- - Google Chrome
Intended for healthcare professionals
- Access provided by Google Indexer
- My email alerts
- BMA member login
- Username * Password * Forgot your log in details? Need to activate BMA Member Log In Log in via OpenAthens Log in via your institution
Search form
- Advanced search
- Search responses
- Search blogs
- How to present patient...
How to present patient cases
- Related content
- Peer review
- Mary Ni Lochlainn , foundation year 2 doctor 1 ,
- Ibrahim Balogun , healthcare of older people/stroke medicine consultant 1
- 1 East Kent Foundation Trust, UK
A guide on how to structure a case presentation
This article contains...
-History of presenting problem
-Medical and surgical history
-Drugs, including allergies to drugs
-Family history
-Social history
-Review of systems
-Findings on examination, including vital signs and observations
-Differential diagnosis/impression
-Investigations
-Management
Presenting patient cases is a key part of everyday clinical practice. A well delivered presentation has the potential to facilitate patient care and improve efficiency on ward rounds, as well as a means of teaching and assessing clinical competence. 1
The purpose of a case presentation is to communicate your diagnostic reasoning to the listener, so that he or she has a clear picture of the patient’s condition and further management can be planned accordingly. 2 To give a high quality presentation you need to take a thorough history. Consultants make decisions about patient care based on information presented to them by junior members of the team, so the importance of accurately presenting your patient cannot be overemphasised.
As a medical student, you are likely to be asked to present in numerous settings. A formal case presentation may take place at a teaching session or even at a conference or scientific meeting. These presentations are usually thorough and have an accompanying PowerPoint presentation or poster. More often, case presentations take place on the wards or over the phone and tend to be brief, using only memory or short, handwritten notes as an aid.
Everyone has their own presenting style, and the context of the presentation will determine how much detail you need to put in. You should anticipate what information your senior colleagues will need to know about the patient’s history and the care he or she has received since admission, to enable them to make further management decisions. In this article, I use a fictitious case to show how you can structure case presentations, which can be adapted to different clinical and teaching settings (box 1).
Box 1: Structure for presenting patient cases
Presenting problem, history of presenting problem, medical and surgical history.
Drugs, including allergies to drugs
Family history
Social history, review of systems.
Findings on examination, including vital signs and observations
Differential diagnosis/impression
Investigations
Case: tom murphy.
You should start with a sentence that includes the patient’s name, sex (Mr/Ms), age, and presenting symptoms. In your presentation, you may want to include the patient’s main diagnosis if known—for example, “admitted with shortness of breath on a background of COPD [chronic obstructive pulmonary disease].” You should include any additional information that might give the presentation of symptoms further context, such as the patient’s profession, ethnic origin, recent travel, or chronic conditions.
“ Mr Tom Murphy is a 56 year old ex-smoker admitted with sudden onset central crushing chest pain that radiated down his left arm.”
In this section you should expand on the presenting problem. Use the SOCRATES mnemonic to help describe the pain (see box 2). If the patient has multiple problems, describe each in turn, covering one system at a time.
Box 2: SOCRATES—mnemonic for pain
Associations
Time course
Exacerbating/relieving factors
“ The pain started suddenly at 1 pm, when Mr Murphy was at his desk. The pain was dull in nature, and radiated down his left arm. He experienced shortness of breath and felt sweaty and clammy. His colleague phoned an ambulance. He rated the pain 9/10 in severity. In the ambulance he was given GTN [glyceryl trinitrate] spray under the tongue, which relieved the pain to 5/10. The pain lasted 30 minutes in total. No exacerbating factors were noted. Of note: Mr Murphy is an ex-smoker with a 20 pack year history”
Some patients have multiple comorbidities, and the most life threatening conditions should be mentioned first. They can also be categorised by organ system—for example, “has a long history of cardiovascular disease, having had a stroke, two TIAs [transient ischaemic attacks], and previous ACS [acute coronary syndrome].” For some conditions it can be worth stating whether a general practitioner or a specialist manages it, as this gives an indication of its severity.
In a surgical case, colleagues will be interested in exercise tolerance and any comorbidity that could affect the patient’s fitness for surgery and anaesthesia. If the patient has had any previous surgical procedures, mention whether there were any complications or reactions to anaesthesia.
“Mr Murphy has a history of type 2 diabetes, well controlled on metformin. He also has hypertension, managed with ramipril, and gout. Of note: he has no history of ischaemic heart disease (relevant negative) (see box 3).”
Box 3: Relevant negatives
Mention any relevant negatives that will help narrow down the differential diagnosis or could be important in the management of the patient, 3 such as any risk factors you know for the condition and any associations that you are aware of. For example, if the differential diagnosis includes a condition that you know can be hereditary, a relevant negative could be the lack of a family history. If the differential diagnosis includes cardiovascular disease, mention the cardiovascular risk factors such as body mass index, smoking, and high cholesterol.
Highlight any recent changes to the patient’s drugs because these could be a factor in the presenting problem. Mention any allergies to drugs or the patient’s non-compliance to a previously prescribed drug regimen.
To link the medical history and the drugs you might comment on them together, either here or in the medical history. “Mrs Walsh’s drugs include regular azathioprine for her rheumatoid arthritis.”Or, “His regular drugs are ramipril 5 mg once a day, metformin 1g three times a day, and allopurinol 200 mg once a day. He has no known drug allergies.”
If the family history is unrelated to the presenting problem, it is sufficient to say “no relevant family history noted.” For hereditary conditions more detail is needed.
“ Mr Murphy’s father experienced a fatal myocardial infarction aged 50.”
Social history should include the patient’s occupation; their smoking, alcohol, and illicit drug status; who they live with; their relationship status; and their sexual history, baseline mobility, and travel history. In an older patient, more detail is usually required, including whether or not they have carers, how often the carers help, and if they need to use walking aids.
“He works as an accountant and is an ex-smoker since five years ago with a 20 pack year history. He drinks about 14 units of alcohol a week. He denies any illicit drug use. He lives with his wife in a two storey house and is independent in all activities of daily living.”
Do not dwell on this section. If something comes up that is relevant to the presenting problem, it should be mentioned in the history of the presenting problem rather than here.
“Systems review showed long standing occasional lower back pain, responsive to paracetamol.”
Findings on examination
Initially, it can be useful to practise presenting the full examination to make sure you don’t leave anything out, but it is rare that you would need to present all the normal findings. Instead, focus on the most important main findings and any abnormalities.
