hypothesis tests excel

Excel Tutorial: How To Test Hypothesis In Excel

Introduction.

Hypothesis testing is a crucial part of data analysis, helping us make informed decisions based on statistical evidence. It allows us to determine if there is enough evidence to support or reject a claim about a population parameter. In this Excel tutorial, we will delve into the process of testing hypothesis in Excel , providing you with the knowledge and skills to confidently analyze and draw conclusions from your data.

So why is hypothesis testing so important? Well, it helps us make sense of the overwhelming amount of data we encounter in our professional and personal lives. Whether we are trying to understand consumer behavior, assess the effectiveness of a new product, or evaluate the impact of a marketing campaign, hypothesis testing allows us to make informed decisions and draw reliable conclusions.

Key Takeaways

• Hypothesis testing is essential for making informed decisions based on statistical evidence.
• Understanding null and alternative hypotheses, as well as type I and type II errors, is crucial in hypothesis testing.
• Setting up and organizing data accurately in Excel is necessary for conducting hypothesis tests.
• Interpreting the results of a hypothesis test, including determining the p-value and significance level, is important for drawing reliable conclusions.
• Avoiding common mistakes such as misinterpreting results and using the wrong test for the data is vital in hypothesis testing.

Understanding hypothesis testing

Hypothesis testing is a crucial concept in statistics that allows us to make inferences about a population based on a sample. In the context of Excel, understanding hypothesis testing is essential for data analysis and decision-making.

In hypothesis testing, the null hypothesis ( H0 ) is a statement that there is no effect or no difference in the population parameter. It is typically the hypothesis that researchers aim to refute. On the other hand, the alternative hypothesis ( Ha ) is a statement that there is an effect or a difference in the population parameter. It represents what the researchers are trying to prove.

In hypothesis testing, there are two types of errors that can occur. A Type I error occurs when the null hypothesis is rejected when it is actually true. This is also known as a false positive. A Type II error occurs when the null hypothesis is not rejected when it is actually false. This is also known as a false negative.

The significance level, often denoted as α , is the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true. In hypothesis testing, choosing the appropriate significance level is crucial as it determines the likelihood of making a Type I error. Commonly used significance levels include 0.05, 0.01, and 0.10.

Setting up the data in Excel

When conducting hypothesis testing in Excel, it is crucial to properly set up your data to ensure accurate results. Here are the key steps to follow:

The first step in testing a hypothesis in Excel is to input your data into the spreadsheet. This may include numerical values, categorical data, or any other relevant information for your analysis.

Once the data is inputted, it is important to organize it in a way that is conducive to hypothesis testing. This may involve structuring the data into relevant columns and rows, or creating separate sheets for different variables.

Prior to conducting hypothesis testing, it is essential to ensure that the data is accurate and complete. This may involve checking for any missing or erroneous values, as well as verifying the overall integrity of the dataset.

• Input all relevant data into the Excel spreadsheet.
• Organize the data in a manner that facilitates hypothesis testing.
• Verify the accuracy and completeness of the data before proceeding with hypothesis testing.

Performing a hypothesis test in Excel

When it comes to testing hypotheses in Excel, there are a few key steps to follow to ensure accurate and reliable results. Here, we'll delve into the process of performing a hypothesis test in Excel, covering everything from selecting the appropriate test for the data to interpreting the test results.

Before diving into the hypothesis testing process, it's crucial to determine the appropriate test for the data at hand. This involves understanding the nature of the data and the specific hypothesis being tested. Whether it's a t-test, chi-squared test, ANOVA, or another statistical test, choosing the right test is essential for obtaining meaningful results.

Excel offers a range of built-in functions that make hypothesis testing relatively straightforward. Functions like T.TEST, CHISQ.TEST, and ANOVA help streamline the process, allowing users to input their data and quickly obtain test statistics and p-values. Understanding how to utilize these functions is key to executing hypothesis tests accurately.

Once the hypothesis test has been run in Excel, it's important to carefully interpret the results. This involves analyzing the test statistic, p-value, and any relevant confidence intervals to determine whether the data provides enough evidence to support or reject the null hypothesis. Excel's output can provide valuable insights into the significance of the findings, helping to draw meaningful conclusions from the hypothesis test.

Interpreting the results

After conducting a hypothesis test in Excel, it is important to carefully interpret the results to draw meaningful conclusions.

Understanding the p-value

The p-value is a crucial indicator of the strength of evidence against the null hypothesis. A low p-value (typically less than 0.05) suggests that the results are statistically significant, and the null hypothesis can be rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis.

Significance level

The significance level, often denoted as alpha (α), is the threshold at which the p-value is considered significant. Commonly used significance levels include 0.05 and 0.01.

Rejecting or failing to reject the null hypothesis

Based on the obtained p-value and significance level, it is possible to determine whether the null hypothesis should be rejected or retained. If the p-value is less than the significance level, the null hypothesis is typically rejected in favor of the alternative hypothesis.

Considering the practical significance

In addition to statistical significance, it is important to consider the practical implications of the results. Even if a hypothesis is statistically significant, it may not have meaningful real-world impact.

Interpreting the findings in context

It is essential to discuss the implications of the hypothesis test within the specific context of the research or analysis. This involves considering the broader implications and potential applications of the results.

Considering limitations and alternative explanations

Discussing the potential limitations of the hypothesis test and considering alternative explanations for the results can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the findings.

Common mistakes to avoid

When conducting hypothesis testing in Excel, it's important to be aware of common mistakes that can lead to inaccurate results. Here are some key pitfalls to watch out for:

Misinterpreting the results of hypothesis tests is a common mistake that can lead to faulty conclusions. It's important to thoroughly understand the output of the test and consider the implications of the results before drawing any conclusions.

Using the wrong hypothesis test for the type of data being analyzed can lead to incorrect results. It's essential to select the appropriate test based on the nature of the data and the research question being addressed.

Failing to check for data integrity before conducting hypothesis tests can result in unreliable results. It's crucial to ensure that the data being analyzed is accurate and free from errors or anomalies that could impact the validity of the test.

Recap: Hypothesis testing is a crucial step in data analysis as it allows us to make informed decisions based on the evidence provided by the data.

Encouragement: I highly encourage you to apply the tutorial on hypothesis testing in Excel to your own data analysis projects. It's a valuable skill that can greatly enhance the quality and reliability of your conclusions.

Final Thoughts: The significance of hypothesis testing in Excel cannot be understated. It is a powerful tool that enables us to make conclusions about the population based on sample data, ultimately leading to more accurate and meaningful insights.

Immediate Download

MAC & PC Compatible

Free Email Support

Related aticles

The Benefits of Excel Dashboards for Data Analysts

Unlock the Power of Real-Time Data Visualization with Excel Dashboards

Unlocking the Potential of Excel's Data Dashboard

Unleashing the Benefits of a Dashboard with Maximum Impact in Excel

Exploring Data Easily and Securely: Essential Features for Excel Dashboards

Unlock the Benefits of Real-Time Dashboard Updates in Excel

Unleashing the Power of Excel Dashboards

Understanding the Benefits and Challenges of Excel Dashboard Design and Development

Leverage Your Data with Excel Dashboards

Crafting the Perfect Dashboard for Excel

An Introduction to Excel Dashboards

How to Create an Effective Excel Dashboard

• Choosing a selection results in a full page refresh.

The Complete Guide: Hypothesis Testing in Excel

In statistics, a hypothesis test is used to test some assumption about a population parameter .

There are many different types of hypothesis tests you can perform depending on the type of data you’re working with and the goal of your analysis.

This tutorial explains how to perform the following types of hypothesis tests in Excel:

• One sample t-test
• Two sample t-test
• Paired samples t-test
• One proportion z-test
• Two proportion z-test

Let’s jump in!

Example 1: One Sample t-test in Excel

A one sample t-test is used to test whether or not the mean of a population is equal to some value.

For example, suppose a botanist wants to know if the mean height of a certain species of plant is equal to 15 inches.

To test this, she collects a random sample of 12 plants and records each of their heights in inches.

She would write the hypotheses for this particular one sample t-test as follows:

• H 0 :  µ = 15
• H A :  µ ≠15

Refer to this tutorial for a step-by-step explanation of how to perform this hypothesis test in Excel.

Example 2: Two Sample t-test in Excel

A two sample t-test is used to test whether or not the means of two populations are equal.

For example, suppose researchers want to know whether or not two different species of plants have the same mean height.

To test this, they collect a random sample of 20 plants from each species and measure their heights.

The researchers would write the hypotheses for this particular two sample t-test as follows:

• H 0 :  µ 1 = µ 2
• H A :  µ 1 ≠ µ 2

Example 3: Paired Samples t-test in Excel

A paired samples t-test is used to compare the means of two samples when each observation in one sample can be paired with an observation in the other sample.

For example, suppose we want to know whether a certain study program significantly impacts student performance on a particular exam.

To test this, we have 20 students in a class take a pre-test. Then, we have each of the students participate in the study program for two weeks. Then, the students retake a post-test of similar difficulty.

We would write the hypotheses for this particular two sample t-test as follows:

• H 0 :  µ pre = µ post
• H A :  µ pre ≠ µ post

Example 4: One Proportion z-test in Excel

A  one proportion z-test  is used to compare an observed proportion to a theoretical one.

For example, suppose a phone company claims that 90% of its customers are satisfied with their service.

To test this claim, an independent researcher gathered a simple random sample of 200 customers and asked them if they are satisfied with their service.

• H 0 : p = 0.90
• H A : p ≠ 0.90

Example 5: Two Proportion z-test in Excel

A two proportion z-test is used to test for a difference between two population proportions.

