research paper of human resource management

Sustainable HRM and well-being: systematic review and future research agenda

• Published: 14 July 2023

Cite this article

• Faisal Qamar   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-4916-8229 1 ,
• Gul Afshan   ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-0016-5721 1 &
• Salman Anwar Rana 1  

1283 Accesses

7 Citations

Explore all metrics

This paper attempts to undertake a systematic literature review to identify ways and means by which sustainable human resource management (HRM) and well-being are linked for better individual and organizational outcomes. Its primary focus is to study whether sustainable HRM predicts well-being at work? If yes, how and when this prediction takes place? Systematic computerized search and review were conducted for articles published until December 2022. A total of 134 research articles were finally selected. It was found that sustainable HRM predicts well-being at work. However, our findings suggest that the area is largely underexplored and empirical work is too rare. Although few moderators and mediators are examined, research is required to propose and test more comprehensive models with more robust research designs and sophisticated theoretical links.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA) Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Rent this article via DeepDyve

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Moving beyond the link between hrm and economic performance: a study on the individual reactions of hr managers and professionals to sustainable hrm.

Creating Sustainable Human Resource Management Systems for High-Performance Work Culture

Practitioner’s View on Sustainability and HRM

Data availability.

Information/data of all the research papers analysed during this study are included in the body of this manuscript and its appendix. Any further information related to earlier research papers considered for this review are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Aboramadan M, Kundi YM, Becker A (2021) Green human resource management in nonprofit organizations: effects on employee green behavior and the role of perceived green organizational support. Pers Rev Ahead-of-Print. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-02-2021-0078

Article   Google Scholar  

Adjei-Bamfo P, Bempong B, Osei J, Kusi-Sarpong S (2020) Green candidate selection for organizational environmental management. Int J Manpow 41:1081–1096. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-10-2019-0480

Agarwal V, Mathiyazhagan K, Malhotra S, Saikouk T (2021) Analysis of challenges in sustainable human resource management due to disruptions by Industry 4.0: an emerging economy perspective. Int J Manpow. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-03-2021-0192

Ahmad I, Umrani WA (2019) The impact of ethical leadership style on job satisfaction. Leadersh Organ Dev J 40:534–547. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-12-2018-0461

Al Kerdawy MMA (2019) The role of corporate support for employee volunteering in strengthening the impact of green human resource management practices on corporate social responsibility in the Egyptian Firms. Eur Manag Rev 16:1079–1095. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12310

Al Marzouqi AH, Khan M, Hussain M (2020) Employee social sustainability: prioritizing dimensions in the UAE’s airlines industry. Soc Responsib J 16:349–367. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-07-2018-0166

Alberton A, Kieling AP, Lyra FR, Hoffmann EM, Lopez MPV, Stefano SR (2020) Competencies for sustainability in hotels: insights from Brazil. Empl Relat Int J. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-01-2019-0093

Alcaraz JM, Susaeta L, Suarez E, Colon C, Gutiérrez-Martínez I, Cunha R, Leguizamón F, Idrovo S, Weisz N, Correia MF (2019) The human resources management contribution to social responsibility and environmental sustainability: explorations from Ibero-America. Int J Hum Resour Manag 30:3166–3189

Almarzooqi AH, Khan M, Khalid K (2019) The role of sustainable HRM in sustaining positive organizational outcomes. Int J Product Perform Manag 68:1272–1292. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-04-2018-0165

Al-Minhas U, Ndubisi NO, Barrane FZ (2020) Corporate environmental management. Manag Environ Qual Int J 31:431–450. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-07-2019-0161

Alvarez-Risco A, Estrada-Merino A, Perez-Luyo R (2020) Sustainable development goals in hospitality management. In: Ruël H, Lombarts A (eds) Sustainable hospitality management. Emerald Publishing Limited, pp 159–178

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Amrutha V, Geetha S (2020) A systematic review on green human resource management: Implications for social sustainability. J Clean Prod 247:119131

Anlesinya A, Amponsah-Tawiah K (2020) Towards a responsible talent management model. Eur J Train Dev 44:279–303. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-07-2019-0114

Anlesinya A, Susomrith P (2020) Sustainable human resource management: a systematic review of a developing field. J Glob Responsib

App S, Büttgen M (2016) Lasting footprints of the employer brand: can sustainable HRM lead to brand commitment? Empl Relat 38:703–723. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-06-2015-0122

Ardichvili A (2012) Sustainability or limitless expansion: paradigm shift in HRD practice and teaching. Eur J Train Dev 36:873–887. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090591211280946

Arnold KA (2017) Transformational leadership and employee psychological well-being: a review and directions for future research. J Occup Health Psychol 22:381

Au WC, Ahmed PK (2014) Sustainable people management through work-life balance: a study of the Malaysian Chinese context. Asia-Pac J Bus Adm 6:262–280. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-02-2014-0024

Aust I, Matthews B, Muller-Camen M (2020a) Common Good HRM: A paradigm shift in Sustainable HRM? Hum Resour Manag Rev 30:100705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100705

Aust I, Matthews B, Muller-Camen M (2020b) Common Good HRM: A paradigm shift in Sustainable HRM? Sustain Hum Resour Manag Triple Bottom Line Multi-Stakehold Strateg Concepts Engagem 30:100705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100705

Barrena-Martínez J, López-Fernández M, Romero-Fernández PM (2019) Towards a configuration of socially responsible human resource management policies and practices: Findings from an academic consensus. Int J Hum Resour Manag 30:2544–2580

Baum T, Hai NTT (2019) Applying sustainable employment principles in the tourism industry: righting human rights wrongs? Tour Recreat Res 44:371–381

Google Scholar  

Beer M, Boselie P, Brewster C (2015) Back to the future: implications for the field of HRM of the multistakeholder perspective proposed 30 years ago. Hum Resour Manage 54:427–438. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21726

Bondarouk T, Brewster C (2016) Conceptualising the future of HRM and technology research. Int J Hum Resour Manag 27:2652–2671