“On examination the patient was comfortable at rest, heart sounds one and two were heard with no additional murmurs, heaves, or thrills. Jugular venous pressure was not raised. No peripheral oedema was noted and calves were soft and non-tender. Chest was clear on auscultation. Abdomen was soft and non-tender and normal bowel sounds were heard. GCS [Glasgow coma scale] was 15, pupils were equal and reactive to light [PEARL], cranial nerves 1-12 were intact, and he was moving all four limbs. Observations showed an early warning score of 1 for a tachycardia of 105 beats/ min. Blood pressure was 150/90 mm Hg, respiratory rate 18 breaths/min, saturations were 98% on room air, and he was apyrexial with a temperature of 36.8 ºC.”
Differential diagnoses
Mentioning one or two of the most likely diagnoses is sufficient. A useful phrase you can use is, “I would like to rule out,” especially when you suspect a more serious cause is in the differential diagnosis. “History and examination were in keeping with diverticular disease; however, I would like to rule out colorectal cancer in this patient.”
Remember common things are common, so try not to mention rare conditions first. Sometimes it is acceptable to report investigations you would do first, and then base your differential diagnosis on what the history and investigation findings tell you.
“My impression is acute coronary syndrome. The differential diagnosis includes other cardiovascular causes such as acute pericarditis, myocarditis, aortic stenosis, aortic dissection, and pulmonary embolism. Possible respiratory causes include pneumonia or pneumothorax. Gastrointestinal causes include oesophageal spasm, oesophagitis, gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, gastritis, cholecystitis, and acute pancreatitis. I would also consider a musculoskeletal cause for the pain.”
This section can include a summary of the investigations already performed and further investigations that you would like to request. “On the basis of these differentials, I would like to carry out the following investigations: 12 lead electrocardiography and blood tests, including full blood count, urea and electrolytes, clotting screen, troponin levels, lipid profile, and glycated haemoglobin levels. I would also book a chest radiograph and check the patient’s point of care blood glucose level.”
You should consider recommending investigations in a structured way, prioritising them by how long they take to perform and how easy it is to get them done and how long it takes for the results to come back. Put the quickest and easiest first: so bedside tests, electrocardiography, followed by blood tests, plain radiology, then special tests. You should always be able to explain why you would like to request a test. Mention the patient’s baseline test values if they are available, especially if the patient has a chronic condition—for example, give the patient’s creatinine levels if he or she has chronic kidney disease This shows the change over time and indicates the severity of the patient’s current condition.
“To further investigate these differentials, 12 lead electrocardiography was carried out, which showed ST segment depression in the anterior leads. Results of laboratory tests showed an initial troponin level of 85 µg/L, which increased to 1250 µg/L when repeated at six hours. Blood test results showed raised total cholesterol at 7.6 mmol /L and nil else. A chest radiograph showed clear lung fields. Blood glucose level was 6.3 mmol/L; a glycated haemoglobin test result is pending.”
Dependent on the case, you may need to describe the management plan so far or what further management you would recommend.“My management plan for this patient includes ACS [acute coronary syndrome] protocol, echocardiography, cardiology review, and treatment with high dose statins. If you are unsure what the management should be, you should say that you would discuss further with senior colleagues and the patient. At this point, check to see if there is a treatment escalation plan or a “do not attempt to resuscitate” order in place.
“Mr Murphy was given ACS protocol in the emergency department. An echocardiogram has been requested and he has been discussed with cardiology, who are going to come and see him. He has also been started on atorvastatin 80 mg nightly. Mr Murphy and his family are happy with this plan.”
The summary can be a concise recap of what you have presented beforehand or it can sometimes form a standalone presentation. Pick out salient points, such as positive findings—but also draw conclusions from what you highlight. Finish with a brief synopsis of the current situation (“currently pain free”) and next step (“awaiting cardiology review”). Do not trail off at the end, and state the diagnosis if you are confident you know what it is. If you are not sure what the diagnosis is then communicate this uncertainty and do not pretend to be more confident than you are. When possible, you should include the patient’s thoughts about the diagnosis, how they are feeling generally, and if they are happy with the management plan.
“In summary, Mr Murphy is a 56 year old man admitted with central crushing chest pain, radiating down his left arm, of 30 minutes’ duration. His cardiac risk factors include 20 pack year smoking history, positive family history, type 2 diabetes, and hypertension. Examination was normal other than tachycardia. However, 12 lead electrocardiography showed ST segment depression in the anterior leads and troponin rise from 85 to 250 µg/L. Acute coronary syndrome protocol was initiated and a diagnosis of NSTEMI [non-ST elevation myocardial infarction] was made. Mr Murphy is currently pain free and awaiting cardiology review.”
Originally published as: Student BMJ 2017;25:i4406
Competing interests: None declared.
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed
- ↵ Green EH, Durning SJ, DeCherrie L, Fagan MJ, Sharpe B, Hershman W. Expectations for oral case presentations for clinical clerks: opinions of internal medicine clerkship directors. J Gen Intern Med 2009 ; 24 : 370 - 3 . doi:10.1007/s11606-008-0900-x pmid:19139965 . OpenUrl CrossRef PubMed Web of Science
- ↵ Olaitan A, Okunade O, Corne J. How to present clinical cases. Student BMJ 2010;18:c1539.
- ↵ Gaillard F. The secret art of relevant negatives, Radiopedia 2016; http://radiopaedia.org/blog/the-secret-art-of-relevant-negatives .
The Ultimate Patient Case Presentation Template for Med Students
- April 6, 2024
- Reviewed by: Amy Rontal, MD
Knowing how to deliver a patient presentation is one of the most important skills to learn on your journey to becoming a physician. After all, when you’re on a medical team, you’ll need to convey all the critical information about a patient in an organized manner without any gaps in knowledge transfer.
One big caveat: opinions about the correct way to present a patient are highly personal and everyone is slightly different. Additionally, there’s a lot of variation in presentations across specialties, and even for ICU vs floor patients.
My goal with this blog is to give you the most complete version of a patient presentation, so you can tailor your presentations to the preferences of your attending and team. So, think of what follows as a model for presenting any general patient.
Here’s a breakdown of what goes into the typical patient presentation.
Looking for some help studying your shelf/Step 2 studying with clinical rotations? Try our combined Step 2 & Shelf Exams Qbank with 5,500 practice questions— free for 7 days!
7 Ingredients for a Patient Case Presentation Template
1. the one-liner.
The one-liner is a succinct sentence that primes your listeners to the patient.
A typical format is: “[Patient name] is a [age] year-old [gender] with past medical history of [X] presenting with [Y].
2. The Chief Complaint
This is a very brief statement of the patient’s complaint in their own words. A common pitfall is when medical students say that the patient had a chief complaint of some medical condition (like cholecystitis) and the attending asks if the patient really used that word!
An example might be, “Patient has chief complaint of difficulty breathing while walking.”
3. History of Present Illness (HPI)
The goal of the HPI is to illustrate the story of the patient’s complaint. I remember when I first began medical school, I had a lot of trouble determining what was relevant and ended up giving a lot of extra details. Don’t worry if you have the same issue. With time, you’ll learn which details are important.