For example, suppose a s uperintendent of a school district claims that the percentage of students who prefer chocolate milk over regular milk in school cafeterias is the same for school 1 and school 2.

To test this claim, an independent researcher obtains a simple random sample of 100 students from each school and surveys them about their preferences.

• H 0 : p 1 = p 2
• H A : p 1  ≠ p 2

How to Change Axis Scales in Google Sheets Plots

Statistics vs. analytics: what’s the difference, related posts, how to create a stem-and-leaf plot in spss, how to create a correlation matrix in spss, excel: how to use if function with text..., excel: how to use greater than or equal..., excel: how to use if function with multiple..., how to convert date of birth to age..., excel: how to highlight entire row based on..., how to add target line to graph in..., excel: how to use if function with negative..., how to extract number from string in pandas.

Hypothesis Test in Excel for the Population Mean (Large Sample)

Microsoft Excel for statistics > Hypothesis Test in Excel #1

Note : This article covers z-tests in Excel. If you have a small sample (under 30), or don’t know the population standard deviation , run a T Test in Excel instead.

Hypothesis Test in Excel: Overview

Hypothesis Test in Excel: Two Sample for Means

Hypothesis test in excel: manual steps.

Step 1: Type your data into a single column in Excel. For example, type your data into cells A1:A40.

Step 2: Click the “Data” tab and then click “Data Analysis.” If you don’t see the Data Analysis button then you may need to load the Data Analysis Toolpak .

Step 3: Click “ Descriptive Statistics “ and then click “OK.” When the Descriptive Statistics dialog box opens, click “Summary Statistics” and then type the location for a cell where you want your result to appear. For example, type”B1.”

Step 4: Click “OK. ” A variety of descriptive statistics, like the median and mode , will appear starting in cell B1.

Step 5: Find the cells that have the mean and the standard error results in it. If you typed in cell B1 in Step 3, your mean will be in cell C3 and your standard error will be in cell C4. Take a note of those cell locations.

Step 6: Type the following formula into cell D1 (assuming your mean is in cell C3 and your SE is in cell C4 — if they are not, you’ll need to adjust the formula): (C3-0)/C4

Change the “zero” to reflect the mean in your null hypothesis . For example, if your null hypothesis states that the mean is $7 per hour, then change the 0 to “7.”

Step 7: Press “Enter” to get the value of the test statistic. Compare the value to the accepted value for your mean from the z-table*. If the test statistic falls into the accepted range, then you will fail to reject the null hypothesis .

Subscribe to our YouTube channel for more Microsoft Excel for Statistics help and tips!

Comments are closed.

• Write My Statistics Paper
• Jamovi Assignment Help
• Business Statistics Assignment Help
• RapidMiner Assignment Help
• Econometric Software Assignment Help
• Econometrics Assignment Help
• Game Theory Assignment Help
• Take My Statistics Exam
• Statistics Assignment Helper
• Statistics Research Paper Assignment Help
• Do My Statistics Assignment
• Pay Someone to Do My Statistics Assignment
• Professional Statistics Assignment Writers
• Need Help with My Statistics Assignment
• Hire Someone to Do My Statistics Assignment
• Statistics Assignment Experts
• Statistics Midterm Assignment Help
• Statistics Capstone Project Help
• Urgent Statistics Assignment Help
• Take My Statistics Quiz
• Professional Statistics Assignment Help
• Statistics Assignment Writers
• Best Statistics Assignment Help
• Affordable Statistics Assignment Help
• Final Year Statistics Project Help
• Statistics Coursework Help
• Reliable Statistics Assignment Help
• Take My Statistics Test
• Custom Statistics Assignment Help
• SPSS Assignment Help
• STATA Assignment Help
• Statistix Assignment Help
• Calculus Assignment Help
• Statistical Hypothesis Formulation Assignment Help
• LabVIEW Assignment Help
• LISREL Assignment Help
• Minitab Assignment Help
• Analytica Software Assignment Help
• Statistica Assignment Help
• Design Expert Assignment Help
• Orange Assignment Help
• KNIME Assignment Help
• WinBUGS Assignment Help
• SAS Assignment Help
• Excel Assignment Help
• JASP Assignment Help
• JMP Assignment Help
• Alteryx Assignment Help
• Statistical Software Assignment Help
• GRETL Assignment Help
• Apache Hadoop Assignment Help
• XLSTAT Assignment Help
• Linear Algebra Assignment Help
• Data Analysis Assignment Help
• Finance Assignment Help
• ANOVA Assignment Help
• Black Scholes Assignment Help
• Experimental Design Assignment Help
• CNN (Convolutional Neural Network) Assignment Help
• Statistical Tests and Measures Assignment Help
• Multiple Linear Regression Assignment Help
• Correlation Analysis Assignment Help
• Data Classification Assignment Help
• Decision Making Assignment Help
• 2D Geometry Assignment Help
• Distribution Theory Assignment Help
• Decision Theory Assignment Help
• Data Manipulation Assignment Help
• Binomial Distributions Assignment Help
• Linear Regression Assignment Help
• Statistical Inference Assignment Help
• Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) Assignment Help
• Numerical Methods Assignment Help
• Markov Processes Assignment Help
• Non-Parametric Tests Assignment Help
• Multivariate Statistics Assignment Help
• Data Flow Diagram Assignment Help
• Bivariate Normal Distribution Assignment Help
• Matrix Operations Assignment Help
• CFA Assignment Help
• Mathematical Methods Assignment Help
• Probability Assignment Help
• Kalman Filter Assignment Help
• Kruskal-Wallis Test Assignment Help
• Stochastic Processes Assignment Help
• Chi-Square Test Assignment Help
• Six Sigma Assignment Help
• Hypothesis Testing Assignment Help
• GAUSS Assignment Help
• GARCH Models Assignment Help
• Simple Random Sampling Assignment Help
• GEE Models Assignment Help
• Principal Component Analysis Assignment Help
• Multicollinearity Assignment Help
• Linear Discriminant Assignment Help
• Logistic Regression Assignment Help
• Survival Analysis Assignment Help
• Nonparametric Statistics Assignment Help
• Poisson Process Assignment Help
• Cluster Analysis Assignment Help
• ARIMA Models Assignment Help
• Measures of central tendency
• Time Series Analysis Assignment Help
• Factor Analysis Assignment Help
• Regression Analysis Assignment Help
• Survey Methodology Assignment Help
• Statistical Modeling Assignment Help
• Survey Design Assignment Help
• Linear Programming Assignment Help
• Confidence Interval Assignment Help
• Quantitative Methods Assignment Help
• Mastering Hypothesis Testing in Excel: A Comprehensive Step-by-Step Tutorial for Student Success

Submit Your Excel Assignment

Get FREE Quote

The Basics of Hypothesis Testing

Types of hypothesis tests, organizing your data, data entry and formatting, choosing the right test, inputting data and formulas, understanding p-values and significance levels, making informed conclusions, using data analysis toolpak.

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical method that plays a pivotal role in drawing meaningful conclusions from data samples about broader populations. Its application spans various fields, from finance to healthcare, as researchers seek evidence to support or reject hypotheses. However, the complexity of hypothesis testing can be overwhelming for students, often leading to challenges in application and interpretation. Fortunately, there exists a powerful ally in the form of Microsoft Excel – a widely used spreadsheet program that can streamline the process and make hypothesis testing more approachable, providing valuable assistance with your Excel assignment.

In this comprehensive tutorial, we aim to demystify the intricacies of hypothesis testing using Excel, providing students with a step-by-step guide that transforms statistical theory into practical application. Excel's accessibility and versatility make it an ideal platform for students to reinforce their understanding of hypothesis-testing concepts and gain hands-on experience in analyzing real-world data. Whether you're navigating the nuances of null and alternative hypotheses or grappling with the intricacies of t-tests and ANOVA, Excel serves as a reliable companion, offering assistance with your Excel assignment and ensuring a smoother learning curve.

By the end of this tutorial, students will not only have a grasp of the theoretical underpinnings of hypothesis testing but will also possess the practical skills to navigate Excel confidently for statistical analysis. This step-by-step guide aims to empower students, ensuring that hypothesis testing assignments are approached with confidence and proficiency, ultimately contributing to a deeper understanding of statistical methodologies. Excel, as your trusted ally, stands ready to provide the assistance you need in conquering the challenges of hypothesis testing within the realm of your assignments.

Understanding Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing serves as the cornerstone of statistical inference, providing researchers with a systematic approach to derive meaningful insights from sample data. In this comprehensive section, we will embark on an exploration of the fundamental principles that underlie hypothesis testing, laying the groundwork for its application within the versatile framework of Microsoft Excel.

At its core, hypothesis testing involves the formulation of two key statements: the null hypothesis (H0) and the alternative hypothesis (H1). The null hypothesis represents a stance of no effect or no difference in the population, acting as the default assumption to be tested. On the other hand, the alternative hypothesis posits the existence of a significant effect or difference. This dichotomy sets the stage for statistical analysis, allowing researchers to evaluate the evidence provided by the sample data.

Understanding these fundamental concepts is paramount as they form the basis for hypothesis testing using Excel. Without a solid grasp of the null and alternative hypotheses, the subsequent steps in the analysis process may lack clarity and direction. Excel's effectiveness in hypothesis testing hinges on the user's ability to translate these theoretical constructs into actionable steps within the spreadsheet.

In essence, this section serves as a crucial foundation, equipping you with the essential knowledge needed to navigate the intricacies of hypothesis testing in the subsequent stages of our tutorial. With a clear understanding of these basic principles, you'll be well-prepared to leverage Excel's capabilities for hypothesis testing, transforming theoretical concepts into practical analytical insights.

