Challenge stressors will gain a positive indirect relationship with cyberloafing, mediated by Smartphone addiction. H6 : Obstacle stressors will gain a positive indirect relationship with cyberloafing, mediated by Smartphone addiction. H7 : Smartphone addiction will be positively related to cyberloafing.

Reactions to stressful situations are associated with Maladaptive rather than adaptive cognitive emotional regulation strategies ( Kraaij et al., 2003 ). When people experience more stressors, they tend to develop Maladaptive cognitive emotional regulation strategies to cope with these stressors ( Kraaij et al., 2003 ). Challenging stressors tend to favor positive behaviors and increase effort ( Pearsall et al., 2009 ), so that self-blame, rumination, catastrophizing and blaming others (Maladaptive subscale) will have low values. However, obstacle stressors would increase the values of the Maladaptive subscale ( Wallace et al., 2009 ; Sawhney and Michel, 2022 ). These facts allow us to indicate that challenge stressors could reduce the values of the Maladaptive scale and obstacle stressors would increase the values obtained when applying the Maladaptive scale ( Wallace et al., 2009 ; Sawhney and Michel, 2022 ).

The use of Maladaptive emotional regulation strategies is associated with increased stress symptoms ( Garnefski et al., 2001 ) and the use of adaptive emotional regulation strategies is associated with lower stress and higher self-esteem ( Cutuli, 2014 ). Hence, the use of unadaptive emotional regulation strategies may increase smartphone addiction (Use this paragraph for analysis and conclusions). We propose:

H8 : Challenging stressors will be negatively related to the Maladaptive. H9 : Obstacle stressors will be positively related to the Maladaptive. H10 : Smartphone addiction will be positively related to Maladaptive.

Based on the above, we can assume that increasing the means of access to ICT tools in theory and practice classes may promote cyberloafing behaviors ( Akbulut et al., 2017 ; Saritepeci, 2020 ). Thus, considering that passive coping tends to be more Maladaptive, it could hinder growth opportunities, lower engagement and performance of students in situations that require some degree of stress for goal achievement ( Wallace et al., 2009 ). Thus, the use of Maladaptive emotional regulation strategies in class would promote cyberloafing ( Metin and Demirtepe, 2021 ).

We therefore propose:

H11 : Challenge stressors will gain a positive indirect relationship with cyberloafing, mediated by the Maladaptive. H12 : Obstacle stressors will have a positive indirect relationship with cyberloafing, mediated by the Maladaptive. H13 : Maladaptive will relate positively to cyberloafing.

2.1 Participants

The instruments were sent to 44 Secondary Schools teaching Higher Level Training Cycles in all the provinces that make up the Andalusian Autonomous Community during the 2021/22 academic year. A response of 427 questionnaires was obtained, of which 24 were excluded because they were incomplete. The final sample that participated in this study is 403 students of Higher Vocational Training, of which 46.15% are women and 53.85% are men, aged between 16 and 59 years old.

Table 1 shows the descriptive analysis of the demographic variables: in relation to the degree, 40.94% of the students are in the first year – corresponding to theory classes – while 59.06% are in the second year – work experience period in a company. As for the influence on the decision to enroll in Vocational Training, 75.68% did so because of the job opportunities, 16.63% because of the academic program, 4.47% because of friends and only 3.22% because of the possibility of participating in Erasmus+ or internationalization projects.

Table 1 . Descriptive of socio-demographic variables.

2.2 Instruments

Obstacle and challenge stressors were measured using Cavanaugh et al. (2000) scale, which consists of 11 items. The obstacle stressors consist of 5 items (e.g., “Inability to clearly understand what is expected of me at work”) and the challenge stressors consist of 6 items (e.g., “Time pressures I experience”). Respondents were asked to rate the degree of stress at work for each item on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = not at all stressful, 5 = very stressful). The scores of the stress-challenge and stress-obstacle subscales were computed by averaging the items. Cronbach’s alpha value (Cronbach’s α) of the obstacle stressors was 0.83 and that of the challenge stressors was 0.85.

The Smartphone addiction scale-short version (SAS-SV) instrument by Kwon et al. (2013) is used to measure the level of smartphone addiction. The SAS-SV instrument is composed of 10 items (e.g., “Having a hard time concentrating in class while doing assignments, or while working due to smartphone use”). The questions were answered on a 6-point Likert scale, where 1 is “Strongly disagree” and 6 is “Strongly agree,” according to the self-report. Possible scores range from 10 to 60. Higher overall scores show a higher degree of smartphone addiction ( Kwon et al., 2013 ). Cronbach’s alpha value (Cronbach’s α) for this scale was 0.92.