The OPQRST Framework
In the beginning of your clinical experience, a helpful framework to use is OPQRST:
Describe when the issue started, and if it occurs during certain environmental or personal exposures.
P rovocative
Report if there are any factors that make the pain better or worse. These can be broad, like noting their shortness of breath worsened when lying flat, or their symptoms resolved during rest.
Relay how the patient describes their pain or associated symptoms. For example, does the patient have a burning versus a pressure sensation? Are they feeling weakness, stiffness, or pain?
R egion/Location
Indicate where the pain is located and if it radiates anywhere.
Talk about how bad the pain is for the patient. Typically, a 0-10 pain scale is useful to provide some objective measure.
Discuss how long the pain lasts and how often it occurs.
A Case Study
While the OPQRST framework is great when starting out, it can be limiting. Let’s take an example where the patient is not experiencing pain and comes in with altered mental status along with diffuse jaundice of the skin and a history of chronic liver disease. You will find that certain sections of OPQRST do not apply. In this event, the HPI is still a story, but with a different framework. Try to go in chronological order. Include relevant details like if there have been any changes in medications, diet, or bowel movements.
Pertinent Positive and Negative Symptoms
Regardless of the framework you use, the name of the game is pertinent positive and negative symptoms the patient is experiencing. I’d like to highlight the word “pertinent.” It’s less likely the patient’s chronic osteoarthritis and its management is related to their new onset shortness of breath, but it’s still important for knowing the patient’s complete medical picture. A better place to mention these details would be in the “Past Medical History” section, and reserve the HPI portion for more pertinent history. As you become exposed to more illness scripts, experience will teach you which parts of the history are most helpful to state. Also, as you spend more time on the wards, you will pick up on which questions are relevant and important to ask during the patient interview. By painting a clear picture with pertinent positives and negatives during your presentation, the history will guide what may be higher or lower on the differential diagnosis. Some other important components to add are the patient’s additional past medical/surgical history, family history, social history, medications, allergies, and immunizations.
The HEADSSS Method
Particularly, the social history is an important time to describe the patient as a complete person and understand how their life story may affect their present condition. One way of organizing the social history is the HEADSSS method: – H ome living situation and relationships – E ducation and employment – A ctivities and hobbies – D rug use (alcohol, tobacco, cocaine, etc.) Note frequency of use, and if applicable, be sure to add which types of alcohol consumption (like beer versus hard liquor) and forms of drug use. – S exual history (partners, STI history, pregnancy plans) – S uicidality and depression – S piritual and religious history Again, there’s a lot of variation in presenting social history, so just follow the lead of your team. For example, it’s not always necessary/relevant to obtain a sexual history, so use your judgment of the situation.
4. Review of Symptoms
Oftentimes, most elements of this section are embedded within the HPI. If there are any additional symptoms not mentioned in the HPI, it’s appropriate to state them here.
5. Objective
Vital signs.
Some attendings love to hear all five vital signs: temperature, blood pressure (mean arterial pressure if applicable), heart rate, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation. Others are happy with “afebrile and vital signs stable.” Just find out their preference and stick to that.
Physical Exam
This is one of the most important parts of the patient presentation for any specialty. It paints a picture of how the patient looks and can guide acute management like in the case of a rigid abdomen. As discussed in the HPI section, typically you should report pertinent positives and negatives. When you’re starting out, your attending and team may prefer for you to report all findings as part of your learning. For example, pulmonary exam findings can be reported as: “Regular chest appearance. No abnormalities on palpation. Lungs resonant to percussion. Clear to auscultation bilaterally without crackles, rhonchi, or wheezing.” Typically, you want to report the physical exams in a head to toe format: General Appearance, Mental Status, Neurologic, Eyes/Ears/Nose/Mouth/Neck, Cardiovascular, Pulmonary, Breast, Abdominal, Genitourinary, Musculoskeletal, and Skin. Depending on the situation, additional exams can be incorporated as applicable.
Now comes reporting pertinent positive and negative labs. Several labs are often drawn upon admission. It’s easy to fall into the trap of reading off all the labs and losing everyone’s attention. Here are some pieces of advice:
You normally can’t go wrong sticking to abnormal lab values.
One qualification is that for a patient with concern for acute coronary syndrome, reporting a normal troponin is essential. Also, stating the normalization of previously abnormal lab values like liver enzymes is important.
Demonstrate trends in lab values.
A lab value is just a single point in time and does not paint the full picture. For example, a hemoglobin of 10g/dL in a patient at 15g/dL the previous day is a lot more concerning than a patient who has been stable at 10g/dL for a week.
Try to avoid editorializing in this section.
Save your analysis of the labs for the assessment section. Again, this can be a point of personal preference. In my experience, the team typically wants the raw objective data in this section. This is also a good place to state the ins and outs of your patient (if applicable). In some patients, these metrics are strictly recorded and are typically reported as total fluid in and out over the past day followed by the net fluid balance. For example, “1L in, 2L out, net -1L over the past 24 hours.”
6. Diagnostics/Imaging
Next, you’ll want to review any important diagnostic tests and imaging. For example, describe how the EKG and echo look in a patient presenting with chest pain or the abdominal CT scan in a patient with right lower quadrant abdominal pain. Try to provide your own interpretation to develop your skills and then include the final impression. Also, report if a diagnostic test is still pending.
7. Assessment/Plan
This is the fun part where you get to use your critical thinking (aka doctor) skills! For the scope of this blog, we’ll review a problem-based plan. It’s helpful to begin with a summary statement that incorporates the one-liner, presenting issue(s)/diagnosis(es), and patient stability. Then, go through all the problems relevant to the admission. You can impress your audience by casting a wide differential diagnosis and going through the elements of your patient presentation that support one diagnosis over another. Following your assessment, try to suggest a management plan. In a patient with congestive heart failure exacerbation, initiating a diuresis regimen and measuring strict ins/outs are good starting points. You may even suggest a follow-up on their latest ejection fraction with an echo and check if they’re on guideline-directed medical therapy. Again, with more time on the clinical wards you’ll start to pick up on what management plan to suggest. One pointer is to talk about all relevant problems, not just the presenting issue. For example, a patient with diabetes may need to be put on a sliding scale insulin regimen or another patient may require physical/occupational therapy. Just try to stay organized and be comprehensive.
A Note About Patient Presentation Skills
When you’re doing your first patient presentations, it’s common to feel nervous. There may be a lot of “uhs” and “ums.”
Here’s the good news: you don’t have to be perfect! You just need to make a good faith attempt and keep on going with the presentation.
With time, your confidence will build. Practice your fluency in the mirror when you have a chance. No one was born knowing medicine and everyone has gone through the same stages of learning you are!