Before diving into Excel, let's take a moment to revisit the fundamental principles of hypothesis testing. At its core, hypothesis testing involves the formulation of two key hypotheses: the null hypothesis (H0) and the alternative hypothesis (H1). The null hypothesis serves as a statement asserting no effect or no difference within the population, acting as the status quo or default assumption. On the other hand, the alternative hypothesis proposes the existence of a specific effect or difference in the population. This essential dichotomy lays the groundwork for statistical analysis, allowing researchers to assess evidence and draw meaningful conclusions from sample data. Understanding this foundational concept is crucial as we embark on utilizing Excel for hypothesis testing, providing a solid conceptual basis for the practical steps that follow.

In the realm of hypothesis testing, selecting the appropriate test is pivotal for accurate and meaningful results. Various tests cater to different data types and research questions. One commonly employed test is the t-test, particularly useful for comparing means between two groups. Chi-square tests, on the other hand, are employed when dealing with categorical data, assessing the independence or association between variables. For scenarios involving multiple groups, the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test becomes indispensable, allowing for the comparison of means across more than two groups.

Understanding the nuances of these tests is essential for a successful hypothesis test. It involves considering the nature of your data, whether it's continuous or categorical, and the specifics of your research question. Mastery of these distinctions empowers researchers and students alike to make informed decisions when embarking on hypothesis testing endeavors, ensuring the precision and relevance of their statistical analyses.

Setting Up Your Excel Spreadsheet

Setting up your Excel spreadsheet is a critical preliminary step before delving into the intricacies of hypothesis testing. A well-organized spreadsheet, akin to a canvas for statistical analysis, establishes the foundation for accurate and efficient examination of your data. This involves structuring your data with clarity, assigning clear labels to variables, and making the most of Excel's formatting features. By meticulously organizing your spreadsheet, you pave the way for a seamless transition into the practical application of hypothesis testing. This initial preparation not only enhances the accuracy of your analysis but also facilitates a more intuitive and streamlined experience as you progress through the subsequent stages of hypothesis testing in Excel. A thoughtful approach to spreadsheet setup is, therefore, an investment in the success and precision of your statistical endeavors.

Organizing your data efficiently is paramount when embarking on hypothesis testing using Excel. Begin by establishing a well-structured spreadsheet, allocating labeled columns and rows for clarity. Clearly differentiate between your sample data, hypothesized population parameters, and any calculated statistics. Ensure that each data point is accurately placed, and consider using distinct formatting or color-coding to enhance visual clarity. This meticulous organization not only facilitates a systematic approach but also minimizes the likelihood of errors during data entry and analysis. Remember that a well-organized spreadsheet serves as the foundation for the entire hypothesis testing process, allowing for smoother execution of subsequent steps. As you develop this habit, you'll find that the initial investment of time in data organization pays off manifold in the accuracy and efficiency of your Excel-based hypothesis testing assignments.

Data entry and formatting are critical components of a successful hypothesis testing assignment in Excel, comprising the foundation for accurate analysis. Accurate data entry is paramount; even a small mistake can lead to skewed results. Excel offers various formatting features to enhance the clarity of your spreadsheet, such as cell borders, shading, and font styles. Consider using different colors to distinguish variables or group related data, making it visually intuitive for both yourself and anyone reviewing your work. This not only reduces the likelihood of errors but also improves the overall readability of your spreadsheet. Moreover, organizing your data with clear labels and headers ensures that you can quickly locate and reference information during the analysis process. By dedicating attention to data entry precision and thoughtful formatting, you set the stage for a smooth and error-free hypothesis testing experience in Excel.

Performing a T-Test in Excel

Performing a t-test in Excel is a crucial skill for students tackling statistical assignments. This step is where theory meets practice, and the application of Excel's functions makes the process more accessible. Whether it's a one-sample t-test, two-sample paired t-test, or two-sample independent t-test, each variant requires specific steps within Excel. We'll guide you through the process, breaking down each step to ensure a comprehensive understanding. As you navigate through Excel's interface, you'll witness how built-in functions automate intricate calculations, saving you time and reducing the likelihood of errors. This practical aspect of hypothesis testing not only reinforces your understanding but also equips you with a valuable tool for future data analysis tasks. So, let's dive into the practical intricacies of performing t-tests in Excel and unlock the full potential of this versatile spreadsheet software.

Choosing the right test in Excel is a critical step in conducting hypothesis testing. Excel offers a range of tools, but when it comes to comparing means, the t-test is frequently the preferred choice. The type of t-test you select depends on the nature of your hypothesis and the design of your study. For instance, a one-sample t-test is suitable when comparing a sample mean to a known population mean, while a two-sample paired t-test is ideal for dependent samples, such as pre-test and post-test measurements. On the other hand, a two-sample independent t-test is used when dealing with independent groups. Carefully evaluating the structure of your data and the specifics of your research question will guide you in making an informed decision on which t-test to employ, ensuring the accuracy and relevance of your hypothesis test results.

When it comes to inputting data and formulas for hypothesis testing in Excel, precision is paramount. After selecting the relevant t-test based on your research question, navigate to the designated cells in your spreadsheet to input the data. Excel simplifies the calculation process by providing predefined formulas for each type of t-test. These formulas automatically compute the test statistic and p-value, saving you from manual calculations. However, despite the convenience, it's crucial to exercise caution. Double-check your entries for accuracy and verify that the formulas are applied correctly. Mistakes in data input or formula application can lead to erroneous results, potentially affecting the validity of your hypothesis test. Taking the time to ensure accuracy at this stage is an investment in the reliability of your analysis, ultimately contributing to the credibility of your assignment.

Interpreting Results and Drawing Conclusions

Obtaining results is only part of the journey. Here, we focus on interpreting p-values, understanding significance levels, and drawing meaningful conclusions from your hypothesis test outcomes. Excel not only facilitates the analysis but also aids in presenting your findings in a clear and concise manner.

Once the hypothesis test in Excel is complete, the attention shifts to the interpretation of results. The p-value, a crucial metric, indicates the probability of obtaining the observed results if the null hypothesis is true. A low p-value (typically below 0.05) suggests evidence against the null hypothesis, allowing you to reject it in favor of the alternative. Understanding significance levels is vital; they represent the threshold for deeming results statistically significant.

Excel's capabilities extend beyond computation; it assists in visually representing data trends. Utilizing charts and graphs, you can effectively communicate your findings, enhancing the overall impact of your hypothesis testing assignment. In this section, we delve into these intricacies, guiding you on not just conducting tests but extracting meaningful insights from them.

After completing the hypothesis test in Excel, the pivotal step is interpreting the obtained p-value. The p-value represents the probability of observing the data, or more extreme data, under the assumption that the null hypothesis is true. This probability is then compared to the predetermined significance level, often set at 0.05. If the p-value is less than the significance level, typically denoted as α, it suggests that the observed results are statistically significant. In other words, the likelihood of obtaining such results by random chance is low, providing evidence to reject the null hypothesis. Researchers commonly use the 0.05 threshold, but it's essential to note that the choice of significance level depends on the study's context and the acceptable level of risk. Understanding this comparison between p-values and significance levels is fundamental to drawing valid conclusions from hypothesis testing in Excel, ensuring robust and reliable statistical analyses.

With the statistical results at your disposal, the critical step is to draw well-informed conclusions based on your hypothesis test. Begin by explicitly stating whether you reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis. This decision hinges on comparing the obtained p-value to the predetermined significance level, often set at 0.05. If the p-value is less than 0.05, it suggests statistical significance, prompting the rejection of the null hypothesis.

In interpreting the findings, delve into the broader context of your research question. Consider the practical implications of your results and how they contribute to the existing body of knowledge. Excel's data visualization features can be instrumental at this stage, allowing you to create insightful graphs or charts that visually represent the patterns or differences uncovered during the hypothesis test. Effectively presenting your results enhances the clarity of your conclusions, making them more accessible to your audience and strengthening the overall impact of your assignment.

Tips and Tricks for Efficient Hypothesis Testing in Excel

To enhance your efficiency in hypothesis testing using Excel, we provide valuable tips and tricks. Learn how to leverage Excel's Data Analysis ToolPak for advanced statistical tools, and master time-saving shortcuts that streamline your workflow. These insights will not only make your assignments more manageable but also empower you to tackle more complex analyses in the future.

Efficiency is paramount when dealing with hypothesis testing assignments. Excel's Data Analysis ToolPak is a robust feature that extends the software's statistical capabilities. By enabling this tool, you gain access to a variety of advanced statistical functions, including regression analysis and analysis of variance (ANOVA). This can significantly broaden the scope of your analyses, allowing you to explore more intricate research questions.

In addition to leveraging advanced tools, mastering Excel shortcuts is a game-changer for expediting your workflow. Whether it's navigating between cells, copying formulas, or formatting data, these shortcuts save time and increase your overall productivity. Investing time in learning and incorporating these shortcuts into your routine can make a substantial difference in the efficiency and accuracy of your hypothesis testing assignments. As you become adept at using these tips and tricks, you'll not only complete your current assignments with ease but also lay the foundation for more sophisticated analyses in your academic and professional journey.

Excel's Data Analysis ToolPak, a robust add-on, significantly expands the statistical analysis capabilities within the software. To unlock its potential, begin by enabling the ToolPak through Excel's options menu. Once activated, a plethora of advanced analytical tools becomes accessible, making hypothesis testing more comprehensive and efficient.

Learning to navigate and utilize the Data Analysis ToolPak can be a game-changer for students tackling statistical assignments. It offers an array of functions, including regression analysis, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and correlation tests, complementing the basic features of Excel. This powerful extension allows users to perform complex statistical procedures without the need for intricate manual calculations.