The Cognitive Emotional Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) instrument was used to measure the Maladaptive subscale. The CERQ is used to measure nine types of specific cognitive skills. Self-blame, rumination, catastrophizing and blaming others are considered Maladaptive subscales. However, acceptance, positive refocusing, refocus on planning, positive reappraisal, and putting into perspective are considered adaptive subscales ( Garnefski et al., 2002 ). The CERQ is composed of 36 items with 5-point Likert-type responses (1 = almost never to 5 = almost always). Higher scores indicate higher frequency of use of the specific cognitive strategy being measured. In our research only the Maladaptive subscale was adopted. Cronbach’s alpha value (Cronbach’s α) for this subscale was 0.93.

Lim’s (2002) 11-item scale (e.g., “visit sports-related websites”) was used to measure cyberloafing. Respondents were asked to rate their cyberloafing during school hours on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = not at all to 5 = extremely). Cronbach’s alpha value (Cronbach’s α) for this scale was 0.93.

2.3 Procedures

The research presented here was structured in four phases. In the first – instrument selection – the questionnaires indicated in the previous section were tailored and adapted for online application. The questionnaire included an explanation of the research, assuring the anonymity of the participants and the confidentiality of the data. In the second phase – sample design – a criterion sampling was carried out for the application of the adapted online instruments. For this purpose, a list was drawn up of educational centers offering full teaching of higher level training cycles belonging to the eight provinces that make up the autonomous community of the Junta de Andalucía during the 2021/22 academic year. Using the criterion of accessibility, several vocational training teachers were contacted to facilitate the distribution of the instruments among their students and the rest of the teachers in the participating centers. In the third phase – implementation – the instruments were applied via the online platform (end of April 2021). The average time to complete the two questionnaires was 40 min. In the fourth phase -analysis- the data were downloaded from the platform, and different descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) and multivariate statistics (structural equation model and multigroup analysis) were applied and the results analyzed.

2.4 Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS 25.0 and Amos. To understand the relationships between each construct, structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to examine causal relationships between constructs. Bootstrapping was used to demonstrate mediating effects. Finally, when comparing the differences between whether students are in theory or in practice, a multigroup invariance analysis using z-scores was conducted to test the possible moderating effect of this factor. Differences in z-score values between the constrained and unconstrained model were calculated, and structural trajectories in each subgroup were compared on the basis of the z-scores ( Gaskin, 2012 ).

Table 2 outlines the means and standard deviations, the Cronbach’s alpha reliability indices, and the correlations between the scales. In terms of internal consistency, the alpha index values were above 0.80, indicating high reliability.

Table 2 . Means, standard deviations, reliabilities, and zero-order correlations among variables.

As can be seen in Table 2 , all scales correlate significantly with each other. Specifically, a negative and moderate correlation was observed between Challenge stressors and Smartphone Addiction ( r  = −0.33; p  < 0.01); a significant negative correlation between Challenge stressors and Maladaptive, although weak ( r  = −0.23; p  < 0.05); and a significant positive and strong correlation between Challenge stressors and Cyberloafing ( r  = − 0.55; p  < 0.001).

On the other hand, significant positive correlations were found between Challenge stressors and Hindrance stressors of strong size ( r  = 0.58; p  < 0.001). There was a weak positive significant correlation between Hindrance stressors and Smartphone Addiction ( r  = 0.28; p  < 0.01); a moderate positive significant correlation between Hindrance stressors and Maladaptive ( r  = 0.31; p  < 0.01); and a moderate positive significant correlation between Hindrance stressors and Cyberloafing ( r  = 0.49; p  < 0.001). A significant positive correlation was observed between Smartphone Addiction and moderate-sized Maladaptine ( r  = 0.41; p  < 0.001); a significant positive correlation between Smartphone Addiction and Cyberloafing ( r  = 0.37; p  < 0.001) was also moderate. Finally, a significant positive and moderate correlation is found between Maladaptive and Cyberloafing ( r  = 0.47; p  < 0.01). In general terms, we can observe that the means and standard deviations in the variables are obtained around mean values in all of them: Challenge stressors ( M  = 3.21; SD = 0.77); Hindrance stressors ( M  = 2.87; SD = 0.62); Smartphone Addiction ( M  = 28.04; SD = 9.25); Maladaptive ( M  = 2.36; SD = 0.945) y Cyberloafing ( M  = 3.28; SD = 0.73).

3.1 Structural model testing

The model was tested through structural equation modeling (SEM), using AMOS 26.0. The relationships between variables and the unstandardized path coefficients of the model are shown in Figure 2 . Challenge stressors were negatively related to mobile addiction ( β  = −0.35, SE = 0.16, t  = −2.15; p  = 0.032), as were Maladaptive ( β  = −0.19, SE = 0.09, t  = −2.01; p  = 0.045), supporting Hypotheses 3 and 8, respectively. However, obstacle stressors were positively related to mobile phone addiction ( β  = 0.55, SE = 0.24, t  = 2.30; p  = 0.022) and to Maladaptive ( β  = 0.23, SE = 0.07, t  = 3.18; p  = 0.002) supporting hypotheses 4 and 9.