Practice your presentation a couple times before you present to the team if you have time. Pull a resident aside if they have the bandwidth to make sure you have all the information you need.
One big piece of advice: NEVER LIE. If you don’t know a specific detail, it’s okay to say, “I’m not sure, but I can look that up.” Someone on your team can usually retrieve the information while you continue on with your presentation.
Example Patient Case Presentation Template
Here’s a blank patient case presentation template that may come in handy. You can adapt it to best fit your needs. One-Liner: Chief Complaint: History of Present Illness: Past Medical History: Past Surgical History: Family History: Social History: Medications: Allergies: Immunizations: ROS: Objective: Vital Signs : Temp ___ BP ___ /___ HR ___ RR ___ O2 sat ___ Physical Exam:
General Appearance:
Mental Status:
Neurological:
Eyes, Ears, Nose, Mouth, and Neck:
Cardiovascular:
Genitourinary:
Musculoskeletal:
Most Recent Labs:
Previous Labs:
Diagnostics/Imaging:
Impression/Interpretation:
Assessment/Plan:
One-line summary:
#Problem 1:
Assessment:
#Problem 2:
Final Thoughts on Patient Presentations
I hope this post demystified the patient presentation for you. Be sure to stay organized in your delivery and be flexible with the specifications your team may provide. Something I’d like to highlight is that you may need to tailor the presentation to the specialty you’re on. For example, on OB/GYN, it’s important to include a pregnancy history. Nonetheless, the aforementioned template should set you up for success from a broad overview perspective. Stay tuned for my next post on how to give an ICU patient presentation. And if you’d like me to address any other topics in a blog, write to me at [email protected] ! Looking for more (free!) content to help you through clinical rotations? Check out these other posts from Blueprint tutors on the Med School blog:
- How I Balanced My Clinical Rotations with Shelf Exam Studying
- How (and Why) to Use a Qbank to Prepare for USMLE Step 2
- How to Study For Shelf Exams: A Tutor’s Guide
About the Author
Hailing from Phoenix, AZ, Neelesh is an enthusiastic, cheerful, and patient tutor. He is currently an Integrated Cardiothoracic Surgery Resident at The Ohio State University. He graduated from the Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California and served as president for the Class of 2024. He also graduated as valedictorian of his high school and the USC Viterbi School of Engineering, obtaining a B.S. in Biomedical Engineering in 2020. He discovered his penchant for teaching when he began tutoring his friends for the SAT and ACT in the summer of 2015 out of his living room. Outside of the academic sphere, Neelesh enjoys surfing and camping. Twitter: @NeeleshBagrodia LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin. com/in/ neelesh -bagrodia
Related Posts
How to Study For Shelf Exams: A Tutor’s Guide
- May 6, 2024
The Ultimate ICU Patient Presentation Template for Med Students
- May 3, 2024
Quiz: Which “Scrubs” Character Are You in Your Clinical Rotations?
- March 26, 2024
Overview and General Information about Oral Presentation
- Daily Presentations During Work Rounds
- The New Patient Presentation
- The Holdover Admission Presentation
- Outpatient Clinic Presentations
- The structure of presentations varies from service to service (e.g. medicine vs. surgery), amongst subspecialties, and between environments (inpatient vs. outpatient). Applying the correct style to the right setting requires that the presenter seek guidance from the listeners at the outset.
- Time available for presenting is rather short, which makes the experience more stressful.
- Individual supervisors (residents, faculty) often have their own (sometimes quirky) preferences regarding presentation styles, adding another layer of variability that the presenter has to manage.
- Students are evaluated/judged on the way in which they present, with faculty using this as one way of gauging a student’s clinical knowledge.
- Done well, presentations promote efficient, excellent care. Done poorly, they promote tedium, low morale, and inefficiency.
General Tips:
- Practice, Practice, Practice! Do this on your own, with colleagues, and/or with anyone who will listen (and offer helpful commentary) before you actually present in front of other clinicians. Speaking "on-the-fly" is difficult, as rapidly organizing and delivering information in a clear and concise fashion is not a naturally occurring skill.
- Immediately following your presentations, seek feedback from your listeners. Ask for specifics about what was done well and what could have been done better – always with an eye towards gaining information that you can apply to improve your performance the next time.
- Listen to presentations that are done well – ask yourself, “Why was it good?” Then try to incorporate those elements into your own presentations.
- Listen to presentations that go poorly – identify the specific things that made it ineffective and avoid those pitfalls when you present.
- Effective presentations require that you have thought through the case beforehand and understand the rationale for your conclusions and plan. This, in turn, requires that you have a good grasp of physiology, pathology, clinical reasoning and decision-making - pushing you to read, pay attention, and in general acquire more knowledge.
- Think about the clinical situation in which you are presenting so that you can provide a summary that is consistent with the expectations of your audience. Work rounds, for example, are clearly different from conferences and therefore mandate a different style of presentation.
- Presentations are the way in which we tell medical stories to one another. When you present, ask yourself if you’ve described the story in an accurate way. Will the listener be able to “see” the patient the same way that you do? Can they come to the correct conclusions? If not, re-calibrate.
- It's O.K. to use notes, though the oral presentation should not simply be reduced to reading the admission note – rather, it requires appropriate editing/shortening.
- In general, try to give your presentations on a particular service using the same order and style for each patient, every day. Following a specific format makes it easier for the listener to follow, as they know what’s coming and when they can expect to hear particular information. Additionally, following a standardized approach makes it easier for you to stay organized, develop a rhythm, and lessens the chance that you’ll omit elements.
Specific types of presentations
There are a number of common presentation-types, each with its own goals and formats. These include:
- Daily presentations during work rounds for patients known to a service.
- Newly admitted patients, where you were the clinician that performed the H&P.
- Newly admitted patients that were “handed off” to the team in the morning, such that the H&P was performed by others.
- Outpatient clinic presentations, covering several common situations.
Key elements of each presentation type are described below. Examples of how these would be applied to most situations are provided in italics. The formats are typical of presentations done for internal medicine services and clinics.
Note that there is an acceptable range of how oral presentations can be delivered. Ultimately, your goal is to tell the correct story, in a reasonable amount of time, so that the right care can be delivered. Nuances in the order of presentation, what to include, what to omit, etc. are relatively small points. Don’t let the pursuit of these elements distract you or create undue anxiety.
Daily presentations during work rounds of patients that you’re following:
- Organize the presenter (forces you to think things through)
- Inform the listener(s) of 24 hour events and plan moving forward
- Promote focused discussion amongst your listeners and supervisors
- Opportunity to reassess plan, adjust as indicated
- Demonstrate your knowledge and engagement in the care of the patient
- Rapid (5 min) presentation of the key facts
Key features of presentation:
- Opening one liner: Describe who the patient is, number of days in hospital, and their main clinical issue(s).