By familiarizing yourself with the ToolPak's functionalities, you can elevate your hypothesis testing skills. The ability to conduct a wide range of statistical analyses directly within Excel enhances both accuracy and speed, crucial factors when working on assignments with tight deadlines. As you integrate the Data Analysis ToolPak into your Excel toolkit, you empower yourself to handle more sophisticated statistical challenges, providing a competitive edge in academic and professional settings.

In conclusion, Excel emerges as an invaluable ally, transforming the seemingly daunting task of hypothesis testing into a manageable and even empowering experience for students. This step-by-step tutorial provides a structured approach, guiding you through the process from spreadsheet setup to result interpretation. Meticulous organization of data, judicious test selection, and harnessing Excel's features are emphasized for a seamless workflow. With practice, navigating hypothesis testing in Excel becomes second nature, enhancing your statistical proficiency and overall academic performance. The mastery of these skills not only aids in current assignments but also lays a foundation for future analytical endeavors, proving Excel's enduring relevance as a versatile tool in the realm of statistical analysis and hypothesis testing. Remember, it's not just about completing assignments but developing a skill set that serves you well beyond the classroom environment.

How to Test Variances in Excel

By Jim Frost 7 Comments

Use a variances test to determine whether the variability of two groups differs. In this post, we’ll work through a two-sample variances test that Excel provides. Even if Excel isn’t your primary statistical software, this post provides an excellent introduction to variance tests. Excel refers to this analysis as F-Test Two-Sample for Variances.

In this post, I provide step-by-step instructions for using Excel to conduct a two-sample variance test and interpreting the statistical results. I also include links to supplementary information I’ve written.

Before proceeding, ensure that Excel’s Data Analysis ToolPak is installed for Excel. Look for Data Analysis as shown below.

If you don’t see Data Analysis, you’ll have to install that ToolPak. Learn how to install it in my post about using Excel to perform t-tests . It’s free!

F-test for Two-Sample Variances in Excel

In general, variances tests assess the variability of the data in multiple groups to determine whether they are different. Variance is a measure of variability that uses squared units, which makes it hard for us humans to interpret. However, various statistical procedures include variances in their calculations. The standard deviation is a more common measure of variability, and it is simply the square root of the variance. Standard deviations are much easier to interpret because they use the same units as the original data.

Analysts frequently use F-tests to assess the differences between group means in analysis of variance (ANOVA) . However, F-tests are very flexible tests that evaluate the ratio of two variances. By changing the variances in the numerator and denominator, analysts can use F-tests to assess a diverse array of properties, such as the overall statistical significance of a regression model to the differences between group means. For variance tests, we’ll use the F-test to determine whether two variances are different.

Excel can perform only two-sample variance tests, which assesses variances for precisely two groups. However, other types of tests can compare variability for more groups.

Typically, you perform this hypothesis test to determine whether two population variances are different. This form of the test uses independent samples. In other words, each group contains different people or items.

From Excel’s Data Analysis popup, choose F-test Two-Sample for Variances .

Related post : Measures of Variability

Hypotheses in Variances Tests

The standard two-tailed two-sample variance tests use the following hypotheses:

• Null : The two population variances are equal.
• Alternative : The two population variances are not equal.

If the p-value is less than your significance level (e.g., 0.05), you can reject the null hypothesis. The difference between the two variances is statistically significant. This condition indicates that your sample provides strong enough evidence to conclude that the variability in the two populations are different. In other words, their spreads differ. Hypothesis tests, like variance tests, allow you to use samples to draw conclusions about populations.

Unfortunately, Excel provides a p-value for only the one-tailed form of the variances test. One-tailed tests can detect differences between means in only one direction. For example, a one-tailed test might determine only whether Group A’s variability is greater than Group B’s variability. Two-tailed tests can detect differences in either direction—greater than or less than. There are additional drawbacks to using one-tailed tests. I wish Excel provided both one-tailed and two-tailed results as it does with two-sample t-tests.

Related posts : Hypothesis Testing Overview and One and Two-Tailed Hypothesis Tests

Performing the Two-Sample Variances Test in Excel

For this example, I’ll use data from my blog post about a Mythbusters’ Battle of the Sexes episode . In that episode, the Mythbusters evaluate whether men or women are better at parallel parking.

The Mythbusters have ten subjects per group and use a parking test that produces scores between 0 and 100. The mean difference between men and women is not statistically significant.

However, while testing the subjects, the hosts noticed that the women’s parallel parking skills appear to be more variable than the men’s abilities. The graph below shows how women have a broader range of scores than men.

While the spread of these two groups looks very different, let’s use Excel’s variances test to determine whether this difference is statistically significant.

To perform a two-sample variance test in Excel, arrange your data in two columns, as shown below. Download the CSV file that contains the data for this example: VariancesTest .

• In Excel, click Data Analysis on the Data tab.
• From the Data Analysis popup, choose F-Test Two-Sample for Variances .
• Under Input , select the ranges for both Variable 1 Range and Variable 2 Range .
• Check the Labels checkbox if you have meaningful variable names in row 1. This option makes the output easier to interpret. Ensure that you include the label row in step #3.
• Excel uses the default Alpha value of 0.05, which you usually won’t need to change. Alpha is also known as the significance level.

For this example, the popup should look like the following:

After Excel creates the statistical output, I autofit column A to display all of it.

Interpreting the Test Results

The output indicates that the variance for Males is 131.3778, and for Females it is 982.2778. The difference between these numerical measures of variances corresponds to the difference we observed in the graph. The p-value is the most important statistic. If you want to learn about the other statistics , read my posts about F (i.e., the F-value) , df (degrees of freedom) , and critical values .

For our results, we’ll use the P(F<=f) one-tail row, which is the p-value for the one-tailed form of the variances test. Because our p-value (0.003094) is less than the standard significance level of 0.05, we can reject the null hypothesis. Our sample data support the hypothesis that the population variances are different. Women are more variable at parallel parking than men.

What Excel’s Variances Test Does Not Include

Excel’s only variances test is the F-test. F-tests can assess only two groups and are susceptible to departures from normality . However, other two-sample tests are less sensitive to departures from normality, such as Bonett’s and Levene’s tests. Levene’s test is particularly suitable for small samples (>20) and skewed data.

If you have more than two groups, use Bartlett’s or Levene’s test to evaluate their variances. Bartlett’s test is more sensitive to the normality assumption than Levene’s test.

As I mentioned earlier, Excel, strangely, only offers the one-tailed test result, which is often inappropriate.

Finally, it would be nice if Excel converted the variances to standard deviations and displayed confidence intervals. The variances that Excel displays are not intuitive. Additionally, they are only the point estimates from the samples. Confidence intervals help you determine a range of values that the population parameter is like to fall within.

Share this:

Reader Interactions

May 10, 2021 at 9:38 pm

It appears that Excel 2016 calculates the F test for two tails.

April 19, 2021 at 2:22 pm

Thank you for your explanation of Excel’s F-test for equal variances. However, there is an issue with Excel’s calculation that I was recently made aware of by one of my students. If you note in your results table, the observed F-value (0.13) is smaller than the critical F-value (0.31), but the p-value is quite small (0.003).

Excel recommends that the group with the larger variance be selected as the first group (or first column) and the other group with smaller variance selected as the second column data. This would provide F-calculations that are more consistent with p-values.

April 19, 2021 at 3:40 pm

February 28, 2021 at 3:13 pm

Thank you for some fantastic books, introducing myself and others to the magical world of statistics!

I have a question that I hope you can help me with. The statistical software I use, do not have a function for Bonett Hypothesis test, why I thought I would create one. So far, I’ve done the calculations for the confidence interval and they are spot on (when I use the data you provide in your hypothesis book at page 238 and compare the Bonett confidence interval-result to my own).

However, I can’t seem to figure out how to calculate the p-value. I’ve found documentation at minitab.coms webpage, https://support.minitab.com/en-us/minitab/20/help-and-how-to/statistics/basic-statistics/how-to/1-variance/methods-and-formulas/methods-and-formulas/#hypothesis-test-for-the-chi-square-method , for how to calculate the p-value, but I’m still unsure how it is done, since the equation to solve for alpha contains inverse cumulative probability.

Can you help me out here?

Thanks in advance and thank you for some really good books!

November 24, 2019 at 1:23 am

I liked it very much

November 19, 2019 at 5:48 pm

Valuable informations

November 18, 2019 at 3:51 am

very interesting and important

Comments and Questions Cancel reply

Best Excel Tutorial

The largest Excel knowledge base ✅ The best place to learn Excel online ❤️

How to Test Hypothesis in Excel

In this Excel tutorial, you will learn how to test hypothesis in Excel application based on given data arrays. This is a testing that make it possible to test if two range are equal to one another.

Table of Contents

Hypothesis t-Test Testing using T.Test Excel function

To test t test hypotesis in Excel you can just use T.Test function.

The syntax of T.TEST Excel function:

• Array1: the first set of data to test
• Array2: the second set of data to test
• Tails: the number of tails where 1. is one-tailed distribution and 2 is for two tailed distribution
• Type: 1 is for paired, 2 for homoscedastic, 3 for heteroscedastic

This is the data set and two arrays for my t hypothesis. I’d like to test the hypothesis if the is a difference in given arrays.

The formula I used for ttest hypothesis is  =T.TEST($B$2:$B$6,$C$2:$C$8,1,3) because the variance  of these arrays is different.

Interpret the results of your hypothesis test in the context of your research question. Explain what the results mean and how they support or refute your hypothesis. To do that you need to interpret the calculated probability . Calculated p ≥ 0.05 means that difference is not significant and p ≤ 0.05 means that difference is significant. The hypotesis result is 0.406325 so the difference is not significant.