Figure 2 . Unstandardized path coefficients for structural equation model.

Smartphone addiction was positively related to Maladaptive ( β  = 0.39, SE = 0.14, t  = 2.69; p  = 0.007), thus supporting hypothesis 10.

On the other hand, both Smartphone addiction ( β  = 0.53, SE = 0.15, t  = 3.54; p  < 0.001) and Maladaptive ( β  = 0.54, SE = 0.24, t  = 2.28; p  = 0.023) were significant predictors of cyberloafing, supporting hypotheses 7 and 13. The direct pathway from challenge stressors to cyberloafing ( β  = −0.43, SE = 0.16, t  = −6.90; p  < 0.001) was significantly negative, thus not supporting hypothesis 2, while the direct route from obstacle stressors to cyberloafing ( β  = 0.41, SE = 0.07, t  = 6.17; p  < 0.001) was significantly positive, thus supporting hypothesis 1.

The fact that the direct effects of challenge and hindrance stressors on mobile addiction and cyberloafing were significant supported the possibility of an indirect effect. Bias-corrected bootstrapping was used to test for an indirect effect ( Preacher and Hayes, 2008 ; Hayes et al., 2011 ). The results indicate that mobile phone addiction mediates the relationship between stressors and cyberloafing. The indirect effects of challenge and hindrance stressors on cyberloafing through mobile addiction were significant (for challenge stressors, indirect effect = −0.19, 95% CI [0.03, 0.32] supporting hypothesis 5; for hindrance stressors, indirect effect = 0.29, 95% CI [0.07, 0.43] supporting hypothesis 6). Similarly, the fact that the significant direct effects of challenge and hindrance stressors on Maladaptive and Maladaptive on cyberloafing also suggested the possibility of an indirect effect. Thus, the Maladaptive measured the relationship between stressors and cyberloafing. The indirect effects of challenge and hindrance stressors on cyberloafing via the Maladaptive were significant (for challenge stressors, indirect effect = −0.10, 95% CI [0.01, 0.21] supporting hypothesis 11; for hindrance stressors, indirect effect = 0.12, 95% CI [0.01, 0.23] supporting hypothesis 12).

3.2 Multigroup analysis

Multigroup analysis was performed to compare the differences in the coefficients of the trajectories according to whether the students are in theory or in practice, using the z-score comparison ( Table 3 ). The result reveals that the relationship between Maladaptive and cyberloafing is positive in students who are in the theoretical part while in students who are in the practical part this relationship is negative, this difference being statistically significant.

Table 3 . Multi-group analysis regression coefficients.

4 Discussion and conclusions

With this research we have been able to analyze the relationship between challenge stressors, obstacle stressors, smartphone addiction, maladaptation and Cyberloafing in higher vocational training students. The mediating role of smartphone addiction and maladaptation in the relationship between challenge-obstacle stressors and Cyberloafing was analyzed. Findings suggest that students’ challenge stressors do not increase Cyberloafing, allowing them to cope with academic demands and work challenges during the theory and internship period. In contrast, obstacle stressors generate stressful situations that impair the acquisition of academic goals and the development of academic skills. In our research we observed that in vocational students, challenge-obstacle stressors have a disparate influence on cyberloafing.

Evidence was obtained that challenge stressors are negatively related to Smartphone addiction, taking into consideration that there are several methodologies that involve the use of Smartphones as a didactic resource, and smartphone addiction is related to cyberloafing. Challenge stressors were negatively related to Smartphone addiction (3). Furthermore, challenge stressors obtain a positive indirect relationship with cyberloafing, mediated by Smartphone addiction (5). The findings allow us to suggest that challenge stressors have a similar behavior to that found in studies conducted with employees ( Agarwal and Avey, 2020 ; Zhou et al., 2021 ); thus, we could suppose that this type of stress would allow reinforcing the commitment and effort to meet academic and work challenges, reducing the levels of Cyberloafing ( Kunzelmann and Rigotti, 2021 ).