- 24-hour events: Highlighting changes in clinical status, procedures, consults, etc.
- Subjective sense from the patient about how they’re feeling, vital signs (ranges), and key physical exam findings (highlighting changes)
- Relevant labs (highlighting changes) and imaging
- Assessment and Plan : Presented by problem or organ systems(s), using as many or few as are relevant. Early on, it’s helpful to go through the main categories in your head as a way of making sure that you’re not missing any relevant areas. The broad organ system categories include (presented here head-to-toe): Neurological; Psychiatric; Cardiovascular; Pulmonary; Gastrointestinal; Renal/Genitourinary; Hematologic/Oncologic; Endocrine/Metabolic; Infectious; Tubes/lines/drains; Disposition.
Example of a daily presentation for a patient known to a team:
- Opening one liner: This is Mr. Smith, a 65 year old man, Hospital Day #3, being treated for right leg cellulitis
- MRI of the leg, negative for osteomyelitis
- Evaluation by Orthopedics, who I&D’d a superficial abscess in the calf, draining a moderate amount of pus
- Patient appears well, states leg is feeling better, less painful
- T Max 101 yesterday, T Current 98; Pulse range 60-80; BP 140s-160s/70-80s; O2 sat 98% Room Air
- Ins/Outs: 3L in (2 L NS, 1 L po)/Out 4L urine
- Right lower extremity redness now limited to calf, well within inked lines – improved compared with yesterday; bandage removed from the I&D site, and base had small amount of purulence; No evidence of fluctuance or undrained infection.
- Creatinine .8, down from 1.5 yesterday
- WBC 8.7, down from 14
- Blood cultures from admission still negative
- Gram stain of pus from yesterday’s I&D: + PMNS and GPCs; Culture pending
- MRI lower extremity as noted above – negative for osteomyelitis
- Continue Vancomycin for today
- Ortho to reassess I&D site, though looks good
- Follow-up on cultures: if MRSA, will transition to PO Doxycycline; if MSSA, will use PO Dicloxacillin
- Given AKI, will continue to hold ace-inhibitor; will likely wait until outpatient follow-up to restart
- Add back amlodipine 5mg/d today
- Hep lock IV as no need for more IVF
- Continue to hold ace-I as above
- Wound care teaching with RNs today – wife capable and willing to assist. She’ll be in this afternoon.
- Set up follow-up with PMD to reassess wound and cellulitis within 1 week
The Brand New Patient (admitted by you)
- Provide enough information so that the listeners can understand the presentation and generate an appropriate differential diagnosis.
- Present a thoughtful assessment
- Present diagnostic and therapeutic plans
- Provide opportunities for senior listeners to intervene and offer input
- Chief concern: Reason why patient presented to hospital (symptom/event and key past history in one sentence). It often includes a limited listing of their other medical conditions (e.g. diabetes, hypertension, etc.) if these elements might contribute to the reason for admission.
- The history is presented highlighting the relevant events in chronological order.
- 7 days ago, the patient began to notice vague shortness of breath.
- 5 days ago, the breathlessness worsened and they developed a cough productive of green sputum.
- 3 days ago his short of breath worsened to the point where he was winded after walking up a flight of stairs, accompanied by a vague right sided chest pain that was more pronounced with inspiration.
- Enough historical information has to be provided so that the listener can understand the reasons that lead to admission and be able to draw appropriate clinical conclusions.
- Past history that helps to shed light on the current presentation are included towards the end of the HPI and not presented later as “PMH.” This is because knowing this “past” history is actually critical to understanding the current complaint. For example, past cardiac catheterization findings and/or interventions should be presented during the HPI for a patient presenting with chest pain.
- Where relevant, the patient's baseline functional status is described, allowing the listener to understand the degree of impairment caused by the acute medical problem(s).
- It should be explicitly stated if a patient is a poor historian, confused or simply unaware of all the details related to their illness. Historical information obtained from family, friends, etc. should be described as such.
- Review of Systems (ROS): Pertinent positive and negative findings discovered during a review of systems are generally incorporated at the end of the HPI. The listener needs this information to help them put the story in appropriate perspective. Any positive responses to a more inclusive ROS that covers all of the other various organ systems are then noted. If the ROS is completely negative, it is generally acceptable to simply state, "ROS negative.”
- Other Past Medical and Surgical History (PMH/PSH): Past history that relates to the issues that lead to admission are typically mentioned in the HPI and do not have to be repeated here. That said, selective redundancy (i.e. if it’s really important) is OK. Other PMH/PSH are presented here if relevant to the current issues and/or likely to affect the patient’s hospitalization in some way. Unrelated PMH and PSH can be omitted (e.g. if the patient had their gall bladder removed 10y ago and this has no bearing on the admission, then it would be appropriate to leave it out). If the listener really wants to know peripheral details, they can read the admission note, ask the patient themselves, or inquire at the end of the presentation.
- Medications and Allergies: Typically all meds are described, as there’s high potential for adverse reactions or drug-drug interactions.
- Family History: Emphasis is placed on the identification of illnesses within the family (particularly among first degree relatives) that are known to be genetically based and therefore potentially heritable by the patient. This would include: coronary artery disease, diabetes, certain cancers and autoimmune disorders, etc. If the family history is non-contributory, it’s fine to say so.
- Social History, Habits, other → as relates to/informs the presentation or hospitalization. Includes education, work, exposures, hobbies, smoking, alcohol or other substance use/abuse.
- Sexual history if it relates to the active problems.
- Vital signs and relevant findings (or their absence) are provided. As your team develops trust in your ability to identify and report on key problems, it may become acceptable to say “Vital signs stable.”
- Note: Some listeners expect students (and other junior clinicians) to describe what they find in every organ system and will not allow the presenter to say “normal.” The only way to know what to include or omit is to ask beforehand.
- Key labs and imaging: Abnormal findings are highlighted as well as changes from baseline.
- Summary, assessment & plan(s) Presented by problem or organ systems(s), using as many or few as are relevant. Early on, it’s helpful to go through the main categories in your head as a way of making sure that you’re not missing any relevant areas. The broad organ system categories include (presented here head-to-toe): Neurological; Psychiatric; Cardiovascular; Pulmonary; Gastrointestinal; Renal/Genitourinary; Hematologic/Oncologic; Endocrine/Metabolic; Infectious; Tubes/lines/drains; Disposition.
- The assessment and plan typically concludes by mentioning appropriate prophylactic considerations (e.g. DVT prevention), code status and disposition.
- Chief Concern: Mr. H is a 50 year old male with AIDS, on HAART, with preserved CD4 count and undetectable viral load, who presents for the evaluation of fever, chills and a cough over the past 7 days.