Brannon DW, Burbach R (2021) Sustaining hospitality talent pools through a common pool resource lens. In: Jooss S, Burbach R, Ruël H (eds) Talent management innovations in the international hospitality industry. Emerald Publishing Limited, pp 53–78

Brunetto Y, Farr-Wharton B, Wankhade P, Saccon C, Xerri M (2022) Managing emotional labour: the importance of organisational support for managing police officers in England and Italy. Int J Hum Resour Manag 1–23

Bush JT (2020) Win-Win-Lose? Sustainable HRM and the promotion of unsustainable employee outcomes. Hum Resour Manag Rev 30:100676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2018.11.004

Cabral C, Dhar RL (2021) Green competencies: insights and recommendations from a systematic literature review. Benchmark Int J 28:66–105. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-11-2019-0489

Caldana ACF, Eustachio JHPP, Lespinasse Sampaio B, Gianotto ML, Talarico AC, da Batalhão SAC (2021) A hybrid approach to sustainable development competencies: the role of formal, informal and non-formal learning experiences. Int J Sustain High Educ. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-10-2020-0420

Chams N, García-Blandón J (2019) On the importance of sustainable human resource management for the adoption of sustainable development goals. Resour Conserv Recycl 141:109–122

Chaudhary R (2019) Green human resource management and job pursuit intention: examining the underlying processes. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 26:929–937. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1732

Chaudhary R (2020) Corporate social responsibility and employee performance: a study among indian business executives. Int J Hum Resour Manag 31:2761–2784

Chillakuri B (2020) Understanding generation Z expectations for effective onboarding. J Organ Change Manag 33:1277–1296. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-02-2020-0058

Chillakuri B, Vanka S (2020) Understanding the effects of perceived organizational support and high-performance work systems on health harm through sustainable HRM lens: a moderated mediated examination. Empl Relat Int J Ahead-of-Print. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-01-2019-0046

Chillakuri B, Vanka S (2021) Examining the effects of workplace well-being and high-performance work systems on health harm: a sustainable HRM perspective. Soc Bus Rev 16:71–93. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-03-2020-0033

Christina S, Dainty A, Daniels K, Tregaskis O, Waterson P (2017) Shut the fridge door! HRM alignment, job redesign and energy performance. Hum Resour Manag J 27:382–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12144

Clarke M (2011) Readings in HRM and Sustainability. Melb Tilde 117–132

Cook DJ, Mulrow CD, Haynes RB (1997) Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Ann Intern Med 126:376–380

Cooke FL, Dickmann M, Parry E (2020) IJHRM after 30 years: taking stock in times of COVID-19 and looking towards the future of HR research. Int J Hum Resour Manag 32:1–23

Cooke FL, Xiao M, Chen Y (2021) Still in search of strategic human resource management? A review and suggestions for future research with China as an example. Hum Resour Manage 60:89–118

Cooper B, Wang J, Bartram T, Cooke FL (2019) Well-being-oriented human resource management practices and employee performance in the Chinese banking sector: The role of social climate and resilience. Hum Resour Manage 58:85–97

Csath M (2022) Organizational learning as the best business practice for adaptation in times of great changes: a viewpoint. Dev Learn Organ Int J

Dao V, Langella I, Carbo J (2011) From green to sustainability: information technology and an integrated sustainability framework. Green IT 20:63–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2011.01.002

de Freitas SWR, Caldeira-Oliveira JH, Teixeira AA, Stefanelli NO, Teixeira TB (2020) Green human resource management and corporate social responsibility. Benchmark Int J 27:1551–1569. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-12-2019-0543

de Freitas SWR, Caldeira Oliveira JH, Teixeira AA, Stefanelli NO (2021) Green human resource management, corporate social responsibility and customer relationship management: relationship analysis in the Brazilian context. Int J Product Perform Manag 70:1705–1727. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-12-2019-0597

De Prins P, Van Beirendonck L, De Vos A, Segers J (2014) Sustainable HRM: bridging theory and practice through the ’respect openness continuity (ROC)’-model. Manag Rev 25:263–284

De Prins P, Stuer D, Gielens T (2020) Revitalizing social dialogue in the workplace: the impact of a cooperative industrial relations climate and sustainable HR practices on reducing employee harm. Int J Hum Resour Manag 31:1684–1704

De Witte H, Pienaar J, De Cuyper N (2016) Review of 30 years of longitudinal studies on the association between job insecurity and health and well-being: Is there causal evidence? Aust Psychol 51:18–31

De-la-Calle-Durán M-C, Rodríguez-Sánchez J-L (2021) Employee engagement and wellbeing in times of COVID-19: a proposal of the 5Cs model. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18:5470

del-Castillo-Feito C, Blanco-González A, Hernández-Perlines F (2022) The impacts of socially responsible human resources management on organizational legitimacy. Technol Forecast Soc Change 174:121274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121274

Denyer D, Tranfield D (2009) Producing a systematic review

Deshwal P (2015) Green HRM: an organizational strategy of greening people. Int J Appl Res 1:176–181

Di Vaio A, Palladino R, Hassan R, Escobar O (2020) Artificial intelligence and business models in the sustainable development goals perspective: a systematic literature review. J Bus Res 121:283–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.019

Diaz-Carrion R, López-Fernández M, Romero-Fernandez PM (2018) Developing a sustainable HRM system from a contextual perspective. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 25:1143–1153. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1528

Diaz-Carrion R, López-Fernández M, Romero-Fernandez PM (2020) Sustainable human resource management and employee engagement: a holistic assessment instrument. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 27:1749–1760. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1921

Diaz-Carrion R, López-Fernández M, Romero-Fernandez PM (2021) Constructing an index for comparing human resources management sustainability in Europe. Hum Resour Manag J 31:120–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12286

Díez-Martín F, Blanco-González A, Díez-de-Castro E (2021) Measuring a scientifically multifaceted concept. The jungle of organizational legitimacy. Eur Res Manag Bus Econ 27:100131

Dixon-Fowler H, O’Leary-Kelly A, Johnson J, Waite M (2020) Sustainability and ideology-infused psychological contracts: An organizational- and employee-level perspective. Hum Resour Manag Rev 30:100690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100690