Hypothesized difference has been calculated but let’s check one more method with an add-in.

Hypothesis t-Test Testing using Analysis Toolpak Add-in

There is also a possibility to perform the same t hypothesis testing using Analysis Toolpak Add-in.

Click on Data on the top, beside formula. Click Data analysis.

Note: The data analysis is quite standard. But if it does not show under the data, then it is more likely that it has not been added, which could be done by clicking on File > Options > Add-Ins > Clicking Go on the down side when manage shows Excel Add-ins, and then choosing Data Analysis, and it will be ready.

Browse the Data Analysis, and choose the t-text: two-sample assuming unequal variances.

Select the data for the two columns, write 0 in the Hypothesized mean difference, select the cell desired in the output range.

And this is how to handle Hypothesis Testing in Excel.

Related posts:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

How to Do Hypothesis Tests With the Z.TEST Function in Excel

• Statistics Tutorials
• Probability & Games
• Descriptive Statistics
• Inferential Statistics
• Applications Of Statistics
• Math Tutorials
• Pre Algebra & Algebra
• Exponential Decay
• Worksheets By Grade
• Ph.D., Mathematics, Purdue University
• M.S., Mathematics, Purdue University
• B.A., Mathematics, Physics, and Chemistry, Anderson University

Hypothesis tests are one of the major topics in the area of inferential statistics. There are multiple steps to conduct a hypothesis test and many of these require statistical calculations. Statistical software, such as Excel, can be used to perform hypothesis tests. We will see how the Excel function Z.TEST tests hypotheses about an unknown population mean.

Conditions and Assumptions

We begin by stating the assumptions and conditions for this type of hypothesis test. For inference about the mean we must have the following simple conditions:

• The sample is a simple random sample .
• The sample is small in size relative to the population . Typically this means that the population size is more than 20 times the size of the sample.
• The variable being studied is normally distributed.
• The population standard deviation is known.
• The population mean is unknown.

All of these conditions are unlikely to be met in practice. However, these simple conditions and the corresponding hypothesis test are sometimes encountered early in a statistics class. After learning the process of a hypothesis test, these conditions are relaxed in order to work in a more realistic setting.

Structure of the Hypothesis Test

The particular hypothesis test we consider has the following form:

• State the null and alternative hypotheses .
• Calculate the test statistic, which is a z -score.
• Calculate the p-value by using the normal distribution. In this case the p-value is the probability of obtaining at least as extreme as the observed test statistic, assuming the null hypothesis is true.
• Compare the p-value with the level of significance to determine whether to reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis.

We see that steps two and three are computationally intensive compared two steps one and four. The Z.TEST function will perform these calculations for us.

Z.TEST Function

The Z.TEST function does all of the calculations from steps two and three above. It does a majority of the number crunching for our test and returns a p-value. There are three arguments to enter into the function, each of which is separated by a comma. The following explains the three types of arguments for this function.

• The first argument for this function is an array of sample data. We must enter a range of cells that corresponds to the location of the sample data in our spreadsheet.
• The second argument is the value of μ that we are testing in our hypotheses. So if our null hypothesis is H 0 : μ = 5, then we would enter a 5 for the second argument.
• The third argument is the value of the known population standard deviation. Excel treats this as an optional argument

Notes and Warnings

There are a few things that should be noted about this function:

• The p-value that is output from the function is one-sided. If we are conducting a two-sided test, then this value must be doubled.
• The one-sided p-value output from the function assumes that the sample mean is greater than the value of μ we are testing against. If the sample mean is less than the value of the second argument, then we must subtract the output of the function from 1 to get the true p-value of our test.
• The final argument for the population standard deviation is optional. If this is not entered, then this value is automatically replaced in Excel’s calculations by the sample standard deviation. When this is done, theoretically a t-test should be used instead.

We suppose that the following data are from a simple random sample of a normally distributed population of unknown mean and standard deviation of 3:

1, 2, 3, 3, 4, 4, 8, 10, 12

With a 10% level of significance we wish to test the hypothesis that the sample data are from a population with mean greater than 5. More formally, we have the following hypotheses:

• H 0 : μ= 5
• H a : μ > 5

We use Z.TEST in Excel to find the p-value for this hypothesis test.

• Enter the data into a column in Excel. Suppose this is from cell A1 to A9
• Into another cell enter =Z.TEST(A1:A9,5,3)
• The result is 0.41207.
• Since our p-value exceeds 10%, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

The Z.TEST function can be used for lower tailed tests and two tailed tests as well. However the result is not as automatic as it was in this case. Please see here for other examples of using this function.

• Null Hypothesis Examples
• How to Calculate a Sample Standard Deviation
• What Is a P-Value?
• Example of Two Sample T Test and Confidence Interval
• Hypothesis Test Example
• Hypothesis Test for the Difference of Two Population Proportions
• An Example of a Hypothesis Test
• Functions with the T-Distribution in Excel
• The Runs Test for Random Sequences
• How to Conduct a Hypothesis Test
• Chi-Square Goodness of Fit Test
• What Is the Difference Between Alpha and P-Values?
• How to Use the NORM.INV Function in Excel
• What Level of Alpha Determines Statistical Significance?
• How to Find Degrees of Freedom in Statistics
• Robustness in Statistics

• 800 -274-2874
• [email protected]

Hypothesis Testing

So, a hypothesis is just a statement of theory.  It may or may not be true.  A drug company can claim that a new drug is better at decreasing blood pressure.   You may claim that the diet plan you created helps people lose more weight than a nationally known diet plan.  All these things are just statements – just hypotheses.

The hypothesis is the starting point.  From there, we have to test the hypothesis and reach a decision if the hypothesis is probably true or probably false.  Note the word “probably.”  There is always variation – so there is always a chance for you to make the wrong decision.  This month’s publication takes a look at the five steps involved in conducting a hypothesis test.

In this issue:

• The problem
• A brief pause for the standard normal distribution
• Formulate the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis
• Determine the significance level
• Collect the data and calculate the sample statistics
• Calculate the p value for the hypothesis test
• Compare the p value to the desired significance level

Quick Links

You can download this publication as a pdf here .

The Problem

The average coating thickness is 5 mil.  You want to be sure that the coating thickness remains the same before you will approve the process change.

The team wants to perform a hypothesis test to prove that the average coating thickness will not change.  The team will go through the basic five steps of hypothesis testing:

The details of the five steps are shown below.  However, before those steps are covered, a review of the standard normal distribution is needed.  This will be required when we do some calculations.

A Brief Pause for the Standard Normal Distribution

We need to digress a moment here because we will need to make use of a special case of the normal distribution – when the average = 0 and the standard deviation = 1. This special case is called the standard normal distribution and is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Standard Normal Distribution

For this distribution, the area under the curve from -∞ to +∞ is equal to 1.0. In addition, the area under the curve is proportional to the fraction of measurements that fall in that region. These two facts can used to help determine the fraction of measurements that fall above some value (such as a specification limit), below some value, or between two values.

z=  (x- μ)/σ

where x is some value, μ is the average, and σ is the standard deviation of the x values.  The value of z (the z score) is simply how many standard deviations a value, x, is from the average.

For example, suppose x is 1.5 standard deviations below the average.  In this case, z = -1.5.  The area below z = -1.5 is the percentage of x values that are more than 1.5 standard deviations below the average.  For z = -1.5, that area is 6.68% as is shown in Figure 1.   If z = 1.5, then the area above z = 1.5 is the percentage of x values that are more than 1.5 standard deviations above the average.  This area is also 6.68%.

To find the percentage of data within z = -1.5 and z = 1.5, you simply use the fact that the area under the curve is 100%, so the percentage of data between the two z values is 100 – 6.68 – 6.68 = 86.64%.  You can determine these percentages from a table of z values (see our publication on the normal distribution ) or by using Excel’s NORMSDIST function.

These percentages can also be viewed as probabilities, e.g., the probability of getting a result that is less than -1.5 standard deviations below the average is 0.0668.  We will make use of this knowledge below.  Now back to the steps in hypothesis testing.

Step 1: Formulate the Null Hypothesis and Alternative Hypothesis

So the null hypothesis (H 0 ) is that the process change will not impact the average coating thickness; the average coating thickness (μ) will remain at 5.  This is usually written as:

Now for the alternative hypothesis, which is denoted by H 1 .  The alternative hypothesis is that the process change will have an effect on the average coating thickness and the average coating thickness will not equal 5.  This is usually written as:

This is called a two-sided hypothesis test since you are only interested if the mean is not equal to 5.  You can have one-sided tests where you want the mean to be greater than or less than some value.

Step 2: Determine the Significance Level You Want

The significance level is important in hypothesis testing.  It is the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true.  This probability is denoted by α.  Typical values of  α include 0.05 and 0.01.  You decide that you want α to be 0.05.  This means that there is only a 5% of chance of rejecting the null hypothesis when it is actually true.

Step 3: Collect the Data and Calculate the Sample Statistics

X   = average coating thickness = 5.06

s = standard deviation of the coating thickness = 0.20

We have our statistics.  How do you decide to accept or reject the null hypothesis?  The way you do this is to assume that the null hypothesis is true and then determine the probability (p value) of getting this sample average.  If the p value is large, it means that there is large probability of getting an average thickness of 5.06 with a standard deviation of 0.20 when the null hypothesis is true and you will accept that the null hypothesis is probably true.  But if the probability of getting these statistics is small, you will assume that the null hypothesis is probably not true and reject it in favor the alternative hypothesis.