- Until 1 week ago, he had been quite active, walking up to 2 miles a day without feeling short of breath.
- Approximately 1 week ago, he began to feel dyspneic with moderate activity.
- 3 days ago, he began to develop subjective fevers and chills along with a cough productive of red-green sputum.
- 1 day ago, he was breathless after walking up a single flight of stairs and spent most of the last 24 hours in bed.
- Diagnosed with HIV in 2000, done as a screening test when found to have gonococcal urethritis
- Was not treated with HAART at that time due to concomitant alcohol abuse and non-adherence.
- Diagnosed and treated for PJP pneumonia 2006
- Diagnosed and treated for CMV retinitis 2007
- Became sober in 2008, at which time interested in HAART. Started on Atripla, a combination pill containing: Efavirenz, Tonofovir, and Emtricitabine. He’s taken it ever since, with no adverse effects or issues with adherence. Receives care thru Dr. Smiley at the University HIV clinic.
- CD4 count 3 months ago was 400 and viral load was undetectable.
- He is a gay male, not currently sexually active. He has never used intravenous drugs.
- He has no history of asthma, COPD or chronic cardiac or pulmonary condition. No known liver disease. Hepatitis B and C negative. His current problem seems different to him then his past episode of PJP.
- Review of systems: negative for headache, photophobia, stiff neck, focal weakness, chest pain, abdominal pain, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, urinary symptoms, leg swelling, or other complaints.
- Hypertension x 5 years, no other known vascular disease
- Gonorrhea as above
- Alcohol abuse above and now sober – no known liver disease
- No relevant surgeries
- Atripla, 1 po qd
- Omeprazole 20 mg, 1 PO, qd
- Lisinopril 20mg, qd
- Naprosyn 250 mg, 1-2, PO, BID PRN
- No allergies
- Both of the patient's parents are alive and well (his mother is 78 and father 80). He has 2 brothers, one 45 and the other 55, who are also healthy. There is no family history of heart disease or cancer.
- Patient works as an accountant for a large firm in San Diego. He lives alone in an apartment in the city.
- Smokes 1 pack of cigarettes per day and has done so for 20 years.
- No current alcohol use. Denies any drug use.
- Sexual History as noted above; has sex exclusively with men, last partner 6 months ago.
- Seated on a gurney in the ER, breathing through a face-mask oxygen delivery system. Breathing was labored and accessory muscles were in use. Able to speak in brief sentences, limited by shortness of breath
- Vital signs: Temp 102 F, Pulse 90, BP 150/90, Respiratory Rate 26, O2 Sat (on 40% Face Mask) 95%
- HEENT: No thrush, No adenopathy
- Lungs: Crackles and Bronchial breath sounds noted at right base. E to A changes present. No wheezing or other abnormal sounds noted over any other area of the lung. Dullness to percussion was also appreciated at the right base.
- Cardiac: JVP less than 5 cm; Rhythm was regular. Normal S1 and S2. No murmurs or extra heart sounds noted.
- Abdomen and Genital exams: normal
- Extremities: No clubbing, cyanosis or edema; distal pulses 2+ and equal bilaterally.
- Skin: no eruptions noted.
- Neurological exam: normal
- WBC 18 thousand with 10% bands;
- Normal Chem 7 and LFTs.
- Room air blood gas: pH of 7.47/ PO2 of 55/PCO2 of 30.
- Sputum gram stain remarkable for an abundance of polys along with gram positive diplococci.
- CXR remarkable for dense right lower lobe infiltrate without effusion.
- Monitored care unit, with vigilance for clinical deterioration.
- Hypertension: given significant pneumonia and unclear clinical direction, will hold lisinopril. If BP > 180 and or if clear not developing sepsis, will consider restarting.
- Low molecular weight heparin
- Code Status: Wishes to be full code full care, including intubation and ICU stay if necessary. Has good quality of life and hopes to return to that functional level. Wishes to reconsider if situation ever becomes hopeless. Older brother Tom is surrogate decision maker if the patient can’t speak for himself. Tom lives in San Diego and we have his contact info. He is aware that patient is in the hospital and plans on visiting later today or tomorrow.
- Expected duration of hospitalization unclear – will know more based on response to treatment over next 24 hours.
The holdover admission (presenting data that was generated by other physicians)
- Handoff admissions are very common and present unique challenges
- Understand the reasons why the patient was admitted
- Review key history, exam, imaging and labs to assure that they support the working diagnostic and therapeutic plans
- Does the data support the working diagnosis?
- Do the planned tests and consults make sense?
- What else should be considered (both diagnostically and therapeutically)?
- This process requires that the accepting team thoughtfully review their colleagues efforts with a critical eye – which is not disrespectful but rather constitutes one of the main jobs of the accepting team and is a cornerstone of good care *Note: At some point during the day (likely not during rounds), the team will need to verify all of the data directly with the patient.
- 8-10 minutes
- Chief concern: Reason for admission (symptom and/or event)
- Temporally presented bullets of events leading up to the admission
- Review of systems
- Relevant PMH/PSH – historical information that might affect the patient during their hospitalization.
- Meds and Allergies
- Family and Social History – focusing on information that helps to inform the current presentation.
- Habits and exposures
- Physical exam, imaging and labs that were obtained in the Emergency Department
- Assessment and plan that were generated in the Emergency Department.
- Overnight events (i.e. what happened in the Emergency Dept. and after the patient went to their hospital room)? Responses to treatments, changes in symptoms?
- How does the patient feel this morning? Key exam findings this morning (if seen)? Morning labs (if available)?
- Assessment and Plan , with attention as to whether there needs to be any changes in the working differential or treatment plan. The broad organ system categories include (presented here head-to-toe): Neurological; Psychiatric; Cardiovascular; Pulmonary; Gastrointestinal; Renal/Genitourinary; Hematologic/Oncologic; Endocrine/Metabolic; Infectious; Tubes/lines/drains; Disposition.
- Chief concern: 70 yo male who presented with 10 days of progressive shoulder pain, followed by confusion. He was brought in by his daughter, who felt that her father was no longer able to safely take care for himself.
- 10 days ago, Mr. X developed left shoulder pain, first noted a few days after lifting heavy boxes. He denies falls or direct injury to the shoulder.
- 1 week ago, presented to outside hospital ER for evaluation of left shoulder pain. Records from there were notable for his being afebrile with stable vitals. Exam notable for focal pain anteriorly on palpation, but no obvious deformity. Right shoulder had normal range of motion. Left shoulder reported as diminished range of motion but not otherwise quantified. X-ray negative. Labs remarkable for wbc 8, creat 2.2 (stable). Impression was that the pain was of musculoskeletal origin. Patient was provided with Percocet and told to see PMD in f/u
- Brought to our ER last night by his daughter. Pain in shoulder worse. Also noted to be confused and unable to care for self. Lives alone in the country, home in disarray, no food.