Donald WE, Baruch Y, Ashleigh MJ (2020) Striving for sustainable graduate careers. Career Dev Int 25:90–110. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-03-2019-0079

DuBois CLZ, Dubois DA (2012) Strategic HRM as social design for environmental sustainability in organization. Hum Resour Manage 51:799–826. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21504

Ehnert I, Harry W, Zink KJ (2014) Sustainability and HRM. In: Sustainability and human resource management. Springer, pp 3–32

ElAlfy A, Palaschuk N, El-Bassiouny D, Wilson J, Weber O (2020) Scoping the evolution of corporate social responsibility (CSR) research in the sustainable development goals (SDGs) era. Sustainability 12:5544

Elkington J (1999) Triple bottom-line reporting: looking for balance. Aust CPA 69:18–21

Gardas BB, Mangla SK, Raut RD, Narkhede B, Luthra S (2019) Green talent management to unlock sustainability in the oil and gas sector. J Clean Prod 229:850–862

Ghouri AM, Mani V, Khan MR, Khan NR, Srivastava AP (2020) Enhancing business performance through green human resource management practices: an empirical evidence from Malaysian manufacturing industry. Int J Product Perform Manag 69:1585–1607. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-11-2019-0520

Gollan PJ (2000) Human resources, capabilities and sustainability

Gould-Williams J (2003) The importance of HR practices and workplace trust in achieving superior performance: a study of public-sector organizations. Int J Hum Resour Manag 14:28–54

Greenwood M, Anderson E (2009) ‘I used to be an employee but now I am a stakeholder’: implications of labelling employees as stakeholders. Asia Pac J Hum Resour 47:186–200

Greve HR (2021) The resource-based view and learning theory: overlaps, differences, and a shared future. J Manag 47:1720–1733

Guerci M, Shani ABR, Solari L (2014) A stakeholder perspective for sustainable HRM. Sustain Hum Resour Manag 205–223

Gutiérrez Crocco F, Martin A (2019) Towards a sustainable HRM in Latin America? Union-management relationship in Chile. Empl Relat Int J. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-01-2019-0036

Hameed Z, Naeem RM, Hassan M, Naeem M, Nazim M, Maqbool A (2021) How GHRM is related to green creativity? A moderated mediation model of green transformational leadership and green perceived organizational support. Int J Manpow. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-05-2020-0244

Hooi LW, Liu M-S, Lin JJJ (2021) Green human resource management and green organizational citizenship behavior: do green culture and green values matter? Int J Manpow Ahead-of-Print. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-05-2020-0247

Hu X, Jiang Z (2018) Employee-oriented HRM and voice behavior: a moderated mediation model of moral identity and trust in management. Int J Hum Resour Manag 29:746–771

Jackson SE, Seo J (2010) The greening of strategic HRM scholarship. Organ Manag J 7:278–290

Jang S, Ardichvili A (2020) The role of HRD in CSR and sustainability: a content analysis of corporate responsibility reports. Eur J Train Dev 44:549–573. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-01-2020-0006

Jerónimo HM, de Lacerda TC, Henriques PL (2020) From sustainable HRM to employee performance: a complex and intertwined road. Eur Manag Rev 17:871–884. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12402

Jithendran K, Baum T (2000) Human resources development and sustainability—the case of Indian tourism. Int J Tour Res 2:403–421

Kainzbauer A, Rungruang P, Hallinger P (2021) How does research on sustainable human resource management contribute to corporate sustainability: a document co-citation analysis, 1982–2021. Sustainability 13:11745

Kane C (2022) The future workplace: reimagining the office for the twenty-first century. in: european cities after COVID-19. Springer, pp 179–195

Kashyap V, Arora R (2020) Decent work and work–family enrichment: role of meaning at work and work engagement. Int J Product Perform Manag Ahead-of-Print. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-03-2020-0133

Kassen M (2022) Open data governance as a theoretical concept: a stakeholder and institutional analysis. In: Open data governance and its actors. Springer, pp 1–28

Kelloway EK, Barling J (1991) Job characteristics, role stress and mental health. J Occup Psychol 64:291–304

Kelman I (2021) Words without meaning? Examining sustainable development terminology through small states and territories. Small States Territories 4:231–244

Khan KS, Kunz R, Kleijnen J, Antes G (2003) Five steps to conducting a systematic review. J R Soc Med 96:118–121

Kitchenham B (2004) Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele UK Keele Univ 33:1–26

Kowalski TH, Loretto W (2017) Well-being and HRM in the changing workplace. Int J Hum Resour Manag 28:2229–2255

Kramar R (2014) Beyond strategic human resource management: is sustainable human resource management the next approach? Int J Hum Resour Manag 25:1069–1089

Kramar R (2021) Workplace performance: a sustainable approach. Asia Pac J Hum Resour 59:567–581. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12289

Kumar Pradhan R, Prasad Panigrahy N, Kesari Jena L (2021) Self-efficacy and workplace well-being: understanding the role of resilience in manufacturing organizations. Bus Perspect Res 9:62–76

Kundu SC, Gahlawat N (2015) Socially responsible HR practices and employees’ intention to quit: The mediating role of job satisfaction. Hum Resour Dev Int 18:387–406

Lange T (2016) Sustainable HRM and employee well-being: an empirical agenda. Int J Manpow 37:918–923

Lansbury RD (2021) Introduction to the symposium ‘transforming our future: a new social contract at work’? Asia Pac J Hum Resour

Lăzăroiu G, Ionescu L, Andronie M, Dijmărescu I (2020) Sustainability management and performance in the urban corporate economy: a systematic literature review. Sustainability 12:7705

Lechuga Sancho MP, Martínez-Martínez D, Larran Jorge M, Herrera Madueño J (2018) Understanding the link between socially responsible human resource management and competitive performance in SMEs. Pers Rev 47:1211–1243. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-05-2017-0165

Lee H-W (2017) Sustainable leadership: An empirical investigation of its effect on organizational effectiveness. Int J Organ Theory Behav 20:419–453. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOTB-20-04-2017-B001