The results of our research showed that, unlike challenge stressors, obstacle stressors are positively related to cyberloafing (h4), indicating that this type of stress causes an increase in cyberloafing as a temporary avoidance response to certain academic demands. Obstacle stressors have an indirect positive relationship with cyberloafing, mediated by smartphone addiction (6). This could lead to reduced academic performance and low academic and social integration. It is well known that smartphones are changing the system of relationships, lifestyles and ways of learning ( Karaoglan Yilmaz et al., 2023 ). However, incorrect use can have a negative impact on the learning process ( Wagner et al., 2012 ). Thus, addictive behavior and avoidance of stressful obstacle situations lead to increased levels of Smartphone addiction and Cyberloafing. As a result of this finding, it is necessary to regulate didactic planning so that the use of smartphones does not promote addiction. It must be considered that the dependence on smartphones has increased in the school environment. The smartphone has become a working tool for both teacher and pupil, and its use has become a commonly accepted habit for the teacher’s decision making in monitoring academic tasks. All this leads us to believe that the learner will become increasingly dependent on smartphones for school work. It is clear that educational programs on the responsible use of mobile phones need to continue to be implemented for students in stages prior to higher vocational education.

Our findings indicate that challenging stressors are negatively related to Maladaptive, as they tend to favor positive behaviors and effort. This relationship indicates a reduction in the values of self-blame, rumination, catastrophizing and blaming others. The same is not true for hindering stressors, increasing the use of Maladaptive emotional regulation strategies. Maladaptation leads to a further strengthening of smartphone addiction. As a result of our research, we observed that Maladaptive is higher when high values of Cyberloafing are registered; therefore, the use of Maladaptive emotional regulation strategies corresponds to avoidance behaviors that could favor Cyberloafing. Another important finding in this study, through multigrade analysis, is that we obtained a significant negative relationship between Maladaptive and Cyberloafing in internship students: higher levels of Maladaptive lower levels of Cyberloafing. During the internship period, students perceive the challenges differently than in theory class.

Thus, the perception that internship students have of the academic and work challenges or demands favor positive behavior and effort. We should bear in mind, firstly, that motivation at this final point of training may be of great importance, as the student will present a solid state of mind, which would allow a higher level of adaptation to achieve the academic objectives in a more effective and efficient way. Secondly, related to the previous statement, we can indicate that the vocational training student has chosen this training pathway oriented toward a more immediate employment opportunity, which maximizes the relationship between academic effort and the result of professional insertion. This choice is the majority of all students enrolled in higher vocational training. Despite what has been indicated in relation to trainees, some studies carried out with these students during the pandemic have shown the existence of maladjustment in an irregular way, with new forms of maladjustment appearing that had not previously been clearly established, such as the practice of being on the phone and ignoring those around them (phubbing).

Finally, we can indicate that our research also allows for a number of practical reflections on challenging stressors, which could mobilize the development of academic and professional competences. It should be noted that, while this type of stress provokes positive behaviors, it would also encourage innovative behavior in challenging situations ( Ren and Zhang, 2015 ). These innovative behaviors can relate to the learner, the teacher, the educational program and the organization of the school institution. As for the student, learning to manage stressful situations – i.e. developing soft skills related to stress management – can be a key element for academic success and be projected as an added value for their insertion into the world of work. Related to this learning, the development in the classroom of activities that put students in the situation of having to face challenging stressors and regulate them, will allow the teacher to promote competences related to stress management. This should take the form of the design and application of activities whose learning outcomes include the aforementioned soft competences. Finally, the very organization of spaces and times in the educational institution can also be oriented toward the development of stress management skills, with spaces for relaxation or the development of actions that include activities such as Dog Assisted Therapy in pet-friendly institutions, to reduce stress at specific times, such as exam periods.

4.1 Limitations and options for future research

The study has several limitations. Firstly, the sample consists of higher vocational students from a limited number of vocational families. It will be necessary in the future to expand the number of vocational families in order to carry out comparative analyses. In addition, research at other levels of vocational education, such as intermediate vocational training, may give a more complete picture of the role of stressors in academic success. An additional limitation may derive from the timing of the study – during the pandemic – when personal and academic relationships were disrupted by the excessive use of smartphones, due to confinement and virtual learning. At the present time, the relationship system may have changed with the return to normality, with personal relationships recovering in the face of mobile device use. However, this needs to be investigated, to find out whether the pandemic has been a break in the normal development of educational programs or, on the contrary, has substantially changed the system of relationships, teaching methodologies and modes of learning, as well as its influence on levels of academic stress and its management.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this article are not readily available because the full dataset is not available for this study. Contact the first (EL) or last author (JG) for access to specific variables. Requests to access the datasets should be directed to [email protected] .

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by the Ethics Committee in Human Research of the University of Granada were followed 2758CEIH2022. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation was not required from the participants or the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin in accordance with the national legislation and institutional requirements.

Author contributions

EL: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft. MKG: Conceptualization, Investigation, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. MCG: Conceptualization, Data curation, Project administration, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. JG: Conceptualization, Investigation, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing.