Step 4: Calculate the p Value

To determine this probability, you will need to consider your sampling distribution.    The distribution of sample averages tends to be normal when the sample size is large enough.  We will use this assumption here.  So, your sampling distribution is represented by all the possible sample averages of sample size 25 from the population of coating thicknesses.  This normal distribution is shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Normal Distribution for Sample Averages

The highest point on the curve is the average.  The population average of the sample averages (μ X ) is equal to the population average, μ, so we have just used μ in Figure 1.  The standard deviation of the sample averages is denoted by σ X .

To be able to draw your sampling distribution, you need to know μ X   and  σ X .  Since you assumed that the null hypothesis is true, μ X   = 5.0.  The standard deviation of the sample averages is given by:

where σ is the population standard deviation and n is the sample size.

You don’t know what the population standard deviation is, but you have an estimate from the sample statistics.  The standard deviation of the 25 samples was 0.2.  You can use this as the population standard deviation.

σ X =σ/√n =  s/√n=0.2/√25=0.04

Now you can draw the sampling distribution and add the sample average as shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3: Sampling Distribution

Now we return to the z score.  Remember, the z score is a measure of how many standard deviations the sample average ( X  )is from the population average (μ).   For this example, the z value is calculated as:

z=  ( X -μ)/σ X =(5.06-5)/.04=.06/.04=1.5

So, 5.06 is 1.5 standard deviations away from the average.    As shown above, the probability of getting a result that is 1.5 standard deviations away from the average is 0.0668.  Remember, this a two-side test, so you didn’t care if the difference was above or below the average.  So, the probability of getting an average that is more than 1.5 standard deviations away from the average is 2(0.0668) = 0.1336 or 13.36%.  This is the p value:

p value = 0.1336

Remember what the p value represents.  You assumed that the null hypothesis is true.  The p value is the probability of getting this result (or a more extreme result) if the null hypothesis is true.

Step 5:  Compare the p value to the Desired Significance Level

In step 2, we set the significance level at 0.05.  Since our p value is greater than this, we conclude that the coating thickness was not impacted by the process change.  We accept the null hypothesis as probably being true.  If the p value had been less than 0.05, we would rejected the null hypothesis and said that the process change did impact the coating thickness.

This newsletter has taken a look at how to perform hypothesis testing.  The five steps are:

• Determine the significance level you want

The normal distribution was used to demonstrate how hypothesis testing is done.  You will not always be dealing with the normal distribution but the process is essentially the same.  One item that is still to be discussed is how to select the sample size.  This will be the subject of a later publication.

• SPC for Excel Software
• Visit our home page
• SPC Training
• SPC Consulting
• Ordering Information

Thanks so much for reading our SPC Knowledge Base. We hope you find it informative and useful. Happy charting and may the data always support your position.

Dr. Bill McNeese BPI Consulting, LLC

Connect with Us

• Basic Statistics
• Item Analysis
• Analysis of Individual Values (ANOX)
• Nonparametric Techniques for Comparing Processes
• Nonparametric Techniques for a Single Sample
• Descriptive Statistics
• Interpretation of Alpha and p-Value
• Just Because There is a Correlation, Doesn’t Mean ….
• Deciding Which Distribution Fits Your Data Best
• Distribution Fitting
• Box-Cox Transformation
• What? My Data are Not Normal?
• Are Skewness and Statistics Useful Statistics – Revisited
• How Many Samples Do I Need?
• Anderson-Darling Test for Normality
• Polls, Sample Size, and Error Margins
• Normal Probability Plots
• Normal Distribution
• Are the Skewness and Kurtosis Useful Statistics?
• Inspecting Supplier Material
• Explaining Standard Deviation

SPC Knowledgebase Newsletter and Videos

Hypothesis Testing — One Sample z Test — How to create your quick workbook using MS Excel

Avikar Banik

Nerd For Tech

Many a times we need to perform Hypothesis Testing for our day to day work but we may not be having access to professional statistical tools. No Problem! MS Excel is a good medium for performing data analytics — we can even perform Hypothesis Testing in MS Excel using excel formulae.

Hypothesis Testing can be performed in following two ways. We will see how to use all these two ways using excel formulae.

• p-value approach
• Critical Value approach

Let us first take an example and form the Hypothesis.

Lets say we have the following data set of values:

Let us now form the hypothesis:

Assume Hypothesized Mean : 5

Null Hypothesis : Population mean is = 5

Alternate Hypothesis : Population mean is <> 5

Based on the alternate hypothesis, this is a Two Tail Test ( since alternate hypothesis says ‘not equal to’ 5 , it means the value can either be more or less than 5 )

Assume population standard deviation : 3

Assume Significance Level (alpha) = 5% or 0.05

The calculated average value of the sample data given above = 5.75 ( use the AVERAGE formula of MS Excel to calculate this value )

Now we have the required information to proceed, let us first start with p-value approach

p-value approach:

First we have to calculate z Statistic value. Mathematically z Statistic is defined as :

[(Sample Mean — Population Mean)] / [(Population Standard Deviation/ SquareRoot(Sample Size) )]

Calculate the z Statistic value by following the below steps:

z Statistic = ( D2-D3)/ (D4/ SQRT (D5)) = 0.7906 ( Assume that the z Statistic value is in the cell D6 of the excel sheet )

Now calculate the p-value using the below formula:

p-value = 2 * NORMDIST (-D6) = 0.4292 [ Here NORMDIST is an excel function and D6 is the excel cell where the z statistic value of 0.7906 is kept ]

IMPORTANT NOTE :

• The excel formula NORMDIST(z) gives the area left of the z value, hence for Left Tail Test p-value = NORMDIST(z)
• The excel formula NORMDIST(z) gives the area left of the z value, hence for Right Tail Test p-value = 1- NORMDIST(z)
• The excel formula NORMDIST(z) gives the area left of the z value, hence for Two Tail Test p-value = 2 * (1-NORMDIST(z)) OR 2 * (NORMDIST(-z))

Conclusion based on p-value : Since the p-value (0.4292) is more than the Significance Level(0.05) , we fail to reject Null Hypothesis

— — — — — — — — — — — this concludes p-value approach — — — — — -

Critical Value Approach

We already know the z Statistic Value which is 0.7906 ( and this value is kept at D6 cell of the excel sheet )

For critical value approach, we first need to calculate the Upper Critical Value and Lower Critical Value:

Upper Critical Value = NORMSINV ( 1- (<Significance Level>/2)) = NORMSINV ( 1- (0.05/2)) = 1.96

Lower Critical Value = NORMSINV ( (<Significance Level>/2)) = NORMSINV ( (0.05/2)) = -1.96

Here NORMSINV is the excel function and Significance Level (0.05) is something we had already set in the beginning)

IMPORTANT NOTE:

• For Left Tail Test z Critical value is calculated as NORMSINV (<significance level>)
• For Right Tail Test z Critical value is calculated as NORMSINV (1- <significance level>)

Conclusion based on Critical Value : Since the z Statistic (0.7906) is within the Critical Value Intervals [-1.96, 1.96] , we fail to reject Null Hypothesis

Thanks for your interest in reading through this article. Watch this space for many more such handy techniques in MS Excel for other various types of Hypothesis Testing.

You can also watch the below video on this same topic :

Written by Avikar Banik

Text to speech

• Mastering Hypothesis Testing in Excel: A Practical Guide for Students

Excel for Hypothesis Testing: A Practical Approach for Students

Hypothesis testing lies at the heart of statistical inference, serving as a cornerstone for drawing meaningful conclusions from data. It's a methodical process used to evaluate assumptions about a population parameter, typically based on sample data. The fundamental idea behind hypothesis testing is to assess whether observed differences or relationships in the sample are statistically significant enough to warrant generalizations to the larger population. This process involves formulating null and alternative hypotheses, selecting an appropriate statistical test, collecting sample data, and interpreting the results to make informed decisions. In the realm of statistical software, SAS stands out as a robust and widely used tool for data analysis in various fields such as academia, industry, and research. Its extensive capabilities make it particularly favored for complex analyses, large datasets, and advanced modeling techniques. However, despite its versatility and power, SAS can have a steep learning curve, especially for students who are just beginning their journey into statistics. The intricacies of programming syntax, data manipulation, and interpreting output may pose challenges for novice users, potentially hindering their understanding of statistical concepts like hypothesis testing. Understanding hypothesis testing is essential for performing statistical analyses and drawing meaningful conclusions from data using Excel 's built-in functions and tools.

Enter Excel, a ubiquitous spreadsheet software that most students are already familiar with to some extent. While Excel may not offer the same level of sophistication as SAS in terms of advanced statistical procedures, it remains a valuable tool, particularly for introductory and intermediate-level analyses. Its intuitive interface, user-friendly features, and widespread accessibility make it an attractive option for students seeking a practical approach to learning statistics. By leveraging Excel's built-in functions, data visualization tools, and straightforward formulas, students can gain hands-on experience with hypothesis testing in a familiar environment. In this blog post, we aim to bridge the gap between theoretical concepts and practical application by demonstrating how Excel can serve as a valuable companion for students tackling hypothesis testing problems, including those typically encountered in SAS assignments. We will focus on demystifying the process of hypothesis testing, breaking it down into manageable steps, and showcasing Excel's capabilities for conducting various tests commonly encountered in introductory statistics courses.

Understanding the Basics

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental concept in statistics that allows researchers to draw conclusions about a population based on sample data. At its core, hypothesis testing involves making a decision about whether a statement regarding a population parameter is likely to be true. This decision is based on the analysis of sample data and is guided by two competing hypotheses: the null hypothesis (H0) and the alternative hypothesis (Ha). The null hypothesis represents the status quo or the absence of an effect. It suggests that any observed differences or relationships in the sample data are due to random variation or chance. On the other hand, the alternative hypothesis contradicts the null hypothesis and suggests the presence of an effect or difference in the population. It reflects the researcher's belief or the hypothesis they aim to support with their analysis.