Lee H-W (2019) How does sustainability-oriented human resource management work?: examining mediators on organizational performance. Int J Public Adm 42:974–984

Lisovskaia A (2022) Implementing well-being practices through russian context: HRD perspective. J East-West Bus 1–16

Lombardi R, Manfredi S, Cuozzo B, Palmaccio M (2020) The profitable relationship among corporate social responsibility and human resource management: a new sustainable key factor. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 27:2657–2667. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1990

Longoni A, Cagliano R (2016) Human resource and customer benefits through sustainable operations. Int J Oper Prod Manag 36:1719–1740. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-11-2014-0564

Lopez-Cabrales A, Valle-Cabrera R (2020) Sustainable HRM strategies and employment relationships as drivers of the triple bottom line. Hum Resour Manag Rev 30:100689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100689

Luu TT (2021a) Socially responsible human resource practices and hospitality employee outcomes. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag 33:757–789. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-02-2020-0164

Luu TT (2021b) A tale of two countries: How do employees with disabilities respond to disability inclusive HR practices in tourism and hospitality industry? J Sustain Tour. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2021.1876073

Macini N, Fernandes Rodrigues Alves M, Oranges Cezarino L, Bartocci Liboni L, Cristina Ferreira Caldana A (2020) Beyond money and reputation: sustainable HRM in Brazilian banks. Empl Relat Int J Ahead-of-Print. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-12-2018-0331

Macke J, Genari D (2019) Systematic literature review on sustainable human resource management. J Clean Prod 208:806–815

Maheshwari M, Samal A, Bhamoriya V (2020) Role of employee relations and HRM in driving commitment to sustainability in MSME firms. Int J Product Perform Manag 69:1743–1764. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-12-2019-0599

Mak A, Cheung L, Mak A, Leung L (2014) Confucian thinking and the implications for sustainability in HRM. Asia-Pac J Bus Adm 6:173–189. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-02-2014-0029

Malik SY, Hayat Mughal Y, Azam T, Cao Y, Wan Z, Zhu H, Thurasamy R (2021) Corporate social responsibility, green human resources management, and sustainable performance: Is organizational citizenship behavior towards environment the missing link? Sustainability 13:1044

Mariappanadar S (2003) Sustainable human resource strategy. Int J Soc Econ 30:906–923. https://doi.org/10.1108/03068290310483779

Mariappanadar S (2012a) The harm indicators of negative externality of efficiency focused organizational practices. Int J Soc Econ 39:209–220. https://doi.org/10.1108/03068291211199378

Mariappanadar S (2012b) Harm of efficiency oriented HRM practices on stakeholders: an ethical issue for sustainability. Soc Bus Rev 7:168–184. https://doi.org/10.1108/17465681211237628

Mariappanadar S (2013) A conceptual framework for cost measures of harm of HRM practices. Asia-Pac J Bus Adm 5:103–114. https://doi.org/10.1108/17574321311321595

Mariappanadar S (2014) Stakeholder harm index: A framework to review work intensification from the critical HRM perspective. Hum Resour Manag Rev 24:313–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2014.03.009

Mariappanadar S (2016) Health harm of work from the sustainable HRM perspective: scale development and validation. Int J Manpow 37:924–944. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-12-2015-0204

Mariappanadar S (2020) Do HRM systems impose restrictions on employee quality of life? Evidence from a sustainable HRM perspective. J Bus Res 118:38–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.039

Mariappanadar S, Aust I (2017) The dark side of overwork: an empirical evidence of social harm of work from a sustainable HRM perspective. Int Stud Manag Organ 47:372–387

Mariappanadar S, Kramar R (2014) Sustainable HRM: The synthesis effect of high performance work systems on organisational performance and employee harm. Asia-Pac J Bus Adm. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-03-2014-0039

Mariappanadar S, Maurer I, Kramar R, Muller-Camen M (2021) Is it a sententious claim? An examination of the quality of occupational health, safety and well-being disclosures in global reporting initiative reports across industries and countries. Int Bus Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2021.101922

Mashhady A, Khalili H, Sameti A (2021) Development and application of a service design-based process for improvement of human resource management service quality. Bus Process Manag J 27:459–485. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-04-2020-0164

Mowbray PK, Wilkinson A, Tse HHM (2021) High-performance work systems and employee voice behaviour: an integrated model and research agenda. Pers Rev 50:1530–1543. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-12-2019-0692

Muisyo PK, Qin S, Julius MM, Ho TH, Ho TH (2021) Green HRM and employer branding: the role of collective affective commitment to environmental management change and environmental reputation. J Sustain Tour 1–18

Mujtaba M, Mubarik MS (2021) Talent management and organizational sustainability: role of sustainable behaviour. Int J Organ Anal Ahead-of-Print. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-06-2020-2253

Müller-Christ G, Remer A (1999) Environmental economics or business ecology? Preliminary thoughts on a theory of resource management. Oper Environ Manag 21st Century Asp Tasks Perspect 69–87

Nuis JW, Peters P, Blomme R, Kievit H (2021) Dialogues in sustainable HRM: examining and positioning intended and continuous dialogue in sustainable HRM using a complexity thinking approach. Sustainability 13:10853

O’Donohue W, Torugsa N (2016) The moderating effect of ‘Green’HRM on the association between proactive environmental management and financial performance in small firms. Int J Hum Resour Manag 27:239–261

Okoli C, Schabram K (2010) A guide to conducting a systematic literature review of information systems research

Omidi A, Dal Zotto C (2022) Socially responsible human resource management: a systematic literature review and research agenda. Sustainability 14:2116

Onkila T, Sarna B (2021) A systematic literature review on employee relations with CSR: state of art and future research agenda. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag n/a. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2210

Parng Y-J, Kurrahman T, Chen C-C, Tseng ML, Minh Hà H, Lin C-W (2021) Visualizing the hierarchical sustainable human resource management under qualitative information and complex interrelationships. Manag Environ Qual Int J 32:1422–1447. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-04-2021-0086

Paulet R, Holland P, Morgan D (2021) A meta-review of 10 years of green human resource management: is Green HRM headed towards a roadblock or a revitalisation? Asia Pac J Hum Resour 59:159–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12285