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This article is part of the research project Design of an instrument for the detection of the risk of early dropout in students of Higher Vocational Training, PPJIA2020.14, funded by the University of Granada.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Afshari, L., Hayat, A., Ramachandran, K. K., Bartram, T., and Balakrishnan, B. K. P. D. (2022). Threat or opportunity: accelerated job demands during COVID-19 pandemic. Pers. Rev. 51, 2482–2501. doi: 10.1108/pr-02-2021-0098

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Agarwal, U. A., and Avey, J. B. (2020). Abusive supervisors and employees who cyberloaf: examining the roles of psychological capital and contract breach. Internet Res. 30, 789–809. doi: 10.1108/INTR-05-2019-0208

Akbulut, Y., Dönmez, O., and Dursun, Ö. Ö. (2017). Cyberloafing and social desirability bias among students and employees. Comput. Hum. Behav. 72, 87–95. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.043

Akgün, F. (2020). Investigation of high school students’ cyberloafing behaviors in classes. Educ. Sci. 45, 79–108. doi: 10.15390/EB.2019.8419

Amanvermez, Y., Zhao, R., Cuijpers, P., de Wit, L. M., Ebert, D. D., Kessler, R. C., et al. (2022). Effects of self-guided stress management interventions in college students: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Internet Interv. 28:100503. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2022.100503

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ang, W. H. D., Lau, S. T., Cheng, L. J., Chew, H. S. J., Tan, J. H., Shorey, S., et al. (2022). Effectiveness of resilience interventions for higher education students: a meta-analysis and metaregression. J. Educ. Psychol. 114, 1670–1694. doi: 10.1037/edu0000719

Askew, K. L., Ilie, A., Bauer, J. A., Simonet, D. V., Buckner, J. E., and Robertson, T. A. (2019). Disentangling how coworkers and supervisors influence employee cyberloafing: what normative information are employees attending to? J. Leadersh. Org. Stud. 26, 526–544. doi: 10.1177/1548051818813091

Batabyal, S. K., and Bhal, K. T. (2020). Traditional cyberloafing, mobile cyberloafing and personal mobile-internet loafing in business organizations: exploring cognitive ethical logics. J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc. 18, 631–647. doi: 10.1108/JICES-07-2019-0081

Baturay, M. H., and Toker, S. (2015). An investigation of theimpact of demographics on cyberloafing from an educationalsettingangle. Comput. Hum. Behav. 50, 358–366. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.081

Berweger, S., Krattenmacher, S., Salzmann, P., and Schönenberger, S. (2013). LiSA. Lernende im Spannungsfeld von Ausbildungserwartungen, Ausbildungsrealität und erfolgreicher Erstausbildung . St. Gallen: Pädagogische Hochschule.

Google Scholar

Billett, S. (2014). The standing of vocational education: sources of its societal esteem and implications for its enactment. J. Vocat. Educ. Train. 66, 1–21. doi: 10.1080/13636820.2013.867525

Böhn, S., and Deutscher, V. (2022). Dropout from initial vocational training – a meta-synthesis of reasons from the apprentice’s point of view. Educ. Res. Rev. 35:100414. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100414

Bouw, E., Zitter, I., and De Bruijn, E. (2021). Multilevel design considerations for vocational curricula at the boundary of school and work. J. Curric. Stud. 53, 765–783. doi: 10.1080/00220272.2021.1899290

Bürgi, R., and Gonon, P. (2021). Varieties within a collective skill formation system: how VET governance in Switzerland is shaped by associations. Int. J. Res. Vocat. Educ. Train. 8, 46–64. doi: 10.13152/IJRVET.8.1.3

Cavanaugh, M. A., Boswell, W. R., Roehling, M. V., and Boudreau, J. W. (2000). An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among US managers. J. Appl. Psychol. 85, 65–74. doi: 10.1037//0021-9010.85.1.65

Cutuli, D. (2014). Cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression strategies role in the emotion regulation: an overview on their modulatory effects and neural correlates. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 8, 105–106. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00175

Ersoy, H., Duman, E., and Öncü, S. (2016). Motivation and success with augmented reality: an experimental study. J. Instruct. Technol. Teacher Educ. 5, 39–44.

Farivar, F., and Richardson, J. (2018). Cross-domain online social networking and job/life satisfaction. Academy of Management Global Proceedings, 160. Available at: https://journals.aom.org/doi/abs/10.5465/amgblproc.surrey.2018.0160.abs

Ferm, L. (2021). Vocational students’ ways of handling the academic/vocational divide. Int. J. Res. Vocat. Educ. Train. 8, 1–20. doi: 10.13152/IJRVET.8.1.1

Flanigan, A. E., and Babchuk, W. A. (2022). Digital distraction in the classroom: exploring instructor perceptions and reactions. Teach. High. Educ. 27, 352–370. doi: 10.1080/13562517.2020.1724937

Garnefski, N., Kraaij, V., and Spinhoven, P. (2001). Negative life events, cognitive emotion regulation and emotional problems. Personal. Individ. Differ. 30, 1311–1327. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00113-6

Garnefski, N., Kraaij, V., and Spinhoven, P. (2002). Manual for the use of the cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire . Leiderdorp: DATEC.