- ROS: negative for falls, prior joint or musculoskeletal problems, fevers, chills, cough, sob, chest pain, head ache, abdominal pain, urinary or bowel symptoms, substance abuse
- Hypertension
- Coronary artery disease, s/p LAD stent for angina 3 y ago, no symptoms since. Normal EF by echo 2 y ago
- Chronic kidney disease stage 3 with creatinine 1.8; felt to be secondary to atherosclerosis and hypertension
- aspirin 81mg qd, atorvastatin 80mg po qd, amlodipine 10 po qd, Prozac 20
- Allergies: none
- Family and Social: lives alone in a rural area of the county, in contact with children every month or so. Retired several years ago from work as truck driver. Otherwise non-contributory.
- Habits: denies alcohol or other drug use.
- Temp 98 Pulse 110 BP 100/70
- Drowsy though arousable; oriented to year but not day or date; knows he’s at a hospital for evaluation of shoulder pain, but doesn’t know the name of the hospital or city
- CV: regular rate and rhythm; normal s1 and s2; no murmurs or extra heart sounds.
- Left shoulder with generalized swelling, warmth and darker coloration compared with Right; generalized pain on palpation, very limited passive or active range of motion in all directions due to pain. Right shoulder appearance and exam normal.
- CXR: normal
- EKG: sr 100; nl intervals, no acute changes
- WBC 13; hemoglobin 14
- Na 134, k 4.6; creat 2.8 (1.8 baseline 4 m ago); bicarb 24
- LFTs and UA normal
- Vancomycin and Zosyn for now
- Orthopedics to see asap to aspirate shoulder for definitive diagnosis
- If aspiration is consistent with infection, will need to go to Operating Room for wash out.
- Urine electrolytes
- Follow-up on creatinine and obtain renal ultrasound if not improved
- Renal dosing of meds
- Strict Ins and Outs.
- follow exam
- obtain additional input from family to assure baseline is, in fact, normal
- Since admission (6 hours) no change in shoulder pain
- This morning, pleasant, easily distracted; knows he’s in the hospital, but not date or year
- T Current 101F Pulse 100 BP 140/80
- Ins and Outs: IVF Normal Saline 3L/Urine output 1.5 liters
- L shoulder with obvious swelling and warmth compared with right; no skin breaks; pain limits any active or passive range of motion to less than 10 degrees in all directions
- Labs this morning remarkable for WBC 10 (from 13), creatinine 2 (down from 2.8)
- Continue with Vancomycin and Zosyn for now
- I already paged Orthopedics this morning, who are en route for aspiration of shoulder, fluid for gram stain, cell count, culture
- If aspirate consistent with infection, then likely to the OR
- Continue IVF at 125/h, follow I/O
- Repeat creatinine later today
- Not on any nephrotoxins, meds renaly dosed
- Continue antibiotics, evaluation for primary source as above
- Discuss with family this morning to establish baseline; possible may have underlying dementia as well
- SC Heparin for DVT prophylaxis
- Code status: full code/full care.
Outpatient-based presentations
There are 4 main types of visits that commonly occur in an outpatient continuity clinic environment, each of which has its own presentation style and purpose. These include the following, each described in detail below.
- The patient who is presenting for their first visit to a primary care clinic and is entirely new to the physician.
- The patient who is returning to primary care for a scheduled follow-up visit.
- The patient who is presenting with an acute problem to a primary care clinic
- The specialty clinic evaluation (new or follow-up)
It’s worth noting that Primary care clinics (Internal Medicine, Family Medicine and Pediatrics) typically take responsibility for covering all of the patient’s issues, though the amount of energy focused on any one topic will depend on the time available, acuity, symptoms, and whether that issue is also followed by a specialty clinic.
The Brand New Primary Care Patient
Purpose of the presentation
- Accurately review all of the patient’s history as well as any new concerns that they might have.
- Identify health related problems that need additional evaluation and/or treatment
- Provide an opportunity for senior listeners to intervene and offer input
Key features of the presentation
- If this is truly their first visit, then one of the main reasons is typically to "establish care" with a new doctor.
- It might well include continuation of therapies and/or evaluations started elsewhere.
- If the patient has other specific goals (medications, referrals, etc.), then this should be stated as well. Note: There may well not be a "chief complaint."
- For a new patient, this is an opportunity to highlight the main issues that might be troubling/bothering them.
- This can include chronic disorders (e.g. diabetes, congestive heart failure, etc.) which cause ongoing symptoms (shortness of breath) and/or generate daily data (finger stick glucoses) that should be discussed.
- Sometimes, there are no specific areas that the patient wishes to discuss up-front.
- Review of systems (ROS): This is typically comprehensive, covering all organ systems. If the patient is known to have certain illnesses (e.g. diabetes), then the ROS should include the search for disorders with high prevalence (e.g. vascular disease). There should also be some consideration for including questions that are epidemiologically appropriate (e.g. based on age and sex).
- Past Medical History (PMH): All known medical conditions (in particular those requiring ongoing treatment) are listed, noting their duration and time of onset. If a condition is followed by a specialist or co-managed with other clinicians, this should be noted as well. If a problem was described in detail during the “acute” history, it doesn’t have to be re-stated here.
- Past Surgical History (PSH): All surgeries, along with the year when they were performed
- Medications and allergies: All meds, including dosage, frequency and over-the-counter preparations. Allergies (and the type of reaction) should be described.
- Social: Work, hobbies, exposures.
- Sexual activity – may include type of activity, number and sex of partner(s), partner’s health.
- Smoking, Alcohol, other drug use: including quantification of consumption, duration of use.
- Family history: Focus on heritable illness amongst first degree relatives. May also include whether patient married, in a relationship, children (and their ages).
- Physical Exam: Vital signs and relevant findings (or their absence).
- Key labs and imaging if they’re available. Also when and where they were obtained.
- Summary, assessment & plan(s) presented by organ system and/or problems. As many systems/problems as is necessary to cover all of the active issues that are relevant to that clinic. This typically concludes with a “health care maintenance” section, which covers age, sex and risk factor appropriate vaccinations and screening tests.
The Follow-up Visit to a Primary Care Clinic
- Organize the presenter (forces you to think things through).
- Accurately review any relevant interval health care events that might have occurred since the last visit.
- Identification of new symptoms or health related issues that might need additional evaluation and/or treatment
- If the patient has no concerns, then verification that health status is stable
- Review of medications
- Provide an opportunity for listeners to intervene and offer input
- Reason for the visit: Follow-up for whatever the patient’s main issues are, as well as stating when the last visit occurred *Note: There may well not be a “chief complaint,” as patients followed in continuity at any clinic may simply be returning for a visit as directed by their doctor.