Pellegrini C, Rizzi F, Frey M (2018) The role of sustainable human resource practices in influencing employee behavior for corporate sustainability. Bus Strategy Environ 27:1221–1232

Peng L, Liu H, Nie Y, Xie Y, Tang X, Luo P (2020) The transnational happiness study with big data technology. ACM Trans Asian Low-Resour Lang Inf Process TALLIP 20:1–12

Pham DDT, Paillé P (2020) Green recruitment and selection: an insight into green patterns. Int J Manpow 41:258–272. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-05-2018-0155

Piwowar-Sulej K (2021a) Human resources development as an element of sustainable HRM: with the focus on production engineers. J Clean Prod 278:124008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124008

Piwowar-Sulej K (2021b) Core functions of Sustainable Human Resource Management. A hybrid literature review with the use of H-Classics methodology. Sustain Dev

Pizzi S, Caputo A, Corvino A, Venturelli A (2020) Management research and the UN sustainable development goals (SDGs): a bibliometric investigation and systematic review. J Clean Prod 276:124033

Pluta A, Rudawska A (2016) Holistic approach to human resources and organizational acceleration. J Organ Change Manag 29:293–309. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-11-2014-0210

Podgorodnichenko N, Akmal A, Edgar F, Everett AM (2020a) Sustainable HRM: toward addressing diverse employee roles. Empl Relat Int J Ahead-of-Print. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-01-2019-0016

Podgorodnichenko N, Edgar F, McAndrew I (2020b) The role of HRM in developing sustainable organizations: Contemporary challenges and contradictions. Hum Resour Manag Rev 30:100685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.04.001

Podgorodnichenko N, Edgar F, Akmal A (2021) An integrative literature review of the CSR-HRM nexus: Learning from research-practice gaps. Hum Resour Manag Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100839

Poon TS-C, Law KK (2020) Sustainable HRM: An extension of the paradox perspective. Hum Resour Manag Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2020.100818

Pradhan RK, Jena LK, Panigrahy NP (2020) Do sustainability practices buffer the impact of self-efficacy on organisational citizenship behaviour? J Indian Bus Res 12:509–528. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIBR-05-2019-0170

Randev KK, Jha JK (2019) Sustainable human resource management: a literature-based introduction. NHRD Netw J 12:241–252

Ranjbari M, Esfandabadi ZS, Zanetti MC, Scagnelli SD, Siebers P-O, Aghbashlo M, Peng W, Quatraro F, Tabatabaei M (2021) Three pillars of sustainability in the wake of COVID-19: A systematic review and future research agenda for sustainable development. J Clean Prod 297:126660

Raub SP, Martin-Rios C (2019) “Think sustainable, act local”—a stakeholder-filter-model for translating SDGs into sustainability initiatives with local impact. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag 31:2428–2447. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-06-2018-0453

Ren S, Jackson SE (2020) HRM institutional entrepreneurship for sustainable business organizations. Hum Resour Manag Rev 30:100691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100691

Ribeiro RP, Gavronski I (2021) Sustainable management of human resources and stakeholder theory: a review. Rev Gest Soc E Ambient 15:e02729–e02729

Richards J (2020) Putting employees at the centre of sustainable HRM: a review, map and research agenda. Empl Relat Int J Ahead-of-Print. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-01-2019-0037

Rincon-Roldan F, Lopez-Cabrales A (2021a) Linking organisational values and sustainability: the role of AMO practices. Pers Rev Ahead-of-Print. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-06-2020-0414

Rincon-Roldan F, Lopez-Cabrales A (2021b) The impact of employment relationships on firm sustainability. Empl Relat Int J Ahead-of-Print. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-12-2020-0522

Robinson RN, Martins A, Solnet D, Baum T (2019) Sustaining precarity: critically examining tourism and employment. J Sustain Tour 27:1008–1025

Roca-Puig V (2019) The circular path of social sustainability: an empirical analysis. J Clean Prod 212:916–924

Rubel MRB, Kee DMH, Rimi NN (2021) The influence of green HRM practices on green service behaviors: the mediating effect of green knowledge sharing. Empl Relat Int J 43:996–1015. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-04-2020-0163

Samimi E, Sydow J (2021) Human resource management in project-based organizations: revisiting the permanency assumption. Int J Hum Resour Manag 32:49–83

Santana M, Lopez-Cabrales A (2019) Sustainable development and human resource management: a science mapping approach. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 26:1171–1183. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1765

Sarvaiya H, Arrowsmith J (2021) Exploring the context and interface of corporate social responsibility and HRM. Asia Pac J Hum Resour n/a. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12316

Sathasivam K, Che Hashim R, Abu Bakar R (2021) Automobile industry managers’ views on their roles in environmental sustainability: a qualitative study. Manag Environ Qual Int J 32:844–862. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-09-2020-0194

Schulte P, Vainio H (2010) Well-being at work–overview and perspective. Scand J Work Environ Health 422–429

Secundo G, Ndou V, Del Vecchio P, De Pascale G (2020) Sustainable development, intellectual capital and technology policies: a structured literature review and future research agenda. Technol Forecast Soc Change 153:119917

Shah SMA, Jiang Y, Wu H, Ahmed Z, Ullah I, Adebayo TS (2021) Linking green human resource practices and environmental economics performance: the role of green economic organizational culture and green psychological climate. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18:10953

Sharpley R (2020) Tourism, sustainable development and the theoretical divide: 20 years on. J Sustain Tour 28:1932–1946

Shoaib M, Abbas Z, Yousaf M, Zámečník R, Ahmed J, Saqib S (2021) The role of GHRM practices towards organizational commitment: a mediation analysis of green human capital. Cogent Bus Manag 8:1870798

Silva S, Nuzum A-K, Schaltegger S (2019) Stakeholder expectations on sustainability performance measurement and assessment. a systematic literature review. J Clean Prod 217:204–215

Singh S, Vanka S (2019) Voice matters: Why HR should listen to employee voice? Strateg HR Rev 18:268–271. https://doi.org/10.1108/SHR-04-2019-0026