Gaskin, J. (2012). Group Comparison, Stats Tools Package. Available at: http://statwiki.kolobkreations.com

Gijón, P. (2020). Aprendizaje y educación de adultos: evolución, tendencias y organización Técnica Avicam.

Gökçearslan, Ş., Mumcu, F. K., Haşlaman, T., and Çevik, Y. D. (2016). Modeling smartphone addiction: the role of smartphone usage, self-regulation, general self-efficacy and cyberloafing in university students. Comput. Hum. Behav. 63, 639–649. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.091

Gökçearslan, Ş., Uluyol, Ç., and Şahin, S. (2018). Smartphone addiction, cyberloafing, stress and social support among university students: a path analysis. Child Youth Serv. Rev. 91, 47–54. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.05.036

Hayes, A. F., Preacher, K. J., and Myers, T. A. (2011). “Mediation and the estimation of indirect effects in political communication research” in The sourcebook for political communication research: Methods, measures, and analytical techniques . eds. E. P. Bucy and R. L. Holbert (New York, NY: Routledge), 434–465.

Hernández, C., Ferrer, C., Montagud, S., and Blanco, M. C. (2023). Estrés en tiempos de confinamiento: estrategias de afrontamientoy crecimiento postraumático en población universitaria. Revista de Psicología y Educación 18, 1–10. doi: 10.23923/rpye2023.01.229

Hösli, S., Wade, L., and Von Wyl, A. (2018). “Stress und soziale Unterstützung im ersten Jahr einer Berufsausbildung” in Jugendliche im Übergang zwischen Schule und Beruf . eds. F. Sabatella and A. von Wyl (Berlin: Springer), 23–39.

Johnson, C. C., Walton, J. B., Strickler, L., and Elliott, J. B. (2023). Online teaching in K-12 education in the United States: a systematic review. Rev. Educ. Res. 93, 353–411. doi: 10.3102/00346543221105550

Junco, R., and Cotten, S. R. (2012). No a 4 U: the relationship between multitasking and academic performance. Comput. Educ. 59, 505–514. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.023

Karaoglan Yilmaz, F. G., Avci, U., and Yilmaz, R. (2023). The role of loneliness and aggression on smartphone addiction among university students. Curr. Psychol. 42, 17909–17917. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03018-w

Karatepe, O. M., Yavas, U., Babakus, E., and Deitz, G. D. (2018). The effects of organizational and personal resources on stress, engagement, and job outcomes. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 74, 147–161. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.04.005

Kassam, K. S., Koslov, K., and Mendes, W. B. (2009). Decisions under distress. Psychol. Sci. 20, 1394–1399. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02455.x

Khansa, L., Kuem, J., Siponen, M., and Kim, S. S. (2017). To cyberloaf or not to cyberloaf: the impact of the announcement of formal organizational controls. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 34, 141–176. doi: 10.1080/07421222.2017.1297173

Kim, M., and Beehr, T. A. (2020). Thriving on demand: challenging work results in employee flourishing through appraisals and resources. Int. J. Stress. Manag. 27, 111–125. doi: 10.1037/str0000135

Koay, K. Y., Soh, P. C. H., and Chew, K. W. (2017). Do employees’ private demands lead to cyberloafing? The mediating role of job stress. Management Research Review 40, 1025–1038. doi: 10.1108/MRR-11-2016-0252

Koay, K. Y., and Soh, P. C. H. (2018). Should cyberloafing be allowed in the workplace? Hum. Resour. Manag. Int. Dig. 26, 4–6. doi: 10.1108/HRMID-05-2018-0107

Kötter, T., Wagner, J., Brüheim, L., and Voltmer, E. (2017). Perceived medical school stress of undergraduate medical students predicts academic performance: an observational study. BMC Med. Educ. 17, 1–6. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1091-0

Kraaij, V., Garnefski, N., de Wilde, E. J., Dijkstra, A., Gebhardt, W., Maes, S., et al. (2003). Negative life events and depressive symptoms in late adolescence: bonding and cognitive coping as vulnerability factors? J. Youth Adolesc. 32, 185–193. doi: 10.1023/A:1022543419747

Kunzelmann, A., and Rigotti, T. (2021). Challenge demands and resilience: strain and learning as different pathways. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie 66, 59–71. doi: 10.1026/0932-4089/a000363