Formulating Hypotheses

In Excel, students can easily formulate hypotheses using simple formulas and logical operators. For instance, suppose a researcher wants to test whether the mean of a sample is equal to a specified value. They can use the AVERAGE function in Excel to calculate the sample mean and then compare it to the specified value using logical operators like "=" for equality. If the calculated mean is equal to the specified value, it supports the null hypothesis; otherwise, it supports the alternative hypothesis.

Excel's flexibility allows students to customize their hypotheses based on the specific parameters they are testing. Whether it's comparing means, proportions, variances, or other population parameters, Excel provides a user-friendly interface for formulating hypotheses and conducting statistical analysis.

Selecting the Appropriate Test

Excel offers a plethora of functions and tools for conducting various types of hypothesis tests, including t-tests, z-tests, chi-square tests, and ANOVA (analysis of variance). However, selecting the appropriate test requires careful consideration of the assumptions and conditions associated with each test. Students should familiarize themselves with the assumptions underlying each hypothesis test and assess whether their data meets those assumptions. For example, t-tests assume that the data follow a normal distribution, while chi-square tests require categorical data and independence between observations.

Furthermore, students should consider the nature of their research question and the type of data they are analyzing. Are they comparing means of two independent groups or assessing the association between categorical variables? By understanding the characteristics of their data and the requirements of each test, students can confidently choose the appropriate hypothesis test in Excel.

T-tests are statistical tests commonly used to compare the means of two independent samples or to compare the mean of a single sample to a known value. These tests are valuable in various fields, including psychology, biology, economics, and more. In Excel, students can employ the T.TEST function to conduct t-tests, providing them with a practical and accessible way to analyze their data and draw conclusions about population parameters based on sample statistics.

Independent Samples T-Test

The independent samples t-test, also known as the unpaired t-test, is utilized when comparing the means of two independent groups. This test is often employed in experimental and observational studies to assess whether there is a significant difference between the means of the two groups. In Excel, students can easily organize their data into separate columns representing the two groups, calculate the sample means and standard deviations for each group, and then use the T.TEST function to obtain the p-value. The p-value obtained from the T.TEST function represents the probability of observing the sample data if the null hypothesis, which typically states that there is no difference between the means of the two groups, is true.

A small p-value (typically less than the chosen significance level, commonly 0.05) indicates that there is sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis, suggesting a significant difference between the group means. By conducting an independent samples t-test in Excel, students can not only assess the significance of differences between two groups but also gain valuable experience in data analysis and hypothesis testing, which are essential skills in various academic and professional settings.

Paired Samples T-Test

The paired samples t-test, also known as the dependent t-test or matched pairs t-test, is employed when comparing the means of two related groups. This test is often used in studies where participants are measured before and after an intervention or when each observation in one group is matched or paired with a specific observation in the other group. Examples include comparing pre-test and post-test scores, analyzing the performance of individuals under different conditions, and assessing the effectiveness of a treatment or intervention. In Excel, students can perform a paired samples t-test by first calculating the differences between paired observations (e.g., subtracting the before-measurement from the after-measurement). Next, they can use the one-sample t-test function, specifying the calculated differences as the sample data. This approach allows students to determine whether the mean difference between paired observations is statistically significant, indicating whether there is a meaningful change or effect between the two related groups.

Interpreting the results of a paired samples t-test involves assessing the obtained p-value in relation to the chosen significance level. A small p-value suggests that there is sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis, indicating a significant difference between the paired observations. This information can help students draw meaningful conclusions from their data and make informed decisions based on statistical evidence. By conducting paired samples t-tests in Excel, students can not only analyze the relationship between related groups but also develop critical thinking skills and gain practical experience in hypothesis testing, which are valuable assets in both academic and professional contexts. Additionally, mastering the application of statistical tests in Excel can enhance students' data analysis skills and prepare them for future research endeavors and real-world challenges.

Chi-Square Test

The chi-square test is a versatile statistical tool used to assess the association between two categorical variables. In essence, it helps determine whether the observed frequencies in a dataset significantly deviate from what would be expected under certain assumptions. Excel provides a straightforward means to perform chi-square tests using the CHISQ.TEST function, which calculates the probability associated with the chi-square statistic.

Goodness-of-Fit Test

One application of the chi-square test is the goodness-of-fit test, which evaluates how well the observed frequencies in a single categorical variable align with the expected frequencies dictated by a theoretical distribution. This test is particularly useful when researchers wish to ascertain whether their data conforms to a specific probability distribution. In Excel, students can organize their data into a frequency table, listing the categories of the variable of interest along with their corresponding observed frequencies. They can then specify the expected frequencies based on the theoretical distribution they are testing against. For example, if analyzing the outcomes of a six-sided die roll, where each face is expected to occur with equal probability, the expected frequency for each category would be the total number of observations divided by six.

Once the observed and expected frequencies are determined, students can employ the CHISQ.TEST function in Excel to calculate the chi-square statistic and its associated p-value. The p-value represents the probability of obtaining a chi-square statistic as extreme or more extreme than the observed value under the assumption that the null hypothesis is true (i.e., the observed frequencies match the expected frequencies). Interpreting the results of the goodness-of-fit test involves comparing the calculated p-value to a predetermined significance level (commonly denoted as α). If the p-value is less than α (e.g., α = 0.05), there is sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis, indicating that the observed frequencies significantly differ from the expected frequencies specified by the theoretical distribution. Conversely, if the p-value is greater than α, there is insufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis, suggesting that the observed frequencies align well with the expected frequencies.

Test of Independence

Another important application of the chi-square test in Excel is the test of independence, which evaluates whether there is a significant association between two categorical variables in a contingency table. This test is employed when researchers seek to determine whether the occurrence of one variable is related to the occurrence of another. To conduct a test of independence in Excel, students first create a contingency table that cross-tabulates the two categorical variables of interest. Each cell in the table represents the frequency of occurrences for a specific combination of categories from the two variables.

Similar to the goodness-of-fit test, students then calculate the expected frequencies for each cell under the assumption of independence between the variables. Using the CHISQ.TEST function in Excel, students can calculate the chi-square statistic and its associated p-value based on the observed and expected frequencies in the contingency table. The interpretation of the test results follows a similar procedure to that of the goodness-of-fit test, with the p-value indicating whether there is sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis of independence between the two variables.

Excel, despite being commonly associated with spreadsheet tasks, offers a plethora of features that make it a versatile and powerful tool for statistical analysis, especially for students diving into the intricacies of hypothesis testing. Its widespread availability and user-friendly interface make it accessible to students at various levels of statistical proficiency. However, the true value of Excel lies not just in its accessibility but also in its ability to facilitate a hands-on learning experience that reinforces theoretical concepts.

At the core of utilizing Excel for hypothesis testing is a solid understanding of the fundamental principles of statistical inference. Students need to grasp concepts such as the null and alternative hypotheses, significance levels, p-values, and test statistics. Excel provides a practical platform for students to apply these concepts in a real-world context. Through hands-on experimentation with sample datasets, students can observe how changes in data inputs and statistical parameters affect the outcome of hypothesis tests, thus deepening their understanding of statistical theory.

Post a comment...

Mastering hypothesis testing in excel: a practical guide for students submit your homework, attached files.

Disclaimer: Early release articles are not considered as final versions. Any changes will be reflected in the online version in the month the article is officially released.

Volume 30, Number 8—August 2024

Online Report

Wastewater target pathogens of public health importance for expanded sampling, houston, texas, usa.

Suggested citation for this article

Building on the success of initiatives put forth during the COVID-19 pandemic response, US health officials are expanding wastewater surveillance programs to track other target pathogens and diseases of public health interest. The Houston Health Department in Houston, Texas, USA, conducted a hypothesis-generating study whereby infectious disease subject matter experts suggested potential targets. This study addressed 2 criteria recommended by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine for selecting wastewater targets. Results can be used as a basis of a questionnaire for a future population-based study to recommend targets of highest priority to include for expanded wastewater sampling.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, wastewater surveillance, the measurement of pathogen levels in wastewater, emerged as a critical tool used by public health authorities to monitor the SARS-CoV-2 virus ( 1 ). Wastewater data, when paired with traditional surveillance methods, is poised now to play an important role in informing disease prevention and mitigation strategies for additional target pathogens ( 2 ). In May 2020, the Houston Health Department (HHD; Houston, TX, USA), in collaboration with municipal and academic partners, established a comprehensive SARS-CoV-2 wastewater surveillance system for the city of Houston, which subsequently became a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Wastewater Surveillance System Center of Excellence ( 3 ).

The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine recommends selection of targets to expand wastewater surveillance beyond SARS-CoV-2 be based on 3 criteria: 1) public health significance, 2) analytical feasibility, and 3) usefulness of the wastewater surveillance data to inform public health action ( 4 ). The HHD, working with an existing advisory committee of local infectious disease doctors and public health specialists, conducted a hypothesis-generating study whereby infectious disease subject matter experts (SMEs) suggested a list of pathogens or diseases (hereafter referred to as targets) to be considered for surveillance with respect to criteria 1 and 3 above, considering feasibility for assessment outside the scope of the study ( 5 ).