Singh SK, Pradhan RK, Panigrahy NP, Jena LK (2019) Self-efficacy and workplace well-being: moderating role of sustainability practices. Benchmarking Int J 26:1692–1708. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-07-2018-0219

Sobhani FA, Haque A, Rahman S (2021) Socially responsible HRM, employee attitude, and bank reputation: the rise of CSR in Bangladesh. Sustainability 13:2753

Sorribes J, Celma D, Martínez-Garcia E (2021) Sustainable human resources management in crisis contexts: Interaction of socially responsible labour practices for the wellbeing of employees. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 28:936–952. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2111

Sotome R, Takahashi M (2014) Does the Japanese employment system harm productivity performance? Asia-Pac J Bus Adm 6:225–246. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-02-2014-0031

Southey K (2016) To fight, sabotage or steal: are all forms of employee misbehaviour created equal? Int J Manpow 37:1067–1084. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-12-2015-0219

Stahl GK, Brewster CJ, Collings DG, Hajro A (2020) Enhancing the role of human resource management in corporate sustainability and social responsibility: A multi-stakeholder, multidimensional approach to HRM. Sustain Hum Resour Manag Triple Bottom Line Multi-Stakehold Strateg Concepts Engagem 30:100708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2019.100708

Stankevičiūtė Ž, Savanevičienė A (2018) Designing sustainable HRM: the core characteristics of emerging field. Sustainability 10:4798

Stankevičiūtė Ž, Savanevičienė A (2019) Can sustainable HRM reduce work-related stress, work-family conflict, and burnout? Int Stud Manag Organ 49:79–98

Teeuwisse V, Brannon DW (2020) A qualititaive exploration of sustainble talent management of hospitality interns’ career intentions based on their pre-, post- and present practical placement experiences. In: Ruël H, Lombarts A (eds) Sustainable hospitality management. Emerald Publishing Limited, pp 63–82

Tworzydło D, Gawroński S, Opolska-Bielańska A, Lach M (2021) Changes in the demand for CSR activities and stakeholder engagement based on research conducted among public relations specialists in Poland, with consideration of the SARS-COV-2 pandemic. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag n/a. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2189

Úbeda-García M, Claver-Cortés E, Marco-Lajara B, Zaragoza-Sáez P (2021) Corporate social responsibility and firm performance in the hotel industry. the mediating role of green human resource management and environmental outcomes. J Bus Res 123:57–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.055

Van Buren III HJ (2020) The value of including employees: a pluralist perspective on sustainable HRM. Empl Relat Int J Ahead-of-Print. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-01-2019-0041

Van Dam K, Van Vuuren T, Kemps S (2017) Sustainable employment: the importance of intrinsically valuable work and an age-supportive climate. Int J Hum Resour Manag 28:2449–2472

Vecchi A, Della Piana B, Feola R, Crudele C (2021) Talent management processes and outcomes in a virtual organization. Bus Process Manag J 27:1937–1965. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-06-2019-0227

Vyas L (2022) “New normal” at work in a post-COVID world: work–life balance and labor markets. Policy Soc 41:155–167

Wellton L, Lainpelto J (2021) The intertwinement of professional knowledge culture, leadership practices and sustainability in the restaurant industry. Scand J Hosp Tour 21:550–566

Westerman JW, Rao MB, Vanka S, Gupta M (2020) Sustainable human resource management and the triple bottom line: Multi-stakeholder strategies, concepts, and engagement. Hum Resour Manag Rev 30:100742

WHO (2021) Comprehensive Mental Health Action Plan 2013–2030

Wikhamn W (2019) Innovation, sustainable HRM and customer satisfaction. Int J Hosp Manag 76:102–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.04.009

Wright PM, Steinbach AL (2022) Pivoting after almost 50 years of SHRM research: toward a stakeholder view. Asia Pac J Hum Resour 60:22–40

Xiao Y, Watson M (2019) Guidance on conducting a systematic literature review. J Plan Educ Res 39:93–112

Yang W, Nawakitphaitoon K, Huang W, Harney B, Gollan PJ, Xu CY (2019) Towards better work in China: mapping the relationships between high-performance work systems, trade unions, and employee well-being. Asia Pac J Hum Resour 57:553–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12205

Ybema JF, van Vuuren T, van Dam K (2020) HR practices for enhancing sustainable employability: implementation, use, and outcomes. Int J Hum Resour Manag 31:886–907

Yong JY, Yusliza M-Y, Jabbour CJC, Ahmad NH (2020) Exploratory cases on the interplay between green human resource management and advanced green manufacturing in light of the ability-motivation-opportunity theory. J Manag Dev 39:31–49. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-12-2018-0355

Yusliza M-Y, Norazmi NA, Jabbour CJC, Fernando Y, Fawehinmi O, Seles BMRP (2019) Top management commitment, corporate social responsibility and green human resource management. Benchmarking Int J 26:2051–2078. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-09-2018-0283

Zaugg RJ, Blum A, Thom N (2001) Sustainability in human resource management. Eval Rep Surv Eur Co Inst Arbeitsbericht Inst Für Organ Pers Univ Bern Eidgenöss Pers

Zheng X, Zhu W, Zhao H, Zhang C (2015) Employee well-being in organizations: theoretical model, scale development, and cross-cultural validation. J Organ Behav 36:621–644. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1990

Zink KJ (2011) The contribution of quality of work to organisational excellence. Total Qual Manag Bus Excell 22:567–585

Download references

Acknowledgements

There are no acknowledgements for this manuscript.

The authors declare that no funds, grants or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Department of Business Administration, Sukkur IBA University, Sukkur, Pakistan

Faisal Qamar, Gul Afshan & Salman Anwar Rana

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

Dr. GA and Mr. FQ contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation and analysis were performed by Mr. FQ and Mr. SR. The first draft of the manuscript was prepared by Mr. FQ. Dr. GA and Mr. SR then commented on previous versions of the manuscript. Mr. SR significantly contributed to prepare the final manuscript alongwith Mr. Faisal. Dr. GA supervised the overall work. Finally, all the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Faisal Qamar .

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest.