Kwon, M., Kim, D.-J., Cho, H., and Yang, S. (2013). The smartphone addiction scale: development and validation of a short version for adolescents. PLoS One 8:83558. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083558

Lau, P., Kwong, T., Chong, K., and Wong, E. (2013). Developing students’ teamwork skills in a cooperative learning project. Int. J. Lesson Learn. Stud. 3, 80–99. doi: 10.1108/IJLLS-03-2013-0018

LePine, J. A., Podsakoff, N. P., and LePine, M. A. (2005). A meta-analytic test of the challenge stressor–hindrance stressor framework: an explanation for inconsistent relationships among stressors and performance. Acad. Manag. J. 48, 764–775. doi: 10.5465/AMJ.2005.18803921

Leu, S. (2014). Stress und soziale Unterstützung bei Jugendlichen im ersten Jahr einer Berufsausbildung (Trabajo Fin de Grado, Zurich University of Applied Sciences). Repository Institutional ZHAW. Appl. Psychol. doi: 10.21256/zhaw-770

Ley Orgánica. (2022). de 31 de marzo, de ordenación e integración de la Formación Profesional.

Lim, V. K. G. (2002). The IT way of loafing on the job: Cyberloafing, neutralizing and organizational justice. J. Organ. Behav. 23, 675–694. doi: 10.1002/job.161

Lim, V. K., and Teo, T. S. (2005). Prevalence, perceived seriousness, justification and regulation of cyberloafing in Singapore: An exploratory study. Information & Management 42, 1081–1093. doi: 10.1016/j.im.2004.12.002

Lizarte, E. J. (2021). “Quality in higher education: drop-out profiles of students from the University of Granada” in Educar y formar a la generación Z: experiencias derivadas de la investigación . eds. A. J. Moreno, J. A. Marín, J. M. Trujillo, and M. P. Cáceres (Barcelona: Octaedro), 103–122.

Lizarte, E. J., and Gijón, J. (2022a). “El abandono en la formación profesional superior: Un reto para investigadores y actores políticos” in Experiencias e investigaciones en contextos educativos . eds. J. M. Trujillo, D. Capperucci, C. Rodríguez, and N. Campos (Madrid: Dykinson), 364–373.

Lizarte, E. J., and Gijón, J. (2022b). Prediction of early dropout in higher education using the SCPQ. Cogent Psychol. 9:2123588. doi: 10.1080/23311908.2022.2123588

Lowe-Calverley, E., and Grieve, R. (2017). Web of deceit: relationships between the dark triad, perceived ability to deceive and cyberloafing. Cyberpsychology 11:5. doi: 10.5817/CP2017-2-5

Mazzola, J. J., and Disselhorst, R. (2019). Should we be “challenging” employees?: a critical review and meta-analysis of the challenge-hindrance model of stress. J. Organ. Behav. 40, 949–961. doi: 10.1002/job.2412

Metin, I., and Demirtepe, D. (2021). Cyberloafing behaviors among university students: their relationships with positive and negative affect. Curr. Psychol. 42, 11101–11114. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-02374-3

Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional (MEFP) (2021). Informe 2021 sobre el estado del sistema educativo. Curso 2019–2020 . Madrid: Secretaría General Técnica.

OECD. (2018). Getting skills right: Spain, getting skills right , OECD Publishing, Paris.

Park, J. H., and Park, J. H. (2017). The relationships among interpersonal relationship anxiety, college adjustment, self-control, and smartphone addiction in nursing students. Journal of the Korean Data and Information Science Society 28, 185–194. doi: 10.7465/jkdi.2017.28.1.185

Pearsall, M. J., Ellis, A. P. J., and Stein, J. H. (2009). Coping with challenge and hindrance stressors in teams: behavioral, cognitive, and affective outcomes. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 109, 18–28. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.02.002

Podsakoff, N. P., LePine, J. A., and LePine, M. A. (2007). Differential challenge stressor-hindrance stressor relationships with job attitudes, turnover intentions, turnover, and withdrawal behavior: a meta analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 92, 438–454. doi: 10.1037/00219010.92.2.438

Preacher, K. J., and Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behav. Res. Methods 40, 879–891. doi: 10.3758/brm.40.3.879

Pusceddu, T. (2016). Stresserleben und Stressbewältigung von kaufmännischen Lernenden (Trabajo Fin de Grado, Fachhochschule Nordwestschweiz). Repository Institutional FHNW. Available at: https://doi.org/10.26041/fhnw-811

Reizer, A., Galperin, B. L., Chavan, M., Behl, A., and Pereira, V. (2022). Examining the relationship between fear of COVID-19, intolerance for uncertainty, and cyberloafing: a mediational model. J. Bus. Res. 145, 660–670. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.037