- Events since the last visit: This might include emergency room visits, input from other clinicians/specialists, changes in medications, new symptoms, etc.
- Review of Systems (ROS): Depth depends on patient’s risk factors and known illnesses. If the patient has diabetes, then a vascular ROS would be done. On the other hand, if the patient is young and healthy, the ROS could be rather cursory.
- PMH, PSH, Social, Family, Habits are all OMITTED. This is because these facts are already known to the listener and actionable aspects have presumably been added to the problem list (presented at the end). That said, these elements can be restated if the patient has a new symptom or issue related to a historical problem has emerged.
- MEDS : A good idea to review these at every visit.
- Physical exam: Vital signs and pertinent findings (or absence there of) are mentioned.
- Lab and Imaging: The reason why these were done should be mentioned and any key findings mentioned, highlighting changes from baseline.
- Assessment and Plan: This is most clearly done by individually stating all of the conditions/problems that are being addressed (e.g. hypertension, hypothyroidism, depression, etc.) followed by their specific plan(s). If a new or acute issue was identified during the visit, the diagnostic and therapeutic plan for that concern should be described.
The Focused Visit to a Primary Care Clinic
- Accurately review the historical events that lead the patient to make the appointment.
- Identification of risk factors and/or other underlying medical conditions that might affect the diagnostic or therapeutic approach to the new symptom or concern.
- Generate an appropriate assessment and plan
- Allow the listener to comment
Key features of the presentation:
- Reason for the visit
- History of Present illness: Description of the sequence of symptoms and/or events that lead to the patient’s current condition.
- Review of Systems: To an appropriate depth that will allow the listener to grasp the full range of diagnostic possibilities that relate to the presenting problem.
- PMH and PSH: Stating only those elements that might relate to the presenting symptoms/issues.
- PE: Vital signs and key findings (or lack thereof)
- Labs and imaging (if done)
- Assessment and Plan: This is usually very focused and relates directly to the main presenting symptom(s) or issues.
The Specialty Clinic Visit
Specialty clinic visits focus on the health care domains covered by those physicians. For example, Cardiology clinics are interested in cardiovascular disease related symptoms, events, labs, imaging and procedures. Orthopedics clinics will focus on musculoskeletal symptoms, events, imaging and procedures. Information that is unrelated to these disciples will typically be omitted. It’s always a good idea to ask the supervising physician for guidance as to what’s expected to be covered in a particular clinic environment.
- Highlight the reason(s) for the visit
- Review key data
- Provide an opportunity for the listener(s) to comment
- 5-7 minutes
- If it’s a consult, state the main reason(s) that the patient was referred as well as who referred them.
- If it’s a return visit, state the reasons why the patient is being followed in the clinic and when the last visit took place
- If it’s for an acute issue, state up front what the issue is Note: There may well not be a “chief complaint,” as patients followed in continuity in any clinic may simply be returning for a return visit as directed
- For a new patient, this highlights the main things that might be troubling/bothering the patient.
- For a specialty clinic, the history presented typically relates to the symptoms and/or events that are pertinent to that area of care.
- Review of systems , focusing on those elements relevant to that clinic. For a cardiology patient, this will highlight a vascular ROS.
- PMH/PSH that helps to inform the current presentation (e.g. past cardiac catheterization findings/interventions for a patient with chest pain) and/or is otherwise felt to be relevant to that clinic environment.
- Meds and allergies: Typically all meds are described, as there is always the potential for adverse drug interactions.
- Social/Habits/other: as relates to/informs the presentation and/or is relevant to that clinic
- Family history: Focus is on heritable illness amongst first degree relatives
- Physical Exam: VS and relevant findings (or their absence)
- Key labs, imaging: For a cardiology clinic patient, this would include echos, catheterizations, coronary interventions, etc.
- Summary, assessment & plan(s) by organ system and/or problems. As many systems/problems as is necessary to cover all of the active issues that are relevant to that clinic.
- Reason for visit: Patient is a 67 year old male presenting for first office visit after admission for STEMI. He was referred by Dr. Goins, his PMD.
- The patient initially presented to the ER 4 weeks ago with acute CP that started 1 hour prior to his coming in. He was found to be in the midst of a STEMI with ST elevations across the precordial leads.
- Taken urgently to cath, where 95% proximal LAD lesion was stented
- EF preserved by Echo; Peak troponin 10
- In-hospital labs were remarkable for normal cbc, chem; LDL 170, hdl 42, nl lfts
- Uncomplicated hospital course, sent home after 3 days.
- Since home, he states that he feels great.
- Denies chest pain, sob, doe, pnd, edema, or other symptoms.
- No symptoms of stroke or TIA.
- No history of leg or calf pain with ambulation.
- Prior to this admission, he had a history of hypertension which was treated with lisinopril
- 40 pk yr smoking history, quit during hospitalization
- No known prior CAD or vascular disease elsewhere. No known diabetes, no family history of vascular disease; He thinks his cholesterol was always “a little high” but doesn’t know the numbers and was never treated with meds.
- History of depression, well treated with prozac
- Discharge meds included: aspirin, metoprolol 50 bid, lisinopril 10, atorvastatin 80, Plavix; in addition he takes Prozac for depression
- Taking all of them as directed.
- Patient lives with his wife; they have 2 grown children who are no longer at home
- Works as a computer programmer
- Smoking as above
- ETOH: 1 glass of wine w/dinner
- No drug use
- No known history of cardiovascular disease among 2 siblings or parents.
- Well appearing; BP 130/80, Pulse 80 regular, 97% sat on Room Air, weight 175lbs, BMI 32
- Lungs: clear to auscultation
- CV: s1 s2 no s3 s4 murmur
- No carotid bruits
- ABD: no masses
- Ext; no edema; distal pulses 2+
- Cath from 4 weeks ago: R dominant; 95% proximal LAD; 40% Cx.
- EF by TTE 1 day post PCI with mild Anterior Hypokinesis, EF 55%, no valvular disease, moderate LVH
- Labs of note from the hospital following cath: hgb 14, plt 240; creat 1, k 4.2, lfts normal, glucose 100, LDL 170, HDL 42.
- EKG today: SR at 78; nl intervals; nl axis; normal r wave progression, no q waves
- Plan: aspirin 81 indefinitely, Plavix x 1y
- Given nitroglycerine sublingual to have at home.
- Reviewed symptoms that would indicate another MI and what to do if occurred
- Plan: continue with current dosages of meds
- Chem 7 today to check k, creatinine
- Plan: Continue atorvastatin 80mg for life
- Smoking cessation: Doing well since discharge without adjuvant treatments, aware of supports.
- Plan: AAA screening ultrasound
IMAGES
VIDEO