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Qamar, F., Afshan, G. & Rana, S.A. Sustainable HRM and well-being: systematic review and future research agenda. Manag Rev Q (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-023-00360-6

Download citation

Received : 16 November 2022

Accepted : 21 June 2023

Published : 14 July 2023

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-023-00360-6

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Psychological health
• Sustainable HRM
• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

human resource management Recently Published Documents

Total documents.

• Latest Documents
• Most Cited Documents
• Contributed Authors
• Related Sources
• Related Keywords

Analysis of human resource management challenges in implementation of industry 4.0 in Indian automobile industry

Top management green commitment and green intellectual capital as enablers of hotel environmental performance: the mediating role of green human resource management, the study of knowledge employee voice among the knowledge-based companies: the case of an emerging economy.

PurposeA review of previous studies on the voices of employees and knowledge workers clarifies that paying attention to employees' voice is critical in human resource management. However, limited studies have been conducted on it, and much less emphasis has been placed compared to other human resource management activities such as human resource planning. Therefore, the voice of knowledge employees has been one of the critical issues that have attracted a great deal of attention recently. Nonetheless, there is no evidence of various comprehensive and integrated voice mechanisms. As a result, this study aims to design knowledge workers' voice patterns in knowledge-based companies specialising in information and communication technology (ICT) in Iran in May and June 2020.Design/methodology/approachThis study is a qualitative grounded theory research. We collected the data from a target sample of 15 experts in knowledge-based ICT companies using in-depth semi-structured interviews. Since all the participants had practised the employee voice process, they were regarded as useful data sources. Data analysis was also performed using three-step coding (open, axial and selective) by Atlas T8, which eventually led to identifying 14 components and 38 selected codes. We placed identified components in a paradigm model, including Personality Characteristics, Job Factors, Economic Factors, Cultural Factors, Organisational Policies, Organisational Structure, Climate Of Voice in the Organisation, Management Factors, Emotional Events, Communications and Networking, Contrast and Conflict and, etc. Then, the voice pattern of the knowledge staff was drawn.FindingsThe results showed that constructive knowledge voice influences the recognition of environmental opportunities and, additionally, it helps the competitive advantages among the employees. By forming the concept of knowledge staff voice, it can be concluded that paying attention to knowledge staff voice leads to presenting creative solutions to do affairs in critical situations. The presentation of these solutions by knowledge workers results in the acceptance of environmental changes, recognition and exploitation of new chances and ideas, and sharing experiences in Iranian knowledge-based companies.Practical implicationsStrengthening and expanding the voice of employees in knowledge-oriented companies can pave the way to growth and development towards a higher future that prevents the waste of tangible and intangible assets.Originality/valueCompanies' ability to engage in knowledge workers is a vital factor in human resource management and strategic management. However, the employee voice has not been involved integrally in the context of corporate.

Achieving Human Resource Management Sustainability in Universities

The sustainability of human resource management (HRM) is the basis for an organization’s future growth and success. This study aims to investigate achieving HRM sustainability in universities. We use a quantitative research method design to investigate the factors that affect HRM sustainability at universities. The study was conducted during the spring and summer of 2020 at Iranian state universities. As the study’s statistical population included 2543 employees, a sample size of 334 employees was calculated using the Cochran formula. A questionnaire with 32 statements based on a 5-point Likert scale was used to collect the data, which were analyzed using PLS3 software. The findings show that human resource practices, social factors, psychological factors, employer branding, and economic factors have positive and significant effects on HRM sustainability at universities. Findings indicate that it is essential to consider the implementation of adequate HRM practices and related socio-economic and psychological supports for HRM sustainability in universities that can lead to the competitiveness of the higher education institutions such as universities.

Relationship Model between Human Resource Management Activities and Performance Based on LMBP Algorithm

The research on the relationship between human resource management activities and performance is an important topic of enterprise human resource management research. There are some errors between the relationship between human resource management activities and performance and the real situation, so it is impossible to accurately predict the performance fluctuation. Therefore, the relationship model between human resource management activities and performance based on the LMBP algorithm is constructed. Using the Levenberg–Marquardt (LM) algorithm and BP (back-propagation) neural network algorithm to establish a new LMBP algorithm, control the convergence of the new algorithm, optimize the accuracy of the algorithm, and then apply the LMBP algorithm to predict the risk of performance fluctuation under human resource management activities of enterprises, the indicators of human resource management activities of enterprises are determined, to complete the mining of enterprise performance data, the grey correlation analysis is combined, and the relationship model between human resource management activities and performance is built. The experimental samples are selected from CSMAR database, and the simulation experiment is designed. Using different algorithms to forecast the fluctuation of enterprise performance, the experimental results show that the LMBP algorithm can more accurately reflect the relationship between enterprise HRM and performance.

Inclusive human resource management in freelancers' employment relationships: The role of organizational needs and freelancers' psychological contracts

Student leadership programme: igniting the young minds.