Ren, F., and Zhang, J. (2015). Job stressors, organizational innovation climate, and employees’ innovative behavior. Creat. Res. J. 27, 16–23. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2015.992659

Saritepeci, M. (2020). Predictors of cyberloafing among high school students: unauthorized access to school network, metacognitive awareness and smartphone addiction. Educ. Inf. Technol. 25, 2201–2219. doi: 10.1007/s10639-019-10042-0

Sawhney, G., and Michel, J. S. (2022). Challenge and hindrance stressors and work outcomes: the moderating role of day-level affect. J. Bus. Psychol. 37, 389–405. doi: 10.1007/s10869-021-09752-5

Schaap, H., Baartman, L. K. J., and De Bruijn, E. (2012). Students’ learning processes during school-based learning and workplace learning in vocational education: a review. Vocat. Learn. 5, 99–117. doi: 10.1007/s12186-011-9069-2

Schulten, D., and Wussler, K. (2013). Auszubildende im Stress? Was Unternehmen tun können. Wirtschaftspsychologie aktuell 2, 40–44.

Steinmann, R. M. (2005). “Psychische Gesundheit − Stress” in Wissenschaftliche Grundlagen für eine nationale Strategie zur Stressprävention und Förderung psychischer Gesundheit in der Schweiz (Bern: Gesundheitsförderung Schweiz)

Tandon, A., Kaur, P., Ruparel, N., Islam, J. U., and Dhir, A. (2021). Cyberloafing and cyberslacking in the workplace: systematic literature review of past achievements and future promises. Internet Res. 32, 55–89. doi: 10.1108/INTR-06-2020-0332

Toepper, M., Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., and Kühling-Thees, C. (2022). Literature review of international empirical research on transfer of vocational education and training. Int. J. Train. Dev. 26, 686–708. doi: 10.1111/ijtd.12276

Umer, M., Ul, I., Murtaza, G., and Jaffery, H. (2022). Challenge–hindrance stressors, helping behavior and job performance: double-edged sword of religiousness. J. Bus. Ethics 179, 1–13. doi: 10.1007/s10551-022-05129-7

Virgós, M., Burguera, J., and Pérez, M. H. (2022). La Formación Profesional Dual en la empresa desde la perspectiva de sus protagonistas. Revista Complutense de Educación 33, 27–39. doi: 10.5209/rced.70992

Vorontsova, O., Ghisletta, P., Ababkov, V., Bondolfi, G., and Barisnikov, K. (2022). Short mindfulness-based intervention for psychological and academic outcomes among university students. Anxiety Stress Coping 35, 141–157. doi: 10.1080/10615806.2021.1931143

Wagner, D. T., Barnes, C. M., Lim, V. K., and Ferris, D. L. (2012). Lost sleep and cyberloafing: evidence from the laboratory and a daylight saving time quasi-experiment. J. Appl. Psychol. 97, 1068–1076. doi: 10.1037/a0027557

Wallace, J. C., Edwards, B. D., Arnold, T., Frazier, M. L., and Finch, D. M. (2009). Work stressors, role-based performance, and the moderating influence of organizational support. J. Appl. Psychol. 94, 254–262. doi: 10.1037/a0013090

Wu, J. Y., and Xie, C. (2018). Using time pressure and note-taking to prevent digital distraction behavior and enhance online search performance: Perspectives from the load theory of attention and cognitive control. Computers in Human Behavior 88, 244–254. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.07.008

Yildiz, H., and Saritepeci, M. (2019). Occupational burnout and cyberloafing among teachers: analysis of personality traits, individual and occupational status variables as predictors. Soc. Sci. J. 56, 69–87. doi: 10.1016/j.soscij.2018.10.011

Zhou, B., Li, Y., Hai, M., Wang, W., and Niu, B. (2021). Challenge-hindrance stressors and cyberloafing: a perspective of resource conservation versus resource acquisition. Curr. Psychol. 42, 1172–1181. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-01505-0

Keywords: cyberloafing, challenge, hindrance, stress, smartphone addiction

Citation: Lizarte Simón EJ, Khaled Gijón M, Galván Malagón MC and Gijón Puerta J (2024) Challenge-obstacle stressors and cyberloafing among higher vocational education students: the moderating role of smartphone addiction and Maladaptive. Front. Psychol . 15:1358634. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1358634

Received: 20 December 2023; Accepted: 19 March 2024; Published: 18 April 2024.

Reviewed by:

Copyright © 2024 Lizarte Simón, Khaled Gijón, Galván Malagón and Gijón Puerta. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) . The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: José Gijón Puerta, [email protected]

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.