Study Development and Implementation

The survey on which the study is based ( Appendix 1 ) provides its intended purpose, indicates that de-identified results would be publicly shared in aggregate, and asks for consent to participate ( Appendix 2 ). Upon consent, the participants provided contact information, academic credentials, and rankings of the 74 targets in terms of the public health importance and actionability for public health intervention (e.g., education, outreach, testing, vaccination). The target options were compiled from the HHD’s database of reportable diseases monitored in Houston, Texas ( 6 , 7 ). SARS-CoV-2 virus, required by the National Wastewater Surveillance System, was excluded from this list. Participants classified public health importance by most important, important, or less important, and actionability for public health intervention by actionable, somewhat actionable, not actionable, and don’t know. Finally, participants were asked to identify the top 3 most important targets from the list; they were also invited to provide comments and suggest additional targets not listed.

The study population was selected by using nonprobability methods, without use of quotas or incentives. Following recommendations from the advisory committee, the study team distributed invitations to participate in the study by using email listservs, newsletters, and online forums, including those affiliated with the Infectious Diseases Society of America, Big Cities Heath Coalition, and the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, to encourage self-identified infectious disease SMEs to participate. The study period was February 28–August 31, 2023. Rice University’s Institutional Review Board reviewed and approved all study procedures. The study adheres to accepted public opinion research guidelines ( 8 ).

Data Analysis

We exported survey responses from the Qualtrics platform ( https://www.qualtrics.com ) into Excel software. We checked survey responses for duplicates, using the participant’s name and organization, and completeness. We excluded responses with only the consent portion filled out but without any further completion of personal information or classification of targets.

We tallied response counts by category for each possible classification option and assigned numerical weights. In the Public Health Importance category, most important = 3 points, important = 2 points, and less important = 1 point. In the Actionable for Public Health Intervention category, actionable = 3 points, somewhat actionable = 2 points, not actionable option = 1 point, and don’t know = 0 points. We assigned don’t know responses 0 points to differentiate from nonresponses. We multiplied weights by the number of participant responses for each option and then totaled for each target in both categories. Category totals provided an overall total score for each target. We also calculated averages, total divided by the number of participant responses for each target (including don’t know responses), to better interpret results for targets when not all participants submitted responses for each of the 74 targets on the target list. We added the average scores for each category to obtain an overall average score for each target.

We sorted the overall total scores and overall average scores from highest to lowest to generate top 10 lists for suggested targets. We ranked targets 1–10 based on their score in each category (ranking tied scores equally) ( Table ). Because >1 target can have the same score, >10 suggested targets could be obtained.

The HHD received 47 unique and complete survey responses affiliated with 42 unique organizations (19 university or hospital systems, 21 public health departments, 2 others) from 21 different states, primarily in large cities or counties. Of the participants from public health departments, 19 worked at the city or county level and 2 worked at state-level agencies.

There was significant consistency across both categories. The suggested targets based on the 10 highest score values in either category were influenza A (novel or variant), measles (rubeola), hepatitis A, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, monkeypox virus, Neisseria meningitidis (invasive [meningococcal disease]), Candida auris , West Nile virus, rabies (human), anthrax, legionellosis, pertussis, and cholera. Participants suggested several additional targets of concern to include in expanded wastewater monitoring, including norovirus, rotavirus, Marburg virus, and multidrug-resistant pathogens. Suggested target lists from academic, healthcare, and public health participants included measles, influenza A, hepatitis A, and Neisseria meningitidis , with an expected variance between lists relevant to each participant group’s healthcare focus.

The results of this study cannot be used to represent opinions regarding the prioritization of these suggested targets and cannot be generalized to a broader population, but they can be used to suggest a list of targets that could be considered for surveillance. As such, results from the study identified a list of 13 targets to be considered for expanded wastewater sampling based on public health importance and actionability. The results also can be used as the basis of a questionnaire for a future population-based study, with the intent of homing in on recommendations for target prioritization on a broader scale. Furthermore, supplementing these results with additional data based on local needs might favor the inclusion of different targets for a specific region.

A critical first step in expanding a wastewater surveillance program is to understand the pathogens that infectious disease SMEs consider to be the greatest threat to public health. A previous study ranked targets for wastewater surveillance prioritization by using binary and quantitative parameters based in empirical disease data ( 9 ). Other disease prioritization studies that incorporated feedback from SMEs were not focused specifically on rankings for wastewater surveillance and had narrower scopes focusing on specific events or types of targets ( 10 , 11 ). The methods used in this study complement those approaches by bringing in perspectives from infectious disease SMEs with a first-hand view of how these targets affect disease in the broader community, whose responses were provided with the express intent of translating the collective data to wastewater monitoring. We believe that these study results can be used to suggest an expanded target list for the National Wastewater Surveillance System and serve as pilot information for future studies.

Komal Sheth is a data scientist for the Data Sciences program at the Houston Health Department, Houston, Texas. In this role, she is dedicated to using data-driven approaches to enhance community well-being. Her research focuses on leveraging insights grounded in evidence-based methods to identify and address health disparities, bringing data to action with the development of targeted public health interventions and policies that promote healthier communities.

Acknowledgment

The authors acknowledge the group of entities who collaborated to disseminate the study invitation: Dawn Koob from the Gulf Coast Consortium for Quantitative Biomedical Sciences; Cesar Arias from the Infectious Diseases Society of America; Chrissie Juliano from Big Cities Health Coalition; Marci Layton from the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists; Trish Perl from the Texas Medical Association Committee on Infectious Diseases; and Susan McLellan from the University of Texas Medical Branch Special Pathogens Excellence in Clinical Treatment Readiness & Education (SPECTRE) program and Division of Infectious Diseases.

• Kirby  AE , Walters  MS , Jennings  WC , Fugitt  R , LaCross  N , Mattioli  M , et al. Using wastewater surveillance data to support the COVID-19 response—United States, 2020–2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep . 2021 ; 70 : 1242 – 4 . DOI PubMed Google Scholar
• Diamond  MB , Keshaviah  A , Bento  AI , Conroy-Ben  O , Driver  EM , Ensor  KB , et al. Wastewater surveillance of pathogens can inform public health responses. Nat Med . 2022 ; 28 : 1992 – 5 . DOI PubMed Google Scholar
• Hopkins  L , Ensor  KB , Stadler  L , Johnson  CD , Schneider  R , Domakonda  K , et al. Public Health Interventions Guided by Houston’s wastewater surveillance program during the COVID-19 pandemic. Public Health Rep . 2023 ; 138 : 856 – 61 . DOI PubMed Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Wastewater-based disease surveillance for public health action. Washington: The National Academies Press; 2023 .
• Houston Wastewater Epidemiolog ; Infectious Disease Doctor Advisory Committee . 2022 [ cited 2023 Nov 17 ]. https://hou-wastewater-epi.org/team-members/infectious-disease-doctor-advisory-committee
• Texas Department of State Health Services . Texas Notifiable Conditions—2023. 2023 [ cited 2023 Nov 17 ]. https://www.dshs.texas.gov/sites/default/files/IDCU/investigation/Reporting-forms/Notifiable-Conditions-2023Color.pdf
• Troppy  S , Haney  G , Cocoros  N , Cranston  K , DeMaria  A Jr . Infectious disease surveillance in the 21st century: an integrated web-based surveillance and case management system. Public Health Rep . 2014 ; 129 : 132 – 8 . DOI PubMed Google Scholar
• American Association for Public Opinion Research . AAPOR Code of Professional Ethics and Practices. 2021 [ cited 2024 Feb 15 ]. https://aapor.org/standards-and-ethics
• Gentry  Z , Zhao  L , Faust  RA , David  RE , Norton  J , Xagoraraki  I . Wastewater surveillance beyond COVID-19: a ranking system for communicable disease testing in the tri-county Detroit area, Michigan, USA. Front Public Health . 2023 ; 11 : 1178515 . DOI PubMed Google Scholar
• Economopoulou  A , Kinross  P , Domanovic  D , Coulombier  D . Infectious diseases prioritisation for event-based surveillance at the European Union level for the 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games. Euro Surveill . 2014 ; 19 : 20770 . DOI PubMed Google Scholar
• Cardoen  S , Van Huffel  X , Berkvens  D , Quoilin  S , Ducoffre  G , Saegerman  C , et al. Evidence-based semiquantitative methodology for prioritization of foodborne zoonoses. Foodborne Pathog Dis . 2009 ; 6 : 1083 – 96 . DOI PubMed Google Scholar
• Appendix 1 .
• Appendix 2 .
• Table . Wastewater targets as suggested by infectious disease subject matter experts who participated in a study of wastewater target pathogens of public health importance for expanded sampling, Houston, Texas, USA, February...

Suggested citation for this article : Sheth K, Hopkins L, Domakonda K, Stadler L, Ensor KB, Johnson CD, et al. Wastewater target pathogens of public health importance for expanded sampling, Houston, Texas, USA. Emerg Infect Dis. 2024 Aug [ date cited ]. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid3008.231564

DOI: 10.3201/eid3008.231564

Original Publication Date: July 16, 2024

Table of Contents – Volume 30, Number 8—August 2024

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Loren Hopkins, Houston Health Department, 8000 N Stadium Dr, 2nd Fl, Houston, TX 77054, USA

Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.

There was an unexpected error. Message not sent.

Exit Notification / Disclaimer Policy

• The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) cannot attest to the accuracy of a non-federal website.
• Linking to a non-federal website does not constitute an endorsement by CDC or any of its employees of the sponsors or the information and products presented on the website.
• You will be subject to the destination website's privacy policy when you follow the link.
• CDC is not responsible for Section 508 compliance (accessibility) on other federal or private website.

Metric Details

What is the altmetric attention score.

The Altmetric Attention Score for a research output provides an indicator of the amount of attention that it has received. The score is derived from an automated algorithm, and represents a weighted count of the amount of attention Altmetric picked up for a research output.