Learning outcomes This case will help students to understand the following: Develop a basic understanding of competency building processes. Learn about the mentoring process and its application in leadership development. Develop awareness about the methodology for assessment of the effectiveness of training. Case overview/synopsis Dr A. R. K. Pillai founded the Indian Leprosy Foundation in 1970 in response to the national call by late Mrs Indira Gandhi, prime minister of India, to the public-spirited people to take up leprosy eradication. It collaborated with international agencies to reduce leprosy drastically in India from four million, in 1982 to around a hundred thousand cases in 2006. In 2006, the Indian Leprosy Foundation was renamed as Indian Development Foundation (IDF) as the trustees decided to expand the work of IDF in the areas of health, children’s education and women’s empowerment. Dr Narayan Iyer, Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of IDF initiated a leadership development intervention called the Students’ leadership programme (SLP) for children in the age group of 12 to 14, from the urban poor households in 2014. It was a structured mentoring programme spanning over three months in collaboration with the schools. It aimed at incubating skills in the areas of leadership, teamwork, personality, behavioural traits and provided career guidance. It had a humble beginning in 2014 with a coverage of 50 students. Initially, IDF welcomed executives from the corporate sector as mentors. As there was a need to rapidly expand the scope of SLP to the other cities of India, IDF tied up with the graduate colleges and invited the students to be the mentors. The other objective behind this move was to create social awareness among the students from more affluent strata of society. IDF was able to dramatically increase the participation of the students through SLP by approximately up to 100,000 by 2020. However, rapid progress threw up multiple challenges. The teachers complained about the non-availability of the students for regular classes to teach the syllabus as the students were busy with SLP. The schools forced IDF to shorten the duration of SLP to two months. Also, many undergraduate mentors were unable to coach the participants due to lack of maturity and found wanting to strike a rapport with them. There was a shortage of corporate executives who volunteered for the mentoring, due to work pressures. Dr Narayan, CEO & National Coordinator and Ms Mallika Ramchandran, the project head of SLP at IDF, were worried about the desired impact of SLP on the participants and its sustainability due to these challenges. So, with the support of Dr Narayan, she initiated a detailed survey to assess the ground-level impact of SLP. The objective was to get clarity about what was working for SLP and what aspects needed to improve, to make the programme more effective. Overall feedback from the survey was very positive. The mothers had seen very positive changes in the participants’ behaviour post-SLP. The teachers had specific concerns about the effectiveness of undergraduate mentors. The need for a refresher course to inculcate ethical behaviour and the inadequacy of the two-month duration of the SLP to reinforce values were highlighted. Respondents also voiced the requirement to build responsible citizenship behaviours among the participants. Mallika was all for preparing a model to further enhance the effectiveness of SLP. Dr Narayan and Mallika embraced the challenge and they were raring to go to develop SLP as a cutting-edge leadership programme and to take it to new heights. Complexity academic level This case can be used in courses on human resource management in postgraduate and graduate management programmes. It can also be used in the general and development management courses and during executive education programmes to teach methodologies for evaluating the effectiveness of the training interventions, with emphasis on the voluntary sector. Supplementary materials Teaching notes are available for educators only. Subject code CSS 6: Human Resource Management.

Sustainable human resource management: six defining characteristics

Socially responsible human resource management and employee ethical voice: roles of employee ethical self‐efficacy and organizational identification, feasibility of implementing the human resource payroll management system based on cloud computing.

PurposeThe present study is descriptive research in terms of purpose, descriptive analysis in terms of nature and cross-sectional research in terms of time. The study’s statistical population includes all employees and managers of the China City Organization selected as sample members using random sampling method and Krejcie table of 242 people. The questionnaire was modified and revised based on the goals, tasks and mission of the target organization to collect information. In data analysis, due to the normality of data distribution, the structural equation modeling method is used to evaluate the causal model, reliability and validity of the measurement model. Evaluation and validation of the model are done through the structural equation model. Questionnaire-based model and data are analyzed using Smart PLS 3.0. The main purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of implementing the human resource payroll management system based on cloud computing technology.Design/methodology/approachNew technologies require innovative approaches for creating valuable opportunities in an organization to integrate the physical flows of goods and services and financial information. Today, cloud computing is an emerging mechanism for high-level computing as a storage system. It is used to connect to network hosts, infrastructure and applications and provide reliable services. Due to advances in this field, cloud computing is used to perform operations related to human resources. The role, importance and application of cloud computing in human resource management, such as reducing the cost of hardware and information software in hiring, job planning, employee selection, employee socialization, payroll, employee performance appraisal, rewards, etc., is raised. This way, human resource management teams can easily view resumes, sort candidates and observe and analyze their performance. Cloud computing is effective in implementing human resource payroll management systems. Therefore, the primary purpose of this study is to assess the feasibility of implementing the human resource payroll management system based on cloud computing technology.FindingsTesting the research hypotheses shows that the dimension desirability of ability and acceptance is provided in dimensions related to the minimum conditions required to implement cloud computing technology in the organization. For this reason, the feasibility of implementing the systems based on cloud computing in companies must be considered.Research limitations/implicationsThis study also has some limitations that need to be considered in evaluating the results. The study is limited to one region. It cannot be assured that the factors examined in other areas are effective. The research design for this study is a cross-sectional study. It represents the static relationship between the variables. Since cross-sectional data from variable relationships are taken at a single point in time, they are collected in other periods. As a proposal, future researchers intend to investigate the impact of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems based on cloud computing.Practical implicationsThe research also includes companies, departments and individuals associated with systems based on cloud computing.Originality/valueIn this paper, the feasibility of implementing the human resource payroll management system based on cloud computing is pointed out, and the approach to resolve the problem is applied to a practical example. The presented model in this article provides a complete framework to investigate the feasibility of implementing the human resource payroll management system based on cloud computing.

Export Citation Format

Share document.

MCQs Capsule Course - Target JRF 2024 Paper 2 Management

NTA-UGC-NET & SET Exams

Ashima Negi

Started on jun 6.

Jun 6 - Jun 15, 2024

0 practices

0 questions by educators

Demo classes

Watch free classes by the educators of this batch

Previous Year Question Papers - Management

Understanding Human Resource Management - The PYQ Way.!

Types Of Research Methods - MCQs

Understanding Quantitative Techniques With MCQs

Jun 6 - jun 15, managerial economics, general management, business ethics.

Lesson 1  •  Jun 6  •  1h

Organisational Behaviour, Basics Of Human Resources Management

Lesson 2  •  Jun 7  •  56m

Human Resources Management, Industrial Relations, HR Laws

Lesson 3  •  5:00 AM

Accounting And Cost Accounting, Financial Statements & Ratios

Lesson 4  •  5:00 AM

Doubt Session

Lesson 5  •  5:00 AM

Financial Management Part I

Lesson 6  •  5:00 AM

Financial Management Part II And Strategic Management

Lesson 7  •  5:00 AM

Marketing Management, Brand Management, Services Marketing, Consumer Behaviour, Logistics

Lesson 8  •  5:00 AM

Probability, Statistics, Research, Quality Management, Production Management, Operations Research

Lesson 9  •  5:00 AM

International Business, IT, Entrepreneurship And Doubt Solving Session

Lesson 10  •  5:00 AM